so much that you can give him a ride for a space. thanks. council. reach, about 585 kilometers above earth. the fathers, any human has flown from our planet since 1900. 72. the billionaire who paid for the fried jarred isaac men, took 3 others with him. they spent 6 months straining aboard the automated capital before its launch last wednesday. now the french dare devil has wild crowds in paris as he was 600 meters on a tight robe between the eiffel tower and a theatre entrusted arrow square. nathan pola relied on a narrow strip of rope just 2 and a half centimeters wide as he walked 70 meters above the ground and over the river . ah, the headlines on al jazeera israeli police have captured the last 2 of 6 banners, simeon prisoners with kate, from a high security facility. when he's arrested when identify it and hum gee in

jeanine in the occupied west bank and being a 2 week man hunt hurry foster as more from west jerusalem. the father of one of the 2 men. i am come, i'm g so that he was called during the course of the night by his son saying that they were going to have themselves in because they were concerned about the effects of a full scale ministry operation on civilians in the town. he was worried that if the is ready, destroyed the building that he was in, there could be some kind of major risk to, to other life about his stood the message coming from his father. and the 2 men did . indeed, that building surrounded, decide to turn themselves in indonesia protests have been held for and against president case site in tunis is the 1st major demonstration can piece power and condiment in july is critics accused in all the court. france has accused australia of duplicity and a breach of trust after his comp to submarine contract and signed an agreement with

the us instead. and you passed mean transpose of a multi $1000000000.00 deal to sell it submarine. so australia, relatives of the family killed during a u. s. 0 and strike in cabal, or demanding compensation, and to be relocated from afghanistan. it comes after the u. s. have made a mistake in the targeted and aid worker and 9 of his relatives instead of eiffel fighters, hong kong political elite or voting for a powerful committee, which will choose the cities next leader and nearly half its legislature. fewer than 5000 people can vote thousands of haitian migrants across into the us or to be deported. it's estimated that more than $13000.00 people are saying at a makeshift camp in the border town of del rio, the only crossing there has been close. those are the headlines on al jazeera coming up next year. it's the stream stay with us. from talk to al jazeera, we what gives you hope that there is going to be peace because the situation on the

ground seems to be pointing. otherwise we listen. we were never on. 3 whatever road to off migration we meet with global news makers and talk about the stories on sarah ah josh rushing, billing and for me. ok. and this week's bonus edition of the stream where you get a special look at the conversations we have with our guest. after the live show ends coming up, we'll take you behind the scenes to hear extra from this week's conversation about brazilian politics in the amazonian environmental crisis, as well as instagram live one of the founders of the women's march in the us. but 1st, let's go to el salvador in the live show, we debated whether the country's democracy is under threat and the after the broadcast ended. sure, this authoritarian checklist with our guest. some of the indicators of authoritarianism include, muzzling the media, eliminating political rivals,

expanding domestic surveillance and keeping the country in a perpetual state of war a revolution. and i wanted to know how many of these does el salvador check off. but my guess paul steiner took issue with the list itself. here's what he had to say. but whose recipe is this is from something it's a post forward to i can actually pull up the science called post forward to germany, but it's been exception. it's kind of a general checklist for authoritarian bills, records unity elements. you have set a set of rules like that and assume that everybody starts from when you're through or not checked most of the points. is it true or not? i had to go most or you can say yes or no check. most of these points if he does right, he does the starting point better than

anybody else as his lawyer know. now, having worked for both the right wing lawyer and left wing government, you more than anybody should be able to know that the judiciary is a real man. i personally not fixed on the judges the way i just was the way my paul finished. and then i'll give you the mike. ok paul. say your bit and then we're going to go to we were $650.00 judges that have failed. the judiciary exam at least once, and 10 percent of them fail that every time they've taken it, we have a section in charge of supervising the judiciary and they don't, they've been shut down for years. even the section that's in charge of monitoring the lawyers has been shut down for years. and the whole thing about it is that the magistrates of the supreme court have been elected by political parties to suit

their financial providers. who are the people that they control. so nobody can argue that paul, let's see if what you just said is true. can anyone argue that jose would you argue with? well, i think paul is acknowledging that it is a government who, who is sacking the judges through the legislature of course. but i think this is an important recognition and acknowledgement that it is a government that is talking a 3rd of all of all judges about that they're failing the traditional, a test at the, just the judiciary. it's been a mess for years. and this is, this is an issue. we've done several to several forums and also media. and it's because we are very worried about judicial independence in particular because this law, which basically sacks any judge that is over 60 years of age or 30 years of service or have so 30 years of service has absolutely no rational related to that. you don't want to be so either way, way, way we listen to, you know,

there paul was trying to argue that this, this is all done in the benefit of cleaning up large. but, but you have to remember that this move is preceded 1st by the sacking of the constitutional court. you know, sort of other not only were the fact, but 5 person 5 people were imposed as acting as acting justice is due to the constitutional court. this basically means that the government, buccheri government controls the head of the judiciary. second step is now the sacking of a 3rd, a whole judges with absolutely no linkage to corruption in terms of policy objectives. why? why do i say this? because it only cuts clear in terms of age 9 in terms of merit 19 terms of possible corruption allegations, 9 terms of performance. no, it's just

a clear cut in terms of let me take that back off. paul, are all these judges are failing. tests are those, the judges that are being removed or to just the judges that are over 60. ok, a is making a point about sacking the judges. what the, what the president has done is he has forced a space where he is established with the congress as established a law that says that when you reach 60 or 30 years of service, you come up for retirement. and then it's an obligatory retirement unless the court all 15 magistrates decide that you're valuable and you are going to stay. so they're not automatically set the, the court has a complete those the magistrates. you said there were no, by the hardest part in that i, i don't want to overstate this but, but pull it just said expressly word by word. the precedent has decided it uses

this is i'm thing for the present. yeah, no, i understand. i understand it. i'm not even, i'm not in a court room here, we'll say no, i understand. and so i didn't make them start in the conversation. so you correct. i understand, i understand, but do you like you're not acknowledged that this is a this isn't coming from the president himself. let me ask you 2 questions to answer that one. my question answered 1st, i have 3 questions before that you never answered. first of all, is there a mechanism for taking those judges out if they're bad? yes, they are. there is work well known as being worked as, as no, it hasn't worked as well as it should. but yet, what is the office in 20 years doing mingling with the fact that you additional support point is why the executive mingling judiciary

anyway, and you keep wanting to bad judges, but it doesn't seem like bad is one of the requirements were being removed from the bed just seems like age is a requirement. that's the only way to create a space for the supreme court to act and put the right people in the right place. look what we have here. very loyal judgments who will change. and the majority of the population is behind the progressives who want change. the problem is that once you've lost political power and you're starting to lose economic power, then you've got very little to lose. i'm sure the dinosaurs also screen really, really loud when you're at game i'm actually going to give you the last word. they're all run out of time, john, you want to jump in just for a 2nd, then we got to cut this. yeah, no, it's just going to put that into the context we spoke to judge if there was a most of the week we're salvatore. and that she also has it been corruption in the judiciary and all of them. yet that has been corruption in the judiciary. what they

were all dealing with is the way in which they would be taken out. those are the 60 were going to be forcibly retired. now pool on the one hand here is saying, well that's the only way because the mechanisms to get them out working. on the other hand, they were saying there has to be some sort of protocol apart from age of ways. this is just completely branded. so i think, you know, why is the president not establishing ways to get out the non just late with the fact i want to share with you now few moments our instagram live series. earlier this week i spoke with sarah sophie flicker, an artist activist, and organizer of the women's march. we spoke about the latest attack on women's reproductive rights in texas, as well as the ways that art and storytelling play critical role in activism. i'm also as fire by artist and curious about what drives of creativity. so i asked

sarah where she finds her muse. for me, it's always been really about like things that i want to change in the world or things that theme, patently unfair or, and horrible. and you know, i do feel like we often like we often discount culture and it's power. and i think a lot of times policy is downstream from culture. and oh, you know, it's like the women's march for example, is complicated and there are issues with it and i've had many issues with anyone else. but when i found out that they were organizing around, you know, reproduce justice and abortion on october. second, i was in because i understand that like, you know, even with the supreme court, we are now stuck with an activist, very biased majority in the supreme court. and if millions and millions and

millions of people are out marching on october 2nd and saying like this is not going to apply with that. they hear that, you know, and that affects the decisions that they can and can't get away with or what they perceive. they can and can't get away with, you know, i, you know, i also think abortion especially, but, but really like anything you know, racial justice, any of it, there's the, you know, the right has done a very good job of like sort of encapsulating it in the morality, this morality or family values or whatever. and, and i think that with stuff like this, like they don't get to own that stuff. you know what i mean? like we, i, i am the most family or i imagine you are you, we are the most family oriented people like so just creating art and creating

content and creating tv shows, movies, music, sports, whatever, you know, whatever it is, radio stuff that normalizes. how we think about all this stuff is really powerful, you know, and while we may be getting this country, as we all know is divided has been divided historically. and now, you know, at this point we're getting 2 separate sets of news. even right. like the fact that one sided getting are totally different from the back. another cited getting. but the thing that, and you can like turn off fox news or m. s nbc or cnn, whatever. but people don't turn off the radio, they don't go to sports game and so out of sports, sports games, i know that's not the thing, but you know, they go to the sports game much you know, but they all the things that like we look at and hear and smell and touch and see

everyday like bad influences how we think about politics and each other and each other humanity. and i think it's really hard to have someone who story, you know. so i'm just really a fan of like storytelling and using you know, art and theater and the after colds. you know, beckles to make statements similar to what are seated on the red carpet. on monday with the dra tax, the rich. yeah, your friend made that dress and my wife just yesterday when i live with the woman who made that dress for a meeting and brilliant and smart and like a beautiful fighter in all things good and that we care about. she's wonderful. but i thought that was really powerful and i know that some people didn't like it, but i, you know, whatever,

you go on to twitter and everyone's talking about and taxing the rich and people are googling. what does that mean? you know, what do they mean by rich? you know, it's not a national conversation. that, that's something that policy can't do. you know, so i do believe in cultural organizing, i do believe in like those kinds of direct actions. i believe in beauty, i believe in art. you know, the courses tagline is from poem by tory derek pot and, and it is joy is an active resistance. and i have always held that really close to my heart because the whole point of all this stuff is to keep us divided and in fear and out of community and too scared to stand up for ourselves. so, you know, no one is meant to bite all the time. you know, there's gotta be joy in there. and if you look at any, you know, marginalized,

we've been fighting for their survival over generations like there has to be joining in there. so i think art is like critical in these moments. if you look at the history of abortion, it's so interesting that you know, a lot of, you know, push back on abortion originally came from people who owned in, you know, inflamed people and would get mad when a black woman cause herself to miscarry or whatever have an abortion actually because it was attached to like how profitable that baby was. so there's all sorts of like awful, awful, you know, when you get deep into it, it's like all of the hoopla around abortion has as much to do with

race and control and power and money as it does with women and gender. you know, so it's all, it's all of the things. is there a definitive book on abortion that gets into the history of it that you'd recommend? yeah. although there's not like one that i can like. i know me whoa. who is the president and they wrote a really great one last year. there's a great article in today's new york times that really get the into the way in which the right wing are right. when goes over time from like the 70s to now really weaponized abortion as a way to like create you know, right wing coalition and you know, the origin story of all that really comes back to like school segregation,

which i think most people don't know. so, you know, it's why i really love like, look into reproductive or just reproductive justice organizations like this or song that are all you know, black lead and tend to do a really amazing job of connecting all the dots between this stuff. so you see the ways in which like, what's happening in texas right now, isn't just about abortion. it's also what is the point, for example, having the right to choose to have or not have a child. if you can't ultimately like read that child without the threat of like state violence or poverty or rated them or you know, draconian immigration laws, like whatever it is, it's like all these things are connected. and i think that the more quickly we all

learn to, to see the ways in which all these things are connected. we can be in better community with each other. we can do better allies to each other. and, you know, and that being that, you know, it's slowly starting to happen, which, which i take heart in is, you know, that people are starting to realize like, let the people most impacted tell their stories. let them lead on the issues the people closest to the pain are always closes to the solution. and sometimes like, for those of us, you have a lot of privilege and resources. the best thing we can do is just like show up and listen. finally, another interview this week there was so good, we had to keep it going. it was not brazil and the amazon rain forest. rapid deforestation has many concern that the ecosystem is at a tipping point with potentially catastrophic effects. not just for the indigenous groups there,

but for the whole world because of climate change. after the broadcast, i ask are guess what kind of pressure resilient president, air bus and narrow responds to pretty direct in their answers. impeachment and i don't. i don't think we having a president that actually have a project for the country. so he has a project to, to stay in, in, in the, in, in charge. and, and i think it, i mean, i'm sitting in the country with the president twice last administration and it didn't make any difference. so i'm not sure, but that's the answer either. i think so i think very clearly to intern the internal economic interests. so the agribusiness is very heavy, it was very heavy on funding his campaign. so i think he, we response to that kind of to that kind of pressure. he wants to put brazil back

on the economic mack, a map of the world. and he knows that, that comes from, for the sing more exporting, more even if it, if it's at the cost of the amazon. well, i don't think, i don't think it's real. you know, i think this is making use when he reacts to something. because actually we see him, he reacting ram, he's family, he's song are being investigated when he see a threat against his family. you know, and i think the only way is to get him out of the power is to do what the americans did. you know, not re electing the problem well, is it all on both scenario though? was it was lula any better? has a, has brazilian have been any better under other administrations? i guess there is a difference between both scenario and any other governor president that took place in brazil, which is having a project of destroying this institution. he has

a man to democratic a plan, a strategy you know. so you, you can disagree with lou with fan andre. he t with many other presidents brazil had but all of them had a project, had a plan to, to develop the country to develop the economy and both. so now we can see that in both on our he wants to this try what, what we, what exists. and it's very clear if you look at the last 2, we had a document about the work privilege from the internal auditing from the, from the only government and trying to assess the and the implementation of the environment or policy and the own people from the government

said, well, we cannot access the implementation of the environment or policy because there was no strategy for planning. there was no planning at all in the environmental ministry. so there is a clear speech against flores, against english, and people against the galle chat. some find things that we need to change a low and everything. ringback but there is no thing to, to, to, for improvement or much less. and before. and just to give an example, he's ruling against the constitution. in many ways, in, in health, in education and environment, and cultural policies in all the policies that you might may imagine. where's the supreme court on this than yes, there are many processes going on but. 9 some brazilian papers has published,

i guess international media has been following this for many years. the number of crimes against the constitution that we say crimes of responsibility in brazil. and there are no excuse for not showing him. so it's like alicia was saying in the beginning of the show, it's a matter of political will. and when is his administration up for reelection? both allows administration. yeah. what are they up for re election next year? 2022 actually next year, next year. and how is he doing in the polls there? not that not good. that's good. he's rejection. levels are higher than ever. but he is he,

he's doing policy distributing budget. but did that should go to to health care, to education and to, to social assistance to, to terry's, like he's keeping himself in power by doing the political movement that was able to sustain him for more than 30 years. and you're dealing with breaking news and this information there on this issue also, right? so i think it's important to, to also as stress that was in, in democracy is very and you, so we have a touch of democracy. and it's important to understand that. but because we are know, in a very different situation in terms of social media and how the information is flowing and they can use being disseminated. and this is actually

having an impact on the debate. thank. you know, i was just in a, in a cab today and guy and just name to me that could be 19, doesn't exist. and people in the government get paid for that and it's in my russell it. so colon. yeah, actually could be 19, isn't the ration that diverse. asian is also an invasion. so that's why we need to, to we all the people that are talking about different stations. we always have very strong data. and we always need to, to be very sure of the information that we, we assuming anything in the 5 is that kind of losing the,

the narrative with those 25 percent as possible. so now, well that's our show for today. thanks for watching and we'll see you next time. ah, i'm russell bid in southern england where 2 farmers turn safari park pioneers, a bits the tractors. put nature in the driving seat are just absolutely astonishing the life, the poor back even that the very 1st and last and i miguel sophie, i santiago when one buy in the companies revolutionizing the system. you think plan an artificial intelligence? hearing flight, you have you have the rise phone just 0. examining the headline. we can have a political the senses. well, that's a difference should not be the reason for kill other women do invest because his german location we've gained access to training can run by boy

from different corner. i never see no american dream in america. you just feel like your caged animal things on my child shouldn't go through the program that open your eyes to tennis. if you, well today on al jazeera, when freedom of the press is under threat, you know, you just cause thought genuinely about your thoughts towards the bacon government step outside the mainstream. there has been a implement here just some of the port shift the focus, the panoramic that's turned out to be a handy little pretext for the prime minister if it clamped down on the press covering the waves. the news is covered for listening post on the agenda. we town the untold story. ah, we speak when others don't. ah, we cover all the time. no matter where it takes

a police finn and you guys are empowering. empower. we tell your story. we are your voice. ah, you knew your neck out here. oh, the trial focuses on streaming. and the us overlying, after a cancellation of a huge submarine, order with british and american technology chosen instead. ah, this is al jazeera life from falling back. people also coming up, israeli police have captured the last 2 or 6 simians who escaped from a high security prison. i demonstrated.