we are soviet millionaires, he stood there, excuse me, he addressed the wrong people, that's it, they parted ways with him, like a lot of ships at sea, then they came to the room and turnips, mikhailov, the best scorer of the ussr championships, no one has scored more than him, not even close, 428 goals, and this record can no longer be repeated, of the great trio mikhailov, petrov, kharlamov, today only he remains, a bon vivant and a great hockey player, who goes to... all cska matches when his team plays in his native moscow, well , and he roots for him, as they once rooted for him, he never knew how to blossom, seriously, no, yeah okay, moscow boy, no, no, i was yelling, here mikhailov goes forward, protects the opponent, goes to the goal, anton vernitsky, dmitry vishnevo, yuli zagranichnogo, fyodor yurasov, channel one, that's all, see you there.

andrei bely, unlike balmont, was not only simply talented as a poet, but he was a man for whom poetry was his everything, it was his philosophy, it was his religion, it was his form of life, nina petrovskaya wrote about this, that balmont could be divided, balmont was a man, balmont was a poet, they were in in some sense they were absolutely not the same, it was hard to even believe that this egotistical, self-loving narcissist could write such bright, interesting poems. as for the white one, here, as it seems to me, the situation was a little more complicated or maybe, on the contrary, simpler, because the white poet and the white man were much closer to each other. the white one was a very interesting person, but the white one was unusual. if balmont's attitude to the

same nina petrovskaya to other women was half, well, roughly speaking, consumerist and it is clear what he wanted from her, then in what concerns andrei bely, he perceived her not just as an admirer, not just as a fan, he in some sense perceived her as his student, as his adept, and here the situation in a certain sense turned upside down, now nina rather wanted love. wanted some ordinary human happiness, and bely in general was not ready for this, bely did not strive for this, bely had completely different views on the nature of man, on the nature of human relationships and talent, man and god, a different view of the relationship between a man and a woman, so nina, who turned out to be, well, if i may say so, with all her unusualness and fantasticness, she turned out to be too ordinary for bely, earthly their correspondence, but

in general, people of the silver age loved to write letters, and the pistoliers of the silver age, everything that we know about this, there is the correspondence of blok and bely, the correspondence of rozenov and florentsky, and many other correspondences can be named, so nina petrovskaya and andrei bely too wrote letters to each other, but later nina ivanovna solemnly drowned all these letters in lake saimaa in finland, so if we...

went, andrei bely had his own ideas about life, so he writes her such a long, instructive letter in which he talks about symbolism, talks about theory, talks about some intricate, smart things that might be interesting to a graduate student, a master's student at some university who is writing a dissertation with him, but they were unlikely to be of interest to a curious young girl who simply was. and was ready to give herself to this wonderful poet, one way or another bely at some point simply got tired of her, one can assume that here is her passionarity, she was obviously such a clot not only of beauty charm, but a clot of energy, and energy of the most varied, and femininity was overflowing in her, one can assume that she would have been simply charged with this femininity, like an electric current, when bely was hit by this... current, then in

general, he preferred to withdraw from this plot, and as she subsequently ironically wrote that andrei bely's mother ordered him during holy week.

as if from childhood he decided for himself that he would be the leader of russian symbolism in some sense the leader of russian literature, but it was no accident that bryusov was probably born into a merchant family and all these theoretical ideas of his, all these utopian dreams of his, they often took on a very concrete form, and bryusov, in addition to being a poet, he was a publisher, and he was a very good publisher, and he really published very important - magazines of the symbolism era, in particular the scorpion magazine, which was very difficult to get into, in the new season on the first, stop, if they gave these ads, then why should they read the newspapers themselves, they were looking for something in them, remind me

of the address where the attack on the collectors took place, sovetskaya dom-12, so it turns out that we are still looking for the leader of the gang, who personally has not appeared anywhere. code, new episodes, tomorrow after the program time. during a fight, you should always be calm. valentina titova was the wife of the great vladimir basov, but after 14 years of marriage she left an actor, director, leaving him a son and daughter. at first he decided to divide. i said, volodya, these are not lockers. and it was very surprising that the actress left the director who filmed her in leading roles. i will not. ruin my life because of you. and where did you go? she rented an apartment, when i came, the refrigerator was empty, there was only salt in the jar. how did the children of the great basov assess this situation? and my mother told me at the time that if basov, roughly speaking, did not drink, she would never

have left him in her life, because he was a genius. and with rirberg there were no problems. well, he is a different person, downtrodden, nervous, at that time he was the first operator. world, this man wrote a will for her, he wrote it, cried, then, as she believes, was killed, traces remained, and i found these traces, it was a woman, someone famous, exclusive with dmitry borisov, premiere on saturday on the first. bryusov was very strict about literature in general, he was a real meteor, and he really believed that... service and literature, this is the highest thing that can be in life, this is work, this is not even work, and this is a way of human existence that demands everything from him, therefore to be published by bryusov was such a supreme dream, it was the highest level

of dedication for the young authors of that time, and nina petrovsky's husband, that same sergei sokolov, sergei krechitov, with whom i began our story, he, of course, did not pass these bryusov standards, but the fact that krechitov created his own publishing house, the publishing house was called grif, which began to compete with bryusov's scorpion, this is valeria yakovlevich was very much indignant, no one likes competition, so his attitude to this house to this family was initially, well, at best , wary. or rather even negative, at first he did not pay any attention to nina petrovskaya, bryusov had his own complicated personal life, but when bryusov, who treated bely with a feeling of respect, curiosity and rivalry,

when bryusov learned that nina petrovskaya was rejected by bely, and nina petrovskaya was offended, angry, indignant at bely. woman, because he had been writing a novel for a long time, or rather, was preparing to write a novel, he was composing a novel, and in order to write this novel, he, of course, had to rely on some realities of life, on some destinies, on some facts, and that's how it is, if a house is being built, scaffolding is needed, and he needed these very scaffoldings that will surround the construction of his novel, and one can assume that the fate of nina petrovskaya greatly inspired him as a... creator, as a writer, it was then that he conceived the novel, which later brought him

great fame, and which is still considered one of the best russian novels of the silver age, it has been translated into many languages, prokofiev wrote an opera, and based on this novel, the novel is called the fiery angel, here is the love triangle that lies at the heart of this novel, the action takes place in the middle ages in europe, bruce in general... he really loved history to mix times, to transfer some modern events to the middle ages or vice versa, to summon the spirits of the middle ages from the depths centuries to place them in modern scenery, all this was a very typical thing for the silver age - so accepted, here - bryusov is inspired by this story of nina petrovskaya by andrei bely, as if in a human way... intervenes in it, lives it, and then he needs all this

in order to write a novel, that is, in fact, nina petrovskaya initially appears on bryusov's horizon as, well, if one can put it as a muse of sorts, but a muse not in such a high sense of the word, as it was with pushkin, no, it is more consumer, yes, a more pragmatic attitude towards the person who will inspire him to... create an artistic image, while it should be noted that in general nina petrovskaya was not some kind of fool, it cannot be said that she was just a naive victim, in the hands of all these poetic geniuses of that time who surrounded her, she actually wanted this, she strove for this, she can assume, intuitively feeling that, in fact, if she lacks direct literary talent in order to to create artistic texts, then...

bryusov unexpectedly began to frequent the family of kretchatov sokolov and nina petrovskaya, who were very keen on spiritualistic sessions, this was also a common phenomenon for the silver age, everyone loved to indulge in spiritualism, they called up some spirits, sometimes some very funny hoaxes were arranged, nina petrovskaya later recalled what it meant, when bryusov first came to them for a spiritualistic session, nothing happened and bruce. was very unhappy, bryusov seriously related to this matter, that is, they sat around the table, took each other by the hand,

began to call some spirits there, but the spirits did not want to appear, and bryusov sternly said that apparently someone present here was opposing what was happening and looked sternly at nina petrovskaya, perhaps it was nina herself, then the version arose that nothing was working out because there was a bad house here, somewhere there was some house in the area in the moscow region, in this house, that means...

they also did not work out, because it turned out that in fact there was no knocking, no banging, and no mystical voices in this house, but simply the owner of this house wanted to throw these newlyweds out, they did not suit him there for some reason, and for this he played out this whole thing, here is this fact, when some... serious, tragic, funny, they walked hand in hand, and in life and literature, this is also very typical for the silver age, but the result of all these meetings, all... these visits of bryusov to the house of princess petrovskaya was that they began to correspond, and then they started dating, they fell in love, the most genuine love in every sense of the word, in the fullness of the word, which is actually what nina wanted, later it was a little blackened, i do not vouch for the accuracy of the quote, but

the meaning of it was that she later recalled that bryusov poured her... a tart glass of wine, in which his passion was dissolved, she drank this glass and was poisoned by this glass for 7 years, in the summer of 1905, in that fateful summer for russia, yes, the summer when the first russian revolution was taking place, when so tragically the events of the russo-japanese war unfold, that's when their romance begins, they leave for finland to the lake... saimaa, yes, finland, as we remember, then part of the russian empire, it was there, at bryusov's request, on lake saimaa, that nina petrovskaya drowned andrei bely's letters, and they have such a happy, beautiful, wonderful love, after which they return to moscow, well, in

general, bryusov got everything he wanted to get. basically, reasoning like this a little cynically, nina was no longer his needed, and here she in some sense stepped on the same rake for the second or third time, when these great poets, these great masters, for the love with which she so strove, broke up with her, but she did not manage to break up with bryusov or bryusov did not manage to break up with her as easily and as quickly as balmont or andrei bely managed to do. brusov, like all people of the silver age, they were very attentive to themselves, to their lives, to all the events of their lives, they took care of everything that they related to each day they lived. and so bryusov had something called

the don juan list, in this list he divided all the women who got into the field, and his... attention by ranks, yes, i was in love with this one, and this one was in love with me, i just paid attention to this one and only about one woman he wrote: "i loved her." this woman was nina petrovskaya, that is , finland, lake saimaa, this crazy summer, june 1905, still did not pass without a trace for him, still she launched these roots of hers, she launched them into his heart, and it was not so easy for him to part with her could, she, of course, wanted more, she, of course, wanted a continuation of this love and the passion that flared up there, well, as, probably, in the life of any woman, demanded, probably, she assumed that some other steps would follow, but bryusov himself was no longer ready for these other steps, here

a whole volume of letters has been preserved, it was published not so long ago, fully published. and in our country, and with these letters there is also such a very curious story: when you read this correspondence, then in general a feeling of awkwardness arises, because it is very intimate correspondence, because in this correspondence nina petrovskaya simply really bares, tears the soul in the most direct sense of the word, and this is undoubtedly the best thing she wrote, all her literary, all her human, all her feminine talent, it is in these letters, but it is like...

a prudent person, that means, 10 years after his or her death, well, whoever dies later, this correspondence should be published, to the editorial board, i say, he was a very professional, a real publisher, that means, to the editorial board the board that will be engaged in the publication of these letters should include who, what do you think, nina petrovskaya's first husband, the same one, they later divorced, by the way, yes, and bruce, i say, took her away from her husband, but nevertheless the husband should be on the editorial board, of course, balmont, of course, and andrei bely, yes, all these people must be engaged in, that is, editing there, well, not editing, in any case , to ensure that this correspondence was literate and... published. bryusov could not have imagined that 10 years after his death, and her death, it will already be the thirties in stalin's soviet union, no one

was interested in nina petrovskaya, in general, these letters lay in the archive for a long, long time, only in the two thousandth years they were published, by the way, very well published, with very deep, serious comments, a wonderful introductory article in the publishing house new literary review. if anyone wants to read such a real pistol novel, a tragic novel of incredible intensity, then i highly recommend finding this book, it and awkwardness arises, when you read it, but at the same time you understand that this is really a vivid example, this is what the silver age was, how people lived, how they simply really sacrificed their lives, these letters clearly show these fluctuations from despair to hope, they would break up, then go... reproaches and could not forgive him that this way of life, this kitchen, this cooking,

this playing cards on sundays, what bryusov really loved to do, and what he found rest from all his these poetic flights, this is for they went to paris, then again she showered him with so much importance that he cannot leave his wife and give himself entirely to himself... the character probably too, nina was, of course, furious, she was a very harsh woman, and there is evidence from bryusov, he writes about this to zinaida nikolaevna, gippius, with whom

he was also connected by such very whimsical relations, as all the symbolists with each other. bryosov writes that once in one of the performances, by the way, it was almost chekhov's seagull, well, maybe not seagull, but in any case it was definitely in the moscow art theatre, yes, which is inspired by... chekhov, nina petrovskaya came up to him, took a browning out of her muff and wanted to shoot him, there were several people nearby, as bryusov said, who managed to get ahead of her, snatched this very browning from her, the shot did not take place, but bryusov writes, this browning, it means, appeared a few weeks later in another story, and he did shoot, and bryusov also recalls the lermuntovsky photographer he himself writes that he did not have time to get scared, everything happened. very quickly, but in any case nina petrovskaya was exactly like that: love, death, eros, thanatos, all this was embodied in her fate, but even this could not

induce bryusov to abandon this constant that was in her life, then she began to act on him in other ways , she began to openly cheat on him with a variety of people, and naturally with people from the literary world, and one of her lovers was sergei. he was a young and interesting poet, not of such talent, of course, like white balmont or bryusov, but nevertheless, and such also deserving attention, a creative personality, he was the nephew of mikhail kuzmin, another very large important poet of the silver age, it was with him that nina had an affair, with him nina went to italy , later auslander also wrote some kind of fiction about this and... nina wrote some stories, that is, this is also very characteristic, here they live, everything that they live immediately into literature, and such an impression that they lived, and about this khodosevich wrote not just to

live, but so that what they lived through would be like people taking selfies today, yes, here he went, they took selfies in about the same way, all of this went into literature, but another thing is that someone managed to connect it, someone managed not to disappear, not to vanish, but for nina petrovskaya, unfortunately... all these experiments on her own destiny that she carried out, they did not pass without a trace for her, because gradually her psyche simply began to wear out, she began to not withstand it this frantic tension in which she lived, or rather, i would even say so, she could not give up this tension, she could not simply forget this life, she could not simply meet some normal person, leave these madmen, right? just spit on them and live some kind of human, female fate, which, probably, well, theoretically was possible, but she was not psychologically ready for this at all,

with her began, well... such sad, but in general in human terms understandable things, she became addicted to alcohol. in 1911 , they finally decide to separate once and for all, this is where their letters end, and bryusov insists that nina go to europe, she really does go to germany for treatment, then she moves to italy, she never returned to russia and lived abroad until the end of her days, but the end of her life was very sad, because... in europe , no one needed her, all these experiments, the experiments that she did on herself, did not pass without a trace, she early grew old, her health was spoiled, she could not find the means of subsistence, plus the first world war begins, the revolution begins, in general, she really drags out the most terrible existence, she still has a sick younger sister on her hands, whom she is forced to look after, here is the only such light in

the windows in her life appears: in 1923, when in berlin the publishing house opened the day before, the newspaper opened the day before, which was headed by the writer alexei nikolaevich tolstoy, who invited nina petrovskaya to as a literary collaborator, gave her a job, gave her a salary, and this collaboration really meant a lot to her, but by the way, it also meant a lot to alexei nikolaevich tolstoy, because it was nina petrovskaya who suggested the story of pinocchio to tolstoy. it was she who translated this fairy tale for him, from which he would later write his famous golden key or the adventures of buratino, so already at the same time nina ivanovna should be infinitely grateful, but for her, collaboration with the day before had extremely negative consequences, because the day before there was an openly pro-soviet newspaper, it was made with money from the kremlin, everyone in the emigration understood this perfectly well, it was precisely cooperation with the newspaper the day before

that actually put tolstoy in front of a choice: either you are with us, or you are with them, but the emigration told him no, then he returns to the soviet union, and here his very interesting soviet fate takes shape, she did not follow him to the soviet union, perhaps no one invited her there, and no one there waited and no one needed her, she leaves, returns to paris, where they look at her very askance, precisely because she has tarnished herself, tarnished her reputation, by collaborating with a pro-soviet newspaper, therefore no opportunities to collaborate, to work in the emigrant press exist for her anymore, she actually finds herself in a situation of boycott, in isolation, she writes letters, she asks for help, they give her some crumbs, but it's all already nothing, it's a terrible nothing, it's hopelessness, then her beloved dies in her arms

younger sister, the only one who... connected her with life, and after that life loses its meaning for her completely, in 1928 nina petrovskaya committed suicide in paris, in a poor hotel, and khadosevich soon after that wrote a small epilogue, well, not an epilogue, but an epitaph, an obituary, yes, dedicated, dedicated to her death, where he grieved very much about what... happened to her, grieved about her fate, wrote those very memoirs, the necropolis, and the end of renata, but in some sense one can assume that khatasevich loved her very much, and for her he was a young man, she never took him seriously, but this unspoken, unrequited love of khadosevich, this grief about her female fate, about a man who loved literature so much, loved people of literature so much that

he gave himself up without looking back... now 100 years later to thank her for what she was, for the life she lived, for how she gave herself away, without thinking or judging her, to bow to her, dear friends, it was a podcast of the life of the remarkable, and you and i talked about a truly remarkable woman nina petrovskaya, with you was the writer alexey varlamov.

hello, this is the podcast deception of substances, with you is olesya nosova, editor-in-chief of komsomolskaya pravda, a famous endocrinologist, zukhra pavlova. zukhra, let's talk today about sugar substitutes. tell me, at what point did they start spreading myths about them being harmful, dangerous, and so on, because this is absolutely untrue. let's start with where they came from, why do people have such a craving for sweets, people, probably, like and many living beings, gedai.

so a person almost even say not only not sweet. and moreover to the set of body fat mass, the world health organization recognized the 21st century as the century of obesity, epidemic and obesity, well, in fact it is a pandemic, yes already counted one 1 billion people with obesity, yes not even with excess weight, with obesity, and obesity is a huge amount of excess weight on one person, yes due to adipose tissue and two. on the way to weight gain - this is just the easiest, most slippery and fastest path, and naturally, the idea arose, and

how to replace sugar and its derivatives with something tasty, sweet, but safe, not so high in calories, i think that... people have been racking their brains over this for a long time, for example, fructose, at one time scientists and doctors came up with the idea that for diabetics the safest sweet is everything that is on fructose, and whole shelves of such in stores, waffles on fructose, marmalade on the nagu well it is supposedly natural, it is contained in fruits, and fruits are healthy, yes, the logical chain here is obvious, firstly people are very afraid of it so-called chemistry, if you can eat something natural, then it will always be preferable for most people than some chemical, so fructose has very often led us around by the nose, so to speak, and this has helped to spread the revival of diabetes more than

if without it, because fructose is actually not as simple as it may seem, not even simple at all, not simple at all, well in the middle of the last century, a chemist accidentally, doing a certain job from... researching and producing certain chemical substances, what is called, well, the legend is anyway, licked the pussy, washed his hands badly, badly, yes, suddenly discovered such a sweet taste, so sweet-sweet, that right here, that's what is called better than sugar, that's supposedly where this story began, and then the main place of action of all this was in america, yeah, when the first sugar substitute first appeared, that's where it came to market. with such a slogan, the world will never be the same, now sugar substitutes will help a person not to experience restrictions, and these are restrictions in food, restrictions in food, and this is

direct, so to speak, direction towards eating disorders will help a person not to get fat, yeah, but imagine some texas producing. sugar cane, it's a lot of money, a huge market, suddenly they say to them: we don't need your services anymore, yes, i can imagine what a coup it was, and we know the subsequent events: this very aspartane that appeared, a sugar substitute, a sugar substitute, they started to fool them, that's the word, scientific research appeared that suddenly proved, that aspartame, which somehow... won half the market, and people really grabbed onto this hope, like a life preserver, that it causes cancer, to prove, like that, to prove, yeah, yeah, to prove, supposedly causes, supposedly, yeah, thank you, and naturally,

there was a stir, everyone got scared, everyone who used aspartame started looking for all possible types of disease, especially such formidable ones as cancer, and in the end , after some time, it turned out that, unfortunately, these statements were false, the studies were unreliable, fortunately, fortunately these studies, unfortunately, that... in general it is possible, yes, that such falsification, misleading people, because you understand that there is money behind this, yeah, so, unfortunately, yes, then, as they say, the situation played out, but the aftertaste remained, many people still say, oh, sugar substitutes, god forbid, this is chemistry, what a horror, i'd rather eat honey, for example, yes, we have great respect for bees and honey producers, but... this still a completely unsafe replacement for the

same sugar or some confectionery products, because there is our favorite fructose, well , probably, it is better to eat sugar, no, it is better, of course, not to turn into biorobots and never say anything sweet again, no, for a person it is a very serious source of pleasure and life is certainly difficult yes a lot of stress and banal.

in reasonable quantities, so let's show our viewers a table that is educational, interesting, putting everything in its place. so, the first gradation by origin: natural, which is what most of us strive for, synthetic, they immediately want to... say, for example, let's take erythritol, it's either xylitol or sorbitol, we often come across xylitol sorbitol when we chew gum, it doesn't sound very natural, i must say that sorbitol, and now we'll bring something else natural, and isomalt is especially scary, so these are all substances that are natural, but they are also produced in factories, in plants, just like some saccharin. or sucrolose, all this is produced

by a person, therefore, to say from some raw material, only here is natural raw material, here, yes, and here it is completely synthetic, therefore, in my opinion, even this division, it is a little conditional, everything is produced at the factory, the bees that make honey, yes, they are really natural bees, this is not an illusion, but this honey will still be packed, yes there, that is, it will still somehow go through some. there are always a lot of questions about honey, for example, we constantly publish materials in season on how to distinguish good honey from means just honey, why? because yes, because honey is completely calm, what is called diluted, yes, you can do this, yes, i agree, so, we see that there are a lot of natural sugar substitutes, and fewer synthetic ones, but this is how we indicate, now there is a huge number of synthetic sugar substitutes, their truth.

but in fairly authoritative scientific journals there were publications about the fact that sucrolose is not so safe, the headlines were so bright, that's what is called you can't pass by, yes, but when you carefully read the article itself, then, in general, you come to the conclusion that nothing has changed, nothing is the same as before, you can be a baby and pregnant, yes, we know, we know this trick, right?