and thousands of worshippers in pakistan's largest city corral, she came out for prayers. the large outdoor gathering has been held at the cities polar ground since 1958. ah. this is al jazeera, these are the top stories protested, occupying the homes of sri lanka, president and other official buildings. so they won't leave until both the president and prime minister stepped down both of agree to resign. already, after a day of protests, the country is struggling with its worst economic crisis. in decades. elise 14 people have been killed by gunman in a bar in south africa. it happened in the nom samo, settlement, and sweater, south west of johannesburg. police say a group of men opened fire on the patrons just after midnight. for these 15 people were killed in russia, military strikes in the ukrainian town of chunks of yar rescue. as fear more people

are trapped in the rubble of a 5 story building. russian ground forces are pushing to take control of the entire done, yet screeching. come with hopefully he'll alina, he loses. what have we done to them? and one of our people done to hurt them. there was dark dust, and then it all started. we ran to the basement, there were 3 hits, the 1st somewhere in the kitchen and the 2nd i don't even remember there was lightning. we ran towards the 2nd entrance and then straight into the basement. we sat there all night until this morning. the metal door was blown and it wounded a woman. and then there was a man wounded over there. the lineup of candidates to replace boris johnson as british prime minister as growing more crowded by the day. former defense secretary penny mordant does announce. she's launching her bid. our follows for contenders who entered the race on saturday. japan's governing ruling liberal democratic party has one sunday's parliamentary elections. the vote was overshadowed by the

assassination of its former lead action. so ab, a 2 days earlier, a fast moving fire in the us state of utah's burn through hundreds of hank tis of land around the town of fillmore is one of several fires in the area. fi fi as have been, sprang the surrounding hills with flame retardant. they've also ordered evacuations of nearby properties. muslims around the world have been celebrating the festival of each other and the rocky city of mosul prayers were held to the al no re mosque for the 1st time in security forces we gain control of the city in 2017, the most famous, our hub bomb minarette was blown up by iso to win the battle to defeat the armed. great. okay, well those are the headlines. the news continues here. one outage is era after inside story, make sure you stay around for that. ah,

twitter says that it will take legal action against the law must for pulling out of a takeover deal mosque accused the platform of what he called a material breach of their agreement. but the lucky enough to win the case of what's likely to happen next. this is inside story. ah, ah, ah. hello, welcome to the program. i'm adrian finnegan. one of the richest people on the planet says that he's changed his mind about buying twitter, tesla seo. ellen musk says that fake accounts could amount to a 5th of twit as users. that's 4 times more. but he was initially told the company

denies this and says that it will so mosque to push through the deal. we'll begin our discussion in just a moment, but 1st a report from out cirrus phantom on a $44000000000.00 deal to buy. twitter is the richest man the world. isla musk says he's terminating the contract 3 months after locking in the agreement with iq used the company of failing to provide information about fake accounts on the platform and whether they make up fewer than 5 percent of users. twitters board chair says it kept its end of the contract as planning to sue. i think twitter probably would prevail in this. i would think simply because there are, there is a deal. know, he must, can get out by paying a $1000000000.00 fine or $1000000000.00. it's, but it's hard to find a $1000000000.00 penalty. and my guess is that that's what he's trying to prevent is not having to make that 1000000000 dollar payment for many. the focus now turns to stocks and whether twitter and tesla, which must owns will take a hit by the investors wanna see must just get back to focus has the space x.

because twitter from the beginning, you just really been a distraction, has been overhanging stock. musk sped to take over twitter stirred controversy back in april. critics. we're concerned the tesla ceo would promote misinformation on the popular social media site, especially on matters related to politics and health. mac said the acquisition was about stopping censorship and defending freedom of speech. analysts say the billionaire may have experienced buyer's remorse is trying to walk away, and the weight is contracts are structured. it's very difficult for buyers to walk away. either their, these contracts are drafted with a hot or 2 to provide a high degree of certainty for the sellers. now terminating the $44000000000.00 contract will have to play out on the legal front. and social media will surely have plenty to say about it. vince mullin al jazeera. ah, so let's bring it, i guess from new york,

we joined by jim anderson, ceo of social flow attack and social content distribution company from london, charles, author, author of social warming, a book on social media, inherent unavoidable effects and from new york in miles, founder of oceans x, y, z, and a consultant on social media content strategy and branding. gentlemen, welcome to you will. jim will start with you before we get into the nitty gritty of this deal and ellen musk and everything that's going on right now. i think we, we need to get back to basics for just a few minutes. at least, i'm willing to bet that for every avid twitter user, there are just as many people who don't have an account aren't interested in the premise or have an account and don't use it and just don't get what it's for. why would anyone be willing to pay billions to buy twitter? well, it's all about attention and consumer attention and the 300000000 or so people on

twitter are very influential if you want to reach politicians, if you want to reach political reporters. twitter is a great place to do that, so i think even much attention originally was genuine to twitter. it is an important platform. just look at how former president donald trump used, or in many cases, misuse twitter to reach his base and deliver his methods. so i think even mosques in things where, wow, this is really powerful, really important. i just don't think he thought through very clearly what it really meant to get it. and, and this for your pretext that the box and spam are a real problem and that's nothing more than a pretext is complete nonsense. and he's just trying to manufacture or reason the get out of the deal because the prices are fine and watch him for someone who doesn't know what are we talking about when we're talking about bots and fake accounts and, and spam. what is all of that mean? well, it turns out as it's remarkably difficult to actually quantify and twitter will allow you to sign up a fictitious satirical account. i could sign up an account that says elan mux in her brain and start tweeting, what i think you know, you must, might,

might be thinking there's plenty of satire, accounts like that. some people would say that fraud. some people would say that satire and comedy and so you get those kinds of issues in the analogy i've use, trying to understand the number of spam and bought a council on twitter. it is a little bit like trying to help a number of fish in the ocean. right. it changes all the time. it depends on where you look. what you saw today is going to be very different than what you see tomorrow, and is a very moving ecosystem of accounts being created, deleted twitter takes them down, you know, so there's a whole lot of activity going on. and again, it's just a complete nonsensical pretext. chung's office is twitter good for society to what extent a most use as simply reinforcing their own world view. when they scroll through that timeline, it's an echo chamber, isn't it? sure it, it can make people feel better about themselves and, and that point of view on a whole range of issues. but is that good for people and is it a good long term business plan?

sometimes is good for society sometimes and sometimes it is useful in say for example, in the u. k, we just had a week where we had a political crisis and ministers were resigning, left, right, and center. and they were doing it on try to bring out their resignation. love is that which all lead to the build up of pressuring as the prime minister. who owns the state. erstwhile anchor, forgot we had a new protest against the, the government there are. and a lot of that has been to long to some extent by social media. so twitter has a role. i mean, you know the question, why would someone want it? and it's it, if it didn't exist you, you'd want to invent it because it is so useful for spreading news direct. but when you haven't got things that going on, and then yes, it tends to just fuel animosity because of the way that it works. because the twitter engagement is the thing, at least show people adverts, what needs them using the service. and the way to do that is either either to show them things they agree with completely or else to show them things they really

disagree with completely in will argue about. so basically the business model is make people argue with each other, so they spend longer on twitter and which is slightly away from what are the actual tennessee of the service to make it useful their child, you have to be following the right sorts of people don't you while you do this is one of the quitters will failings over the years is that it was so useful from the start. and it became so useful really from the 2009 when the news story about a plane crashing in the hudson river went well while it was actually that was on twitter before it's on any of the main media services with a picture showing what had actually happened and that will demonstrated how to make a difference to are the information flow around. well, the trouble is it's never managed to actually unlock the way in which you can show people things that to meet their interests. even though we show twitter what it is we're interested in by who we choose to follow all the time. so with that, there's

a sort of inherent contradiction. neil must kept on saying that, and he was gonna unlocked with his value quarter powerful the span on the bought stuff, own back yet to be done. and you know, it's a sort of project that maybe will actually be worth doing if, if he actually thought it was worth doing. but her clarice changed his mind about it. they say child that, that twitter knows what we're interested in because of who we choose to follow. this is the point that i want to put to to ian myers in as a, as a journalist, i have a twitter account. i've had one for many years. i hardly ever post though, because i feel personally that i don't have much to add to the shouting of the arguing that it goes on. sometimes as a journalist, it's good for breaking news as just just saying twitter. usually, twitter users are usually well ahead of the mainstream media, but twitter, the company when it tweets, news is usually well behind the curve and tells me things that i don't know. it

adds a badly targeted at me anyway. as far as i'm concerned, i'm for ever having to tell it that i'm not interested in nearly everything that it pushes at. be nice. that's my experience with 7000 followers. how many other users are getting the same? is twitter a good business? is it well run, and is it worth spending billions of dollars on it's? it's a good question. i think it depends on your perspective. i mean, for journalists, certainly part of the utility is at least in the us. i'm not sure the extent that you pay and around the rest of the world, journalists have started create their own personal followings as opposed to generating calling for the outlet that they work for. so you're starting to see print media personalities to utilize twitter to make themselves popular, and they either migrate the sub stack and start selling their reporting directly to consumers, or they sort of use it to get more high leverage jobs are sort of become news outlets of their own and so it has a certain use for those people it's, it's

a good question whether twitter is business they haven't made. i think they didn't make money until 2018 that, you know, for a long time wasn't considered necessary as a tech company in terms of it being well run. you know, it's, it's had a lot of employee turnover. and they haven't been able to stay believe, show any kind of net income other than times when donald trump in the, in the election of 2016 and, and beyond. we're driving engagement from users. and you know, frankly they have a board that seem very interested in their own wealth and not really interested in twitter as growth as a service. and that is also reflected in upper management where twitter has had a lot of stagnant product development for many, many years. now in the last year they released flu of new features. they're experimenting with things like spaces. they just announce tweets. they've sort of twitter, blue is their kind of monetization angle. so they've done a lot more rapid iteration last year than they did maybe in the last decade,

which gives me hope the service will, will improve. but i think it has been just very stagnant riding on the coattails of this immense utility for over a decade. but then again in the, becoming the go to become like meta they, if they keep sibling with things, you look at what, what matters on the facebook and with instagram, you have a product but, but everybody initially loves and a likes to use. and then the company wants to squeeze even more revenue out of it and ends up in the case of instagram. and as far as i'm concerned, it ends up ruining it. yeah, i think twitter is in a slightly unique position. these to be meadows products. it is, as charles mentioned incredibly high utility product, it's not something where you can see your friends see what they're eating. i mean, you can do that. but the core use case of it is the rapid spread and share of

information which can be good to can be bad. that's, you know, depends on what it is, who's doing it. but it is an extremely utilitarian product. and that i think is why they haven't been forced to go down the road. the metal has been force go down, which is largely requisition. most of their own internal product development has been deemed failures. they acquired other businesses because their audience continues to age out of facebook and now facebook is primarily either used in sure not us north america, around europe, around the world, or it's used by more elderly populations, us, america, and europe. so you know, they don't have that base before the in twitter is again, really written on that and, and then stagnated their products. because right, let's get to the issue then hand gym. what's gone wrong with the musk deal? you alluded to it earlier. why does it look to have fallen apart? is mosque simply dr. drive down the price at which he buys here or, ah, his grievances genuine. well,

i'm not even sure you must knows what he wants out of twitter. he is absolutely trying to drive down the price come, incense would say, why would you want to pay $54.20 a share for something that's now worth you know, in the low $30.00 per share? so we're talking 10 or $15000000000.00 worth of value 1000000000 with a b there. and you know, you don't get to be one of the world's richest men by being dom about finances. so he's, he's smart in a tactical sense, but he's causing an enormous amount of damage to twitter right now. he's is criticizing their management. he's criticizing their employees, he's criticizing their, their entire ecosystem. and twitter have 7500 employees who have families and mortgages and jobs and the, and those kinds of thing. i think, you know, it's interesting to look at the spectacle, if you will, of what you on mosque is doing. and it's kind of amusing in one sense, you know, rich person sort of gets to play by whatever really wants to. it's not at all amusing if you're a twitter employee or maybe if you're a tesla shareholder and you feel like this is just

a big giant distraction from when, where you must should be focusing. as charles says, it's going to take legal action to ensure that this deal goes through as originally agreed. how can it do that? can it do that? i would absolutely can do that because her because must sound a deal to require the company for volleyball $1000000000.00 and $54.00 for the show . and he's on out without really have done any proper due diligence her. and then afterwards started asking for the date of the bible, how do you define spam had, if i'm bots, have you know where all these numbers? and then since i sort of period back in april has been near making more, more demands for rather weird numbers. one thing to sort of get some sort of back up initially said testing was so that he could just verify the numbers and was recently saying, wow, of these numbers were being made up, which is sort of the fe, can't the, or how do you define a body, it's really hot, but yes, the year that the deal actually contains a penalty clause of

a $1000000000.00. if he, if he breaks off the bill and, but equally toward it could, i mean there are sort of legal ways in which they could say, well, i'm sorry, you're on the hook for the whole 44000000000. and so you know that, so go to court more $42.00 pay it. no one suspects that the final numbers going to pay is going to be somewhere between those $2.00 numbers, probably more towards the lower and my and, but everyone who's looked at what the deal actually say's in any detail. people gravely, tim works with these lee and it's pretty confident that what twitter has is going to stand up in court much better than masks, claims are in a mosque, is that perceived of tesla. he said that the man behind space x one earth, would he want twitter? what's in it for him personally? and what would twitter looked like under masks, ownership? would it be? would it be good for twitter users, but really outlined too much. i mean,

you talked a lot about what he's going to do with twitter. it's been mostly big. there's a lot of confidence in him as a leader because of the success, the tesla, see, and the basics, and seeing that a lot of the other projects, even more things like or, and company, the tunneling business that he's been involved in, has given investors a lot of confidence, even shareholders, a lot of competence. i think the, the news we're seeing coming from weeks around from twitter, employees says that nobody there. it's really super thrilled about it. so i think for, for them it's not going to be great. i also don't think there's a lot of evidence that he's good at taking over companies at this size and scaling them better. he's, you know, he's grown incredible. companies pay pal space x tesla from almost nothing, but it's an entirely different business to take over a company with nearly $10000.00 employees. that's a fully mature platform and turn it into something much better. and i think frankly the evidence, you know, that he can do that, which is

a very different task eliminate. so i'm not entirely in agreement with the people who are super confident and his abilities. i would also say there's, there's been a lot of speculation that this was purely away for him to sell tesla stock without having to give a a reason he'll, he'll, you know, have liquidated almost 7000000007 and a half $1000000.00. even if he pays the $1000000000.00 break up fee and spends $100000000.00 fighting litigation, he's somebody's famously, most of his wealth is kept in stocks, which means, you know, he probably doesn't have a lot of cash on hand to do the things he wants to do, and so there is a lot of speculation that this could also have been entirely away for him to liquidate a substantial amount of money without too much scrutiny from the fcc, which is an organization that he's not too friendly with. and i honestly wouldn't put it past it, he takes a lot of learnings from the donald trump school, twitter usage and sort of the look at my right hand while my left us something else

is something that we've seen a lot of people do before. and you on mosque wouldn't be the 1st or last person to take advantage of. jim said, nodding vigorously, the end was running through that incredible ill on musk c, v. given a given that wire a twitter stuff. so opposed to him becoming its owner. well, because he's, he has not articulated a compelling vision other than twitter is terrible and i want it to be better. oh, by the way, twitter is over staff, by the way, twitter employees don't go to the office. by the way, twitters management is terrible. you know, if you're a twitter employee, you're like, well, goodness gracious, that doesn't make me feel very good about what i'm doing and the hard work i've put in. and maybe we could get over that if, if he had a real clear, incredible vision about i'm going to do this with twitter, but when you start hearing him talk about free speech, his ideas around pretty speech are mostly nonsensical, quite honestly. just last night he band somebody, he block somebody on twitter which got paragon

a free speech on twitter who blocks somebody else on twitter or some minor twitter dispute. it's just kind of comical and so it doesn't lead to a lot of confidence as an employee that you're going to feel like, wow, you must go to the rescue and he's going to make us a better place. he'll mess around. no criticizes, he'll lay some people off, they'll cut costs and issue some edicts and then maybe i'll get distracted by some other sign. the object i'm left trying to clean up the damage. chelsea. picking up on that free speech angle. i mean, ask you the same question that we put a little earlier about what twitter would look like under on a muscular ownership. and what does this whole saga tell us about the importance to society of a platform like twitter should social media platforms be regulated in such a way that they can't be owned by someone who will soon move on to that? to a new shiny object as, as jim just said, and should they be more strictly regulated in terms of their content and what people can and can't say on them. oh, oh yeah. okay. so that's, that's the question for the alan, especially if you don't want someone fly again,

then you get someone who just focuses on part time. that's best, geico, mcgiver, he totally does have control of facebook. and you know them the medical or former instagram and has control of the the voting shares, missouri the boating chair. so or so to pick your poison really near that. yvonne lawson charge a twitter. how to look at it. i think it would look very messy. i think it would sort of zig zag between different things. if you come in one day and say okay, what we need to do is much more of each victim than he can. the next as a oh, this free speaks of terror unites really just the big problem. we should really be a moderate more. the problem that the platforms have is that they, as i said earlier, they're, they're totally predicated on the idea of holding your attention. so they can show you adverts and the way to hold your attention is to show you things that you get outraged by and which you then for field, you have to walk you back against. and that's the model, the, the sort of underpinning model that the algorithms use. so if you shift to some

other sort of model then, then it sort of stops looking like any, the social network we have now. now something where you're rewarded, perhaps for the value of your input and the way that it works is entirely different . maybe a subscription model, which again, something must, did actually talk about vaguely as all the ideas he had when he was talking about having more subscriptions for to to. but then the problem becomes all when you get out to developing countries and less developed countries, people aren't going to be able to afford or want to spend money on a subscription yet. do they not have some utility in providing us with information sharing information, getting information? so the, the question of what it would look like is, as an, in a complete imponderable, i think, as well as sort of multiverse things where it's sort of litigating everywhere. all the time. okay, in and what about the competition? what it must take over of twitter be good for the platform competitors. does it really have any serious competitors? i did not really have any serious competitors. there was

a lot of noise made about social. donald trump recently left the board just before an fcc investigation, again, they struggled from the technical problems they struggled with the user acquisition . twitter is one of the stickiest platforms, especially session media platforms on the planet, and doesn't really have any direct competition. certainly not in, in the west, though. it's a different story in china and i to, to charles point, you know, i don't think taking a twitter private would be entirely a terrible idea. i mean, which is authentic. what mosque is offering to do? there is just going about an terrible way the pressure on twitter to, to post, you know, growth to post profits, drives them towards the same way. it has driven meta and all of their social media platforms towards this kind of engagement metric which is generated through sort of extreme agreement or extreme averages. i think twitter as the, as a one of the most useful social platforms could benefit from having the pressure of

that growth taken off them. which could be done by taking the company private, allowing them to sort of really focus on product development. it could be done by, you know, some kind of regulation that wouldn't, would mean that they wouldn't have to focus on, you know, pleasing investors in return and could, instead developed a platform, it's way more honed and accurate tool for its users and, and for the people that they needed every day to access information. all right, jim, i've got about 40 seconds here. how's this gonna play out? will must be forced by twitter a be a great price? who's going to blank 1st? well, i think the court case will say that he is required to buy twitter, which is very different. them actually buying twitter. he's got a long history of sort of disagreeing with regulatory agencies rulings. and so what happens if the court in delaware says you must complete your acquisition and he just refuses, right? they can try to compel him to do that, but it's,

it's really difficult to force somebody to buy something they don't want. so then you get into the case case of what are the damages there? does he pay the $1000000000.00? i think twitter would say that's not nearly enough for all the damages you've done to us. so we're going to be in that gray area and it's all going to be a negotiation as to how much he does pay. and does he end up owning twitter in the gentleman that was fascinating, but we're out of time. many thanks indeed for being with us today, really appreciate it. jim addison in new york, charles author in london and in my is also in new york as always, thank you for watching. don't forget, you can see the program again at any time. by going to the website al jazeera dot com for further discussion. you can join us at our facebook page at facebook dot com, forward slash ha inside story, and you can join the conversation on twitter handle at a j. and so i story for me, adrian, putting them on the whole team here. and thanks for watching. we'll see you again with

ah on counting the cost, we ask, what's the price of rebuilding you crave and who are going to be the financial winners once the war is over? plus hyperinflation is gripping zimbabwe examined the unorthodox ways people are trying to protect their assets. counting the cost on al jazeera, the health of humanity is at stake. a global pandemic requires a global response. w h o is the guardian of global health delivering life saving

tools, supplies, and training to help the world's most vulnerable people, uniting across board is to speed up the development of tests, treatments, and of vaccine keeping you up to date with what's happening on the ground in the world and in the lab. now more than ever, the world needs w. h o. making the healthy a world for you. for everyone. after a lifetime in finland, an emigrant returns to somali land upon discovering his ancestral home could be a gold mine. but to benefit his community from the minerals beneath the land, he must navigate the age old, tribal disputes above it. ah witness. golden lie on al jazeera.

ah, ah, this is al jazeera ah, hello, i'm new parker. this is the news, our life from doha. coming up in the next 60 minutes, that's where lankin station protest to say they won't leave the president's house until the country's leaders step down. or than 20 people are dead in south africa, off to 3 bar shootings and separate areas, raising questions about policing and gun control, ukrainian search for survivors. and in an apartment building, devastated by russians.