gods are leaving the country and stolen images of the upon have painstakingly documented more than $200.00 missing artifacts. the books for them about the sample and trafficking and cultural heritage heritage. you have to say that is increasing pressure on wisdom collectors and museums to return the golden treasure. it is that when they see how we worship and take care of our deities, i'm sure people will be happy to return them when they realize what they have stolen, they must be guilty while only a small percentage of nepal stolen items have found their way home activists, welcome to be homecoming as the start of a positive trend from the at the limbo as ita gutman to ah, let's take you through some of the headlines here now just now evacuations have been suspended around entities in mount cemetery because of clouds of hot ash of raining from the erupt in volcano, so far,

13 people have been killed and dozens injured. thousands have fled the villages off the lava mixed with rain submerged houses. experts say it's unclear how warnings of interruption could have been missed. now who mountain is located in one most eventually, what will i get aria at it's been it's always a closely monitored by our look on all of this. and they know that every time we have a big rainy season, some sort of what they sometimes call secondary interruption, heflin. so they should have been able to get a warning for people. but from the interview dealing to many as to why would they seem to be caught by sure, bryce. so this is still a question that has to be answered. indian officials say 13 civilians have mistakenly been killed during

a military operation. it happened in the northeastern states of nag, a land. the army is reported to have shot at a trot, carrying dozens of people. troops then lay to fire that the crowd of protesters are gathered to demonstrate against the truck attack mon soldier was also killed. vote counting zondaway in the gambia after saturday's presidential election has been a high turn out in the poll seen as the test of stability and democratic progress. 5 people have been killed in may and mars, largest city after security forces ran their vehicle into a group of protesters. dozens more were injured after, during rather an antique coo demonstration in young, gone. the flash mob rally was targeted just minutes after it began. it's time for talk to al jazeera, now stay with us. a secret himalayan, some at law treacherous. then everest. cumber karna has never been tamed.

reviewed and feared by local. yet an irresistible challenge to west in climate a sharper family must choose between going against their religious beliefs and guiding a group of mountaineers, or rejecting much needed income. the will of shadows on al jazeera, with whom am ali i schuman get nobody. iran and the world powers have resumed talks to revive, did 2015 european that did was thought in this building and for journalist like me who covered the story as a digital woman. as for politicians who are talking right now and discussing this deal, once again, it's back to square one. iran is here with a new delegation with

a new negotiating team that was formed after the election of a guy him. but i, you see in june 2021 by the light, it states it's here, but it's not in this building. we're only gc. p roy a, a members which is the iran nuclear deals abbreviation only out of here. the europeans, e 3, the u. k. germany and france. besides china and russia, these are the countries discussing with iran, the new steps. united states is an adult. tell the members of the distribution delegations are meeting with them in other places in order to reach a kind of consensus over how to deal with iran and how to get back on track of the former us president, donald trump withdrew from the deed in 2008, you will get more on this as iran chief negotiator and deputy melissa ali bucket. can you folks just hear a deputy 40 minutes and she's nuclear

negotiator, the 3rd on the bucket. can you thank you for talking to you submitted in the past few days to draft proposals to the world powers regarding the sanctions and the nuclear measure. so what can you tell us about these, the sola minors. him? how to can be the need, the in gulf, the go, how she stood as ryanne as you are already a very sick frowns over negotiations were helped this year in spring and summer in vienna. and ultimately there were some drop documents. we as the representative of the new government of iran and the new can negotiator. we expanded on our views about the draft, particularly about the draft about lifting a legal and oppressive sanctions. and the nuclear activity also has the, the to have him all of it. and so what are the details of these drafts? can we know the details about the draft document from sanctions on nuclear issue?

the important point is that the both parties agreed on, on the foundation of negotiations, which is the same nuclear deal of the 2015. what we have presented is the malfunctions and the laundry, which vary in the text after dropped and be presented some modification of conduct a let me bring it in another way. what are your demands? what are you asking toward powers, java mot? the key them when you ask that we emphasize that within the framework of the j c. p way in 2015 all the issues related to our nuclear activities should continue. so is the case with regard to the sanctions. any sanction in violation in not consistency with the provisions of the j. c. p. o, a should be removed immediately. so is the case with all the sanctions which are

related to the new kid deal. all the functions which have been imposed reimpose under the so called maximum pressure campaign of the united states. they should be removed immediately for that. well, yeah, and do you request verification of this the sanction lifting. do you are, you, are you requesting also guarantees that more of the ross the, the verifications and guarantees that are very serious issues and discussions which will reach happy and outlined in the 3rd document. what do you think that this round of talks came out with? what's the main success that you're going to take with you to, to talk later, we presented some proposals and through those proposals is that we demonstrated that not only the, our series in the negotiations, but also with the proposals we table for the other party. we indicated and suggested our serious determination in order to reach an agreement and the

proposals we have table is now under the table of the other parties. and they are now going to provide us with response, of course, with response which are accompanied by evidence and logical reasoning. okay, so what if they refused your proposal? what if there is no d? the proposals cable by iran cannot be rejected at all because they are based on the 8 provisions of the 2015 nuclear agreement. even the country which had withdrawn from the deal is intent in returning to the deal. and in principle, the countries which are still the participants of the j. c to a they do not want to ruin that nuclear document, adiabatic any is no stranger to negotiations between 20082013. he was as an assistant to so i deleted then secretary of the national security council in iran,

both of them to quote, in several grounds of talks with the wall follows. olga, it was you feel it was a duck tie. got real deadline, lead iran raising and increasing if enrichment of uranium to 20 percent. and the wall follows mainly the lighted states of america and the un security council, imposing harsh sanctions on the islamic republic. and with the election of president passenger honey in 2013 valley rocket, he can, he left the negotiating team and became very critical of the path. then you got to engagement with the rest with the election of president. right? him right. you see in 2021, he was appointed a deputy foreign minister, and later on he replaced both alex he has it. on the chief negotiator, you've been taking part in different negotiating routes in the past. i remember you

are in 2000 and maybe 89101112 these years now that you are leading to talks, what is the different things you bring it to the table? one of the fundamental difference is that the previous rounds of ago stations is that there are foreign players and for an actors which i see is seriously making efforts in order to disrupt the negotiating table. so and how are you confronting the destructions diego and what alex, my grandkids are my see them was like a huge or them on it is quite normal that they try in order to provide obstacles and impediments underway of reaching the agreement. but the important point is that the measures taken by iran have been within the framework off to international law . the non proliferation treaty, the m p t on the safeguards agreement, therefore they have provided a good ground for the land republic of iran to reach an agreement the controversy

of what you want. your program started in 2003. and since then, there were negotiations and thought taking place in different places around the world from vienna where we are right now to geneva, designed to do this. i stand assembled. busy many cities are under war even back that he all the cities saw iran and the other international fall was me think in order to reach a consensus and a settlement to and this controversy in 2015. there was a possibility to reach a deal. and the d was announced on the 14th of july. the mentation of this deal is started with the government of president barack obama in the united states. and the government of president has central honey, there's law, make republic of iran. but just in few months after the deal though, there was elections in the united states and president obama was replaced by

president donald trump. that meant to menu that the nuclear lead was heading towards and honestly of faith. and in fact, just a few months after the election of president, donald trump, he announced his withdrawal. these countries withdrawal from the nuclear the and then started imposing new sanctions and re imposing all sanctions on iraq. iran responded at a year later by starting to decrease its compliance with the deal and going towards enriching uranium on higher percentages from $3.00, asperger, 2015 to 20 percent. and recently it announced that it started doing some enrichment up to 60 percent clarity. but now for example, the i 80 port said that your and reaching 20 percent, which is something you declared,

i think among to go. but now there are accusations that the wrong might be heading towards enriching 90 percent, which is a weapon. great, is this true? this neil is about 90 percent and the enrichment was broken by design is media and zone is sources. and fox news was immediately denied and rejected by the highest authority of the international atomic energy agency, which is the director general. you will be willing to do that in the future. our nuclear activities are taking place within the framework of the n p t on the same course agreement is so really clear that if the j c p o, a parties re fulfill their obligations according to the jcp away, we will do the same. and we will fully comply with our commitments within the framework of the nuclear agreement. dr. luckily, 2015 was a long time ago. it's like 6 years ago. and the jesse p o a within the situation within the geopolitical conditions of 2015. is it

still alive? is it still valid today? are you here to revive at that deal? maybe when it has in the car and the price for, for reviving that the ill to sustain that the has been based on the measures taken by iran because the united states pulled out of the agreement and it's completely violated the deal. and the european failed in practice to shoulder fully compliance with the j. c. p. away last august. and it depends on the behavior of the other party, the europeans in full compliance with the j. c, p. o, a and with the americans to return to detail. if this happens, then the deal will be revised by attorney. show it to me as it is the did sustainable within the framework framework that it was negotiated in 2015. both parties are determined to return to the 2015. is that

a timeframe for the conclusion? are you going to talk forever? it's been like 20 years now. you're talking about at least 19 years since 2003 and it's like 19 years. no. are you going to talk for under 19 years till you reach a final agreement? i believe that the response by the other party to the logical proposals of the atlantic republic, or we don't, can definitely provide onset to a question. and if, if there is no d, i'm just assuming there is no d what's, what's next? our presence here indicates and suggests that we are seriously the term mind in order to reach an agreement. and we, we do serious assessment of the wheel and determination of the other party and the behavior of the other parties in order to see if they are prepared to return to the full compliance of the deal. and also to set aside their while ations the

maximum pressure campaign that former us president donald trump launched. i gave the wrong for him, imposing and imposing sanctions against it. and this led to serious column vices in the country. one of the faces of these, a crisis was the free fall of the currency, whereas it lost more than 200 percent of its value. the markets in iran wouldn't able any more to export their products to the wall. and this led to recession. also, iran wasn't able to sell any of its point to the external buyers besides international companies and organizations were warned not to corporate or to invest in the islamic republic because that would make them a subject to american sanctions till the moment. this is having its impact on the

iranian economy. however, after almost 3 years since exact mormon, it seems that veering in economies starting, restoring itself very, very slowly. and this is being reflected in the new numbers coming from to her. given the maximum pressure strategy and the sanctions that were imposed on iran in the past few years, the economy situation isn't good. there is a lot of pressure. how much would iran be able to sustain without a nuclear deal? now quite my, i'll on if the saw them all our economy under the circumstances as the of the past several years under waged to you as sanctions and the sanctions imposed by the u. s . allies on these lamps republic oberon has been able to advance and progress. this is a reality that the sanctions have had an impact. but these lambert republic oberon

has proved that the sanctions cannot be effective. watch slam being on mall dowell, the car is out of seattle. you don't really. we in fact would rely on our domestic capacities and capabilities. and we will also expand our engagement and interaction with the country which are serious and effective in, in dealing with us. we will seriously pursue that track of progress, economic progress of our country. during the past several years, the united states has pinged all its efforts in order to block iran economic links with the world. but we demonstrated that we can bring their efforts to failure and continue our economy on a positive charge. but this does not mean that the americans have not inflicted any damage on our people or our economy. and therefore,

one of the issues we are seeking in the negotiations is the issue of preparation by the united states for the harms and damages they inflicted on our people. and would they pay that? would they pay the compensation? are they showing any readiness to detect the issue or reparation has been on the agenda of the top of the vietnam negotiation. and this is an issue which will be dealt with in the 1st document. there is a 3rd document, aside from the 2 documents that you presented or submitted the previous day. so what, what about this 3rd document? why isn't it proposed point? now the other party is in fact presently studying our 2 documents. we provided them, we are waiting for, it responds and as soon as we receive their this response, we will continue to work on the 3rd document. i just want to recap with you. so we have one document on the sanctions. we have another document on the nuclear years.

what's the title of the 3rd documents decision decision? so just to, to, to go more into this issue. you are requesting, lifting the sanctions, all the sanctions on iraq that were imposed during the past years. you are request requesting verification. you are requesting guarantees and compensation. right. so how much do you think this is realistic from, let's say, the american point of view in our negotiations with the other party, the other parties are endorsing the need for guarantees and the need for this stablish ment of a verification mechanism. both russia, china, and even the europeans and increase ability americans also must accept. and in the previous drop documents, the americans have accepted this framework. but the main point is about how the

guarantees should be presented and how their verifications should be implemented. it's not really possible, as the american say to lift all the sanctions. if this is what they're saying because it's not all the hand of the, of the president, some other sanctions should be lifted by the congress. so negotiations is about give and take. what are you giving here? the given take has already been conducted within the framework of the 2015 negotiations and the agreement, the 2 parties, i mean iran and 4 plus one day accept and agree with the deal. and the united states, which had pulled out of the tail, wants to return. therefore, it a given take concept has already been materialized in 2015 negotiation. now we should take measures which could remedy the blunder is of the country which had pulled out of the deal so that that country could solicit qualifications to return

to the deal given take happens when both parties violate anything. we did not. why let anything it was the americans that violated the day over the past 2 decades, wall bowers had a main concern over iran is nuclear program where police issue or this program having a military asked or the military dimension. therefore, the main issue that was being discussed all over these years was iran given guarantees. it's not going to build a bond. however, yvonne said on different occasions that the supreme leader had a fatwas that prohibits building nuclear bombs or any kind of weapons of mass destruction over the past few weeks. as well as when warning that if the united states, the europeans, russia and china, and going to issue a clear stance and have a clear, a position from iran's developing the nuclear program,

then it's going to intervene in its way the united states. and israel had several discussions over what they described as a plan b that we are going to resort to if there is no deal. there are moments where nations must use force to protect the words from evil. if a thorough regime is going to require nuclear weapon, we must act, we must make clear that the civilized world won't allow. if the rain is don't believe the word is serious about stopping them. the race to the ball. israel reserves the right to act at any given moment in any way. that is not only our right. it is also our responsibility. iran is publicly stated. he wants to wipe us off. we have no intention of letting this happen, right. know there are also freshness pressure or we can hear the israelis calling

on the united states to stop the talk sent on the whole what power to stop the talks. and in the past few days there were a lot of calls. ready and stances coming out from israel, showing a lot of concerns over what might be happening in vienna. i asked them that are over. i told you earlier that external actors design is, are making serious efforts in order to impede and disrupt the trend of negotiations . design is, are trying either to attack iran's nuclear facilities or disrupt and impede the trend of negotiations. and it really depends on the independent identity of the other part is to demonstrate that they are not going to be influenced by design as regime here. and they and decide, based on the interests of themselves and their own country. what about if his role

decided to strike the iranian nuclear? you mean military attack military with each other? because they're talking about this. i believe that the zionist should dream of attacking iran. and if they go on to this dream, they will never wake up from that dream. what's, what's going to be, what's the price? what does it mean when, when we say someone does not wake up from the dream when someone is not existed, that one will not wake up? the last thing in this interview. so how much are you optimistic? this is going to reach somewhere. we are optimistic towards the future and success of the negotiations because of our serious determination to continue negotiations and because of the strong logic we are pursuing in the trend of negotiations. but we will not be gullible because we do not trust the other party. just an additional

question here since, so if you don't trust them, they don't trust you. how are you going to reach that agreement or consensus? is it an attempt to go into, let's say, cohabitation hello negotiations and agreements are for those who have differences of opinions. and it's not going to happen that with the negotiations, all the differences aren't going to be removed. and every party comes to the negotiating table based on its own interest. it's. i think it's very clear that unless and it wasn't dr. albuquerque, it honest deputy foreign minister and chief nuclear negotiator. thank you for talking to julia. i also thank you and your viewers know that this round of talks came to and then delegations went back to the capitals that have consultations with the governments and then come back with answers. the answers are going to show

whether this agreement, the 2015 agreement is going to be revived, or that the iranians under international are gone to bonds, are going to have new talks, new framework, and maybe a new nuclear ah. december on, i'm just a host the feet that i recall a momentous event for the region and a glimpse of what's in store for the 2022 world cup people in power investigates the use and abuse of power across the globe. a well exclusive interview with joint nobel peace, lori recognize the safeguarding freedom of expression as a pre condition for democracy and lasting peace from shore documentary to in depth explaining portal. showcase is the best voucher 0 digital content. as the year

draws to a close. we look back at the events that have shaped the news and look ahead to next year. december on a jesse europe. this is al jazeera, it's november the 15th day, one of the new era and television. you. if you have known that, that was the scale of bloodshed would you have still going to go to miss all landed about a 100 meters away from us. we're on the front line, but it's on the fall that isn't on a very, really coming our way. i was just over here. god, by the police on purpose with lord. i'm 0 is offices in garza. our house in that building has come down

little before in human history has a month for steam environment to the arctic in such peril. whether it's cute and cuddly in australia, wild and ferocious in bangladesh, birth rise, we dress is the balance between endangered wild life. and then noisy neighbors about forest right there, and there's nothing between the how you have a human habitat learning to live together on al jazeera, how many people here have seen a tiger like big oh, really, the stage is said and it's time for a different approach one that is going to challenge the way you think we're ditching the sound bites and we're digging into the issues from international politics to the global pandemic. and everything in between. join me if i take on

the lars. dismantle the misconceptions and debate the contradictions. upfront with me, mark lamond hill on out there. ah, at least 13 people are killed and dozens injured. as a volcano erupts and indonesia is east java province. ah, if i'm sammy say that this is al jazeera live from dell hall, so coming up, 5 people are killed, the security forces, and me and mom drive into an antique who protests the gambia awaits for the results of an election seen as an important test for its democracy plus.