of covert every day in the us and we know very little about who these people are, why they're falling through the cracks. and where there may have been missed opportunities along the way, where whether it be vaccination or whether it be, be up to date on vaccination, whether it be access to antivirals. this is important to course correct or implementation and our response to the panoramic. even now 3 years into the, into it for angelina. any progress made fighting cove. it is too late for her loved one. my father was a good, genuine kind, gentle sweet, generous person. and he didn't deserve to die like that, or any of the people who continue to 3 years later, gabriel is on auto al jazeera new york. ah.

so again, i'm fully battle with the headlines on al jazeera, the united nations deputy secretary general has told al jazeera the right, the women and girls of gan, his son can not be abandoned. i mean, mohammed has just returned from a high level meeting with taliban. she says her delegation made some progress on women's rights, but much remains to be done. some exemptions are being made to the edicts that have covered the health sector. and i think that's because the international community, it's particularly the partners who are funding this, were able to show the implications and the impact of your women to women's services, particularly childbirth getting food across and very harsh when to conditions. not enough. that's just the very beginning. we've opened up a crack and we hope that through the reversals, we can eventually get to a stage where you neutralize those edicts and women a back in school and girls. and of course, in the workplace, a danish far right politician has burnt a copy of the koran outside the turkish embassy in sweden's capital,

stockholm police gave permission for the rally to go ahead. all this is prompted anchor to cancel a planned visit by the swedish defense minister. re baltic states have hit out at germany for failing to provide battle tanks for ukraine. estonia, lithuania in latvia, say germany was a leading the lead a european power and a special responsibility to help ukraine. the u. s. is designating russia's wagner group as an international criminal organization. it says about $50000.00 of its mercenaries are fighting in ukraine in peru. dozens of people have been injured as police confronted crowds demanding the resignation of president. deena bold watty want has accused them of trying to seize power. a palestinian man has been shot dead. brian is rarely settler in the occupied west. spank video footage posted on line appears to show him chasing a settler who then stopped and shot him. is really for to say he was shot to prevent his fabbing. and witnesses in the northern to gray region of ethiopia,

say troops from neighboring eritrea have started withdrawing from several areas. the presence of erie tree and troops in the region had been seen as a major challenge to a piece deal signed between ethiopian government and take ry forces. those are the headlines on al jazeera up front is up next, stay with us. in depth analysis of the days headlines from around the world to try, right extremely, there is real early to be tackled as soon as possible informed opinions. why is the serial awful dis, and concerned about this rather small room turkey anthea room on really room through the little 30 wishes and so forth. frank assessments, you know, there was a joke about the interim government or it's not interim, nor does it go inside story. on al jazeera, the united states constitution holds the separation of church and state as sacrosanct. it's a pillar of american democracy at

a poor facet of its identity. however, in recent years, there's been an undercurrent of religious rhetoric and symbology permeating political discourse. christian nationalism is a term you might have heard on the news or in speeches from some on the right. but what does it really in? is it on the rise this week and up front special? we take a closer look at christian nationalism and how it's affecting politics and civil rights in the united states. ah, joining us to discuss this is anthia butler, chair of religious studies at the university of pennsylvania, an author of white evangelical racism, the politics of morality in america. amanda tyler, executive director of the baptist joint committee and contributing author to the christian nationalism and the january 6th insurrection report. and kristen do may professor of history at calvin university and author of jesus and john wayne, how white evangelicals corrupted

a faith and fractured and nations and provocative titles around here. it can be a thank you so much for joining me. i want to start with you 1st, but the term christian nationalism has cropped up at various times in u. s. history. and some would argue it's a, had a consistent present since the countries founding awful connections to white supremacist groups. i like the k k k, r to the more recent patriot front, a christian nationalism is by no means a new phenomenon. taking its history into account. how do you define christian nationalism as it is today? actually simply, i just defined it as people who believe that god created america for a purpose that america is special. in other words, when you are a christian nationalist, you believe that god created america as a christian nation. first of all, 2nd debt, white men who were the founders of this nation were also christian. and that 3rd, that christianity is the most important religion of all that really flies in the face of a lot of things that the founders in the front are all the founding documents.

absolutely, to arrive. disposition is fascinating. one that i've never understood. absolutely. and i think, you know, one of the things that i find troubling about this is the 2 things. actually, one is the way in which they get it all wrong about the founders and the framers and things that they've said. and what are documents, say in the declaration of independence and the constitution, you know, no religious tests, they believe in religious tests then and there's a big religious test at christianity. but at the same time, they don't want a lot of government, but they want a christian government. and so these are the things that i call the tensions within christian nationalism about christian nationalists who can't really get the story right. honor and you know, for all of us around this table, we might have different iterations of what we think christian nationalism is. but i do think it largest in very much in the history of this nation. how it was founded and why it was founded. and everyone trying to put a divine sort of approbation about america. on top of everything. christian

christian nationalism has had a revival. really struggle with the 970 when evangelists on the right kind of align themselves with the republican party. presumably in an effort to kind of galvanized an anti liberal movement take us through what's happened over the last, oh my god, it's been 50 years. i didn't realize 70 to 50 years ago. the last half century. what's happened and how the ideology has kind of all over time. so you're exactly right. so the idea that america, as a christian nation, has been around for a very long time. but what we're talking about today, the current kind of explosion of conversation around white christian nationalism really can be traced back, the 1960 in 1900 seventy's emerging in this cold war era. now just before that you had a strong sense of patriotism, right? and we had a common enemy in communism. and christian nationalism was often something that united americans together not just, not just right wing pilots. exactly,

kind of consensus era in the sixty's that starts to splinter and we have the civil rights movement, the feminist movement, and the anti war movement. and that's a we see some of these core values of patriotism, of christian america, of gender traditionalism kind of come together in an oppositional movement. so that we have people who are holding to these values are doing so over against other americans over against civil rights activists. over against feminist liberals, anti war activists, right. and so it becomes this kind of opposition on movement and allies with the modern republican party. and that's really this christian nationalism that we are seeing today. but it has been brewing for a very long time. in white, evan jellico spaces right anthea talked about kind of this mythical notion, right. this is an inaccurate understanding of our nation's past ignore. as a lot of our founding documents, they will talk about the myth of the separation of church and state. but this has been cultivated in these spaces for decades in sermons, in popular literature,

in christian film. and so it is really pervasive, and we're really seeing that the fruits of those seeds very clearly today made at christian nationalism and evangelical, is often sort of conflated, particularly in the context of trump, in the air of trump. we're kind of the followers are kind of all in the same mix, but many argue that these groups are actually not the same that they're distinct. what specifically distinguishes christian nationalists from evangelicals. well, i think it's important to note the christian nationalist, is it christian nationalism as an id? ology is a problem for all of the country and it's a problem for all iterations of christianity. so while it would be convenient to say this is totally aligns with this one expression of christianity. i don't think that's accurate. i think that christians from across from all the different denominations need to wrestle with chris christian nationalism and understand how

that's different than christianity. i think that christian nationalism though can help explain why evangelists calls as a voting block white evangelicals voted in such high numbers. for trump, what makes it even genuine? even angelica? well, that's a, that's a $1000000.00 question, but i think that it's become a term that's more about identity than about religion, especially for white evangelicals. and that's because they're voting in such walk step for a figure like tromp and then now for trump accolades, who are running in this, in this election. so it is more about an identity that carries with it assumptions about nativism and authoritarianism. and patriarchy than it does about a religion of christianity. so it's not a particular faith claim or a particular orientation, particular theological disposition, or both. i think it's both that i think, increasingly we hear it as more of a political movement than a religious identity. and that's concerning from,

from the, the, i agree with that, i would say it this way and i'm interested to hear what christian would say to, i would say that it used to be a theological construct that lay in kind of ideas. they came out of the 17th 18th century, what, what does it mean to be evans, i'll call, you know, when we think of the word, evan galico, which is basically spread the gospel in the good news, right? this is how evan chuckles. always thought of themselves. what we see now is evan chuckle isn't being acquainted with politics. and so i've said before, i wrote an article back in 2012 about this, and i said that republicanism was a new religion. and that this was a religion that had aligned itself with evan jugglers, and i think i can explain them to me. this becomes a fascinating and confusing to me. if we say it's a political identity. yeah, we say it's rooted in a particular set of christian values around reading. the good news i get that there are competing interpretations and ideas about what it means to be christian about what the good news is about the new testament about g. i get all it it right,

but i can't imagine any iteration that makes sense and corresponds to talk. and yet evangelicals tired themselves to trump if you were evangelical of any sort, whether you are, even if you thought of it of a thought of it as a left wing idiology, if you thought it was a right wing idiology, you were a quote unquote bible thumper, and you were, you know, i mean if you were a literalist, did you, i mean there's no version of this thing that makes sense with trump's presidency. his identity, his character, his history, his say, why don't these people pick talk? somebody, please help me. i was there, i'd love to take leave and go. so you write them. evans all calls will define themselves as a theological, as a group defined by their theology. and they'll talk about things like a born, again experience and the authority of the scriptures. and i the centrality of the cross of christ, right? this is how they will define themselves, at least their leaders well. as a cultural historian, when i was looking at the history i saw that didn't really hold together. it

doesn't make sense because the vast majority of black protestants in this country, for example, could check off all those boxes. and they do not identify as evan. jessica, because it's very clever, just good, identify them as them either. most do not write them. some will claim them, but not actually, you know, they won't be in the same churches together or in the same organizations in many cases. and so i see evans alcoholism, largely as a cultural movement and if system of networks and alliances. so if you want to understand of angelica lism today, you have to look at their organizations at their, at christian publishing, at these massive industries. it's a consumer culture christian radio. and so it, it shares that, quote, unquote christian world view and a far and wide through this popular culture and through membership in these organizations. and that membership is police right. there are gatekeepers here. and it's those organizations that then unite with political organization. now the story is how do we get from this understanding of angelica lism to support of donald

trump? that's where we have to bring in the politics and the power. because within these communities, they have for half a century now cultivated this understanding that they are under threat, that they have to fight to restore christian america, and that the liberals are against them. everybody is so they need power. they need power in order to restore christian america and trump came in and he was the right guy for the job precisely because he was not constrained by traditional christian virtue. and he told them he would fight to protect christianity, and they actually called him their alternate fighting champion. he was their warrior and he would be ruthless on their behalf to preserve their supremacy. exactly. and supremacy is the right word here because there's one more thing. dad, he was for white people, period. and so this is the thing that i get at in my book is that i want people understand that evansville calls have always had probably about race. so you say

racism is it is a feature, not a book. it's a feature of this and, you know, there's one kind of history that we talk about it ever juggles, and that's great abolitionism, you know, trying to get the vote suffrage all these things, right. even with the civil rights movement, right. but there's another history about average alcoholism separating because it's wanting to have slave southern baptists, k k k who start the k k k, a pastor or re, you know, we have we fighting against king because they are evil because they are trying to, you serve the status quo, we can see how this goes, right? so by the time we get to trump, right, what have you just had before? drop or black president? brock. hussein obama, who can possibly be from america? who is, you know, you serve or who is why tea party movement happen? and then you get donald trump and all of these people who are evan chuckles. in

2016, you have a rise in people who vote for donald trump in 2020. but what studies have found one in particular, i'm sorry, i'm forgetting the name that they said more people called themselves. evan chuckle because of what happened in 2016 in not because they thought they believed in this particular kind of christianity. it's because they believed that eman jelic cole is a met, white to them. and that is the core of all of this whiteness is embedded in american . evan jacqueline, you could have black m a joke, or you could have latino evan juggles. but white evan jell calls are the cynic one, not of everything. they are it. and so as a voting block, they are the people that they go for. and let me say this very clearly, because this is where you need to understand why average others like donald trump. donald trump delivered donald trump delivered supreme court justices over 200 justices. donald trump delivered for them, he was there deliverer. and from then we say delivered supreme court justices,

we're talking about justices who would overturn roe v wade. that's right. okay. and which was the thing that they have been fighting for for a very long time. and so he got those justices. he got those justices when he lined up everything for that. so why wouldn't they go to the capital and fight for him? why wouldn't they go to the ballot box and fight for him? why wouldn't me believe that the election was a lie? because donald trump was ordained by god to be in that particular position. and so that's what evan jellico think right now who are for donald trump, chris, it in your book, jesus and john wayne, you write that evangelical support for former are present. donald trump is the combination of evangelicals embrace of militant masculinity and the callous display of power at home and abroad. those are ideas that seemed again to be at our with some of their funded mental faith claims fundamental beliefs. how do you reconcile?

how do they reconcile these things? do they attempt to reconcile? and i'd love you to weigh on this as well. i mean, how do they reconcile this stuff? yeah, i mean, they did seem to be when i 1st started this research, which was almost 20 years ago now actually i was, was looking at popular angelica books on masculinity and how to be a christian man. and this is a huge market, right? these books, some of them are selling in the millions. so vast market and people are men are studying these in churches and in small groups, what does it mean to be a christian man? why read some of these? and i was surprised because there weren't a whole lot of bible verses in these books. instead they let's hollywood heroes. they look to mel gibson's william wallace from the movie brave heart. that's their favorite. they look to cowboys and warriors and soldiers, and john wayne. right. and this not like in jesus, not jesus, right? but then what they ended up doing is they transformed jesus, they transform the jesus of the gospels into this warrior christ. now you can find some passages and revelation to work with and to build on. and then they make jesus

into the like, man on it with big muscles on tattoos, down his leg, charging into battle, wielding a bloody sword to slay his enemy. so when they're talking about following christ, right, that's the christ that they're holding up. not the christ who says, love your enemies, love your neighbor, turn the other cheek and put that sword away. and so their theological work actually being done to transform historic christian teachings in the service of their own quest for power. amanda, you said the christian nationalism was a political ideology, not a religious, didn't, as you've talked about here. but christian nationalism is distinguished from everyday political conservatism. why has this kind of nationalist ideology been attached to christianity in the u. s. in particular, there's always been this disconnect about who we say we are and who we really are. and so who we say we are, the country is the country that embraces religious freedom for all it's right there in our founding documents,

no religious test and that there will are government will remain secular so that religion can flourish. but christian nationalism which privileges christianity and says, there is a special place for christians and american society has been running alongside these ideals all the way. and so i think it's just been there for people to seize upon and try to organize around. and there is cultural lint, legitimacy still to being a christian. there is a special place, it seems, and different in elective office. all of our presidents, for instance, have all professed christianity that he was a true exactly, despite there being no religious tests for public office. and so i think that we, we see this tension in our society right now. and so there's something still a culturally current about being a christian and professing christianity that provides cover for what is really become authoritarian action in, in our current context. i want to drill down

a little bit on this question about the kind of foundational documents of the united states and how they say there's no religious test and how they establish separation of church and state and that and the thomas jefferson referred to this that was meant clause in the 1st amendment as a wall of separation between religion and government or as we commonly call it again the separation of church and state. but christian nationalists seem to want to undermine this, which wouldn't be so weird if they weren't also brandish in the constitution. constitutional rhetoric about freedom and democracy in liberty. yeah. how do they reconcile this? maybe math even be after all, i think probably the question isn't, you know, how are they doing it? the crushes are doing it and they don't really care about that history. thomas jefferson, what is it? this is disingenuous though it is, disingenuous. it's absolutely disingenuous because as many people are undecidable, there's lots of tomes that have been written about history from a very strange perspective i. e, david barton,

who writes these histories that are not real histories about america and american religion, right. and so when java's jefferson is writing to the church of danbury, connecticut and saying, you know, there should be this while there's no, we're not doing this right. they don't care that thomas jefferson had a koran. they don't care that the koran is sitting right down the street and d. c at the smithsonian. what they care about is that god made this a special nation. and so when you talk about this nation being special, those documents, you can read them how you want to read them because you don't read the same history that kristin is teaching in her history class. or i'm teaching in american religion class. they're not reading that stuff. they are reading these kinds of made up. tomes. this is, this is an nostalgia movement. and we have to think about christian nationalism as nostalgia nostalgia for time. that never existed. nostalgia for a time that didn't exist at the beginning of this nation. why did people come here?

they came here to escape. you know, ty, radical religion. it england. they wanted to have religious freedom to do what they wanted to do. they were religious people. and now we see this being used as no, no, no, we need to have a state religion just like england. this is crazy, right? because you're doing exactly the thing that our founders and framers were with battle for. and so i think what we have to really understand about people who are embracing christian nationalism right now is that they may not get all the nuances around this table, right? they just hear this as another phrase in a whole line of phrases like make america great. again, american exceptionalism. the greatness of america that have been spewed out from different kinds of people throughout our history. christian, someone argue that christian nationalism is gaining political clout, a number of politicians like marjorie taylor green. lauren bober and republican pennsylvania goodman tauriel candidate,

doug master nano. have all been increasingly in the spotlight while towing the christian nationalism line. is christian nationalism influence on the rise, or is it a matter of these voices being louder and taking up more space in the political discourse? it's both, it's both. and that's something that we've seen really just in the last few months . initially when scholars a social scientist and so we're surfacing this and saying this is christian nationalism and and it's authoritarian and anti democratic and it's all of these other things we saw inside christian spaces among those who are promoting christian nationalism deny that even existed and say that you're just mirroring us for being patriot. and then within just weeks we saw the rhetoric shift and we saw people like marjorie taylor green, come out and say yes, i'm a christian nationalist nationalist lauren bober and proud of it and. and not just that, but all christians ought to be christian nationalists. and then all christians are christian nationalists, amanda, we have seen the overturning of roll the way to landmarks federal ruling,

the guarantee the right to abortion, a wave of anti trans legislation government funding earmarked for religious education. all of it's kind of part of an alarming shift in policy and judiciary rulings tied to the far right going forward. how is christian nationalism going to affect the fundamental and really the basis of civil rights for people in the united states? i think christian nationalism strikes at the very heart of civil rights for all americans. i've said that christian nationalism is the single biggest threat today for religious freedom for all. because a cut against that core foundational idea that are belonging in american diety should never depend on how we worship, or how we identify religiously and christian nationalism tries to blow all of that up. and so one part of christian nationalism, of course, is this idea that the united states should be declared a christian nation. very alarmingly, there was a new poll out that

a majority of republicans believe that the united states should be declared a christian nation, even though a majority of republicans also know that that's and constitutional so, so they understand. that's why i don't believe that that christ, those who most a spouse, christian nationalism really believe in the 1st amendment, they don't, they believe in a system of government that would privilege christianity. and then unfortunately, it's a fascinating given how mellow dramatically they have talked about. yes, going into the middle east, how they need to tear down islamic government slamming states, i think denounces alarming nationalism and religious test. some other sorts of in there really thing we don't have a problem with states and religion. we just want our state now. religion. i think you got it. i think that's exactly right. that the hypocrisy of condemning religious nationalism on the world stage while trying to embrace it at home. but

that's exactly what's happening. and i think in a post ro world, we will see attempts at religious laws being passed in the state legislatures. and at the same time, the u. s. supreme court in the last term, not only with the dogs decision, but also with really landmarks, decisions trying to destroy the wall between a separation between church and state, have under cut the legal protections and that, that could become a reality. i think this is incredibly concerning both for civil rights of all americans. and especially for those in our public schools. i'm really concerned about christian nationalism and civil rights of our youngest neighbors. those in the public schools and. and for instance, if we might see more state sponsored religious exercise in the public schools as well as of course, the attack on history being taught in the public schools, they would much rather teach the mythology if a christian nation than a candid history of the united states, we could,

we could literally and other schools with dinosaurs or out of the curriculum, been and we're going back to creation that creation stories. well, i mean, i can't believe we're having this conversation, but we no longer have the legal protections or the support of the, of the united states supreme court. and helping us spend off attacks like this. and so it's going to be up to those of us who are, who are concerned about christian nationalism who don't want to see this is a religious state of who care about religious freedom for all people to stand up and huge, those foundational ideals. but what i think the 3 of you for an amazing conversation, right, that is our show up front will be back. next week the from talk to al jazeera, we also do believe that women of afghanistan was somehow abandoned by the international community. we listen, we have a huge price for the rural,

i'm gonna terrorism us going on for money. we meet with global news maintenance. i'm talk about the stories that matter on al jazeera. i can look my phone with my face. you can access your bank account with your voice unique algorithmic measurements of us that are revolutionizing the process of identification. the biometrics, a fall from 1st and they convenience and seeming infallibility. comes at a price. most crucially, our prime, in the 4th of a 5 part series id, re addresses the appropriation of our most personal characteristics. all hail the algorithm on jesse beneath the waters off the guy and east coast lies a newly discovered bounty of oil. enough to transform a country with the poverty rate near 40 percent, according to the world bank to an oil rich republic. now the nations new found oil . well, this funding in energy project is electrifying the rural landscape. well,

guyana is just beginning to export oil to the world president, your fun only wants to replace carbon based fuels at home with renewable energy, with the goal of cutting the cost of power in hand. the nation's energy planners are harnessing the rain forest rivers to power hydro plants like this one near kato, even in the capital of georgetown were going on. as oil boom is being felt, the most solar power is transforming the landscape and the power grid event boom, can continue. experts say the fossil fuel bounty of the guy and east coast has the potential to provide clean energy to the countries remotest regions and lift the fortunes of the next generation blue. this is al jazeera ah.