in the mood and in the lab. now more than ever the world needs w h. making a healthy a world for you everyone the news. ready hello, i'm darin jordan and joe, with a quick reminder of the top stories here on algebra. israel bombardment of garza is now into the 11th day and only a s right on the outside, but neighborhood in western garza injured for children from the same family. but just hours ago, people living in 2 crowded residential neighborhoods were warned to leave. israel also hit southern garza, with more than a dozen strikes destroying 2 houses medic say one person was killed and 7 people

were wounded in the city of hon. eunice, in total, $228.00 palestinians have died since last week. 12 people have been killed in israel by palestinian rocket fire as well. several us democrats have back to resolution opposing the sale of $735000000.00 in military weapons to israel. pressures mounting from within the u. s. president's own party. so his administration to do more to end the violence, punish cast to reports now from washington, dc. in his 4th conversation with the israeli prime minister since the current violence began u. s. president joe biden said he expected a significant and immediate de escalation on a path to a cease fire. he was the most assertive language toward israel publicly used by the white house, but it was clearly rebuffed, as the bombardment of gaza continued. is really leadership understands that this is ultimately a bluff, that there's not going to be action put where there are only words and therefore they are create. they are completely free to carry on with their massive assault

against got the civilian population. that is absolutely devastating. the united states has so far resisted international pressure to drawing other world leaders in calling for an immediate cease fire. despite pressure also, building from within. in washington, liberal members of biden's own party urged the us to take a stronger stance. i believe we must stand in solidarity with those palestinians and israelis working to build a future of equality and peaceful co existence and not with the intolerant extremists on either side who wish to destroy that future. in this moment of crisis, the united states should be urging an immediate cease fire. a group of democratic members of congress introduced a house resolution calling for the us to hold the sale of 735000000 dollars in

guided missiles to israel representative rashid to leap, tweeted no more weapons to kill children and families, enough and representative alexandria casio cortez wrote, the united states should not be rubber stamping weapons sales to these rarely government as they deploy our resources to target international media outlets. schools, hospitals, humanitarian missions, and civilian sites for bombing, we have a responsibility to protect human rights. the resolution to block the arm sale to israel is non binding and unlikely to advancing congress where support for israel among republicans and many democrats remain strong. but among liberals, the growing sense that is real should be held to account, and us support cannot be unconditional. heidi jo, castro al jazeera washington to albany, is now iran, deputy foreign minister says,

talks to salvage the 2015 nuclear deal and bring the us back to the table. have progressed well in vienna, under the agreement, iran restricted its nuclear program and exchange for sanctions relief. its repeatedly breached the terms the deals since donald trump pull the us out in 2018 . washington says it's, we're to lift some sanctions, but tara says it won't join until all of them are removed. the number of current virus denson india, has fallen off the 2 days in a row of record highs. at least 3800 people died in the past 24 hours. but the number of new infection just slightly up. 287000 cases were reported on thursday. your opinion in these travel restrictions, the tourists are fully vaccinated. bastards of also agreed on relaxing the criteria for countries to be considered safe until now that list included on the 7 nations. those were the headlines. the news continue to analysis era after the price of progress and statement. that's the watching. ah,

ah, we live in a world where industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put their products on the market. the we need a regulation,

so we don't do crazy things because maybe sometimes with credit things i don't know, but accept that we have regulation. we want regulation as industry and if we don't behave then yes, penalty that's fine. ah, i always say the, the industry makes money. of course it does. if the industry did not make money, how many people will be at work? i more sort of the left answer and the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedent. corporate interest, corporate profits have been getting priority with a regulator, so that needs to change. and one of the big ways to do that is just require transparency. ah, we, we love transparency. we would like to publish everything we use it's just not

allowed. and we as if they cannot say, we don't care, there's intellectual property rights, but we are, if we publish everything, it will just be breaking the law. ah, they prefer intellectual property to the health of children. i. if you make money out of selling pesticide, how much incentive does these companies do these companies have to get a pesticide? will they make sure that we get use less pesticides or will they make sure that we use always more pesticides? the goal today industry prefers to spend millions of euros in lobbying to the regulations instead of researching, substitute, and how to make this thing differently. it's

in the industries interest to bring food to the table that is safe. that is high quality. that is reasonably priced. so that you and i and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good nutrition food every day. as i progress he goes risk, you are referring to to accidents, industrial incident. so i see there are people who are injured to people who die every time this happens for industry in general. it would defeat ah, however, those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to progress. and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefits. ah, what is progress?

a progress moving forward, whatever. and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but because we know how to do something, it's useful and that it's good for the people. we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progress is. i don't think that progress is ruining the future generation by using tons of chemicals that that can, that can create. and he's come to college who's 20 years old? oh i use, ah,

in lieu if we were today with the principal problem, you will not have emily's enemies will not exist because an airplane sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 506-0000 people die with automobile accident. so precautionary principle i think, is a disaster. and yet, what we are now more and more advocating. and you apply these to agriculture. we are farming in europe with less substances than north americans or south america

with less tools. you know, because we don't use gamers, we don't use technology. i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not. and in europe, we have this romantic idea of follow business people. they would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need that just business people and we should get them to the business. and we can't expect them to act in any other way except

the only way that would change is if there is a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business. and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat food like a global commodity, we have a very big problem. the and part of that problem is the food will go to the highest bidder. and the highest bidder may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bidder. maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food. the

aggravation is all about making money. making profit. it's a big corporation. it's about formative big uniform lens with one group, maximum. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also economically it's about international markets import export until about companies consoling in far away places. lance, to export commodities is not about food production is not about feeding people the industrial agriculture is

a form of mining and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses and most of the uses go into animal food and textiles. fiber fuel, whatever you have the, the rest of it can be so more expensive to some other use. it will go into processed in food processing. so it's food, a necessity, always food, a business transaction, food of both. yeah. so we all need to eat that for sure. but in europe we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in europe hundreds of years, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one tomato

a new month. but we have tend to want, doesn't really matter to us if we have a gym or tomato. and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food, no a days. this is a big confusion between what is the general interest and the interest of industry. because the priorities jobs and growth, and it's like growth in drugs are more important than people like the food industry is successful, it will create more jobs. it will create more value added, it will create more growth. so i don't see why. we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry, but this should be a communal fight. me. modern agriculture relies on satellites relies on precision farming,

which is the connection between satellites digital machinery and then all of the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as food production in agriculture because of an overly conservative restrictive regulation and the tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what understood in the all i think europe has a best potential to be the leading agricultural region in the world, we should be the ones who is the best jobs and most invest in hybridization,

generic expect the sides chemicals machinery. we should be because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to it's much what we want to see is something very different. it's a model built on diversity on biological diversity that is, you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations, do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfigure it together? how we operate on this planet? we will make ourselves obsolete that's defined when we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they have to be then assistant to our goals. well, many people,

if i say that would say yes, yes, of course. make sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment on our foot systems that operates within the planetary boundaries as scientists. so it's been defined where it respects the rules of the planet and not vice versa. that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms. what progress do we want? are we willing to trade of some of the benefits for some of the risk?

because we're facing a world which is more and more globalized? so we are up against other parts of the world which do not always play with the same rules. there are geo political issues and part of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the world, either to aid or to producing themselves, and to produce more food on the same amount of land. because we can't use more land because she has more resources, all as or

less one see either the momentum. simply the command on much trouble. yes, if you could only come in a scene new to the militia, they don't allow us to plug a scholar game, but we will be in doubt. you may recall do you imagine the number of the diseases that are in every family today? it's, you know, due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all breast cancer phones . that's not true. so it is due to environment and to chronic poisons

that are in the environment. what are the chronic poisons designed to be toxic initially and spread all over the place to go it up yesterday hid it will cause his mom. i don't need our dish into you're trying you're continuing enough but now mama can live in and also medical. know what i said mother yoda s credited communion. cars for the mama in for you may just asking me dumber tolls for my vehicle to kinda put to understand either i in deficit. they basically got toxic course. so look, public

a media blue down i they don't know. commit them was 11. they're usually induced to be a part of my game based figures over less government. but you know, i never use list hit the market. it got out of the natal. ah, i know the other gotten, the other stuff just kept within the year. there's a co pay didn't mean you're located, gone may be the baby. don't wish that total of being a control more focus and stuff. yes, but loss control is decision, doxey gosh, but a lot of april fionn by the system. ramona can city fitness i stuck in on peace.

have such pictures east of saturday? well then by suddenly us from the know the say no, i cannot. she's not to put on the limit. there must be murder she'll. she'll deal if you will give him a note to get under me . all he's taken to the brutal seem to be running into marketing as you did for me in 2 for the maybe she a scene for what he does, he does, he will, she did, but a loss he had to get into the kitchen on the team. go, he could provide him into competing, make him a kimono, mac. everybody had me more or less. however, if you need to model it and audio must. milton, if you can let me know and be tentative later lunch hour p document tomorrow. no.

i bought a conflict of cds on it, but kaloni got it was already gated ross a in limited. she's in the real world but our competitors in the middle and he does indeed. what do you know? a lot of the media know we're going to do the portable, she lost my daughter, she's a black eagle my lot to see though the law in what i see only not have to in the conflict oper, florals canoe not last say that the while he will model, see if you know, i don't remember either yet many

of the opponents to modern agriculture have understood that it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to, to use fear as a strong emotional driver for a change in policy and for influencing policy. but sometimes it's in the interests of the anti industry groups to do that, of course, because it keeps them at work brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes i visit from them recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and through menu or, and threatening letters and stuff. but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fight against when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that we have both an arrows and they have atom bombs. as soon as there's an end geo,

or group of people who are against something, maybe maybe they banish, maybe they stop using it, maybe of importing. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region. when i say industry has the truth, we know what's in our product, for example, like that. if i, if i make a product, i mean, you can go home this evening and make a buy area in your kitchen. and you know what's in there and you write it down, that is the truth. sorry, but you know, we are an industry, we know what we're pushing our products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we put in our product. when i say we have the truth, i'm talking about not talking by philosophically the truth, i'm talking about what we do, we know what we do and we can talk about it the

know can't, don't cover you don't domain delivery assumed as if it's or less than the 50 seed this was yeah, they put it out in the hot have her the book, her lives under cl, done. it was one of those he battled on mon acre and he's a house for a demo. the value as show me and elisa does. she does her new buying sample of cad, you can see for 50 seed do more on the way down on a glass. well, now we don't a violence and i was waiting on your, in the, on the the bo say most, i think you hit those hear me luck. hope was younger. plenty, early coffee yet look, well now i'm poetry, coffee down here. it is. if it's something coffee, nancy and for

a community chance, if he poor look them up for a consummate that not so to cook and it could be a sudden i live saw one of the, our physicians on those tale. you don't these as a school confusion or something for me. so i did have a family ma santo paper all me i covered 19 has compounded the homelessness crisis and abandoned impoverished families of force and radical jane. he decided to say, hey, we're going to spend the human rights by claiming property left vacant by the state

. the 1st thing i did was i change my duty and my daughter safe. that means breaking the law that i'm willing to do that for shelter in place. and a fight for housing analogy 0. the world of high frequency share trading, exposed. i had this engine that was basically trading. i couldn't last. $30000000.00 was a terrifying experience. artificial intelligence as rates for stakes and risks on the money market. there's markets go faster, faster, we're opening up the possibility for an instability for no, no useful money bought on our job here. bitcoin block chain and crypto currencies, disruptive technology, all the way to a fair, a financial system. and you have mining women in your house and they will conference again if they find it. award winning filmmaker at austin hoffman looked at all sides of the complex crypto allowed to film. in

a utopian dream of bypassing the international banking was just as easily manipulated as today's financial system crypto be coming soon on, jazeera like the darn job in the top stone. his hair on his era, israel bombardment of guns as into its 11th day and earlier, as strike on the outside neighbourhood in western gaza, entered 4 children from the same family just hours ago. people living in 2 crowded neighborhoods were willing to leave their homes. israel also hit southern garza, with more than a dozen strikes destroying 2 houses medic say, one person was killed and 7 wounded in the city of hon. eunice, and total $228.00 palestinians have died since last week. 12 people have been killed in israel by palestinian rocket fire while both sides publicly,

se they'll fight on secret, told us had to be under way. phone call us president joe biden has told israel prime minister to lower the intensity of the conflict. but benjamin netanyahu says israel campaign will go on until it's objective them that results on the board. but with every passing day, we are striking at more of the terrorist organizations capabilities targeting more senior command is toppling more terrorist buildings and hitting more weapons stockpiles. just as i told the ambassadors here today, this is the natural rise of israel. i very much appreciate the support of these governments, and i especially appreciate the support of a friend us president biden, for the state of israel bride to self defense. i'm determined to continue this operation until its objective is achieved to restore quiet and security to you. citizens of israel, several years democrats of back to resolution, opposing the sale of $735000000.00 in military weapons to israel. precious mounting

from within the us president and party for his administration to do more to end the violence. another news, iran, deputy foreign minister says talks to salvage the 2015 nuclear deal and bring the us back to the table. have progressed well in vienna. under the agreement, iran restricted its nuclear programs and exchange for functions relief. washington says it's ready to lift some sanctions. a tariff says it when rejoined, until all of them are removed. a number of current of virus death in india has fallen after 2 days in a row of record highs. at least 3800 people died in the past 24 hours. but the number of new infections is slightly up and the european union is easing travel restrictions for tourists who are fully vaccinated in buffalo. they've also agreed and relaxing the criteria, a countries to be considered safe. so those were the headlines and continued your knowledge of era after the price to progress efficient and so much and bye for now . the

news news news news with me. ah ah

oh no. that is that companies have to submit studies to european commission. they do the study themselves, they have to submit it to the european commission and to so the european food safety authority. and they have a panel of experts that looks at the studies and then they say ok, safe or not. so what we have found is that within the expert panel, she has a lot of people with dice with the food industry. so that means a conflict of interest. ah, so if someone wants to authorize a product in europe,

let's say a plan protection product. this person, because this person or this company, the applicant, has to provide data that allows us, as the risk assessors to judge whether this product is safe or not. and this information comes from the applicant and the studies that are commissioned by the applicant to allow us to assess the safety are paid by the applicant, obviously. so it's the intellectual property of the applicant. and we can publish parts of the studies in the current legal framework, but we also have to respect the business confidentiality claims of the applicants. so there is a balance to be found between transparency as much as possible, but also to predict the investment of companies into their product innovation.

exactly like in the middle ages, you were asking to the priest, what is a truth in? no, you ask to these scientists and regulatory agencies. what is the truth and they act in the same manner as magician. you know, because they work on secret compounds. we secret effects. they say that you cannot publish that. however, they said they had the truth i if you spend a huge amount of money doing study a study or something where there's a lot of confidential information there that you don't want. another company to copy paste, of course not. i mean, you might have spent years a lot of resources. so people time a lot of time and money on doing this research at what after does is it i'm relies

with all of that to publish the results. so it will publish, it will come out with the statement at the end and it will publish the results, but it will publish all the details and what a lot of people don't see because there are people for a relative eyes all because that's actually a lot of people, but some people want to see everything. that's fine. i think now it's actually all been published. but you're talking about several 1000 pages. i don't know who in his white mind would sit down and read through all of those pages. i think some parts can be blacked out, but i would insist that that's to do with privacy. so the relationship between all companies and research institute and universities is quite strong. as i mentioned before, in many parts of the world, it tends to be the public sector developing the products, thanks to relationship with the company. maybe the company donated the technology. the problem in europe, for example, is that in f, so that you mentioned before,

they have scientists assessing the products. and the scientists have a obligation to have no conflict of interest. that means they have to have, have no relationship whatsoever with industry ever. so if you are a scientists in europe, having a, any kind of dealing with a company close at the number of avenues of work later. so again, we are really champions and creating difficulties for ourselves in europe, but the rest of the world is sitting around or jo howling towards from santo and with me is my partner, eric lasker, and to his right is john kayla. and next to john is mimi line line am

i i thank you very much for your correlation to the 2nd panel, which will look at the transparency and use of scientific studies. and one of life i said in the united states and hopefully will provide insight into the so called montana papers. thank you very much for inviting me to be here today as a journalist for some 30 years now. i'm someone who has spent most of my life focusing on facts pursuing the truth. i spent roughly 20 of those 30 years delving into the dealings of monsanto and i can confidently tell you that the story of the company's top selling chemical life. the state is not one of truth,

but one of deceit. it's sort of a treasure trove, or look inside a very big and powerful company that has been very secretive for decades. and a lot of the information is quite alarming when it comes to public health and safety associated with the use of their popular product life and state and round up . another way in which montana has manipulated regulators and the public is by establishing networks of scientists around the world to support its agenda. and it's message about the safety of the chemical, monsanto and, or the monsanto back like this. a task force pays them the lobby regulators. they author papers, essentially to push this message that the chemical is safe. there are many individuals and there are many types of different relationships that we've seen in these documents. you can see here that professor david is one such paid, expert montana was relied on

in 2012. my son was very worried about gene toxicity. questions arising from glad to say research when it engaged, kirkland, monsanto needed someone to help counter these concerns that were persisting. what bill hayden's wrote in the email, i think i was just naive and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision. we all have decades of experience in the industry and therefore we have reputations to maintain. and that means that there is no point in us being or responding to the influence of one stakeholder over another because those reputations would be destroyed, i can say absolutely. and categorically, categorically this paper was not ghost written,

we all import our own sections to the paper. there was no input involvement or influence of the review by monsanto. thinking care. well, it seems apparent, the monsanto actually fears real independent, authentic science, montana said itself, it feared the i our review when it found in in 2014, this is before i sat down before the classification. monsanto says that fears this, it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability and epidemiology toxicology, geno talks, montana officials even predicted the glad to state would warrant a possible or probable rating with respect to ethan echo, you know, as a process is defined as a peer review, and i understand that and that don't have a problem with that peer review problem in this case, is that not was, was done. nobody went back and verified the findings on the original studies. and

by failing to verify those findings, it cascaded through the entire review process, such that you don't have the answer which is based on the best science, hasn't the important to mention that we are doing the proper independent assessment according with the resources that we have enough so according to the regulation that focus on the use of the 2nd and based on that we generate the risk assessments regarding the independence from industry is clearing the legislation. i will say the say is the basic principle, the company that wants to market something the you must pay for the assessment. so this by the 2nd, the by industry, there is no doubt. the current process is scientifically flawed. it is time to have an independent panel of scientists evaluate the way in which the science is reviewed. there's a need for the regulatory agencies to re analyze the data. and there is a need to publish, publicly released all of the analyses and data to improve the transparency of this

process. these are not the actions of a company that has nothing to hide. this is not how you promote a product. this is, that's actually proven safe. this is how you whitewash unfortunate and unprofitable facts. this is not by accident, but by design. and it serves monsanto very well, but it does not seem that it serves the public interest. thank you. the monsanto prepared certain documents for the registration and the report if you look at it, has taken directly certain language from the monsanto documents and just placed it in the report. so there's a lot of concern about whether after i really did an independent analysis or whether they just took the position to be against i arc at monsanto's request. so that is not an independent assessment. how can we therefore expect that on the basis of such robust scions and i'm quoting industry, we can make

a decision. politicians in the you can make a decision to protect that people. that if somebody has said hello to the industry at some stage in his life, that should not mean that that particular scientist should be banned from a panel or research has been funded somewhere by someone. many of the scientists that have a lot of them have now left the organization and their science panels because they have been accused of having worked with the industry but within plan. does that make a scientists dishonest? why should having worked with the industry some years ago on a small project? at some stage i did, i'm a scientist by training. and when i was in university, of course, i was looking for a grant to do my research. because some research can cost a lot of money. i was helped by industry. i haven't spoken to that particular

industry now for many, many years. it's been a long time since i was in college. but that doesn't mean i'm dishonest, as a scientist. ah ah no europe tends to be in the region where influences very high and also regions look at europe for, for regulation. and that's why it's so important that europe keeps regulation which is scientific, which is database in which as much as possible decides

result being influenced by by i would say by noise or by just emotions and fear when science me values that it's becoming complicated. we come with science with evidence we do and scientific process of risk assessment, but then this evidence is given on another stage. on the policy level, there believes emotions values come in. and what we see is if politicians don't like the outcome of our risk assessment, they don't question their belief. they question the validity of the process. so basically if it's a comes with an opinion, let's say on the, on the continuance insecticides politicians love if so they want the food.

so you are protecting the bees, you're doing the right thing. really good to act on there. so we all applaud to you, and if the same process with the same people, we use the same scrutiny comes with the conclusion. let's say i'm glad for said people say, i'm sorry, i don't like this outcome. if there should not say that dr to say this relatively safe. so if so must be corrupt. i find this very bizarre, you know, regulations is independent of corporate influence and, and it's everything is tested actually tested and with a lot of money and our authorities are looking at it independently. i don't know where these people have been living even in some of the mainstream journals,

you do find reports that clearly explain that this is not happening. we are seeing corporate capture not only in the sciences it sciences is one of the fields we see corporate capturing in every walk of like me, oh i i'd like to say seems to be very highly charged. not because of the safety of clients say, but because of gm, because of monsanto, because of international trade, maybe even because of inequality with global traits. superchargers, my son, anger said too much for calling to see when cooper starts both out and in a 1000000 remarks. son, martin luther direct list of people, soccer balls,

district is a $1000000.00. fill out me . of course, if the scientist works for the company, that's a different story. but i think we need to be a little bit more realistic about what it is we want. do we want the best scientists to assess the products the get to make sure they're safe? or do we want to make sure there's no conflict of interest? what is the objective is the safety of the product because of the conflict of interest of the, of the scientist. i think we need to be a bit more honest and trustworthy without falling into the mistake says. so that's not something that we're looking for. the, the, the experts we use are as independent as possible, but i think also here it's not black or white. it's not serial or one that's not

a digital binary approach. we have to find the right balance between the best expertise which mean people that have done research, the people that are with both their feet in, in the scientific endeavor. and on the other hand, to make sure that there is no conflict of interest. and if i may say also be i think europe needs to make a decision whether we know i think i stop here. yes, i don't lead too far. oh, i much. well, they shook up their baton as a $120.00 for a total of them. the village left almost this unit, but

a lot of stuff that i 100 by the in fluid and last are going to, you know, one thing that i live in a funeral need, like a little less, but i feel like abandoned, but i'm in total bill can travel i can see that when i get enough of dollars, but if it is not, can that money that i would me so yes, precautionary principle is anti scientific and it is, i think, a big issue for europe and economy in general because it reduces the willingness of an investment. there is a risk in registering a new purchase. this is a risk. this is

a benefit. am i willing to take this risk? yes or no? and the regulation today gives us an answer. me, if you look at the car of today, it is much safer than the car yesterday. you know, the 1st car that i drove in when i was a boy and my father was writing, had no safety belt. and i had no airbag and how no abs and and yet z a call maker was not a murderer. it is a car was exist and it was a very safe car for the time. and i'm the things idea of bessie says of 950. you know where fantastic, but by then there were very with bessy side and then we discover that they have some side effects and then the regulation evolves and regulation becomes more demanding. and especially sides are bond or are withdrawn from the company. and that's no more, that's normal erosion of any industry. the power of innovation doesn't come from

the big companies. the big companies are too big to be innovative anymore. they just want to preserve that privilege as, but they're not innovating anymore. or it look at, look at the the d m and the pesticides were dealing with g m plants that were developed 30 years ago. nothing has changed. it's b, g, and other side resistance. since the beginning, it's old chemical partial innovation in the innovation is that we now have in addition to round, ready and rounded resist implants, we have become resistant plans and to, for the resistant place. so we're getting an even more cocked toxic cocktail. those that innovation has to get out and it just has to get out benefit versus risk, right? what is a ratio willing to accept on the arm and even if it's very small in order to have

a safe and food supply, ah, to me, the defining factor in the future will also be around our food system. if we manage to get our, in my view dysfunctional agrifood system on a sound, environmental, economic, social, and economic basis, then we solve everything else will come from it. even climate change in these things, health issues and are mental issues, social issues. 3rd collateral, they're all part of, of the whole thing that is connected. and the connect, the connecting center piece is food and how you produces, ah, ah, because we see the world as it is we

are in fact at the border edge of the revolution. because human kind is able to do it, but how much time that will take, how much misery that will create. i don't know, but that's i'm only, you know, there is a french writer called pier hobby. he said this is a collie bree affair. so i'm just a little bird in the system doing my job as much as i can. i know we're not going to give off when there are lots of other technology and it's

not just about jim or not about margie coming up. and the companies are committed to invest in europe as well, despite it being so uncomfortable is a euphemism to work. if i the hello hut and sammy pretty much sums up the weather across the middle east at the moment as it should do, said lassie quiet we got to the mountain with a ration, of course, on the other side of the radiant se, just pushing out across northwestern areas of india, but badly a cloud in the sky, lots of hazy sunshine, and it's very hot sunshine as well. so we're getting into the mid forty's. the fact that for q 8 and here in dough hon. a similar picture as we go on into fried ice are not too much in the way of any cloud on the horizon for us. we'll see some wet weather to northern parts of africa. storm pushing up to 2 minutes time. one or 2

when she shouts, but even these are in the process of diminishing fight and try to cross the horn of africa. one or 2 she was into the opium highlands, salsa dancing, some showers to be some showers. of course, cross central african republic rado over towards the gulf with guinea. see some wet weather coming in here. but south of that it is lossy fine. and dry loss of sunshine coming through. right down into south africa, at least for the time being a little more cloud just coming into the western cape as we go on through thursday . and that wet weather will make its way. across the western side of south africa, the southern cape sinks in wet weather portal isabel around 24 degrees for thursday afternoon. cool, wet weather setting in for friday and saturday. ah, killing the debates. don't leave the picture and amplify your voice. there are only

given a certain narrative, the media will miss the true story know topic it of the table. why in the world, what do we humanize an individual domestic care? this was an illegal occupation of a country. what they're doing is they're removing knowledge at the store for vision at the, the stream where a global audience becomes a global community. on our, for decades, criminals made millions, trafficking drugs to thailand. 11 east explores where the country has now become the 1st in southeast asia to legalize medical marijuana. on al jazeera, a lot of the stories that we cover a highly complex. so it's very important that we make them as understandable as we can to as many people as possible, no matter how much they know about a given crisis or issue. in this area, the smell of death is overpowering. as you say, recall respondents, that's what we strive to do me play an important role. protecting human client.

ah, ah ah ah, the whole neighborhoods in garza are evacuated as israel bombings enter an 11th day . but the diplomatic efforts during the violence of attempt bye to the german foreign minister isn't israel hours before a meeting of the un general assembly? ah, no one can maria here and go home for now just.