well, i'm sorry, i left your father, forever, and i needed a job and a place to live, here, closer to you, wash the fruit properly. go away from here, it's not right to lie here, like a beast of all sorts, go away, come on, go away from here, go away, go away from here, who am i telling you, well, but i don't know what to do with you, and look at you. listen, i

'm telling you for the last time, leave the dog alone, let's go, parasite, next, dubinina, so, dubinina, hold on, next, comrades, good morning, i have great news, so don't stop, today we all will come. to lie down to sleep later, because as a patron's help a soloist of the moscow theater is coming to us with a concert, where they are afraid of things, yes i know where they are going, someone does not want to go to the concert of dmitry javier, who dmitry javier.

after the germans you, they will let us in to alexander vladimirovich, well at least we can visit him, visit, visit, what did i think, well you guys are talented, not stupid, you should understand that nothing shines for you with the rook, and in september we are going on a tour of countries, you will win first, and then you will say, ulemenny. thank you, gennan antonovich, you understand that the rook is not bad, they deceived us, you will be able to quickly find igrachev, they will perform our favorite song "solnechny krug", sonne hält

unsere welt, der blindet golden strahlen, schnell bring us a paper, spaß machen immer leben die.

dad, hi, and i wanted to surprise you, well happy birthday, a gift in the car, great, dad, here's the thing, listen, my son is here, you listen to me. "i flew in especially for you, in a month we should be in london, i already bought the tickets, so what's wrong with you, pack your things and head to the airport, the limousine is purring at the entrance, and what about mom, mom, mom, she's waiting in moscow, on her suitcases, she's packed a ton of things, i say, well , why so much, you can buy everything there, no, she says, no, dad, listen, there's a thing, you have to help us"? what, excuse me, but grachev didn't come out? grachev? grachev! you

've been running around here all day today, back and forth, back and forth, you can't remember everyone. well, what? we sang about boys and girls, but no, no, why not, we won't drink anything without you, they banned the chase, heard, and what else do we have? we sing nothing, and now a new song will be performed by the moscow children's choir: how many of us are there? solovyov,

where? go to the toilet! what's going on with you? now, now everything will be.

our land, our land is singing. on air is a special analytical edition of the big game. today we will talk with dmitry vitalyevich trenin, a research professor at the higher school of economics. and dmitry vitalyevich is the ideal person for our topic today, nuclear deterrence,

and what are the consequences of this deterrence for russian foreign policy, but also for russian relations with the united states. newspapers, knows understands how the american deep state works remarkably well. but before we talk about the american deep state, let's listen to what president putin said yesterday about the need for a certain revision - of the doctrine of nuclear deterrence. we see that the modern military-political situation is changing dynamically, and we must take this into account. over the past year, specialists from the ministry of defense, the ministry of foreign affairs, the security council office

and other departments conducted a deep comprehensive analysis, assessed the need to adjust our approaches to the possible use of nuclear forces, in the updated version of the document, aggression against russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is proposed to be considered as their joint attack on the russian federation. the conditions for russia's transition to the use of nuclear weapons are also clearly recorded. we will consider this possibility already at receiving reliable information about a massive launch of air and space attack weapons and their crossing of our state border. meaning aircraft-strategic or tactical aviation, cruise missiles.

for quite some time now, that is, the war that is going on in ukraine, has forced us to reconsider our approach to strategic deterrence, since this deterrence has failed to prevent what is unfolding before our eyes, a de facto proxy war of the united states, where ukraine is as.

set a fairly high threshold for such use, namely a threat to the very

existence of the state, if we are talking about a non-nuclear conflict, this threshold, unfortunately, created the illusion among our opponents that it is possible to strike below this threshold, and hence the so-called, well, what journalists call the concept of a thousand strikes. thousands of cuts instead of one massive nuclear strike, as it was during the cold war, the plans were, a thousand cuts that would make russia bleed to death, that's it in order to prevent the implementation of such plans, it was necessary to adjust the nuclear doctrine of the russian federation. and how was it adjusted? from what the president said, we can only rely on the president's speech, i think that the text

of the main provisions of the state policy in the area of ​​nuclear deterrence will be published, as was the case with the previous one, with the doctrine that is now being adjusted, it was published in 2020, and probably the current version will be published at some point, within some time frame. here are three things: the first is what we have just heard, this is actually a statement that russia will be ready to use.

weapons, this is the first, in my opinion, was there still said in large quantities? yes, here, of course, we are not talking about isolated, launches, say, of uavs, drones, we are not talking about isolated crossings of the state border, by tactical aircraft, the president will decide, in fact, any doctrine gives the supreme president.

said that if ukraine receives the means with which it can carry out strikes long-range weapons, then this will mean that those countries that present such means will be in a state of war with us, now the president said that if some country - supported by a nuclear power - wages an aggressive war against russia, then we will consider this as a joint aggression of these countries against us. in other words, we will consider american aid to ukraine, aid in quotation marks, in fact it is not aid, but the provision of a means to the ukrainians

that will, well, in fact, be controlled americans, or or or westerners will consider the united states as a state that is at war with us, this is the second point. the third point, well, it was read from doctrinal documents before, but now it is stated officially enshrined in the new text of the doctrine, this is that an attack on belarus will mean an attack on russia, in this case, we are also considering the possibility of launching a nuclear strike on the aggressor, and the most recent thing is that from the president's speech we learned that a special meeting, a permanent meeting on issues of strategic stability has been in effect in russia for some time now and will obviously continue to be in effect, which

means that the innovations we have heard about may in the future...

from the point of view of analysts, it seems to me that it is obvious that the way the question was posed by the president. and your, from my point of view, very reasonable interpretation of what the president said, is the ability of strategic stability, because it warns the enemy what

not to do, but this is for analysts, here we are last time we talked, and the day after that i met several people at dinner, one of them a very patriotic person. what would you answer such a person? well, i would answer that the paradox of nuclear weapons is that their colossal ability to destroy, well, within the limits

of humanity, has until now been the only guarantee of humanity's survival, deterrence is strengthening deterrence, strengthening deterrence, than...

i will also return to you the american term, that, what is called hubris, that is, when you consider yourself omnipotent, all-powerful, when you do not pay attention to what can hinder your plans, you consider yourself capable of imposing your will on anyone at any time, this is this position, this situation, this policy,

is engaged in containment, containment is obliged to send a reliable signal that exceeding a certain threshold, in this

case, involvement. states of america and for their allies. this is what we are talking about. i think that after all, i hope, i do not know, i think about whether this is possible or not, that is, whether i think it is possible or not, but i hope that in the united states there will still be sober heads who will come.

that to express something like this now, especially china in the past, so i would like to say, when the whole world gathered in new york, including to talk about the need for greater disarmament and non-proliferation, i think that this will have a very bad effect on the situation in the whole world, that's it, that is, we did not expect anything else from blinken himself. we did not expect anything good from blinken, but there are many reasonable people who say something like this, not in such a primitive form, but say: uh, i remember well my conversation - with admiral malone, the former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, it was several years ago, when he was already naturally retired, and he uh joined

the board of directors, the center for national interests, where i worked at the time, so he called me and said, dmitry, i want to draw your attention to the fact that the article that you published in your magazine with graham allison, a well-known a harvard professor and also a former deputy minister of defense, that here is your article, he says, you can agree with it, disagree, the cover has an image of a nuclear explosion, this is completely unacceptable, well, i told him that firstly, in general, it is the editor-in-chief who determines what is on the cover, although i was slightly talking about the nuclear danger here, but they put it on i was being disingenuous, because i was the publisher of the magazine, let's say, i had a certain influence, but then i said, and don't you agree that

there is a nuclear danger? and that we need to talk about this to say that this nuclear danger would never be realized, and he answered me that from his point of view, the real nuclear danger is minimal. because russia is led by reasonable people, they will never resort to using nuclear weapons, unless foreign armies are rushing towards the kremlin, and that will not happen, and rastakh raising the issue of the nuclear danger will only stir up people, when they will be worried about the prospects of a nuclear war, they will start asking their government, why are you doing this, and can we?

the united states and the west in relation to ukraine, including the use.

officer's date, well, of course, of course, no, i mean the west, with the ukrainians it is a separate issue, of course, civilians continue to die, who are victims, including strikes with western weapons, of course, some volunteers from western countries and some advisers, some intelligence officers died, probably, but until the west is faced with real victims of the war, the moment may come when in order to prevent war, it will be necessary to inflict a strike, the victims of which will be some

pilots in some planes, some sailors on some ships, and maybe these strikes will not be carried out by the russian side, maybe these strikes will be carried out... we read various reports that these could be rumors, these could be fabrications, they could be true, according to which russian weapons are either being transferred, or could be transferred, to some forces in the middle east, which the united states are considering, which... are under attack from the united states and britain, which are considering these countries in as their enemies, as their opponents, when in the red sea or somewhere else or at some desert base, somewhere in syria a large

number of soldiers or sailors of western countries die, then it may be a different story, well, in general in the world there are many not only states, but also... used force in many areas and often such very primitive, brute force, in libya there is still a civil war, where one of the parties blames the united states for the fact that their country was actually destroyed, their leaders. gaddafi killed, this is just one example of some armed organizations that are laying claim to power, and which has its own serious scores to settle with the united states, but it seems to me, at least i would like to hope that

before we have such situations, we have a range of means to try to demonstrate to washington, american allies, that... this time russia is very, very serious, in addition to the doctrine, of course, there are very visible and large-scale exercises. naval fleet, and jointly with china, and in the open ocean, there is a significant increase in the number of russian armed forces, there is the potential for mobilization, which russia is not yet going for, and i am glad that i do not see the need for this, because without mobilization things are going well, but... it is clear that if we were talking about the possibility

of using nuclear weapons, then there are many other things that send an unmistakable signal about russian seriousness, i hope that all of this also contributed to deterrence, i think that this contributes to deterrence, but you will agree that those things, which you listed, they - in general, happened before the american administration seriously changed its approach, you are absolutely right, then, but there were no changes in the nuclear doctrine, not yet, not yet, but we will see what the reaction will be, here is a case, or let's say, here is an opportunity to transfer long-range missiles into ukrainian hands, given that control over it...

and that strategy of using tactical nuclear weapons, which was popular at the beginning of the cold war in the fifties, when there were all sorts of ones johns and other old methods, old systems of using nuclear weapons, it doesn't work now, but nuclear weapons as a deterrent, even during... a war that is being waged, a means of preventing a major nuclear war, it

can become the last argument in favor of ending the war, it will be a very, very, very bad case, it will be a case that will lead to the death of people, to a situation that is completely unthinkable for a normal person today, but... the point is that we must prevent a general nuclear war, which is being pushed one way or another by this strategy of a thousand cuts, that is, we are talking specifically about how to prevent a large-scale nuclear war, of course, i will change the subject a little, thank you, some of russia's neighbors...

the last of them from the statement, let's say, finland, estonia, how can they make masses of bellicose statements, but in the baltic sea, an internal sea of ​​nato, and block russia's access, in general, when i look at the history of international relations, i see few examples when... tiny countries bordering a great power, so that they with such, i would even say pleasure they are attacking this great power, even when no one is touching them, there are probably historical reasons for this, there are probably even some mitigating circumstances, but nevertheless, this kind of behavior, it is unusual from my point of view, dangerous for the interests of russia, well, first of all, dangerous for

the existence of these countries, that's what i was hoping that you would say, but i think that the explanation for this is a very deep-seated inferiority complex, especially in the baltic countries, finland really disturbs me surprised, very surprised, poland to a lesser extent, but the inferiority complex is very deep, and the frustration is very strong, and i want to hold on to my boss by the coattails, to somehow do something nasty, i rarely use such words, but here this word is... quite appropriate, to somehow do something nasty to russia? well, of course, paying attention to such things is probably not worth it, this, i mean on the statements, too much honor, too much attention, in general from a tiny, and really in military terms, if they move from

the word, wait, here, here is what concerns blockades, a blockade is an act of war in accordance with international law, an act of war must be responded to accordingly...

for how america will react to this, it is important how we ourselves will feel about the situation, this act will be given, in my opinion, will definitely be, in any case, an appropriate response must be given, further, i think that just as the west paints different pictures of how bad it will be for us in this or that case, it would probably be appropriate for us to also have certain... pictures, quite adequate pictures of what could happen if, well, but in general, of course, nothing, except, well, i don’t know, except for the lack of respect for those ruling elites who

are at the top of power in these countries today, there’s nothing to say, i would say about the ruling elites that here, and this is very dangerous, in my opinion, this kind of, maybe it’s the ukrainian syndrome, maybe it’s somehow different, but the ruling elites.

the question is not whether we can deal with them, but how and in what way to do it, on the one hand, responsibly, without giving in to provocations, but on the other hand, with great firmness, and so that these little jackals do not constantly cause damage, and the image of russia, well, and even serious russian interests, we go to advertising, we will return in literally a few minutes, and dmitry vitalyevich, as always, thank you very much for an interesting important conversation. thank you, dmitry,

thank you. global web of lies. in march, i received a letter with an invitation to take part in a project, which stated that the project was financed by the us state department. as the us recruits european bloggers for an information war against russia? for 10 years they have been fed, created an illusion of independence, and now the mousetrap is starting to slam shut, dianonon pseudo, historian and diplomat, who invented the myth of vladimir monomakh, oxform - this is just nonsense, did he know about it to go there, this desire of a small country to privatize the entire heritage of the great slavic ethnic group - this is stupidity, antifake, today on the first.

base of the entire planet grows by thousands of years, we we see the benefits of spent fuel, we see the materials that we can reuse, we know how to extract them, i can say, extract deuterium from water in any place where there is water. we are in one of two laser halls, the largest in russia, a new generation laser facility. nuclear energy is not just green at the moment, it is also the most sustainable and predictable. this is the green sustainable electricity on which the energy sovereignty of our homeland is based, on the day of the nuclear worker

industry, premieres on saturday on... there's a big game on the air, frankly, from the american election campaign, you won't get bored, either they kick president biden out of the election race, or they don't actually allow any discussions to take place in...

the place where there's a desperate fight between two candidates for the presidency, a fight for the electoral votes of this state, which can decide the outcome of the presidential race, and he went accompanied by a number of democratic politicians, and clearly showed that he prefers kamala harris, donald

trump, i have to tell you that i... the attacks on me, your beloved president, we continue to give billions of dollars to a man who refuses to make a deal, zelensky, any deal he would make would be better than what we have now, this country is destroyed right now, it can't be rebuilt, it will take hundreds of years, all the money in the world can't do it. biden and kamalo allowed this to happen, they pumped money and weapons into zelensky like never before in history, but

now ukraine is running out of soldiers, so what and... have to use small children and old people, there is no ukraine anymore, it will never be the same again, it is impossible to restore destroyed cities and towns, it is impossible to bring back the dead people, of which there are so many, any deal, even a bad one, would be better than what we have now, they would have conceded a little in something, everyone would live, every building would be intact and every tower would stand for another 200 years, well... trump spoke emotionally, i think, however, that in essence he was right, and of course, after such a statements about the role of ukraine in american domestic policy, will be seriously spoken and thought about. on the one hand, trump is taking a big risk, because

according to various estimates, there really are about 400-500 thousand citizens of ukrainian origin living in pennsylvania, and if we add to this number voters of polish origin and people from other central european countries, then some say that there may even be 900 thousand people, which is more than enough to determine the outcome of the election

for trump, that is, the situation is very acute very unpredictable, which helps trump, that he is far from alone in this matter, are outraged in general.

well, in general, it has a favorable attitude towards ukraine, but this is until the moment when the ukrainians do not try to defeat the republican party, and i think that we will see the consolidation of republicans in congress around the anti-ukrainian position, and i think this will increase the personal rejection of president zelensky by republicans, and not only republicans. i do not know what president zelensky was thinking when he provoked this kind of escalation. in general, we already know that he and his advisers are very impudent people, with a great sense

of permissiveness, if you remember how their officials insulted the german chancellor scholz, and then absolutely expected that scholz would give them -

they see danger only on one side and do not notice the insidious influences on the other. true patriots who can resist the intrigues of the favorite, become suspicious and hateful, while the victims of deception

are awarded applause and the trust of the people, betraying its interests. well, it seems to me better and you can't say it more clearly, and indeed, right now in the united states there is a witch hunt, there is an accusation.

states, freedom, respect for the law, and most importantly the understanding that america should have its own path, which should be determined by american interests, and not by some kind of pressure from outside, as in this case from the outside. in memory of roman madyanov. here is the stage. hello, girl. hello, my dear. romka, he is a universal artist, for me, in any case, he is the rank of, well, leonov. i am not a disciplined artist, i learn the text in make-up time. i look at him when he's on the set, it's old school, he puts down the takes exactly. for me. he's such a dear

, damn talented, robber prince, he has a precision penetration into what he does, such precision, an absolutely unpredictable person, what he 'll do now is absolutely unknown, there have been a lot of great cases in my life, i waited for them, and i didn't miss them, i just did my job and did my job. in the new season on the first, there are already rumors about it in the city crime, wherever you go, they say everywhere, women are lured into taxis and shot in the back, i wanted to ask you about your find, this knot seemed very massive, although it was easy enough to pick up, you have been awarded the great honor of moles. the honor and trust of reich.

remember this. after the war, i was looking for my son's colleague. i was interested in what was happening there at the end of the war. and anything could have happened there . you don't have any photos of kolya? strange. where are they? were they here? lord, how you look like my son. you are the only real one witness. the only person he came to openly. well? major, the hunt has begun, the confrontation, the premiere of the legendary book by julian semeny. there's a big game on the air, now we're moving to bierut, where channel one correspondent pavel krasnov is on the line with us. thank you very much

for finding the time, and tell us, to begin with, where you are and what 's going on there, well, actually we are in the capital of lebanon, but the thing is that just recently, a few hours ago, it got so dark here, everything was also the fourth in a row on the okralitsa, so what they say is that there is hispola, but besides that, of course, there are primarily residential buildings there, which were the targets of the strike, yes, israeli representatives say that the target of this strike was one of the leaders of hispola, namely the commander of the air unit, which is often responsible for flood control, perhaps he was really killed as a result of this strike, but besides him, of course, ordinary citizens also became victims of the strike, as usually happens in such... in cases of such

indiscriminate strikes by israel, which we have seen and i see now in lebanon, but only what is happening in the capital itself in its environs, if we are already talking about the situation in lebanon as a whole, then it means that in the screw of local authorities almost every minute there are reports of new airstrikes, just in one hour, imagine, in the list of populated areas on the rare pardirovka 16 trees during the day. such reports come constantly, as well as reports of dead and wounded civilians, let me read one of such meetings directly for clarity, today's events in the su area, this is the south of lebanon, the border with israel, that is, the territory that is subjected to the most intense shelling, so strikes, kana, one dead, three wounded, qabnus, three dead and wounded, five wounded, four wounded in the city of suri itself, here are a number of populated areas. and there are also

victims of airstrikes, this is only one of the areas of lebanon, that is, we can say that the intensity of israeli attacks is not decreasing at all, on the contrary, and their geography is expanding, but many strikes were made in the peak area, this is the northern part of lebanon, the borders of syria and this is then, that during the night about 150 strikes were already carried out on this same territory, these strikes continued in it, you see what this will be useful for, when people stood in fences for many hours on the road from the southern regions of lebanon to bera, so now the same traffic jams are appearing on the border of syria, that is, people from lebanon to syria, that is, for many years, you know, there was - we do not observe a flow of migrants from syria, after the war began in syria,

now this flow has turned around, that is, and you we are sure that it is safer in syria now than in nevan, but as for the refugees, we have been to one of the points. we took them with us, but as a rule, people fled in what they were wearing, they did not take anything with them, just in the hope of being saved, to save themselves and their families, but people say that they still feel safer here

than at home, here one of the refugees told us that he simply does not know whether you will see your home when he returns, because it is quite possible that his house has already been razed to the ground. one of the airstrikes, people who are in these accommodation points, they say that they are very tired, they fear for their lives, they fear for their children, so they leave everything in the hope of finding safety. moreover, many of these shelters are already overcrowded. you saw how one group, probably a refugee family , arrived during the reimbursement, asked if there were places there, there were no places, they moved on. to the next point - in total, about 360 of these are open in the capital of lebanon, but as you can see, periodically in some of them there are not enough places, moreover, some hotels are running out of room, after all, among those who are trying to get away

from the shelling, there are people who can afford to rent a hotel room, but there are not always rooms in hotels, but well, there are... if the blows become even stronger, the flow of inter-nationalists will undoubtedly increase and it is unknown whether the local authorities , the revan authorities will be able to cope with this, but this is not to mention the probable ground operation, which is of course being discussed, if it begins, it will become even more difficult, you have already heard quite a lot of statements about preparations for an invasion, that a full-scale war could begin, but for now this is of course just talk, while everyone is discussing the next airstrikes, i repeat, it does not stop, the message about new strikes does not come to kedvali every minute. thank you, and if there are any signs that hezbollah is ready, but if not to capitulate, then at least it is very significant,