world order, in a response message, xiding ping already stated that china, together with russia, will contribute to maintaining peace and stability on the planet. well, russia is doing this, russia continues to win victories on the battlefield, new settlements are being liberated every day, just today minomoron reported the liberation of verkhnekamenskoye in the donetsk people's republic, well, in the very near future the long-awaited news about the liberation of ugledar should arrive. general staff. the armed forces of ukraine has already officially confirmed the withdrawal of its units from there from ugledar, and the british telegraph described how this withdrawal is happening very colorfully. let's listen. hundreds of ukrainian soldiers find themselves trapped in the disembarked city, as russian troops approach and complete its encirclement. in desperation, one ukrainian soldier said that the escape route from ugledar is cut off, and food, ammunition and fuel are running low, according to him, due to russian artillery shelling and work without...

volunteer corps of the ministry defense, who will tell us what is really happening in ugledar right now. pavel alekseevich, good afternoon, you have the floor. yes, good afternoon, dmitry vyacheslavovich, indeed now the operational command of the khortitsa group has confirmed the surrender of ugledar. right now, at the moment , the city is being cleared by... troops, right now, judging

by the geography of the flags placed at points in the city, we can say that our fighters control all of ugledar, now attempts by the remnants of the ukronazi group to leave, now it is practically impossible, because artillery is working on them, our uav operators, all the roads are completely controlled by our soldiers, so to say that now some kind of organized exit will be...

fish, in general, the situation at the ugledar garrison is quite critical, the city is completely controlled by our troops. thank you very much, pavel alekseevich, take care of yourself, well, and we are waiting for news that the city is not only controlled, but cleared, and accordingly, already completely liberated, i believe that this will happen in the very near future. well, here is the washington post today writes that in august september of this year , russian troops are advancing at a pace that... has not been seen since the twenty -second year, that is, since the very beginning of the special operation, and the washington post cites several reasons that, in its opinion, led to such an acceleration of russian offensive operations. the first is a change in russian tactics, that now assault operations are carried out by small groups that are less visible to drones, the second is the adventure of the ukrainian armed forces themselves in the kursk region, which pulled away from the donbass combat-ready. units of the ukrainian armed forces, well, actually,

the result is obvious. so, ugledar is already under our control, next, probably, pokrovsk. ivan pavlovich, what's next and how do you assess the situation on the fronts in general? well, those who will leave, they are leaving to the north, those who managed to leave ugledar, they are leaving to the north, now a serious battle is going on in tsukurino, and naturally, kurakhova, by the way, it was the center of attraction back then at the beginning of our special military operation, because kurakhova. this is a very serious logistics hub that affects in general on the whole situation, and in general, by the way, pay attention that here is the fall, that is, after ugledar the situation will develop as follows, our pokrovsk, our forces go to those cities, to those forts, so to speak, ukrainian, where the logistics chain was created, that is, the main one - the fortification lines were closer. serious fortifications,

the same kurakhovo, where the situation is clearly moving already, from the south this city is not protected, and there no one planned that it turns out with there will be a passage from the ugledar side, which means that, in general, this whole situation should probably be called the pokrovsk- ugledar envelopment, that is, with a large, that is , approach from one side, as was correctly noted, it seems to be acting in small groups, but in many... directions, and accordingly, having launched the battle in a huge number of places, they stretched out the ukrainian forces, because the ukrainians, they took ukrainsk, they took karlovka there, that means, and the tsukurino battle, the kurakhovo battle, pokrovsk, yes, they are already holding certain territories there with difficulty, that's it

they are stretched out, and of course, the second factor, the kurdish kurdish adventure, but you know, i would note it from the other side, in fact... this is what played most against zelensky and syrsky, who carried out this plan, that the majority of the military personnel, that is, the militants in the ssu, especially the officer corps, they saw, they saw that this was not universal stupidity, it was very dangerous, they, you see, shouted, beat the drum there, but no one listened to them, will not listen, they are nobodies for selensky, and thus, the situation worked against the general staff the ukrainian armed forces. the office of the president of ukraine, that the trust in the command has been finally lost, they will come up with some other adventure, now it will be interesting, but in general, will there be anyone willing to get involved in this adventure, well, and another failure of the kurdish adventure is connected with the fact that it did not allow to realize the main

political goal that stood behind it, to achieve nato's entry into a direct war against russia, to achieve direct strikes deep into russia with long-range weapons, while the administration. well, it is not possible to win, and accordingly it is necessary to change the goal-setting itself, and the freezing option is proposed, which naturally does not suit russia at all, well, and the tone of not only the publication, but the statements of key western politicians is changing, for

example, let's listen to what statement was recently made by the leader of the main opposition party germany, the opposition cdu christian democrats friedrich moers, because the ratings of chancellor scholz himself and the ruling traffic light coalition are tending to zero, they are simply catastrophic and according to the results of the upcoming elections to the bundestag moers will most likely become chancellor. so let's listen to what he said about the ukrainian conflict. ukraine will never be able to defeat russia, that was not the goal, but for me victory means the following: it must restore sovereignty on its territory, and russia must stop attacking this country. we must do everything so that russia considers the continuation of the war hopeless, but we are quite far from this, so we are quite far from this and in general ukraine cannot win, and chancellor scholz, yes, whose ratings are approaching zero, here apparently decided to talk to vladimir putin on the phone, yesterday

the german media actively wrote about this, including the newspaper zeit, but today putin's press secretary, dmitry peskov, quite rightly, i think, asked himself the question, what is there to talk about with him at all, relations have been destroyed to... zero, yes, scholz is one of the participants in the anti-russian coalition, what is there to talk about with them at all, yes, really, kiril lugenovich, what is he talking about with them anyway, why did scholz need to talk to putin at all and how do you assess this change in tone, well, why does scholz need to talk to putin, it’s clear, after the elections in austria, where, in fact, the bell is already very, very alarming, it’s clear that the austrian right-wing party will of course be pushed aside...

scholz is absolutely pointless, it seems to me, the subjectivity of scholz and germany in international relations today is not even equal to zero, but below zero. scholz cannot even control his own ruling coalition, because anna lena baerbock, the minister of foreign affairs, the head of the green party openly says that she does not agree with scholz's position on the supply of tauruses, which scholz forbids for now on long-range strikes against russia, she is for, yes, scholz is against, but really - it is pointless

to talk with the current european elites, yes, maybe if there is a rotation, then there will be something to talk about, for now it is pointless, well, and also we must understand that the maximum that the current european elites , gritting their teeth , would be ready to offer russia is a freeze, which does not solve tasks of our special operation. because it presupposes the preservation and strengthening of the kiev regime in the western orbit, its preservation and strengthening as an anti-russian proxy, and for russia this is absolutely unacceptable, therefore we will achieve the fulfillment of all the tasks set only by military means, and how we achieve this, we have already partially discussed in relation to the situation in ukledar, but now let's ask boris aleksandrovich rozhin about how the situation is developing on the fronts of the special operation as a whole by this hour until... good afternoon, boris alesanovich, good afternoon, yes, if we talk about the situation in fruta as a whole, then our troops

continued to conduct offensive operations in many directions, in the zaporizhzhya direction our troops continued to exert pressure north of rabotin and verbovoye, on the vremyevsk salient our troops continued attacks in the direction of zolotaya niva and makarovka, in the ugledar direction, in addition to the ongoing cleanup of ugledar itself and the evacuation of civilians who were found there, our troops continue to advance north of ugledar, as well. the key terekone has been taken, from which the area is visible, there we will see progress in the near future, there are also battles for

the northern part of the miner, we have progress in the area of ​​grodovka and novogrodovka in the direction of krasnoarmeysky mirnograd, here the enemy also continues to lose positions, in the zerzhinsky direction our troops have expanded the zone of control in the central part of the city, there residential areas are gradually coming under our control, battles for leonidovka also continue, in the sofia direction battles continued in northern part. of the city on the ustupochki bridgehead in the area of ​​kalinovka and grigorovka. there are important changes on the seversk salient, this is the complete liberation of verkhnekamenskoye . the ministry of defense reported today, this really brings our troops closer to further advancement to seversk. in the krasnolimansk direction, we have small successes in the nevsky area, in the krasnolimansk direction we continued to advance west of peschanoye, we have advancement in the makeyevka area and. in the petropavlovka area, here the front also continues to move, on in the kharkov direction there were positional battles,

volchansky, liptsy deep and quiet, well in the kursk direction our troops also advanced a little in the eastern part of the salient, there the enemy also sells true losses, in general, as we see, the situation is developing and for our troops is favorable. thank you very much, boris tatsanovich, i am sure that it will remain so in the future, now we are leaving for a short advertisement and will return in a few moments. the man who was the first in the usa to arm ukraine, revelation of the former head the cia and us secretary of state mike pompeo. there is hope that the russians will come to the conclusion that...

they think that we need to negotiate with russia, give them some territory of ukraine, but the position of ukraine is completely different. i understand, but we would like to see the prospects of winning. the united states has a national idea, to rule the whole world. any ukrainian who considers america his friend is a fool. we are just using this poor country. premiere, the vavan and lexus show. today on the first. he will win, bourbon stearsman, a product of the stellar group, awesome, i hope this is your dad, i hope, dad, dad, please, i'm your son, probably, in a good way,

it won't work out between us, little one here, no friends, all business partners. do you want me to be your friend, okay, how much money do you need to leave my family alone, i don't need money, june, premiere of a tv series, on friday, after voice children, were you looking for me, dmitry kipel, yeah, well i knew this would happen someday, i don't have any more money, he knows about it, so not for the money, wait, you have another million. you haven't sold your kidney yet, why would he need you? the money was given to him personally, he received 2 million in hand, i'm one of those, i'm just another victim like that, who he swindled out of money, i let go of this situation, if i have the opportunity to make this person feel bad, i would do it with great pleasure, she stole money from my account for the first time in her life, i

know my own mother very well and i know when she's lying, she said: either you sue your friend, or i don't have any more... "well how can i sue my friend the prime minister, manipulators on saturday on the first, if a man asks you for money, run away from him, if you want to get an idea of ​​the mood of the people, talk to the taxi driver, he is strong, always self-confident, sometimes it is difficult with a man, well, istanbul is also a difficult city." the turks walk with their heads turned back, wedged by the grandeur of the past gone forever. please tell me how i should address you, your highness, but in short, yes. on the night before the assault constantinople, the orchestra played until the morning, the byzantines were stunned.

if you don't have any photos? strange, where are they? were they here? lord, how similar to mine, you are the only real witness, the only person he came to openly. well, major, has the hunt begun? confrontation, the premiere of the legendary book by yulian semenov. there is a big game on the air, despite the obvious inability of ukraine, not to mention winning, even to hold out.

will define a new era in international relations, a small number of countries, in the first place russia, in turn, in partnership with iran and north korea, as well as china, are determined to change the fundamental principles

of the international system, despite differences in forms of government, ideology, interests and capabilities, all of these releaseist powers seek to strengthen autocratic rule at home and expand spheres of influence abroad, all of them seek to undermine what underlies america's power, its military and technological superiority, the dominance of the dollar and its unrivaled a network of alliances and partnerships. well, pay attention here that, firstly, blinken equates the world order with american dominance, and honestly writes that yes, russia is encroaching on the dominance of the united states, secondly, pay attention that russia, not china, but russia from blinken's point of view is the main revisionist, here china, north korea and iran have kind of joined it. how are the united states going to fight this coalition of revisionists, using blinken's words, he also wrote this in this article. let's hear it. the biden administration's response to the growing convergence of revisionist

powers has been to bring nato allies closer together to face the threat. we 've made nato bigger, stronger, and more united than ever before. finland and sweden have joined the alliance, despite their long histories of neutrality. we've expanded cooperation with our partners in the indo-pacific and modernized our military, strengthening the u.s. military posture, signing new agreements to refit bases from japan to the philippines, and south pacific. after russia launched the war, some in the united states argued that american support for ukraine would divert resources from the standoff with china. our actions have proven otherwise. the standoff with russia has played a decisive role in bringing asia and europe together in an unprecedented rapprochement, as they increasingly view their security as indivisible. global coalition in support of ukraine. since the start of the conflict, washington has provided $94 billion in aid to ukraine, while partners in europe, asia and elsewhere

almost 148 billion dollars. i would say, a manifesto of a global bloc approach. not only are there blocs in europe and asia, but there is also a consolidation of these blocs with each other, against those countries that he considers revisionist. the americans are scattered. stupid bloc thinking, in which he is right, and the stupid and even dumber, are sometimes right in something. blinken is right that the world

is changing, spheres of influence are now being divided, already now before our eyes, and what the world will be like in the future is happening, is being built already now, in this he is undoubtedly right, in which he is wrong strategically, he proceeds from the fact that american hegemony can still be preserved. torn away from russia and china, he also will not allow america to retain its place as hegemon, what is the danger of such bloc thinking, from which all reasonable countries now want to move away, we see the danger in the example of the middle east, this is a fire in ...

confirms that - the current american mainstream elites resemble the bourbons of the restoration period, and the period of louis xviii after the napoleonic wars, which are very well characterized characterized taleriran, yes, that they have forgotten nothing and learned nothing, that's the same thing, yes, the same thing, well, and we remember how the july monarchy ended in france, yes, uh, it ended in a revolution, yes, that's it -

a great world revolution against the remnants...

and by the way, yesterday in the united states, this night already in moscow, yesterday according to american time, debates of the vice-presidential candidates were created, respectively, the republican candidates for vice president are jaydee vance and the democrats are tim walls. usually the vice presidential debates don't get much attention and don't have much impact on the elections, but this is a unique case for two reasons: first, because it's probably the last debate before november 5th, which is the election. and there probably won't be a second round of debates between trump and kamala harris, the second reason is that these debates were normal, polite and decent compared to what we 've seen in the united states in recent years. let's listen to it cnn's assessment of the matter. the debate between the candidates for the post of vice president of the united states,

which featured ohio senator j.d. vance and minnesota governor tim walts, went well, which is becoming increasingly rare in modern american politics. during the meeting, which is unlikely to change the course of the presidential race, both candidates were friendly with each other, made attacks on the presidential candidates and focused on policy differences. vance repeatedly attacked vice president kamala harris on the issue border security, while walts chided former president donald trump for repealing abortion rights. surprisingly, the normal debate ended with another stunningly normal episode. for the first time in decades of presidential debates, the candidates shook hands, chatted without microphones, and waited for their wives to join them. can you imagine how far the country has had to go before a normal, decent debate is perceived as something at all, as something miraculous, right? it just goes to show the degree of degradation of the current american

political elite. well, the debates were really devoted almost entirely to domestic political issues. the topic of ukraine and the ukrainian crisis was not touched upon by anyone at all, which is also very important, because it shows how unimportant it is for the american voter today. well, and it seems to me that the most interesting moment in these debates was the dispute over what is the main threat to democracy in the united states, because both the presenters, which...

democracy, but unfortunately, that's not the threat that kamala harris and tim walds want to talk about, and that threat is censorship. americans are turning away from long-time friends over policy disagreements. big tech companies are silencing our fellow citizens, and kamala harris says that instead of debating and convincing her fellow americans, she wants to censor people who spread misinformation. i think that 's a much bigger threat to democracy than everything we've seen in this country in the last 4 years, in the last 40 years. we don't have to agree on every issue, but we are united by the basic principle of the first amendment of the u.s. constitution, which is that we have to discuss our differences. kamala harris is pushing mass censorship. aleksandr viksirovich, your assessment, do you agree with that with jaydee wensam and. by the way, should i already say that there are some people in the united states who are proposing to rewrite the first amendment of the constitution, which he mentioned? well, indeed, under the biden administration, we

saw serious tension in the direction of, well , essentially, the information doctrine. and the collision is that today not only political circles are subject to censorship, but also commercially, which is what vers said, wilson at the time, announcing the doctrine of protecting democracy throughout the world, with which we began to observe america's totalitarian controls over the unipolar world component, and it was broken by the teeth of hillary clinton, who found enemies within the country against whom it was necessary to fight, to fight precisely with the help of police lawlessness, police states.

in relation to activists of political figures , after all, many criminal cases under biden have been opened precisely in terms of censoring the information that they provide, and today, naturally, the threat to them is the media, because they

are moving beyond the states along the path of becoming a totalitarian state in this case, well , censorship totalitarianism is a threat within the united states, and one of the serious threats to international security, i would call the degradation of political elites and not only in the united states, but in europe, where it seems to me, the level of this degradation is much deeper, here is a clear example of this degradation is the new nato secretary general, mark ruth, he only took up this post yesterday, look, after...

of course, we hear regular threats from the kremlin, it is true, putin's nuclear rhetoric is reckless and irresponsible, but at the same time, let me be clear, we do not see any imminent threat of the use of nuclear weapons, that's what i want to say about this, let him talk about his nuclear arsenal, because he wants us to talk about his nuclear arsenal, and i think we shouldn't do that, we need to focus on the fact that there is no threat of nuclear weapons being used right now, and that's important and in general. not just in the nuclear sense, but in a broader sense, if you give in to threats from putin, it will create a precedent in which the use of military force allows a country to achieve what it wants, and we cannot allow that. well, apparently, rut lives in some kind of his own

world, because those changes in the nuclear doctrine, which putin named, they greatly expand the number of situations in which russia can use nuclear weapons, including a proxy war, including the launch of any strike weapons against russia, and not ... lithuania, and gabrielius lansberges. lithuanian foreign minister gabrielius lansberges said in an interview that putin's threats of escalation were largely empty, and allowing ukraine to strike russia with long-range missiles would not lead to significant changes. lansberges added that even if moscow will escalate the conflict, it will be a necessary risk, since this war must be won, according to him, the worst possible consequences will be if ukraine loses this war. can you imagine, ivan pavlovich, that is, the worst consequence for

lansberges is not the destruction of lithuania, no matter what conventional or non-conventional weapons, it is if ukraine loses the war, yes, and even if there is an escalation, says lansberges, that is, if a war between russia and nato begins, which will certainly end in total the disappearance of the baltics, this is an acceptable risk, because this is a war, how can you even get such a scam, well, you know, by the way, if we start with rutta's speech. and one gets the impression that after our supreme commander-in-chief put a period to the nada, and accordingly the united states and the supreme commander-in-chief there understood what was happening, in fact, they assessed all the risks, hid, they appointed, as you know, at the royal court, yes, the king is silent, and the jester there says what the king seems to be saying thinks, but is afraid to say, here is the same one, here is clearly and... clearly appointed to

a slightly modified role of nato secretary general, that is, the content is somewhat changed, it is clear that this means that london and the us will increasingly carefully react to possible changes in the general context of this global conflict, in fact. this person is appointed to say stupid things, because well, what he just said, as if you know, he was present somewhere, well, i don’t know, he watched a movie, he was gone all day, and he didn’t know that it happened in parliament, let's say, and he came and spoke, it turns out, but the political situation is completely different, here it's the same thing, clearly an appointed, that is, a buffoon, who will continue to, that is, throw in all sorts of different statements, despite the fact that they will always be empty. remember his predecessor, he tried to somehow group everyone,

send them to help ukraine and so on, he threatened, there with his finger to everyone, that is, he traveled around the countries, pointed, this one will clearly be doing something else, this one will go out, declare, and the more he declares, the more empty his statements will be, well in any case, we have no illusions about what nato is, what today's europe is, what the united states is, so i want to return to the words of sergei alekseevich ribkov. "we are ready for this long-term confrontation, now a short advertisement , let's talk about the situation in the middle east, sovremennik, chaika, for tomorrow, you and i, zhord, are you crazy, these are my mother's things, they were once, these are not yours, and you are nobody here, do you hear, you are a puppy, just try." to father something against to yelp, you

won't be able to sing so high anymore, that means you needed me, only while i could sing, and now that's it, they threw me out, and the choir, the premiere of a multi-part film, watch after the program vremya, for the eightieth anniversary of alexander mikhailov, yoshkin kot, a new hero has appeared, luxurious, tall, slender, fit, smart, when he goes on stage.

and my husbands had no influence on me, get away from someone else's husband's wife, how basov reacted to your pregnancy, disappeared, who accompanied you to the maternity hospital, i don't know, his assistants, me in the maternity hospital everyone regretted how valentina tetova left vladimir basov, and what the director wrote in the statement to the court, filed for alimony, why

didn't you take the children with you, and where did you just mother, yes, you want to ask me now, where did i put the money, confession? others saw, i saw how they tried to manually turn a stupid tit into a crane, so that it would not see the blue distance and not tear itself away from the ground, they roughly ringed the crane, put a mark in the journal, hid it in the closet, tied

the wings of the white bird of my happiness, so that it would breathe warm dust and not plot anything, but... it's not for nothing that the bird in the sky grew stronger, fools remained fools, a broken cage, a pile of ashes, and the crane is back in the clouds, by teacher's day, we'll live until monday, sunday is on the first, and do you know what he wrote in his essay, well now no one will know, he wrote happiness, it's when they understand you, what, where, when? autumn series of games from october 6, on the first. in the new season on the first. ekaterina petrovna, why are you taking pictures like you're taking a passport photo. that's it, katya, the main thing is to relax. relax and think about your sasha. katya, come to me. oh, you say, let's

break up, fine. i don't want to break up with you. but here you are. and a young father, congratulations, congratulations with all my heart, guest, bone, he sees, oh, let's have children, well, you wanted a child, a family, you think that anna is still capable of working, i vouch for her, girls, just don't swear, i think i missed a clue, how can you be so vindictive and petty. i fight for my children , for my wife, these are not trifles, i offer you a deal, i don't want to dirty my hands, dangerous cases bring together, little gray mouse, lichev, i will arrest you for disrupting the operation, i am going with you,

thank you, no, no, no, yes, cipher, new episodes from october 7. on the first. the big game is on air. the middle east is rapidly breaking into a cycle of escalation. direct military clashes between israel and iran have already begun and the night before iran did launch a direct missile strike on israel in response to a whole series of aggressions, provocations. which israel committed, in response to the murder of ismail hani, the former leader of hamas in tehran, in response to the murder of beiruti, the former leader of hezbollah hassan nasrallah and commander of the alkutz forces, this is part of the islamic revolutionary guard corps, brigadier general abbas nilfarushan, here is the iranian

response, it seems to me, was on the one hand very spectacular, and of course we all watched these shots, the arrival of iranian missiles among. this is what iranian president masoud pazheskian said. based on legitimate rights for the purpose of peace and security for iran and the region , a decisive response was given to the aggression of zionism. regime, this action was carried out in defense of the interests and citizens of iran. let netanyahu knows that iran is not a belligerent country, but it will firmly confront any

threat, this is only part of our strength. do not enter into conflict with iran. well, israel is going to enter into a direct conflict with iran, more and more western media, for example, аксcious and the wall street journal, are discussing with reference to their sources in israel and in the biden administration that. and israel, among other things, may strike iran's nuclear facilities on iranian territory and the opposition is also talking about this, not even only netanyahu's government, but also opposition members of israel, the israeli elite, here's what the new york times writes. after iran's attack, which launched about 180 missiles in half an hour, israel faced the question of not whether to strike... but how powerful the strike would be, said retired maj. gen. yaakov amedror, netanyahu's former national security adviser. he added that

a strike on iran's nuclear facilities cannot be ruled out, which have long been a concern for israel, which fears that tehran will develop own nuclear weapons. former israeli prime minister naftali bennett wrote on his social networks that israel has the best opportunity in the last 50 years to change the face of the region. we must act now to... iran's nuclear program, its main energy facilities, to deal a fatal blow to this terrorist regime, we have seriously damaged the tentacles of this octopus, now is the time to hit the head - bennett said, speaking of iran. how high is the risk of strikes on iranian nuclear facilities now, well, they are also talking about strikes on iranian oil facilities and so on, but it seems to me that strikes on nuclear facilities could have the most serious consequences, then it is definitely...

no, but tactically he is planning such strikes, now together with the americans they are deciding to strike super-sensitive facilities, which you mentioned, these are nuclear facilities, oil facilities, but the americans have not yet signed up for this, especially the biden administration, the democrats, they are not giving the green light for this, but here netanyahu can play, as he has already played his game, and can break through some. option, with trump there would be no doubt, if trump wins the us elections, then a big war

starts there immediately. yakov amedrora, although he does not currently hold an official position, is an informed person, he knows that blows will be dealt, here is what nawtali bennett says, firstly, it is alarming that this is said by a person who, well, actually, is a little in opposition to netanyahu and said this, the same. and yes, absolutely right, and we see euphoria, euphoria that now engulfs many israeli politicians, from those tactical successes, which must be acknowledged, were achieved by them, many israeli political scientists pay attention to this with great concern, and not only the left, who sharply criticize netanyahu, but also the centrists, who ask themselves whether this euphoria will harm israel itself, after all? playing with fire, you can get burned, well, indeed, you rightly said that even

though the united states is not interested in a full-scale escalation in its own involvement in this conflict, israel, as it is has done it many times, can ignore it, this is the opinion of the united states, yes, israel ignored the overt signals of the united states on gas, the overt signals of the united states on lebanon, why shouldn't it ignore it.

do you think salevan is hinting at direct strikes on iranian territory, again, considering that the united states is not interested in such an escalation, because look, yesterday the price of oil rose by 3%, and imagine how the price of oil will rise on the eve of the presidential elections the us elections, if a full-scale war starts, especially with the involvement of the united states, yes, that's the first, second, well, of course, donald trump will simply move into the white house in case again.

the party wins, if suddenly kamala harris is in power, his prospects will be questionable, to drag the us administration today so that it gets into absolute trouble and can't get out later, this is a completely sane tactic on his part, because he understands that washington cannot abandon him, israel cannot abandon him, salevan is great understands that this breaks the entire us strategy in the middle east, that the us is ceasing to be any significant arbiter. for the middle east, but for this, to restore this position, some extreme violence will be required, yes, compared to today, if we continue to move along the same path, that is, in this regard, everything that the united states planned in the region, those stakes they find themselves under threat, but all that remains for him is to puff out his cheeks, in fact, he strives to do so that netanyahu was not too harsh, he would not

have drawn in too deeply, for the simple reason that... to say, no, they cannot, at the same time , the middle east funnel itself, i would say separately, it has already formed, that is, in this regard, it turns out that all the participants are slowly sliding down, down, down, and the steps may differ quite a bit in time, but all the same, these are steps down, this confrontation, which began with the violation of all the rules of the game, with the violation of everything else, this funnel has significantly deepened, and the speed of dives is not also accelerated, the situation resembles a funnel, this is written about by the famous columnist, new york times, thomas friedman, who says that yes, all parties are drawn into this funnel, with a high probability there will be a direct military clash, not only between israel and iran, it is already happening, but also between the united states and iran and the red lines are erased, they simply no longer exist, exactly what you were talking about, and many american publications are now characterizing the policy of the united states, the word impotence, sullivan

really this series, when if you can't stop some process. united states, but the famous british commentator gideon rachman believes that the war in the middle east could seriously affect the american elections. let's listen. the chances that america will not support israel in a moment of crisis are always small, but they are further reduced by the fact that there is just over a month left before the us presidential election. kamala haris cannot risk being soft on iran, with which the us has a long history of confrontation, dating back to the hostage crisis of 1979-81. however, the current dangerous situation could create problems for haris.

donald trump likes to talk about how during his time in office there was. throughout the world, the weakness of the biden administration has led to wars in europe and the middle east. the new escalation fits perfectly into this rhetoric. every time there is a presidential election in america, there is talk of a possible october surprise that will turn the tide of the election race for a few weeks before the vote. israel and iran have delivered an october surprise, and trump may end up the winner. an october surprise? i think so, if the united states continues to indulge the ambitions of the netanyahu cabinet to pursue an aggressive military policy towards the islamic republic, then in reality this fits very well into the doctrine in the middle east that donald trump actually promoted, i don’t know what forces he used, but peace really reigned under him, and blows were struck at territory of syria, but they were

limited. we must not forget that... in the structure of the democratic party, there are still pro-palestinian sentiments, and those huge actions that are taking place in the united states in support of palestine. and we remember that this even influenced the meeting of haris with netanyahu during his visit to the united states, which indicates that a certain tension is brewing within the democratic party, they understand that this is in trump's favor, and most importantly, today they should not abandon their ally, because they are with countries of the region, with egypt, with other states, agree that israel could conduct these operations, and accordingly. understands that in the united states, in essence, there is now a period of turmoil, because at the head of the president, who essentially no longer makes decisions, and there are extermination heads who are today spinning ukraine and the middle east, and yes, they need at least some kind of

victory, even in the middle east, because they lost ukraine, so i completely agree with you, and ivan pavlovich, look, it seems to me, from a military point of view, a very important an element of what happened last night is the demonstration of iran's possession of hypersonic missiles and the fact that they can reach cerium, that's the first thing, secondly, now israel is saying that we will strike iran's nuclear facilities. the logic of deterrence says that if the threat is inevitable, strike first. is israel not asking for a preventive, preemptive strike from iran, with hypersonic missiles, much stronger than the neat strike that iran launched late last night and with...

if iran decides to launch a massive strike, and with weapons like this, it will of course change the course of events in principle. now in the middle east, because it will demonstrate iran's readiness for a full-scale confrontation, which, as we understand, look at the map, cannot be determined by territorial clashes, it is only a struggle of aviation and missiles with the help of various missiles and, of course, space groups, so israel has shown what it is capable of, and israel in this sense, you know, it is now just... well, it doesn't win the situation, why? because what iran is capable of, nobody knows yet. iran's missile program has been proven to be of a high level, but nobody knows how much of what it has,

because the iranians are masters of information warfare, and they cast shadows very well. exactly, well, by the way, the time of this strike, the nature of this strike, also became a certain surprise on the part of iran, well, in any case, the situation is very dangerous, israel proves that it has no red lines. the last demonstration - the fact that he declared the un secretary general persona nonggrat, this is the bankruptcy of american politics, the bankruptcy of american politics. we hand over the floor to the news and the big game will be back at 17. this is the news on the first. hello, in the studio of valery korablyov, in this issue. plus another village of verkhnekamenskoye liberated in the donetsk republic and the enemy's escape from ugledar. bsu withdraws its units from a strategically important city.