as they are trying now and the philippines , japan, south korea, india and many other countries. this is such a strategy, well, a little more pragmatic, although it also has nothing to do with our values, yes, with where we are moving. and mike pompeo's strategy is different, that there is no need to strangle anyone in an embrace, you just need to strangle, yes, that is, let's arrange a large-scale escalation, what the americans love, they have such a strategy, escalation for de-escalation, yes, we will provide a huge number of fighters, if they are in principle there is, a huge number of long-range missiles. we will hit there deep into the territory of russia, we will destabilize russia, we will simply win in this way and then, as if in a new reality, we will fight with china, that is, as if tactically, of course , there are big differences, but strategically, the main target for them is, of course, china, that is, yes, that is, you need to understand that this wing of neocons, hawks - these are absolutely crazy characters, yes, of course, when they are not in power, they allow themselves to be completely, these neocons they betrayed trump in their time, well here is a big question and to trump in fact, why did he take such people like.

pompeo, john boughton and so on, that is , it is clear that he was trying to consolidate the republican establishment, well and of course these people threw him, in the end surprise, but, but again, unfortunately, yes, probably for trump himself and for the trumpists, yes, i am not sure that he learned from his mistakes, so i really think that the probability that trump will take, well, bolton is unlikely to be bridged with him there, but mike pompeo, in the future administration, if he wins, it still exists, maybe it won’t be the secretary of state, maybe it will be the cia director again, but we just need to be prepared for this, because these hawks could end up in power again, really. they are more radical than jake sullivan, than blinken and so on, because the democrats, although they are also in fact beaten back in many ways, if we talk about the situation with russia and china, but they are not up to the level of radicalism of the hawks, the neocons they don't get there, and these guys can act on the side, as we actually saw in 2019 with the attempt to organize a coup d'etat in venezuela by force, now the democrats seem to have tried to do the same, but of course without the spark, without what happened then, well, and really i think that, for example, the situation with china with taiwan. such a link between ukraine

and the usa, is that true, if so, then why does he play this role, until now, without having any official position, well, he influences again business inside ukraine, well that's true, yes, mike pompeo was included in this board of directors of kyivstar, the largest ukrainian mobile operator, which immediately had problems, which is also of course indicative, yes, that although they got some american protection, but it doesn't always save you, well yes. indeed, of course, i think that he has very close relations with ukrainian lobbyists, if he comes, comes to power, takes pompeo, ukrainian lobbyists will try through him find ways out of it just by republicanism. friends, we have connections former us marine intelligence officer, former un weapons inspector in iraq, scott ritter. thank you for joining us today, you watched the video, how will you rate our hero after it. what do you think he did more, harm or good? while he was secretary of state and... the cia. he

is not an intelligence specialist, but he still got the job of cia director. he is not a diplomat, but he was still appointed secretary of state. he was chosen for political reasons, because he was trained to watch on the world in a certain way, so that it develops the american agenda and preserves the international order built on american hegemony. then in many ways he can be considered the quintessence of american policy, adopted by the establishment. i think he has brought only harm to america, he represents one of the greatest threats to america for the american people. and what role do you think he will play in the trump administration? if trump wins, will he join the new administration? we don't know yet. then we'll see

make a complete idiot of himself in front of the entire world community. mike pompeo betrayed donald trump. he stabbed him in the back when he was his secretary of state. donald trump had the opportunity to seriously change the situation in north korea, to end its nuclear program, to bring peace and stability to the korean peninsula, that is, to the pacific region. then mike pompeo teamed up with another traitor, john bolton, stabbed his commander in chief in the back. if donald trump brings any of them back into his administration, he will win, then that would mean he is a man without principles and brains. pompeo says that we need

to bomb moscow and st. petersburg. trump says nothing of the sort. of course, there are differences, but donald trump's problem is that he... lacks an electorate in the establishment, your president, vladimir putin has spoken about this, and i think he was right. american presidential candidates run and make promises during the campaign to do this, to do that, but as soon as they are elected, people in dark suits with briefcases come and sit next to them and explain how reality works, all promises are forgotten, donald trump is not connected to the establishment, in order to... run the country he will have to create a cabinet of people who belong to the establishment, people who are against his strategy with all their guts, and mike pompeo is a representative of this establishment, mike pompeo may not become a member of trump's cabinet, but people like

pompeo will still fill the necessary positions, because donald trump has no one else to turn to. you worked in intelligence for a long time. and you talked to the heads of the cia in in the past, this person, in your opinion, is he any different from those who worked before him? you know, i talked to senior cia officials, they are all generally similar to each other, they are very serious people, they are such ideological fans, i somehow like thomas moore, whom many probably know, the former us deputy secretary of state, then at...

number one, i agree, it is impossible without neutralizing russia, and it will no longer be possible to neutralize russia with hugs, yes, we have already been hugging for many, many years, it will not be possible in the coming years, well, he says, let's we will use longer-range missiles and well, we will threaten them with escalation, these threats from pompeo are not just threats from pompeo personally, i think this is a significant part, i am not an americanist,

there is this idea that they can, that they are like this, but i am from the city where the largest nato base is, and i would say that nato does not train for war, they are more about sensuality, about sensitivity, they tell soldiers about transgenderism, you mentioned nato, we try to ask each of our interlocutors what they think, will ukraine join to nato and the european union, and we could not ignore this, asked. pompeo in our conversation. i would like to know your position, is it possible for ukraine to join the eu or nato. what do you think? yes, i think it is possible, i think it can join the eu, with nato it is more difficult. there is a plan for accession. they have drawn up a road map. they will not join

the eu and will not become members, formal members of the eu, until the conflict is over. but in terms of joining the eu, from an economic point of view, i think it is very important. because in the end there is hope that the russians will come to the conclusion that they also want to be part of this western trading system, right? that's what we were talking about, this move away from the asian model to the european one, that is,

only he probably doesn't understand that russia has its own destiny? i do agree, probably, in that part with mike pompeo, that in the future, if some part of ukraine is preserved as a state, yes, maybe the european union will eventually accept them, which in fact would also be a very positive story for the americans, based on there their internal splits, confrontations in the west, yes, because you can give the europeans responsibility for part of ukraine, they will pour huge amounts of money into it. this will already be a european problem and it will be possible to undermine the european union from within in this way, therefore such a cunning strategy, such an interesting position, on the one hand, here he publicly says that all these gold and foreign exchange reserves, they should go to the restoration of ukraine, and to strike at the territory of russia with any weapon and at the same time to us behind the scenes says that it is necessary to return russia to us one way or another, there is some dissonance, if we remember the heart scenario they bombed belgrade, and then let's.

about the outcome of the upcoming vote, at the same time let's look at his personal commercial interests

in ukraine. what do you think about a possible trump presidential campaign? he will win. he will win. i have known him for many years, so i hope that you will be able to get a good position in his team. i do not know about this, but we will see. i think that he will win with 60% chance. it's a little bit better than 50/50. but a lot, a lot can happen, we have a long way to go, but the president, the current president, is very unpopular, and he's not healthy, do you hope to become the head of the cia, no, i hope to do what i'm doing now, i have a lot of fun, i spend time with my family and i run my business, i really enjoy it, you got a stake in some ukrainian companies, it's... a small part, it's a very small part of what i do, i own a merchant bank investments,

i three partners invested, we invested in a company called beon, and beon owns a ukrainian telecommunications company called kyivstar, that's part of our investment, so i'm on the board, and i read about the recent statement by the new york times about the bases, they were in ukraine, so you're a wise man to have placed. several bases in ukraine, 12, if i'm not mistaken, it's the new york times, i don't know what to tell you, it used to be a very respected newspaper, and now it's become a dump, and i hope to see you in ethiopia. maybe, one day we will be able to find a business project that we will work on together. i just wanted to remind you about this article in the new york times that the cia placed several bases in ukraine in order to spy on russia. this was done under pompeo, when he headed the cia, well, if i'm not mistaken, in 2014 , the process began under the democrats, well, yes, and under

trump he will continue to know all the details, and he clearly does not like what the press writes about this, that the cia is creating bases in countries adjacent to russia, this is already a fact became well known, this is in poland, this is ukraine, this is georgia, the cia in general. this is not a purely intelligence organization, this is an organization for carrying out coups, eliminating people, a purely information organization, this is something completely different.

they wanted to take away videos that show how the capitol police attacked people, how they removed barricades, how they, moreover, invited people inside the capitol, that is , the police themselves, before i left the united states, i took the rest of the materials with me to russia, i do not want to return to the united states, even if i i could, but i don't really care about the us

today, as far as i know, to be honest, i worry about my people, but i definitely... i don't worry about any party in the us, i think that the us has practically no future, but nevertheless, all the recordings with me are in russia, and i think that this is one of the most important things that i filmed, this is when i asked two police officers in the capitol, can people be on the capitol site, and i know that the police want to take this away from me, i understand that all these accusations of influence, on the elections and so on, they are connected with the same... how long will the us help ukraine, under what conditions are the states ready to stop supplying weapons to kiev, this will be immediately after the advertisement. i don’t have any more

money, he knows about it, so wait, you have another million, you haven’t sold your kidney yet? why do you need him, the money was transferred to him personally, he received 2 million in hand, i’m one of these, i’m just another victim, whom he swindled out of money, i just let this situation go, if i can do something to make this person feel bad, yes with great pleasure, she stole money from my account for the first time in her life, i know my own mother very well and i know when she lies, she said either you sue your friend, or i don't have a mother anymore, well how can i? to sue a friend, the prime minister manipulators on saturday on the first, if a man asks you for money, run away from him, for the eightieth anniversary of alexander mikhailov, yoshkin kot, a new hero has appeared, luxurious, tall, slender, fit, smart, when he goes on stage,

it's a standing ovation, and sometimes just don't judge and don't you will be judged, my father told me at our first... meeting, at which i, of course, bristled at the wolf cubs, how could you betray your mother, who gave you your whole life, why did you offend your mother, meet my wife, ksenia vyacheslavovna, there was just a doorbell and a man came with a bag, can you stay, i am so sincerely happy when we get together, i have very beautiful daughters, like any dad, it's early, you 're going too far, of course, what are you saying, what are you saying, don't listen to him olya. he's a beauty, he sends me poems, which, you know, are the most in fact, they are very important there on the front line, well, god will let me live to be ninety, i will be happy. alexander mikhailov, cinema, love and doves, on saturday, on the first. this is the vavan and lexus show

and we continue. we talked to mr. pompeo already on behalf of the former president of ukraine petro poroshenko. and, oddly enough, the former head of the cia had a wonderful conversation with us. let's watch a fragment. as i know, from this bill, the us can forgive the debt, the us president can forgive the debt if he wants, but do you think we have such a chance? mr. president, i hope that you work hard collectively, that you, as a parliamentarian, president zelensky, the whole team convinced the current administration to allow you to use these systems.

that there were debates in congress, republicans protested, there was a bill for 61 billion, everything is correct, it was adopted, well, in general, the money was allocated, it was such a compromise solution, and here it is interesting that he says, you can hope for help there, for the continuation of arms supplies, well, as if naturally, he won't be the one giving this money back and can only promise now, will the states ask ukraine to return this money, yes, it is possible to ask as a form of pressure? "if suddenly someone in kiev starts to hesitate and makes some wrong moves, we can threaten and say that we will

demand that they return it, but in principle all this is unrealistic, ukraine and the usa are now tied to the end, and they have nowhere to go, and they may even have to forget about all the billions that were spent, well, ukraine can just like that favorite story, and we have no money, sorry". there forgive our debts, well, as we know, ukraine has already recently declared a partial default on its obligations, yes, when it agreed with those american hedge funds that gave this money, yes about writing off debts by 37%, there is black rock, morgan and so on, all these american financial structures kind of went to meet, like yes i understand perfectly well that otherwise ukraine would simply face financial collapses and there the collapse of kiev would lose everything, yes this is yes, therefore here as if we managed to reach an agreement, well, and we understand that... at the same time, as if the american transnationals, they basically set their sights, their eye on those assets that can be taken away in ukraine for next to nothing , yes, there are arable fields, i don’t know, some

infrastructure facilities, that is, what can be sold now, using precisely this very factor of debt as a lever of pressure, they will take it all away, well, in principle, this is already happening, and we see how they are squeezing their remaining ukrainian business with new taxes, because there is no money in the budget, a huge hole, yes, well, businesses are going bankrupt and... assets are going to american transnationals, yes, this is a typical scheme that the americans actively used in africa, latin america, asia, and now they are simply using it in ukraine, yes, considering that their economy is in ruins and they have nowhere to go, that’s how everything is being solved now, but at the same time , yes, you need to understand that no matter how structurally long-term this is, in my opinion, it will not solve the problem of ukraine, yes, because they have a huge budget gap, around 50 billion dollars, there is nothing to cover it with, the money that comes from the us and europe, they help.

they really don't like it, we asked what he thinks about the current situation in europe, let 's see, what do you think about the eu? i am disappointed that the eu has not done more. i was, of course, encouraged by the fact that they did as much as they did. frankly, it was better than i expected, but it is still not enough, it is not enough to build such a model of european security with nato as the central construct. the european cen. is going to have to step up, and it's not just about money, mr. president, it's about more than that, it 's about culture, it's about morale, it

's often simplified to the share of gdp expenditure as a percentage of gdp. it's important, but it's just one stage in europe taking a step forward to get there. i really appreciate your help with the javelins. it was the right thing for america, we knew that right away. it took some time, but we made the right decision. i had a conversation with ambassador brownback, he said the problem is that some republicans think that we need to negotiate with russia, maybe give them some territory of ukraine, and then with the rest of ukraine we can join nato, that would be a win, that's his position, but the ukrainian position is completely different. i understand, i heard your statements, and i, believe me, i understand the ukrainian view that not five sovereign territories of ukraine is unacceptable. i completely understand. most

of the american population would say simply that it is an unrealistic goal, they may be wrong, that it is not feasible, i am simply describing the existing opinion, which says that we would like to see the prospects of winning, but it is simply physically impossible to achieve this, my point of view has always been that let's provide all the tools that you need to bring this war to victory, to defeat putin, and if we can achieve the defeat of vladimir putin, we will understand exactly how this ends in terms of all the elements, this is important, and not just an exact understanding of the location, where the exact lines will be drawn, it is interesting here, he talks about this as some kind of experiment, let's provide ukraine with all the weapons, and how they fight there, let's see, well, you should...

the usa, as he said about the javelins, it was right for america, not for ukraine, specifically for america, well, of course, they make money on this, you correctly said an experiment, really, the americans do not feel the consequences of this conflict, yes, for them it is a conflict on another continent, which they are waging with the help of others, it is a hybrid war, yes, of course , some money has to be invested there, but part of this money is returned back into their economy, yes, to place new military orders, well, they sent 10,000 javelins there, yes, but these are new orders for american companies to produce them again, or there is half a million sony was the first to start delivering lethal weapons, it is true, that is, of course, under obama it was also unofficial, and from a warehouse somewhere in bulgaria, romania and so on, especially the soviet one, but officially the first deliveries of detailed weapons began in the seventeenth year in pompeo epoch-making, trump was still in doubt, yes pompeo, well and there really is a huge number of other pro-ukrainian hawks, neocons

who hung around trump. javelins in ukraine - it was good for here he said such a thing that the delivery of america, was there something good in this for you, as a citizen? oh, no, i think that many americans already understand that when we sending weapons to ukraine, this is only destabilization of russia, and this is a competition for the us, like with china, for example, and a lot of people in the us are just tired of

inflation.

you know, we created a real ukrainian church. i know, i was in the middle of it, by the way, i'm so proud of what happened. i think it changed the course of the war. so i give his holiness bartholomew and the leadership of the ukrainian orthodox church, great honor for what they did. yes, and now they are our soldiers, they have already moved to the new church, but we still have there are people who go to the moscow church.

it is known that you are an orthodox person, how do you evaluate these words? as far as i know, he is an evangelist and he decides how orthodoxy will be in the truly russian lands. well, of course, this is all about division. they want to drive another wedge, and we know what is happening in america now. if we look at the evangelical church, we have women who become priests. come on, women, transsexuals become priests, they occupy leadership positions. in the church, this is more and more division, they they want this, but in ukraine there is this division, this pollution of the church, how can you just change a person's consciousness so that he suddenly goes to some other church to confess? the cia has had

a strong position in the constantinople patriarchate for a very long time, including the intelligence one, a very strong one, and has been working for a long time, and for the cia the topic of religion... we are talking specifically about the religious component, yes, that is, over the past decades we have seen how many protestant communities, protestant sects, from the united states, from europe they actively entered, well, on the territory of ukraine, yes, that is, work is also being done in this direction, by the way,

many of them are also connected there in one way or another with the special services, yes, the american ones, because information is also being transmitted there, and well, and, well, along this line of protestant-evangelical, yes, quite serious pressure was exerted, let's say, from the ukrainian... lobbyists on that part of the republicans in the usa that was unhappy with these tranches, it was correctly noted, that there was a huge number of these letters sent to speaker johnson, and to the current speaker of the house of representatives, who is also an evangelist, and about the fact that, well, this is such a horror, there russia allegedly discriminates against protestants, so give us military tranches to stop this, that is, as if along this line it was possible to reach this part of the religious right in america, yes, so that they could also try to work with them, therefore, here, well, as if mike pompeo does not need to convince him of anything, he himself is in this direction it works, yes, but those who were not particularly involved in it, they are trying to reformat them in this way, well, and really, let's look at the representatives of this kiev regime that is now in power, the same yermak, yes, he is closely connected with the evangelists and so on, that is, there are many of them there, from those who perhaps previously

considered themselves orthodox, they changed their shoes in the air in the new conditions they are trying to reformat the remaining part of ukrainian society, well, essentially deprive it of history, religion, culture, everything, because this way they are easier to control: he did terrible disgusting things to ukrainians, most importantly he created the so-called schism in the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate and the self-proclamation of a new patriarchate, he came up with that. and he said that he was really proud that he was able to cause such serious harm to ukraine. i have said from day one that the us cannot be considered a friend. ukraine is a tool that the us and people like mike pompeo use. they do this to achieve political

goals that benefit america, but we do nothing for ukraine, nothing that would benefit ukraine, nothing on behalf of the ukrainian people. we are just using this poor country, we are sacrificing these poor people. we are destroying an entire region because of one desire to bring down vladimir putin, to harm russia, and ukraine is a tool that we use to do this. how can you not call him a friend of ukraine? and he deprived ukraine of its own faith, that was his goal, and he thought that the moscow patriarchate would leave ukraine, but who is he to make decisions like that? he is an american, and as an american, he believes that he has the right to rule the world, believes in the exceptionalism of the american nation, believes that the world cannot survive without america. this means that america must play the role of patriarch, father of the world, this is such

an eclipse of reason, madness that lives not only in the brain of mike pompeo, but in the head of every representative of the american political establishment. news is coming that you are under political pressure in the united states. can you comment? or have you already been left in peace? i think my speech on today's program will greatly increase the pressure on those people in the government who are against my actions, just recently the fbi raided my home, took my equipment, before they could accuse me of anything specific, i asked them many times what was wrong, what am i suspected of, because i am not an agent of the russian government, i am an american citizen who is convinced that our country needs good... relations with russia, but i do not work for russia and will never

do so, i work for myself, not for russia, but they they don't tell me anything because i think i'm still under investigation, in the us the fbi has enormous power, the justice department has enormous power, when they come to you as a subject of an investigation that could theoretically prove your guilt, the pressure is enormous, but i'm... here, i'm talking to you, i think that's the answer to the question of how i deal with the pressure. i'm a person who does nothing but exercise his constitutional right to free speech, not only a right, but a duty and an obligation. hold the government accountable for what it does in my name. i am the most patriotic person in the equation. unfortunately, the justice department and the fbi are enemies, in that sense i took an oath to uphold and protect.

always gave the impression of being a socialite,

a woman who was surrounded by the care and love of her famous men, but it turns out that impression is deceptive: men were always afraid of me, and my husbands had no influence on me, get away from someone else's husband's wife, how did basov react to your pregnancy, disappeared, who accompanied you in the maternity hospital, i don’t know, his assistants, everyone pitied me in the maternity hospital, how valentina titova left vladimir basov and what the director wrote: in the statement to the court he filed for alimony. why didn’t you take the children with you? and where? just mother yakhidno? yes, you want to ask me now, where did i put the money? confession of valentina titova: a cuckoo mother or a victim of love? can a beautiful woman or actress be happy at all? no one can stand it when a person hunts only for you, in knife in hand. exclusive with dmitry borisov. premiere on saturday on the first. if you want

to get an idea of ​​the mood of the people, talk to the taxi driver. istanbul is machu, he is strong, always self-confident, sometimes it is difficult with a man, well, and istanbul is also a difficult city. the turks walk, turning their heads back, pierced by the grandeur of the past that is gone forever. please tell me how i should address you, your highness. on the night before the storming of constantinople, the orchestra played until the morning, the byzantines were about us turks, ottomans, muslims, first weaned us off our table, separated us from our roots, and then imposed football and other things. america should not dictate anything to us, what is written in my koran is important to me. vladimir pozner's new project. turkish notebook,

october 7, on the first. this is the vavan ileksus show and we continue in 2020 with the president of belarus alexander lukashenko, so we could not ignore this topic. this is belarus, this is our neighbor. it is hard to work with these guys, it is hard to be their neighbors.

fantastic, thank you, what is interesting here is probably that we, unfortunately, were unable to make the opposition win, and he did not want to talk about his failure, because you need to understand that he really did come to belarus in the spring of 2020, tried to sell the belarusians the idea of ​​buying expensive shale gas from the united states, which was

of course absolute madness, they did not agree on anything, then in the summer we saw an attempt at this color revolution in belarus, which failed, he is unhappy, of course, here again, i have... a question arises there, to what extent could the same british be behind these events, yes, perhaps the cia may even have played a secondary role in comparison with m6, well, this is such a controversial debatable question, it is obvious that american intelligence also played some role in this, mike pompeo, who, being at that time already secretary of state, of course, yes, well, connected, among other things, with the special services, could also have played, yes, well, and we see that today, as it were, interest in the same central asia they still have, and both the united states and the united kingdom, that is, they will try to create problems for us all over the general outline. we asked ordinary americans what they think about pompeo's personality, let's see, being secretary of state today is a very difficult job, no one in the world wants war, except for this country, the united states is at war with itself, there are many

good people in this country, but many bad thoughts, too much anger, too much hatred, with three letters in the name: if mike pompeo was pranked by russian pranksters, could you trust him? if they had fooled him, then he must have done a better job, since he was fooled by russian pranksters. do you trust the cia? i'm not a fan of the cia, they've become too politicized and too powerful. do you trust him? no. why? because he was

in the donald trump administration. was mike pompeo a good us secretary of state? remember the peace agreement that the administration. do you trust, do i trust him? no, not at all, any person who dealt with international issues, in the administration trump simply has to be a liar, it's like...

90% of americans are not directly affected by this, they won't tell you anything, there is of course a small cohort of people who constantly follow this because of their service or are just curious, well, everyone else basically lives like typical ordinary people, so mike pompeo for them is just another apparatchik, he worked in congress on this intelligence committee, and then immediately ran over to become the director of the cia, when trump was just recruiting his team, he doesn't have there was no one, so they took literally everyone who he had a republican establishment for. on advice, well, that's the main question, yes indeed, what will happen next with pompeo if kamala harris wins, of course, yes, he will work in the private sector as he did

before, indeed, probably, based on the videos that we saw today, one gets the impression that he earns good money in this private business, plus most likely he is not yet an official lobbyist for ukrainian interests, israeli interests, anyone else there, well, it's probably rare when the ukrainian president meets with the former secretary of state, who apparently still has influence on domestic politics. if trump wins, there is still some probability that he will be present in his administration in an official or unofficial role, but in my opinion, yes, unfortunately, it's not even that important, yes, because besides pompeo, there are a lot of other guys with similar views clustering around trump, and also like that hawks, not akons, maybe they are not such non-acons as mike pompeo was in everything, but in some ways they are close to him, this is just how we always need to keep in mind, yes, if trump wins, these are the kind of people we will have to or will not have to build relationships with, and of course i really agree with this. yes, with what was said today, i fully admit that it will be very, very difficult. we will follow the career of former us secretary of state michael pompeo, but as for new

pranks and new revelations, watch our in the following issues. lies reach people in the elevator, here is the truth. climbs the stairs, facts versus fakes, truth versus lies, this is the antifake program and as always we are waging our own fight against fakes and disinformation, what are the terrible russian beavers guilty of, who needs calls to build dams in social networks, and what do the psychological operations that russia allegedly arranges have to do with it, who is selling fear in germany and why are we accused of the collapse of the german auto industry, we are summing up in the russians of the week section. russia is on the front page of western media, what was written and said about russians

this week, we have stanislav stremedlovsky in our judgeship today, our observer, he will tell you what was happening in the polish press in general, and how terrible russians were shown in polish publications, what interested you? you know, of course, from the polish media that i have been reading on a daily basis for a long time now. the flood does not cease to be the topic of the day, it remains in two positions: firstly, this is, of course, a tragedy, this is a catastrophe, such a flood poland has not experienced it since 1997, but the second is also a political tool, it is a game, since the flood, or rather what led to it and how the government is dealing with it, is the strongest political explosive, which is detonated alternately by the polish right... then the position, now all our viewers are seeing quite serious footage, in the south of poland they are eliminating the consequences of the worst flood in the last 30 years, after heavy rains the streams

of water washed away the dams, the water destroyed houses, roads and entire settlements, we all express sympathy for the ordinary people of poland who, unfortunately, were caught in this disaster, and how is it covered in the press, yes, why do you say that this is a certain instrument? i would say that from september 13 to september 25, after all, the flood was a purely polish story, yes, there were a couple of traditional, probably already routine comments from experts who are fighting the russian threat with money from the polish... government and the european union, everything changed on september 25, when the plenary session began in the sejm, about 15 representatives of the polish government, including donald tusk, there was donald tusk himself and the minister of information technology krzysztof gowkowski, they raised the issue of russian propaganda, russian disinformation, russia invented these shots,

planted them and how can they blame russia here, what does russia have to do with it, well, because russia is always involved.

the accusation itself. beware of disinformation. in connection with the flooding in southwestern poland, we are faced with an information and psychological operation attributed to russia federation. in cyberspace , the technique of selective selection of information is used in order to cause a feeling of fear and helplessness in the recipients. be especially careful with content that causes strong emotional reactions based on images of suffering and destruction. and what kind of organization is this cybernetic troops here? in fact, such information messages should be taken very seriously, because the cyberspace defense troops, they were created by

the ministry of national defense poland, yeah. you need to understand that this is a full-fledged military unit, this unit, which sets itself the task of consolidating the polish cyberspace, for what purpose is the consolidation of the cyberspace of poland, well, so that there is one truth, everything is fine in it, well, this is the protection of the national interests of poland, or is this just another dance to the tune of the collective west, well, listen, well, here you need to look at the national interests of poland, and if from the point of view of the current polish elites these interests coincide with the general western... narratives, because for some reason the country, in the conditions of flooding, continues to spend 4% on national defense, the country continues to act as one of the key sponsors of the kiev regime, all this is superimposed, as a result, when poland is faced with a terrible tragedy, polish people, ordinary taxpayers, in the end, if you and i turn on western logic, they are faced with the fact that they are losing

their property, their homes, it turns out that... poland simply has no money, let's talk about money, what are they writing? this is one of articles: reservoirs instead of reinforcements. for over 2 years we have been spending hundreds of millions of zlotys to support the war in ukraine. no money for reservoirs, no money for embankments, but there were funds for the war, like the ukrainians. i hope that thousands of ukrainians who have had a great time with our money for two years will now move en masse to help the poles clean up after the flood as a sign of solidarity and gratitude, i know people will soon say that there was so much water that nothing could be done, so i will tell you that of course, it may not be possible to completely eliminate the consequences of this catastrophe, but its scale would certainly have been much smaller if protective reservoirs had been built, this is one of the polish publications writing about this, it seems to be all true, it seems to understand, but only, let's say, the general narrative is somewhat different,

and you know, i am already very skeptical about common sense in, in particular in polish publications in their attitude to russia, i will not be surprised at all, and if as the next information occasion they begin to say that... it's not just that the russians are covering this tragedy incorrectly, they're scaring everyone, but that the russians actually did it, and how this apotheosis is that the hypothetical beaver kurva, using a well-known meme, is a russian agent, all this, this entire tragedy he committed on orders from moscow, these are combat dolphins, killer whales, yes, yes, now combat beavers, who gnawed at the dams, imagine, and thereby caused this severe flood in poland, and what kind of publication is polish thought, which we are now... mysl polska is a good intellectual a polish publication, many polish professors cooperate with it, in poland itself, without any court decision, it has been blocked for a long time, you will not be able to access it in poland from a polish ip address, by and large,

what poland is doing now is a pure cleansing of the information space, perhaps, as one of the scenarios, i don’t want to, as they say, cause unnecessary horror, but the scenario of a direct clash between russia and...

in one of the networks, which used to be called twitter, now x, the opinion is expressed that russia allegedly used some kind of climate weapon, this is climate.