and similarities of cultures across the world. center magic. al-jazeera bringing you the news and current affairs that matter to. you what you all deserve it means the whole robin remind of our top news stories israel has launched $150.00 yes strikes in an hour on gaza it intense night of raids a girls being pulled from the rubble as rescuers search for more survivors at least 154 palestinians have been killed since monday suffered more from gaza. we can hear the explosions we can hear the rain in a view also participating and and the shelling some of the time the navy shells are

landing and a lot and empty field across the course of the line of the guards there also the last report coming from the north the south of the gaza strip across the border with egypt as the israeli forces attacked one of the border police also stationed there that israeli artillery could be heard from time to time also firing the day of the shells into the the border line with god everything goes on israel. the minister of health said corrected what we we reported earlier that a doctor his wife and 5 children killed they confirmed that the rescue teams while digging they found 5 children alive and. they believe that there are still some more people alive under the rubble of the destroyed house from the last 10 civil. rights doctors and are because it only goes all over the gaza

strip about $150.00 intensive. they describe all over the gaza strip at least 60 of them where on in gaza city as. entire text of that district was either destroyed or partial property damage i'm talking about the residential houses the infrastructure of the roads cythera. hamas has fired more rockets towards israel most were intercepted by the iron dome defense systems at least 10 people have been injured in those attacks 10 others have died in israel since the conflict escalated well earlier on friday israel destroyed an 11 story building housing international media groups including al jazeera and associated press both companies have condemned the attack and vowed to continue reporting from within garza israel but barnes of gaza has part of

a global solidarity rallies have been held across the globe as tens of thousands of people gather to show support for the palestinian people rockey demonstrators held a rally in the capital to her square many were shouting anti israel slogans while some were seen burning israeli flags and there were similar scenes in the u.k. thousands of people in london called on the government to take immediate action to help end the fighting in the u.s. solidarity protests were held in several cities including the capital washington d.c. they accuse the government of funding what they call israeli war and torture in palestine but also large demonstrations in new york and boston. and dozens of protesters in mexico city have been calling for an end to israel's bombardment on the establishment of a palestinian state the palestinian flag was painted on the square at the solidarity rally. saturday is also the 1st day of a historic today vote in chile which is electing an assembly to write

a new constitution 50 percent of those elected must be female also 30 people have been sentenced to death in the democratic republic of congo after violence between rival muslim groups protesters were fighting over the right to celebrate the end of ramadan that the sports stadium in the capital kinshasa a police officer was killed and several others were injured. india is reporting a fall in daily corona virus infections but an increase in the deaths to almost $4100.00 police are patrolling the ganges after the bodies of about 2000 suspected covert 19 victims were recovered from the river taiwan is imposing new restrictions as it battles its worst outbreak since the pandemic began in taipei and surrounding areas indoor gatherings are limited to 5 people and shops and restaurants continue to be closed. with headlines are now deserted to stay with us more in half an hour . org.

we even a world where industry doesn't want any regulation they just want to put the products

on the market. and. we need a regulation so we don't do. crazy things because maybe sometimes we do crazy things i don't know but i'll accept that we have regulation we want to regulation i was in this. we don't behave then yes penalties that's fine. obviously the the industry makes money of course it does if the industry did not make money how many people would be out of work. or sort of the last concern the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedent corporate interests corporate profits have been getting priority with the regulator so that needs to change and one of the big ways to do that is just to require transparency. we we'd love transparency we would like to publish everything. we use. it's just not

allowed and we as if they cannot say we don't care there's intellect or property rights but we are if so we publish everything's it would just be breaking the law. they prefer intellectual property. to the health of children. if you make money out of selling pesticides how much incentive. does these companies do these companies have to get us off pesticides will they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or will they make sure that we use always more pesticides. today the industry prefers to spend millions of euros in lobbying to delay regulations instead of researching substitutes and how to make these things differently.

it's in the industry's interests to bring food to the tables that is safe it's high quality. that is reasonably priced so that you and i and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good nutritious food every day actually help us. progress involves risk you are referring to 2 accidents industrial incidents white students or people who are injured or people die every time this happens for industry in general it's a defeat. however those incidents also allows to improve to do it better next time and to progress and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus going feel. the fact that what is progress

is progress moving forward whatever and using any technology we are capable of inventing but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful and that it's good for for the people with it we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progress is i don't think that progress is ruining the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that that can that can treat disease and if cancer. to someone who's 20 years old that's the worst.

if we were to there was a progression or principle probably would not have airplanes elbridge would not exist because airplanes sometimes they fall down so there is a risk we would not have automobiles because every year in europe 5060000 people die with automobile accidents so progression re principle i think is a disaster. and yet this is what we are now more and more advocating. and your place is to agriculture we are. for me in europe. north

america or south america. because we don't. we don't. i mean it doesn't make sense we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not. and in europe we have this romantic idea of. business people. they will never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something they don't need. just business people and we should let them do the business and. i. and we can't expect them to act in any other way except as business.

the only way that would change is if there is a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat food like a global commodity. we have a very big problem. and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder and the highest bidder may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bidder maybe someone wants to feed your car this is entirely the wrong way to look at food food should be sued.

agribusiness is all about making money. making profits it's about because. it's about an informative. big uniform lannes with one group. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also economically it's about international markets import export it's all about companies controlling involve way places lands the export commodities is not about food production it's not about feeding people. industrial agriculture is

a form of mining. and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses and the most of the uses go into animal food and textiles fiber fuel whatever you have the the rest of it can't be sold more expensive to some other use will go into processed in food processing. so it's food and i city always food a business transaction food is both so we all need to eat that's for sure but in europe we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a famine in europe hundreds of years so we have no idea what it means. to have the choice between one tomato and no tomato we have tend to want your doesn't really

matter to us if we have a g.m.o. tomato not you and i think we are. unaware of the impact our decisions here have on countries where there is no food no where days this is the big confusion between what is the general interest in the interest of industry because the priorities jobs and growth and it's like growth and jobs are more important than people's lives. if the so food industry is successful it will create more jobs it will create more value added it will create more quotes so i don't see why we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry but this should be a communal fight. modern i recall sure relies on some of the rights relies on precision from mean which is

a connection between satellites digital machinery and orally to switch off the variable for farmers. unfortunately i think europe is losing its edge as far as food production and agriculture because of overly. conservative restrictive regulation and the tradeoff between progress and risk is not well understood in europe. i think europe is the best potential to be easy leading agricultural region in the world we should be the ones with the best jobs and the most invested in seeds in

hybridization genetic space the size chemicals machinery we should be because we have everything we need to succeed and my fear is that we are not using this potential to its maximum. what we want to see is something very different is a model built on diversity on biological diversity that is you know different crops planted together crop rotations. do we get as humanity our act together to change and reconfiguring together how we operate on this planet. we will make ourselves obsolete. that's a defining moment and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong they have to be then assistant to golds while many people if i say that would say

yes yes of course makes sense but. i have not understood that this is not where we are now we are now defining future visions through technology lenses but i want to turn it around i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be in how we want to design our environment and our food system that operates within the planetary boundaries as scientists so if in defining where it respects the rules of the planet. and not vice versa we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms. what progress do we want are we willing to trade or so most of the benefits for

some of the risk because we're facing a world. which is more and more globalized so we are up against. other parts of the world which do not always play it with the same growth. there are geopolitical issues and boss of the world where there is less food and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the world either through a needle through producing it themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land and as we told you as more we called use more resources.

no i can say you know they momento up. to simply the commander of the for the muscles are really yes accumulate go to me come in and sing the. militias that are they love us the blackest yes ok i remember we were on. a $1000000000.00. do you imagine the number of chronic diseases that are in every family today. it is not due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all breast cancers for instance that's not true so it is due to environment and to chronic

poisons that outnumber what down the chronic poisons this sign to be toxic initially and spread all over the place. west is. going to you're going to use it in tissue did it because his mum i know booklet i work and i'm critic dissident do your choice on your continuum enough to mama levin is he also merely go know what i said in my life. yoda and more credited to beatrice hein your community country mama in-flow model. just as he could in a medium of tolls among the cheeky thing to put in the cell even. i in this is it the best thing i feel insulted toxic cause so look. dude out of the

blue. they don't know the most 11 or. they've been given a boost via ferrata must say we came best to get sober last cover the lesson for me . is let's hit the market in the got out of the nato. if you will not to because have it gotten the other shoe stuff just kept whether any of this into putting them in your. local call me a very speedy baby done the sec waste that bottle of beer is a council more people cause that i saw stuff yes. this is so oxy gust but a lot of broke feel on but it's just a motor on 30 minutes i stuck in one piece i would suspect chance yes to set it

will up more than by side because on the know the thing you know i can notice you don't you should put on your limit to much you want to see you feel to you if we took a few minutes we are stupid on the. last tiem out. to put up road to seem to be the only. thing as he did to for me until he would. the comedian see the scene for what he'll does he can look good in it but only because he will see rebuttals you take it in in the kitchen between don't you get into to implement any more kimono and must be able to do given he had a lovely look at our own saliva he did the model it 2 weeks and i already have a must do today can make it a lot me more ill be threaded them into lens and our last will be document among.

each other. is a calculus nothing but a composite of individually but can only correct post reactivated us as a limited cover seed to individual in the wallet he had to see kentucky indeed go to the personnel blood of the media not to heal but to do the op or toggle as short a shield or my last field in plastic go by law to see though the law ill i want to see only in the south in the complete top of laws cannot say that the body will marvel see a few now then the men media. many

of us your points to modern agriculture have understood that it's it's easy to scare people it's easy to to use fear as a strong emotional. driver for a change in policy and for influencing policy sometimes it's in the interests of the. anti industry groups to do that of course because achatz their network brings in money for them as well so i think we should look at this from both sides we sometimes have visits from them recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and threw manure and threatening letters and stuff at 1st but ok that's part of the game i suppose we do not want you know when we fight against when we fight against when we try and dialogue with people either we don't have the same weapons i sometimes have the feeling that we have bows and arrows and they have atom bombs as soon as there's an engineer or group of people who are

against something maybe maybe the bandits maybe they stop using it in place of importing so in terms of development and trust i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has the truth we know what in our products for example that if i if i make a product i mean you can go home this evening and make a buy area in your kitchen and you know what's in there and you write it down that is the truth sorry but you know we are an industry we know what we put in our products we can tell you this is the truth this is what we put record in our products when i say we have the truth i'm talking about not talking about philosophically the truth i'm talking about what we do we know what we do and we can talk about it.

on the. phone recover you don't need a delivery assume this if it's your last something deep seeded this was. really hard. if you've read the book listen to one of the 2 don't moan it. also has a demo on. me and. on the hunt. for the help with donnie van. the one that the both. may. know will not. it is if not they. also met 2

more souls who have sun. on most highly. frank assessments of. exactly how may have been taking for a situation right not to be an. informed opinion as is the u.s. with thinking. positioning in the middle east or is it just a simple fact of the us that this is

a message to the region united states. its military posture in-depth analysis of the day school ople headlines inside story on al-jazeera. it's one of the most recognized sites around the world famed for its support from far and wide but for the fans back home it's more than just a football club and i want to tell policy should be left out of football you know football is no one politics and. the passion and the politics of liverpool f.c. the defiant giant. part of the fans who make football series on al-jazeera. bitcoin block chain and cryptocurrency its disruptive technology all the way to a fairer financial system and you have mining let me in your analysis and i will conference campaign finance award winning filmmaker thorsten hoffman looks at all sides of the complex crypto have a lot of feel them

a utopian dream of bypassing the international banking was just as easily manipulated as today's financial system crypto p.-a coming soon on al-jazeera. like. you all deserve the cell robin in doha a reminder of our top news stories israel has launched 150 as strikes in an hour long gaza in an intense night of raids a girl has been pulled from the rubble as rescuers search for more survivors at least 154 palestinians have been killed since monday somewhat of a 100 pounds the latest from gaza. the minister well. what we. reported earlier about dr is why 5 children killed they

confirmed that. while digging they found 5 children alive and. they believe that there are. more people alive under the rubble of the destroyed house from the last. 2 masses fired more rockets towards israel most were intercepted by the iron dome defense systems least 10 people have been injured in those latest attacks while 10 others have died in israel since the conflict escalated earlier on friday his role destroyed an 11 story building housing international media including al-jazeera and associated press both companies have condemned the attack and to continue reporting from within. india is reporting a fall in daily current virus infections but an increase in deaths to almost $4100.00 police are patrolling the ganges after the bodies of about 2000 suspected

cave 19 victims were recovered from the river families living off of money to help create or bury their loved ones 30 people have been sentenced to death in the democratic republic of congo after violence between rival muslim groups protesters were fighting over the right to celebrate the end of ramadan the sports stadium in the capital kinshasa a police officer was killed and several people injured hundreds of students have turned out in colombia's capital markets are in the latest anti government protests the demonstrators anger was initially aimed at proposed tax increases but has become a wider movement against the government. saturday's the 1st day of a historic 2 day variance in chile which is electing an assembly to write a new constitution 50 percent of those elected must be female those were the headlines that clocks here with more news in half an hour to stay with us here on al-jazeera. and the disease because

50 percent of all dads child. was abducted. was a child who did. it did you. believe you just leave it to. the ceasefire. was. i. i.

that is that companies have to submit studies to the european commission they do the studies themselves. they have to submit it to the european commission and to f. so so the european food safety authority and they have a tenet of experts that looks at the studies and then they say ok safe or not. so what we have found is that within these expert panels we have a lot of people with ties with the food industry so that means a conflict of interest.

so if someone wants to authorize a product in europe let's say a plant protection product this person because this person of these companies the applicant has to provide data that allows us as the risk assess those whether this product is safe or not and this information comes from the applicant and the studies that are commissioned by the applicant to allow us to assess the safety are paid by the applicant obviously so it's the intellectual property of the applicant and we can properly barks of these studies in the current legal framework but we also have to respect the business confidentiality claims of the applicants so there's a balance to be found between transparency as much as possible but also to protect the investment of companies into the. they are product innovations.

exactly like in the middle ages you were asking to the priest what is the truth in the whole you ask to these scientists in regular to religion sees what is the truth and they act in the same manner as magician you know because they work in secret compounds we secretly effects they say that you cannot publish that however they say they have the truth. if you spend a huge amount of money doing a study a study on something where there's a lot of confidential information that you don't want. another company to copy paste of course not i mean you might have spent years all over sources so people time a lot of time

a lot of money on doing this research. what after does it underlies all of that or publish the results so it will publish it will come out with a statement at the end. and it will publish the results but it won't publish all the details of what a lot of people want to see because there are a lot of people for a relative eyes all of whom because it's not actually a lot of people but some people. want to see everything that's fine i think now it's actually all been published but you're talking about several thousands of pages i don't know who in his right mind would sit down and read through all of those pages i think if some parts can be blacked out but i would insist that that's to do with privacy so the relationship between our companies and research institutes and universities is quite strong as i mentioned before in many parts of the world it tends to be the public sector developing the products thanks to a relationship with the company maybe the company donated the technology the problem in europe for example is that in f.

so that you mentioned before they have scientists assessing the products and the scientists have a obligation to have no conflict of interest that means they have to have had no relationship whatsoever with industry ever so if you're a scientist in europe. having any kind of dealing with a company closes a number of avenues of work later so again we are really champions in creating difficulties for ourselves in europe but the rest of the world is doing fine. but rather to how it's worked for monsanto and with me as my partner and why after . 2. his writings are john kerry worth and next to john is me right line of.

the. thank you very much you know your college to the 2nd panel which look. at the transparency and use of scientific studies and yes this month of life a seed in the united states and the hopefully will provide insight into the so-called monsanto papers thank you very much for inviting me to be here today as a journalist for some 30 years now i'm someone who has spent most of my life focusing on facts pursuing the truth i spent roughly 20 of those 30 years delving into the dealings of monsanto and i can confidently tell you that the story of the company's top selling chemical gleick to say is not one of truth but one of deceit

it's sort of a treasure trove a look inside a very big and powerful company that has been very secretive you know for decades and a lot of the information is quite alarming when it comes to public health and safety associated with the use of their popular product like to say to round up another way in which months and who has manipulated regulators in the public by establishing networks of scientists around the world to support its agenda and its message about the safety of this chemical months and no end or the months in a back like this a task force pays them they lobby regulators they author papers sensually to push this message that the chemical is safe there are many individuals and there are many types of different relationships that we've seen in these documents you can see here that professor david kirk a. as one such paid expert monsanto has relied on.

in 2012 months and was very worried about you know toxicity questions arising from life as a research gauge kirkland monsanto needed someone to help counter these concerns that were persisting what bill haden's wrote in that email i think i was just naive and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision we all have decades of experience in the industry and then a full week have reputations to maintain and that means that there is no point in us being responding to the influence of one stakeholder over another because those reputations would be destroyed i can say absolutely and categorically categorically

this paper was not ghost written we all imports our own sections to the paper there was no import involvement or influence of the review on months and thinking. well it seems apparent that monsanto actually fears real independent authentic science monsanto said itself it feared the i.r. preview when it found n n 2014 this is before that down before the classification monsanto says it fears this it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability in epidemiology toxicology geno talks and officials even predicted the glyphosate would warrant a possible or probable rating with respect to f.'s in echo. you know absence of process is defined as a peer review and i understand that and that's i. i don't have a problem with that peer review problem in this case is that's not was done nobody went back and verified the findings on the original studies and by failing to

verify those findings it cascaded through the entire review process such that you don't have the answer which is based on the best science i think that these important to mention that we have doing in the proper independent the sussman. accordingly we did so so that we have enough so according to the regulations that focus on the use of the active sessions and based on. the substance we got to be in the independence from industry is clear in the legislation i will say these 6 is the basic principle big company the ones to market something the you must pay for the assessment so the studies have conducted by industry there is no doubt the current process is scientifically flawed it is time to have an independent panel of scientists to evaluate the way in which the science is reviewed there is a need for the regulatory agencies to really analyze the data and there is a need to publicly publicly release all of the analyses and data to improve the

transparency of this process these are not the actions of a company that has nothing to hide this is not how you promote a product this is that's actually proven safe this is how you whitewash unfortunate and unprofitable facts. this is not by accident but by design and it serves monsanto very well but it does not seem that it serves the public interest thank you. monsanto prepared certain documents for the registration and the report if you look at it has taken directly certain language from the monsanto documents and just placed it in the report so there's a lot of concern about whether f they really did an independent analysis or whether they just took the position to be against. monsanto's request so that is not an independent assessment how can we therefore expect that on the basis of such robust

science and i'm quoting industry we can make a decision politicians in that you can make a decision to protect their people that if somebody. you know i said hello to the industry at some stage in his life that should not mean that that particular scientist should be banned from a panel or. research has been funded by someone many of the scientists that have a lot of them have now left the after organization and there are signs panels because they have been accused of having worked with the industry but for since when does that make a scientist dishonest why should having worked with the industry some years ago on a small project at some stage i did i'm a scientist by training and when i was in university of course i was looking for a grant to do my research because some research can cost a lot of money i was helped by industry i haven't spoken to that particular

industry now for many many years it's been a long time since i was in call it. but that doesn't mean i'm dishonest as a scientist. now you're against a region where inference is very high and those are regions look at europe for for regulation. and that's why it's so important that europe keeps the regulation which is scientific which is database and which as much as possible besides

without being influenced by. by i would say by militias or by just the emotions and fear. when science meets values and it's becoming complicated we come with science with evidence we do scientific process of risk assessment but then this evidence is given on another stage on the policy level where believes emotions values come in and what we see is if politicians don't like the outcome of our risk assessment they don't question their belief they question the validity of the process so basically if so comes with an opinion let's say it's insecticides.

politicians love if so they wonder food have so you're protecting the bees you're doing the right thing really good work than i have so we all applaud to you and if the same process with the same people with the same scrutiny comes with a conclusion let's say your life is it people say i'm sorry i don't like this outcome if so should not say that i have to say it is relatively safe so if so must be corrupt i find this very bizarre you know regulations is independent of corporate influence and. everything is tests that actually test it. with a lot of money and authorities are looking at it independently. i don't know where these people have been living. even in some of the mainstream you do

find reports that clearly explain that this is not happening we are seeing corporate capture not only in the sciences sciences is one of the fields we see corporate capture in every walk of life. i'd like to say it seems to be very highly charged not because of the safety of life but because of g.m. because of monsanto because of international trade maybe even because of inequality with global trade. and yes it's a must for health statistics each $22.00 for such a book about president obama done mocks from there from pick.

your expertise. searchin for mr van impe you for such for both good and. beloved. but of course if the scientists works for the company that's a different story but i think we need to be a little bit more. realistic about what it is we want do we want the best scientists to assess the products the gas to make sure they're safe all do we want to make sure there's no conflict of interest what is the objective is that the safety of the product because of the conflict of interests of the of the scientist i think we need to be a bit more. honest and trustworthy without falling into the mistakes so that's not something that we're looking for. the experts we use are as independent as possible but i think also here it's not black or white

it's not ciro or one that's not the binary approach we have to find the right balance between the best expertise which means people that have done research that people that are with both their feet in the scientific endeavor and on the other hand to make sure that there is no conflict of interest and if i may say also but i think europe needs to make a decision whether we know i think or stop you. yes i thought leads to follow. on of course but i think this time nothing on the from what you must buy they don't have the impulse to cut off he got there then besh one last time 101 telephone anything is a total of the bill is left on my shyness what i am plump and think is that i 100

buy in from here and last are going to you know one thing like that i live in nothingness when enough like on t.v. i press one of can often put a compliment to sell us but if we have like a machine in a panic button i'm into opium in a country. like auntie got a pension of kick out of a hunk in the home he hadn't of his that balance but if we. moved out of the. country that he got in that of the mother. so yes precautionary principle is and by scientific and he's i think. a big issue for european economy in general because it reduces. the willingness of investment. there is a risk in the. new presses and. this is a risk. this is

a benefit i'm i would need to take this risk yes or no and the regulation today. gives us an answer. if you look at the core of today it is much safer than the car yesterday you know the 1st car that i drove in when i was a boy and my father was writing no safety belt and i was no i had no air by going on new a.b.s. and and yet the a car maker was not murder. the car was like this. and it was a very safe car for the time and i'm not saying that betty says of 950. you know where fantasy but by then they were very good night and then we discover that they have some side effects and then the regulation evolves in regulation becomes more demanding and those crazy sides are banned or are withdrawn from the company and that's normal that's normal. of any industry the power of innovation doesn't come

from the big companies the big companies are too big to be innovative anymore they just want to preserve their privileges but they're not innovating anymore look at look at the g.m. and the pesticides we're dealing with g.m. plants that were developed 30 years ago nothing has changed it's another side resistance since the beginning it's all chemicals or something of asian. innovation is that we now have in addition to round up ready and run a business to plant we have become resistant plants and to for the resistant plants so we're getting an even more cocked toxic cocktail that's innovation. has to get it's just has to get. benefits versus risk right what is a risk you're willing to accept on the environment even if it's very small in order

to have a safe and affordable food supply. to me the defining battle in the future will also be around our crowfoot system if we manage to get our in my view dysfunctional agra food system. on a sound and vironment economic social and economic basis. then we solve everything else will come from. even climate change and these things health issues and marital issues social issues they're collateral they're all part of the of this whole thing that is connected and the connect the connecting center piece is its food. and how you produce it. because we see. the world as it is.

we are in fact and the border edge of the roof aleutian. because human kind is able to do it but much time that will take how much. misery. that will create i don't know but that's i'm only you know there is a french writer called peer harby he said this is a colibri affair so i'm just a little bird in the system doing my job as much as i can. in europe we're not going to give up when i open there are lots of other technology

and it's not just about g.m.o. there are lots of other technologies coming out and the companies are committed to invest in europe as well despite it being sold. uncomfortable is a euphemism going to work. for. well let's show you that cycle and spinning in the arabian sea rate now watch what it did to careless state in india $124.00 millimeters of rain in just 24 hours we show you where the disturbance is on sunday it's go as chance now to get 100 maybe 200 millimeters of rain and by monday i will be impacted 20000000 people in the line of fire with that cycle in there so that's what's going on toward the east now let's pull it back toward the west much calm conditions see in some sand and

dust kicked up across saudi arabia but plenty of forty's to be found big debt 43 doha 41 with plenty of sun on sunday i do want to take you to the mediterranean now where we are seeing some showers pivot in from greece into turkey so istanbul just some light showers in the forecast for you on sunday with a high of 23 degrees off to south africa we go and you know we did have some drenching rain on saturday that's now beginning to pull away from the western cape impacting the eastern cape cape town 17 degrees and this will give you some dry weather as we head toward monday so that will give a chance for water levels to come down durban just looking to have a mostly cloudy day in the forecast on monday with a high of 20. talk to al-jazeera we. were talking writing ago and now they're attacking everyone in

myanmar do you regret words like that we listen absolutely nigeria with a woman president it would be great we meet with global news makers and talk about the stories that matter on al-jazeera. the 1st european country to ban the food from his face in public places home to more than 6000000 followers of islam many who want to assert their religious and cultural identity in the light of france's 2021 contentious so-called separatism law as we look at the recent history of muslim immigration to the country in the final episode of this 3 part series it's muslims of from it's episode 3 which is the. growing dark and harsh and unforgiving circumstances children learn to play dangerous games they exist without studies that destroy the house and take worn down by frustration and broken promises young men living under the constant threat of imprisonment they took me to

the jeep and blindfolded me the time for them to regain control of their lives is when the boys returned prison life inside and out. on al-jazeera. so if you visit 5 as israel launches its most intensive air strikes from dollars or more than $150.00 raids in the early hours of sunday. this is al jazeera life and also coming up there is one ray of hope as a small child is pulled alive from the rubble of a gaza building that was destroyed.