this is many challenges this troubridge, the ira says later on monday, it is the start of what nasa hopes will be a long series of crew rotations for the jobs of lab results there. and these are the top stories u.s. of a suitable for madonna says early results from its covered 90 vaccine show. it's nearly 95 percent effective. it's now in stage 3 clinical trials, pfizer announced last week, its vaccine is 90 percent effective. but donna says there's still lots of work to be done before distribution can begin to really important milestone in the fight against the pandemic. because it demonstrates that our very senior morning to all $73.00 is able to prevent cope with 19 disease including severe disease. and it's really just a milestone. we have a lot of work ahead of us knowing the vaccine is going to be effective. it's great news, but we still need to complete

a regulatory process which involves completing the study, generally more to follow up. and then of course, we need to get busy manufacture. if the o.p.'s government is sending reinforcements to its rest of northern region, t.p.a. other forces are appealing to the international community to condemn the offensive . but the government has ruled out mediation efforts. a media as foreign minister has resigned after days of protest against a peace deal with azerbaijan, the prime minister and he called the show me on refuses to step down, has defended the decision to head back parts of the cornal cut a buck wild of his incumbent. president evo dons says he will concede defeat if the courts find no problems with the election. with most votes count of pro european challenger, my assad is projected to win. syrian foreign minister walid has done. he was 79 years old. ma them was a close ally of former syrian leader assad. then his son, bashar assad's,

throughout the war. he repeatedly defended government forces against allegations of war, crimes and crimes against humanity and breaking news. donald trump's national security adviser has said he's hopeful that the cuttle blockade could be resolved in the next 70 days. officer brian was speaking at a global security forum hosted by kata. he says it's possible the blockade could be resolved before a transition in office. saudi arabia, bahrain, egypt, and the u.a.e. imposed a land sea and air blockade on cutoff and 2017. well, those are the headlines to stay with us. the news will continue here on al-jazeera right off the inside story.

and 15 countries have signed the world largest retreat agreement. china is in the united states is out. so why is the asia pacific partnership so important and how will it help the region's economy? this is inside story. hello, welcome to the program. bernard. a 3rd of the global economy comes under the new regional comprehensive economic partnership, or os up china, 10 southeast asian nations. along with south korea, japan, australia, and new zealand have signed up. the u.s.

is excluded, leaving china as the dominant economy in the bloc will bring in our guests in a moment 1st, this report from florence louis in kuala. after 8 years of talks, the regional comprehensive economic partnership or ourselves, is finally signed, meeting virtually because of the pandemic. leaders from 15 countries including china, japan, and 10 members of the association of southeast asian nations, into the agreement in their respective countries. the conclusion of our sept negotiation, the largest free trade agreement in the world, will send a strong message that affirms leading role in supporting the multilateral trading system, creating a new trading structure in the region. it's an ambitious deal covering nearly 30 percent of global economic output and a 3rd of the world's population. the agreement aims to lower tariffs and open up

trade and investment in stages. it will provide a simpler trading framework, meaning businesses won't have to navigate separate requirements to export to different countries. china is the biggest member in the trading block. its importance in the region grew even more after the u.s. led by president donald trump pulled out of the trade pact in 2017. that deal then known as the transpacific partnership would have been the biggest trade deal in the world. analysts say china is now poised to extend its influence even further. does not mean that things are going to change overnight, dramatically, but as things unfold over the future and new issues come up that need to be, i'm also going to be one of those times and simply because i'm a member and of course, charmers largest member does i think charmin, a very influential position by the future development of trade in the region. this

is also the 1st to free trade deal between rival east asian countries. china, japan, and south korea. the deal falls short in some areas. member states one day able to agree on some of the provisions on a come us. the agreement also does not include environmentalists protections or set labor standards. the pact will come into force once enough, member states ratified the agreement domestically. a process that could take up to 2 years, florence louis al-jazeera kuala lumpur. let's bring in our guests in kuala lumpur. we have far, kim bank, the founder of the strategic pan, indo-pacific arena, think tank. and he's also the former director of political and security community in the asean secretary at in london. this gareth lever, senior economist at capital economics, where he specializes in emerging markets and asian economies. and joining us from

washington, d.c. is stan boyd, a resident scholar at the american enterprise institute. welcome to you all. i'll start with you can bang were quiet. china is clearly the biggest economy in this group in what are its priorities now that this deal is signed? why is china so in favor of it? were the headlines all over the world or seems to be accurate in the believe that china will be gaining from this agreement because it's the largest agreement free trade agreement ever. it comprises 30 percent of all the g.d.p. in the world. but having sits, or china is an economy that is all saw trying to, can't fully navigate its way into the future in light of the pandemic that it just came out from. and also the pandemic which might become and that it would out the world in spite of what we have seen in face of bio and or even modern,

where the vaccine has an ephesians series of more than 92 to 94 percent. so all china is actually very secure and very seat in its own cookoo. however, china is a country that relies immensely on globalisation to benefit for our all that from all the benefits of retreat. if i may put it that way. ok. so china can gain from it. however, if we look at what the chinese leadership had agreed on the feet planted on october 29th just a month ago, they have basically come out. we've planned

a 5 year plan to try to steer china into an economy that can provide high quality growth. and it's not state that in the communiqué of their field, plant him. but at the back of the mind of all the decision makers and the economic plan, as in china, they have $100.00 smart city plans already in the works ok. now, if we look at that in the context of what we, what we have achieved today across the region, which is our step. we could come clue that we are eating a few steps behind china because china has already come up with our plans to net to see a economy follow it. and it has also beyond gone beyond the regular deregulation.

but our set is something that focuses more on the old economy, where even the electronic commerce was not given significant and persists except the reduction of carrier. ok. i mean of all right, let me bring in the us, came bang with what do you think china's priorities might be a counterweight to, to u.s. influence? is it more political than, than, than economic? i think it's very much more political than economic that the, this trade is obviously generated a lot of excitement coming as it has on the back of the trade war, which we in the us and shown around what we see the global pandemic. but all these countries, or most of these countries trade quite freely with each other anyway, that tariffs are already very low. so they're basically going to lower tariffs room from what are already very low levels to lower them for the economic benefit of this is actually going to be quite small. it's not one of these new age trade deals, like the t.p. p.,

which focused on more than which focus a lot more nontariff barriers. so it's very much a political thing for china. it's allowing to kind of cast itself as a champion of globalization. it's also allowing to increase employment in asia and kind of take over that role from the u.s. . so he's very much a political thing, rather than economic benefits from china suspect to stand gareth mentioned there, the t p p, the trans-pacific partnership, which the u.s. intended to be a part of that president trump quit it. would you think president elect biden? want to renegotiate access to the t.p. pier and how easy would that be? should he want to try and do that? i mean, i would hope so. obviously, the narrative here in american politics over the past 5 or so years has been that, you know, to vote for soon to be former president, trump was in part an expression of discontent, about globalization, about about air national trade. and so i think that's made politicians

a little more hesitant to support a new free trade agreement. and in fact, president elect biden has said that he will not out of the gate start negotiating new trade agreement. that said, i think at the same time we've seen a rise of concern about china's role in the world and behavior at home. and so if he were to be or did or d.p.p. can be framed as really an instrument to isolate china, to reduce its parent influence in the region, then i think it's much more politically palatable. i think that's what we should hope for. i think also of course, just like this agreement, the d.p.p. agreement would have significant economic advantages. i, you know, i'd be, i'd hope that president biden would push for us rejoining, regardless of the geopolitical considerations. but i think the geopolitical

considerations are important and in the block a context potentially crucial. ok, again, bang goth was also saying how already tariffs are very low between these countries on many goods. but how difficult is it to bring such diverse economies and cultures from music, from new zealand to laos, for example, together, how do you get an agreement to be any deeper than this one already? it's how difficult is it? that's a very good question and i agree with my colleagues in the united kingdom that they've got the benefits of very little. in fact, the research has been done on what the countries can gain out of our set ease,, even when the whole agreement is ratify. the g.d.p. the benefits from the g.d.p. will only accrue to mock a little less than 0.2 percent for each member state. so it's more political rather than economic. having said so on,

this is one of the most difficult agreement to come up with. it has it. as the our commentator mentioned earlier, it took 8 years to reach the the stage. in fact, i would go even a further bank. the member states of association of southeast asian nations r.c.n. began the process of negotiating free trade agreement with china. we back in 2002 and only achieving their goal in 2010. so that process also took our 8 years. that's 2002 to 2010. and then 2 years later,, the countries decided to x., especially china, japan and korea, decided to expand size and scale of their retreat area, which is what we now refer to as our set. ok, gareth,

one significant aspect of this agreement is on the rules of origin. just give us a very quickly people understand what rules of origin means and how about will benefit trade within this new group? yeah, i think this is one of the pretty much the only kind of known tariff benefit that you'll see from this. and whereby it means that if a good imported a component is imported from one country to another, then sold off to a 3rd. it basically facilitates this trade, the other wives who get caught up in lots of different tariff level. so it should make it a lot easier to establish the kind of supply chain networks that you see in china across the region. so this should be some benefit. there, i think the other point to make out as well is that most of these tariff reductions are going to take place over a number of years. they're not going to happen straightaway. and they're also missing out the agricultural sector pretty much entirely. so, you know, the benefits from this is going to take

a long time to come to fruition. it's not going to provide a commercial stimulus or a short term boost to regional growth in any way whatsoever for the u.s. economy for us export. is there the rules of origin agreement for this new grouping? make it harder for us export as it's something they should be bothered about. i don't think the us exports will be bothered about this so much, but i think what it does show is that they're potentially missing out on of the fastest growing market in the world. that they spent so much time negotiating the t.p. be both as a counterweight to china, but also as a way to boost export markets. and then fifa trying to kind of unilaterally withdraw on the 1st day in office was a real hammer blow to them. so we interesting to see what biden wants to do regards trying to maybe negotiate or go, she hates the us still there. i suspect that, you know, given there's no appetite in congress for further free trade deals that we probably won't see much progress. and that this is very much

a case of wait and see the standard thing u.s. exporters will suffer because of this new agreement. i mean, i think i agree with, with, with garrett you're right. you have, you have to do a fact from these kind of regional groupings. one, facilitate trade within the grouping. but obviously there's a little bit of divergence of trade that otherwise would have happened with, with 3rd 3rd countries outside of the, the grouping. the, let me, let me go back to something that's come up a couple of times. now i think that there is a bit of disappointment on how you know, this trade agreement does not extend beyond is sort of, you know, your traditional tariff reductions towards things like labor market or environmentalists regulations. i think it's important to keep in mind that that also cuts both ways, right? on the one hand, of course, if you, if you have a deeper dream and that presumably facilitates a more efficient allocation of capital. and there may be equity concerns about the

way in which workers are treated and in some countries, at the same time, of course, the more different countries are, the greater potential is for gains from trade, right? and so you do, you do have particularly large benefits from free exchange when, when countries start from relatively different positions in terms of their regulations, their strengths, their weaknesses. and so i think that that's important to keep in mind that i think there's and we saw that in the renegotiation in nafta here as well. there is a tendency to try and impose all of your domestic rules on other countries. and that's not always, i think, the way to go from an economic perspective. ok, kim, buying china and japan. they don't already have any sort of mutual free trade agreement, tokyo's, wary of beijing's growing military power. china's economies overtaken japan. how,

how is japan benefiting from this? how might it benefit from this? well, japan is a grain society. the japanese economy was doing very well prior to depend on me because it was heading towards the tokyo 2020 alam pics. but having seen the effects of the pandemic, the impact is actually very galling tourism is that this takes on tourism, going to japan has dropped by shot the ring 99 percent. so basically nothing is really moving. and if you, if the question is on how japan can handle china's and large footprint, our role in the region i thing japan would still cling on to the united states. but then surely hoping that the trans-pacific partnership agreement would be brought

back by present your biden up, or president elect george joe biden right now to see to exceed what our set can provide to japan. ok, gareth about australia. i want to ask you, it's china's top trade partner, beijing, a slapped import restrictions of some sort or other on shellfish, wine beef and, and barley after cambra called for investigations into the origins of the cove in 1000 outbreak. can australia benefit from this? is there a way for it to diversify away from china? potentially if they could sell more to the markets in asia, those goods that, that china slap tariffs on, but ideally from australia's point of view, this deal will make it harder for china to impose these retired 3 measures. so i think that's the main way that australia could presumably benefit from this. i

think the key point to bear in mind with this discussion on the australia, china spot is that the goods that we're talking about at the moment have been subject to these are attaching chairs. they're actually quite a small deal from australia's perspective. i think there would be quite significant economic ramifications if, for example, china starts to impose duties on australian idol, which is the big thing that australia sells to china. but i think it's very unlikely to happen for the simple reason is that china is very dependent on imports of australia, of iron ore. so it's a very can a symbiotic relationship in that respect. so. so i think that's the can a key point to bear in mind these, these returns the measures you've seen so far from china being quite small. but they should actually be harder to introduce, you know, if this new agreement does have the teeth of that should have. and stan, if we can take a look at global trade, i'll tell you what singapore's prime minister remarked when this agreement was signed. he said, multilateralism is losing ground. the asset shows support the close and connected

supply chains and closer into dependence. of course, the trumpet, ministration took the opposite view as hard as the u.k. bragg's it, who will be on the right side of this argument. well, i think the trump and ministrations policies i don't think have, have accomplished done any and in many ways i think have backfired. obviously, the trump administration did not succeed in, in isolating china, or really even in getting it to make direct bilateral concessions beyond promises of purchases of soybeans, which i don't think is the grand geo political interest that likes of steve van and used to tout. and so i think there we've, we've seen kind of a backlash. if you look at poll numbers in the us now support for higher levels of immigration have, has gone up since 2016. trade has gotten a bit more popular too that the politics are

a bit more regional. and so that's more complicated, but i do think we've seen a bit of a backlash there. i think it's reassuring to see this kind of agreement in that context, be dependent make an economic downturn. i think that by the ministration putting china aside for a moment will, will surely return to at least in terms of process, more multilateralism. if not a full embrace of new trade agreements. and so i do think we've seen some pushback and i think it's very difficult to argue that to go to your question on the u.k. . it's very difficult to argue that the bracks it process has been a smooth one that has brought the u.k. tremendous benefit. i think the u.k. is before ming worth macroeconomic leave them practically any other country in europe. it's obviously been almost 5 years now. they still haven't been able to sign new trade agreements with their main trading partners. they still haven't figured out how to deal with the situation in ireland, etc. and so, you know, i think that, that move away from, from globalisation,

from multilateralism from free trade. and you know, at least some room for, for immigration flows i think that has really sailed and shown to be a bit of a bit of a scam. to be honest. do you think this is a shot in the arm for multilateralism? given that it could take years for this deal to be fully ratified. it's not going to be ratified by at least 6 countries. there's less emphasis on labor rights on environmental and intellectual property protection. what is it safer, multilateralism? well, 1st of all, if this is only in the beginning of the journey, a very complex and difficult journey. the agreement itself, there are set. the greenman itself is $510.00 pages with a lot of an excess. when an agreement has a lot of an excess, it doesn't bode well. to be frank. as a malaysian, the ministry of international trade and industry was very abutilon,

that this will open up the regional economy for malaysia. personally, i disagree completely. i think he's, he's on the wrong wrong side of understanding the agreement because 1st of all 6 countries out of 10 would have to read to fight their green men over the next, next 2 years and then an other night dialogue partners are 15 for on the whole framework would have to read to fight them further and that includes australia. so there are a lot of hoops to jump through over the next 2 years. now there's one little point, it would just like to ok. now we've got to do what u.k. kalid has mention on roofs of our lives in may be people who are very and mannish and involved in treat will feel very happy because

the rules of origin say that anything that is within the trash will or 40 percent would qualify before i would qualify for the free trash will do export all, sell their goods into another country and anything that is source from and out of the region that are not part of the us are going as, as far as 60 percent would still qualify and maybe that is the reason for the billions and and exuberance and the joy. but personally, i don't think this is a good agreement. ok, gareth very quickly then from you, is this a good sign that multilateralism is the future or would be a bit too optimistic? and ideas like briggs's are the way forward i think is certainly a step in the right direction. it does show that outside of the us and the u.k. that most countries remain keen on, on free trade and closer agreements with each other. but i think the benefits of

this despite being touted as the biggest free trade agreements in the world are quite small and they won't come into effect for a number of years. so i wouldn't get too carried away by our gentleman. thank you very much. we're out of time unfortunately. thanks to all our guests to fark in bang to gareth leather, understand boyda, and thank you too for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website, al-jazeera dot com and for further debate, go to our facebook page. that's facebook dot com, forward slash a.j. inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a j inside story. from a bernard smith and the entire team here by thinner setting

the discussions. millions of americans feel disaffected by both political parties. examining the headlines, this group of activists and relatives are marching band clinton right now where they're calling for morning edition picks, but or in a fund and so called class programming designed to inform why is the only solution for a child as young as 10 months. if they come to inspire, you see the weld from a different perspective on how to 0. 1 of the most wanted men on the planet masterminded a $4500000000.00 fraud and want to put him in jail. but you cannot help being in the past. just 0 reveals never before heard recordings implicating some of

the world's most powerful players. everyone close to her would benefit by the abuse of power and corruption. joe wrote and for a fugitive on a just 20 years of china's transformation told through one young girl's journey from birth to adult 2 decades following the development of her life. i mention, rewind returns to the story of k.k., the girl from going joe on the al-jazeera on countering the cos, the once mighty financial capitals of the world have been reduced to ghost towns by the pandemic. can they reinvent themselves? plus to he's president far as the central bank governor after his son in law steps

down as finance minister counting the cost on al-jazeera be the hero in the world in washington. this is al jazeera to get al, this is the news hour live from doha, coming up in the next 60 minutes. our next scene or morning 1273 is able to prevent coverage. 90 disease, including severe disease. it will receive another breakthrough in the race for a coronavirus vaccine. as early trial results show, it's nearly 95 percent effective. u.s. president donald trump's, a national security adviser expresses the admin.