"i'm offering you a deal, i'll take back my statement if you leave my wife, my children alone, no, i won't beat you, i don't want to cut your hands." there's a big game on the air, today is one year since october 7, 2023, when hamas launched a terrorist attack on israel. a lot has happened since then, primarily in terms of the loss of life of palestinian civilians in gaza,

and lebanese civilians in beirut, in other parts of lebanon, and of course hezbollah and hamas have also suffered serious losses, but what we don't see yet is that we don't see peace yet, what else do we we do not see any collective work to create security structures, to make any collective decisions, whether in the united nations or any other international diplomatic center. this is the reality of the modern era. but at the same time , new international structures are being created and strengthened. and today, a meeting of the heads of the cis foreign ministries took place in moscow. let's see what major decisions were made. the heads of the mit condemned

attempts at forceful dictatorship in the eurasian space. the heads of the cis mfa declared the inadmissibility of freezing state and private assets. the heads of the cis mfa adopted a statement on the inadmissibility of using unilateral restrictive measures in international relations, and the heads of the mfa called it unacceptable.

always express the position of the state in the international arena, it is very important that the heads of the foreign policy departments, which comes from moscow, secondly, this is still a collective statement, an agreed position means one thing, that in key issues, about which today the west has begun to forget, neglect, and sometimes even just deliberately ignore, in these issues there are countries that find their position, and a consolidated position, o

this means one thing, that the world must understand that only at the negotiating table, with respect for the rights and interests of the state can one or another decision be reached, well, finally, it was said that the cis today is the structure that actually declares its readiness to take responsibility for the interests of not only the countries uniting in within the cis, but also to invite to this cooperation and discussion all those who share these values ​​with these countries. thank you. well, now let's return to the middle east. with us is academician vitaly vyacheslavovich naumkin, scientific director of the institute of higher studies, one of the most authoritative, i would say, not just russian scientific experts, but also a person who has repeatedly taken part in official negotiations, acted as a moderator at very important international meetings, and knows well understands what is happening now. and i am an academician

i don't understand, biden says that the united states is against israel striking at...

those layers of american society, the american elite, who are very afraid of the collapse of the entire oil and gas policy of the united states, the west, and in general complications in the economic sphere of interaction between various countries of the world, it seems to me that what biden is doing, he is declaring, does not quite reflect his sincere position, because the boundless support for israel that remains on the part of biden, the united states, it remains unchanged, in this sense, even the position of such a, so to speak, unstable, i would say, western player, like macron, who nevertheless calls for stopping,

suspending military aid to israel, it looks, well, a little more, so to speak, i would say solid in relation to containing israel, in attempts to keep it from a catastrophic... i don’t understand, here is israel, here is iran, how can israeli planes and missiles reach iran, this can be done through jordan, which is friendly to the united states,

through iraq, which is not entirely friendly to the united states, but is certainly not friendly to israel, if...

there are planes, there are many opportunities, there are proxies, there are groups that support iran and will stand guard over the security of this state, including in iraq and syria and even in some other arab states, and it is still unknown how turkey will react, which remains one of the main players in the region, today and we do not know what its position is, that's all more or less i see, as for turkey's position, it seems to me that this is a big mystery, although

there is anti-israeli rhetoric there too, you know, you are absolutely right that in order to fly and carry out an air strike - this is a traditional, so to speak, measure of influence of israel, if they want to, so to speak, uh, hit someone, militarily. but you are absolutely right that to fly through syria, uh, naturally, there are. meetings of arab countries, including

the persian gulf states, syria, iraq and ardania, which declared their neutrality in relations between iran and israel, excuse me, this is despite the fact that 2/3 of the population of jordan, palestinians, yes, absolutely rightly, they said that they will not let through their territory, so it was not for nothing that they went. but there are few of them, according to the available data, there are only about 100 of them, 90-100, there is no exact data, of course, such a number of missiles, it is possible to cause damage to iran, but to cause serious damage given that...

that negotiations are underway, well, it seems that in an open format, no negotiations are visible yet,

on the contrary, so to speak, they are closed, the doors are slammed, but supposedly there is some backchan, as they say, supposedly there is, i don’t know for sure, i’m sure between whom and whom, between israel and iran through intermediaries, there can’t be a direct one, but there may be some intermediaries, which are the ones we are talking about. perhaps the americans, well, there is no one else besides the americans, in fact, there is such a state in which we are now, it’s called russia, well, it is that state that can do everything, and we know that it can do everything, but here - and if it wants our leadership, if our partners or pseudo-partners want, it doesn't matter who, who in general, probably, is still afraid of such a powerful head-on collision between the same iran...

and iran, and a number of arab states, egypt, and the emirates, and saudi arabia, that is, the gulf state, which in principle. treats iran very well, to put it mildly, but which, of course, are interested in there being no war here, so that there would not be such enormous destruction that we see today in lebanon, that we see even in some areas of the west bank, where it seems, so to speak, there is no such dense hamas presence, and i'm not even talking about the continuation of these terrible barbaric actions of israel in the gaza strip, what is continuing, continues constantly, in moscow many experts like trump,

or at least it seems that... trump is preferable - to kamala harris, i must admit, and i sin, your sins are known, these kinds of instincts, but therefore i must ask you how to respond to trump's latest statement on iran, let's listen, yesterday i listened to biden, as usual he only answers half the question, he is not able to answer the whole question, he was asked: what does he think about iran? should we strike it? and he said: "the main thing is not to strike the nuclear things." so, therefore we should strike? is n't that right? i said that he is wrong, shouldn't we strike there? we need to be fully prepared, when they ask about such things, we need to answer. first strike the nuclear facilities, we will take care of the rest later. is this, excuse me,

the truth, what is not the truth, or is this shocking? here how to feel about this? i feel about this as...

i think you will support me in this, i hope, maybe, he will change something and will not constantly say, as he says now, that it is necessary to strike at nuclear facilities there, and what will he achieve, the united states, israel, if he strikes at iranian nuclear facilities, what will he achieve, who will achieve what, you know, when they talk about striking at iranian nuclear facilities, iran in turn says that it can strike. at a nuclear facility in israel, in israel, unlike iran there are no nuclear power plants, they only have a nuclear center in demona, dimona, yes, but dimona is the sixties, even the end of the fifties, when it was built, i was not there, but i do not think that it is very deep,

here are the iranian facilities, yes, it is easy to bomb bushehr, and even then launch a missile strike on it, because again the question arises, if this is, so to speak, an air strike, as it was in iraq at the time, then you still have to fly, firstly, in addition to, so to speak, the flight, here you also need to refuel on the way, and israeli planes can only refuel americans, israel hasn't had its own tankers until now, well maybe the israelis can give the order to american planes, despite biden's objection, well... iran, as far as i know, firstly, they are scattered throughout the country, iran is not israel, it is a huge territory, plus they are all underground, they are all buried, so you can't just destroy it with a tomahawk, it is

necessary, bunker buster bombs, what the israelis did. the chairman of the foreign affairs committee suggests that the biden administration start provide them to israel, yes, but dmitry, i want to remind you that at one time in 2001, when the united states was obsessed with the strike to destroy al-qaeda. in particular, bin ladon, they were chasing him, he was sitting there in the tora bora mountain range in afghanistan, they used bunker busters and were unable to do anything, because they also have their limits. from there came this high-precision strike with conventional intercontinental ballistic missiles in conventional warheads, which was not implemented, that is, they are not omnipotent in this

plan, destroying iran's nuclear infrastructure is quite a task, let's now talk about russia's warnings to the united states and its nato allies. alexander mikhailovich, i want you to listen. canceled his decree banning negotiations with moscow. washington and its nato allies are providing kiev with political, military and financial support to continue the war. the possibility of allowing the ukrainian armed forces

to use western long-range missiles to strike deep into russia is being discussed. such a game with fire can have dangerous consequences. and especially, as it seemed to me, the firm statement of deputy minister lavrov. they are wrong to think that endless attempts to test our strength will not lead to tough countermeasures, much tougher than what is already being done now, our interests in this situation, the interests of development, the interests of peace in society, the interests of forming, if you like, a fortress wall behind which we will develop without fear of hostile attacks by the us, their groups, yes-men and lackeys, this policy is becoming for us...

as for lavrov's position, i would like to clarify the point here, he pointed out very softly, that it is soft, but at the same time on a tough topic, that in fact for us today there are no

moments that would mislead us, we clearly understand the position of the west, its attitude to the use of ukraine in the interests of the west and therefore the solution of the problem by military, diplomatic means will be on the horizon.

group of states. it has been established that american reconnaissance satellites, starting in march 2024, will significantly stepped up the implementation of high-detail filming of objects in russian territories bordering ukraine. at the same time , the americans paid special attention to monitoring the situation in the kursk and belgorod regions. it was these territories that subsequently became the target for ukrainian missile attacks, drone strikes, and sabotage and reconnaissance groups. available data indicate that western intelligence agencies, primarily the british mi-6, were systematically training ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance groups to organize a provocation against nuclear power plants in russia, in particular the mi-6 and

chief. and on targets deep in russian territory, isn't that right, general? no, dmitry, the fact that they are helping, the fact that they are directly involved in this conflict, as they say, poush - this is already an open secret, and this is not happening yesterday and it did not start today, it started already at the end of twenty -second year, the fact that their satellites are conducting detailed aerial photography of kursk and...

forces the task of creating a buffer zone not only in the kharkov region, but in the sumy region, so to speak, to secure the population of the kursk region and other border regions, you know, i do, and the transition, the preparation of sabotage and reconnaissance groups, this is also no secret, they are preparing them, mainly the british, the americans,

documents were published on this matter, our svr. simply posted the original documents about the centers where they are located and so on. eh, i think that what sergei alekseevich rebkov is talking about is that our reaction will be much harsher than it has been so far. i think that he certainly does not mean nuclear weapons, but - from my point of view, to put the americans in their place. by deactivating their reconnaissance satellites, they reconnaissance all reconnaissance satellites fly low in low orbits, they are quite accessible, we have the means to destroy these satellites, therefore for the americans, of course, this is, as they say, a belli case, well, okay, let them decide, if they want, so to speak, to start a war with us, well, that's their right, but i think it's unlikely that they

will start a war with us because of the loss of a couple of satellites there... in any case in the case when we deactivated their drone, the reaper class over the black sea, they were indignant, they were more indignant, uh, so to speak, they didn't let the reaper in, they let the global hawk in, they scared it off too, they passed the baton to the british, so i think that when the deputy minister of foreign affairs talks about the toughness of our responses, i think... he means exactly the kind of responses that will directly affect the americans and their allies. thank you, we're going to commercial, we'll be back in just a few minutes. russia is welcoming dear guests brics summit 2024.

but united in understanding the truth of justice, dignity and sovereignty of good and evil. do we know everything about our partners, why they are important to us and to each other, why are we together, why brics are the horizons of the future. premiere of the documentary series. film one russia. today, on the first. we are always one step behind. let's get ahead of him, so what? let's

go give up my wife, before we met, i served in the far east, there i met katya, we had a roman, only her name was not kachi, but dasha, peepee! "hello, son-in-law, i mean, calm down, we are from the police. south, the premiere of the multi-part film, on friday, after the voice of the children. south is my son, i am his mother, father and grandmother. every child needs a father, or the truth about the father? on the air". a big game, but in addition to naryshkin's warnings, there are warnings that come directly from western leaders, and a warning, as they say, not in

general, but very specific, so let's listen to information about how nato is going to build up its armed forces. 2022 nato considers russia the most a significant and immediate threat to the security of the allied countries. uvelt has obtained confidential documents from the german ministry of defense, which contain a list of minimum requirements for potential, sent out by an alliance member in the spring of 2024. it provides for an increase in military potential, if in 2021 it was considered sufficient to have 82 combat brigades at its disposal, then in the future this figure should increase to 131, therefore, it is necessary to create another 49 brigades, while it is worth considering that each brigade the bundeswehr consists of 500 servicemen, in order to

properly provide command and support for these troops, the number of combat corps should be increased from six to 15, and divisional headquarters from 24 to 38, the number of available ground air defense units should be increased from 293 to 1,467, that is, by 1,174 units, including such weapons systems as the patriot, the arst slm air defense system, the skyranger short-range and long-range defense systems. the number of helicopter units will also increase from 90 to 104. how reliable is this information, if on... how reliable is this reliable, how do you interpret it? you know, i think that the information is reliable, moreover, here welt also refers to the fact that the initiative for a fairly significant and sharp increase in the combat potential

of the combined armed forces of nato comes from two commanders-in-chief, one american general, commander-in-chief of nato in europe, and the second french admiral, commander-in-chief of the joint forces. nato in transformation is the former combined armed force of nato in the atlantic. what does this mean? firstly, the increase is not about rapid deployment forces, which, so say, here are 300,000, which they made decisions in warsaw, which still, so to speak, have not been created, because to increase them so sharply is also not an easy task for europeans. here we are talking about - increasing the combat potential of nato member countries, because an additional 49 brigades, this needs to be distributed among countries, who will form how many brigades, while i must

say that 5,000 is the maximum number of a nato american brigade , i simply do not know more. a brigade is the main, the main, the main part. a combat unit, on the basis of which divisions and corps are formed, because there is no division of permanent composition, even more so corps, a brigade also, by the way, does not have a permanent composition, the number of battalions depends on the tasks, for me it is interesting where the headquarters of these corps and divisions will be formed, so far one division headquarters has been created in poland, because here is the geographic location, i do not think that all these headquarters and divisions and divisional corps headquarters will be located on the eastern flank, for sure, they will be somehow distributed in the southern direction, in the central direction, during the cold

war this was the main thing, it was central europe. eh, the second significant point for me, well, the strengthening of air defense systems, the number is practically increasing fivefold. we are obviously talking about batteries, when we talk about the patriot, airist units, the americans have already announced this, that they are planning to significantly increase. the supply of patriot air defense systems to europe, and helicopter squadrons, this is also a sign for me that they are preparing specifically for confrontation or war with russia, because before that it was going on in parallel, increasing the number of brigades there, increasing the number of squadrons, that is, the emphasis was on the air force, here the emphasis is already on army aviation, that is, they ... assume that they will conduct combat

operations on the ground, with whom can they conduct combat operations on the ground, only with russia, so i take this very seriously, i believe that this is reliable information, how seriously do you take the message that the first f-16s have entered service with ukraine from holland, you know, dmitry, i discussed this issue before the transfer, you know, i still continue to adhere. from my point of view, that if you want to deliver some weapons systems that should make, well, if not a turning point, then significantly affect the effectiveness of combat operations on your part, you should have not 24 aircraft that the dutch promised to deliver, and by the end of the year they have delivered several, before that there were 10 of them, it seems like they lost one, it is not known who shot it down, two or three were destroyed on the ground on - on... but

still they are not suitable for gaining air superiority, because they are inferior to our 130 and 135 and the thirty-fourth su, including in electronics, including in electronics and in detection range, that is, we mean the onboard radar. in - air-to-air missile weapons, so they can only be used as platforms for - launching air- to-ground missiles, yes, but again i say again that - not the quantities, not the aircraft to seriously compete or those more to imagine a threat, yes serious weapon, i do not argue, our command will need it, i think our command takes this into account. but the countermeasures, i am sure, they have already, have already been developed, how have the f-16s

proven themselves in the middle east? well, the arabs believe that they have proven themselves well, because there is nothing better there, and no matter how they prove themselves, well, what can you do, they proceed from the fact that these deliveries, they are today, well... especially modern, already 200 pieces, thirty-fifths, well, by the way, in addition to the fact that they are thirty fifth, the quantity is also of great importance, the quantity is huge, 200 pieces have already been delivered, 200 pieces, and here, well , it’s a trifle, especially since, well, in general , very few people, as i understand it, are buying the f16 now, no, few, of course, because the f35 is, so to speak, a fifth- generation aircraft, though a bit expensive, frankly speaking.

a bit expensive, besides, practice has shown, if you believe what our iranian partners say, then a lot was destroyed there, well, 35 is unlikely, but now such figures have appeared that it’s about there - on this there were about five or six planes destroyed at the airbase, well, they're not lying on the road, they're not on the road, but multiply by 120, at a minimum 120, and at a maximum it's 300, so multiply 120 even by five, that's already, so vulnerability. there are sixteenths there is a big vulnerability, american bases have vulnerabilities, oil transportation routes have vulnerabilities, all these vulnerabilities, they will work everywhere, they will work, in my opinion, in the ukrainian academic, russia has good relations, relations with iran are strengthening even more, it's quite clear that in moscow does not welcome any strikes on iran, but simply - for our understanding, if

israel had successfully struck iran's oil structures, this would have led to an increase in oil prices, which is favorable for russia, well , of course, in my opinion, this led to an increase in oil prices, but not everything is measured by oil prices, however, there are other more important issues related to our national security. but nevertheless, we want to know where we can be hit with a sack from around the corner, and we also want to know where there is how...

throw dust in the eyes, the deterioration of air quality in the regions of ukraine due to the introduction of dust and smog from the territory of muscovy, as ukrainian fakers accused russia of polluting the air of kiev. smog, firstly, cannot move over such distances in principle.

every person who lives and has lived in kiev knows very well that if this smog is there, all the peat bogs burn. the paratroopers of the armed forces of ukraine, without realizing it, made a mistake, praising. western equipment, this equipment was used by paratroopers and they, after operating the challengers, say that they better than t-80b. a man who positions himself as a military expert, and before that, he positioned himself as an expert on housing and communal services. antifake, season premiere, tomorrow on channel one. during a fight, you always have to be calm. valentina titova was the wife of the great vladimir basov, but after 14 years of marriage, she left the actor and director, leaving him with a son and daughter. at first, he decided to divide, i said, volodya, these are not lockers, and it was very surprising that the actress left the director who filmed her in the leading roles, i won't ruin my life because of you, where did you go, rented an apartment, when i came, the refrigerator was empty, there was only

salt in the jar. how did the children of the great basov assess this situation? my mother told me at the time that if basov, roughly speaking, did not drink. she would never have left him in her life, because he was a genius, there were no problems with rerberg, but he is a different person, downtrodden, nervous, at that time he was the first operator in the world, this man wrote a will for her, he wrote this, cried, then, as she believes, was killed, traces remained, and i found these traces, it was a woman, someone famous, exclusive with dmitry borisov, the prime minister... on saturday on the first. mikhailovich, in the collective west, first of all in the united states, great britain, they are trying in every possible way to convince their population that the dispute with

russia is not only and not so much about the future of ukraine, and not even... only and so much about european security and not even about a new world order, the dispute is about the fact that there is a villainous russian state, populated by a villainous russian people, who on for many centuries has shaken europe and done mischief to europe, which europe, almost genetically... stands and, of course, experiences an inferiority complex about this, so i have a question: will we be able to overcome all this? they will be able to step over all this, but you know, how many times have there been conflicts between large countries, including, let's say, between russia, great britain, and then somehow

they made peace and became allies, so what do you think, this kind of reconciliation, not only military, not only diplomatic, but if you want, mental, is it possible in the foreseeable future? well, i would divide this question into several parts, but what... what you said is very important, the period of history that we are now experiencing, it still has certain limited time frames, if you look at history as a whole, then russia was, is and will be, and as for other countries, well, i do not predict anything bad, but i can tell you this, that probably in politics in diplomacy, well, it would be naive to say the word never, in this case it is only a question of those principles from which we will never refuse or...

in its mental approach, it showed and demonstrated to the world unique opportunities, but in fact, maybe unique for them, natural for us, you remember how our soldiers led during the second second during the great patriotic war, when the manifestation of humanism, despite those victims, despite the horror nightmare that the west brought in the person of germany first of all, but not only it, on the territory of russia all the same we not only forgave, we... stepped over, we were above this, but if we talk about today situation, then all the calls for cross-border relations, they all run into the same thing, our

nationality, we recently heard, this is the correct definition, this is the russian people with their culture, with their religion, with their history, with their traditional values, which are actually dear to the majority of humanity, so i believe that we can come to an agreement, by the way, your program today, what is important, because in all those questions that you raised, again, russia plays a big role, because it is precisely on the example of the conflict with israel and iran that we can show and explain to many and most importantly attract countries to your side to prevent this conflict, they just need to know better, but if you know better the consequences of this conflict, because the consequences of our conflict with the west on the example of ukraine there, well, or using the potential of ukraine, this may still have a negative connotation, many... or the west may not have thought it through, but as for the middle eastern conflict, you can find more allies on this example to show what awaits humanity

with such people who are out of touch with reality politicians, so we will not only continue this policy of reconciliation there and attempts at a solution, but we will also demonstrate a readiness to unite all healthy forces in the fight against this, and russia will live in spite of everything, because behind russia stands not only culture, all the potential that... was accumulated by our ancestors, behind russia stands the truth, here in that film, which we surely immediately remember, what is the power, yes, in the truth, we talk about the truth, it is heard by many, this is what is being told to us today by the lips of there americans or europeans, any politician, he talks about what, about what cannot be acceptable to a normal person, he unites all forces against, well, us there, against other countries, and we say that we want to unite everyone... in the interests of these states, i think that this call will be heard, and russia, having united these healthy forces, will be able to find a solution. thank you,

academician, yes, so very briefly, i join in what alexander mikhailovich said, and i believe that the most dangerous ally of our enemies is the absence unity in our ranks in our ranks in our relations with our partners with our closest friends within the framework of the co... i think that if we overcome those cracks that sometimes appear, it will be very great. thank you, general. yes, i completely agree with vitaly vyacheslavovich that the americans in general are proud of us, our strength is in our allies. unfortunately, we cannot boast of such a thing, that our strength is in our allies, we must strengthen our positions or, perhaps, in the post-soviet space, among the cis countries, in...

with other armed forces and yes, with a different attitude towards the collective west, and as you said, the word never in history is inappropriate, but i think that as they say in the foreseeable future, as you noted, with the presence of those western leaders who exist today, it is very difficult for me to imagine that we could

return to that... russia is hosting dear guests at the brics 2024 summit. the venue is the beautiful kazan. the capital of tatarstan is a crossroads of civilizations. the brics countries are the most dynamic part

of the planet, the heirs of ancient civilizations, centers. of world development, a good half of the people of the earth, very different nations, but united in understanding the truth of justice, dignity and sovereignty, good and evil. do we know everything about our partners, why they are important to us and to each other, why we are together, why brics are the horizons of the future. brics, back then. arose as a virtual reality as an idea. for more than a decade and a half, your humble servant has been heading our delegation at the brics academic forum, the main expert platforms that develop recommendations to heads of state on the further development of the association. and it so happened that the academic forum is older brick. back in 2008, we gathered prominent experts from

russia, china, india, brazil in moscow, where... we tested the idea of ​​​​unifying the four countries, there were many who believed that it was impossible, that we were too different, but the majority believed that we should try, the next academic forum was held in yekaterinburg in 2009, shortly before brick was officially born there in the urals, which with the accession of ur in 2011 turned into brics. more and more countries are striving

to be good neighbors who understand each other well. kazan, the ancient capital of tatarstan, has 70 mosques, is adjacent to forty-five orthodox churches, representatives of 115 nationalities live together peacefully, this

symbolically embodies everything that brics is based on: equality, respectful dialogue between different civilizations, cultures and religions, their mutual penetration, mutual enrichment for the general development of benefit for all. in russia there is a state, a state, a society and a person and in principle, despite the fact that there are still several different interpretations in each of the brics countries, what is more important , collectivism or individualism, nevertheless, within the framework of such a trinity of understanding state sovereignty, public sovereignty of a person within the framework of this state, there is an understanding that it is necessary to respect each other. and respect each other's sovereignty. in kazan, there is the epiphany cathedral, built on the site of the discovery of the kazan icon of the mother of god, and next to it is a mosque. on fridays, throughout the entire district,

the minaret of the mosque sounds the azan, the call of muslims to a common prayer, and on sundays the bells of the epiphany cathedral ring, calling christians to the liturgy. here russia is today a kind of flagship in the fight against... hundreds of ethnic groups have lived together for hundreds of years. i am a lak, i am a dagestan, i am a chechen, an ingush, a russian, a tatar, a jew, a mordvin, an ossetian.

it is simply impossible to list all of the more than 300 national groups, ethnic groups of russia. i think you understand me. but i am proud that i am part of this world, part of a powerful, strong, multinational people russia. this civilizational feature of ours has become the cement for the foundation of brics. the big brics has even greater tasks to solve and greater successes to achieve. the chinese side is ready, together with other partners in brics, including russia, to implement the strategic political knowledge of the big brics, as well as to provide a plan. south to overcome global challenges that have not been issued for 100 years. for many decades, if not centuries, we have been asking ourselves who we are, are we east or

west, are we europe or asia, eurasia or aziopa, here we finally found the answer to this question, we are us. we are a multinational, multi-confessional, great russian civilization, a self-sufficient country, a powerful center of power in the modern world, without involving the heart and motor of brics, for brics, russia, china are dad and mom, that is, we... and i believe that we interact quite effectively, initially all this goes back to pryamakov's idea of ​​the eurasian triangle, russia, india, china.