it's completely ok so in that case we are going to go. unlike other media that there is little regulation restricting what can appear on the social network so the decision to delete or ignore is entirely up to facebook. and it started off in us colleges and then we launched in us high schools and a little bit in us corporations and since when we opened up the site actually last ember of sex. started exploding internationally when i first met zuck he was twenty two years old and from that moment forward for a period of about three years i was one of the people that he turned to for mentoring. venture capitalist roger mcnamee was woman facebook's early investments and a mentor to found among. he was absolutely

convinced that connecting the world was possible and that that should be his mission we believe really deeply that if people are sharing more then the world will be a more open place where people can understand what's going on with the people around them and that's really what we want to get towards i was more proud of facebook than anything i've ever done in a thirty five or six your career. before i understood what was going. there for the group. for. the for. one of the most sensitive areas of facebook's content rulebook is the section on graphic violence just you know a good. look at it it's a feel. for the books. there are three options we have are no more there's no option taken to lease

a room or for facebook our work on the server is restrictions on place of you're going to see the current those policies present us when content is marked as disturbing a warning is added to make the content viewable users must click on this warning under eighteen should not be able to view the com sense but it remains on the site and freely available to anyone claiming to be over eighteen a video or so one guardian is not necessarily going to go to each board they want your markets to buy so right one just could as well let the policy that money stays for the basic birth of a few. critical items to a war i'm going to respond and consider for most of. it's been dissolved the. videos of people who don't do not show but a newbies who just marked resistance of the book and still share those like crazy words from work. so i was part of that max policy this far

weeks this is video it was a short child abuse and it's defined as one of. the repeated it can be easier for sloppy overshadowed by adults or monologue and there are also the conflicting o'berg your call who needs a boy although or the coffee rotation or shooting or if it was too young to start by the wrists i both arms are not. always for one. or. for. you recognizes images and i for one did you know. what video from they are

from. that was actually sent to us from one of all supporters asking for help with a. sunday am in boxes on this facebook page without i am asking for help because they saw that they'd seen and they were you see it was scared they didn't want to call. saw initially you see a little tiny boy it was about two or three on the video with a man talking to him which are not safe. and then he was hit him and punched him it was so him about on the newest stump and kicking on him and then i'll be so the video call saul. l.f. if. absolutely nothing not paul from a sickening feeling not you've just you've seen some autonomy little boy.

i mean you know you start from actually not a day off. not just go to. the noise. you are so he can get out your ass. you say and that's all you think about is a little why a maybe say in that way we say was happening to him and you're full of idiots as. i am i did. and we received. messages back saying it didn't violate their terms and conditions. this is bizarre. wasn't made. no gray area but it is so interesting to the mobster yeah because it's so obvious he's

still technically on. our reporter asks another moderate so why he thinks some graphic content gets mocked is disturbing rather than deleted you know what they're raising is behind please the other uses. for all of this is it's all for the kids which go on and. yeah you know it's all for. the. budgeting it should just be late and like i said. don't assume of censorship them ok if your search zones are intruders you can lose interest but it's all good it's all about going to work. in the first two days after it was posted on facebook the video of the little boy being beaten was shared more than forty four thousand times . from facebook point of view this is essentially. you know the crack cocaine

of their of their products right it's the really extreme really dangerous form of content that. attracts the most highly engaged people on the planet for. facebook understood that it was desirable to have people spend more time on site if you're going to have an advertising based business you need to see the ads he wants his site what facebook has learned is that the people on the extremes of the really valuable. because one person on either extreme can often provoke fifty or one hundred other people and so they will live as much extreme content as they can get . we put the results of our investigation to facebook's vice presidents of global policy. shocking contents does not make us more money is just a misunderstanding of how the system works shocking consensually keeps people on facebook that means it's more likely that they will view advertising that makes you

money that's why shocking content is good for facebook again i don't that's not our experience of the people he's also his around the world there is a minority who are prepared to abuse our systems and other internet platforms to share the most offensive kind of material by just don't agree that that is the experience that most people want and that's not the experience we're trying to deliver. there's no thousand as a couple of photo op means on that page so that with that we have is looking to see if you can find any time gaggle of kev end if. going on for a while with no idea where to go with ace and if you put a facebook knock and saw a scene with their three of his just say to try and find out some information on that video i need to tell you i say. well boss to be dog discovered you can go. over there go get his b.

we drove through the deal but there's nothing all to got to do our policies for life if you're always right your pockets this is the big videos that are not worth i'm not munching on person to people. it's all photos. so you go over the coalition. for gold for more but in order to smoke in. our investigation found that unless they are streamed live videos of physical child abuse and not usually reported to the police. or sold him destination price as a follow up price. and may be. off the mat something in perl and on and on and on child because it will be a story. about dad hearing stuff like. the carpenters are still coming so herschel cards are right or otherwise just far as

we're concerned of course research from around the world. i know it's weird but i spoke to anything i would day possibly on that's if you see something where child is going to read by the supers was a large video and subverts will bite you there is a lot of makeup different carbis i've heard of star trek a video store dangerous. is not going to be reported by off to the police i think the reality is someone is going to it's going to be. most united now about how. hello boys we've found out that this was in malaysia that this child. it was stepfather and been arrested and jailed for twelve months. how long ago was it that you first came to most of the year and that was in i think it was december two thousand and twelve. saw it's being thick yeah it's almost. it's

a video still on facebook yeah. this video is used in facebook's training as an example of the kind of child abuse that should be marked as disturbing and left almost silent. if that's being used as an example for motivators of what is considered acceptable to say what is tolerated on facebook is is is is truly shocking this is just a haitian for why they allow. in or that a possible and occasion a rescue of victims of physical abuse we may not immediately remove this content from facebook it's perfectly possible for facebook to take down footage of child

abuse and for that to be passed to the north or for copies of the tiriel to be retained if that will assist in a law enforcement in a police say investigation it's difficult to conclude why that material would need to stay on the site we know that for as long as that content command on a social media site then that exacerbates the trauma that children might feel not only has that child been subject to sustained physical abuse but unfortunately that child is being. abused by. the fact that content is there for anyone to go into facebook and see unfortunately that child is being the abused with every click. on facebook and individual shared it i want to be clear that that's not acceptable that shouldn't be that material should have been taken down on the site that you went to the c.p.l. site you see part of the total system so those are the front line reviewers but

behind them sits a team of child safety experts facebook full time staff they will make an assessment of whether the child is at risk they will make a decision about what to do with the content including referring it to law enforcement agencies where that's a program. after we made facebook aware of this child abuse video it was still available on the platform they told us they have now reviewed the material used to train new moderators. just this morning just one clarification. so they were just saying basically if i said to me i'm pretty sure they're minors. it's kind of just to echo what. they saw that up at the very mention of a school for. our reporter was moderating a video showing two teenage girls fighting both girls are clearly identifiable and

the video has been shared more than a thousand times. one and definitely more i don't want to. play for the face. of. battered. that she is how she. and i. my friends. and she saw a. bit unfair. i just saw it as a video he tossed she saw the need to say it you say. start to fight. in the one throwing each other on the flaw. the salt and press a car just costs time on my shots i. just repeat a lot nice and kicks in and the had an eye and looks she just walks out of

control basically she looks like a wild animal to wake up and stand behind i what the whole world is watching as well a scene at most a baby you know horrifying it was humiliating for. the video has been posted with a caption condemning the violence based on the new policy yeah that is one of the for the foreseeable future and. really rather you are leaving if it's going to i'm with my mom and everything like everybody condemning is a reason for working both forward over well. over her vocal. following a recent change to the publishing even experienced moderate says i'm not sure whether the video should be deleted almost as disturbing i'm left on the sites where they go to. saw anything on a video recorder and with more interest or less of those condemning books of it's

a good. idea of just one of them optimism out. of them ok. because there's a caption condemning the violence the video gets mugged is disturbing i'm left alone the signs. from. me showed footage from undercover filming to the girl's mother. should really have been a question. boy it's. been a discussion those he said himself about it so. here we have penn. being questioned don't.

you see the images and. it's horrible. the school stood so why was it why was it the school should why was it discussion with its sad. i don't know. you know someone's child. it's not fast spoken. so that's interesting because i i swear if there is like bullying between two humanity you can just delete it i'm sure there were girls if they were if there were three because all of these girls groups for the world to look or want to form your kids' room but you're screwed look for your daughter ok. to be on for over three right i say overdue for if there was a caption saying brilliant she had a country girl in your ochre order that was not appropriate for from the. option is on the radio or. should have been taken down there all the west spread awareness

with a. video we saw one star beamed. but was no emotion oh my god what's happening to that they're not thinking of the bigger picture this is the thinking about the policies if they're watching a video of their own daughter was a decision. if a parent or guardian sees a video of that child in circumstances that they object to they do have the right to insist that we take it down and we do take it down where we're made aware so you're putting the onus on the victim to complain to you why aren't you taking this material down before humiliates children and again if the content is shed in a way that praises or encourages that violence is going to come down but where people highlighting an issue and condemning the issue even if the issue is painful

there are a lot of circumstances where people will say to us look facebook you should not interfere with my ability to highlight a problem that people watch these videos facebook's making money. the money we make is by people using the service and seeing ads within the news feed. when you have forty billion a sales and tens of billions of profit per year pretty much have an obligation to. do everything in your power to make sure that you're not making the world worse for the users of your product.