hello, live on channel one, the program time will tell, i am artem shenin, and today we have an interesting, so to speak, situation, today we can start the program, exactly from the very point, from the very place where we ended it yesterday, since yesterday, almost at the end of our broadcast, news came about what you see on your screens, and... but here is the truth with the definition of what you see on your screens, yesterday after the broadcast, and all evening, all night until the morning, well, it was quite there are many discrepancies, because well, they talk about iran's missile strike on israel, but they show these shots, yesterday at the end of the broadcast we showed exactly these shots, which we received live on international video exchange channels. and despite the fact that later in the evening i

specifically watched and saw a lot of things, a huge number of shots appeared, which were also supposedly about this, but in fact, god knows where these shots came from, including some skilled shots, well, we live in the era of hype, everyone needs to be the first to have their own option, that is, to launch, up to the point that someone placed the launched work of the israeli dome in the opposite direction, when well , all this flies there, and the launch...

such a strike, as it looked at the very beginning for many, immediately again this began, began, or it was not at all from a military point of view a strike with the aim of hitting some military targets, that is, it was a strike by military-technical means, but with some other purpose, this is also an important point, in any case, everyone was waiting all night for what would happen at night, that's it nothing happened in this regard at night, though iran continued to work on... regarding what happened yesterday evening, which i still avoid defining in more detail, we will talk about this with my esteemed guests, if you listen to the different, well, two sides of what happened, then you get the feeling that there were two completely different strikes, that iran. struck one

blow, here in the statement voiced by the chief of the general staff of the iranian army, it sounds like this, please, tonight it is necessary the space forces of the islamic guard corps the revolutions took revenge for many of the crimes of the zionist regime, three major israeli air bases and the headquarters of massat were hit, as well as the base at fatima, which has f-35 fighters, anti-missile radars and tank clusters were hit and...

that iran can, and that if it is not heard, it can be worse, in confirmation of the fact that it can be worse, more painful, there are headlines about the first use of hypersonic weapons, headlines about the fact that these missiles arrived and hit the air base, yesterday there were data about some mythical twenty f-35s. israeli, about which yesterday there were doubts, and today no one seems to remember these f-35s, because, well , judging by everything, they remained in the headlines, but about the base it is not very clear, because israel in turn does not comment on any of this, does not say anything about any arrivals, saying naturally that most of them were intercepted, although some flew somewhere, and at the same time it is indicative that the number of... casualties among the israelis,

among the population, practically none, the only casualty was a palestinian who was hit by a piece of debris with a broken rocket. that is, nothing is said about the casualties, and e is another confirmation that it all looked very alarming, but was it not clear to them that the israeli airspace was opened 40 minutes after this strike, that is, 40 minutes after this iranian terrible, terrible, terrible strike, everyone already knew that nothing more would happen, because they opened the airspace, i... i don't know how this explain, probably, there are some explanations for this too, well, regarding what everyone was waiting for at night, and israel made a statement through the mouth of an official representative of the israel defense forces that they are in a state of heightened readiness and that they will choose

a time to carry out this strike, which by the way mirrors previous statements by iran, when very painful strikes were carried out on... on people or on objects or on organizations that are very sensitive for iran, that we will respond, we will respond very harshly, but we will respond at a convenient time time in a way convenient for us, that is, here is such a mirror, and what was it in fact, what was it, some kind of military-technical, so to speak, operation, or is all this still some kind of information history, we will discuss with you right after the advertisement, because it is important. history not only regarding what is happening in the middle east, this is the most important history of what is happening and what can happen in the world in general, considering that this is a region of the most important interests for our strategic enemy in the person of the united states of america, so all these

questions are not only about the middle east, for all its importance, don't switch, the man who was the first in the us to arm ukraine, the revelation of the former head. cia and us secretary of state mike pompeo. there is hope that the russians will come to the conclusion that they want to join the eu, they want to be part of this western trading system. we need to return the russians to the european, not the asian model. publicly says that any weapon will hit the territory of russia and at the same time here behind the scenes tells us that we still need to russia to return it to us. i really appreciate your help with the javelin supplies. it was right for america. we understood it right away, it was right for america, not for ukraine, some republicans think that we need to negotiate with russia, give them some territory of ukraine, but ukraine's position is completely different. i understand, but we would like to see the prospects of winning. the united states has a national idea,

to rule the whole world. any ukrainian who considers america his friend is a fool. we are just using this poor country. premiere. vavan and lexus show, today on the first. what do you think about trump's possible presidential campaign? he will win. i don't have any more money, he knows about it, so don't go. wait, you have another million, you haven't sold your kidney yet, why does he need you? the money was transferred to him personally, he received 2 million in hand. i am one of these, i am just another such victim, which he...

from him for the eightieth birthday of alexander mikhailov, yoshkin kot, a new hero has appeared, luxurious, tall, slender, fit, smart, when he goes on stage, it's a standing ovation, and sometimes just a, do not judge lest you be judged, my father told me at our first meeting, at which i, of course, bristled at the wolf cubs, how could you betray your mother, who gave you your whole life, like that you offended your mother, and meet mine.

alexander mikhailov, cinema, love and doves. on saturday, on the first. in the new season on the first. faster, so already, even faster, take a bag and put all the trinkets in it, and if not, can there be killers in the dosas, killers can be everywhere, we need to send the mur on the trail, they are after all they don't even know yet that there is such a gang, the ten, the ministry of internal affairs finally found out what you do with your girlfriends, you have no right to break into houses, this is valery's blood, are you again from me? what are you doing, you are again getting into the investigation, i suggest you become

the new analytical department of the ministry of internal affairs. i checked all the similar cases in the archive, in the last month alone there were two similar murders, both victims were bandits, and this is marina valeryanovna kurzun, she will be your curator. what are your methods? i just never received your personal files, how did you working? let's go, pack our bags, we have a plane soon. shifor. new episodes from october 7 on the first. istanbul gives me the impression of a certain mystery. is it a woman's city? it is a woman's city, i would say, yes. our geographical position is special. we are in the western part of the east in the eastern part of the west. it is the center of a cultural mosaic. you say that you are a secular modern woman, but you are not dressed at all. not at all like a modern woman, but it does not matter, all this can be changed, that is where it is important, that is what

must be modern, there are many parallels between russia and turkey, this is where the white russians settled, brought their own color, there is an assumption, we are very similar to each other, oh well, vladimir pozner's new project, turkish notebook , october 7. on the first, the program time will tell, we continue to work live, we continue to discuss live what it was or how, at least, how to relate to what happened yesterday, which formally looked like a blow inflicted by iran on the territory israel, which was positioned this way, but with very important nuances by the iranian side, and

we are discussing this, as i already said, going into advertising, not only because it is important what is happening in such an important region of the world, where so many interests have converged, but also because in this particular case, and this is a very sensitive issue for the united states of america, because depending on what the consequences will be and will be... the united states, which is our strategic adversary at the moment, that's why the question of the prospects for assessing the further development of the situation here, it is very sensitive for us for many reasons, in this sense i have already started discussing that yesterday first these... i, by the way, noticed that there are even people or telegram channels that , whenever something starts there, they are

like, well, here we go, like the third world war, well , it's amazing that even many of these people in this situation yesterday, having seen this blow, did not write like that, i thought, aha, well, that means, this is like something completely different interesting, because even they haven't gotten going yet, and to be honest, somewhere after an hour or two, after it became clear that no one had died, that the airspace, as i already... said, was opened there in 40 minutes, that this is something like this, not what it looked like in the first minutes, i even took a risk yesterday and wrote on my site that well, it produces in telegram, it gives the impression of a technical negotiator, but by technical negotiator i did n't mean that of course iran and israel directly agreed, let's do it pretending that we will strike, let's pretend that, like, here, here, and that these are some actions that look like... a powerful military escalation, but in fact it does not relate to military-technical escalation, to something

else, and tasks are solved by military instruments, not purely military, even, as strange as it may sound, perhaps partly diplomatically, so i will give you two more statements from the iranian side, which, it seems to me, confirm this point of view, please, the missile operation of the islamic revolutionary guard corps showed only part on... missile potential, and its other component, high-tech deadly missiles, was not used. if the zionist regime takes new measures, we will use more diverse weapons. if a war starts in the region... we will act more intensively, if, if, if, if that, if that, if that, and this is the minister of defense, and it is interesting, it is important, it seems to me, to note that both the minister of defense of iran and the minister of foreign affairs of iran, they say almost exactly the same thesis, listen to the minister of foreign affairs, we have carried out

self-defense under article 51 of the un charter by striking solely at... our actions will be complete unless the israeli regime decides to retaliate further. in that case, our response will be more decisive. those who assist israel now have an increased responsibility to rein in the warmongers in tel aviv, instead of interfering with their madness. so, just 2 days ago, if we had heard the phrase iran launched a missile, a massive missile attack on israel, we would all have said: no, well, that.

meaning: yes, indeed, now, if we make such a comparison for today, iran, of course, is emotionally and informationally leading in this situation. how much talk there was, that the israelis, they allow themselves what they want, iran does not react, how would they go to negotiations, remember, there was this information, that there was an agreement that iran, as it were, does not interfere, does not give a retaliatory strike on israel, but at the same time israel does not attack lebanon and so on, a powerful missile attack. this is not just a powerful missile attack, this is the first time in the entire military history of humanity, a massive raid by huge ballistic missiles. these are not small missiles, these are missiles 15 to 17 meters long, some of them weigh more than 10 tons. this is the same as our intercontinental ballistic missiles driving across red square, they just have a slightly worse technology, so they are, so to speak, like flying barrels, 181

missiles flew, this is a lot, and this is not all that uranus has. wait, at this moment i am asking you, as a military expert, a question from an absolute amateur who yesterday watched all this on tv, read all this is in the telegram, and he is also like 180 missiles, hypersonic, everything flew, you tyn-ty, like, these words that you say, this is not just some kind of blow, this is a powerful missile attack, this, and then this layman, this amateur, i read, so, so, there are no casualties, no destruction, so, like...

devices, but we will not tell you about them, so, yes, so, i do not know the exact characteristics, they are probably closed there, but conditionally, there are one, two, one, three days, each satellite has a characteristic when it can filming the same point, that is, it flies around the earth and flies in, it can film, so the first thing is that iran knew exactly where it was hitting, it knew where what objects were, where the planes were, and so on, the second point

is that it really did strike military targets, we don’t know, is it along the runway, is it on... hangars, planes or something else, we will find out a little later, but the fact that the footage, which, given that israel does not comment on this, of course, moreover, israel banned it, said, there will be serious responsibility, we don’t know, criminal or administrative or fines for those citizens who will film the landings in the form of defeats, explosions and so on, all the information has disappeared, there are probably no citizens at military bases who can film this, well, the soldiers who serve there can always film this, well, it is clear that for them this is a high risk of liability, yeah, so i think that... in a day, in two, iran will show, let's say, where it struck, it will be visible at which bases, because the filming of this navatim base, where the f35 planes were located, including american, well, there is just no...

the largest joint military air exercise of israel and the united states, called juniper oak 23, which practiced a massive raid of american f-35 stealth aircraft, israeli b-52 aircraft plus tankers on iran. yeah. moreover, they flew along iran, they checked the air defense systems, that is, they have already worked out this design, how they will hit. for the administration in the white house, they have two points now from the point of view of the near.

escalation, and israel, you tell me, is

understands perfectly well, and the answer that israel is talking about is not another puffing up of their cheeks, this time on their part, but this is preparation for further escalation, military, yes, i will explain, i will explain here, i do not exclude that this is already a planned plan of the americans with the israelis, let's imagine that ... if there had not been this raid, israel would have fought in libya, in lebanon, who, why so many f-35 aircraft, why american aircraft carriers, who is there to contain turkey so that it does not attack, or some neighboring countries, no, that is, this is excessive forces, this was, of course, in order to work, including in response to iran, submarines, which have now arrived in large numbers with tomahawks, 154 pieces per submarine, including, that is, george, this weapon on... this was already in advance, it all happened last week, it was all already being pulled there, that is, there is a feeling that either the intelligence knew this in advance, or they understood that iran would not be able not

to do this, most likely it would have to strike, which, including israel or the americans, would allow the creation of a coalition, strike at them, why in my understanding, i may be wrong, israel cannot but respond, because the level of violence that it is now doing in the middle east, it is so extreme that now all... arab islamic states, well, are on the verge of uniting to go on a real ground operation against israel, including turkey. and if it is now, and it is stopping this process for now with very harsh, well, military methods, these are strikes on, you know, cities, these are strikes on the leadership, this is terrorism in the form of exploding pagers and so on and so forth, well, that is, conventionally speaking, last week a blow was struck at syria, at yemen and so on, that is, they very... harshly respond, say: don't twitch, don't get involved, otherwise the same situation will happen, and other countries sit and think, well, of course we can go to the largest army in the region, egypt, we could participate, yes, they don't want to, they understand. that

from the massive erdogan is like that from the podium he is like that, yes, we, we generally know how he helped the gaza strip, just so far everyone remember how he helped here, but it was true, he did it from the un rostrum, then somehow like with the gaza sector, by the way, now when you spoke right under your words, literally at the time when you spoke in confirmation of your words, then deputy secretary of state of the united states campbell, and about your first words, our main one. "let's be very careful in everything we do with respect to iran, this is a direct illustration of one of your thesis, here it came, we were already on the air, it was 1848, the second, then, his thesis, again confirmation of your words, the united states along with israel is thinking about it, the us, along with israel , are thinking about options for responding to an iranian attack on israeli territory, that is, this..."

confirmation of what you are talking about, that this is possible, even a pre-developed plan, a step-by-step escalation, you understand that there will be retaliatory actions, there will be no ground operation on either side, it will be a remote war, on the part of iran, these will be missiles, on the part of israel and the groups that will be with them, these will be f35 aircraft, they do not have missiles, in fact in fact, israel also has erihon missiles, but they are exclusively sharpened under a nuclear warhead, which they can also strike, if. escalation rises to such a level when iran starts hitting cities, like in childhood, who will win, a sambo wrestler or a karotist? well, on the one hand missiles, on the other hand planes, got it, these are very interesting - very interesting, let's say, explanation of what happened in terms of what can happen, and this partly explains what we will now discuss further, uh,

here's bloomberg, for example. to the question you say that maybe they were calculating that iran couldn't help but respond at some point, and they did discuss it, but listen to bloomberg. tehran's response was aimed at demonstrating force, but without causing casualties that could provoke israel. the intended message was clear. we don't want a real war, but if it comes to it, see what we can do. but instead, the attack demonstrated weakness. it showed israel that iran has no capabilities. the reluctance to retaliate, the subsequent israeli retaliation, one precise strike that destroyed air defenses near the iranian nuclear facility, left no doubt about the capabilities and intentions of israel. i leave the precise strike that destroyed iranian air defenses on bloomberg's conscience. i kept waiting for you to say this and even tried to throw it at you, but in general, no one except bloomberg sees the results of this strike, well, bloomberg has a lot of this, since they write three, two in mind,

here are a lot of such phrases, which show that bloomberg is playing on the side that this describes, that iran, that is, responded with this mistake, because they responded toothlessly, and that means that now they have shown their weakness, within the framework of the plan that you described, well, it looks like preparation for this plan, moreover, the israeli publication jerusalem post publishes the words of an unnamed, though anonymous , that is, official, a high-ranking israeli, who speaks in an even more such spirit, that we must strike at the boorish, they say, also in development here this, when i read this, i couldn't resist writing that this is from the series about the foxes who took matches, went to the blue sea, lit the blue sea, well, these foxes are just becoming more and more outrageous, because they know that the americans are there with their aircraft carriers and so on and so forth, but accordingly, in your

opinion, now all this has... squeezed a retaliatory strike out of iran and now they will respond to it with some of their own or will iran still achieve its goal and will continue to show restraint as long as you know, well first of all, i want to say that this is all information noise, we will kill khaminai, we will strike the iranian nuclear facility, no, maybe there are such plans there, but it is unlikely that what we read in... in the media, especially the israeli ones, is a reflection of real plans and real intentions from the majority of means in the majority, yes, yes, yes, i especially do not want to pay attention to the philistine point of view, this kind of boasting, like, a toothless attack , everything was intercepted in milk, i write it off you know what, yes, when it comes to telegram channels, ordinary people, commentators, i attribute this to normal defense and the reaction of those who

have been proving to us for several months that iran will never strike, they have given up. for me , the trembling hands of mr. netanyahu, who read from a sheet of paper the next threat to the islamic republic of iran, are indicative, i don’t know, maybe it’s age or some kind of illness, which he doesn’t look like a sick person, which they don’t talk about, it’s customary there to say nothing at all, to hide everything, fearing that some extra information will provoke unnecessary thoughts about israel's weakness, and this is evidence of israel's real weakness, there is a lot based on the myth of israel's greatness and invincibility, b - on the real support of the united states of america, without which, it seems to me, israel itself is of little use, but we have seen what their iron dome is capable of, which they

praised for a very long time and a lot in their time. as for the media effect, here you know, as a researcher i am amazed at how fiercely.

in general, will it last for any length of time, everyone basically looked at this project as a project of fanatics, which basically has no right to exist and cannot survive, moreover, i remind everyone that everything that is flying on the screen now, it is all under a fairly large number of sanctions, this is

45 years of unprecedented unprecedented sanctions, this is isolation, you understand, which probably did not exist, well until 2022, when russia faced something similar, we are simply bigger, and we faced this in twenty-second. then, like, 30 years a little relaxed, but as they say, the hands remember, the hands remember, i agree, the iranians were subjected to this in the seventy-ninth year, but despite this, after eight years of bloody, exhausting wounds of the iraqi war, they were able to create a nuclear program, thanks to the founding father of this oh yes, missile program. uh, that is, who, in general, having exclusively soviet scuds, was able, with the help of the dprk, to create what, what iran is demonstrating today. so, is the economy loaded, i continue, yes, about common sense and real expert

the assessment, of course, is loaded, how much they spent to repel not the most expensive and not the newest iranian missiles, a sea of ​​money, if now it is confirmed that they lost at their airfields. perhaps not 20, yes even two, then fighters, yes, these are also very cool, i think, most likely they were already in the air at this time, considering that and the flight time all, apparently, knew in advance, i think they raised the aircraft up, maybe iranian missiles hit the targets, how these targets explode and detonate, that is, we can already say with a certain degree of probability that military facilities were hit, i don’t know on what scale, what...

now we’ll see whether iran is not responding flatly, as is commonly believed, again in... in the common people’s environment, where to say, well, the answer is when they hit you and you hit back. no, but in general, everything that preceded this, this answer was also a response. in general, 2 months of keeping israel and the united states of america in a state of full combat readiness, this is also, this is also a response, here it's like containing iran, according to iranians, is the best way to influence attention, not on israel, so.

that iran, it means, is draining someone there, giving its ideals and negotiating with the americans, no, iran has a clear understanding of what their goal is, their goal, unlike israel's goal, is not to kill, not to clear the territory, not to seem cooler than they really are, they don't need that, but to make themselves respected and even equal, and not even that, their goal is the gaza strip, palestine, it all started there.

that is, everyone was waiting for something like that, what does israel do when it acts harshly, because israel has taught everyone that to act harshly is to kill tens of thousands of civilians in the gaza strip, in hundreds, i think so, in thousands in beirot, but everyone forgets that israel can act there, because these little foxes with matches, they have the united states behind them, iran doesn’t have that, by the way, when you say that iran has a clear s...

then someone else from the seventeen special services and so on, in general, we read the new york times, in mind, we write, we listen, the attack was carried out by the islamic revolutionary guard corps air force and was not an operation by the regular iranian army or air force, according to israeli sources, iranian president masoud pizeshkian was not informed of the attack before it began, the sources said, indicating that the iranian regime is divided over the operation, that...

he's coming, so yes, but nevertheless, a strike on israel is generally a very secular event, it says that - colorful, bright social event, maybe you have to be an ironist to know that in iran there is an army and there is a separate islamic revolutionary guard corps, that the islamic revolutionary guard corps is

responsible, by the way, you have to be an ironist for this, well maybe, well maybe not all, okay, then that's why you invited me here in the very name. this paramilitary organization, yes, the islamic revolutionary guard corps has an encrypted meaning, for what, yes, for what, why and to whom they obey, so that, because that is one of the reasons why, of course, we called you, because you understand this, and i, for example, do not really, that is, from your answer i must draw the following conclusion, that when we read in the new york times,

khamenei, then this should have been the decision , that even if this was the decision of khamenei, it does not say anything, this is an important point, an important point that is important for understanding what is happening here and

what will happen next, and that iran has its own goal and there is an internal mood, internal unity and the strength to go to him, but... but i can artem, one more addition, all these media, when they talk about iran, count on the fact that the world doesn't know iran well, remember the girl mahsa amini, who was allegedly killed because a lock of hair fell out from under her hijab, authoritative media also talked about this, and all at once, but forgive me, it is enough to visit iran once to understand that they don't kill for this there, it's true, you just need to visit iran once, and it's not that difficult to do, not at all complicated.

us interests are present, which means that yesterday's story is also interesting because of who the us was and who it appeared to be. andrey has already said that in his opinion, the americans were initially planning something together with israel, and they pretended to be a little different, but yesterday, after iran's response, they stopped pretending and, in general, well, let's say, came a little closer to... the expression turned out to be ineffective, this was primarily the result of the professionalism of the israeli defense forces, but to a large extent was made possible by the skilled

work of the american military and careful joint planning in the lead-up to the attack. we will consult with the israelis on the next steps in response. this is a serious escalation by iran. we will be monitoring what the right next steps are to protect american interests and achieve stability. we have made it clear that there will be consequences, serious consequences, for this attack. that is, the americans occupy, or rather they always have occupied it. pro-israeli position, this is natural, the question is how tough they are ready to continue to take it, how forced are they to take it now, because they have trump hanging over the administration, as soon as they are not tough enough somewhere, he will immediately tell them, you are betraying an ally, there was no such nonsense in my presence, and the publication. vaxios also tells us that the americans are trying to somehow steer, but steer, the situation where

it is said that israel may strike nuclear facilities, this publication says that the us made it clear that support israel's response, but believe that it should be balanced, again it's a question of, the key phrase, balanced, balanced, the question is, to what extent does israel care what the us thinks, or on the other hand, does the us really. think this or is this just a good face for a bad game? well, plus against the background of this attack, strike and so on, of course it was reported that biden ordered - military forces in the us to shoot down missiles aimed at israel, it seems that even american ships shot down something, who as they say, now they will count what they shot down there, what they didn’t shoot down, but the fact that this is being stated is also indicative, the main question is, is this part of the american-israeli, american-israeli plan. or is this now an american-israeli plan, because israel has arranged everything in such a way that the americans have nowhere to go? you know, everything was already said

this summer at the aspen forum, i was interested, i was thinking here, somewhere i saw, there were materials, i need to dig around and look about iran, about israel, about these conflicts, i remembered the aspen forum, an interesting thing, it turns out that it was not only at this forum that it was said that in order for iran to develop nuclear weapons, it now takes months, perhaps a month and a half, this... was stated at the forum, other things were said there, and certain areas of responsibility of israel, when israel together with the united states of america, for example, goes to gaza, is this still whose major operation, american or israeli, israeli, if the events of the war in lebanon are repeated, whose operation is this, honestly american or a joint operation, no, no, no, it is an israeli operation - these are the things that are their historical defenses, and now attention, and if the response comes from iran, whose problem is it, here the problem ceases to be the problem of israel in its pure form, it is the problem

of the united states of america, the words of andrei frantich, who said that they pulled iran to this retaliatory strike, so that it would already be in accordance with this concept, i wonder, then, how did the media call yesterday's strike, a goal of prestige, but they have not forgotten anything, after all, the ball is scored in any case, no matter what you call it, here the question is how everyone looks at the ball, someone needs to see the ball, so that several blocks of tel aviv are demolished, and well , everything in the style of israel, so that it is done, and like, if this is not, no, no, no, no, the thing is that these hollywood beauties, they will now hit the democratic party very hard, exactly, we understand perfectly well that today any beauties, dead residents, murdered children, this is in any case, beauties in quotation marks, naturally, you say, because then they will cut them out and say, look at the bloodthirsty one.

such an old party, it always stands on the side of not just israel, but hyper-protection. it was the republican senators who stood behind today's sending of a fairly large military contingent to the persian gulf, the red sea, the mediterranean sea. today , the united states of america has 11 flotillas. flotillas, i remind you, when trump decided to wag his finger at north korea, he was clearly told that three flotillas must be brought in within 2 weeks to carry out at least 5,000 sorties of aircraft, that's a lot, and yes, the military told him, and at least 3,500 missile strikes to demolish and clear the territory, and there is other data, and how many american regular troops are now in the persian gulf, the red sea and the mediterranean sea, including the sailors who provide them , about 42,000, yeah, and how many are in

the american base - regular. in south korea, well, about 42-46 thousand, well, they roughly understand what they are holding, but one problem: the united states of america, they are ready to exchange blows, never, i agree, without crossing the line of a ground operation, the coalition, they really need to make sure that any responsibility, it is blurred, the americans are used to this, it is necessary to blur the responsibility, we struck a blow, we were struck, further, further do not forget about china, china is the largest player. in the iranian market. iran is a key ally, selling oil to china. a lot of programs in china depend on iranian oil. china will simply watch watch as his economic wings are clipped? no, it won't. well, what you just said is for me just another ball in favor of andrey's version that the americans, as if

creating problems for iran, are still creating. iran, for example, and if it hits iran's oil-producing sector, then not only china will suffer, not only chinese industry, and we understand perfectly well that on the eve of the elections this will lead to an instantaneous, momentary surge in oil prices will be... filling up his car every day, he curses the government, this normal, this is normal, expensive gasoline, what americans usually talk about when they put their card, this is also a bill that they do not pay for the food basket, and

their food basket also depends on this, then... and then now this month we need to hold out in a certain grip of america, we need to spend this month creating a coalition, this month we need to hold off from any harsh manifestations of aggression on both sides. i say again that it is even possible that there will be strikes on engineering structures, but this will not be strike on the nuclear program. and yes, another version: today the democrats are not homogeneous. a huge camp inside the democrats today in america, they want in every way to offer a peace plan to iran, they want to go to the negotiations that were in 2015, to play on the counter-move, we are ready to offer you, and remember the words, this is what abbas was talking about, that the iranians are doing what they are doing, still understanding that in the us there is not only a party of unconditional support for israel. absolutely right, here there is also a party that understands perfectly well that

if they bet on a new iran, and what does a new iran mean? i came, it was interesting, the new iran is today's iranian citizens under 35 years of age, these are the ones they would like to bet on, this is the majority, this is the majority, absolutely right, this is the majority that lives under sanctions, was born under sanctions, they want to make them an offer they could not refuse, but today is not the best time for this offer, we remember the americans, you can lift the sanctions, we can, tomorrow we can introduce them again, who is the guarantor that you will fulfill your program, the americans can keep their word at least once, we have seen how any agreements are thrown into the trash in a second, but in the moment they will be able to bargain, because when you are simultaneously the country concluding the agreement, you are also a notary, you are also a judge, you are also a lawyer and the supreme court and the prosecutor, well, as they say, whoever wants will blow off whose head, remember, i told you this very briefly, when a

it was necessary to show that the dead voted for biden, and the lawyer with him. the sheriff, who, he is also a member of the bank, he is also the problems of the whole current world, that there is a lawyer, he is also a judge, he appointed himself as one, while he does not fulfill these duties, but those who walk under him consider themselves, well, so to speak, someone special, here is today's example, which at first simply drove me wild, i think, what is this at all, when i read that

the minister of foreign affairs of israel, mr. kats. secretary general of the united nations, this is a diplomat who announces the secretary general of the united nations, but... suddenly , who knows, he might have problems with his visa, suddenly, the place of work of this very antonio guterres, and antonio guterres somehow, apparently, also thought about this and condemned this morning, this is to the question of when... such a sheriff, here arises, as if those who, who think that they are more equal than others, and this is not only israel, this is also the former ukraine, it is true, that is why it became former, but nevertheless it is still a problem, do not

switch, contemporary, seagull, to tomorrow, you and me, zharty, what's wrong with you, these are mom's things. were once, these are not yours, and you are nobody here, do you hear, you puppy, just try to yelp something against your father, you won't be able to sing so high anymore, it means you needed me, only while i could sing, and now that's it, they threw me out, yes, choir, premiere of a multi-part film, watch after the program time. sheaf productlar group cognac monte chococa product stellar group rom castro product stellor group vodka pichora product

stellar group vodka veda product stellar group what are you doing, don't you recognize me or what? hero appeared, luxurious, tall, slender, fit, smart, he immediately turned out to be, as if he was expected in a movie, good, kind, only proud, from him there is some kind of calm, warmth, this paternal, exactly paternal, so human, you understand everything about us men, but you don’t know one thing, no stardom, everything is very simple, easy, i fell in love with him from the first... point of our communication, well, i’ll tell you, as a friend, he pulled off such a thing, i would be happy here, but i’m afraid, seryoga, i’m really afraid, i said, i’ll do everything possible and impossible, and i will become an actor. for

the eightieth anniversary of alexander mikhailov, i would like to be like him at his age, on saturday on the first. you do not tell me only about men that they fall in love. valentina titova - one of the most beautiful women of the soviet screen, always gave the impression of a socialite, a woman who is surrounded by the care and love of her famous men, but it turns out that the impression is deceptive, men have always been afraid of me, and my husbands had no influence on me, from someone else's husband's wife, move away, like a bass reacted to your pregnancy, disappeared, who accompanied you in the maternity hospital, i don't know, his assistants, everyone pitied me in the maternity hospital, how valentina tetova left vladimir basov and what the director wrote. filed a lawsuit for alimony, why didn't you take the children with you, where, just a mother yakhidno, yes, you want to ask me now, where did i put the money, valentina titova's confession, a cuckoo mother or

a victim of love, can a beautiful woman or actress be happy at all, no one can stand it when a person hunts only for you, knife in hand, exclusive with dmitry borisov, premiere on saturday on channel one. this is not a lie, not a tale, others saw, i saw how they tried to manually turn a stupid tit into a crane so that it would not see the blue distance and not take off from the ground, they roughly ringed the crane and made a note in the journal. hid in the closet, tied the wings of the white bird of my happiness so that it would breathe warm dust and not plot anything, but it was not for nothing that the bird grew stronger in the sky, fools remained

fools, a broken cage, a pile of ashes, and the crane is back in the clouds, for teacher's day, yes we live until monday, on sunday on the first, and you know what? he wrote an essay, well now no one will know, he wrote happiness, it's when you are understood, in the new season on the first, in the city already... there are rumors about this crime, wherever you go, they say everywhere, women are lured into a taxi and shot in the back, i wanted to ask you about your find, this knot seemed very massive, although it was tampered with quite easily, you are worthy of great honor, moles, honor and trust of the reich, remember this, after the war i was looking for a colleague son, was interested in what

the program time will show, we continue to work live, but when i went to commercials, i said that there are separate countries in that very world where there still exists a kind of hegemon who believes that he is both a sheriff and a gang leader, a mafia leader, he is also a lawyer, he is. under this very

hegemon, the sheriff or gang leader, they believe that they can do more than everyone else, and the rest are already kind of tired of this, in general they say that this world should be according to some other laws exist, in fact, in many ways this is the reason for the boundless manifestation of the behavior of the israelis in the middle east, and of course the ukrainian reich in general in many ways... on this fact that since they are under the americans, then well, as if everyone is turning a blind eye, well, to everything that they turned a blind eye to for 10 years after the maidan, and about the strikes on donbass, and about torture, and about the violation of all possible modern rules regarding russians, the russian language, russian culture, and so on, and much more, well, now they proceed from the fact that the owner should allow them, so strikes on our territory, here... it is interesting here that the same campbell,

whom i quoted to you in the previous part of the program about, so, the iranian story, here is what he said, on the one hand, the issue of supplying kiev with long-range missiles, attacks is at the stage of, quote , active discussion, on the one hand, on the other hand, this same person, in this same speech, the us hopes that, quote, in the not -so-distant future, quotes closed.

strikes on your territory, some other the gesture worked out, well, okay, here, on this scale we have, it means, a possible diplomatic settlement, think, what is it? i have already said here more than once that you can’t trust western media, they very often act as psychological operations, these are not media, this is the deputy secretary of state, well , and sometimes their speeches are in the same, it means, context, because at first they say one thing, then change and so on. i will remind you that our military-political leadership said that the decision about the transfer of long-range weapons has already been accepted, everything that is happening now is some kind of framing, until one event, when russia made changes to the doctrine in its use of nuclear weapons, very significantly changing and reducing the possibility of its use, in fact, we issued an ultimatum, a sturmshed missile, a scalp or some other one flies to our territory, be prepared for a strike,

but we seem to have already said about this, now they seem to have thought about it, but there is, but maybe he doesn’t know what, they are looking for new opportunities for in order to give these opportunities. china, north korea, russia and iran, they united, that is, evil, and of these four

countries, three have nuclear weapons, it will not work to make a show of flogging these three countries, you can put pressure economically and so on, they want to teach the world a lesson. they once did this with iraq, then they, and before that they did the same flogging with yugoslavia, demonstratively bombing everything they could, all of europe immediately stopped resisting american expansion, economic, financial political, including, they really need to bomb someone en masse now , having fulfilled a number of their economic tasks, why uranus is suitable for this topic, they have already said, this is logistics for us, and to roll back the nuclear program and so on, can we inflict the same damage on ukraine, is it impossible?

we will give our airspace for the flight of ukrainian drones, that is, all this has already been prepared in advance and we have put a stop signal for now, but we understand perfectly well that the image of victory in ukraine will also be needed sell to american voters, oh, and now the question arises, what is this, what is this image

of victory, where is this image of victory, how will it be made, will reserves in ukraine be directed to it or not, about the image of victory, it ’s very good that you said this, they really are starting to talk and write about it. including those media outlets that you and i categorically do not believe, but nevertheless, when they write about it, it means something, listen to the spectator. even when russia continues to steadily advance in donbass, zelensky and his generals still talk about victory. by zelenskyy and johnson's logic, defeat is anything short of driving russian troops out of all territory since 2014, so ukraine must continue to fight until that is achieved by any means necessary. but a very different narrative is emerging inside ukraine, one that prioritizes peace and security over victory and justice. is zelenskyy simply naive in continuing to insist that ukraine can actually return to its pre-war borders or zelensky, as some of his domestic opponents suggest, is actually creating a narrative of

western betrayal that will allow him to negotiate with russia without losing face. without receiving missiles, planes, and nato membership, zelensky will be able to convincingly claim that... but his allies let him down and he has no choice but to negotiate. note how in this quote, the idea of ​​missiles and strikes on russian territory and the idea of ​​negotiations with russia are also reduced to one thing. campbell, by the way, also in his the speech, it kind of boils down to one thing: here are the missiles, here, that means, russia, and also within the framework of this image of victory, where they say, even when russia continues to advance with nucleons, i am always wondering, within the framework of what he is doing now... to what extent this is coordinated, i don’t understand this, their front in donbass continues to really crack, but they continue to act very actively in the kursk region, either there is some

unreal military secret in this, or this is some kind of agony of madness within the framework of this, including do they want to destroy their entire army there in this kursk region, i think we will find out a little later not... there is much left, because we have entered a period of really serious provocations on the territory of ukraine, which zelensky will do, he understands perfectly well that it is impossible to defeat us now with those forces, means that are on the battlefield, most likely there will not even be enough opportunity to stop our advancement forward, in some local area yes, it is possible to create or stop or even move forward, as happened in the kursk region, because the level of losses there is off the charts, we have to redeploy brigades there, there are no prepared defensive structures, fortifications, they have to maneuver there, being under our constant fpv drone strikes, we know, but nevertheless, they periodically try to conduct offensive actions there, they try, they get in the teeth, a lot of equipment, a lot. i want to raise the bar for a few

months ahead and go over the goal setting, this is what zelensky's goal setting is and his, that is, the well-being of the country and its prosperity, no, this is all a cover for staying in power, by the way, he has a similar position with netanyahu, the war stops, he is immediately tried, put in prison, he is immediately poor, the whole family , so to speak, leaves somewhere, they need to continue as much as possible, what is needed? to do this, it is necessary to provoke european troops to enter the territory of ukraine, only this will allow, as he decides this in the kursk region, i provoke us, perhaps, to some kind of response, for now i don't understand why they are in the kursk region, before this it seemed clear that this was a diversionary maneuver, we were transferring reserves there, it didn't work, now they continue to really drive and drive and drive there, now, and i'll explain why, now it's possible that this is connected with the fact that they have too... tied too much information to the kursk region, there were too many articles about the fact that if no one in

the west knows about uglidar and has never seen this settlement, then the kursk region is visible, so two things had to be done: the kursk region hold on to create some kind of offensive in a new area, in which they will sell as a victory by the end of the month i understood, about kembla has already started talking, by the way, not the only kembla who continues this rhetoric, the same scholz, who was going to call, it seems. they have said many times what the criterion for victory is, and before the elections in the united states of america, a little more than a month, we remember,

last time we talked to you that the fifteenth will be the key, this is the fifteenth, seventeenth of this month, then the rally, well, that is, the weevil show, yes absolutely right, everyone has little time left, because they had to show some result, let me remind you that now the contract that was concluded is being drawn up, an unspoken contract with congressmen, remember when they asked for 61 billion for ukraine, and the administration gave its head: on the cut that they will present a plan how this money will help to win in any case, so the money is not just like that, 61 billion, no matter how it was divided, this is money that congress allocates, and congress signed off on it, now new money is needed, but new money is needed for the american budget, plus, i understand everything about the american budget, i don't understand, here's the plus, here the question of negotiations arises, negotiations are needed exclusively in order to change the position itself in many ways within. politicians of europe, first of all. the fact is that many european politicians now, even being at

meetings on their feet, which took place precisely at the un last week, they said that it is necessary now to somehow feel out the situation of the future, including there twenty seventh year, thirtieth year, how will we live further, because the united states of america has never said that they will somehow help america, the european economy, that they will somehow take on a number of problems. it was clearly said. that if the democrats win, you deal with ukraine yourself, if the republicans win, you deal with it twice as actively, because there will be no more money for you, they understand perfectly well that whoever wins - these are my problems. the united states of america talk about these negotiations, no, we all, all absolutely rumors that are going on about negotiations are coming from europe, here kemble is now saying that in the near future tdn, here i remember that scholz suddenly started talking about it , i think.

well, here scholz, then it was a bit late to start saving it, the same scholz made very good statements, not so long ago, a year ago, he believed

that he was saying, this whole operation, it will last a year at most, then everything will be fine, remember how much money they spent? after the start of this operation they stuffed themselves with money, there was a huge amount of money scattered, here andrey, i support, this subcutaneous fat is ending, here you will hear the number: twenty-seventh year is when it starts very badly, there is not much time left until it, they understand with their heads that he is doing it badly, in your opinion, is it agreed with the americans or is he himself already saving himself who can and like jumping the united states of america has the same problem, if the process of de-dollarization had not begun, if they had not started...

iran, for example, yes, sovereign, independent, with a developed military-industrial complex, well no, what is here, what is here, well here is stubbornness, probably our stubbornness, and you know, the more i watch the development of events in the kursk direction, the more it comes to my mind that we are very stubborn, very persistent, we go to the end, well, i mean russian people, i include myself too. they were just unlucky with the leadership, we were lucky, when the leader is good, then stubbornness turns into heroism and persistence, when someone like comrade zelensky, then stubbornness turns into a race for who will die more stupidly, probably, in their case at the beginning they really had some kind of plan

with the organization on their knees against the background of failures, a failed counteroffensive in general of our very effective, albeit not... nevertheless, nevertheless, his ill-considered actions, actions on emotions, here is a constant, so to speak, constant actions to drive himself into a dead end, which means, they put him in an awkward position, as mr. zelensky is now in an awkward position, that is, they set themselves up, they set themselves up,

they made a mistake, from which it is very, very difficult to get out now, that is, i do not at all i think that now ukrainians can take kursk at the click of a button.

all business partners, do you want me to be your friend, okay, how much money do you need to get you off my family, no money needed, juk, premiere of a tv series, on friday, after the voice of children, it was you who was looking for me, dmitry kipel, yes, well i knew that this would happen someday, for the eightieth anniversary of alexander mikhailov, yoshkin kot, a new hero has appeared, luxurious, tall. slender, fit, smart, when he goes on stage, it's an ovation, and sometimes just a, don't judge and don't you will be judged, my father told me at our first

meeting, at which i, of course, bristled at the wolf cubs, how could you betray your mother, who gave you your whole life, why did you offend your mother, meet my wife ksenia vyacheslavna, there was just a doorbell and a man came with a bag, can you stay, i am so sincerely happy when we get together, i have very beautiful daughters, like any dad, it's early, this is something they've gone too far, of course, what are you saying, what are you saying, don't listen to him, he's a beauty, he sends me poems, which, you know, are really very important there on the front line, well, god will let me live to 90, i will be happy, alexander mikhailov, cinema, love and doves, on saturday on the first. i'm coming, i'm coming, oops, hi, guys, hello, and

boris is home, boris, the hook lives above, they sent something early, very, what, where, when, autumn series of games from october 6, on the first. you are the famous vladimir pozner, something like that, if you want to relax for free, then go to turkey, there in any village you will be a guest who will be fed and watered, for a turk there is no nothing is more important than family, it was and is, 10 it turns out, when my father enters the house, i will stand up and kiss.

25,868 russians arrived, russians established sports life in gallipoli, created 23 football clubs played among themselves, a mixed family lives almost the same as any other family, the west and the east live in this and clash and friendship, what is the main black turk? i think that this is moderation, so to speak, lives according to aristotle, this gives a sense of balance, a new project in ... october 7 on the first, well in

the end of the program, what i, what we all mention one way or another, speaking here on air, speaking about what is happening on the battlefield in the territory of the former ukraine, about how the front is moving, asking questions about what ukrareikh is doing when it burns its a units in kursk, i honestly, the more and the longer the time when i go to the fronts i really see with my own eyes how all this is, well, as if difficult and not easy in real conditions, the more i become even more sovereign than any person who was at war, and even more cautious, given the information war that is going on all the time. and how ingenious our enemy is, so today i wrote in my telegram regarding what is happening on the front in the ugledar area, in particular, that

let's not rush, let 's all remember once again that when our guys raise flags over certain buildings or enemy strongholds in ugledar, it's good and we need to wish them good luck and success in their combat work, but take control of part cities, it's not called taking a city, let's not rush, we'll have everything, but no need to rush, see you tomorrow.

damn, how are you alive, who are you? i'm the one you need.