though all getting over excited, no longer being forced to watch that scene from afar. a year ago holding the champions league final with friends was simply impossible. this year most of those empty seats of the study drug out will still be empty. but those are all filled, could be a test of how soon football really can get back to normal. polaris outages era porter, i was out there are, these are all top stories. mcconnell who led a military coup in molly this week while serving as vice president, as now being declared interim presidents by the constitutional court. a theme going out to the president and prime minister. all 3 were part of another coo last august . nicholas hart cost more from bama co. this was a long time come in since the detention of the presidents of transition. on monday it was clear that any veil or resemblance of

a civil lead government of transition was gone. that the real strong amount of molly is a see me going to. so this comes as no surprise it in the run up to this. and now it's made made by the constitutional court. well as see me going to has been meeting leaders, religious leaders, union leaders, the opposition really trying to rallying to his cause, meaning that there was no real surprise when this constitutional court announcement was made the remains of 215 children have been found at a site of a former school for indigenous children in western canada, least a 150000 digit children attended so called residential schools. between the 18 forties and 19 nineties, many were forcibly taken from their families. germany has acknowledged it committed genocide in namibia, in the early 20th century, germans at the forces killed tens of thousands of indigenous herrera,

a number of people after an uprising against colonial rule. after 5 years of towards berlin ruled out reparations, but agreed to provide $1300000000.00 in aid for development projects. republicans in the us senate derails and inquiry into the attack on capitol hill by donald trump forces. democrats had wanted to set up a commission looking into the events leading up to the right. 54 sentences voted in favor short of the 60 needed to advance the legislation and was ready forces have killed a palestinian man in the occupied westbank. that korea miguel was short and later died from his injuries in a hospital near nablus. these 22 others were wounded and followed confrontations between palestinian protesters and israeli police in the village of beta demonstrates as rallied against the new israeli illegal settlements. those are headlines to draw his era. it's next. they with us is a very bleak picture for

a lot of americans out there. life supremacy. in fact, all of our, if you're putting more money into the hands, with some workers taking money out of the hands of other workers, everyone goes to their campus and it becomes the us versus down. this is a deal about constraining a nuclear program. the bottom line off, the big question oh, now to 0, with the israel's offensive in garza cause widespread death and injury the un secretary general, antonio terrorists called for an immediate cease fire. but israel catholic, a prime minister benjamin netanyahu insisted that the offensive would go on as long as necessary. wild lead is expressed that concerns pocket some prominent and demanding a c 5. the un general assembly held an emergency session and focused on foreign minister sharma, cray. she was there looking for consensus to put an end to what he called the atrocities in palestine. but what role does pockets don't play given the

geopolitical dynamics and some of its key muslim allies normalize relations with israel? pocket stones, foreign minister shop grey, she talks to al jazeera ah child, i would creation foreign minister of focused on thank you for talking to al jazeera . how would you characterize israel's actions in gaza over the last weeks back in human encore for the excessive use of force on the 27th of ramadan. you know, packing exxon mosque was unacceptable. and that triggered off the crisis minister. what's your reaction to news of a c, so i haven't been reached. i'm very happy about the news. i hope it holds boss.

experience shows that it did not hold in 2014, but i hope it holds. is there any indication as to what? what suddenly transpired there to make israel realized that it couldn't go on, i think, but the question was building up public pressure was building up all of the world and the lives that they were losing the media wall. nobody expected such a shop people's reaction. the government responded later. the people reacted 1st at this is the qualitative change. one. i think israel was not him expecting the reaction within the mix. cities in his right, you know, better citizens, arabs use it all up, confronting each other in his right. that is a new and precedent to development as part of your efforts here at the you and in

new york that you did convene a meeting of the organization of islamic corporation. and you said in the speech that the you said before that the muslim, almost must defend the palestinians. i'm curious, they're members of the, oh i see include sir don, morocco the you a he, bahrain who will normalize their relationships with israel under the abraham because they feel the same way. do they feel that the palestinians deserve to be defended anymore? be justified it that this was a step towards peace, normalization. and the israeli reaction, ah, i would think would somewhat disappoint them. was there any indication of that in the me? i know they sent envoys. they went terrible if the gauge, the sentiment within their countries. st. sentiment they will realize that

people are disappointed, but you said that the power steering issue had gone on the back burner. you can get a better example than than these, these nations normalizing relations. do you think anything has changed now or will we be back in the same situation as we were before? and i think time israel will do the same thing it'll, it'll move the grass once again. you cannot shove the palestinian question under the carpet for too long it'll resurface. you can look the other way, but then it's simulink. well, that brings us neatly on to the biden administration's reaction to the bottom. and how do you, how do you assess washington's reaction to, to be really killing of hundreds of civilians. and i think they were slow, they should have reacted and acted speedily and they could have save some lives.

this isn't a decision which is very experience. administration v foreign policy. so one expected a quicker response. this delayed response, subtle, gave an impression that they were not prepared to deal with a situation like this. but isn't it precise you had experienced that suggests. this wasn't being caught unaware. this was a very calculated delay, a great calculated response. i mean, obama did the same thing. of course, let, let israel do whatever it has to do, kill as many people as it has to. and then obama will eventually, he eventually would then say. so then, then yes, democratic party as always. right. so, you know, spoken about human rights. well, as we said, that might be foreign policy would have, would have human rights at the center and use sol. how into dr. law

at mad at dad in law was being lived it. ah, so with this good news, i think attention will now focus on the human rights gotten so i hope, i hope democracies in the west do not overlook the human issue. that's precisely what joe biden did, and as you said, with a great deal of experience, which suggested a great deal of calculation, that if things did deteriorating them, at least that was going to be his position based on his experience. his been decades in congress no matter the humiliation. once again, benjamin at yahoo! the day after bite nostra deescalate, can escalate the humiliation he's prepared to go through that because he feels it's necessary. this is calculated, surely this wasn't just being who i would say that perhaps they were trying and perhaps i have no inside intimation. i'm just a guessing perhaps up promise to nathan,

yahoo was being politics you know, ah, to regain last political ground. and for that, he had to show flex muscle. he had to shore to his electorate, that is a strong man. he means business or biden was prepared to sacrifice his standing in the world in order to know perhaps they kept trying. the patch kept trying, and the engagement that had betrayed the safety, blinking, he did tell me that an extensive diplomatic effort was under way. so what were they going to say? i mean, a few weeks ago, anthony, blinking feds that human rights would be the centerpiece of american foreign policy . that's completely and tap in years. but then now it's time for them to demonstrate and show the world that they believe in human rights. but surely the

lesson is here that there is a ruthlessness in biden's foreign policy approach, which is once he's made up his mind that israel is the ally in the region that the u. s. doesn't want to get involved in another middle east conflict. he'll stick to it, it's fine if hundreds of men, women, and children up killed in their beds in gaza, it's a price that he feels is worth paying them and that she's a ruthlessness and is the push is the us cannot remain a different they are a global paul, you know, they cannot look the other way. they have responsibilities, and many americans who feed in a particular way. if they did not, you won't have seen the demonstrations peaceful demonstrations in chicago in michigan and other us towns. i suppose where this is leading as far as pakistan is concerned. and as we look at our biden foreign policy agenda, is, is the suggest something that that i glean for was once biden's mind is made up

even if it's only the short term until his mind changes again. but once he's dismissed country or people, he'll have no qualms about sacrificing population clearly. and i say this in the, in the context of pakistan because it's been very clear since biden was inaugurated . but he doesn't seem to have time for pakistan. there's been no phone call to iran con. there are summits which pakistan's neighbors are invited to the climate change summit focused on his involve even their pockets done in such a crucial part of the climate. discussion. envoys go to the region all the time. they don't stop in pakistan. does that concern point point understood point well made. but the question is, should the do that and can they afford to ignore buck us, bob? look at the size of the country. look at the queue strategic location of the country. right? look at the presence of pakistan, but then duma right. look at the history that box fan has had with us.

we've been friends and allies in difficult time, so that's not how they fit towards going to be a bomber administrator until you they just will. you as sheltering the hall county network and the place where someone was having a limit, well, look at the look at the need for pakistan, for peace and stability. and a lot of fun. is that over? not yet? not yet, but then why do you think the vitamin assertion is acting in this way, given the historical role of focused on in, in theaters that are so crucial to speak for the you must have a hunch. i hope they realize the importance of boxes fun and i'm sure they have found new friends in the region. but why lose all ones? in fact, and in the public pronouncements on afghanistan, they always seem to emphasize, focused on as one of several nations with

a stake in the future. i've got this done the way that we mention china, india, iran, russia, and pockets on whereas, perhaps before, there was a sense of focused on cryptogenic, which is probably just like is okay with us because we've always advocated that of on his thought is a shared responsibility you know, you cannot just focus on pockets on if things go wrong and you hold pockets on this, once will know we have played our part. we will continue to play apart, were peace and stability. but it's a shared responsibility. we cannot be held responsible if there are internal squabbling, is going to find a stop. if there is an in fight, you know, a pass struggle going on and a lot of on what we are saying is, we seriously with sincerity. want to see peace and stability and want to start because we need better fish these off on a sob if any country benefits from peace. and

a lot of song spoke about how crucial was focused on and getting to talk about to, to agree to the, to the piece deal in the 1st place. i'm getting the tyler bonds negotiate well. you can ask and better cleans up the road blockers on played. he has publicly acknowledged deconstructive role, the positive role of pockets on his plate in getting the thought a bond to dig into who shooting table in pushing the peaceful process forward in getting a peace agreement between the taliban and the us. the doha. be se, agreement in getting the piece entrap can't be stalks started in building a consensus for the rules and procedures of engagement and still trying to break the stalemate that exists at the moment. how would you characterize pocket stones relationship with taliban? there is that sense. we're focused on no longer has any you opperation or

involvement with the, with the taliban strategic depth houses as focused on used to good. so what were you just like trusted advisors? i mean, there's a sense of a taliban is going more pragmatic itself is what she was able to learn over the years. one thing i think that thought a bon and the government has relies or should realize that the people on his phone the all the very mean majority once be se raglin. the policy now give it was focused on was actively preventing the afghan government and functioning with its sponsorship off of the tell about that. does that sense that that's that relation to change? how, how, how, how will we stopping the southern country that i've been in countries the take the own decisions and we have a very clear policy of non defense. we have learned over the years and we

do not want to meddle in that internal affairs. what we are saying is we will be honest brokers. you would be facilitators, and that's it. would you think it's because of pakistan's weakened influence over the taliban? that the washington doesn't seem to need you anymore? perhaps you don't have the influence. i mean, you counselor, when either you do or you are having an operational role with the taliban, in which case you're a nefarious actor or you don't have an operational incidence or the taliban in which case you are irrelevant to washington house. pockets on will never be irrelevant. mark my words, we will never be irrelevant. if you look at the regional picture. if you look at the new global challenges in the making box and will always remain relevant and you do get the sense, i think you hinted at this earlier there that if the taliban does renege on the deal, as i'm about might be blamed actually, even though it's all quiet now. well,

it's easy, it's convenient to make people a pastor buck. but the fact of the matter is we have in all the interactions we've had to thought about. we've gotten good. we have told them that they have gained respectability by, by engaging we have told them of hannah found is different in the last 2 decades. it has changed. you know, you cannot live in the past except new realities and on and, and, and basically it's your country, but have to reconcile, let's talk of to taliban and india, putting feelers out with each other that must concern you there. sure. if it's all about his taking you at its word and so was, there was nothing there was any suggestion to the taliban is looking at the new reality about gallons down, which means that it might have to have a relationship with india and other nations. once the u. s. on and you see on the

sun is a solid country and they have every right to have relations with india and they've had relations with india. and we have no, we have no issue with that. what we are saying is, and we are not even objective in the playing a post conflict, constructive rule and reconstruction in rebuilding militia. with that. what we have said is they have their limitations, these of the piece process because they do not have, they're not immediate neighbors. of a lot of fun. they do not have 3000000 refugees, a living in their country. we do. we do the world. it's forgotten them. but we are living them. but your total of afghan is down as a sovereign country, but water will be is a country which the u. s. will continue to bomb it will and surely i've got to start will go back to the situation. it's also had in the past of

a great deal of jostling of a great power competition. and in this case now china, india, russia, iran. but finally august on finally of allison is one area where all the big players have a consensus. china, russia, european union, the us there is a convergence on a lot of sun. they could have differences and other areas, but here, fortunately, that is a convergence. and he's interesting, does he, china's growing role. now, as, as the u. s. leaves and china also very concerned about the spillover of islamic militancy, intuition, john, or over the border china offering to host talks between the afghan government and taliban, talking of peacekeeping operations potentially of things got to get out of hand. this is quite astonishing job, politically. they see china step into the role of the china,

the neighbors you know, the interest is inevitable and they also realize that they can help them. you know, a lot of san would require reconstruction. a lot of san would require investments, boast, conflict investments, and china, a stance to gain the economic got it. all the china is building the go, other port that has become a priesthood of hottest font being, land locked, central ation. the public's being land locked right. so if there's an interest, greater interest is a lot of fun and simulation. republics who are part of su that china boxes on russia. ah, then their interest is natural, but isn't the only them the, because of the nature of the us is strategic posture. but if i've got

a song does get more involved with belton road and does get more involved with china, and suddenly wants to become interested again, because it's, it's concerned, it doesn't want to be wanting to have all was advocated. it would be a mistake to lose interest. it would be a political mistake that washington will make if they lose interest in stock. it is in their long term interest to remain engaged with boxed up. well, let's talk about the chinese pockets on economic card or the development of god or port potentially potentially a base for chinese worships in the you know, with access to the baby and see how does it feel the commercial hub? well, ports can be used for many different purposes. they can be but that the choices as well. that's the choice you've made. how does it feel to be so closely associated with the power that washington feels is its biggest strategic enemy. we know

wanted them to be interviews, right. we have been historically bridge builders, unix and nixon to china, especially on the late pac sun, played a positive role. and who has benefited from that? both this china, america closeness has been mutually beneficial. we are friends with the boat. so what you're saying is if you need help with that, have you have you felt over pressure from washington? you spent delinkum to weaken your ties with, with aging? or is it just passive aggressive? i think. i don't think they would expect us to weaken our thighs would be, ging been no. b ging has stood with us to pick and tin. the relationship has been consistent, consistent. you know here every 4 years there's a new administration and there's

a new approach. but very china, governments and governments have come in and gone, but the relationship is people centric. but even when we look at the geo political structure moving forward, then we and we have now china and pakistan getting ever closer. we have the u. s. and india getting of a clue for always seeing these. we see a potential proxy situation once again in south asia there. whether this is how things will be lined up. i hope not. i hope not, because we are not looking for. so i post board war gap situation. you want to have good relations with the united states. we understand the significance, the importance united states, the value, the strategic relationship with china. so we want to have conclusions and bolt. i

mean, some say, well this gives pocket on the other closeness with trying to get focused on the confidence to continue to, to have a, have a rocky relationship with india perhaps. but i mean, it was the science to be solved. the fact is, we do not want to have a rock initiative, india, you want to be at peace with all our neighbors who run away from the campus, the dialogue who's run away from the comprehensive dialog box stop who's shied away, not pack us on who has vitiate the climate. not puck on india, 5th of august 2019 the 1000000, the unilateral, the you would violated the bilateral understandings between pakistan and india. right. and if the ticket unit had collections, now that has boom and to day the cash met a policy that india b g b government is pursuing that our voices within india that have said this in going to work revisited and the sides very promising that the units that cease fire as being on it again on the line of control. the army chief solve

a focus on so now is the time to, to bury the past and move forward. he said, we have a dialogue that's going on, talk of a summit between pockets on an injury leaders. why? why do you think now what is what has changed suddenly then you think see a, a preference for peace, instability, the reach of our decision to move from your politics to joey, could mix our desire to 18 economic security to promote investments, to promote regional connectivity. how can we have, do you look at it today without having be spear that you would you like us to see you on time? see, we do not have a look to the u. s. prison. we have to see what our cross off our interests lie in bees with india. our interests lie would be in one stop, right? that gives us that east, west regional connectivity. that opens up new markets for us. right. and,

and we benefit from that. there's an amazing phenomenon in the middle east right now that allows the bypass administration, disengages various powers that didn't really talk to each other before beginning to talk to each other. we hear about, you know, channels between saudi arabia and iran, for example. now the items seems to be suggesting he means that when he says he doesn't want to get involved in the sense that because the u. s. had such a huge presence in central asian south asia, that was an impediment to geopolitical hominy in some ways. now that they're leaving, perhaps their up bigger avenues for india and pakistan and other nations now to properly have a dialogue without knowing that that, that the u. s. is in the others. know the fact is that if, if tensions go down and if miss understandings can be dissolved through better communication. ah, the region benefits if it is an improvement between saudi arabia and iran,

both start to get if there is a better understanding between saudi arabia and turkey, both start to get in the past the u. s. louis, there was if there are g disengaging, it seems that diplomacy might actually flow. they, they would even say, what is a question is we are jo, graphically connected some powers have the choice of leaving at will do we, we don't hear geographically died. where would be though, we have to pull it just. that's why our approach ought to be different. foreign minister, thank you very much. talking to algebra. ah june on a jessie,

who will take half honey's place will bring you the latest from iran presidential election on june 18th. the bottom line returns to discuss current developments in us politics and how they affect the world member state to gather in the u. k. on june 11th for talks on key issues at the g 7 summit, a new series portal brings us award winning digital content to our tv audience. and the sentencing of derek children will be handed down on june the 25th join us for lloyd coverage at the historic us court case. richard its conclusion. june on july the repair hotel is the hotel that i've ever stated. and the biggest box you have ever seen. how did explode taken out? this was the journey. we loved it when it was built and we even when it was

a major town it or the conflict in northern ireland in the late 20th century belfast europa. a new episode of war hotels on al jazeera. ah, i like a strong show of support for the military coup. nita, who's become molly's interim president. ah, hello laura kyle, this is out there alive from joe. how also coming up? the remains of more than $200.00 children. i found that the size of a former school for indigenous peoples in canada.