that normally holds 1000 if you're not excited. of course i love wrestling. i have since i was little since i was a kid i was running around these facilities. this place is already generations old . ah, will mexico allow the sport to return because of falling coded 19 rates. other countries in latin america is still wrestling with when they can resume social and sporting events, and under what conditions. and which one there are 201 cyrus. ah, hello there. this is al jazeera and these are the headlines. west african leaders have suspended molly's membership of the regional block echo us. they condemned last week's crew led by colonel assume the grocer has taken over as president and court for civilian prime minister to be appointed. nicholas huck has the latest from domco go. it still has the ability to answer to those demands. for instance,

no meeting a new prime minister there was a name floated for several days now. the name of sugar, my god. he's a leading member of the m 5 movement or tens of thousands of people on the streets of bama co calling for the end of prison. kate has regime and that's when the military stepped in. so if you nominate a new prime minister and if he sticks to the plan, which is to organize free and fair elections by february 2022, then the suspension will be lifted as well as you know, guaranteeing a new government that inclusive fall rises. randy, politician naphtali bennett, has thrown his support behind a possible unity. government is successful. it would unseat benjamin netanyahu. as prime minister after 12 years armed men have again abducted students from a school. and central nigeria is, haven't been to gina in the state of niger. it's unclear how many were taken hostage, but some younger children have been released. hundreds of thousands of people. the

spaced by volcano and democratic republic of congo are at risk of cholera. doctors without borders says several cases have already been identified, and sa, indonesia has released tankers from iran and panama sees 4 months ago on suspicion of legally transferring oil. the iranian flagship, called the empty horse and its crew has been escorted out of indonesian horses. the captains of both vessels was sentenced to a year in prison for causing environmental damage, but were released on probation. australian prime minister scott morrison is currently holding full talk with his new new zealand counterpart. he's meeting just send a gun and their 1st face to face encounter. since this pandemic began. different approaches to relations with phasing has been a source of tension between the long time line. while there is other headlines, i'll be back with more after inside story. ah,

ah ah, ah, what's ap take india's government? the court, the messaging app says new rules will force it so we can privacy protection. so it's free speech under threats. and how much is the debate driven by policy? this is inside story. ah hello and welcome to the program. i'm hammer, jim, jim. a court battle is pitting whatsapp against the world's largest democracy. india is the biggest market for the messaging service. nearly 400000000 users rely

on it to communicate with friends and family. but like many online platforms, it has struggled to control the spread of misinformation. india recently passed new rules, forcing social media companies to identify the 1st person to send the message. what's ap argues this goes against privacy rights in the countries constitution. the company says it may have to stop encrypting messages, adding it's impossible to keep track of every message. some believe the digital media rules have a political motive. issue with a government doesn't like being defined as government us. it doesn't work and one would be one of these that wants to send. so wanted and in the sense india has a bit it likes to all the time to say what the internet and it wants to be in a position when the control. so want to let them

in, they'll want something similar. india's governing b, j. p has often had a tense relationship with big tech. last month it ordered twitter and facebook to take down posts, which were critical of the governments covered 1900 response. official say those posts were wrong. but critics argue it's the government trying to control the narrative. that criticism was raised again a few days ago when police visited twitters offices in new delhi. officers reportedly wanted to know why a b, j. p spokesman had his tweet listed as manipulated media. the government ban, tick tock and 200 mostly chinese made apps last year, citing security concerns that happen shortly after skirmishes across the 2 countries disputed border. ah. all right, let's bring in our guess in new delhi, it's a sharma point. it co editor of course india, a digital news outlet in math for it in the netherlands, catalina, go on to assistant professor in private law and co manager of the muslim law and

tech lab at must with university and also in new delhi corona and monday, advocate to the supreme court of india and an international lawyer, a warm welcome to you all. it's a get. let me start with you today. i want to try to break some of this down for our audience. when we talk about traceability requirement and identification of 1st originator of information, what exactly do those terms mean? and what precisely is the indian government requiring from messaging platforms like watch app the hey, so of the guy and see a lot of things. but the most contentious is traceability. tracy bas ability basically means that it's a clause that would require social media platforms to locate the 1st order janitta often information. so at any time, if that is, for instance of what's up message that is found to be breaking any laws, the investigative authorities or the government can off whatsapp to trace who the

for sender off of this message or a me motor photograph was. now what's up see, is that this is unconstitutional and against people's fundamental right to privacy . in fact, the messaging app is calling is this a new form of ma surveillance? because up in order to trace even one message, what's up basically have to trace every message because data and they don't know which is the one message that the government or the investigator will want them to trace of this would basically be effective effectively. it will be abuse to the reader to the users of what's up. and also it has a lot of flaws. for instance, if you simply download an image on your phone and you share it with someone when this message is traced, it will show as if you are the person who created this image or wrote this article, or let me know you're the person where this information originated from so that is

the main clause of contention that are of course are the clones of including the appointment awful grievance officer who should be local and in the sector catalina, if whatsapp were to eventually have to comply. when we know they're fighting this in court right now, but if they were to add traceability and allow it, what kind of precedent would that set for digital rights? i mean, other countries would surely start demanding this as well, right? so that's the, these are very interesting points and indeed we are now at a crossroads what we see at that. and i can really tell the perspective of the european policy on this matter. we see that there is a trend to focus on digital monitoring. i think it was mentioning, basically master valence in the next 10 years. i think that this is going to be a very important policy point on every agenda around the world. what we have in europe, for instance, is the digital services act, where on the one hand,

questions about how do you deal with platform liability and how do you make sure that content that is illegal, gets tackled in a more efficient way. these are also things that are right now, falling under the digital services act. however, the, the type of and interference that'd poses is definitely lower and comparison to the indian legislation that was just this cost. so on the one hand, i agree that it is a very, it's very, really questionable development and also controversial development. but i do believe that there are also some alternative regulatory regimes that we can talk about. corrina. how unusual a step is it that what's app is taking india's government to court? how significant is that? and do we have any idea how this might play out at this stage was taken? they didn't want to go to the full. and i mean, that's all right,

we know governance, it's small policy express. i think it's true to said that right under tress anywhere in there on the group with her lease platforms off from national. and when we look at medications, the brain, whether it's on feelings to crack down on his speech, whether it's failing to meet her governance when there's an incursion on a free speech. and then i'm justified in c o n c c o 2 are my age by no local law off particular countries that are in accordance with ashley. i wonder i can just

i think that these are where the john, national and international law issue. i think we have to be very care go back. there are a huge number of problems, the new chevy, one as the requirements for what sex to look at to the end to end encryption essentially. and well, they're not to do is to create a completely different set morgan, which is the but the problem move much much this is what the rules do exactly effectively creates a governmental mechanism for or digital content, whether it's from the media, tcs, streaming, and the oversight mechanism is able to process the contests and it's not the same legislation that you weren't in

a law that has to be following the need for court rules. the rules are made to be assumed on the commission technology act. but the commission cycle jack doesn't actually allow them to which these rules are, are so broad that they're going to be on. yeah. and they're also on the phone. so where do you have criminal liability for, you know, suddenly a potential can rely on digital. you may have gone under the control of government in the us in this way, and she's in my view, and also you can call them know much of the, the future, the reeking of entering them. coaching by was already catalina. i saw you nodding along to a lot of what the crew and i was saying there's, i want to see if you,

if you wanted to jump in. but also i wanted to ask you, because, you know, corina was talking about, you know, tech companies having to comply with, with various international laws. how difficult is it for tech companies and social media and messaging platforms to strike that balance in complying with the laws of different governments, different countries around the world, but also trying to ensure freedom of expression and privacy for users. i would say that it says quite a mess. so if you are a lot from that upgrade globally indeed, as you pointed out, there will be all of these domestic rules at national level, at federal level that platforms need to deal with. and as we were hearing earlier, so if what's ap is going to have to, to, to really emphasize a specific business model in india, but then a completely different business model in europe. and then again, a different business model and the united states that just, that's not also good for users because when we're speaking about what's up at least

recently, some of the, let's say the most important features that it has retained that are considered to be positive. will be features dealing with the encryption that it uses. so here we see in this example that we're lacking international rules that are going to be a clickable to services that are similar. and that apply similarly around the world in comparison to the indian regulation that we're talking about right now. the digital services act propose is a very different approach. so there isn't a general monitoring obligation for social media platforms, for instance, to do when it comes to content that the host. but there is a because the digital services act basically takes on an earlier approach from the e commerce directive that we have in the european union. that also said we're going to give platform the regulatory subsidy. so we're not going to put this very high burden on platforms to make sure that they will know and they, they have an idea about everything that is happening there. so in europe,

this is going to be the continued regime. so we see already that there are these differences and we would definitely be better off having more international harmonization on this matter is i want to talk for a moment about the fact that what's up isn't just popular among citizens in india. it's also popular among politicians and political parties. the 200-1900 general election was referred to by many as the watch app election in india. so want to ask you how much was watch app used as a vehicle to spread disinformation and manipulative political messages during that election cycle. also, how much were political parties and politicians able to utilize the popularity and the power of whatsapp to their advantage? so what's up is one of the tech black form that has been in a number times. it has the most number of users on last month. watch. i pad close

to $400000000.00 users and in combative in facebook has around $300000000.00 around $700000000.00 of $1700000000.00. i'm sorry. it is also a platform that, that is used across age groups from the elderly to the, to the youth up what's up is used across the board. so of course, any messaging on what's up has a very wide spread and wide reach. saw whether it is for elections or in fact i would like to add even for businesses these days, a lot of small businesses are just misinformation, but that it just political or a political of nature. oh, there's a term we use an in depth. what's up university? because there is so much information that is being consumed by indians while whatsapp, a lot of people believe every message they get on what's up saw during the elections . yes, they were a lot of well i every time that elections, whether it is state level or whether it is on a blue, on the national level,

what's up is used as a very effective tool. what's up groups or just mosse message into what's up. well if i remember correctly, i think it was around the last elections last national elections when what's up i to take a lot of steps to ensure code dealing this but at all fall of fake news in india including gul measures like all of stopping the number of times you can forward a particular message which has, which is in your still date. ok, so yes, what's up has big reach and it is not just a common person using it. it is a great tool in the hands of political parties, the government and even businesses current. you know, there's long been a problem with the spread of misinformation and, and fake news over messaging platforms. like what's happened, india, we know this. where is the line between what could be considered regulation and what is overreach and censorship and going after critics dissidents and you know,

rivals really the question with regard to the new deal. we don't charge the answer. right? because my thinking is your opinion, of course. so that there are on the margin of this duration, but can be labeled. now, let us look at new, very rude as we have been applied to me just now what we are required by these they should have been during this message. you know, to me, with donald trump treats we labeling them as being on you know, now that right now this is something that was done by twitter. all that meets all the gcs. and very shortly after we saw the ring on

the door. and what is, why do you need to be thinking that they should? so then let me know something i'll trust with regards to the government's actions when it comes to free speech. now we have not to me and would mean a bit of a disaster come to read me. but then actually me go when it comes to the saying, you know, balance nationalists and mich free speech. whether it's so key, whether it's in other countries, in fact, and all of these platforms up together. and they said the function of the unless you get through the recording in rules and regulations as well. yeah. the jewish, she says we use a basin and huge the government is willing to

use the criminal law and you know, we don't have i mean all that a lot of people see is notched. we quickly apply to their friends and their force. right. so we have a problem here. we have a nice job in it. so it's something that's a tricky issue. but you, when you governmental or somebody is related to the legal part, you parties get ready, you can instill i think, very credible. checking my leave. i actually one thing, you know, we did then on the, on the stand on that meant to be applied to a bird and not only like them but the criminal is working to me. so maybe in

a situation where he's very fine miss selma nation and the very fine need to learn regulation or to be useful and be not me fine. you can feel like they're not, they're kind of like blunder, right? and the lovely decency to find anywhere and know from my so be like you have a chilling effect across the board last there on the life. let me also point. i'm sorry to interrupt you. let me get back to you. actually about the point you were making about the chilling effect and in just a couple of minutes i did want to ask you about that is ago. let me go to you right now. i mean, a lot of critics prime minister modi are saying that this is really driven by politics. what do you say? is there a political motive behind all this? well, it is, i, in my understanding is it is

a mix. a few things are people who are saying that this politically motivated of the correct the reasons seem correct and accurate of the way the government has been using social media platforms over the last 7 years. just build the case for people who say that it is politically more to waited for instance of just earlier this your, when the government was facing flat for the mismanagement of the 2nd day of school with 19, we know that the pushed twitter to take off certain post and facebook, so this new why the laws will be another weapon in their hand in that, that sense student all of the clamp down on voices that they don't like that out against them at the same time. i believe that the another reason for rules like knowledge was said that a lot of these rules are of sort of, you know, slightly outlandish, i would say. and that i believe was also because the policy lacks and wants in many

ways. and this has been a problem with a lot of technology related policies that they didn't government has introduced for the last many years, including things like e commerce, policies, etc. so i feel it's a combination of what, but definitely there is politics and more. no one can deny that catalina. let me ask you a technical question, because you know what's happened. other platforms have said that, you know, this essentially is an impossible task. so i want to ask you, how difficult would it actually be for what's app or a messaging platform like signal to comply with these regulations? i mean, what would it require for them to trace these chaps? do they actually have, you know, the kind of infrastructure to do this right now, and how would they have to change the architecture of these platforms to try to come into compliance? so that's a very good point. and i think that when we're speaking about messaging platforms at which as we heard before, so in certain different groups, they might be used in

a very different way. so for instance, what's being used as actually disseminating information, as opposed to simply having conversations, because as i said, they are messaging platform. this is going to be rather different than, for instance, social media platforms that have been also voluntarily taking on obligation. for instance, to remove content that can be very, very harmful such as child pornography. so i think for, for what's happened for signal given their nature, this is even going to be more difficult. because for instance, to my knowledge, i would be very curious to hear also from my fellow called panelists. if this is the case in indiana to my knowledge, one does not have content moderators. i note from what i know from the functionalities in the affordances of what's app. i believe you can report different types of accounts, but, and i believe that you can also report content. but it might be a very different infrastructure than what we see with social media companies. and

that is, it is quite troubling that at the end of the day, a lot of the content, moderation decisions have been left to the devices of social media platforms. and i think the example of politicians having opinions and sharing information, whether we qualify that as this information disinformation or simply opinion on social media is a very good example because, you know, we're, we're not asking the questions that we're, we are looking very much at what twitter has done with political speech, we're really asking the question of whether it's for twitter to determine whether a politician should or should not express opinions on that platform. but at the same time, let's look around at the regulatory framework. do we have political speech covered, ma'am? is really a fixed for social media. do we have a law that says this is what a politician has in terms of protection or in terms of obligation on their, with respect to their again, engagement with social media. i know that in the united states there have been, there has been at least one case with taken against actually donald trump,

when he used to be the president. and when he used to block individuals using his twitter account, that was then the official twitter account. so you see there, there is simply a regulatory gap because we need to have some rules of engagement with respect to water publications can and cannot do on social media current. and we only have about a minute 30 left. let me just ask you, you're making a point before about the chilling effect that's going on in india because of this. how much does this all have the potential to erode freedoms and also to weaken democracy and the spirit of democracy in india? i think it's more than the word of democracy. i think it's very specific. he what be able to say 3. now whether it's your conversation about you know, with your, with your box or with anyone, from your accountant or with your doctor. not some maintenance is something that would inhibit what you couldn't even say to that. so in terms of

the maxim coming in to your most intimate messaging already happening to the degree with my gums, you know, so let's see here, but it's already happening. thought in the end of the mechanism, it's already happening on on the internet. the premises, i can see a big problem. yes, i spoke about the trans national nature, all of the new stuff to me and why is the negative effect? so we have in fact, right also we can move like the gc out and your most so there are ripple effects of or the job. but i think that this is also not what you see to strengthen but dearer to international law. as

a global people. all right, we've run a times, we're gonna have to leave the conversation there. thanks so much. all of our guess it took a sharma put it catalina, go on to, and kurt and andy and thank you to for watching. you can see this and all of our previous programs again, anytime by visiting our website, algeria dot com and for further discussion, go to our facebook page. that's facebook dot com, forward slash ha inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. our handle is at a j inside story. for me, me how much room and whole team here for now. the news news, news. news

. i see the refugee means starting again. building a new life in a new country is no easy to let him drive. the witness follows one of the last refugee families from syria to be granted an american visa. from their personal sacrifices to the families priam meet the syrian on al, just 0 june on a judge who will take cassandra honey's place will bring you the latest from ron's presidential election on june 18th, the bottom line returns to discuss current developments in us politics and how they affect the world member state to gather in the u. k. on june 11th for talks on key issues at the g 7 summit. a new series portal brings years award winning digital

content to our tv audience. and the sentencing of derek children will be handed down on june 25th join us for loans coverage at this historic us court case. richard a conclusion june on the jazz oh i hello there. i'm the stars the at hand, or how the top stories here on algebra. west african leaders have taken drastic new steps to tackle an escalation political crisis, and molly, the regional group, known as eco s, has now suspended molly's membership after meeting with in from neither a see me great and follows the countries 2nd cru within a year. that gets hot reports now from the capital bunker june to leader colonel see me going to swapped his military uniform for a suit for his meeting with west.