only holes, their sizes are the same, is it possible to assume which of the paths had a greater chance of growing the brain to our intellectual state, in fact , the intellectualization of animals is also a rather slippery question, because we are very smart, yes, but among mammals in general there are also quite primitive ones in terms of intelligence, stupid ones, we will call them animals, such as a mouse or a vole, while birds that went along a branch. sid, there are also extremely smart ones, for example, some corvids, they solve puzzles at the level of three-year-old children, which most mammals cannot cope with, the level of intelligence and brain development, it is apparently unpredictable, it is formed in different groups, depending on the need for its formation, because it seems to us that the brain is intelligence, it is very important, but by and large it would only interfere with most animals, what... the level of intelligence

is necessary in order to survive, you need to be a little smarter than what you eat, if, let's say you're a herbivore, you eat grass, then being too smart is actually expensive, there won't be enough grass, you have to the contrary, not overload yourself with intellectual activity, otherwise you'll die of hunger, this is for animals, for people, yes, yes, yes, dear viewers, listeners, please don't take this as a recommendation from biologists. egor, i have a question for you that we got from school literature. why don't people fly, but in a biological sense, could such a developed organism as a human, well, with such intelligence, develop from some kind of flying creatures, we still don't have a clear answer, because again, among birds there are also highly intelligent individuals, the same crows, which generally cope, we don't know, unfortunately, what is generally necessary for the emergence of reason, why...

this is what the ghouls say, yes, that's absolutely right, there are a lot of dinosaurs, until now this is one of the generally dominant representatives of our fauna, dinosaurs and meat is sold in any supermarket, because birds are, without jokes, full-fledged dinosaurs, and this is very funny, and there are two groups of dinosaurs, birds pelvic and pelvic lizards, guess who modern birds belong to, naturally to pelvic lizards, lizard-pelvic, birds are... and

we talk about ourselves about life from the point of view of biology, look, egor, you just drank some water and demonstrated to us a part, i would even say not of the earthly, but of the cosmic process, after all, life is water, we consist of water and... like all living things, once came out of this water, in this very water all the chemistry necessary for the formation of life was once dissolved, in principle, the presence of liquid water is the main criterion, which we now apply to planets, we roughly assume whether life can arise on them or not, there is a very interesting concept, it is called, well, in russian the habitable zone, well, it is somehow dry, scientific, there is a more lyrical name zone. the thing

is that a planet can be at different distances from its star, and if it is too close, then it is too hot, the water boils away, it is not in liquid form, too far, it is too cold, it will be bound by ice, there is only a narrow strip, again for each star it will be in its place, but only in this narrow strip will be the orbit of the planet, if then there will be liquid water on it, why actually the goldilocks zone, because this is the english-language analogue of our fairy tale masha. three bears, everyone remembers what the trick is there? too hot porridge, too cold porridge, porridge is just right, here is the goldilocks zone, i recommend remembering it in this terminology, it is much more pleasant, our solar system, of course, we are in the goldilocks zone, surprisingly mars is also here, well then there is if we go to the historians of our existence, to our deep ancestors, then the relationship with water arose billions of years ago, and it is not a fact that even on... yes,

that is absolutely right, the thing is that for a chemical reaction to become possible, and we still have this set, although very complex, but nevertheless chemical reactions, these chemical reactions must occur in some medium. and water is a wonderful medium for this, it will not work in dry form, in the form of ice, of course, there is also some probability in gaseous form, but again, all this will work much worse, besides, the gaseous form requires heating, complex chemistry will not work there, it will be destroyed, and we end up with what we have: a narrow strip, liquid and the chemistry that is inside us, well, not every liquid, because if you had kerosene or ammonia or something else there. i think the reactions would not go so briskly to grow from bacteria to a person? i don’t agree here, maybe it really is soft and would be too heavy for especially if it were whole ocean on our planet, but we could assume the theoretical emergence

of life in another liquid, for example in the same kerosene, kerosene is organic, well, over time i suppose, something could start there, okay, i'm returning to our today with... in the morning we woke up, breathed, this may still be and we will move on to this, then we, in addition to a glass of water, coffee, tea, i don't know what we usually drink in the morning, also had breakfast, well, a sandwich with sausage, may vegetarians forgive us, when did we learn, our distant ancestors, learned to process, rather complex substances, like the same sausage, if we simply ask ourselves when nutrition first appeared, well, it has always existed, there is a very beautiful phrase about what nutrition is, nutrition is the search of an electron for its stable state, because processes are going on inside us, inside each of our cells, inside the very first cells on earth, these processes, essentially chemical, require

the transfer of an electron from one to another, so that proteins can be synthesized, dna can be doubled here is all this internal molecular kitchen of ours to do, so in search of this electron it... from where only life did not get it - the first bacteria are considered to have got it by oxidizing iron, because iron was then quite a lot dissolved in the ocean, here are those layers of iron that we now get from the earth, in many ways this is sedimented from the primary ocean already under the influence of life layers, there are even bacteria that can feed on electron directly, that is , bacteria essentially feed on electricity, you can connect them to the pluses and minuses, they they will build a power line from their own... electrons will run, and this will be enough energy. it is more complicated when we imagine nutrition, yes, that we chew and swallow something, it appeared, accordingly, also later, but the principle is the same: when we eat something, we first simply break it down

into the simplest possible components, these components, for example, glucose, get into our each individual cell, and there this glucose is burned by oxygen, we... we constantly in each cell we send both glucose and oxygen through breathing, essentially the same thing happens as in any oven, oxidation is like fire, of course, it does not look like sparks or fire inside us, it is a chemical process, but from the point of view of the chemical formula it is identical to combustion, on the released energy, again we get our electron, we can either store it or spend it on synthesizing some protein, this is what we live on. but look, here is our breakfast, which consists on one hand of water, on the other hand of sandwich with sausage, well and when it is weighty, the air that we breathe, oxygen, others had the same, from the very beginning there was this scheme, oxygen breathing, of course, no, it

appeared, well, relative to most of the guys on this slide quite late, as i already said, on the primary this very earth, in the era of the hadean, archean, at... the conditions were not the same as now, basically they fed, apparently, microorganisms on what was dissolved in water by chemosynthesis, but as soon as it exhausted itself, as soon as the amount of iron in dissolved in the ocean dropped to a certain level, it was necessary to look for something else, photosynthetics appeared, those who learned to use the energy of sunlight for exactly the same thing, in order to get an electron for themselves, and the by-product of this reaction was oxygen, now for us it is synonymous with life. but in general, initially the most terrible poison is an oxidizer of everything, as soon as oxygen began to be released in sufficient quantities, all the remaining iron in the ocean instantly self-oxidized, everyone who oxidized iron also oxidized and this, probably, can be called one of the first global extinctions, when oxygen from some

bacteria killed, i don’t know, 90 percent of all the others, as in general, here’s the scheme, who became food, who became the eater, or was it... well, we said that oxygen itself began to form on earth, oxygen, as soon as it ceased to be the most terrible poison, as soon as those who were accustomed to it appeared, immediately there was an opportunity. to use it, and one of the main uses of oxygen is to grab something inside itself with oxygen to oxidize, then the same thing we do until now, those bacteria appeared that started doing it this way, taking ready-made organic matter from photosynthetics, why try to do it yourself when you can take it, take the oxygen that they received, essentially direct photosynthesis in the opposite direction, if photosynthesis is water, carbon dioxide, organic matter, oxygen, then you and i, most other animals do exactly the opposite: we take organic matter, oxygen

, start the process in the other direction, we get water, carbon dioxide, what you and i exhale, in this regard, nutrition has not changed no one else, we all do the same thing as those bacteria that have learned to survive with oxygen. moreover, the very formation of our cells, this is the so -called symbiogenesis, that is, one cell... we now know that it was apparently some ancient archaea, also a single-celled one, it ate this bacterium that can use oxygen and did not digest it, but left it inside itself as a separate organ, and these oxygen-using bacteria are still among us, these are our mitochondria inside each of our cells in essence there is a symbiont bacteria, and it is not a stretch to say symbion, they have their own dna, here we have our main dna in the nucleus. in the mitochondria their own, they have their own membranes, they themselves can

somehow communicate and reproduce inside the cells, now all this together is called the mitochondria, and studying the population of mitochondria in cells, we come to some new approach to the treatment of some diseases, because in fact mitochondrial diseases are an extremely difficult thing, it turns out that the way we eat, it appeared as itself principle, how many billions are there? did these two sexes appear and how inevitable was it, in general, what we can call

a sexual process, even asexuals have it , after all, when there are two sexes, when bacteria, because any sexual process is an exchange of genes, and this is incredibly important, to pass on a piece of hereditary information to someone, this is essentially passing on to someone the ability to make a new protein, and even primitive cells, well, after all, having a nucleus, that is, primitive unicellular eocryotes, some amoeba already... have it all variety of sexual processes that we can imagine. it was bound to happen. sexual reproduction has a lot of advantages. first of all, when we inherit a genome from both parents, mom and dad, we get a double set of genes. if one gene breaks, there is a second spare. mutation or loss of a chromosome, we do not die. secondly, we can get the opportunity to be even stronger. changes while one gene is slowly turning into something new,

there is a second one that its activity compensates. well, finally, the most important thing, and we can constantly receive a completely crazy and diverse set of genes in each subsequent generation. if we did not have sexual reproduction, we would, well, let's say, be produced asexually from one parent, we would be too similar, we would be, roughly speaking, genetically identical clones and any virus, any bacteria that was simply guessed, we would be mowed down immediately, this was the case, for example, with bananas, because bananas are clones, here are several types of banana we have lost simply because an epidemic happened, and no one has protection, in contrast to this, with our method, with sexual reproduction, the combination is such that no matter what terrible threat comes to us, i don’t know, plague, cholera, covid, in any case we will have some people, some representatives who...

an endangered species, but obvious advantages balance out obvious disadvantages, we could technically even imagine that there would be more sexes, there are three or four, there are four individuals who must be collected with four. everyone will agree, while everyone is deciding something, nothing would work out, there would already be much more disadvantages than advantages, therefore , two sexes, and as we see, in the development of life on the planet. an excellent number, it turned out really well, well, how good, after all, it is not economical, yes, diversity, but let's say, take you and me, we seem to belong to the male sex, from the point of view of biology, we are quite useless creatures, we passed on our genome, in principle, we could already go to the female's food, so that she could continue to grow kids, but we eat, run, do something,

why, why do we need males, yes, why do we need males, if we are talking about any animal population, well, how many are there? we need males, ideally, one would be enough, and almost all species give birth to the same number of them as females, so when these males were born, and looked at each other, and realized all this, they immediately began to bite each other, quarreled, went to colonize new lands, to feed predators with them, this is an expendable material of evolution, but why is this cool, because it allows, with the advent of sexual reproduction, to obtain changes in an entire species in one snap of the fingers, in one generation, let's say, there is some... let's say it's a population of deer, the conditions they have now are such that they need the strongest ones, so that there is a large muscle mass, accordingly, all the deer quarreled with each other in intrasexual competition, fought, only the strongest of them stood out, left offspring, here is an entire population, there is conditionally almost the entire species, yes, now the next generation is a little stronger, in another i don't know, a miserable 100

years the conditions change, and now what is needed is not the strongest, but the fastest or the smartest. again within one generation the intrasexual competition has weeded out this very best by a new feature, only he has set up offspring, now the whole species begins to change in the other direction, as soon as sexual reproduction appears, the sexual process, our rate of change of species, it simply reaches almost the first cosmic, and we can literally in a few generations get completely new ones interesting forms, well, there are more conservative species, where the female, having received... needs a genome from a male, simply eats it and gets protein, yes, in fact, there are questions here, in different animals, they are solved differently, what to do with a male who has done his duty, well, you can't throw him away , it's a pity, yes, why, why, what to feed, many species really, as if they are sent straight to the trash, in humans everything is a little

different in every sense, it is wrong to compare people with other animals, because we have gone down the path, again, not physiological changes, but the transfer of knowledge, and this is directly reflected in our biology, for example, people live longer than a mammal of our size should live, some horse, it is larger, but it lives less, and why? because for us people the most profitable populations were those where there are long-livers, who can pass on the accumulated skills and knowledge, this is more important than even the transfer of genes. and we are now inclined to preserve all men and women, why? because even if a man will no longer reproduce there, let's say, he already left offspring, he will still be useful to society, he will be useful to the population and evolutionarily there was a selection for long-livers, including men, it turned out well, great, a little more about

men, why does this man need such a crazy thing? it will not mislead anyone, and this tail, of course, it seriously reduces the peacock's fitness, he runs worse, hides worse, flies worse, but the females like it, and why, what is their logic, in fact, there are several assumptions why exactly they like this females, why did they

prefer such males, as a result the whole species became like this, on the one hand predators like brighter females like brighter. coincidence? yes, a coincidence, very funny. and, in fact, there are two approaches. the first, the so-called handicap principle. handicap is also a handicap, when the strong gives an advantage to the weak. here we look at two runners, they run at the same speed, but one is still dragging a sack of coal. it is immediately clear which of them is cooler. the same thing here. roughly speaking, the female looks at this and, well, sort of thinks, wow, we have plenty predators, full of parasites, life is not a bed of roses. if you manage to drag such a thing along with you and survive, well... roughly speaking, one day a gene for a bright, lush tail will accidentally appear, at that moment, again, let's assume, a gene for loving a bright, lush tail

will appear in a female, then in the population these two genes will hook onto each other, all the time only females will appear who love a lush tail, all the time only males will appear, in whom this gene develops even more strongly, an even more lush tail, and these two genes, having hooked onto each other, friend, well, in general, they will bring the situation to the point of absurdity, that is, i will say a crucial thing, that in general from the point of view of biology... as i understand it, the basic version is that the female, and the male is such an object of experiments, expendable material and other bells and whistles, well , again, it’s not that it was probably intended that way, but in the end it turned out that way, there are species that are a little the other way around, for example, seahorses, in them the male is engaged in, in essence, incubation, he carries fertilized eggs with him, and there the situation is the opposite, there the females are among themselves they fight, that's all that suffers. in the battle for the male, look, here's another example of a completely useless device, giant antlers, how does he run with such,

first of all, he doesn't run anymore, in fact, antlers, you have to understand that deer do not primarily use them to protect themselves, say, from predators, yes, they don't help him survive, namely in the wild, antlers are needed to fight off their own kind, to collide in... with other deer first of all, the female will look at this in theory and choose the one who won. as a result, we see selection for ever increasing antlers, and indeed this is a whole genus of giant deer, whose antlers were wider than they themselves were in length, that is, such a thing that ran a little against the laws of aerodynamics, with the wide part forward it moved, and as soon as the forests grew, for example, here in siberia, all these deer lay down. in one geological section they disappear very quickly, it is clear that the pole cannot run with such a thing, it would seem, like an evolutionary transformation, like there are some behind this mechanisms, but it turned out to be a terrible minus,

because unfortunately, evolution does not know the right decisions, it goes through everything in a row, whoever survived, won, did not survive , no luck, they were unlucky, probably, you can say, out of happiness, their own females brought them to this, but as i understand it, in our species there is still not only ... as a competition of horns, tails, but also a competition of intellects and other functions important for our species. absolutely right, everything that we say about evolutionary laws and mechanisms in animals, it, of course, has some reflection on people, but for people everything is always different, we have too big differences from the basic survival in the forest, these principles worked for us 100% when we, like other mammals... let's say, ran through the forests without clothes, but with the advent of intelligence everything changed, now we do not need to change physiologically to change the environment around us, we do not need wool, we

do not need the evolutionary selection of the hairiest, we can make clothes, we do not need there the evolutionary selection for strength, we can make weapons, tools, intelligence becomes the dominant thing, since we started talking about evolution in relation to humans, i recall a word, probably familiar as... as an analogue of a gene, but already about culture, about education, about information, indeed, this is a very good analogy on the part of dukins, how in principle can we explain the course of evolutionary changes, i will explain, let's imagine a joke, let's say i just made it up and i tell it to my friends, if the joke is funny, roughly speaking, they are incapable, what will they do, will they retell it further, maybe they will add something from themselves, the joke will become funnier, that is, a mutation will occur, which will affect the increase

in viability, there are already several forms of this joke, we tell them in different ways, at the same time there is, and the funniest one, displaces in people's minds, all the others, this is what we are now seeing, happening on the internet very quickly with the same memes, they appear, evolve, consolidate the most... viable, and this is exactly the same as the information recorded inside our dna changed. they appear by random selection all possible forms, but only those most adapted to the specific conditions of what is happening now will have the opportunity to change and reproduce further, to obtain new forms, and the rest will, unfortunately, be discarded. that is, it turns out that when you are now watching and listening to us, dear viewers and listeners, and click on the repost, you are actually... from other

people, i would say, in this is precisely the intellectual forces of humanity, having learned to transmit information in this oral way, we have collected a certain set knowledge, yes, a set of skills, all this intangible, verbal, which are now evolving, independently of us, on us, we are like a substrate for all these ideas, and yes, we are now distributing them, again, someone, if they retell, will add something from themselves, all this is necessary. this biological creature, and not a candidate of biological sciences? in fact, i feel regularly, if we try to track some of our actions, deeds, desires, then in any case we run into their material...

requires the power of biology with you, all episodes of the podcast schrödinger's cat you can find on the website of the first channel 1tv.ru, this podcast is a must-read, i am aglana batnikova, and today we will discuss the book "

spinkola stes, running with the wolves" with the jungian analyst, writer varvara popova. varvara, hello. good evening. the book by clarice pencola stes, running with the wolves is a modern work, but it is a collection of fairy tales with an analysis of the jungian analyst, right? well, yes, with an expanded commentary by the jungian analyst and with a lot some additions, other interesting nuances. on women on awakening the wild woman in themselves, and what is a wild woman barbarian? well, clarice estos characterizes her as a kind of universal, global, multifaceted, thousand-faced female archetype, personifying female strength, some kind of female power, some kind of connection with such a deep self, but i would call it that she probably refers to the category of such a feminine self, that is, some kind of true state of deep contact with oneself and at the same time with something like that

superior. ours is the ego, that is, something, probably, divine transcendent. she draws a lot of parallels, says that the primordial woman has many names and lists them and that she could be revered as gikata, and as nike, the goddess of the night, and as aphrodite and as a spider grandmother, in general, she draws many parallels and says that yes, a wild woman is some kind of powerful, internal and at the same time external, transcendental female force. isn't it dangerous to awaken this wild woman in yourself, that is, i can't imagine, here i woke up a wild woman and... and i read this book, and it says that if you want to roll on your back, if you want to growl, if you want to scream, then you should not deny yourself this, here is how to combine this with the rules of good manners in society for a woman, i would say that clarissa estos uses a metaphor here, what she describes, she really compares a wild woman to a she-wolf, but she does not really suggest literalizing this practice of running, well, forgive me, naked forests, for example, it's a pity, well...

to hunt, to play, to love their offspring and their partners, in general, it's about some very, rather healthy internal setting, and probably also about a connection with some instinctive nature, that's why she uses the image of an animal, that an animal, it somehow understands very well where to run, who to hunt, which one, what kind of grass is poisonous, where you can drink from, yes, if these are hunters, then you need

to run away from hunters, that is, most likely she means this one. she is trying find some truth, the truth - in some fairy tales, ancient legends, that is, she is also an ethnographer, how was this book written, she, as i understand it, was going to spread out in different parts of the world, that is, it was not like clarissa sat down and wrote a plan of chapters in order, no, how was this book created, initially it existed in the form of podcasts, and clarissa created it for her daughters, what does this mean, well, she? firstly, she herself has daughters, that is, she began to write down history for her own daughters, and for those women whom she called her daughters, for example, she is still the director of such a community of the virgin mary of gvodubskaya, this is a community

organized by chicana women, chicana are women immigrants from mexico to the united states, and accordingly she began to write down these supporting stories, analyze these tales in order to provide some kind of spiritual support. to other women who needed it, and she really gets such an alloy, with on the one hand ethnography, folklore studies, literary analysis and depth psychology, clarissa herself even said that she fills the space between the pillars of classical psychology, that is , at some point she discovered that classical psychology simply found gaps to not gaps, that it does not satisfy some of the needs of the female soul, plus she separately emphasized that she herself is not a woman of european origin, and that something from classical european psychology, it simply does not fit, we representatives of other nationalities, because they have some other basis, another

culture, in general, not everything turned out to be suitable for everything, and i really liked this metaphor, that yes, there are crowds, and there is what is between them, this space between, it generally occupies a very important place in the work of klaisa herself, because she mentions the so-called world between. mothers, dual citizenship, this is exactly the space between, she simultaneously felt this space between in general in science, in science and in psychology. fairy tales are a healing thing, or well, that is, what place do fairy tales occupy in jungian analysis? yes, indeed, fairy tales are used as a tool for working with the psyche, for influencing the psyche, well, here's to larisa healing effect. exclusively healing or educational. clarissa estos, by the way, she does not dwell on this, but she says that fairy tales have different purposes. there are really directly healing fairy tales, and there are fairy tales that are such fairy tales-instructions, like this works, yes, how it works, that we

consider all the characters of the fairy tale as different structures of our psyche, as different images of our soul, which are in some kind of relationship with each other, that is, the fairy tale does not embody the relationship between man and society, but rather. it can, that is, the fairy tale is very multifaceted, it can be viewed from really different angles, here is one of the angles, here is the optics that estes uses, is that the fairy tale unfolds before us a theater on our soul and the relationship between our different parts, which are more personal, which have more to do with the collective unconscious, well, roughly speaking, how our soul relates to the collective soul , including, well, here is bluebeard, let's talk about this plot, it is basically for many.

a predator who lives in every soul, and it can also be understood not only as an unscrupulous man who behaves abusively and cruelly, but it can also be understood as a kind of internal obstacle, an internal complex that prevents a woman

from expressing herself, looking at the world without illusions, something like that, yes, yes, in general, what does estes herself think about this, this is who bluebeard is, she calls it the principle of contranature, the principle that goes against nature or the shadow side. selfhood, that is, we are accustomed to thinking that selfhood is only light, this is the creative flow, this is something transcendental, but it also has its own shadow, this bluebeard is an internal predator, this is the messenger of the shadow part of the selfhood, that is... every person, regardless of his gender, has this very internal predator, whose real task is - to lead oneself astray, to destroy in some way, to suppress, to lock up, to limit, and accordingly, the only thing, i might add, is that in our culture, for example, there is a takayan analyst verena kast, a modern one, she, for example, includes the blue beard in the cultural attitude, which is generally negatively disposed towards women, seeks to limit them, it seems to me that... the true essence of the blue beard, it lies somewhere at the intersection of these two

points of view, that it is both a natural some kind of property, of any human psyche, that he has a shadow country for everything, here he is the messenger of this shadow country, and at the same time this is really a cultural attitude that in many ways limits women, limits their creative self-expression or generally attacks them, that is, it is negatively disposed towards them, you are doing it badly, whatever you do, yes, you are not talented enough, not professional enough, that is, this inner voice is negative. this is blue beard, roughly speaking, yes, his voice, that is, it often takes the form of devaluing voices, that is these same internal critics will say, yes, that you are not good enough at this, you will never be able to realize yourself, you yourself are not capable of anything, yes, a loser, sit at home, in general and in principle this is very often broadcast by modern culture, that a woman is not good enough for something, but i want to say that when i was just now rereading this fairy tale performed by clarissa pinkola.

i knew, but she has to know this, that is , she has to, including this

bleeding key, this knowledge, from which a woman has no right to turn away, having comprehended it, having known it, she can no longer unsee it, cannot forget it, another well-known fairy tale, for example, ae armless, yeah, armless girl, yeah, what 's going on there, barbara, tell me, well, in general, there lived a miller, uh, he had no work, one day he went somewhere on his business, met an old man and made a kind of deal with them, he promised him to give him what was behind his mill, and the old man promised him everything in exchange, in general material goods, when miller returned home, it turned out that he had promised this old man, under whom the devil was actually hiding, that is, some kind of evil entity, an evil predator, his daughter, when the time came, the devil came for his reward, but the girl, on the one hand, obediently agreed to follow her father's will, on the other hand, she was so bitter...

very upset, and when he returned and

discovered that his letters had been replaced, he went in search of his wife and child, eventually he found them, yes, they were again reunited, and what can we read through this tale, what parts of our unconscious, our soul does it tell about, well, clarice estos herself, she notes that this particular tale is more global than the same bluebeard, that is, bluebeard describes some one-time stage of female individuation, that is, a specific one. and the handless maiden, it is so much more extensive, it captures a long period of this female journey, in fact, its first part is again dedicated to the inner predator in the person of the devil, what is happening, yes, and... so-called unsuccessful deal, that is , some kind of such choice that a woman makes, which leads her to a state where the devil begins to hunt her, as a rule, this unsuccessful deal, it can look like, well, i don’t know, a rejection

of her creative ideas, some kind of choice, well, i don’t know, in favor of social approval instead of living her life radova. notes that yes, firstly, without exception , all women make an unsuccessful deal one way or another, sooner or later everyone goes through yes, sooner or later they sign this pact with the devil, but this deal is paradoxically useful, because through it a woman finally understands what she really needs, that is, she understood how she does not need it, and then she begins to look for how she really needs it, how her arms grow at the end of this fairy tale.

really new cast, about this and much more in the program to live is great, tomorrow on the first, choir, premiere of a multi-part film, tomorrow after the program time, this podcast is definitely about...

not only a jungian analyst, she is also a curandera, a mexican healer, that is what her ethnographic component of work is, that is the work of a curandera, and she uses some traditional, let's say, techniques, yes, common, as i understand it, that in mexico or among hungarian emigrants, with whom she also interacted closely to restore some kind of connection with the soul, that is, this is literally work, including with hands, well, the slavic peoples also have such practices, i...

actions, at this moment some very big, important, but still unconscious work is happening inside you, well, you fall into a trance in this state , healing of some parts of your soul occurs, restoration occurs, that is , in order to heal, it is not necessary to constantly feel it, so it has healed there, we are already taking off the belt early, you can shift the focus of attention, for example, to needlework, on the contrary, it is better to do something accompanying, and not constantly. try to check what is there, how am i doing, well, telling stories is a spiritual practice, we can do that, i think yes, of course, because there are traditions, including how to tell them correctly, even here, well, in russia, yes, for example, the guslars, how they told stories, it was a whole, well, in general a specially designed action, therefore yes, just telling and

just listening to stories is already healing, even if.