hello, to work, to work, there are no vacationers here, everyone is working, and you, i am resting, no one is bored at home, they are waiting, don't be afraid, i will have time , i will rest and leave. "so we will see each other, you are in the dining room, nothing happened to you, what's the matter, your husband came in right in the middle of the lesson, took tanya, took her away, i didn't dare ask, please replace me if i don't make it to the lesson, what happened"? i need to step away, don't worry,

hello, where is this from? everything, everything, everything, everything, everything, thank you! what happened? don't ask, i should have foreseen where we were, the village is nearby, his sister lives, wait, wait, he left, took tanya with him, everything you can expect, and will you take ilinsky? you have to

leave, he will come back immediately, i asked him, he will come back and torture you and gosha, i am used to it, and my son is almost an adult, i will wait a couple of days, then i will take you and the children, no, you can't cheat with him, he will outsmart and hurt everyone, leave, leave right now. what did she say, she doesn't know anything, he could have gone anywhere, or maybe he is sitting in the neighboring ravine and covering tanya's mouth so that she doesn't scream, an angry and unhappy person, no there is nothing more terrible than such people.

what a beautiful life around and how absurdly and stupidly it has passed, has not passed yet, valya, youth passes, but love remains, remains the same, such things will remain. take your son, leave. yes, valya.

well, thank you, mistress, thank you, but what for me, well, you let a male spirit into the house, i will not open the windows on purpose, so that it does not evaporate, maybe we will see each other someday, how i fly, i do not know, i will kiss you , i fly, i do not know, but i fly. how i kiss you i do not know, i will kiss and slowly melt, i will kiss and i will melt, as i kiss, i rejoice, like birds, i spin, and such, i am such, and i rejoice, i will embrace you, tenderly cooing, well, come on? i am getting drunk

, i am conjuring, i am getting drunk, i am conjuring, as i conjure, there is a big game on the air, this has already become a familiar phrase for me, when i speak at the beginning of the program, on the fronts of ukraine, on the fronts belonging to ukraine.

what did the ministry of defense say about this? during the past night, when the kiev regime attempted to carry out a terrorist attack using unmanned aerial vehicles on objects on the territory of the russian federation 's air defense alert systems destroyed and intercepted 144 ukrainian fixed-wing uavs, 72 uavs in the bryansk region, 20 in the moscow region, 14 in the kursk region, 13 in the tula region, eight in the belgorod region, seven in the kaluga region, five in the voronezh region, four in the lipetsk region, and one in the oryol region. correct me, general buiginsky, this attack was on its own

scale, maybe even unprecedented, although i'm not sure, in terms of its results it's very modest, but it's clear that they're going for it, well, as they say, they're paying attention. yes, it's natural, dmitry, i think that during the entire conflict, first the special military operation, 144 aircraft-type drones, long-range, they cover quite a large distance, although of course, there's no complete certainty that they were all launched from the territory of ukraine, but we'll assume that since there was no other information that from the territory ukraine. yes, of course, unmanned aircraft are now the only means at the disposal of the ukrainian armed forces, with the help of which, with the help of which it can try to cause damage, but first of all, you know, damage to civilian objects, i do not

think that all of them were aimed at some military objects, because these are, as a rule, oil refineries, and uh. indiscriminately by populated areas, unfortunately, despite the fact that our air defense system, it is the best in the world, this is recognized, be embarrassed we don't need that, we have the most advanced, the newest systems, and they are updated, if we take, for example, the american patriot, which hasn't undergone any modifications for probably 15 years, then our...

a type of armed forces, like the country's air defense system, which we had, in the soviet union, of course, then it was liquidated in the late eighties, early nineties, merged into the air force, then the aerospace forces. i don't know,

i'm not sure, probably, it would be from the point of view of subordination to this type, as it was in in the soviet union, fighter jets. well, there were no such powerful means of detection, tracking, radar, radio engineering , well, that is, then, if we take the great patriotic war, then the air defense forces, they were at a rather, well , very modest level, mainly fighter aircraft and anti-aircraft anti-aircraft weapons were in operation -

i mean ukraine, and of course, its patrons, that in general, from all the ukrainian failures, from all the ukrainian problems, they still make only one conclusion, that it is necessary to push even harder, or i don't notice anything, you know, it's not that they are pushing even harder, they, well, the fact that they have problems is obvious, they have problems with personnel, they have problems with funds for...

120, but let's take the maximum 20 thousand, six brigades are 3,500 each, so the losses amounted to almost more than half of the personnel, plus 974, in my opinion, i'm afraid i'm mistaken, a unit of armored vehicles, 84 tanks, these are huge losses, i talked to people who just today, who returned from - from kursk areas. well, the equipment is simply littered with broken equipment, those, those territories

that have already been liberated by our troops from ukrainian control - plus - of course , there are dead bodies everywhere, no one is cleaning them up, the ukrainians , neither killed nor wounded, simply abandon everything, they are lying there under the scorching sun and in general, in general, a terrible picture, moreover, now they have taken this, there were three assault brigades, one of them is the eightieth, now the eightieth brigade, i think yesterday, began to be transferred to donetsk in the donetsk direction, so that say to strengthen the group there, but not the whole brigade, but half the brigade, that is , this throwing around, the transfer of units from one area to another, this is evidence that with their personnel, of course, not... very well, although, well, if they are not very well now, then, probably,

it will not get better, right? you know, the americans, i just read one analytical article there today, published in an american, in one of the american magazines, they believe that now the main thing for ukraine is to hold out until winter, in winter russian, of course, nothing, not even until winter, somewhere around november, when the snow starts to get thawed out, then winter. in winter, of course, the russians won't do anything, they'll lick their wounds themselves, at that time ukraine will conduct, so to speak, mobilization, conduct preparations with the help of its western... partners-allies by the summer of next year they'll have a fresh group of about 700,000 people with the help of which they'll not only, so to speak , restore the situation on the fronts there in donbass, but also undertake another of their own offensive or counteroffensive,

most likely in the south. hence these unmanned boats that are now coming from all countries, pontoon... bridges, that is, perhaps they are counting on next year, next summer to undertake something in the south, but i think it is unlikely, they will have time, i still hope that our armed forces, taking into account the pace that they have gained now, should fulfill the tasks of the svo, i cannot, of course, make any predictions, but by the end of the year, i think, the main tasks should be solved, and at the same time...

we see that the united states of america is trying to maintain its global military and political dominance at any cost, and for this purpose, using ukraine, they are trying to inflict a strategic defeat on our country.

do you see any grounds for optimism? well, first of all, i am sure that when speaking about any development of events, our president did not mean peace talks on the terms of the so -called zelensky peace plan, moreover, while ukrainian forces are in

the kursk region, i think there is no point in talking about any talks.

zelensky's plan, which had 10 points, and seven, so, were kind of left aside, three remained, but still, even these three points, this is de facto a recognition of russia's defeat, capitulation, withdrawal of troops to the border of ninety-one and so on, in

this regard, you mentioned european diplomacy, the most recent example, the statement of the european union, the european foreign service following our regional elections. it can be reduced to a phrase of two words: crimea is ukrainian, that's all, that is, according to in fact, the european union has not had any thoughts, especially bright ones, and will not have any, apparently, now all their energy is focused on internal squabbles, they did not give. as tomorrow the announcement of the new composition of the european commission is expected, and there is such a tug of war going on, which, so to speak, you would not

wish on anyone, that's what concerns, well, about the elections in the united states, i think everyone knows, we will still talk about them, in moscow there are, i still see two different points of view on the relations of the united states and... leading european countries, everyone understands that the united states seems to play a decisive role, but some people think that the united states decides everything on its own, and the europeans, well, not exactly puppets, but close to it, and another point of view is that the europeans have their own motives, and we should also try to work with them individually, because a lot depends on them. what is your opinion, and you know, there is no clear answer to this question and, probably, there cannot be, yes, the europeans, including the european union,

and the european nato countries, they have undergone such an evolution in recent years, rather degradation, and the european union itself has submitted, in fact, to the strategic line of nato, and led by the united states, of course, among the europeans there are the most naked, we know well, by the way, the conversations that are now going on around what i mentioned, namely the composition of the european commission, they do not give reason for calm, because they are being put forward to key positions.

so here is such a kind of answer and yes, to the first, so to speak, option, and maybe an element for the second option, that is, the diverse position of the countries of the european union, and it is no coincidence, by the way, in fact, now it has come to astrakism in relation to...

and in many other issues, you know, when we talk about breaking the rules, i always think, what did i like about america? the first thing i liked about america was the first amendment to the constitution, which guaranteed freedom of speech and freedom of religion, well, about freedom of speech in america, i see it less and less, about... freedom of religion on the church in america there is enormous pressure so that they meet sexual minority and generally did things that

are like in their religious tradition.

which you have, it is not a right, but a privilege for faithful service to the ruling regime, if you are not ready to serve, then at any moment this property can be taken away from you, but i want to ask you now about freedom of speech, and not in some general theoretical sense, in the context of our conversation about the intentions of the collective west, now i see a wonderful quote. one of the most reasonable veterans of american diplomacy, from my point of view, jack metlack. let's hear it. once both sides have nuclear arsenals on alert, it's easy to misinterpret the signals. what we're ignoring in our undeclared war against russia is that it has many other ways to hit us that will be very difficult to deal with. these attacks can be

carried out in ways that would be very difficult to deal with.

confrontation with a country like the soviet union, and that it can't be brought to the level of taking on the responsibility of the union. and so i thought, well, that's great, jack. matlock says all these things, americans should get acquainted with them. i find out, jack matlock said this in an interview with a publication called executive intelligence review. he is a follower of lyndon. but i don’t know how to say it. but in america, this is worse than renegades, this is worse than marginals, this is a group that, well, what you said there, it seems to be starting to label you, i am sure that jack matlock said this to them, because he did not have the opportunity to say this to anyone else, to anyone else, as the heads of the cia and mi6 did in a joint financial times article, we

'll talk about it now. what was mentioned, but now karen, i want you to simply explain , again, as a film director and an engineer of human souls, well, how is it that, how did america get to a situation where it is impossible to have a free conversation on the most key topics concerning america's survival? well, first of all, dmitry, let me express words of support to you, publicly, i do this, i... sincerely support you, admire your courage and your integrity, actually regarding freedom of speech, here you are there is the very example of what american freedom of speech has come to, well, you mean the accusations that were brought against me, which are absolutely empty and impossible, you were charged for having your own point of view, and in no speech of yours, we often

meet, have you ever said anything offensive about america, the united states and its people, you have led everything unusually subtly and correctly simply because you have. good impressions, it was free country, there was a feeling that really, you are free, really very, very, very comfortable a person feels there, even with all that, of course, i saw on

the streets of ihomles, it was all there, but nevertheless the general atmosphere was completely different, since then i have also been to america many times, it became more and more, you know, i love the soviet union, but you can’t take the words out of a song, it became more and more like the late soviet union, you can’t do this, you can’t do that, this, this, don’t do this, don’t do that do it, that is, it was increasingly turning into such a, let's say, police country, this is just my personal feeling, this is everyday, i was not part of any of these special political circles there, but i communicated mainly with people of my circle, with ordinary... americans, all this was turning into, well, but apparently, this is the path that any empire inevitably goes through, which is tending to decline, for me this, for me this is the most reliable sign, everything is becoming dogmatic, everything is unwieldy,

everything, everything is prohibited, everything is, as it were, everything, contradictions are growing, they are not trying to resolve them, but simply hiding it in the sand, and of course, in this sense freedom of speech is the first -

hemp-maker, i have no doubt that, that this, that this was agreed with the americans, well, i can tell you, sovereignty from american sources, that it was agreed, yes of course, yes, this does not even need sources, this is already absolutely obvious, they act more and more rudely, assertively, and the most important thing is that they, they do not just establish rules there, well, in principle this is really what they declare, accuse russia of. this is a totalitarian country has become, look at how the elections are going, their main contender for the presidency, what they don't do to stop him, any of these lawsuits, the lowest meanness, everything, so to speak, i

'm not a fan of trump, but i must say that it's impossible, this has never happened, this has never really happened, this is no era, even the era of mocarism was not like this.

have you heard of the yarmak mcfaul commission? no,

this is a unique commission, it is on the american end, it is headed by the former ambassador to moscow, michael mcfaul, who, well, is simply a pathological russophobe, because he came here in the nineties as a young democrat, taught russia how to live, and you did not listen to him,

"if you were a man, you would have spat on everything , took her, think about it, if you decide, we will leave, take the girl with you, do not object, think about it, and whose will you be, i am dimka tamilin, i was there in moscow, in moscow, with your mother, bedbor, with natasha, what, i can not live without you, premiere, tomorrow after the program time". in the new season on the first, in the city

there are already rumors about this crime, wherever you go, they say everywhere, women are lured into a taxi and shot in the back, i wanted to ask you about your find, this knot seemed very massive, although it was picked up quite easily, it is worthy of great honor of moles, honor and trust of the reich, remember this, after the war i was looking for a colleague's son, i was interested in what happened there at the end of the war, and anything could have happened there . if you don't have a photo? strange, where were they, were they here? lord, how similar to my son? you are the only real witness, the only person he came to openly. well, major, has the hunt begun? confrontation. premiere of the legendary book by yulian semyonov.

there's a big game on the air. and as we agreed, karen georgievich, now your question, to evgeny petrovich. as i naturally do not undertake to judge in the military sphere, so i am addressing it to evgeny petrovich, in connection with these drones. but there is no feeling that this entire mass attack was a test of our air defense, before launching strikes with long-range missiles, because it is clear that all movements are recorded by the americans from satellites, which means they have detected everything, all the actions of our air defense, but this suggests to the mouse that they are ready to launch strikes with long-range missiles? koringer, you are absolutely right, there is such a technique when - so to speak, in order to identify the air defense system

, a large number of targets are launched, including false targets, the air defense system is overloaded, all this, all this is really so, let's remember the south rye boeing, but as for there, to say, preparation for strikes with long-range missiles, there are no missiles, you understand, such long-range ones, the maximum that they have is the english stormshadow, well , the anglo-french, the french scalps and so... the agm-158 jasm, which they are asking the americans for and supposedly, which the americans have already agreed to give them, well, what can i say, a good weapon, but yes, high accuracy, low visibility, flies at low altitude

, following the terrain, that's all, but firstly , we have learned to intercept them, secondly, their range is 300 km, there are more.

we are all the same, no, they don’t have the means to get to moscow yet, although they again boast that they have their own developments, they remembered the thunder-2, some kind of polenitsa, they invented this drone with a jet engine, but

so far all these are isolated examples, they haven’t shown themselves anywhere yet, and despite the fact that zelensky again boasts...

let’s listen to what he says about the help of different countries to russia, any country that provides assistance to russia, whether it is direct military assistance, as iran does and north korea, or china, which provides assistance indirectly. in any case, all this contributes to the prolongation of the war, poses a threat not only to the ukrainian people, but to all of europe. ask any european colleague, any european will tell you that the biggest threat to europe since world war ii. this is russia, that's what i like, this, who is the secretary of state, it is not clear, is he giving some kind of creative, authorial commentary or? he is some kind of ultimatum, but in relation to iran, which is about the same as russia, is under all possible sanctions, so

let's listen to what instructions are being given to iran. the us has warned of a new threat, iran's supply of ballistic missiles to russia. we have warned iran publicly and privately that this step would mean a dramatic escalation. russia has already received these ballistic missiles and will most likely use them in a few weeks. in ukraine against ukrainians. russia has its own missile arsenal, but the supply of ram missiles will allow russia to use most of its missiles for targets located further from the front line, and with the new missiles that it receives from iran to hit targets located close by. well, i don’t even know what to say, a country that is leading a coalition that is arming ukraine with weapons worth more than hundreds of billions of dollars. so he is unhappy, well, how should we react to this? first of all, i believe that we should not be surprised by this rhetoric,

blinken has been doing this for a long time, and therefore we should not expect that the countries that are the recipients of this criticism, they they will be scared, i think, it is not worth it. they will not be scared, they will not be scared, neither iran, nor north korea, nor china, especially, and so, such, in addition, attempts to speak for others, including for europeans, that europeans should, europeans will definitely, this also generally causes an ambiguous reaction, in the end, if you look at the results...

in germany, at least they are changing, and now, by the way, germany is not the only exception, similar trends are taking place in a number of other countries. so what to talk about that the american course on all possible, so to speak, support of ukraine by all means, enjoys unconditional support from european countries, i think, can already be considered an exaggeration, at least, i am here to be.

so that russia preserves its sovereignty , including in the field of culture, and karen georgievich chahnazarov, who is going to the st. petersburg forum on culture, where this is one of the main topics, knows a lot about this. korin, what is cultural sovereignty? cultural sovereignty, well, it is sovereignty in the field cultures, which, as they say, in my opinion, we have lost to a large extent. in the nineties, in my opinion, we still have not, have not returned it, of course,

some movements in this, cultural independence, right? what is sovereignty? this is cultural independence, this is when when a national culture is, forms the worldview of citizens of its country, and today in our country to a large extent the national culture still does not form the worldview of many, let's say, so to speak citizens, and this of course in my opinion problem, because you can have politically...

you can't say that the state can create a culture by order, but at the same time the state, if it has an ideology and a clear understanding of what kind of culture it wants, it can have a strong influence, for example, i think that in general the entire great russian culture of the 19th century, pushkin, lermaty, all the classics, they all came out of the reforms of peter i, they all came out of there.

in my opinion there is a problem that may be discussed here, i am sure that it will be discussed, at least we will this is to be discussed with the forum participants and tomorrow on thursday, now we are going to commercials, and after commercials we will have a round table, and today there will be debates of candidates for the post

of president in the united states, yeah, and i will not try to ask. participants of our conversation, who will say what at these debates who will win, i will have another question, that's when these debates. write, a group of armed persons, i do not see, with the presence of gasoline on the bus, i do not see another

solution, why are the engines running, who is on the plane? stepan, there is a crew on the plane, you you can safely come on board. how are the children? everyone is very tired and wants to go home. let me try to persuade him to surrender. we will always have time to storm. zaitsev, you are not crazy. in crimea during the liberation of crimea, and then odessa happened, for me this is probably the beginning, when something switched, i was killed by a beautiful, large plane, i think that it hurts her.

the big game is on air, today in america there will be debates of candidates for the post of president, at the moment on issues of public opinion, they have approximately equal support. i do not

i will predict, i will not even try to predict how the debates will go and, most importantly, how the elections will end, but general byzhinsky, most likely, the result of these elections will be close for the two candidates, as... you know, the very formulation of this question, and it is being posed in america, biden was asked this question, and biden.