until team and your security staff on the ground and we have the law enforcement agencies. and we are complimenting better decision making with dieter so that's, that's very uni organizers want to avoid seems like this in may, kiosa opted in paris when police use tear gas and pepper spray on fans trying to get into the champions league final last month, a $125.00 people were killed during a stampede in indonesia, it happened when fans poured into the field and then tried to escape when police fired tear gas banners in cutters in their learning from these incidents to avoid any of these scenarios. some of the members of this team have been here since the 2006 asian games. and now with the help of all the gadgets, they could get their hands on, including 22000 cameras. they said, this is the future of how sports is going to be covered with just days to go. their preparations are set to face reality from

a majority out of era at the aspired command and control center. ah, just a quick look at the main stories of and following as our and in pakistan, a former prime minister in ron con has vowed to resume his protest march after he has recovered from what is called an assassination attempt. he was addressing media early on for the 1st time since he was injured on thursday con, accused of the current prime minister, chabarise sharif, as well as the interior minister under intelligence, official of orchestrating the attack on him back as sounds military as call his allegations baseless and irresponsible, and have urged the government to launch legal action for defamation, hulu land below 3. people made this plan. these free people aren't part of the 4 people who are named before who had 1st decided to kill me who i made the tape on.

these are 3 more. how did i find out people on the inside told me one day before, was there a bad? they saw the crowds were building up. these crowds weren't seen before in pakistan . they made the plan to kill me. and the russian president vladimir putin says civilians should be evacuated from harrison as ukraine continues its counter offensive. who's in made these comments who are marking russia's day of unity in central moscow's red square? the russian defense ministry says that more than $5000.00 civilians are being evacuated and harris on every day. ukraine is accused rusher of carrying out illegal master potations of its people. though a russian installed official said around the clock curfew had been imposed on her son. but then back tracked on that soon afterwards. and we've been following developments out of san francisco as well, where twitter has started a mass, lay off of it and please under new owner, ellen musk,

many staff members woke up to find they've been locked out of their work email accounts. musk acquired twitter last week, companies facing a class action lawsuit. now from some employees who said they were not given. the required notice mosque has indicated he might fire about half of the 7 half 1000 workforce up front is coming up next, looking at you estimated the elections. ah, it in the united states, the right to vote is just that a right. not a privilege. however, in the run up to the november mid term elections, there has been a slew of legislation pushed through aiming to curtail which should be the right of every us citizen to have their voice heard in electoral politics. currently,

there are a number of cases before the united states supreme court challenging measures that would undermine representation and participation of black people and other minorities if past adding to that is the growing number of tactics being carried out on the ground right now that are suppressing people's access to the ballot. so what does this mean for us democracy and the voting process? ah, joining us today is latasha brown, co founder of black voters matter are we berman senior reporter at mother jones and the author of give us the ballot. the modern struggle for voting rights in america and sarah bran and managing attorney at the a c l u voting rights project. thank you all for joining us on up front. natasha. i'm going to start with you because you are in georgia, which is a republican stronghold reportedly, but it's a red state this kind of turning into a battle ground state. black people they are though are having to contend with some sweeping voting restrictions. and i'm trying to get an understanding here of what

the state of things are in georgia right now for black voters. you know, as you said, people may recall that right after the 202021 election. what we saw on the state legislature there was a beal call s b 2 o 2, senate bill t o 2 that passed on the sign into law by the governor who i call the a brand camp who is the voted suppression. i'm chief, i think around the country that part of what they bill did. and the short way of understanding is that there are components of that bill that one restricted access to the ballot to and literally weapon as administrative process in such a way that the governor republican party can actually were challenging take over on election results of if is that to their liking, i'm in the 3rd thing that it does as creates is culture, fear by criminal as an organizations such as our own and others that are literally doing things like comfort care to provide just water, a pizza and copper care for people that stand in a line for hours and so like this by 1000 cuts. so they've been using these

different tactics to write, restrict access to create this culture fear, and to really be able to weaponized as administrative process. the good news is that what has happened, and george is that we broke in, all kinds of records related to having more people to turn out for early voting. you know, the narrative from republicans is that, well, this proves that voters suppression does work. the real narrative is that because of both suppression, certain communities like the african american community, is pissed off, we decide to organize ourselves is taking a tremendous amount of time, human capital, and resources to really be able to combat these barriers that have been placed in a place up and what we're seeing is that african american voters are literally making up of the school over performing adapt between the report between 38 and 40 percent of the early african american. both ari, i mean, the whole point of the 1965 voting rights act was to prevent their from being buried. and constitutionally black people in our popular all citizens have the right to vote. but historically, things like poll taxes,

grandfather calls all sorts of stuff, stop black people in real life for being able to vote 1965 voting rights acts as okay, we'll stop this. now you have real representation, real access to the vote, and yet right now where to moment where it seems like for the 3rd time the legislation is being got it. we're literally re battling re litigating the same battles. we that we fought 60 years ago and walk me through one why this piece of legislation was so important in to how was it being struggled over now? well, that's absolutely right mark. we had decades of disenfranchisement in this country of black americans really going back to the founding itself when only white male property owners could vote and then voting rights were steadily expanded. first, fir, white men who didn't own property and then dramatically expanded for black men. with the passage of the 14th and the 15th amendment, then many of those rights were taken away. and it wasn't until the 965 voting

rights act that everyone got the right to vote in this country regardless of race or color. and that was a monumental achievement because you had a situation where in states like mississippi only 6 percent of african americans were registered to vote before the passage of the voting rights act. you had counties in alabama that were 8090 percent black. and there was a single black registered voter before the 1965 voting rights act. so it revolutionized american democracy. it made america a true democracy for the 1st time. there have been efforts to try to chip away it for years. but those efforts have dramatically accelerated in the past decade. and i think the reason why those efforts have dramatically accelerated in the past decade is because number one, the republican party itself has radicalized against american democracy. but number 2, they've taken over the courts and the courts and the congress with the 2 entities that always protected the voting rights at the voting rights act was reauthorized 4

times by the congress. and it was also say that those re authorizations were all signed by republican presidents. so there was a broad bipartisan consensus for the voting rights act for many years. but republicans have now turned against the voting rights act. and in particular, the supreme court with 5 and then now 6, conservative justice has dramatically weakened the voting rights act. in 2021. they severely weaken the law. it harder to strike down discriminatory voting changes. and now they're basically on the verge of legalizing racial. jerry bedroom, so the combination of republicans turning against the voting rights act and, and capturing the course and waking the voting rights act has left it in a very perilous position. you mentioned gerrymandering. oh, i want to go there. latasha. i know you have a lot of expertise, some bizarre, i wanna bring you in 1st on this because what's happening in places is they're literally redrawing districts so that black people, their vote counts. but there's no powerful black voting block there, busily diluting the black vote is a case marrow versus milligan in alabama. what we're seeing this very thing,

and the argument from republican seems to be well, but we're, we're, we're caught was, was because of line. so there is no black voltage is volts, awful, it's matter. right? so how do you make sense of this? how can we resist this narrative and how dangerous is? so we're very worried about the supreme court case, which is marrow versus milligan, which is the alabama our district in case i think it's worth noting that the alabama legislature drew the alabama maps and in the congressional map, a 3 judge panel which included 2 drum, trump, appointees at unanimously ruled that the congressional map and alabama violated the voting rights act. and part of the reason to understand is exactly what you're saying, which is the map that they drew. the state legislature drew really packs and cracks as the words that we used to deny that. so they put all of the african american populations in sort of altogether in one district instead of a really drawing maps that reflect where like people live in alabama. so what

happened in alabama is after that decision was re issued, the supreme court stayed that decision and then took the case out, but recently heard our arguments on that case in early october. and the concern is that the u. s. supreme court is going to undermine that ruling, undermine the voting rights act, undermine the voting rights act, which has been incredibly successful when you talk about a re districting and vote delusion to sort of ensure and protect and make sure that minority voters by letters get equal opportunities to elect candidates of their choice is that a persuasive argument are not to you, but perhaps to the courts in your anticipation. that voting is race neutral, that every vote should count, but they, black people don't have a right to elect black candidate so that you know, as long as your vote counts in this district of that district, it shouldn't matter where it counts. i mean that this is what the republican legislate legislatures are arguing. yeah, i mean end, the thing is it doesn't really matter what we think. it just matters what 5 conservative justices of the supreme court pick. and so clearly they think that that's going to be an appealing argument to them. you have to go back though,

because this argument has been made by republicans for decades. that basically the voting rights act was becoming a form of affirmative action in the electoral sphere. and it's been made more aggressively by republicans in the last redistricting cycle. and they've taken some really dramatic steps in florida. for example, in the maps that were put forth by the governor rhonda santas which in and of itself was extraordinary. as a governor is not supposed to control redistricting, they just filed, dismantled, majority black districts and away that was clearly thought to violate the voting rights act. southern states have very clearly diluted the power of black votes deny them representation. so you're not saying one group should be favored over another . you're just saying that the group should have equal access to the political process. and it doesn't really make sense in a state like alabama, which is over a quarter black that they would only control one of 7 districts or that in

a state like florida. there could be no black representatives or very few black representatives after this restricting cycle as done so i don't think it's about special treatment. it's about everyone treated the same and right now, white republicans in states like alabama are being treated differently more advantageous. lee, then black democrats are black voters writ large because black voters are much more likely to associate with the democrats. so i think on the merits of the case, it's pretty clear. that's why they, one of the lower courts of sarah said, but i think you have a supreme court that is extremely ideological when it comes to the voting rights act. and they're going to find a way to rule in favor of alabama. that's what they want to do. there's another piece to this latasha i want to talk about, which is the actual voter suppression bills since january of 2021. there have been 400 restrictive bills introduced into legislatures around the country. that is a stunning number. there are those that would point at this being part of a larger kind of racial backlash against the black community and minorities. ah,

there is a fear of black political power. ah, that is motivating jim crow era voting restrictions. some would argue we're seeing efforts to criminalize, we see people who have food and water, we see the lines get longer. we seen fewer voting locations. i mean, it seems to me that this could have a material impact on the midterm elections. if, if, if black you will have it harder to vote and it could be harder for their vote to count. this has a material election on literally not just on black voters, but it actually unravels democracy that we have to really recognize the fragility of democracy. that we're dealing with right now, so i can talk about george. i can also talk about florida, where in florida, where the centers is actually created a police force, essentially to actually be in the termination to for voters the are. there's one voter who was a former incarcerated returning citizen who had registered to vote because his county said that he could register to vote. he was awake. and one morning at 5 o'clock in the morning with a swat team at his door and a helicopter over his house and police in his back yard. that is at his most, that is not only traumatized and an intimidation, but really when we look at it,

those are signs of fashion. we have to really recognize what we're up against. this is not just another election around the democrats and republicans. we're literally an election that we are determining what is the future of democracy in this country . not just where the black people can vote, but whether people can bo, who may or may not have the same opinion as those that are in power. will we have free and fair access? we have a system that people are not punished because they participate in their lunch. so sir, there's a way that we've talked about this along racial lines. but in this country, it's also more difficult for trans folk to vote. a disabled folk to vote ah, 9 english speaking people to vote poor and working class people to vote. i mean, structurally, it seems to me that the most vulnerable in society have it hardest when it comes to accessing one of the very things that might make their lives easier, right. which is access to the democratic process. um, is this a new thing or has every, have we historically always me to harder for all these wonderful groups to vote?

i think we have, there has been some history of always making it harder for these vulnerable groups to vote. but i think it's a fair assessment to say that it has gotten worse in more and recent history in the last 10 years. i think one thing to understand about it is, and this is, comes up particularly in georgia, was that the early vote is a good example, which is that as we, as a society have modern i and our technology and our access to try and, and figure out how to do things. there's great opportunities, early voting, registering to vote online, automatic voter registration, just all of these ideas that take it a vote by mail that really good example that take advantage of some of the technology advances we have as a society. and in some places, there's a lot of effort to try and implement those improvements to make it easier for everybody to vote. particularly people of color people who are lower income people who have disabilities and need more assistance with voting. people who have, you know, our english is not their 1st language. we have the capacity to help those people

participate in numbers that reflect who they are and how they fit and r and r a populace. but the response of republican legislators and unfortunately of some of our courts is to discourage those modernization, ari and another group that faces these challenges. these systemic barriers is the native american community. i mean, you see lack of access to ballad boxes. you see native american citizens being rendered in eligible voters sometimes because they don't have standard uh, street addresses which of course is very common if you live on a reservation. for example, i talked to me about the obstacles that native american populations experience in why there are so many of them. huge obstacles to native americans voting. first off, they often live in more remote places, particularly on reservations. and i don't want to say that everyone does, but obviously in no places like north dakota, for example, in the navajo nation,

people could live a very far from a polling place. there were efforts, for example, to help people drop off their mil balance because pulling places were far away, those efforts have been cut down. they were efforts so that they could register to vote on election day because registration could be difficult. these areas are, those courts were cut down. there were tribal ideas that they could use for any thing in their lives. but the law for it in such a way that you had to have addresses on your ideas and there were no addresses on some of the reservation. so then you couldn't vote with your tribal id. that was an issue we saw in north dakota a few elections ago. so i think sarah is absolutely right, that groups that her, her story disenfranchised at her historically marginalized, that have other socio economic difficulties. those play out when it comes to the voting process and those are a lot of the same issues that are facing a native american communities where it's not just that they lack access to voting.

is that there's other issues that they have in their lives that they're manifested by not having easy access to voting and, and the laws have been written in such a way to target those voters. because native american voters are also a constituency that tends to favor democrats in places like north dakota, in places like arizona doesn't get talked about a lot. it's on a group that's mentioned very often. but for example, in arizona, the navajo nation is going to play a very important role in the outcome of that election. and so i think you're actually right, and it's very good that you brought up those barriers because are often overlooked . sir, there's a legal theory that's been gaining traction with some republicans. now, i'm going to stipulate that this is fringed theory. we're talking about here, the independent state legislature theory or the iso is the idea that the state legislature has pre eminent power over other parts of a states legal process, including the ability to override a governor, veto air or state court decisions. now, while some would argue that this is an obscure theory, there is

a pro i s l case before the supreme court right now, should people be worried about, ah, the push to kind of these centralized powering give states the last word? yes. okay, and as i think it's important, and that was a quick yes was i actually was expecting you to say something quite different. i mean, i was, i was hoping you'd say something went on now. i think there's reasons to be worried . so the current case before the supreme court that will or are going to be heard in december is out of north carolina. the north carolina state constitution has a very clear protection of the right to vote. and an inherent history in the case law in north carolina. that there should not be partisan geron monitoring. so of course, the republican legislature in north carolina drew both the state legislative map and the congressional maps very partisan lead. jerry mander, there were successful litigation. the north carolina supreme court agreed. this is the state supreme court agreed that those maps violated the north carolina state constitution and violated the right to vote in the state of north carolina because

they were so partisan, geron mannered, and demanded that their legislature draw a new map. so they got, there are actually new congressional map, there's a new state legislative map there was, will actually be in effect in november. but the republican legislature appealed to the u. s. supreme court, which then took the case and they're making the argument based on the provision of the us constitution that has never been interpreted to mean this, that the state legislature is the one that should have the final word on all things related to voting. so your state supreme court, your state constitution would have no impact. so what that would do is feel so obviously absurd. yes. and it would create completely power, state legislature, making it a logical and political process partisan process even rather than totally and completely opposite of the concept in american government, which is both true of the state and federal level of balance of power that you should have more than one institution, courts, a governor,

a legislature making these decisions and that that is how we get to the fairest and best place in most circumstances. and the fact that the u. s. supreme court has even entertains this argument and is now having an oral argument. and has said they're going to entertain this. this particular concept is very concerning. concerning is an extravagant understatement. verify ari. we're seeing a lot of legislation enabling voters suppression, but some are still hoping for a big voter turnout, especially from young people. you know, in light of the overturning of roe v wade, how important is the youth vote to the mid term elections? very important, particularly in a mid term election because the fact is a lot of young voters just don't turn out in a midterm election. a lot of people just don't turn out period in a mid term election. and we're going to see probably less than 50 percent of americans turn out in this next election. and we're going to see even lower turn out among younger voters because that's just what happens. a people get really

excited about the presidential election and they're much less excited over who the governor might be, who the secretary of state might be, or the attorney general beer who their member of congress might be. even though those things are extremely important. and in some cases affect their lives more than who the president is. and so i think there is a growing realization that rights can be taken away in this country. i think grovee wade was an extremely illuminating moment for a lot of younger people who thought will always have reproductive rights always have a right to control what happens with my own body. and now they don't of, not just because of the supreme court, but the fact that so many states, immediately criminalized abortion in a way that was unthinkable. and wisconsin, for example, there's an abortion been from 1849. that's one year after wisconsin, while he mistake that immediately went into effect. after roe v wade was overturned, it makes no exceptions for rape or incest. it's totally out of step with what voters in wisconsin want. and so i hope this will be an illuminating moment for

younger people to get out and defend those rights. but my concern is that not enough people are paying attention to mid term elections. not enough people are paying attention to what state races do and not enough people are connecting the value of their vote to change. i think there's a frustration here that democrats have to address in terms of getting well developed quickly, younger people. so i want you to help me look forward a bit, you know, given all of the voting issues, getting all the tax on the voting rights act. what are we looking at beyond midterms and other than the court fight, which are essential? what should individuals be doing to protect voting rights? so i think, you know, advocating to your local and state officials because they're the ones that really control a lot of elections and that's going to be true. unfortunately, more and more as the courts are less of an avenue. so i think one thing you can do, it's really important is to pay attention to these issues. as ari says,

to make sure that you are voting to make sure that you're paying attention to the impact that you're a, that your votes have both the midterms and, and, but also in some of your local state elections. because that's really important in terms of determining who is acting, making decisions about how electrons are ron alice in your state. and that's where some of these decisions come from. and so i think it's a fundamentally important, i mean people need to pay attention and understand that there are consequences for voting to understand that and more important consequences for not val, yes, consequences are not at the are, i would say you, well, i think sarah is absolutely right, of that, that i think 1st it starts with voting in these elections because these electrons are going to shape american democracy for years to come in. the question we're facing now is will people who don't believe in free and fair elections be elected to take over election system and that, is it extremely frightening, frightened process? so i think 1st it starts with voting, then it starts with deeper structural change. i mean, the fact is,

democrats would have been able to pass these voting rights bills if they had modified the filibuster, they refused to do so. so that's really not just on republicans on them for not doing it. and that's why we need structural change in this country to make our institutions more reflective. because whether it's jerry mender, state legislatures, whether structure of the u. s. senate, whether it's the electoral college too often there is very popular support for certain policies. but those policies don't become law because they're able to be blocked by a much smaller minority of americans or the way our institutions are structured. so i'm very concerned not just about what's gonna happen is next election. but our, our institutions going to be moved in a way that is more and more and democratic. and that's why i think we need a more long term movement for deeper structural changes countries. while latasha, you're on the ground, you talked to the people all the time, which individuals be doing to act to help change the circumstances were. so i

say 3 things. why? and i call it the 3 ours. they've got a response, which means you've got to respond to what is happening right now. if you're not registered, you need to register to vote. if you are ready to vote, you have to respond by literally making sure that you go out and vote. you get other people to vote, vote with you that this isn't a mom to stand on. the fat was that there are consequences that will have long last, in effect on our community. the 2nd thing is you've got, we've got to resist it, have to be completely unacceptable that any national party in this country can align itself with white nationalists and it can be okay. they have to feel consequences. we have to recognise this isn't just about a policy on different, this isn't just about party power. this is really around a sending a message loud and clear that white naturalists will not be tolerated in any form. and the 3rd thing we have to do is we have to radically re imagine what do i mean by that? that is not okay just for us to really continue to engage as we were ever engaging right now. yes, we've got a boat. yes, we got organized,

but that's not enough. what we have to do is radically, we imagine every single system in this country recognized that was all formed out in the contents of white male page white, racist patriarchy. and that we've got to create systems that are literally going to be designed to be inclusive and to create us and get us back, get us to a more reflective representative democracy. so those are the things that we have to do. we have to respond. we have to resist and we have to re a match latasha ari there. thanks so much for joining me. is the great conversation . everybody that is our show up for it will be back ah

ah ah stories of hope and inspiration. short documentary east from around the world that celebrate carries and resilience in the times of tom leon. out he was select oh,

now is it revealing eco friendly solutions to come back? threats to our planet on al jazeera, with the city and it's a algae 0 world, meets the italian photography, exploring the long lasting love story between the city of naples and football. like on diego morrow, dawn, men, and when i left the diego with endless and unconditional madonna in naples on al jazeera ah hello i, mariam noisy in london.