Skip to main content

tv   Inside Story  Al Jazeera  November 30, 2022 10:30am-11:01am AST

10:30 am
john gongs final module successfully dogs. earlier this month, the soon jo 15th 3 astronauts will now spend 6 months working and living on the so called heaven's palace, joe, the ard, we are more the way the main purpose of the mission is to verify the space stations capacity to support crew rotation realised the 1st crew rotation in orbit and install and test equipment and conduct space based scientific and technological experiments. young. why should yankee china put its 1st astronauts into space in 2003? since then, it's land that a rover on the moon, returns lunar samples, earth and successfully launched anti satellite ripples. yeah, the did hear the hoc hand arc formula the bought the television was live broadcasting, young louise return in 2003. i had great respect and admiration for him this heedless, planted in me for the 1st time. being an astronaut, the 1st thing is that you can make a greater contribution to the country and you can fly higher and further on you.
10:31 am
last year, beijing launched the most space missions of any country, as it takes one more step towards what president sees in pinks is, is his eternal dream for china to become a space power. alex beard al jazeera. ah, and let's take you through some of the headlines here and al jazeera, now nato foreign ministers meeting in romania capital are discussing air defense systems for ukraine. on tuesday western allies pledged the support key of through the winter after russia targeted electricity, lines of water bumping stations. at least 2 people are dead and several injured in a bomb blast. and the pakistani city of quatre a police patrol team was the apparent target. it comes after the pakistan taliban ended a seas file with the government in china. protesters of fort with police and the southern manufacturing hub of one joe as anger overcoat restrictions continues.
10:32 am
some of the demonstrations have taken place in beijing and shanghai. the biggest wave of civil disobedience since president she gin pin took power a decade ago, like former australian prime minister scott morrison has been reprimanded by a piece for secretly appointing himself to several senior ministries during the pandemic is the 1st time parliament has officially censured the former prime minister, it's, i acknowledge that the non disclosure of arrangements is cause unintentional offence and extended apology to those who were offended. but mister speak to, i do not apologize for taking action, especially prudent redundancy action in a national crisis in order to save lives. and to save livelihoods, calla should never be abused. this was an abuse of power. and a trashing. i'll bear democracy. the man who murdered one of south africa's leading
10:33 am
anthea passed high back to his has been stabbed in prison. janice shall lose was due to be released on parole on 1st day after nearly 3 decades in jail. he was attacked by a fellow inmate and now in stable condition. in the u. s. to leaders of the right wing of keepers group of been convicted of seditious conspiracy. the jury found stewart rhodes and kelly mags instigated the tax block congress from certifying jo by these election victory as we move into the 3rd round at the great stage. some teams can breathe easy, knowing their place in the no county already secured the others. they know that journey is coming to an end. for many, it's time to dig deep and focus is there still plenty to play. catch up with his aims around the world, a returning artifacts to their countries of origin,
10:34 am
one in london has sent back its entire collection of panini barnes's to nigeria is it's one example of a trend of historic items being returned from across europe. the middle east of the americus. so how can other countries ensure that their cultural treasures are given back and can go on display for generations to come? this is inside story. ah, hello, i'm adrian finnegan. welcome to the program. london's holamen museum has returned its collection of been bronze is to nigeria. they were stolen in the late 18 hundreds by british colonial troops. after they invaded the kingdom of benign it was now my jerry, up, the artifacts ended up in museums in europe and the united states and african states have sought their return for decades. but the museum is still keeping hold
10:35 am
of hundreds of the statues. now to say was harry forces started off with this report. a major moment in a long campaign in 18. 97 british soldiers sto thousands of finely wrought artifacts like this from the van kingdom of been in modern day nigeria. now, london's haldeman museum is returning these 6 pieces and signing over the ownership of a 66 other so called been in bronzes in its collection to a noble this object to be displayed in museums for people to see people from outside the country to come. i see in the context of where they have been looted is a 70 cent moment for us. for now, there is 6 deliberate gaps in the museums. display cases mall will follow with plans for a significant number of artifacts to remain on an extended loan from the german government. at the resurgence of the black lives matter movement in 2020 leading to sort of more concerns about how we accounted for the provenance of objects. so it
10:36 am
was a kind of natural outgrowth into a tipping point. it's here though, the british museum in london were the largest single collection of items taken from beneath. and the 900 century remains more than 900 individual objects. the museum says it was to ensure that collection is shared as widely as possible. it isn't though, talking about returning one major stumbling block is written into british law and $963.00 active parliament, forbidding the museum from disposing of its exhibits with just a few clearly defined exceptions. in the statement, the museum emphasized its collaborative work in my area, saying we actively engage with partners through the bending dialogue group and the digital beneath initiative. while research and cultural exchange initiatives, also key priorities that in recent years, other institutions in scotland, france, germany, and elsewhere have been returning items from nobody in bronze collections. over the years the debate has taken in concerns over security and conservation and legit
10:37 am
area. but increasingly it's become one about justice and restoration nigeria as cultural custodians. so it's time for british and seasons and british politicians to write historical wrong, or if or sit al jazeera london was harry said, the ancient artifacts scattered across collections around the world are slowly being returned to their original homes. in january 5, roman artifacts stolen from the ancient city of palmera in syria were handed back. they've been camped on display in a private museum in lebanon since 2018. egypt also has a long list of stolen historical items that it once back. but that list is long and the whereabouts of many pieces unknown golden coffin of priest measurement was the it was returned to the sands of cairo. that was early after it was spotted in a celebrity photo shoot, organized by new york's metropolitan museum of art. in february, a 700 kilogram mo i a stone statue arrived back on easter island in the pacific. it
10:38 am
had been housed in a museum in chiles capital since the 19th century. ah, let's bring in our guest than that. today's discussion from london we're joined by barbie. phillips, he's the author of the book lute britain and been in bronzes and a former al jazeera correspondent from utrecht in the netherlands. yas ran burton, a senior researcher of colonial collections restitution at amsterdam free university. i'm from of sala, in sweden, luigi prodder, and assistant professor of egyptology at of sala university. couldn't be with us such antwan's. barnaby. let's start with you at the brain, bronzes have become emblematic of this whole debate about cultural antiquities and where they belong. it's. but some major western museums at a difficult position has that regardless of their intentions. yes, i think you're alluding adrian to the british museum of which has the largest
10:39 am
collection of been in bronze is of all, almost a 1000 done, of course, which has a unique symbolic importance in this discussion. but indeed, in so many other discussions to do with recitation and provenance, because it is the national museum of the country, which was response also or for looting these items. i think events have moved very, very quickly. and as you say, they've left the british museum badly. isolated, just 3 or 4 years ago, the british museum was working together with other western museums and that reached a sort of compromise deal with their counterparts in nigeria, which the british museum was quite happy with, whereby they will gain to lend back parts of that. then in bronze collection in rotation, but things have moved on incredibly quickly and suddenly a major weston museum which is not offering to give back. it's been in bronze is it's finding itself very much under the spotlight just from booking in ill tracks
10:40 am
with so many western institutions now accepting that. returning cultural and antiquities, or at least the property titles of objects is the right thing to do. why, other, some people who vehemently oppose it still does their arguments have any merit? well, they have had merits for a long time, but things are changing and especially diffuse, changing the atmosphere. and i even would argue that r d and private connectors and some museums, they hide a little bit from the discussion as they are scared, you know, because he did the move at the moment just very much pro distribution. of course, one of the arguments has always been the ability of heritage institutions in africa, you know, to, to preserve the subjects. but this, you know, slowly it's,
10:41 am
this is peter. and i remember that say in the introduction to european media in the 90s in 2010. and so in this disability to preserve dominated news and now it's much more the right of these people working this process to get their treasures back. louise, a brother in law, where does egypt government settle the issue of restitution? as we were saying so many precious ancient egyptian artifacts have been looted over the years. the problem is that nobody really knows where many of them are right now . where does the, the egyptian government stand in terms of, or even start in terms of getting them back? well, there's been a lot of discussion about the institution to begin with, of some very high profile monuments or artifacts. i mean, we mentioned the british museum. so of course that was a tough stone, is high up on the least compatible to the parking of marbles when it comes to relationships between the british museum and greece. but beyond that,
10:42 am
i think that the, the topic is a particularly hot one, a 4 egypt and western museum institution. so also because of how much, how many legal antiquities have left the country over the last decade or so at the time of the upstream with the political upheaval. of course, there was a perfect time for antiquity, looters, and sort of like less than ethical dealer. so to ma'am illegal expert antiquities from the country, so in need of the, the government of egypt that has filed the requests for medicine to shuns and it is, it is indeed a complicated issue. i mean, something we tend to think of museums as some sort of cages where, where asian objects are, you know, put on display. but basically they just get caught in the asked about museums, our cultural institutions. and so museums change as our culture and our society is change as so the topic of an institution is very much
10:43 am
a valid topic. and i think what really matters is that we should really not think of it as a 0 sum game. and there is this tendency of imagining that if the british museum is to return to these high profile item, then it's last for the british family go international to this coming to london. but it's not that, as we heard that there is also gestures us collaborations between countries and museum institutions, long term loans or so we really should think of it's not as is it a sum game like somebody is gaining somebody's loss because it's not that we're talking about world heritage up to the bottom there are challenges. they want that for a country like nigeria here. what perhaps you could outline some of those challenges for us. i mean, there were opportunities to but what is there a danger that my julia could squander those opportunities? it's a risk. yes it is. it is a moment of incredible opportunity, but also jeopardy that going back into the past and untangled. ready what happened
10:44 am
is inevitably complicated when the british invaded the kingdom of bennett in 1897, nigeria didn't exist. nigeria was a british creation that came into existence some 17 years later. and it wasn't something necessarily that people who lived with in its territories and visits that we've seen that play out. for example, the in the case of the ban in bronze is the rock different interests within nigeria, all of whom are acutely interested in the return of the bronze is. there is a federal government where the headquarters in boucher, which talks about building a national museum when it's talked about doing it for decades. but there's no sign of it existing. there is a state government at no state which is right involved in this issue. then of course, there is the about the king of any who is the great great grandson of the man who was toppled by the british in 1897, and from whose palaces the treasures were looted to somebody who has an undoubted
10:45 am
morrow or authority. in this case, but i think in broad terms, i think you read you had it absolutely right. we shouldn't see it as a 0 sum game. it is, i believe firmly in the case of the been in bronze as needed many other charges there is, there is a, a real win win situation. there's no reason why horrible wrongs of the past shouldn't be addressed that people in countries like nigeria or donna or cameroon, shouldn't be able to reconnect with that wonderful heritage that it should be returned to them. that seems only right, but that many of these treasures are well treacherous and they should continue to circulate around the great cities of all, well, britain, new york, paris, beijing, delhi, sidney. and so you do want to pick up on, on that slowly and go back to it to something that you were saying a few moments ago. for many years, those who resisted the calls of made the tennis argument that the artifacts
10:46 am
wouldn't receive proper care if returned to places like nigeria and, and other countries from where they were stolen. i mean that, that argument as far as you're concerned is no longer valid. well, the point you said, you know, he africans would say, now finally, europeans are admitting that they have wrought these objects. and other rovers. they want to make default to define the conditions under which in these object that we given back. and if you talk with africans and it has also occurred in the beginning dialogue group, this issue of the ability to preserve, do go collect with it. you know, has been discuss wiley, and it's only because there's a certain atmosphere of trust has been created. and so the africans at me themselves think there is a problem and disrespect, but we should leave it to then to sol. louise, you perhaps you can clear something up for me for and if you can we'll we'll,
10:47 am
we'll put it to to your son a barnaby. can you explain the legal differences between the terms restitution, which we've mentioned a lot so far, the program returned and where the term good conscience comes into it? well, the word the word good could be i can definitely tell you about the word good conscience . i mean it's so, so like trying to differentiate between or restitution like legal issues and also i think alicia so, so for example, the distribution of illegally as michael the antiquity. so you mentioned this earlier on in the program, the coughing of america, the metropolitan museum. i can tell you for the fact within my professional environment and when it comes to music creators and academics, nobody would ever acting but faith that are serious problems with the antiquity market. so the documents of the coffin had been completely and made up and falsified. hence, at once, the truth came to the surface. the coffin was straight away,
10:48 am
returned to the government of egypt and it's legitimate owners. but the problem here goes beyond the idea of legal america, the ation and where the legal rights standing. so sabbatical leads us about reparation of historical wrong. so again, the legal entity is that in the past and perhaps the signed contract and, and handed over antique, which is to european powers that those legal entity is no longer exist. thinking about again, the british museum, and in this case the partner marble so well at the time greece was part of the ottoman empire. so the official authorities in the end answer to part the powers in east them will the same. in fact, also in the 19th century for egypt, it was a problem of the ottoman empire. so that's really are some that's really actually the problem that i think is more difficult to define. again. ready where i think that nobody will disagree when it comes to repatriate in the legal antiquities. the problem is the ethical issues. and so again, where do we decide how far do we decide to go?
10:49 am
ready when trying to fix the wrong simplicity, luigi, i just want to ask you a little sidetracked here for a moment. there are cases where valuable artifacts have been moved in order to preserve and to protect them at times of conflict, especially in recent times in the middle east. tell us you your experience of that and how it differs from the case of been in bronze isn't another stolen artifact. i'm thinking in particular about places like palmera and how in times of conflict you protect sights of archaeological significance. there is a major issue. i mean, yes, bonita is a, is a good case about my, 1st of all in that case, much of it was an architecture and monuments. so how do you move to protect those and also idea that moving antiquities to someone else, keep them safe, especially to some other countries? well, it's highly arbitrary. and many people will actually object and see that a lot of antiquities, including egyptian antiquities,
10:50 am
where lost during world war 2 in europe met plenty of addiction collection. i can mention in germany live sick, but also barely in plenty of fantastic antiquities. we only have photographs of them because they were destroyed doing the, the bombing. so we're to, so in the case that those things would have been much safer, had to stayed back in egypt and in other countries in, in asia, in asia, as opposed to being in europe. so once again, where do you trace these line? it's highly arbitrary and that's also that he's got once again of repeating man patronizing attitudes of the pastor. yes. not all artifacts in western museums were stolen or taken by force. how does that complicate the discussion that we're having here? well, it complicates particular problems research. if i, if you will allow me to give an example to belgian federal government, they have developed a law which says that objects that proven to has been stolen from combo, for instance,
10:51 am
a become automatically the property of the democratic republic of congo. so this property title is transferred. now they have investigated this, especially for the major ethnic museum near brussels. and they have about 80000 objects from cornwall. and they have calculated that both these 80883 are proven to have been stolen. now that means, and they argued at $45.00 thousands, they have been corrected. they have been collected in a correct way. and 35000. they do not know they still have to investigate. now this is a big, big problem because there is very little documentation about this object. so probably we will never know precisely whether this is booty or not, or whether this was k to horror, or if you know, acquired in indisputable manner. so how do we handle that?
10:52 am
and in my view, you know, the discussion in europe is currently very much focused on more and our feelings of shame of guilt, maybe about how we appropriate them. and maybe should be much more oriented towards the needs of the countries of origin for collections that they need. and if i may give an example, i know gets d indonesia to form a dust colony as to she committee. and they work now along this line. and then you say, what do we need to have the present address, collection of our own cultural and historical past? finally, we, we heard in harrison ford earlier on about this 963 law, which prevents the british museum returning some, not all, but some of the artifacts in its possession. to what extent is the british government in particular, passing the buck at the department foot for digital culture, media, and sports in the u. k. a said,
10:53 am
decisions relating to the care and management of their collections are matter of the trustees of each museum should, should be more government intervention here, a given policy here to, to guide how museums act. i think the british government is being a bit disingenuous that yes so i mean just just a few people in the british museum act that prevents the british museum from permanently returning or accessing as music. people say objects in its collection with a few exceptions for which the law has changed in recent years, objects, stone, and during the holocaust and human body parts human remains would. of course, if the law can change for those exceptions, why can't it change for say, objects new to during the colonial period asked the point is that the british museum directors and trustees in the past have hidden behind this law. it's been
10:54 am
a convenient excuse for inactivity nowadays. i'm not quite sure that is the case. in fact, i see the british museums around the divided place and some actuators within it are distinctly uncomfortable about the situation they're in, but they are unable to permanently return. the been in bronze is all for that matter. the partner models into the law. ready changes, and that would require a vote in parliament. and if you look at the current configuration of the british parliament with the conservative majority, that seems extremely unlikely to happen short of a general election and a new political configuration. so it is a national political issue, which generally does leave use in like the british museum, but also other museums the dna than the national gallery, hamstrung on this issue. undoubtedly, i want to spend the last few minutes the program talking about the future. louis,
10:55 am
she, you were talking earlier on about about how the world can continue to enjoy and learn from these objects. should we know, expect you think, to see ancient antiquities presented in digital form rather than in post. and you've talked about a collections being loaned out to what extent does that water down the impact? and if we're seeing them in bits, if you like, not a full connection because it's been loaned out. does that detract from the educational value of visiting of museum? well, there's no doubt so that this is the direction where we are aiming in the future. there would be more and more amusing experiences more than just. ready walking through i time so that it will be more also replica. so because of how now we are able to create a perfect quality replica. so, but these also doesn't concern adjust artifacts and objects in museum collections. these also concerns are monuments. i mean, if we think about some of the earliest
10:56 am
a story or 2 examples in the caves of law school in france, nobody can actually visit the regional because just human presence. that will mean that the, the, the decay and permanent damage to the region out pigments or so everybody of, it's a replica. we have similar situations in egypt. for sam, at the credit of tombs that are too fragile. and so yes, in the that, that's the direction and i don't think that detracts to the educational value of the experience actually in a way can add to it because of the multimedia approach that we can use. if nothing else, i do appreciate that in my detract from that emotional connection, that one might have of the water is regional in ancient object. so there are that are still things that we need to fix, that. this is also part of the conversation that we still need to have we have and so to get. ready you know out yet. ok, yes. we have about a minute left on the program. what will the museum of the future look like?
10:57 am
well, i'm not sure whether you'd have digital objects because for digital objects to, to link up of d, luigi sanders, that did the objects we should distinguish between on the one hand ceremonial religious object and on the other, maybe household utensils. now for the letter digital re bet creation can be a solution. but for the 1st, i know for most countries of origin, they won't be originals to come back. and then if they allow it, we can, we can have made digital copays for in our machines. but i think in, in them our, the museum of the future, it should not be about objects. first of all, it should not be about storage. first of all, it should be about the relationship between former colonized and former colonizers and his relationship in the relationship who discuss, for instance,
10:58 am
can we shall. and so, so remains, can we show monies? can we show the sensitive pictures, photographs, et cetera? so it's a mental dialogue for the museum of the future that i think is a great place to leave it. many thanks. indeed gentlemen, for being with us. bobby phillips in london, yasemin burton, the new trex, ann louise, he prato, and apollo. as always, thank you for watching. don't forget you can see the program again any time by visiting our website of al jazeera dot com for further discussion. join us at our facebook page that's at facebook dot com forward slash ha, inside story. as you can join the conversation on twitter handle at ha, inside story for me, adrian finnegan, the team here. and so how, thanks for watching to see it. a new series, exploring how traditional knowledge from indigenous community is helping tackle to
10:59 am
these environmental catastrophe. we journey across new mexico and meet those who fight to protect their culture and raise awareness of the impact of climate change and pollution on their secret land. first nations frontline native nation voices of survival analogies. the western libya is home to libya's river people, the embassy scattered across the full so mountains, our old amazonian cities like this one. and then you get a music where the original inhabitants of libya here in digital city, there's evidence that dates back centuries and got that. he came to power. he showed to everybody's, our culture became illegal to name our children music names. he removed our culture from history books, but we preserved our culture and secret younger view played an important role in
11:00 am
the revolution that toppled longtime leader martin, that the outlaw their time by language now after more than a decade, they are able to open celebrating their heritage and culture, although libya has been engulfed in violence and political divisions since 2011, the amazon, you'd say they're happy with their new found freedom. there's a story being spot fantasy with being sold. the notion that you offset all the ca, the, we generate does carbon offsetting actually work. what is being done isn't worth sitting in the profit is net 0, just the catch raise. net 0 missions and that's there. i need you to a climate controlled poly re examines the myths on delusions in the struggle against climate breakdown. all hailed the planet episode won on al jazeera ah.

41 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on