and as the party are sad when you go so to find some sort of a compromise solution with a failure. on monday, sir b as defense minister met soldiers as the army was put on its highest level of combat readiness. this government video shows millichef butch of ich, talking with troops and inspecting military equipment close to the course of a border. the short term goal is to full the muscles with hey, poorer, the surgeon beat also to show that the serbia and in particular the serbian president out on the role sheet as funding the national interest. and the interest of gospel serves in what the goals are at. so thomas problems move in, kosovo has been particularly tense since november when hundreds of ethnic serve employees of the police, a judiciary resigned. they were angry about christian banning. license plates issued by bel great. a policy eventually scrapped, and this month to local elections insert majority areas were postponed. after many

sib said they boycott the vote. letty barbara al jazeera. ah, this is out to sarah, and these are the top stories. russia says it will ban oil exports to countries that set price caps on its energy products. the decree will come into effect from february. early this month, the european union at g 7 and australia agreed on a cap for russian crude oil as a way of cutting the cremins revenue streams. u. s. supreme court has ruled to keep board of restrictions that have blocked thousands of migrants from entering the country from the mexico border. the rule known as title 42 was imposed during the code 19 pandemic in 2020, and allowed border officials to rapidly expel migrants. court trying to cross in the us from mexico. i want us correspond that can be hawkins, is falling developments from washington, dc. yes,

president saying the court is not going to decide on this matter until june. that's typically when the supreme court rulings come out after hearing oral arguments. and the president goes on further to say that title $42.00 must be enforced. in other words, what he's saying is echoing what the white house press secretary is also said in an official statement from the white house that until then, the white house is going to comply with title 40 to taiwan. will extend compulsory military service from 4 months to one year to counter threats from china . on monday, dozens of chinese plains crossed into ty, pays defense soon. the biggest daily incursion in years present try in when says taiwan wants peace but needs to be able to defend itself. at least 64 people have been killed in the weather related incidents in north america. as a severe winter storm continues to batter the region. new york state is one of the worst affected areas present. joe biden proved an emergency declaration to provide

federal support and benjamin netanyahu was moved a step closer to forming what's expected to be the most right. when government, in israel's history, as after parliament passed controversial legislation allowing politicians previously convicted of offences without serving jail time to join the cabinet. or those are the headlines. more news here after inside story. ah north korean drones that breach south korean air space, the latest hostile act in a year that seen killing young testify at 90 missiles. what's the secretive nation trying to achieve and

a harsh it's sole and it's western allies response without escalating into all this is, it's i story. ah, ah, and i walk into the program. i'm iran con, south korea spends big on defense with a hostile neighbor across the border. so failure to shoot down the north korean drones in its air space on monday has caused some alarm. the military has apologized and president yoon. so gill says, the incident underlines a lack of redness. we'll be discussing this and the wide attentions in the region with our guests shortly. but 1st in this came reports from sol, a brazen incursion by north korea and to south korean. aerospace has left a sense of unease here and so so much so that the military has issued a rare apology for failing to shoot down any of the 5 enemy rounds at flew and

south korean aerospace on monday, a 4 of those drones flew over a con while island on the west coast, while the 5th flew past a border town pied you while flying in as close as the northern tip of sol, where the presidential office stands, some concern that it may have got gotten away with some of the pictures of the presidential office, so the military says it has no such data. the joint chiefs of staff in its apology underline that it is very difficult to detect and to target in civilian territory, drones that are smaller than 3 meters in size, even as they promised to bolster what they can, including potentially running air defense drills at the joint chiefs level the president, humans hunger meanwhile, and his 1st comments at a cabinet level meeting this morning. recognize that military preparedness was simply not there. that training had lagged in the past years as he called for the

creation of a military drone unit. in fact, to bring it up as soon as possible that would feature stealth capabilities as well as future technology unit kim for insights story. now the joins the latest military activity on the korean peninsula. young young has tested at least 90 cruise and ballistic missile. so fall in 2022 more than in any of the year, including the 1st launch over japanese territory. since 2017, the sheriff forces caused a concern among its neighbors. now in response, south korea hold joint life. i joules with 0 i the us extending the military exercises by several days. and japan is increased. it's 2023 defense budget by 20 percent or record a $55000000000.00. that's a shift away from the passport policies in place since world war 2. ah, let's bring in our guess

a mason richie is an associate professor of international politics at hancock, university of foreign studies in soul. he joins us from birmingham, alabama. joining us by skype from london is edward hell, his electra in politics at new college at university of oxford, and lawrence corbett joins us way. skype from washington d. c. he's a senior fellow at the center for american progress. and a former us assistant secretary of defense, a warm welcome to your flight to begin with. mason ritchie in birmingham, alabama. mason. there's no other way of reading this other than north korea tested south korea's defensive capabilities. and one is that right? i think that's a fair argument, and i think that this drone incursion by north korea shows something that frankly speaking many people had already expected. that there were holes and saw 3 in air defense, particularly for these smaller drones. for instance, this has been

a pretty big embarrassment for the ministry of national defense for a south korean military. it also exposes, i think, several years or perhaps even more than i neglect on this type of, you know, relatively asymmetric tourist at north korea represents for south korea. it also falls into a line of errors and mistakes that we've seen. the soft green military make over this year, including and missile response. south korea made that went wrong earlier this year where one of its own missiles that was supposed to sort of counter the narrative of a north korean missile test. i ended up circling back and blowing up on south korean territory near a populated area. so i think this is definitely a wakeup call to south korea that it needs to up its game militarily. if it wants

to continue to deter north korea from these kinds of publications in the future, let's bring in laura called south korea is a key us ally. the u. s. must be looking at this and going where, where's all the money going with all our support for south korea go with these small drones. they've managed to mount an incursion. well, there's no doubt about it. you've got to remember that during the trumpet administration, we downplayed our security relationship with south korea back president trump was talking about taking all of the american troops out of there. we finally started, you know, having exercises with them again. and i do say that that's one of the reasons why the north launch these attacks is because they're concerned about the u. s. and south korea working together and increasing their rub, mill mil, military capability. and they'll forget, in addition to this, i mean,

they've been conducting an awful lot of missile tests like think of something like 90 in this, in the past, past past year. so, and then finally this had held for 5 years. and that certainly is a step in the right direction, but i think my colleague is correct. they're trying to show that their south korea is not that good. and they're probably also concerned that the japanese have that ability already built. edward how. what does this mean for north korea? is this a new resurgent confident north korea that we're witnessing? yes, so i think what's important about in mind is that even though this is not the 1st time in recent memory that we've seen, nor could use it drones, we saw north korea do 72017 on particularly in light of the deployment of the, the thought the anti missile defense system in sol. i think what this will present

is kim john and kimberly jane calling to from phil. what was basically a shopping list, the wish list of where can we of technology, although unconventional weapons that he outlined the 8 party congress last year. so we saw better warheads, new types of the continental ballistic missiles, ranging up to 15000 kilometers solid propellant. miss songs and also the coldness and combat groans. so the laughter has all usually been taped off on. yes, all of the reasons that my 2 colleagues have mentioned to show that the south korean defense system is weak as a way of provoking the u. s. south korean lions, but it's interesting to show how although north korea house and exactly responded

to the really the most recent drone incursion, north korea house responded to japan's recent pledges to increase in defense spending to 2 percent of its g. d. p. by 2027. so i think for north korea, this is another step. further came the aim, ultimately to desire the status all not only a nuclear state, but also a state with expanded scope and sophistication of a diverse range of capability. it will get into the ethan. he's saying in just a moment. i want to bring mason richey and head. there is this idea of blowback um where the u. s. makes a play and then that kind of backfires on them present. donald trump r lawrence cove just mentioned that he was not quite a supporter of the kim regime, but he was, you know, certainly talking to them. and then he suddenly con, about the pitcher now. but the north koreans are re surgeon and they see themselves

as being able to mount attacks. like this is a fair assessment why i would, despite the fact i'm not in any way it donald trump fan to be on the record. i wouldn't, i wouldn't say anywhere, you're a fan of north korea, but you know, i do think that if anything, what this probably shows, you know, the last 5 years and arguably going back farther 10 to 20 years or even longer isn't no one knows ministration and washington has a good answer for how to deal with north korea. it's a really, really difficult problem. and frankly speaking, it's also hard for sol, obviously. in fact, arguably, it's even harder for small. they have them much more complex relationship in north korea because the crimson soul is divided and obviously because north korea is a much more immediate, indirect threat to south korea. so no one has

a good answer for north korea and north korea, frankly speaking, exploits that and so they exploit that. sometimes through the use of strength, through your testing icbm, through provocations which we saw, for instance in 2010 when they blew up a south korean corvette. and when they show islands to the west of sole and in ton. so sometimes they engage in provocative military behavior, whether it be tests or whether the kinetic actions. sometimes they use what researchers are referred to, the tyranny of the week in order to try to symmetrically irritate or in some cases, terrorize their adversaries. and these are extremely difficult and sometimes a symmetric provocations in a symmetric strategies that north korean gauges and that are difficult to respond to. so i don't necessarily claim too much, you know,

trump or obama for him or bush before him. no one's had a good answer for how to deal with north korea. the same thing is true and sole, but the fact is better as the north korean threat is growing and north korea seems to be on the threshold of convincing the rest of the world. in some sense that its possession of nuclear weapons is normalized, that it should be treated something like a mixture of israel, pakistan and india. and the more that, that is the case, the more that nor 3 is going to have room for these kinds of incursions. drones crossing the border military, do you mark asian line miss just in the east, the mischief in the west sea, and other types of actions that are unfortunately going to cause potential inadvertent escalation. only korean, gentler. and once that happens, all bets are off because once you start and ask for his borrow, it's awfully hard to stop lawrence cope. what do you think of that? no one in d. c has

a good idea of deal on how to deal with north korea to great. yeah, i think my colleague his absolutely correct. because no matter how you handle it, it's going to be difficult. we don't want another korean war. obviously not that we would like north korea not to become a nuclear power, but we didn't want to pakistan to be call the nuclear power either. and i think we're going to have to accept the fact that there are nuclear power and deal with it in terms of the forces. we have the exercises that had that we conducted as also been mentioned, the japanese are increasing their defense capabilities. so while north korea certainly is getting, you know, somewhat more powerful or closer to a nuclear weapon, this security is not an increase. if the united states it and south korea begin to increase their military cooperation, japan does, and less up again,

as the north koreans are also one of the 2 countries in the world providing arms to russia. here, during this war in ukraine. edward hell, let's talk about containment if there's the real strategy to be able to deal with north korea. the cost of doing business in that region means that we're just going to have to accept the north korea will now attacks like this. and as long as they don't escalate us the best we can hopeful yes, i mean i see that that is a very pessimistic scenario. but to reiterate what has been said and to develop on the points based on my colleagues. all we getting to that sort of point, i mean, i just want to, we've, we've, we've discussed different types. it's called mischief the uncover cations at north korea has engaged in. i think we also need to decide, but domain as well. i mean cyber warfare, as we've seen,

particularly throughout this year, but also beforehand has allows, know, who to escalate, quote unquote pensions without really causing much change to the status quo. and by the status quo, i mean, any particular form of response from the international community. you mentioned the idea of containment, and you mentioned the idea of whether in fact we are basically going to have to accept north korea as a new state. well, one of the concerns at the moment is that given the ongoing focus of the united nations security council on russia's continued war in ukraine. actually if north korea was to conduct the 7th new test that many on the list and researches and policymakers have been calling and predicting for many months. now this would present a fundamental weakening of the united nations security council,

but also would not get away with it. more so than in previous years. most likely. yes. so we're seeing north korea take advantage, particularly now of a we can international order and the we can sort of locked in the united nations security council focused on ukraine, which north creek can leverage to a increase and accelerate it's 12 occasions. whether that's miss sol, testing whether that's during warfare, whether that cyber war or, or otherwise. we have mentioned japan, let's get into that now. mason richey, the idea that japan is now escalating quite massively its own arms program, or perhaps in response to what north korea is doing, but certainly as part of its own regional security. it must be worried about north korea. and china though, is there

a danger of an arms race more significant that we've seen as ever before? i don't think that there is a danger of an arms race. there is an ongoing arms race. it's. it's happening as we speak. i in japan is going to raise its defense spending within the next 5 years. at least that's the plan significantly whether or not they actually hit that 2 percent threshold, i think is, is perhaps a bit of an open question. but and more importantly, how that money is spent, i think, matters quite a bit. and whether or not this goes into procuring new systems and whether or not that's done with with wisdom and intelligence and how that fits in with japan. larger evolving, east asian pacific defend strategy is of course a separate question. but it's happening is happening in japan, which is developing or is going to be developing these counter strike capabilities

. which would obviously be able to hit north korea as well as china. and in some sense, i think actually the chinese threat from the perspective of japan is really the more salient one than your 3 all there. north korea is clearly, i important, secondary worry south area has been increasing its defense expenditures for at least the last 6 or 7 years. if i remember correctly by every year, anywhere between 5 and 8 percent saw 3 is pouring money into its defense. it's a national defense. you might ask where some of that money has been going to the extent that they don't seem to be able to have an answer for these smaller is the metric threat. but they are putting money into submarines. they're putting money into potentially a light aircraft carrier. they put money into a $35.00 of course. they're putting money into unmanned system as they're putting money into c 4 i s r. so, intelligence reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities south are you doing that?

we always see china massively increasing its military expenditures and growing it's on nuclear arsenal going forward. so that's taking place in north korea is an instigator of this as well as we've seen, you know, with the development of the walk on 17 icbm, which professor, how referenced earlier with it can range all of the continental united states with, you know, a nuclear payload how accurate that is and how reliable it is a separate question, but to some of your we have to assume that it probably functions. so there is an arms race going on high in the region. and i think one of the responses that we would like to see perhaps if you're washington d. c would be increased trilateral cooperation between top 3 of the united states in japan. and not only in terms of how it is that the alliance shares information with each other or how the alliances share information with each other. but also particularly looking towards a combined, or at least in part,

to integrated missile defense posture. but that's something that's going to have to move extremely slowly because south korean japan aren't particularly good terms and a lot of ways. and so this type of defense cooperation is a relatively tricky endeavor, domestically in both tokyo angel. well, let's bring in lawrence called lauren's. you mentioned earlier, this idea that there is a very difficult way of dealing with north korea the perhaps we don't have a grasp on, but is there anything immediate that the u. s. can do now in dealing with north korea, is there a short term right now? solution well basically i think make it clear to doubt that if they don't stop this behavior, we're going to, i'd cars is south korea to respond. don't forget, after the sucked incursion here, the south koreans did go into north korea. and i think we need to make it clear that in a conventional war whist, ah, south korea, they would not,

they would not do well. i think the north koreans are also thinking that everybody's focus on taiwan, so they can get away with this now. and of course, as you know that, that if you look at the united states national security strategy, it's all about china and taiwan. so i, b, i can't get into kim's heads when i do say he thinks we word. busy word this distracted and it's important that we convey to him when the japanese, if they go through with this, they'll be the 3rd largest military budget in the world. and is this something that he wants given the history for you to change your pad? and the korea's edward hell, is there a way of bringing the north koreans into the league of nations of to use a very old fashion to? yeah, i think most interesting is that what we need to understand now does not have

a good time for north korea. to north korea does not want to engage in any kind of dialogue. let's see me at the moment. the north has always faced it tone policy based on this idea that it's preferred outcomes will be met. you know, north korea will only join any form of dialogue, negotiation, whatever, when it feels that it's come, get it desired outcomes. we saw this in hanoi in 20. 19 the 2nd summit between kim dungan and trump, which ended in conclusively because north korea was not getting walter wanted from the united states, which, which at that point was on particular using all of my particular sanctions. is there any way that north korea can come back and join the negotiating table at the moment? i think it's not in north korea interest to do so at the moment. you know,

as we speak, the, the, the end of the party play number, the work is policy has just begun. we've seen kingdom gun discuss issues of crises happening in the, in the, in the north clear in the, in, across this year. and usually what we see, so we already talk, sorry i would, we are going out of time and i do want to bring in mason rich. you very quickly, mason. the one country that we haven't really got into and talks about is, is china. does china have a role to play in bringing the korea to the table or they know interested either? it's a very tricky, complicated question and it probably depends to some degree on what you know, what point you're asking and what you know, what he mean when you talk about the role that china has. but the short answer to that is china. it could, if it wanted to make life extremely difficult for the regime to the point that it could very likely cause the regime to fall in the way that it would do that would be to shut off. well supplies coming in through pipelines from china. however,

it has no interest in seeing a failed state, especially in nuclear hill state. and of course, is nominally an ally of nor 3 if you have mutual defense treaty. and thirdly, you know, north china has no interest in the moment, at least in bringing its buffer state to heal. it's not particularly enthusiastic about north korea, having functioning nuclear program and having nuclear weapons. and indeed, you know, from a north korean perspective, i think in the back of north prius said they probably look at those nuclear weapons as an insurance against chinese meddling in, nor 3 and affairs as much as they look at it. or at least in part with respect to how they look at it as a tool to be used against the u. s. and saw 3 alliance. but at the end of the china has limited leverage. because north korea is an independent minded state. there's a lot of what it wants to do, and there is the sort of tyranny of the weak, where china, you know, it becomes too involved in trying to manage north 3 and affairs. we'll see its own back bar effect. and if it goes to foreign,

might end up causing instability on the korean peninsula, which is what china once, absolutely to avoid. and so that extend it actually how you all to we wanted to leverage. i want to thank all august nathan richey, edward, how and lawrence cove and i want to thank you as well for watching. now you can see the program again, anytime by the single website i was there, dot com. and for further discussion, go to a facebook page at facebook dot com, forward slash asia inside story. and you can also join the conversation on twitter . handle is a j inside story for me and run con, and the whole team here. the ah

and on january 1st, croatia will become the 20th country to join the europe. but after a recent draw in public support for the new cavity, how will correlations adapt to the changes? and will it mean higher prices. in depth news and analysis on al jazeera join the debate. when we talk about climate change in africa, we should focus on adaptation knocked mitigation on air or online at your voice. it shouldn't be explained that what that love, what not is being right now is being everything that is going to benefit them more revealing new perspectives like getting this out of proportion. no, no, his reach and has power is what is this proportionate, the stream where a global audience becomes a global community on al jazeera, a journey,

both dog to present. you know, there's a very, for everything. there's a lot of corruption and a beautiful lake of beauty for many years to be very patient and already so. so the say as assembly, because i was introduced sure though when my father and my mother were arching for king for the personal story to discover the source of one of the most expensive commodities sent from headland on al jazeera, i care about healthy us engaging with the rest of the world, i cover foreign policy, national purity. this is a political im house. here is the conflict. are we telling the good story? we're really interested in taking you into a place that you might not visit otherwise. and to actually feel as if you were there ah, i'm carriage on.