tv The Stream Al Jazeera February 28, 2023 7:30am-8:00am AST
7:30 am
or the transformations and will, behind the scenes. here i'm troubleshooting in a virtual semi conduct a factory. it could be the digital twin of a physical factory. this is the industrial met, verse where real machines, factories, buildings, cities and transport networks. a merit in the virtual world, because in the digital environment, problems can be found and fixed quickly, increasing productivity and reducing costs. as companies take their 1st baby steps into the met averse people like susie mercer are there to guide them. we're still at the very early days at the moment, required some very much experimenting in the space. thought we all very clear what the impact is going to happen. my business. they were experimenting, but we're experimenting on the some of the potential impact baseline. and then we'll scale, where is the benefit there where it's beneficial, whether benefits field, my zation will scale. some of the grades will scale some ways. so well, it's tree value is not yet clear. it is clear the met of us is here to stay.
7:31 am
charlie angela al jazeera barcelona. ah, this is al jazeera, these are the top stories and is really americans being shot dead on the highway near the city of jericho and the occupied west bank. the shooting comes as israel deploys hundreds of additional soldiers after an escalation and violence on sunday . so hot out has more fully occupied westmark in just a few weeks ago. again, it was under locked down after they arrest fine, arrested 5 palestinians, they said were part of an armed group that is attacking a settlers. now we've seen a few of those attacks in the last couple of months. the, during the, at a time that these writing you government has come in to several israelis have been killed. but also the number of palestinians that have been killed in occupied with might just this year alone has gone up to 65 and things are incredibly intense. especially after what happens on sunday opposition parties in nigeria have walked
7:32 am
out of the accounting process for the presidential election ballot are still being tawny than what's become the tightest race in decades. egypt foreign ministers arrived and took here to assess the damage caused by 2 major earthquakes earlier this month. so michelle cream met the turkish foreign minister in the southern city of marson and a magnitude 5 point. 6 earthquake is shaken. the city of mulatto in eastern turkey on monday, one person's dead and more buildings have been destroyed, malachi was among the areas affected by the quakes on february. the 6th the by the administration says it still can't say definitively how the corona virus pandemic began. earlier u. s. media reports said the energy department concluded that the outbreak was likely to be the result of a leak from a chinese laboratory. those are the headlines. the news is going to continue here
7:33 am
on al jazeera after the stream. good bye for now on counting the calls to one year off the roster invaded ukraine off sanctions against moscow worth it. because as far as senegal feel the pitch of the fighting ukraine, holiday coping plus aaron via a seal. the biggest aviation deal in the industry, history. count the call on al jazeera, with somebody who is easily influenced by this app. it tick tock has made you stand thousands of dollars and by a bunch of stuff that you don't lead this video is for you. i'm loving this deep blunting time because truly showing us how much consumers abbas taken over our brains and game of the things that we buy that we just simply do not meet for. this is my favorite trend of all time. i can't believe we as a collective are finally admitting that overconsumption as getting out of control. i fall into the same chad where like i need of the next new products are needed to
7:34 am
fall. the next you trying to feel like the most beautiful, with my makeup product, extra with my next glam that i do, the i'd say needed to have the it products to be relevant. and that's just ridiculous. i just today take talk to and consumer culture. you've heard of influencers, but what about a di influencer? i managed to have a dean and on this episode of the stream, we'll look at the tick tock trend, and what it's saying about our online shopping habits and our shifting attitudes towards influencers. as always, you can be part of this conversation. just put your questions and comments into our lives you to jap. the me with us to talk about this in london, joe barber, author of the book, consumed the need for collective change, colonialism, climate change, and consumerism. in the u. s. state of arkansas, jessica clifton and online content creator who focuses on sustainability and in new york, elisa,
7:35 am
lakes and author branding expert and the founder of leave your mark. welcome to you all i want to start with you. i mean, what is the influencing and what do you attribute to this new trend? well, the 1st thing i'll start with is i hope that it's not a trend. the reality is we had been buying too much for far too long, and the planet can no longer sustain us in this way of buying. and so if this is a trend, it's probably not something that should be a trend. but ultimately, what i'm seeing is a lot of people talking about consumption, which is awesome. that's exactly where we need to be. however, i've seen some people sort of say, don't buy this by this and said when actually we should be asking ourselves why we're buying. so much stuff to begin with. yeah, i appreciate that framing. i mean i was a bit confused because it seems like they're still kind of influencing, but they're just pivoting and i don't know like reverse psychology. we'll get into that in a bit. but creston, jessica, your thought is this
7:36 am
a trend and what's driving it certainly feels like agend right now and definitely as a trend with ours, i would love for the conversation to continue further. i 1st i was so excited to see this trend. obviously st. about the content creators, he's been trying to create a way that they're on other controlled him for years. it started with a lot of normal people. i mean, awareness about their own over consumption. people making videos about like i didn't realize i had to wash it. i didn't realize but continued to buy new hair, dresses, but i think it's a beautiful realization, the realization i had for years to go back and change my mindset consumption forever. but yeah, i just like to just mention it quickly turned in to buy that not by bashing brands and buying just different, cheaper dupes, which is going back into the older consumption hampshire. well, that we've been over consumption hamster, we'll leave that. does that ring true to you? i mean, do you feel like this trend is actually separate from influencing in general?
7:37 am
the great question and you know, to be honest, i agree with both of you on, on why it's a great thing, but here's where it went awry. when it start illegitimate thing, the creator economy, right? because, i mean, just, you said it best in one of your videos. there is amazing content creators on tick tock, for example. and the idea that de influencing and i think it's like, you know, the hash tag over consumption would have been a better thing to go viral than be influencing. because i do think what's happening is legitimate creator, who are authentic, who care about what they talk about, who care about who they align with, are kind of being roped into this. and then we start to see mainstream headlines that are like or influences over is influenced or marketing debt. and the reality is we live in a world where brands are going to constantly try to sell you something. the only
7:38 am
difference here is the tick tock algorithm, where you pay that it's feeding you constantly, things that they think you want to see. right? and you know, whether it is a trend isn't a trend. we have a lot of people on take talk, commenting about this. all one of whom mail says that this di, influencing trend is actually a trend that's just gone off the rails. take a look not to be shady, but it seems like a lot of you don't actually know would be influencing is telling people you don't like a product only to recommend they buy a different product is still influencing the entire ethos of the influencing is to get people to consume less, not by other different things. and since around the topic this trying to quickly down into in girl territory using it as an excuse to bully and shooting people for the way that they spend their money. like it shouldn't need to be said that if somebody buys a product that you don't like or consider, be too expensive, it is not a reflection of their level of intelligence or character who's actively trying to consume less. i like the idea of this trend, but it is going off the rails very quickly. so what do you think of that? i mean, more people certainly seem to be thinking about their over consumption habits.
7:39 am
we've seen those all videos featuring sort of fast fashion and beauty products, but what do you make about that video, comment and what your ethical concerns with all of this. i mean what's, what's this really about? my ethical concerns are the fact that we are in a climate crisis and a few years. well actually know right now places in the world are already seeing water shortages. we're seeing resource shortages when i know that the fashion industry accounts for so much waste and so much over consumption, we're talking millions of products getting incinerated. i know that ultimately this can't be a trend. and, you know, if we're talking about judging people for how they spend their money, no, we shouldn't be doing that, but we should be asking ourselves why we're spend their money in the way we're doing it. when we talk about water crisis, water crisis and different parts of the world, but you need to understand as things like cotton, which is used for that t shirt. that accounts for
7:40 am
a lot of water to grow that continent to produce and harvest those goods. and so if we already have people that are facing water shortages and we have a. busy world where, where sort of being pushed to by, you know, a pair of jeans, a year, 20 cotton t shirts which we ultimately aren't going to wear and they might end up in the landfill. then what are we doing besides creating more strife and strain for our fellow humans who we share this planet with? most certainly, certainly important question. i don't know if i have an answer. maybe you do a lot of people in youtube also commenting. we have, for example, cherry very thing. consumerism is out of hand and there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. it should just be about consuming less and more ethically, not as in brands, but as in the way we are consuming. so obviously a lot of people reflecting on their habits as we've said, but i mean, if i'm not mistaken, the influencing at the end of the day still very much seems like people are trying
7:41 am
to, in who, in people's behavior online, in terms of how they spend their money, so we've, we've kind of mentioned this point, but i want to share with you an articulate professor who, who share that with a jonathan sent us this video about the changing identity for influences and why it's all a bit confusing. take listen to what we're seeing. influence has become d influences, but it's a bit of a paradox, really, because you've got influences who are looking to monetize their social presence. and if we look at the rise of the influence, so that was because content traces through the democratization of information quite rightly challenged are the sizes and journalists about their opinions. but now we see that the tables of turned and influences have been challenged about being potentially to money hungry. so i think in reality, what we're going to say is a balancing act we're influences are going to be influences and the influences at the same time. and to me, it's a bit like the old psychology trick, where if you tell somebody not to do something, it actually increases that curiosity and desire. so these are what do you make of
7:42 am
jonathan's comments there? i know that you've recently published this article, a headline really gives it away here. it says d. influencing is a scam actually, and we've seen this trend before. so what do you make of that? so 1st of all, i think jonathan was very well spoken in his answer, but the problem is that it is true if you even have a 100 followers and you are telling them not to do something. and they respect your opinion because you're coming from an authentic place, you have influenced them. so i think the issue we're having here is not so much the message as much as it is the hash tag in a way that has gone viral. because i mean, when we think back to any previous economic downturn, take it 2008. right. 2009 was the year that bloggers really came to the forefront. certainly in fashion. and even though they existed prior to that,
7:43 am
that was when all of a sudden everyone was like, wow, here the people they're giving their real opinions. yeah. because they had no skin in the game. they were not, they were not hearing to advertise her dollars. they really could be authentic. so i think it's 2 fault. i think there is the need to stop over consumption. but there's also the need for authentic voices. and there is a lot that's happening online right now, where people are taking, you know, as much money as they can. and you know, you can't blame the mean me at the end of the day. i think the other issue is this is a business being a full time content creator is a legitimate, fair enough. so can you said you can blame them? go ahead. yeah, go ahead. i was going to come, can we blame them? what is one of the things that i want to get back to is the fact that i know a lot of people who have been, you know, ethical content creators for a long time. and the reality is, we set out a lot of money for our morals, and i am one of those people. if i were to go around saying that everything that's
7:44 am
thrown my way is sustainable, i would be a multimillionaire, right? but i've already evaluated what i want for myself on this planet, and i actually don't want that because i don't think that that's really helping the problem. so there are people that are legitimately in this conversation and has been into it for a long time. and we aren't making all the money, but we are in it for the right reasons. and i like the idea that, you know, i can influence someone by basically wearing my clothing a lot. and by saying no to bad brands that i know do not care about the planet. and yes, that means that i'm not making all the money. but i think when you reevaluate the planet that we're living on and the systems that we're living under, some people might find that maybe that's not actually the path for you. so it really depends on the person and ultimately what they want out of their platform. and for me, as someone who has sat out hundreds and thousands of dollars because i will not be the face, the green washing, i can say that you have to evaluate who the person is what their platform is and
7:45 am
why they're and i'm not selling a lot of things on my platform because of that i'm missing out on huge paycheck. but you know what? that is not where my joy comes from. i don't want all the clothes. i don't want fancy cards. i don't want, you know, a lot of the things that we've been told were supposed to want, and that's a cultural shift that i'm also seeing that i think it's important. right. and i think when you think cultural shift, that's so important that we frame it as such because at the end of the day it's really about a much broader trend outside of take talk consumerism, capitalism, in general, lot of people and you to commenting on that before i come back to you, i want to ask you quickly, i mean, what do you think about the idea that sustainable goods and practices are privileged that not everyone can afford? i think people that i have grown up with and known within my friendship circle than my own family, are often more sustainable than the people that go out and buy the all the sustainable this and that because that's what you're supposed to have. so i think
7:46 am
that that conversation has kind of been used to, to continue our consumerism within our society. because the truth of the matter is sitting back and say, you know why, i'm not going to buy x amount in new clothes this year. i'm just going to get new genes. that is something that a lot of us can do, right? flowing down, it costs you nothing. and a lot of people are already doing that. it's just not fancy and social media packaged. how about you? yeah. how are you? i just want to, i just want to kind of acura what you were saying. i think i think what you're talking about about sitting out on those opportunities goes back to your belief system, right. and in my upcoming book on brand, one of which is all about building your personal brand, one of the 1st exercises is, what is your belief system? what do you want to align with? and i think a lot of people do a good job making sure that they have a clear belief system for their own personal brand dna. and they stick to it. and then there are others who are out for the take. and i completely agree with you.
7:47 am
you can miss out on a lot of financial opportunity, but at the end of the day have to sleep at night. that's true that people are fine with. i was calling to let track close. i was, i'm not, you're right, you're right. i mean, i was just gonna say a lot of people i think might be motivated by profit rather than purpose. so maybe the reflecting more on how they and the, you know, in this culture where we're all comparing ourselves to the next person on the next platform. i mean, i think that can influence our own belief system, but less about my thoughts more about yours. i wanna share it with you. cherry very thing. thank you for reading my comment. my question for the panel panel is what is something we can all do to be less consumer as and help the planet? jessica, what comes to mind when you hear these sort of concerns either from cherry ferry here or just from people who follow you online? what do you say kind of what i was just talking about when it comes to buying sustainable good. the back of the matter is green. capitalism is not going to fall
7:48 am
. climate change is not going to help over consumption. so what is so great is a way to help our consumption behavior is literally to change your mindset. oh, once that around consumption, it's all about asking questions before you buy, kind of creating a pause before you purchase something just to see is this and purchase? does this brand treat the plan and the workers correctly just starting to ask those questions is a great way to learn how to consume more consciously? it's not about buying new things. it's about shipping, not mine, buying less. and, you know, anecdotally in the last few years, i've seen tick tock, kind of kind of consuming so many people's attention and bandwidth. it's really, you know, taken off. we've also seen companies like she and, and others just really bring the price point down to a point that's really staggering to believe. i mean, it's hard if you look on their website, but this is forget sustainable, but forget even ethical but possible. and so with that in mind, i do want to know,
7:49 am
like, i guess when you see a hall video where people are in boxing tons of clothes from she in or somewhere else. i mean, what is your initial reaction to that knowing that there are millions of people potentially doing that on tick tock. for example, nacia, i feel nauseous when i make me feel sick. and what is, i mean? i think it's interesting. it makes you feel thick, but it's also making our planet sick. i mean, i asked you earlier, what are the costs, and one of your answers to our producers and the pre interviews that i found really interesting is you were kind of pinpointing a good solution for consumers is to think about who is benefiting. right. like, are you benefiting? is it just the influence or could you talk us through some of that and what the real cost is for the planet? yes. so 60 percent of fibers that exist and retail spaces today are polyester. what that means is they are plastic. a lot of people do not connect the plastic problem
7:50 am
to our clothing, but a lot of the closing that's being made is not being made from natural fibers. so what does that mean? it means it's never going to bio degrade that dress that you bought to where one time for a weekend, it's going to be on the planet for longer than you well. and what we also know is with microfiber stake, go everywhere, including in our water stream, fish eat them, you know, so when we are eating and drinking water, as long as we are continuing to watch these fibers that shed, they will get into our food supply. so at the end of the day, i think there's this idea that fast fashion is hard, blessed and we know that other people and we know that it's harming the planet. but eventually that's gonna come around and harm you to. you might think you're just having fun, but like nobody wants to drink plastic. and by the way, a lot of the colder fake. so let's talk about that too. a lot of people are buying in bulk from different brands to create content. so it's not even, or they have,
7:51 am
they're actually buying the product, they're doing it to have content creation, right? and that's what it's concerning to me like when we talk about this as a trend. i mean, all of this is concerning to me and it should be to all of us. but i'm, for example, terry ferry. now, part of this conversation i love and that happens in you to chime in thing. the problem with saying by more ethical brands is most of them are expensive and poor people like me can't afford them, but we can do thrift shopping and stuff. so that issue of the price point. jessica, what comes to mind for you? i mean, what's the solution social media really does tend to make people feel like they're poor or they're missing out. yeah. so to me, it's not people who are living with and there means that are causing the math over consumption. it is the people who are making these $501000.00 halls of she and on pick talk. when people love to talk about this, there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. it is a really great point,
7:52 am
but when people are talking about, you know, shopping more consciously and we're talking about the, the more sustainable products in general. when this comes up, it's never for the people who are living in there is the people where yeah, if you can spend $500.00 on a 5 fashion company, you can probably consume less and put that money toward brands who are actually treating their workers barely can i say i clarify when i say it again, i was up when i i felt buying fast fashion when i was broke. basically i realize that all of my disposable income was going into the direction of clothing that i didn't even need. or really, why like that? well, your income was going to disposable clothing arguably. exactly. and so there became a time period where i was really not financially in a great place. and i was like something's got to give. and i ended up wearing the clothing in my closet and it turned out i had a lot of clothing and i began to realize that i never wanted to go back to that way
7:53 am
again. and it's such a better way of living. i don't have the same sort of impulsive purchases, which i think that's what a lot of fashion runs on, is impulsive buying. and so when you have that mindset shift, you aren't going to get, as, you know, pushed into buying something really quickly because you're actually researching and taking the time and saving for things. i think sometimes in our society we have this idea that if you have to say for something that means that it's unfair and affordable, but that's just not the way our grandparents shop is, not the way we're supposed to be buying clothing. it shouldn't be that a costs the same as a lot, so it just isn't. no, we can't have a world where repaid people fairly if that's what we're looking for. but additionally, the person that has to pick between paying their light bill or buying a pair of trousers from an unethical maker is never going to be the person doing the whole video. yeah, so we have to be realistic about who is doing the damage here and i think for
7:54 am
a long time this conversation has been very dishonest. yeah. dishonest, i think a lack of transparency and accountability which i'm so grateful that we're bringing to it today. obviously, it's safe to say that influencing for better or worse is not going anywhere with that in mind. what are some of the takeaways? well, we have actually a d, t mayor who is a sustainable fashion blogger, who actually shares with, with us what she thinks of the whole, the influencing trend, why it matters and where it may be. going to go with the fact that we have this name of the influencing and the fact that it has permeated to the internet at large is so important for the cultural zeitgeist. we need more conversations about how influence or culture is predicated on this really false idea. of aspiration, that is all about mindless consumption or single use outfits and that needs to change. um, but what concerns me is the fact that the influencing is being called
7:55 am
a trend. i hope that the influencing is not a fleeting moment on the internet. and i hope that it becomes an opportunity for us to kind of think more critically about these fast pace consumption lace platforms like tick tock. so these are what should people keep in mind? or if they want to keep buying things, i mean, any advice here? well, 1st of all, i would say that if anyone is truly against what, what they believe is tick, tock ball, then they should probably get off the platform. number one, like you don't, no one has to be there and you control who you follow. you certainly can feed your for you page to give you about what you want to see. the 2nd thing is that i don't think that we should be shaming content creators who are promoting brands. it's their livelihood. so i think we have to separate what is an actual job not saying they should be doing whole through she and i don't think anyone should shop a chan,
7:56 am
but this is advertising. this is our new form of advertising since the influence or economy so. so i leave that because we're running out of time, i just want to pepper and a comment that just came in on this issue. charles caplin saying on youtube to us, thanks to the celebrities for allowing themselves to be the poster people for fast fashion different clothes, every frequent event. yeah. hollywood so. okay. where do any? yeah. is that sample. ok i that is where i come from. i used to dress every celebrity for the red carpet. those are actually that is the most sustainable practice. those are borrowed samples. they're not even showing different things. constantly. people don't know that, right? so like there is power and the celebrity who re, where's the thing, whether it's borrowed or not, or we don't in the culture. ok, we all have to do about models and i think the luxury going up and different outfits every single time you see them. does promote that,
7:57 am
we need to be wearing different things all the time. so whether it's samples or not, they're still promoting the over consumption because the normal consumer doesn't know that these are samples. they are just high dollar items that they're wearing on the red carpet that they never wear again. but think about how it affects all the other industries ray. if we're a different garment which you know, many celebrities change during the day and get the attention of hopper asi, you have many different photos and different outfits, which means media sites are gonna pick up all different versions of you in different app. and so everything it's feeding each other, it is an ecosystem of media, is what we're talking fair enough. i mean, certainly an ecosystem that has a lot of flaws, but also thanks to this conversation, banks to your expertise. hopefully we can move in a direction that's more sustainable for everybody. i for what it's worth, it's given me a lot to think about. so i want to thank you. ok, just jessica elisa, i mean maybe i'm winning in some way because i think i've worn this blazer on every single show this month. so definitely not living up to the celebrity,
7:58 am
celebrity culture, but that's all the time we have for today. thanks everyone for your comments. particularly you terry sherry, i don't know if that's your name, but always love when you guys get into this conversation. see you next time. ah ah a, it's a $1000000000.00 money. no drink operation to coal. marsha is bigger than the company with financial institutions, regulators and governments complicit. i'm always offering with right. i've
7:59 am
described that in a full part series. al jazeera investigative unit goes on to cover in southern africa, pittsburgh. we can fill it, 90 percent. it doesn't. once it's pretty falling, it's perfectly brandon. good. part one on al jazeera, a passion for supporting local communities, and pioneering innovative african science and technology projects. how, how beautiful, how glorious are all of us on this planet? not just africa, al jazeera, for as a leading biochemist, determined to use his scientific knowledge to serve africa. women make science from the lab to the field on now to sierra 2002 was the 5th hottest year on global records stretching back more than a century. government report says 2022 was a bad year for whether 2023 isn't shaping up to be much better already here in
8:00 am
california series of severe storms has battered the coast line and the interior of the state, pausing a number of deaths and up to a $1000000000.00 in damages. climate scientists say the warming is caused by industrial age, heat trapping, gas emissions, which have been rising steeply since the 1960. they say rapid reductions and emissions are needed across the globe to slow or reverse the greenhouse effect. ah and is there any american is shot dead in the occupied west bite? d u. s. state department says it's concerned about the escalation in violence. ah, i'm wrong about this and this is all 0 live from doha. also coming up. you can you leaders reaching.
19 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1762623381)