was one of the founders of the settlement with this and the story of jerusalem to the eyes of its own people, segregation, occupation discrimination, injustice. this is cited 21st century. truth them a rock and a hard place analogy 0. ah, this is al jazeera. ah, hello tina. this is the news i live from london coming up. the celebrations in israel, off the parliament approves the new coalition government. i just one. ending benjamin and yeah. who's 12 year team. the outgoing prime minister remains defined, turning a heated session of the message,

but he will return and g 7 leaders and the summit, promising to spend $100000000000.00 a year on helping poor countries go green. but leave activists disappointed. i'm devin ash, with the danish football christine erickson remains in a stable condition in hospital after suffering a cardiac arrest. no joke of it comes back from who sat down again. stephanie fits the path when the french 19th from san cycle. ah, we're still in israel where benjamin netanyahu is 12 year run as prime minister is now ended after parliament approved a new coalition government or the narrowest of margins. right? we need enough tale. bennett, israel's new prime minister is a coffee coalition want to confidence motion by just one vote. it followed a heated debate during which nathan, yahoo supporters, frequent interrupted,

and some impedes, had to be escorted out of the chamber. which in yahoo used his last speech, his prime minister, to vow he would bring his liquid party back to power. hello, listen, members of the connected, we've gone from being a marginal state to a rising power in the global arena. this is our way mine and my friends from the national block, my friends of the real rights. and if it is destined for us to be in the opposition, we will do it with our back straight. and so he toppled the dangerous government and returned to lead the country in our way. a new government has a sinister majorities with just 61 of the 120 seats in the class. it, it's made up of 8 political parties ranging from the left to the far right, who were united in their determination to unseen netanyahu. centrist, yeah, you're lucky to need a v s t party is the man behind the coalition. the television anchor turned opposition leader will serve as the foreign minister and then prime minister as part of a rotational power sharing agreement. but millionaire tech entrepreneur natalie

bennett, who's a former ally of netanyahu, will be prime minister for the 1st 2 years. and for the 1st time in israel's history, a palestinian israeli party is part of the governing alliance. love to harry, force it in west tourism. and the new government is worth no time in getting down to business. sorry. yes, they have done what is usually done at this stage, which is to convene themselves in these ready parliament and committed in a separate hole to the the main connect chamber. and so you saw the pictures of natalie bennet heading that round table with la pete alongside him. and very much wanting to present themselves as they've tried since really the, the formation of this coalition to do so as a sort of a pragmatic get on with the job kind of government. that is the message that they're trying to. so to be ready, people, they are aware of the fact that they are ideologically, hugely divergent,

not to say contradictory. and they're all sorts of questions about their ability to stay together in the face of what will be exceptionally strong attacks coming from the yahoo. and his eyes on the right as there were even in advance of the vote earlier on on sunday. but they're trying to get this message that they will get on and do what they say and work to the israeli people. now as far as that. yeah, i was concerned there was a moment just after the vote where he sort of reflexively sat down in his position in the israeli parliament, the connecticut where he sat for the last 12 years as head of the government. he had to be tapped on the shoulder and told no time to go to the opposition chair. it's a major, major moment for not just him for the people in this country because he is part of daily life. he is the man who is sold himself is the indispensable leader of this country. and he tried to make that point earlier during his remarks, just laying into natalie bennett, laying into the concept of this government,

saying that they would be weak. he called him fake writes bennett bennett, seemed to be more right wing than himself on most metrics. but saying that especially on the issue of the prospects of iran getting a nuclear weapon, the prospects of the americans returning to the j. c. p. o a, the year on nuclear deal that bennett could not be trusted even went as far as saying that there was a parallel between a former us president franklin delano roosevelt in his attitude to trying to bomb elements of the nazi holocaust sort of machinery. and his refusal to do that, creating a parallel between that and the current administration of joe biden. so those are the sort of legs that he's going to to try to paint this new government into a corner, particularly targeting the right wingers like bennett, and doing all he can to bring it down before it's really even got to meet under the table. and it was quite a day of drama, wasn't it a rule?

and it it was even when bennett tried to take things off, the procedural way that this happens is that the prime minister designate comes to the podium and says that he is ready to take on that job. and he assigns various positions to various people. makes a speech that was almost impossible for him to do because there was such a volume. vituperative really shouted interruptions coming his way from whose allies within his only could party and other members of his right wing coalition, trying to prevent him from doing so. ben is at one stage, said that the volume of all of this was in direct proportion to the inability of this collection of right wing parties to govern because his argument is so much bound up with netanyahu's own personal interests, his own political fortunes,

his own legal fortunes because of the important student, invests the prime minister's office with, in terms of his own ability, potentially to stay out of prison. if his corruption trial really goes badly. what was also that below was how little reference there was to the palestinian issue. nathan, yahoo did make reference to it saying that it was vital to prevent a palestinian state that would threaten israel and costing natalie bennett. who is someone who's even more ideological on the idea of never having a palestinian state publicly than that knows that had been saying that he could not be trusted on that matter as much else. what this government says it's going to do is just park all of those very ideologically toxic issues as far as the various elements of the parties involved. the concern that could cause splinters just put those to one side. so of course for the palestinians. that's harvey. good news, it just means a perpetuate action of the status cuz it's been so long. hurry for that. thank you

very much indeed. one hundreds of israelis have been out celebrating the end of miss. now whose room these were the scenes and tell them being square after people had devoted past it now whose opponents can be seen celebration the new government with a d. j and dance party. stephanie deca was among the crowded tennis eve. when the announcement came, the it's just been out that israel had the new government, the new prime minister, and absolutely badness. event netanyahu the your agenda being where you can see, believe that they know that they are going to be an easy way for them to come up with a lot of people who are telling outside and not a benjamin netanyahu. enough me that it is time for change,

even though there will be challenges and how long will the government put what they're saying? there will be a balance. what they're saying. make that payment for the 1st time and israeli balance should be what we spoke. you will at least now there may be some when it come. so that's why something that there hasn't been before. benjamin netanyahu has been israel's longest serving prime minister and to show the name looks back in his political career. ah, benjamin netanyahu, the last 2 years in office have been extraordinary, even by the standards of a singular politician. he's been in a near constant multi front battle to stay in power. but it's a fight he's lost, at least for now. the pressing motivating concern is his trial on corruption charges in 3 separate cases. his strategy was that it would be easier to fight in

court or circumvent through deflation if he stayed on as prime minister, the charges which he denies center, i'm manipulating the media in the interests of his public image. all of israel's prime ministers may be, with the exception of reflection, mere in relatively recent decades have become convinced that without them israel is lost and the time you know, so much of that in mind of that mindset and therefore began to, to believe that all means could and should be used to the end of keeping himself and pass it in. yahoo is israel's longest serving prime minister with a 1st term in the late ninety's followed by a 2nd period in office starting in 2009. early talks with the palestinian leadership were replaced by an ever more open strategy of cementing the occupation, expanding settlements and pushing off the idea of

a 2 state solution. his view of the palestinians has always been a racist view. one that is based on control and domination and crashing the palestinians with a long term commitment to establishing or superimpose invasive on all of historical palestine. and here's what we got for netanyahu. iran was the main threat, securing american withdraw from the iran nuclear deal. a major priority, former us president donald trump delivered and much more a u. s. embassy and jerusalem recognition of sovereignty over the occupied goal in height. and in 2020 us approval of a partial israeli annexation of the occupied west bank. in the end, annexation was paused for normalization with arab muslim states. this day is a pivot of history. it harolds

a new dawn of peace. but then last month, a short, brutal war with mos in gaza. for a time it seemed it would splinter the anti netanyahu forces in parliament. but as the cease fire held, the coalition reformed and desperation set in the law came in shell. it's more than this don't form a left wing government. such a government is danger to israel, security and future sub lucky many these last 2 years have seen netanyahu dragged into court and for now out of power still ahead of fight to stay out of jail. mc belen is a former is ready justice minister and initiate the oslo process. he joins his live foss, guy from tell b, thanks very much indeed for being with us. so it was an incredibly close vote. how fragile is this coalition? well, the vote was a close, but we know that a, this is that he doesn't reflect

a real follow of the 2 blocks. he doesn't mean that the block of the right is a o. l is the 59 and the new block, the block for reform he's 60 because there are 6 say are members of nessa to voted against the new government. but the i believe that they consider themselves closer much close to the block off reform. so in the future, i think that they will vote in many cases when the government and for sure not to day right. wing get opposition. it. so it is the real victory. a full day block against nathaniel. and a very clear defeat for nathan. you know, what changes do you think we can expect? so given how divided they are, can they achieve much in terms of policy?

it's, it's too early to know. well, we never have such a government. you will do it from time to time in western democracies like in italy, that there was a call the a full which right and left, united and the full governments. so this is one of them. and they, i don't think that the leaders of these government, which is a dual leadership, a off bennett, and they know exactly what will happen when you say government. the common wisdom is to say that it will have a very short life expectancy. i'm not sure whether this is solely the case. i believe that the day, the ministers, the new minister, so very ambitious and would like to prove to themselves and to the world that they can work to get there despite the differences between them. and there are many

issues on which they can work like something which is very important for you as well and which we don't have. and that is a good thing. and i think that they, they could, they can use the opportunity in which their own try religious policies are not members of the new coalition. after many, many years in which they were members of every coalition in israel. and they were against the constitution because for them, the only constitution is the bible. and using this opportunity in order to have a constitution, which will help also them because they are minority and close. the houston usually takes minorities now. we've heard already, mr. yeah, he said l, i will need you in a daily battle against the new government. how much damage can he cause? well, he has a cold enough damage already as a prime minister. i hope that this the head of the, of the opposition,

the damage that you can call it will be much smaller. you'll see belen net. thank you very much indeed to for jury specie your time. thank you. what i'm doing now. you live but via skype, by my had we sat who's an associate professor of political science that others are invested in gaza. thanks so much for being with us, sir. how much difference do you think it's a new? is there any government will main for palestinians? thank you very much for having me. well, let me say that from a palestinian perspective, we don't really see a big difference between prime minister not on the out stink by mr. let me out on the coming prime minister, understanding bennett, as a matter of fact, mr. bennett is on the right of nothing, you know, and we already know new study, but then he was minister of defense if you use ago when the tell us to me and great marshal region was initiated about 3 years ago. and we know very much of that

study, but it has vowed to continue settlement expansion in the west bank. and that is where the policies regarding the palestinians. and he even threatened garza with the restrictive measures against the palestinians in gaza. so i, the bottom line here is that an externally bennett is a much more hot liner, which when it comes to dealing with the palestinians without the was bank or the gaza strip. there is for the 1st on know, the kind of participation or support at least of an arab israeli party. does that bring any new expectations? it's true that this is this current coalition is a very strange one, as, as it has never been done in israel when you have to radical extreme policies like israel, beta know, lived by i think, the liberal man and the d. i mean,

i lived by miss tony bennett and you have also political parties in the list like the labor and managed parties. and this is the 1st time yes, on a political party has joined the government coalition in israel. but i am not really sure that this was the existence of another party in this school vision is going to make a big difference because already there is a political program for the school that has made it clear that they are going to continue with settlement expansion and the west bank and they are going to continue with fair that measures against the gaza strip. but i think what, what has, what the, the most important reason why this part is, is part of this coalition is that they would like to see that on l out of power. and 2nd, there are promises that the living conditions of the palestinian community inside is where it will be improved. but i doubted that this the existence of an

auto policy. and this coalition will make a big difference with regard to the current coalition policies toward the tunnel citizens without in the west bank and gaza. yes, because i'm not at the time of the sci fi, the international community said that they, they also needed to be an effort to address some of the underlying causes of conflict. is, is that something that you see at all being on the agenda for this, for this new government? it stood that the latest terminator confronting between israel and both of the palestinian issue again on the international agenda. and we very much, you'd promising talks from us president joe biden, who said the costing engine is where it is, deserves to live in peace and prosperity and both deserve to live and in a democratic process. and that would lead identity to the 2 states solution. the establishment of palestinians did alongside the state of israel. but with the cut

on coalition, i find it difficult to be honest with you, with the 13 years of nothing in the office has very much weakened. the possibility of what the stimulus did in the bank. and gaza is where the settlement expansion in the west bank, the releasing of the term deal of the sun. shoddy, which give israel a green light to annex parts of the west bank. that would make it really hard to reach a political settlement with the senate, especially when you have to lead the political parties in this school and were represented by an if tally bennett. and i think the liberal man. and in addition to that, there will be definitely the is where you are position led by nathan the whole, the liquid policy and other religious properties in israel. it's going to make, it's going to make a life of this coalition, a him in the coming days and weeks i was out of thank you very much indeed for

sharing your thoughts on the subject. thank you. it's my pleasure. thank you. coming up on the news from london, academics and business leaders from if you is more turn to gray region one g 70 is they've heard a final offensive imminent brazil is controversial. copa america kicked off with team members from venezuela, olivia, and now columbia testing positive for coven on team. and will update you on the condition of danish triple a christian ericsson collapsed during a year 2020 game on saturday. that's coming up and i haven't leaders have wrapped up this summit and the u. k. releasing final communique saying 2021 should be a turning point for the world. a group of 7 wealthiest democracies made a series of climate commitments including net 0,

carbon emissions. no later than 2050, they also promised to spend $100000000000.00 a year to help poor countries go green. environmental groups say that pledge isn't enough and lacks detail. g 7 says it wants to end the pandemic and prepare for the future. they promised 1000000000 vaccine doses for developing nations over the next year to build up manufacturing capacity on all continents and improve an early warning system. and there was a clear pushed account of china's growing influence over developing nations. they also called on basing to respect human rights, and it's seeing jang region where it's accused of major abuses against the weak minority trying to holler reports from call. they made bold sounding commitments on the carbon emissions on the environment, but with the consumption of fossil fuels. just getting around at this summit, you'd think g 7 leaders. we're here to support climate change rather than defeated . tackling time of change is know as much

a political and communications challenge as it is a scientific or technological one. we have the skills to address this in time, or we need it's a global will to do so. u. k has bar is johnson hailed the g 7 fantastic achievements. they all made significant steps forward towards the $100000000000.00. we're going to need by court to support developing the developing world and tattling climate change. but i can painters and protest as though complained of a lack of ambition ahead of november's climate change summit in glasgow. if we look at the 100000000000 commitment around climate financing, that was committed 2009. and hey, we all, 12 years later,

we still haven't seen it being delivered appearances or everything on these occasions. the leaders looked at ease with one another united in the face of global crisis. but friction and disappointments lurked beneath. there was tension between the u. k and e u leaders over a post briggs in trade deal, invited delegations here in the are in south africa, would have hope to see more movement towards lifting vaccine patrons and host bars . johnson will have wanted to actually raise the 1000000000 doses promise to be donated to poor countries, rather than falling well short in the, in the final summit. communicate revealing that d 7 countries have just 870000000 doses to give away over the next 12 months to some it's achievements quite so fantastic. viewed from the global south, there are 2500000000 access those this that they have most set for themselves. and then if they cannot commit it, they've just only basically committed a intern for $2000000.00 excess if they've bucks

a 100 percent of the population. so the question is, does that sound urgent to you? does that sound to anybody else? the g 7 did, however, signal the return of us global leadership. america is back in the business of leading the world alongside nations who share our most deeply health values. joe biden stopped off at windsor castle for tea with the queen, before meeting nato allies in brussels and russian president vladimir putin in geneva. later this week, joan a whole al jazeera cornwall, scott lucas, as the founder and editor of e. a world view, a news and analysis website and a professor of american studies at the university of birmingham, you joined us via skype. thanks for being with us in terms of the overall mood of the g 7. how do you think it went? well, i think in terms of mood, music, it went pretty well in the sense that you did have this discussion overwrite. what can we do to start distributing back scenes globally?

ah, it's not nearly enough, but at least the mood is 870000000 doses. by next year, the mood music was all right, we're going to help developing countries develop their economies while also dealing with climate change. and then the mood music is we're going to help developing countries deal with infrastructure. we're going to support them right now. the question is, what happens after the band starts playing? because what you heard in that package was, is that beyond the statements, in fact, your law rhetoric and the action hasn't taken place yet. 807000000 doses. great. but the world health organization says you need 11000000000 doses to get 70 percent of a world vaccinated. so you're a long way off what is needed. and you haven't made the commitment to help countries manufacture their own back scenes through pot waivers. climate change look again as the activists noted, the commitment for a $100000000000.00, which i welcome to deal with climate change that help developing economies was made

in 2009 at copenhagen and 80 percent of that money has already been programmed. so we're only talking about $20000000.00 in new money that really was being committed here in the infrastructure. there's not really any detail on this, but not, i don't wanna be so negative to say that nothing happened at history. so the fact is the adults were back in the room. these issues were raised in a way that they were not effectively in the past few years. but now we have to talk about what happens in the months and years to follow this meeting. and i spend one thing that you did agree on as well, was the, the global influence of china and trying to count to that. how would you rate what they've proposed or nation is their risk that public calling out china could, could backfire? actually they didn't fully agree on. it's really interesting, if you read the communique that the communicate raises a couple of specific issues. for example, the situation shank providence, but it doesn't really call china out fully in terms of us could be

a strategic competitor, which is what the americans are calling it. so the americans issued a separate statement about china. here's my worry about the china issue. everything that we talked about, which should be a positive, dealing with the effects of corona virus, dealing with economies to help people be self sufficient, dealing with climate change, all of that mood music we talk about that will become out of tune if it be simply becomes a question of which foss versus china, that's for 2 reasons. the 1st is you need shine on certain issues. you need them to deal with climate change because they're the 2nd larger, largest emitter of carbon. and the other thing is, look, these are issue that shouldn't be dependent on calling a 21st century cold war. these are issues we should be pursuing, irrespective of what china is doing, simply because it's the right thing to do globally. and on that, for instance, on climate change they, they couldn't agree on a firm date to end the burning of coal. how big a miss is that?

again, we got to talk about what actions are being taken now. and we're talking about nationally regional and globally. so germany did make the commitment under the outgoing chancellor handle a miracle that it will move towards 0 conditions of from coal. other countries did not go so far as that. we have got the climate change summit in glasgow and scotland in november. so between now in november, do we actually see concrete steps not to set just a target, it says 0 coal emissions, but to see actually what's happening are, are you decommissioning coal plants? are you encouraging alternative forms of energy? are you doing this? not just nationally by supporting other countries to be able to move away from fossil fuels. in other words, when you give me one of the big discrepancies that i'm looking at, there was a lot of talk in the host of this, you know, g sub force johnson, the u. k prime minister. all these great words about helping other countries about helping them climate change,

helping them develop their economies. that was the same board johnson last week who significantly cut the british foreign aid budget words versus action. thus we got, we got to be looking at over the next few weeks and months. scott luca, thank you very much indeed for your thoughts. thank you. when you 70 it is, of course for an immediate end to the house, tennessee is in ethiopia as t gray region. and this is a growing fear that if you open under a train, troops preparing what they're calling a final offensive, they're a global society, u t. gray scholars and professionals ration open letter to the g 7 pushing their concern over reports. both countries have authorized the operation. fighting broke out into great in november between a few years government and the regions former ruling party. the 2 great people's liberation front are about 5 and a half 1000000 people are in the group of food insecurity. their soldiers have been blocking food and other assistance. but frances, as.