our hands gra, our hands gra, the soul of the servant of god, hallelujah, hallelujah, glory to you, god! there's a big game on the air. today is a joyful event in russia. reunification day, which is widely celebrated in moscow and many other places. anatoly gennadyevich oksakov, you are the chairman of the duma committee on financial markets, and you know well. ukraine

and naturally we were quite calm about it, because we lived in fraternal ukraine, with fraternal people, after finishing school i even entered kiev university, though i dropped out. i went to work at the factory, but there in kiev and communicated a lot with ukrainians, our brothers, friends, i still talk to them on the phone, by the way, so for me it is a big event the return of four subjects of the federation, but i am sure that kiev will also return home to its brothers and the people who live in ukraine, they will really understand, and many understand that... that

their brothers, their relatives live in russia, we need to be together in order to build a happy future life together, so besides the fact that we are happy about this event, do i understand correctly that the fact that we we celebrate it quite solemnly, it means the iron determination of the president and the commander-in-chief not to give up these territories. in order to develop, to create conditions that would allow people living in these subjects of the federation to feel as comfortable as most of russia lives, therefore the decision is unambiguous, who will invest in subjects that they do not see in their composition, this means a waste of money.

everywhere he propagated his peace plan, which at the same time he called a plan ukrainian victory, do you agree that it is not that this celebration is a conscious response to zelensky, but it is a powerful demonstration that from russia's point of view, his plan for victory is a complete fiction, well, i think that the west, despite... disputes,

i think that the west still has not understood how determined we are, that is , it is not even that we, of course, will not stop military action until we liberate novorossiya, but some kind of return of some territory is out of the question, this is generally beyond the limit, and how much we could to invest there or not to invest, but knowing our people and our president putin, i think that there is no, not a single chance, zero chance. zero probability that we can give up something from these our united lands, but we have not completed the liberation, that is, we liberated part of novorossiya, four subjects, this is even maybe a little less than half of novorossiya, novorossiya includes odessa region, kharkov region, nikolaev region and dnepropetrovsk, these

are actually four subjects, we are celebrating their entry, and four subjects are still it remains to liberate, and this is the minimum. after which russia can go to peace negotiations, and if we were dealing with realists in the person of the ukrainians or the west, then i think that we would approach the problems of settling relations with russia in approximately the same way, at a minimum novorossiya must be liberated, we celebrate four subjects, we mourn four subjects, we have the fact of the enemy's invasion of kursk territory, and how... can we talk about a victory at all for ukraine or the west over us, russia is only just entering into a serious understanding of that historical task, which is novorossiya, and this is really our destiny, this is our holiday, this is our pain, this is in fact, this restoration of russia as

a great power depends on who controls novorossiya, by the way , our enemies understood this perfectly well, in zhizinsk, for example, he said that russia without ukraine is a regional state of russia with ukraine, and not necessarily through conquest, through liberation, as now just an alliance, for example, if there were another, there was another leadership of this brotherly people of ours, but ukraine together with russia constitutes a truly independent polis, if russia is deprived of ukraine, this fundamentally lowers our status qualitatively, deprives us of the status of a great power, we are fighting for a return to history, therefore novorussiya will be. you know, i generally really like the idea that russia should be a great power, but i don’t know if you will agree that this is not only a question of status, it is a question of survival, because a great power

that cannot position itself as a great power, it demonstrates. the so-called abnormal country, which has embarked on the path of self-reduction, collapse and disintegration, and where the disintegration begins, it is difficult to say at what level it will stop, especially with some specific russian idea, as compensation for what, for example, happened after the collapse of the ottoman empire,

the national idea of ​​ataturk took the place of the empire, and after the collapse of the ussr, the empire, no, no compensation, no national idea, even for this partial remainder in the form of the russian... federation, followed, therefore russia could, as a normal country, it had only one way out - to disintegrate further, so when putin came to power, he changed this fundamental trend, he said: "no, russia is a great power, an abnormal point, more than normal, great, this will alone, this designated vector for returning to history, changed the course, in essence, of everything, and of course." in practice now there is this stumbling block, this is the territory where everything is decided, this is the territory of novorossiya, here russia plus novorossiya is a great power, this is a great independent independent power on a global scale,

and if we do not hold on now, do not pay for this declaration, this fundamental geopolitical statement that we made by starting the svo, then this will not be... i think that this will definitely be considered an attack on the russian federation, and no option

is excluded there. we have a much wider range of nuclear weapons than any other nuclear power. the targets of such strikes could be command posts, points command, communications, deep nuclear weapons basing sites, airfields, naval basing points, that is, all significant military targets that are capable of undermining or completely disabling the enemy's offensive potential. this is what you... describes all aspects of our, let's say, power

, both military, economic, political, and so on, and there is a document called the principles of the russian federation's policy in the area of ​​nuclear deterrence, this is what is called our nuclear doctrine or nuclear strategy, you understand, many they say that it appeared - in the twentieth year, i'm not sure about this, because we simply had such documents in the soviet union in the russian federation, it was not customary to make them public, i just don't know about this, but the fact that in the twentieth year the presidential decree first appeared, this document appeared, in which cases or conditions for the use of russia and nuclear... all this happened against the background of - so to speak

, the coup d'etat in ukraine, it was clear that our so to speak relations with ukraine were going downhill, so it was an obvious decision was made by the president that it was necessary to expand, the military doctrine provided for two cases of application. russia nuclear weapons, this is an attack on the russian federation and its allies using weapons of mass destruction, nuclear chemical, bacteriological, the second case of an attack on the russian federation without allies, using conventional weapons, when the very existence of the russian state is threatened. in the document of the twentieth year, two additional cases have already appeared, this confirmed.

it was clear that a coup d'etat had taken place, that no one was going to implement the minsk agreements, that is , the situation, so to speak, is heating up, now against the backdrop of, so to speak, this ladder, the escalation that we have repeatedly spoken about, the west is becoming more and more involved in this conflict, there are already lively discussions going on, well, from my point of view they, so to speak, have more to do with some kind of political games than with reality, i

mean permission to strike deep russian territory, you see, i think there is no permission here, all permissions have already been given, all decisions have been made, another thing is that there are few missiles, long-range missiles that the west can transfer to ukraine, there are few of them, a massive strike is not possible, and there are salvos consisting of - 10 or 12 missiles, as was the case recently with the attack on the crimean bridge, they are all intercepted with almost 100% probability, so in these conditions the president...

naturally the general staff of the ministry of defense is developing recommendations, maybe

this will be brought up at the security council, but in any case the decision is made by the president. the next very important point, which was, so to speak, voiced by the president, is everything that concerns belarus, if in the document of the twentieth year it was simply allies, implying that this is a country participating in the collective security treaty, then here we are talking specifically about belarus, as a participant in the union state.

behind which stands not just the nuclear power the united states, but several leading nuclear powers, which is not ukraine, not these nuclear powers. cannot count on impunity, for me it is not so much lowering the nuclear threshold, for me it is mainly strengthening the reliability

of nuclear deterrence, and you know better than me, because you have been negotiating on this issue for many years and are an outstanding specialist on this issue , it is obvious to me that if you want to avoid war, then strengthening the quality. nuclear deterrence, this is generally a constructive step towards maintaining peace, well, and now we will talk about a place where, unfortunately, peace is in no way is not supported, i'm talking about lebanon, a terrible tragedy is happening there, when you look at these shots, when the heaviest bombs are used. deliberately, i emphasize, deliberately, in front of apartment buildings, whatever the explanation for this, it

cannot be a good explanation for me, karin kneissl is with us on skype now, karin, now the head of the geopolitical observatory on key issues of russia at st. petersburg university, she is a former minister of foreign affairs of austria, we will talk about austria. this is since 1900 78, in the seventies it was about destruction about destruction, but

it led to more poverty in 2024, everything is about eliminating hezbollah, and what we have seen in recent weeks, in fact, many taboos that were precisely broken, such as the complete elimination of the leadership and ahizbollah. hezbollah has been hiding for 20 years, but perhaps i could say that they could have killed nashaw in the last 20-30 years, but in fact nothing happened, now the question is why did this happen now, the question is what the final war of the war, what is the final, the reason for the war, thousands of people were evacuated from lebanon.

he personally gave the order to eliminate the leader of hezbollah, because he thought it was necessary for the security of israel, and so that the people of northern israel could return to their homes, which are now these areas are being shelled by hezbollah, why did netanyahu get it wrong from your point of view? not only that netanyahu got it wrong, it was also his predecessors. in may 2024 , prime minister khuzbarak, he decided to leave

southern lebanon, because it was said that it an area where there is no security, namely the intrusion, modern attacks and killings have appeared, of course, the leadership of hezbollah has now been destroyed. this is a fact, but there are still thousands, thousands of people who are ready to fight in the country of hezbollah, they exist, and, for example, we will also add forces from ivan, i am not really sure how iran will react and whether it will react at all, this is a big big question, but inside lebanon now.

1972 in the spring of 2000 2020, but in fact the number of killed soldiers was very high, i could even say, let them come back, but i am convinced that the insurgency, terrorism, whatever you call it, will emerge very soon, because there are thousands of hezbollah fighters in lebanon, there is a vacuum there, and this vacuum has always attracted military personnel, freelance fighters, as they say, whoever it is, whoever pays, whose ideology is more attractive, they will come, and i do not

see the armed forces. and as for a ground operation to hold territory, for security purposes, yes, this has existed in the last few decades, but it didn't work, my advice, if i may say so, it, of course, no one asked for it,

about the peaceful quarters of beirut, i have to say something new, well, let's move on to another topic, which you also know very well, and this is of course the topic of austria, where important elections have just taken place, so i think that the right-wing party won, they are trying to present it as extremist, i'm not sure that it is so radical,

but... which supported the victory, should not represent the chancellor or put forward government, but the problem for them is that they will not be able to find a basis for a coalition, all the other parties refuse to join the coalition, the coalition structure, number two and number three are the conservative parties and also

the democrats. which does not have a strong enough legislative power, has the right to nominate a person to form a government, traditionally it has been the case that it has been the head of the party that has won an absolute majority, but what we saw 20 years ago, around 2000 there was a similar situation, not number one. was appointed to form a government, all this for those who do not see the situation from the inside, for russians who do not really understand all the twists and turns, this is connected with certain principles, party

number one must perform the following function: to create a government, as i see it, we will see. a government of social democrats, a very fragile government, those who could not win, or we will enter a dead end, and this is a very dangerous outcome, because the country is now experiencing great economic, social difficulties, we don't have time, we can't waste it , i think we'll see more difficulties difficulties ahead. what 's going on? in france, marie le pen's party gets more votes than anyone else in the last parliamentary elections. a similar situation has developed with the right-wing party in

holland. in germany, in the local elections, the right-wing party alternative for germany, also wins victory after victory. that they can't do it, because each time they are not only not allowed to come to power, but they are completely excluded from the decision-making process decisions. i don't know if this is coordinated in different countries by the ruling elites, or if they simply have this tendency, but one can say that right-wing parties are deliberately not allowed to participate equally in european politics.

many who were members of this government have had difficult times since, that is, these campaigns against individuals, they exist, it is true, i have just seen in german newspapers that they are trying to remove a certain party from the possible legislative base, if this is really done. certainly, this will provoke colossal consequences, but the situation is very fragile, unstable in all the countries you mentioned, since the rules of the game are not the same for everyone,

remember george orwell, his famous work. i liked it and i wanted to live this whole story together with the hero i see on the screen. the average eagle looks at all this with

incomprehension, what are they clapping for, why does it sound so terrible. then our soloist comes out, who, with the breaking voice of a peacock, begins to sing our beautiful works. probably, the most pleasant memories are when we went to orlyonok for a whole month and we all. why didn't you grow up as a little slacker, lived in these buildings where children live, like all normal children, i'm trying now, i 'm making up for it, and oleg's wonderful mother comes up and says: what a lazy boy we have? he's not afraid of anything, he's such a brave boy, but alyona, more than anything in the world, he's afraid of pigeons. is there competition in the hand for solo parts? of course, there is always competition, because everyone wants to solo. well, that's what age, that's what the whole series is about. beautiful, i'm starting.

on saturday on channel one. the big game is on air. we

just talked about how things are with democracy in europe. and how they stop parties that get the most votes when these parties are considered undesirable. let's look at the united states. things are a little worse for trump when

you look at the key states where there could really be one or the other outcome, for which there is a desperate fight. now if you look at the situation in these states, you you'll see that trump doesn't have an edge in any of these key states right now. it's a very small margin, but in almost all cases. it's a tiny margin for his republican, excuse me, his democratic opponent, except for north carolina, where it's 48-48 so far, and you know, trump has had two assassination attempts, maybe, to be precise, let's say one assassination attempt and one attempted assassination, trump still speaks to large crowds. the last time he spoke to an audience of 100,000 people,

many journalists are already starting to say that this could be the courage of despair, that he does not believe in the possibility of his electoral victory, therefore he is consciously taking a big risk in order to give the company a new dynamic. what do you think, aleksanich, maybe he is exaggerating the danger to himself? well, i think that the danger is there, and two assassination attempts or an assassination attempt, an assassination attempt, testifies to the fact that those forces, those same forces, are the same forces on a global scale that exclude conservatives from political reality both in europe and in america, they decided to kill him. i think that if trump's situation was really something like a lag, then... the attempts at this murder, nor

zelensky's meeting, by the way, with him, who basically up until the last moment, almost as a peacemaker, kept trump, suddenly he comes to america, despite the final embrace with the democrats, he meets with trump, all these are signs that, by and large, trump is more dangerous and more serious and is in a more advantageous position than it is described, by the way, i as doctor of sociology i can say that social... questions are a very tricky thing, even if you ask a direct question, people often do not answer what they think, or the question is formulated incorrectly, or ambiguously, or the calculation. these data are in someone's hands, it is very easy to transform, and if there is a press, and if there are their own poster companies that are biased towards one of the parties, then of course, especially when it comes to a more or less equal attitude in society, it is very easy to change these percentages in one direction or another

change sides, this is by and large sociology is not an exact science, sociology is a study of society, it is a humanitarian discipline, some philosophies, therefore here these surveys, they, they should be trusted with a certain degree of approximation, but i think that trump's situation is very, very good, moreover, i think that in essence in american society he is leading, but since most of the press is in the hands of the democrats, most of the sociological services are in the hands of the democrats, the deep state, the deep state, in general, to a greater extent leans towards the democrats, i think that... there will be no elections, and if trump is still an honest fair sports game in these no democratic competition, some strengthen his position and those who need to see it through the noise and chaff of media companies that only show a smiling kamala

harris, if they see that trump is really leading, and this is very likely, then i do not exclude, even more likely, that there will be some other attempt. to eliminate, because there are other ways to stop him no, well, it seems to me that this election campaign is a very unattractive spectacle and especially the behavior of the administration, the biden administration harris, as you rightly said, the liberal media, well, probably the law enforcement agencies, which instead of protecting the law have become... a weapon, and literally in the hands of the state, but for our viewers gennadyevich, the question inevitably arises, but we have been told more than once that democracy in america is far from perfect, it's like it's not news, when you look at what's

happening now with this election campaign, what's your opinion, is this something qualitative? studying at the crimean school and studying of course at moscow university, then working in cheboksary, i watched what was happening in the united states of america, and well, i chose some candidate for whom i was rooting. of course, already as a young man, i was struck by the election system, when it's

not the people who vote, but the electors, and these electors are determined, in my opinion, completely unfair... way, as a result, even if the majority of voters are, for example, for trump, if you conduct a poll there or a direct vote, he will not necessarily become president, and the electors will determine, depending on the american system, who should become him, and this, of course, in my opinion, says that the american election system definitely needs to be changed, so that it is fairer, the second, as if... there was no in the past years, when i observed america, i was still bribed by this, at least at least, the semblance of democracy, when it was possible to say what you want and call for voting for whoever you want, now i see what sanctions are applied to those who, well,

say a different point of view, what pressure is put on these people, yes, you are a striking example, to be honest, i did not expect that...

i did not know that to such an extent, well, you know, when we got together and discussed what was happening with election campaigns, and i

knew many journalists, we did not have the topic of the deep state in the sense that the deep state can allow, not allow someone to run, especially stop someone, and, well, let's say, in the most drastic ways, what do you think?

i'm looking at recent events, even the richest person, well, like zuckerberg, elon musk, can be subjected to, so to speak, the most severe persecution, and i do not exclude, yes, whoever they put in jail there... uh, the largest, the largest investor, but - a member of my board of directors of the center

where i worked for national interests, lord conrod black, a billionaire with a media empire, it is also called, stroked someone - in the wrong direction, they entered into a very good relationship with him, first they froze all his assets, because they froze his assets, he could not pay for lawyers, for the examination. yes, so they soldered him so that it will not seem a little, but then he had some assets abroad, he managed to bring them, the supreme court went, he was acquitted on almost all counts, with the exception of some minor financial violations, and immediately released from prison, one problem, his company was already destroyed, well, yes, his reputation was already destroyed, but otherwise everything is fine.

as far as i understood, he didn't have people, he changed national security advisers, he changed ministers, he changed everyone there five or six times, that is, he didn't have a team, attempts to change part of the bureaucracy in key positions also ended in failure, i don't know how it will be now if he wins, because i agree with aleksandromelievich that... despite the fact that we are now assessing there, to be sick or not to be sick, as they say, both are worse, we we are looking at both candidates through the prism of

the ukrainian crisis. uh, both trump and harris, i don't even know which of them is more dangerous for us, because trump - with his, so to speak, uh, such an economic approach, that i will make a deal with putin, i will offer him, you know, in the spirit of don corleone, i will make him an offer that he will not be able to refuse, i think for us this will not be a very, so to speak, option, because if we remember the first, the first...

also china, there are also other countries that are developing rapidly and will create problems, and if america, and this must be taken into account, if america, well, for example, leads to russia becoming some kind of insignificant state, then this territory will be, well, to a significant extent, at least, for this there is a prospect of being controlled by another powerful state, which will create more serious competition for america. therefore, trump, from my point of view, must proceed, firstly, from the depth of the interests of his people, and they presuppose their well-being, their peace, the solution of many, many majority internal problems, external, they should be taken into account in such a way that there is a balance of interests, and russia, in this case, is the interest of the united states, which supports

a certain geopolitical stability in asia. in europe, in this regard, in my opinion, for some reason i believe in this regard that trump thinks exactly like this. thank you, we're going to commercial, we'll be back in literally a few minutes, this meme about vladimir zelensky was posted by elon musk, it says when 5 minutes have already passed, and you haven't asked for a billion dollars in aid yet, so this is a fake for what? ukrainian television branded elon musk, it hit very hard on the image component of the leader of the kiev junta. why did the west suddenly start calling ugledar completely unimportant, after 2 years of fighting for this city. as the wolf said in the famous soviet cartoon, there was artemovsky and avdiivka again. they just have a premonition that soon everything will be final. antifake. today on the first. this is not

a lie, not a tale, others saw it, i saw how they tried to manually turn a stupid tit into a crane, so that it would not see the blue distance and not to break away from the ground, roughly ringed the crane, put a mark in the journal, hid it in the closet, tied the wings. white bird of my happiness, so that it would breathe warm dust and not plot anything, but it was

not for nothing that the bird grew stronger in the sky, fools remained fools, a broken cage, a pile of ashes, and the crane is back in the clouds, for teacher's day, we'll live until monday, on sunday on the first, and do you know what he wrote in the essay, well now... no one will know, he wrote happiness, it's when you are understood. do you know that zelensky has just been in united states, he talked to trump, to harris, and naturally, to president biden, visited congress, visited a plant in pennsylvania where they produce ammunition, it just so happened that the plant is located in a state on which a lot depends in terms of elections, zelensky was accompanied exclusively by democrat politicians, he came with his famous peace plan, a victory plan and wanted to get permission, although maybe he didn’t really need it, to use american weapons to strike deep into russia,

from your point of view, we know what he came with, what he left with from your point of view, you know, it seems to me that when we analyze the personality of the president, former president zelensky, now his status is uncertain in politics, now we consider him a ringleader, lawless and illegitimate, the ringleader of an extremist terrorist junta, we, frankly speaking, apply to his actions the criterion of big, serious, a little old politics, and he represents a completely new phenomenon, this zelensky is a postmodern figure, he will never moves deep, he is not serious, he is a real clown, and postmodernism is always a simulacrum, it is always a clown show, with this, with this function of being a representative of some

game from the west in striving to maintain its hegemony over the world, he copes with this role brilliantly, he does not give a damn about ukraine, about victory in the war, he needs attention, he needs a certain... being in the center of public, public interest, and he is ready for this, for the sake of applause, like an actor, he is ready for everything, and he goes for it all, he is destroying, he destroyed his country, he is destroying his population, because it is not his population, he is not about this, but the role that he plays, somewhere helping the democrats, and harris, who are his main, main sponsors, he is precisely the protégé. of this deep american state in, by the way, excuse me, your concept, who is part of the deep state from your point of view, this is i this is a very big complex topic, maybe we will discuss it, and you say in two phrases, and then we will discuss it separately, here - it is necessary here

pay attention to where this term came from, it came from turkey, derin devlet is a representation of that kimali group that ruled the military-political group, by the way, it was a whole, well, if you like, military-political.