also sympathized with the greeks, first of all , he defended the interests, of course, greek, although as a politician he was certainly much larger than the same nesilrodi, with whom they waited and who was removed precisely thanks to him, and so he also later became the ruler of greece, quite naturally, here the historian sergei tatishchev wrote, there was not a single russian person left in the positions ...

tolstoy, the director of the asian department, yegor petrovich kovalevsky, all these are russian names. alexandra, after all, before his arrival to power, was a more conservative person than his own father, but when he came to power after the crimean war, it was absolutely obvious that it was necessary to carry out a personnel purge, a global one, and people were needed, some, as nikolai said, that why he did not bring the russians to service, because the russians serve russia, and the germans serve me. so alexander ii understood that the situation needed to be changed. in general, his career, as if from two sides, was influenced by two directly opposing forces, on the one hand, brilliant abilities and this was generally recognized by all admitted, on the other hand, his character, of course, there was a story when he was still an adviser in london, he let it slip to someone, complaining about the inactivity of the lebanese ambassador. he said that it was very unpleasant

to feel alive, tied to a corpse, well, levinaga, naturally, quickly reported this, here a friend showed unprecedented activity. it is curious that this was facilitated by one insignificant incident, which, however, among the people surrounding the sovereign nikolai pavlovich, made me famous as a liberal, famous for that time very sad. once in a small retinue of emperor nikolai pavlovich

, count alexander christoforovich benkendor arrived in vienna. in the absence of the envoy, i, who was performing his duties as a senior adviser to the embassy, ​​hurried to the count. after a few cold phrases, without inviting me to sit down, he said: "please order the owner of the hotel, i have lunch today." i calmly approached the bell and called the metro to the hotel. "what does this mean?" the count asked angrily. benkendor. "nothing more, count, than that with the order for lunch, you can contact the metro dotel of the hotel yourself." this answer...

which gorchakov witnessed, in general this experience of sitting in germany gave him quite a lot, this is really so, he called himself connections, one of these connections in frankfurt, it was a connection with the future chancellor of germany, actually the creator of the german state from von bismarck, and bismarck listened attentively to gorchakov, he was not yet such a major figure then, as he would become in consequences, and some historians even call gorchakov bismarck's teacher, although this is probably all... some exaggeration, it must be said that gorchakov was an ardent opponent of the crimean war, in this sense, as was not silrode, but he was a man of the system and, of course, being an official, he could not resist it, he was inside the system, he worked in it and so on.

after the death of nicholas i, gorchakov, in fact, starts his career anew, and he, being in vienna, does one very important thing about... which is often forgotten, that's where the conditions were agreed upon under which the congress in paris was to be held, at which decisions were made on who should concede what to whom, and it was in vienna that gorchakov showed himself quite brightly, and was awarded the order of alexander nevsky for this, when he did not allow the most humiliating conditions for russia to begin peace negotiations, under conditions when sevastopol was surrendered, because the negotiations were still underway during the fighting. to insist on these insufficiently humiliating conditions from the point of view of england and france were important for russia, in particular gorchukov, he would also do this later, he played on the contradictions between the two opponents of russia, between england and france, these contradictions existed, it is enough to mention one, the english wanted to go further

into russia, and the french, who had suffered considerable losses, like the english at sevastopol, were generally skeptical about this , including because they had already once in... in russia in 812, so gorchakov was also able to play on these contradictions, er ready, if you see some gun on a helicopter, in an airplane, it is made at the tula instrument-making design bureau, zu-23 is installed, yes we had it on a kamaz, work on drones, yes we worked guys, today our main direction is anti-aircraft systems, pantsir is a whole family.

for the gunsmith's day, god of war, fire tamers. on wednesday on the first. hello, my dear ones, this is the most intense plot.

relatives, the season premiere is on saturday, on the first. beloved, beautiful, only wife, we continue our release, today in the center attention diplomat alexander gorchakov. gorchakov, having headed the ministry of foreign affairs, initially had the task, in general, not just to somehow correct the paris treaty, but simply to cancel it, it is interesting how he formulated it in a conversation with

pavel kiselev, who was appointed ambassador to france, he stated that he was looking for a person who would help him destroy the paragraphs of the paris treaty, that he was looking for him and would find him, in the sources he uses a different ending, that russia is concentrating, and more famous, it is better known, but this is strictly speaking.

russia concentrated for about three years, and then the same gorchakov declared: russia is leaving the position of restraint that it considered obligatory for itself after the crimean war. how was gorchakov supposed to undermine this most humiliating for russia paris peace? a bloc of powers formed against russia, one of which was austria, tyuchiv wrote, yes, when the austrian envoy came to the funeral of nicholas i, yes, away from the grave of the austrian judas. his boards, well, because shortly before that, russia - this is an important nuance - saved austria from

the hungarian revolution, leading its troops led by field marshal paskevich into hungary, defeating the hungarian insurgents, rebels, uh, supporters of the independence of the hungarian state, thanks to this, austria remained as a single power, and a few years later, literally, austria came out with a neutrality hostile to russia on the side, in fact, of england and france, forcing the withdrawal of troops from the danube.

since russia's interests coincided with france, or rather there was even such a story, they did not contradict the french, we had no intersections, except for france's participation in the crimean war, respectively. igorchakov played a subtle game to direct france's activity towards italy, to support italy's desire for the avura of the italian then prime minister, the creation of a single italian state,

while, of course, gorchakov, as a man of his time, could not support the italian grassroots resistance, i mean. garibaldi, especially since between nevertheless, gorchakov had connections with the italian insurgents and the polish rebels, yes, he did, yes, nevertheless he played the italian card quite subtly, but at least he managed to drive such a crack into the paris treaty, such a wedge into it, already at the end of the fifties, at the beginning of the sixties of the xix century. gorchakov outplayed the austrians, here nikolai. the first really wanted to punish the traitor austria with a shatyk, and gorchakov managed, without spilling a single drop, our soldier, to punish austria with the help of the french. the wedge was driven in, then his gorchakov expanded, then a secret treaty was signed between paris and

st. petersburg, and then the war between austria and france and piedmont began.

it was completely out of place, naturally, firstly, and the emperor quite rightly said that it was not impossible to carry out reforms against the backdrop of such internal turmoil, in fact, the poles had started another uprising, one of the arguments that

was, that russia is now restless, there, well, naturally, great reforms had begun, they cannot... contribute to stability, we must take advantage of this, therefore, in general , this struggle is a counter political game, the poles hoped that the great reforms would help them, because they would cause some kind of disorder in russia, and alexander ii harshly suppressed this uprising, believing that great reforms were necessary, and therefore... we must act harsher, but this suppression of the uprising, as often happened in our history, it ceased to be an exclusively internal matter.

spain, sweden, italy, the netherlands, portugal, even turkey, they shied away from participation, strictly speaking, in this onslaught, only belgium and switzerland, citing their neutrality, it seemed that, in general, another armada could come to the territory of russia, most of the concessions that the europeans offered to make to the poles.

more autonomy or something else, no, the poles wanted, as they themselves said, they strove to create a state independent from one sea to another, well, and if so, our diplomacy said, then guys, well today they demand this, tomorrow they will demand the annexation of those lands where a lot of russians and orthodox, and then they will demand the lands that...

this is a historical podcast russia-west on the swings of history, we continue the conversation about the brilliant diplomat, i'm not even saying that all the arguments that... the russian foreign ministry used during this period were absolutely correct. i want to draw attention to how much the tone of these conversations with europe has changed. europe could argue, but there was no reason to fight. this was already, i repeat, it was not nicholas i, not alexander ii.

the emperors of austria by the russian emperor, and there these between the german emperor, the austrian and prussia visited petersburg, then return visits were given. but this alliance turned out to be short-lived, the fact is that in 1875 ott von bismerg decided that it was time to finish off france, there was already a successful war,

france was humiliated, france was almost knocked out of the concert of great powers, after a shameful defeat, the capture of the emperor, the emperor accordingly died, in france there was a revolution, the paris commune, bismerg decided that france was weak now, alone, no one would stand up for it, it could be finished off in order to... achieve hegemony in fact in central, in western europe, germany, a united germany. austria at that time was already in fact the tail of the german empire, which was going in the direction that set the german empire, their forces were incommensurate after austria's defeat by prussia during the wars for the unification of the german state. and then gorchakov. gorchakov, in fact, did not issue ultimatums, but he made it very clear well bismarck, made it clear.

the seizure of turkish possessions will not be allowed by the great powers and accordingly it is not worth getting involved in this war, in russia at that time there was a very strong patriotic upsurge, the most diverse people, just slavophile-minded, what you were talking about, yes they talked about the need to support the slavic brothers, the bulgarian brothers there and so on and so forth, in the end not immediately alexander ii hesitated for a long time, but in the end he decided, and despite the skeptical attitude towards this even of the minister of war dmitry

milyutin, russia entered the... war, war cost a lot, 250 thousand russian soldiers, of which only 50,000 died from bullets, bayonets , saber strikes, and 2,000 died from difficult conditions, from illness, from the cold, the famous shipka seat, and so on. after that , russia concludes the san stefano treaty. according to the san stefano treaty, serbia and montenegro are independent, bulgaria is actually independent, well, it has a very broad autonomy, pays a symbolic tribute to turkey. in fact , things were also moving towards the independence of romania. turkey was deprived of territories in europe, almost lost territories in europe, in general, russian troops did not enter constantinople, as it was then called in russia, or istanbul, only because england and france, primarily england, spoke out sharply against it, respectively, brought in their fleet, brought it to the actual site of military operations, and in order not to be at odds with these powers, russia, accordingly, did not capture constantinople, istanbul, although the opportunities for this

were already there, not just opportunities. with difficulty did not capture, they grabbed at every bush, so that the turks had already fled, but after the san stefano peace, russia was forced, again a concert of great powers again as then in crimea, again because of turkey, and gorchakov warned, united against russia and the conditions of the san stefano peace were considered preliminary and the berlin congress was convened, as a result the territory of bulgaria was cut in half, and... it was divided into three parts: one autonomy, broad autonomy from turkey, another part eastern rumelia, a principality under the protection of turkey and the third part macedonia remains under turkey. the territories were cut up so that the bulgarian territories became part of romania a little bit, part of serbia, which later laid the foundations for the balkan wars. turkey retained a number of possessions, including albania. in general, such a sweet story was made, which later

did. russia's contribution was sharply reduced, and russia was forced to give up a number of territories in transcaucasia. gorchakov was then in the berlin congress, he is 82 years old. bismarg was younger. bismarg pretended that he was honest a broker, an honest broker, in fact, he played, of course, on the side of england and france, to take revenge on russia for the seventy-fifth year, and in order to prevent the strengthening of russia, significant, therefore, this mine, accordingly, under the future european peace was. here pushkin , one can say, it turned out that he wrote lines that just concern gorchakov directly, he was the last of the graduates

. tsarskoye selo lyceum. and so pushkin wrote: "who of us in old age will have to celebrate the day of the lyceum alone." unhappy friend, among new generations, a tiresome guest and superfluous, and a stranger, he will remember us and the days of the unions, closing his eyes with a trembling hand. well, absolutely, directly, he, no one knew that gorchakov would be the last, but he turned out to be.

actually, this is how he will remain in our history, i agree, and here , finishing, we can quote gorchakov himself, he recalled, i am the first in my... "study history with us, you can watch all the episodes of the podcast russia-west on the swings of history on the website of the first channel,

this is a must read podcast, yana batnikova, and today we will discuss the book by clarice pencola, es'. awakening the wild woman in yourself, and what is a wild woman barbarian? well clarice estos characterizes her as a kind of universal, such a global, many-faced, thousand-faced female archetype, personifying female strength, some kind of female power, some kind of connection with such

a deep self, but i would call it, that she probably refers to the category of such a feminine self, that is, some kind of such a true state of deep contact with oneself and at the same time with something so superior, our ego, with something, probably, divine transcendental, she draws a lot of parallels, says that the primordial woman has many names and lists them, that she could be counted as gikata, and as nike, the goddess of the night, and as aphrodite and as a spider grandmother, in general, she draws many parallels and says that yes, a wild woman is some kind of powerful, internal and at the same time external, transcendental feminine force, isn't it dangerous to awaken this wild woman in yourself, that is i can't imagine, i woke up a wild woman and i read this book, it says that if you want to roll on your back, if you want to growl, if you want to scream, then you should not deny yourself this, here's how to combine this with the rules of good manners in society for a woman, i would say that clarice estos uses

a metaphor here, what she describes, she really compares a wild woman to a she-wolf, but she does not really suggest literalizing this practice of running, well excuse me, naked in the woods, for example, it's a pity, well, by the way, some people understand it literally. playing out some kind of internal through the external, that is, it's ritualization, but otherwise, i would say that it's more of a metaphor for such a healthy psychological state, it gives very clear characteristics of what a healthy wild woman is, it's a woman who looks like a healthy she-wolf, who loves to hunt, play.

who tells us how to navigate normally in this world to keep mental health. clarissa pencola is a phd, a very educated woman, and yet she is trying to find some truth, the truth - in some fairy tales, ancient legends, that is, she is also an ethnographer. how was this book written, as i understand it, it was going to be distributed in different parts of the world, that is, it was not like clarissa sat down and made up a plan for the chapters. she wrote a plan for the chapters for herself, no, how was this book created? initially, it existed in the form of podcasts and clarissa created it for her daughters, what does that mean? well, first of all, she has daughters herself, that is, she began to write down stories for her own daughters and for

those women whom she called her daughters, for example, she is still the director of such a community of the virgin mary of guadubskaya, this is a community organized by chicana women, chicanos are women immigrants... from mexico to the usa, and accordingly she began to write down these supporting stories, analyze these tales, in order to specifically provide some kind of spiritual support to other women who needed it and indeed it turns out to be such a fusion of ethnography, folklore studies, literary analysis and deep psychology on the one hand, clarissa herself even said that she fills the space between the pillars of classical psychology, that is, at some point she discovered that classical psychology simply discovered that it does not satisfy some of the needs of the female soul, plus she...

this is precisely the space between, here she simultaneously felt this space between in general in science, in science and in psychology. fairy tales are a healing thing, or well, that is, what place do fairy tales occupy in jungian analysis? yes, indeed, fairy tales are used as a tool for working with the psyche, for influencing the psyche, and well , here to larisa, yes, of course, exclusively healing or.

yes, yes, yes, it can, that is, a fairy tale is very multifaceted, it can be viewed from really different angles, here is one of the angles under here is the optics that is used estes, this is what a fairy tale unfolds before us a theater on our soul, and the relationships between our different parts, which are more personal and which have more to do with the collective unconscious, well, roughly speaking, how does our soul relate to the collective soul , including? well, here is bluebeard, let's talk about this plot, it is basically known to many, bluebeard. this is some strange man, who is rich, interesting,

educated, who asks for the hand of three sisters, and one of them marries him married, and uh he gives her the keys to his household one key to a room that can't be opened when her sisters come to visit, they are all very curious together, they still climb into this room and find the corpses of his previous wives, and after that they try to hide from him... this knowledge, but the key bleeds from this room, and bluebeard finds out, naturally, that his order was violated, yes, the violation of a taboo, there is a very important detail of this tale, about what happens when you violate, for example, a taboo, including what happens if a woman breaks a taboo and touches some, partly hidden knowledge about what can happen to a woman's soul, in principle, what dangers are hidden, well, this is some kind of predator that... lives in every soul, and it can also be understood not only as

an unscrupulous man who behaves abusively and cruelly, but it can also be understood as some kind of internal obstacle, an internal complex that prevents a woman from expressing herself, looking at the world without illusions, something like that, yes, in general, what does estes herself think about this, that's who the blue one is beard, she calls it the principle of counter-nature, the principle that goes against nature or the shadow side of the self , that is, we are accustomed to thinking that... that the self is only light, this is the creative flow, this is something transcendental, but it also has its own shadow, this blue beard, the inner predator, this is the messenger of the shadow part of the self, that is, indeed , every person, regardless of his gender, has this very inner predator, whose real task is to lead himself astray, somehow destroy, suppress, lock up, restrict, and accordingly, the only thing, i might add, is that in our culture, for example, there is... jungian analyst verena kast, modern, she,

for example, includes the blue beard in the cultural attitude, which is generally negatively disposed towards women, seeks to restrict them. it seems to me that the true essence of the blue beard, it lies somewhere at the intersection of these two points of view, that it is a natural some kind of property of any human psyche, that everything has a shadow side, here it is the messenger of this shadow side, and at the same time it is really a cultural attitude that in many ways limits women, their creative self-expression. limits or generally it attacks them, that is, it is negatively disposed towards them, you are doing badly, whatever you do, yes, you are not talented enough, not professional enough, that is, this inner voice is negative - this is bluebeard. they say, yes, his voice, that is, it often takes the form of devaluing voices, these same inner critics are notorious, yes, that you are not good enough at this, you will never be able to realize yourself, you are incapable of anything, yes, a loser, stay at home, in general and in principle this is very often broadcast by modern culture, that a woman is not good enough for something, well, i

want to say that when i just now reread this fairy tale performed by clarice pinkola stesa, she changed it a little.

he promised him to give him what is behind his mill, the old woman promised him everything in exchange, in general, material goods, when the miller returned home, it turned out that he promised this old man, under whom the devil was actually hiding, that is, some kind of evil entity, an evil predator, his daughter, when the time came, the devil came for his reward, but

the girl, on the one hand, obediently agreed to follow her father's will, on the other hand, she cried so bitterly that the devil she was... so pure that the devil simply could not approach her, in a rage he demanded that the father cut off the girl's hands and kicked her out of the house, well, what, actually, the conscientious father did, uh, and the girl went, having lost her hands, into exile, got in that beautiful garden, the so-called selewa, laselyeva tsuttaraneyu, an underground forest, where she met an angel in the company, yes, yes, she also had an angel as an assistant there, and there she met a beautiful king, whom she married, but the devil could not leave her alone, he continued to pursue her, only... now he chose a different tactic, he began to replace the letters that the ghanaians sent from the queen to the king from the young woman according to pushkin's fairy tale, we also have this motive, yes the queen gave birth at night, either a son or a daughter, yes there they also replace letters, distorted the truth, and but we get in pushkin's plot the king was led,

the king was led, he was very indignant and expelled his own, well, his wife and son, then here the king was very upset. and when he returned and discovered that his letters had been replaced, he went in search of his wife and child, eventually found them, spent 7 years searching, yes, yes, they were reunited again, and what can we read through this tale, what parts of our unconscious, our soul does it tell about, well, clarice estos herself, she notes that this particular tale is more global than the same bluebeard, that is, bluebeard describes some one-time stage of female individuation, here is a specific one, and the girl without arms, and... it is so much more extensive, it captures a long period of this female wandering, actually its first part is again dedicated to the internal predator in the person of the devil, what is happening, well, the father also does not behave very kindly to him.