for content to offer to read us back at the live in stock home, the goal is for robot human relations to be about collaboration, not competition. if we can introduce the robot to how for human operator together, they form a new team. they can be more productive in the industrial setting. robots may not be able to avoid harming a human body, but it might take a very hard headed employee to stop worrying about robot harming that your prospects. pull rece, i'll do their stock. ah, hello again. i'm fully battle with the headlines on al jazeera chinese state media is reporting the government is relaxing, is family planning, restrictions to allow 3 children for capital. china is facing a demographic crisis with a dramatic decline in both been recent years. katrina, you has more from beijing. china is heading. if things stay the same for

a living demographic crisis, this is been on the minds of analysts and experts when it comes to tons population for decades. and that's why we did see that marked change in 2016, allowing for 2 children. but it seems that that policy, the to child policy has failed to produce the results of the chinese government was hoping for. and that's because we've seen this census. now china is once in a decade since the results of this were released just weeks ago and that had some really worrying data included in it. his rails opposition leaders has many obstacles remain before coalition. government can be formed, yet he is in talks with alternation is tommy bennett to replace benjamin that the hours are as long as serving primary. the deadline for the peer to secure a deal is wednesday. and he gyptian delegation lead bites. intelligence chief is in gas of a talk with the army for hamas. they've been discussing reconstruction after an 11 day conflict. israel's bombing campaign kills more than $200.00 palestinians and

destroyed many buildings. egypt held, mediate the sci fi and masses looking to consolidate the turkey and greece have pledged to take step simple, very economic ties. the country's foreign ministers have been meeting in athens. the nato members have been at odds over energy exploration and border issues in the eastern mediterranean. india is economy has decreased by 7.3 percent in the last financial year recording its worst recession since independent. it feared the worst is yet to come. following the 2nd wave of coven 19 in april and may vietnam may, suspending international fly says it battles a new call the 1900 very. and it also passed the test. all 9000000 residents are the largest city, or she mean city has been placed under restrictions from monday with at least 145 new cases identified that. those are the headlines coming up next year is talk to al jazeera. i hope you do stay with us. paul county, of course india,

the 6 biggest economy fall, it seems that the world behind those trucks, because of the world was the competition, is china financing the destruction of forests? india is looking for new oil supply. us counting the cost on al jazeera, the israel's offensive in garza caused widespread death and injury un secretary general antonio terrace, called for an immediate cease fire. but israel's catholic, a prime minister benjamin netanyahu insisted that the offensive would go on as long as necessary. wild leaders expressed that concerns pocket some prominence and demanding a c 5. the un general assembly held an emergency session and focused on foreign minister sharma corporation was looking for consensus to put an end to what he called the atrocities in palestine. but what role does pockets don't play,

given the geopolitical dynamics and as some of its key muslim allies normalize relations with israel, focused on foreign minister shuffling the career. she talks to al jazeera ah child, i would crazy foreign minister focused on thank you for talking to al jazeera. how would you characterize israel's actions in gaza over the last weeks back in human encore for the excessive use of force on the 27th of ramadan. you know, attacking exxon mosque was unacceptable. and that triggered off the crisis. mister, what's your reaction to news of a ceasefire having been reached? i'm very happy about the news. i hope it holds boss. experience shows that it did

not hold in 2014, but i hope it holds. is there any indication as to what? what suddenly transpired to make israel realize that it couldn't go on, i think, but the question was building up public pressure is building up all of the world and the lives that they were losing the media wall. nobody expected such a shop people's reaction. the gum once responded later. the people reacted 1st. as this is the qualitative change. one. i think israel was not him expecting the reaction within the mix cities. it is right. you know, better citizens, arabs use it all up, confronting each other in his right. that is a new and precedent to development as part of your efforts here at the you and in

new york that you did convene a meeting of the organization of islamic corporation. and again, you said in the speech that the you said before the muslim, almost must defend the palestinians. i'm curious, they're members of the, oh, i see include sudan, morocco, the u. a. he, bahrain who will normalize their relationships with israel under the abraham acor's . they feel the same way. do they feel that the palestinians deserve to be defended any more be justified it that this was a step towards peace, normalization. and the israeli reaction, ah, i would think would somewhat disappoint them. was there any indication about it at the me? i know they sent one voice. they went to if the gauge, the sentiment within their countries st sentiment,

they realize that people were disappointed. but you said that the power steering issue had gone on the back burner. i mean, you can get a better example than, than these, these nations normalizing relations. do you think anything has changed now, or will we be back in the same situation as we were before? and i think time, israel will do the same thing. it'll, it'll move the grass once again. you cannot shove the palestinian question under the carpet for too long it'll resurface. you can look the other way. but then it's simulink. well, that brings us neatly on to the biden administration's reaction to the the bombardment. how do you, how do you assess washington's reaction to, to the is really killing of hundreds of civilians. and i think we were slow, they should have reacted and acted speedily and they could have save some lives.

this isn't a decision which is very experience, administration v foreign policy. so, one expected a quicker response. this delayed response, subtle, gave an impression that they were not prepared to deal with a situation like this. but isn't it precise you had experienced that suggests. this wasn't being caught unaware. this was a very calculated delay, a great calculated response. i mean, obama did the same thing, of course, and let, let israel do whatever it has to do, kill as many people as it has to. and then obama will eventually he eventually would then say so then, then yes, democratic party as always. right. so, you know, spoken about human rights. well, as we said, that might be foreign policy would have, would have human rights at the center and use sol. how into dr. law

at mad at dad in law was being ly. leave it. ah. so with this good news, i think attention will now focus on the human rights gotten so i hope i hope democracies in the west do not overlook the human issue. that's precisely what joe biden did, and as you said, with a great deal of experience, which suggested a great deal of calculation, that if things did deteriorating them, at least that was going to be his position based on his experience. his been decades in congress no matter the humiliation. once again, benjamin at yahoo! the day after bite nostra deescalate, can escalate the humiliation he's prepared to go through that. because he feels it's necessary. this is calculated, surely this wasn't just being who i would say that perhaps they were trying and perhaps i have no insight information. i'm just a guessing perhaps up promise to nathan,

yahoo was being politics you know, ah, to regain last political ground. and for that, he had to show flex muscle. he had to shore to his electorate, that is a strong man. he means business or biden was prepared to sacrifice his standing in the world in order to know perhaps they kept trying. the patch kept trying, and the engagement that had betrayed the safety blanket. he did tell me that an extensive diplomatic effort was under way. so what we're going to say, i mean a few weeks ago, anthony, blinking feds that human rights would be the centerpiece of american foreign policy . that's completely impacted in years. but then now it's time for them to demonstrate and show the world that they believe in human rights. but surely the

lesson is here that there is a ruthlessness in biden's foreign policy approach, which is once he's made up his mind that israel is the ally in the region that the u. s. doesn't want to get involved in another middle east conflict. he'll stick to it, it's fine. if hundreds of men, women and children are killed in their beds in garza, it's a price that he feels is worth paying them. i'm not sure of ruthlessness and who is the us cannot remain indifferent. they all global paul, you know, they cannot look the other way. they have responsibilities, and many americans who feed in a particular way. if they did not, you won't have seen the demonstrations peaceful demonstrations in chicago in michigan and other us towns. i suppose where this is leading as far as pakistan is concerned. and as we look at a bite and foreign policy agenda is the suggested certainly the, that i glean for was once biden's mind is made up even if it's only the short term

until his mind changes again. but once he's dismissed a country or people, you'll have no qualms about sacrificing population clearly. and i say this in the, in the context of pakistan because it's been very clear since biden was inaugurated . but he doesn't seem to have time for pakistan. there's been no phone call to iran con. there are summits which pakistan's neighbors are invited to the climate change summit. pakistan is involved even pakistan is such a crucial part of it. for climate discussion on boys go to the regional the time they don't stop in pakistan. does that concern point point understood point well made, but the question is should the do that and can they afford to ignore box bob? look at the size of the country. look at the you, strategic location of the country. right. look at the presence of pakistan, but then duma right. look at the history that box on has had with us.

we've been friends and allies in difficult time, so that's not how they fit towards going to be a bomber administrator until you they just will you as sheltering the hall county network and the place. so i'm, i've been having a retirement. well, look at the look at the need for pakistan, for peace and stability, and a lot of fun. is that over? not yet, not yet, but then why do you think the vitamin assertion is acting in this way, given the historical role of focused on in, in theaters that are so crucial to speak for the you must have a hunch. i hope they realize the importance of august on and i'm sure they have found new friends in the region, but why lose all ones? in fact, and in the public pronouncements on afghanistan, they always seem to emphasize focused on as one of several nations with

a stake in the future. galveston, the way that we mention china, india, iran, russia, and pockets on whereas, perhaps before, there was a sense of focus on which is probably just like is okay with us because we were always advocated that of us thought is a shared responsibility. you know, you cannot just focus on pockets on if things go wrong and you hold pockets on this, one will know we have played our part. we will continue to play op, op will peace and stability. but it's a shared responsibility. we cannot be held responsible if there are internal squabbling is going to want to stop. if there is an in fight, you know, a boss struggle going on and a thought on what we are saying is, we seriously with sincerity. want to see peace and stability. you want to start because we ended beneficiaries off on a sob, if any country benefits from peace and upon us on the back of how crucial was

pakistan and getting to the taliban to, to agree to the, to, to the peace deal in the 1st place. and getting the tyler bonds negotiate well you can ask and better cleans up the road blockers on played. he has publicly acknowledged deconstructive role. the positive role of pockets on his plate in getting the thought a bond to dig into. who should he table in pushing the piece process forward in getting a, a piece agreement between the taliban and the us, the doha piece of treatment in getting the piece in trop, clamp. the stalks started in building a consensus for the rules and procedures of engagement. and still trying to break the stalemate that exists at the moment. how would you characterize pocket stones relationship with taliban? there is that sense. we focus on no longer has any you opperation or involvement

with the, with the taliban strategic depth houses as focused on used to good. so what were you just like trusted advisors? i mean, there are, there's a sense of a taliban is going more pragmatic itself is what she was able to learn over the years. one thing i think that thought bon and the f one government has relies or should realize that the people fun is fun. the all, the very mean majority wants peace. recommend the power now give it was focused on was actively preventing the afghan government and functioning with its sponsorship off of the tell about the does that sense of that? that's that relation. change how, how, how, how will we stopping then going to southern country that i had been in countries to take the news. and we have a very clear policy of non interference. we have learned over the years. and we

do not want to meddle in that internal affairs. what we are saying is we will be honest brokers. you would be facilitators, and that's it. would you think it's because of pakistan's weakened influence over the taliban? that the washington doesn't seem to need you anymore? perhaps you don't have the influence, i mean, you counselor when either you do or you are having an operational role with a taliban, in which case you're a nefarious actor. or you don't have an operational incident where the taliban, in which case you irrelevant to washington, house parkerson will never be irrelevant. mark my words, we will never be irrelevant. if you look at the regional picture. if you look at the new global challenges in the making boxes will always remain relevant and you do get the sense. i think you ended up this earlier there that if the taliban does renege on the deal, as i'm about might be blamed actually, even though it's all quiet now. well,

it's easy. it's convenient to make people a pastor buck. but the fact of the matter is we have in all the interactions we've had to thought about, we've got a good, we have told them that they have gained respectability by, by engaging we have told them upon a thought is different in the last 2 decades. it has changed, you know, you cannot live in the past except new realities. and one man can and basically it's your country but doesn't have to reconcile. let's talk of to taliban and india, putting feelers out with each other that must concern you there. sure. if it's all the button is taking you at its word and so is there was nothing there was any suggestions or the taliban is looking at the new reality about gallons down, which means that it might have to have a relationship with india and other nations. once the u. s. on and you see on the

sun is a solid country and they have every right to have relations with india and they've had relations with india. and we have no, we have no issue with that. what we are saying is, and we are not even objective india playing a post conflict, constructive rule and reconstruction in rebuilding militia. with that. what we have said is they have the limitations of the peace process because they do not have their not immediate neighbors of a lot of fun. they do not have 3000000 refugees, a living in their country. we do redo the world, it's forgotten them. but we are living with them, but you're talking of afghan hassan as a sovereign country, but water will be, is a country which the u. s. will continue to bomb it will. and surely i've got to start will go back to the situation. it's also had in the past of

a great deal of jostling of a great power competition. and in this case now, china, india, russia, iran. but finally, finally i've had a soc, is one area where all the big players have a consensus. china, prussia, european union, the us there is a convergence on a lot of sun. they could have differences and other areas, but here, fortunately, there is a convergence. and he's interesting cuz he, china's growing role. now as, as the u. s. leaves and china also very concerned about the spillover of islamic militancy, intuition, john, or over the border china offering to host talks between the afghan government with taliban talking peacekeeping operations potentially of things got to get out of hand. this is quite astonishing job politically. they see china step into the role that the china, the neighbors you know,

the interest is inevitable. and they also realize that they can help them. you know, a lot of san would require reconstruction. atlanta san would require investments, boast, conflict investments, and china, a stance to gain the economic got it, all the china is building the go, all the port that has become a priest or a protestant being land locked, central asian republics being land locked. right? so if there's an interest greater interested in a lot of fun and simulation republics, who are part of your, the china box on russia? ah, the interest is natural, but isn't the only then the, because of the nature of the us is strategic posture. but if i've got some dollars,

get more involved with belton road and does get more involved with china, and suddenly wants to become interested again because it, it, so as it's concerned, it doesn't want to have any money to have all was advocated. it would be a mistake to lose interest. it would be a political mistake that washington will make if they lose interest in stock. it is in their long term interest to remain engaged with boxed up. well, let's talk about them. the chinese pockets on economic card or the development of god or port potentially potentially a base for chinese warships in the you know, with access to the re be and see how does it feel the commercial hub? well, points can be used for many different purposes. they can be, but that the choices are when that's the choice you've made. how does it feel to be so closely associated with the power that washington feels is its biggest strategic enemy? we know wanted them to be interviews,

right. we have been historically bridge builders, unix and nixon to china, especially on the late pac sun, played a positive role. and who has benefited from that. both this china, america closeness has been mutually beneficial. we are friends with the boat. so what you're saying is if you need help with that, have you have you felt over pressure from washington? you spoke to lincoln to weaken your ties with, with beijing? or is it just passive aggressive? i think i don't think they would expect us to weaken our ties, would be ging been know, be ging has stood with us to pick and tin. the relationship has been consistent, consistent. you know, here every 4 years, there's

a new administration and there's a new approach. but very china, governments and governments have come in and gone. but the relationship is people centric. but even when we look at the geo political structure moving forward, then we and we have now china and pakistan getting ever closer. we have the u. s. and india getting of a clue for always seeing these. we seeing a potential proxy situation once again in south asia there, whether this is how things will be lined up. i hope not. i hope not, because we are not looking for. so i post board war gap situation. we want to have good relations with the united states. we understand the significance, the importance united states, we value the strategic relationship with china. so we want to have good relations

and bolt. i mean, some say, well this gives pocket on the closeness with trying to get focused on the confidence to continue to, to have a, have a rocky relationship with india perhaps. but i mean, it was the science to be solved. the fact is, we do not want to have a rock initiative in india. you want to be at peace with all our neighbors who run away from the campus a dialogue who has run away from the comprehensive dialog. parker stop, who's shied away? not back on who has vitiate of the climate, not focus on india. 5th of august 2019 the millions that took unilateral the even violated the bilateral understandings between pakistan and india. right. and if ticket unit at elections now that has boom and to day the kashmir policy that india b, g, b government is pursuing that our voices within india that have said this in going to work revisited. and the signs very promising that the units for the see far as being on it again on the line of control. the chief over pakistan's is now is the

time to, to bury the past and move forward. he said, we have a dialogue that's going on. talk of a summit between focused on an india's leaders. why, why do you think now what is, what does change suddenly, then you think see a, a preference for peace, instability, the reach of all decision to move from your politics to joey. could onyx our desire to 18 economic security to promote investments, to promote regional connectivity? how can we have, do you look at it that would be without having be here that you'd like us to see you on and try and see if we do not have go up to the u. s. prison. we have to see what our cross off our interests lie in bees with india. our interests lie would be in the one stop. right? that gives us that east west regional connectivity. that opens up new markets

for us. right. and, and we benefit from that is an amazing phenomenon in the middle east right now. that as the bypass administration, disengages various powers that didn't really talk to each other before i begin to talk to each other. we hear about, you know, about channels between saudi arabia and iran, for example. now that i didn't seem to be suggesting, he means that when he says he does not want to get involved in the sense that because the u. s. had such a huge presence in central asian south asia, that was an impediment to geopolitical hominy. in some ways another, they're leaving perhaps their up bigger avenues for india and pakistan and other nations now to properly have a dialogue without knowing that that, that the us and the others know the fact is that if, if tensions go down. and if miss understandings can be dissolved through better communication, ah, the region benefits,

if it is an improvement between saudi arabia and iran, both start to get if there is a better understanding between saudi arabia and turkey, both start to be in, in the past, the u. s. lewis, there was if there aren't disengaging it, seems that diplomacy might actually flow. they, they would then say, what is a question is we are geographically connected. some powers have the choice of leaving at will do we, we don't hear geographically died. where will be though, we have to pull it just. that's why our approach ought to be different. foreign minister, thank you very much for talking to algebra. i june on a judge who will take kassandra honey's,

place will bring you the latest runs presidential election on june 18th. the bottom line returns to discuss current developments in us politics and how they affect the world member state to gather in the u. k. on june 11th for talks on key issues at the g 7 summit, a new series portal brings us award winning digital content to our tv audience. and the sentencing of derek children will be handed down on june 25th join us for lloyd coverage at this historic us court case reaches a conclusion june on the jazz either the how does the team from a cooler league draw the big crowd? why does the irish flag fly high? you go to the club? what is it about the celtic that has the world over healing them on politics and football with the prayer around the world,

the defends, who make football on your bill? ah, this is al jazeera ah, hello, i'm real about this, and this is the news are live from doha, coming up in the next 60 minutes, the head of the world health organization, such as time for the world to come together to prevent the next pandemic. more evidence vaccines work as a city in brazil records a 95 percent dropping corona virus death.