who are accused of killing protesters in kiev in 2014 the swap near the rebel held city of who leave is part of an agreement between the leaders of ukraine russia germany and france. the yemeni government is blaming who the rebels for a missile attack on a military graduation parade which killed at least 7 people no one has claimed responsibility for the strike in the southern town of the lie the apparent target was the security belt forces were trained in the quip by the united arab emirates they're part of a government allied separatist group in southern yemen. 16 somalis who were badly wounded in a bombing in mogadishu have been airlifted to turkey saturday's attack killed at least 80 people including 2 turkish nationals those are the headlines of news for you in half an hour talk to al-jazeera is next.

that is all you need. to see. china china china china china china china china they want to make a deal. question is do i want to make a deal we've heard u.s. president donald trump talk about china many times. in fact it was he who started the so-called trade war with china you know the 2018 with tariffs piling up on both countries imports that isn't a real war and how much of it is impacting china's massive economy and it's 1400000000 people. santamaria here in the library of the national museum of carter willis trade war between the world's 2 biggest economies have repercussions

far beyond their own shores we're seeking answers today as the president and founder of the center for china and globalization dr wang talks to al-jazeera. dr wang thank you for joining us thank you for talking to al-jazeera i think for 18 months now we have heard the story of the so-called trade war between the united states and china but we hear it mostly through the prism of the united states possibly because donald trump shuts the loudest about it but we certainly haven't heard much of the chinese reaction other than when they put their own tariffs on i'm interested to start by just if you can tell me how has the story for the 18 months played out in china is it is it a big deal there or it certainly is a big do i mean the china on the u.s. relations and this is exactly 40 years overdue. matic ties china opened and the 1978 and on january 1st 979 china u.s.

diplomatic types so chance open up the large and open up to the u.s. and actually for the last 4 decades it has there's a bomb so there's up and downs but not as big as surprised as i expect this one and i remember the present time come to china 2017 in the bamberg he had to talk 150000000000 deal was signed so you see such a high turn 25 even 30 percent of tariff on such a big amount 250000000000 we have a high 500000000000 or whatever it's president so so they certainly made the chinese a confuse and and also you know really troubled president trump will say oh we're winning here we're winning the trade war when in fact a lot of people in america saying no we're not winning actually this is affecting us as us business people is it if we mirror that in china is it having a you know a i don't think there's a there's a lot of economic impact there is there could be some psychological impact people just pop or perhaps you know it was holding from further heavy investing or maybe

rolling back a bit of the employment on that but basically i think both china and the u.s. looking to us the ability and a deal that can be truly beneficial so so i think but they don't see as described in china as present trouble that oh everything's a collapse everything a stock market crash no i mean i mean except that the park price has come up due to the swine flu i mean you don't see any major changes no we don't feel it i mean there could be only the slowing down but but still china keeps maintain the 6.6 percent g.d.p. growth every year adding another australia to it with g.d.p. so so it's one china richard that kind of magnitude and they still keep 6 percent of the over. original basis of year after year that that's incredible i mean so so . naturally you can see china slowing down from

a 6.5 to 6.2 is crashing or is still the best one of the best in the world so i think i have to you know interpret how to interpret that could china have reacted more aggressively itself you know with the there was the $200000000000.00 or tariffs on $200000000000.00 worth of goods at a rate of i think it was 10 percent and china replied with 60000000000 and then again another 200000000000 went on a 25 percent in china again a reaction but the 60000000000. they playing along in their all because the proportionally you know china's important proportion corresponding to us proportion of the import that's where they exercise the tariff of each other but you know china cannot match in absolute numbers with with us because you know china was not really that in line with us in terms of exact the same amount of import of each other you know the thing is that the chinese market already a home market for us you know the reason the u.s.

industry air space aircraft industry and you know high tech industry everybody in china consumer market everything is because china is buying a lot of u.s. crude production and particularly you love the u.s. company is invested in china selling in china so that's not counted as u.s. exports right so it but then they got all the benefit back you know like oh well president trump announced the tax reduction and. said they're going to in a few years ago to repatch it backs $350000000000.00 u.s. dollars so that's incredible that's all the money they made overseas so including china so so you can see but that money probably is not counted as a deficit the trade deficit for the u.s. because china may you know like i performed china made the 50 dollars 100 dollars but it sells 1000 for a $1000.00 but then china may have a balanced. take a $600.00 or $800.00 as if china made all the money off of that so it's not accurately reflect the situation another facet of the trade war was august of this

year when the united states declared china to be a currency manipulator and i think that's an easy phrase to throw around and certainly in the white house has done that maybe you can just explain to us. in simple terms what a currency manipulator is and also does does china fit into that mold is a really you know you have to there is a little there's quite a few quite here and that is where they define terrorism a little later and china is not matching any of those you know china actually didn't really use the flow floating around the $6.00 per us dollar. but that's not you know china did not drastically devalued or do anything to do that so i think it's an accurate assessment of that i think there's 2 labor china as a currency manipulator is not correct so then how. i won't say how does the u.s. get away with that but how are they just interpreting the data differently that's

great i think that's over now us is losing the credibility on that is because even though they said on their own when you match what china is doing is not just china those are today's china the little inflation on that flatter the larger according to the markets which are in that us maybe china is going to they saw that as a as an indicator but then you see now they don't see that anymore so so you see it's . the basically that is decided by the market but chinese government has of course going to let not only allowed you to devalue. you know as as world tell us is the thinking no no not really so the picture i'm getting from years we explained all of this so well to us is that this is a it's it's an economic versus a political story interests of 2 countries. it should be about the economics but actually is it actually more about the politics certainly coming from the american

side it's about. political self-interest and where they want to position themselves against china. i think there's a bit of that and i think you know us was initially when they gauge china they were thinking ok that as we go along we are 2 system we're converging we're who we've become the same you know the china we as the middle class growing there will be more more. universal suffrage and then they were they will have a similar system as us but that's a that's a bit of the expectation i think that you know in. a culture in east asia you know if you choose a society you have a single poor as one party you have a japan i mean even japan is a one party or the time almost so china you know you have to really look at that differently with 5000 years of history but if one you know if the if the if the government can really why in 5 years plan of the now every 5 years plan keep the economic growth i think the economic growth and the prosperity for its citizens is

the biggest digital message for the government to probably exercise the governance and you see for the last 4 decades china has lifted 800000000 people out of property china has now become the 2nd largest economy in the war china is the largest trading nation for 130 countries china in the last 1015 years you know build up the high speed rail way past faster networking toward the total length of that is equal to the next 10 countries combined so you think this is all getting overlooked because it's become about trade and the trade and i actually say so-called trade war because i think you know a war is a strange way to describe really what's going on but do you think that actually overshadowed the rest of the chinese story absolutely i think it is true it was you know they didn't look at the chief been the chinese government and the chinese people have working so hard to have you know that china is a country built of 30 percent. every year of that world g.d.p.

gross i mean if we have not become one of the strong locomotive of the world economy so if china collapse if china really gets bad and not going to keep its 6 percent above g.d.p. growth china could export famine china could export refugees china could become a very chaotic and that would that be a ideal situation for other countries i don't think so so so it's really important to see that china if we can if we really can do well if they can lift 800000000 people out of property and cut 70 percent of world propre property by by by percentage that's you know let it be and i remember well the job in the late leader of china it doesn't matter is a black cat or white cat as long as catches mice so if this system works if this is the walks in china based on it's a culture. you know. tradition and heritage so why not let it be you know i think more out of the article. misunderstanding and there's not

enough communication and there's a lot of fear out of this then it's comes down to the trade war and even for trade the war is worth a lot of measly interpretation because china wasn't really the benefit for example you are saying they got there all the trade deficit on the service treat us as a big star plus there's $1000000000.00 chinese students study in the u.s. contributed $20000000000.00 a year the streaming in chinese tourists to around the u.s. in a country another sort of billing a year and all those that are counted in our channels are paying a lot of pain tens and paying a lot of i.p.r. fees and things like that you know everything you've described of china is really capitalism personified and yet it remains a communist nation is that problem for china how does it operate 2 systems effectively what i think there's a there's a quite a bit of misunderstanding. the chinese system chinese actually is a mixed economy will be impacted on this market reform china is basically the

market economy the government is in those central planning is really getting you know i mean totally out of money opens all the sectors and then you look at china composition it has a you know private sector which employs 90 percent of the workforce contribute about the 60 to 70 percent of china's g.d.p. gross and then there is another maybe $1015.00 or 20 percent of so eat you know contributor chinese the g.d.p. and then there's not a 10 percent a multinational so it's really good the combination of private sector some is so he's a multinational so it's a it's a hybrid car but you can say that it's a black economy but with the chinese characteristics so i think in that kind of system it's stabilized the employer provides all employment to the citizens but also if there's a disaster you know social is about stability so you can also take take that you know not a profitable level so i think and also the chinese there was

a buy it on road initiative that that all comes together i just wonder how long that can be maintained and i know that sounds odd given as you say there's a 5000 year history of mirror story yet but i wonder as we move more and more and as this. catalyst nature takes over more and more want to get to a stage one day when the people actually want. but a democratic country that you know that they don't want to be that mixed economy they actually want to be a fully democratic society i think you know. you know i mean the professor said that the end of the history even he himself think that was a conclusion draw too early but you see actually given for the western style democracy it's not the same and it's not really achieved what has been going on you can see there we have seen the populism we see the bre-x. it for several years still hasn't been done we've seen. the yellow vast we've seen

you know all those recently arrested in the span chile and the middle east of course as well so you see this kind of a you know if it's really totally rely on the so-called democratic movement it's not really you know it's creating a lot of problems it's not a panacea for the problem so so i think that we have to bear in mind the technology the internet the mobile phones and everything it's creating a virtual. material democracy for example in china 111000000000 small for users every day there they're taking their votes what to buy work to shower where to go over to where to watch what which rest on the day they are using their cell or phone to cast their votes every day that's a market economy and also on the other hand china is watched by 200 some countries the united nations sowed in the media and they've been they've been they've been

criticizing china on they've been pinpoint china every day so china leadership and also you know general people lead in china they know what's going on they've been they've been feedback by all those criticism and servers of course so that they can reflect they can really respond and also china is really on the think tanks and acts per system visibility studies which. in greece the world bank in a competitive bidding system so everything in china is is is more internationalized i don't see how you know under this kind of system is any different as long as people are really happy and then as long as they are really getting a beacon on benefit maybe there's a little bit of. social the individual right maybe not perfectly practiced but china is a collective society anyway but his hunger i mean i mentioned hong kong just in passing is that show a little bit of a wake up call for china as well just

a reminder of what people do sometimes want and i know it's a different system in hong kong you know this is what the hope issue is on a similar item of the hong kong is exactly because the $102.00 system china let a free hand of hong kong and let hong kong people decide their own governance and future but that's probably connected to hong kong young people. you know desire and that's so that people felt as though raised their prices so high they cannot afford housing they can there's no job of it and also you know what hong kong is also not really catching up on the new sectors and the new new new development impetus actually used to when they take over in 1997 hong kong comes about 30 or 40 percent of china's g.d.p. now you know has taken over hong kong. so you see so there is a bit of a gap and those young people in hong kong make same as mainland but they but the

the same that when they may they cannot afford even stout in hong kong so i think that's where the problem i think the future for that is really to integrate hong kong was great. hong kong and then so that young people came across the border work and married and start to go to university and so they can social security and hospital you know everything that that they can really solve that problem let's look at china then in the context of the rest of the world what did you say before the growth rate was at the moment what the knowledge they maintained their latest these 6.2 so. incredibly strong yes i mean it's gone down from the great 10 days of 16 percent but it's still by world standards very strong the international monetary fund's global outlook for 29 t. they think it's global growth is going to slow to about 3 percent yes and that actually this trade war between china and the u.s. could be a large factor in that you have

a little bit totally agree i totally agree i was i was always christine lagarde last year at the munich a secure conference and and also the new chief of former c.e.o. of war back at the same panel and you know they made a prediction is absolute right because you see the thing about the china trade ways that it dampens confidence it's actually make people reluctant to invest and those people you know the value chains are hated on that because china is at the center of the global value chain you know a lot of things goes through china and then china is the number one per producer of 200 some products in the world so if china is really hit by this trade war but old other suppliers from from other regions from other countries were only fact affected and also so you return that you have a factor u.s. as well so i don't see how you know how the world economy will maintain such a strong growth. and then become effective how dangerous is 3 percent

given that we are only 10 years now since the start of the global financial crisis if we getting down to 3 percent again how risky is that for a quote unquote global recession no that's why i mean this this partial deal with the president trump and china strike in the last months is absolutely crucial because if we do not do that i mean the 2 biggest economic power in the word and then if they if they really fight i mean all the others will suffer absolutely and then we will drag the world into recession and that's quite possible too and we may not have another financial crisis because this is really a long. situation i think that we should realize that we we need to do that but it was an even worse is that there are some people even in the us thinking about the couple also we have a 2 track world and things like that you cannot. have economic nato now we can't afford the military war now you may want to get into economic war and that's

going to be very dangerous how would china whether any economic global economic downturn because there was a move 5 probably more than 5 years ago for china to turn away from. exports and actually try and make its domestic economy increase domestic consumption so that it could be insulated as that actually works because that's a big ship to turn around isn't it when you've got a completely or a very strongly ex war based economy and then you say right we want to start changing it we want to make it more domestically driven that's a huge task well that's probably happening because you know in the past china was export led it was really export driven economy now china is really cutting down on that. for example service in china and by the 35 years plan by 2020 it will take almost 60 percent of the chinese g.d.p. so the chinese don't mess to consumption is greatly stimulate lower and also there's more room for china to invest in its infrastructure for example and

a brand new airport would just open in beijing just to see that china can use the stimulus package china really stupid a domestic consumption which is 1400000000 people itself it's a self-sustaining you've got an audience if it's going to a captive audience that's not what i mean but you've got that ready made. population there yes china could effectively operate on its own that's right john has 1400000000 people we're unified market one currency one system and 1000000000 smartphone users china is the is getting leaps and bond into the into the into the new economy you know and then actually the china already have a 400 minute middle class buyers now and the we have seen the new reports saying that china has more 1000000000 there now than the united states more 1000000000 as well absolutely so you see that actually happen now and then by the next 1015 years

china could have 800000000 middle class so itself china can you know survive it's pretty well i mean china has you know if we're talking about category of production category or kind of product china is the china has the most products. by the united nations so china can be a self-sustaining well well balanced economy weather all the storms of the financial crisis china actually did very well in the last financial crisis to it so so i think that if china was was really forced to do that china can but what china wants to do is china wants the contribution china wants to say let's do international in a multilateral says let's reform wu let's let's. go you know let's work with world bank be an everybody you know for example is a good example of that so so i think it's really important that china and us work together the 2 largest economy if they fight i mean definite the world's going to suffer yeah we are a year away give or take from the u.s.

election from perhaps the most definitive u.s. election we have seen in years i mean. does this have the potential to play out for the next 12 months under president trump and then it could all it could all change again couldn't it i think that what the president has been doing in the last. 2 and a half 3 years is that initially this of this intelligent military report the position of china as a strategic rivalry now has spread across the board you know everybody think china is a struggle rivalry you know we could be a corporative rival could be a healthy competition but not strategic revery so if you really pretty place china is the enemy of the u.s. and that's really dangerous but i think what's more important is that the president promised to have a year left in the white house and then what he has to deliver right i mean the message code kind of the u.s. agreement still hasn't been ratified and then what else you know we need he needs

the. voters and what he has done for the last several years so china is a big deal of a big part of that i think he doesn't have the time is running out i mean let's get everything we have achieved we can't do a perfect you but let's get you know. the evil 90 percent has great let's build that so so i think it's really important that we need to stop this the downward spiral you know we need to really stabilize that and that with we need some progress and we need to lift the confidence and we need to you know gets got to reinforce the have a better deal and a face to face 3 and that's that's really what for the for the best of the benefits of the mankind and that's what china wants i mean that's essential you want well absolutely china china is of course china's never rock the boat image china did a study as trade toward china was really. very a defensive position but as a chinese gone as a child and they were afraid of the trade but about the one to initiate great trade war they really want to peace and prosperity talk to one president and founder of

the center for china globalization thank you for talking to al-jazeera thank you thank you.

my name is some people say that my feelings are only programmed that they're not real but if i think the real they are real don't you think south america was designed to be the world's most advanced autonomous android which is one of the more advanced robots in the world can around but feel that's a philosophical question it's not a lot of what you do socially connect on a subconscious level we are creating this new kind of entity. trouble began at the end of the country's civil war when most people started returning home from refugee camps. now more who are strapped and killed during a demonstration in 2017 is buried right here in the middle of the street as a sign of resistance to the mining companies and government are set in your. i tunes nation suffered abuse and displacement between the communities the mining companies and the government has now as committed to west africa as regional court

the community has taken its case before west africa's regional court because they say the people have little for use in the justice system. and though i'm barbara starr in london these are the top stories on al-jazeera ukrainian government forces and russian backed separatists have exchanged $200.00 prisoners in a move aimed at ending 5 years of war those released include soldiers civilians and members of a special police force were accused of killing protesters in kiev in 2014 the swap is part of an agreement between the leaders of ukraine russia germany and france well the journalist alexander go fry in moscow says the prisoner swap has largely been welcomed a lot of moves along.