boots the field in a very icing metric position for the opposition of parties. perhaps that explains why paraguayan so hoping for a better future while again voting for the party of the past. due ca, newman, al jazeera, as soon ceiling parrot lie. troubled 1st republic bank is being acquired by j. p. morgan chase bank us regulators had taken control of the bank and they were rushing to find a buyer to prevent it from collapsing. first republic shares fell last week after it revealed that customers had withdrawn a $100000000000.00 in deposits and march. that was the same month that silicon valley bank and signature bank collapse was in fears of a wider market fallout. ah, this is al jazeera, these are the top stories. sporadic gunfire is being held across. sedans, capitol, hot tomb. as despite an extension of

a faltering cease fire for another 70 to 2 hours on humanitarian grounds. and continued fighting, making it difficult for thousands of people trying to leave sudan, many a, making a treacherous journey to port sedan on the north eastern coast. to board evacuation ships him, morgan reports from houghton. it looks like the debris f. b, as an organization has looked into the needs of the sudanese people, are, are the, are people fleeing from the capital hotel into neighboring states and into neighboring countries who are in need of assistance. now many people say that they're out of food, and this is of course, looking after the conflict that happened here in the capital. a harder to them prior to that, at least 15000000 people, that's a 3rd of the population of sedan were in need of humanitarian assistance and doubly of be had to held its operations during the 1st day of the conflict at because 3 of its staff were killed tens of thousands of people are rallying in south korea's capital to market international workers. day trade unions are demanding

a raise to the minimum wage there also against plans to increase the number of working hours rallies are also taking place in multiple cities across indonesia. the jakarta, thousands of people of march towards the presidential palace. they wanted the repeal of a new job creation law which was passed in march and was meant to attract more fallen investment. couldn't say of benefits, big companies rather than workers and the environment. you are secretary of state antony blinkin is said to have meetings with the foreign ministers of armenia and azerbaijan, the talk same to reduce tensions about than a goal. carbonic disputes as are by jones set up checkpoints in the region along the lashing corridor. last month is the only road connecting armenia with the area backers dismissed calls to remove the checkpoints, which according to armenia, violate a 20 twenty's ceasefire agreement between the 2 countries. but a guys conservative ruling parties, candidate has won the presidential election. santiago, opinion, colorado party has been in power for most of the last 75 years. then his center

left royal f and a leg got just under 27.5 percent. despite having a narrow lead in opinion polls. and those of the headline stay tuned up front is up next. i roberson stay with us. talk to al jazeera, we ask who is really fighting this russia? is it wagner or is it the russian military? we listen, we started talking to mom, mom, so that this via your citizen ish look to get him back. we meet with global news makers and talk about the stories that matter on al jazeera, the u. s. military is facing its greatest recruitment crisis in 50 years. military leaders say they are struggling to hit their enlistment targets because most potential recruits simply do not meet the military's eligibility standards. while data shows that over half of young people simply do not see a future in the armed forces. many attribute this to information about the

military's internal culture being more readily available in this day and age, including reports of racism and sexual harassment and fears of lack of adequate care and support for veterans. others argue that the decline in recruitment has more to do with how young people view the military and a shift and personal beliefs when it comes to war. so what is behind this decline? and are we witnessing a change in americans relationship to the military? that's our conversation this week, and it up front special. ah, joining us is minissha real, some veteran of the u. s. army and member of truth in recruitment, a non profit group, educating young people on the consequences of a military career. richard broke shire as a u. s. army veteran and co founder of the black veterans project and caitlin constantine is the u. s. marine corps veteran and founding member of gamers for peace. a group dedicated to speaking truth to war in digital spaces,

in order to counter military recruitment. i want to thank you all for joining me on up front, caitlin, i'm going to start with you. 2022 was the worst year for military recruitment since the us draft ended in 1973 with the army in particular, struggling to meet its goals. military officials have pointed to the fact just 23 percent of young people ages 17 to 2324, excuse me. meet the military's health and fitness and academic standards. you counsel young people about recruitment. what would you say are the main factors that keep prospective recruits from joining? i think they're correct and that a lot of the immigration would not qualify for military service in the 1st place. additionally, i do think that kenzie the generation after us. i do think that they are much more skeptical of military service. there is a study from the military family advisory network that saw an 11 percent decrease in service members who would recommend military service to their families as of at

the, i believe 2022. so there is a shift in a, in their perception of military service in addition to a lot of systemic problems like lack of education and lack of access to a, to decent food and poverty that is making a lot of the population not very suitable for military service when he said there was a survey in 2019 up by the center for american progress. and in this study found out that a majority of jin z, respondents ages $17.00 to $24.00, agreed that quote. the wars in the middle east in afghanistan were a waste of time lives and tax payer money, and they did nothing to make us safer at home. that's a quote. do you see an ideological shift in how young people are perceiving the u. s. military, and if so, what are the ways it, it's changed? absolutely, and i think if we start with how the u. s. was created to begin with,

we know that the u. s. was born out of exploitation slavery, the theft of land, and the u. s. military was born out of that same character. and so our generations now have had way more access to information and have been challenged in ways that have grown them up. unlike previous generations where those generations were taught not to question a, the us government and not to question why we're going to war, but that it your duties ago. and if you're a good citizen, then you'll go. but now our, our use are, are not being fooled. by these narratives and climate change, i think has a lot to do with that. and you have access to information on the front lines of resistance, sort of violence against the land. like you have standing rock, you have missing a murdered indigenous women. you have the hypocrisies and contradictions of the u. s. right in our faces. and we're able to talk about it now in ways that we weren't

able to talk about it before, especially after the trump era. and so with the u. s being the largest polluter in the world, the largest holder of real estate in the world with more than 4800 defense sites, everywhere on all continents. in more than 160 countries. i think jen z, it's really connected with what the impacts of that are and, and as you said in that, in that quote, i mean, absolutely, it was a complete waste of life for all parties concerned to go to war and for what, today with the internet young people have all kinds of access to the realities of war, the violence, the bodies, the harm, the soldiers suffer in also the harm that soldiers cause. do you think that those things are not only changing people's perception of war, which i think is we could agree on, but isn't making people less likely to want to enlist kaitlin?

would you agree with that? i would agree with that. i think that with the rise of the digital age and greater access to all of this information we, we, we have a box that literally contains almost all of the information in the world in our pocket. most of the time and gen z grew up with that. i really do think that having that access and having at ready you can just google us military war crime and have a list right in front of you within seconds. so i do think that that is having a very real effect on people's desire to unless it's, it's definitely being viewed as more of a rigid decision or a rigid decision making process rather than oh, my dad did this. so i can do this type of a deal. i wanna insert that. what, what's often missing from this conversation is that military services, intergenerational, they're, they're usually through things that indicate very well whether someone will join the military. it's whether they come from a military family. they grew up near military base and in socioeconomic status. right. and i think we're what, what's,

what's happening is that you have general generations of veterans that have gone through unjust wars. you also have generations of veterans who have been fighting to get access because they have to live in deplorable conditions outside of just war. right. you have, you have bases that are rife with, with mold i, i, when i was a combat medic, i worked in an 8 station on a base in germany, been condemned by the german government and that was our medical center. oh, so you know, i think that that like the extent to which these problems exacerbate themselves when you, when you get out and you don't, you can't get access to basic health care or disability compensation. and it is affecting the generations that are growing up, watching their fathers or their grandfathers or grandmothers. they're on their sisters not struggle with access. we just had our country past the biggest veterans bill in history to try to, to try to address that issue because that is the real issue is that people have been locked out and sometimes it, depending on the color skin generationally, from benefits. right. and so the appeal on that the military has the that the,

the lie that they can sometimes propagate, that you'll be better off if you, sir, like the veneer of that is so diluted now. and mary, that with the information that you can so readily find online, it's no surprise that young people can kind of see right through. it is well documented that military recruiters target young people from low income neighborhoods. over 80 percent of people who enlist, come from households with lower incomes, recruits are offered attractive signing bonuses, offers to pay for education and recruitment materials. emphasize the career opportunities of joining the military. keeping in mind that you as poverty is steadily growing in terms of the poverty rate over the last few years. has this actually become a full fledged poverty direct? yeah, i believe so. and listen to that. that does not negate that if you are able to go into the military, have a full career actually gain access to your benefits that you can't be better off.

but so many folks is specifically marginalized. people from marginalized communities are the ones left holding the bag of falling through the cracks, struggling to obtain access and, and malware kind of focuses as explicitly on the black community. and if the effects there. well, i mean, that's a great point because black folk are over represented in the military, we make up over 17 percent of active duty members. for now, for con, next week we make a wells and a half to 13 percent of the u. s. population depending on the year. so, you know, there's a 2019 survey of active duty service members that found that more than half of minority service member say they have personally witnessed examples of white nationalism of ideological driven racism within the rank. one of the other, given the high number of reports of racism, why we still join is so heavy because there's a, there's a illusion of lack of oper. no, not, not just an illusion. it or it's actually a lack of are absolutely in a lot of these neighborhoods that,

that black youth are being pulled from. and that's been the case for decades now. and then yes, what you get out of the military, even if you served 20 years, are likely returning to those poor resource, poor neighborhoods where your family reside. right. so, oh yeah, no that, that absolutely has. when i want to pivot for for minute, the department of defense estimates that in 2021 close 236000 active duty service members experienced unwanted sexual contact. more than half of them women a 3rd who reported and want to stress that were discharged within one year. the military has claimed that they're making significant reforms, or they want to address the culture that enables sexual violence in the military. but those same 2021 department of defense statistics show some of the highest estimates for unwanted sexual contact since they started keeping records back in 2004. i guess my question is simply,

is that what is the military doing to really prove it? sexual violence, they're not really trying to prevent that rape as a weapon or it's sanctioned. it's accepted. say more about that. explain what you me when you say that. so i said it ally, and i always get a, an angry response. but it's true if we actually take the time to listen to the populations that we are in meaning and with our words of conquests in wars of choice. and when we actually take a look at their dana, that they're presenting about the sex crimes that occur from military personnel on to their communities on to their children until they're young. when in then you can actually see the whole picture. and when you look at historically, the lack of adjudication that's occurred inside the military with military sexual violence because of the good character defense. because of all the reasons why maintaining good order and discipline all the excuses that leadership maintains,

in order to perpetuate the use and acceptance of this weapon of war. then it makes sense to anyone. ah, well, to me that we share perpetrators. how am i going to believe as a person who went through this myself, who witnessed it constantly, every duty station that i was at i was wearing the teams uniform. it happened to me. so of course, it's gonna happen where, where people are stationed, where we're occupying, where we're taught to dehumanize those people. so if order and discipline and structure and rules are part of what makes the military the military, then why is it so hard to get justice? when you say something about it wire is intelligible, getting discharges. why are stuck with this number? a 3rd of those who reported were discharged. not a 3rd of the people accused. a 3rd of people who said i got assaulted. i got touched, i got harm done to me. a 3rd of those people are gone within 12 months. how and

because it keeps you quiet because it takes you or moves you, you become the problem. if you're the one who speaks up, if you report, that's why there's retaliation and there's a lot of talking about preventing it about stopping it, about supporting people. if they report, but that doesn't actually happen, caitlin, i see you nodding. i agree with moneisha. i mean one thing is she saying, where is not just within the ranks, it is also where service members are stationed. it doesn't just have to be an act of war. we have bases in what over 80 countries and pick any one of them. you can definitely see that effects. i also experience as while i was active duty in the marine corps wearing the same uniform. and one thing that i noticed all of these briefs about prevention, all of these briefs about what to do if it happens and how to report it. it is framed as how not to get in trouble. it's low. be careful if you have a beer and this other person also has a beer. you need to be careful. it's not i,

it's not based on in respect. it's always, i remember this one very like we're turning point for me. it was during a brief end. it was, i think of bull. i believe a gunnery sergeant was giving the sapir brief, which is a sexual assault, sexual assault prevention and response program. and he asks, why is this such a bad thing? and the 1st person to raise their hand said because it affects unit cohesion. and now i'm not saying that that person is wrong. but that wouldn't be my 1st. it wouldn't be my birthday is that? yeah, exactly. it's a bad thing to do, should be the 1st answer, right. and because it takes away bodily autonomy abuses your power, all of these different things, but it was always framed in how not to get trouble, egg get in trouble and how it affects your unit as opposed to basic respect for human bodily autonomy, right? that's why it doesn't go away when you report. that's why the person who report it goes away. that's why i experienced mild read of, you know, deathly not to the level of some people but mild retaliation because i was the

problem by making waves iraq of the boat. and so they want that to go away because that means they don't have to deal with the core of it, which is so much of this is happening to women in some, i'm curious to know as a man who served in the military. what do you see? do you see that discourse of their talking about the how not, what do you see the harm do you see? we do in cove and it doesn't just affect women. i mean, i think the statistics around actual saw of the around a male sexual assault in the military are, are horrendous as well. and the unit cohesion argument, i'm glad that you brought that up because i served under don't ask themselves as good as a, as a gay soldier. so i understand the harms and, and the excuse that they can make about including inclusion or the dangers of inclusion. because how it might affect unit cohesion, but it's also the same argument that they used against black people. 75 years ago, this year is a 75th anniversary of the desegregation of the military. and they talked about how in world war 2, when they were doing surveys, when they were preparing for after world war 2, up to 940,

to desegregate the vast majority of people, the military were against it because they felt it would disrupt unit cohesion, right? so i think that that, that, that, that's a, that's a common response. it's a disturbing response. kaitlin a, i've been seeing a lot of, um, recruitment efforts in digital entertainment spaces. now a big boom in it. frankly, especially video games. the military's had a hand in the creation of somebody's video games for decades, but now all 6 branches of the u. s. military have electronic sports teams for competitive video gaming and partnerships with popular video game players on platforms like youtube and twitch. you work with gamers for peace as we're going you on this a group that, of course, is dedicated, as you say, to speaking truth, to war in digital spaces, in order to counter military recruitment. can you explain how digital recruitment, with video games works and, and what we should do about it?

so sure, well you already have a gate 1st person shooter games like c o, d 1st person shooter games like america's army, that's literally sanctioned by, by the, by the u. s. army is now been decommission, but it was a long running free to play game. and all of these other games to have military themes, and i'm not telling you not to play these games, is not the point of this, but they do serve a propaganda purpose, just like military movies do it is similar only in video games. you as a player, have a hand in how all of that goes, and a lot of them have pretty simplistic story lines right, where the protagonist a is trying his best to defeat the enemy. what, you know, whatever the particular enemy for that game story light is and is generally in a good versus evil, sorta paradigm. and so when you couple that with these e sports games that are run by, they're not recruiters, but they are recruiters because they're serving a recruiting purpose,

no matter what they say. even though the navy, in order to get that job you, they have to go through the same recruiting, trading that a navy recruiter would have to go through. so you couple that together there you have people being able to form a paras social relationship that you would with any other twitch dreamer while they're playing the very over simplified game if i'd versions of war. and so you have this effect of i simultaneously trivializing war and military service, while also talking to someone who is actively in that military service, talking it up and getting people to either support it or looked upon it positively like a recruiter would. and so you have this on twitch with a very, a very young audience excuse very, very young. and, and it's kind of a gold mine for recruiters because it's huge, very young, excuse, very male too. and so you kind of have this double edge sword, of like the perfect storm of recruiting for this is very few regulations involved. there's not, there's not a lot of safeguards would you call for regulation of this?

would you call for them to be completely banned out, or what would, what would you call for in respond? i mean, my ideal would be completely band. but right now the regulations are coming from which they're not coming from the government. like for example, the u. s. army i got told by twice that they had to stop. they had those thesis immediately because they used a fake x box controller. give away that when you clicked on it was actually a recruiting website. you said data mine and for me, oh my god, people clicking on it. right. hm. and this was not the government saying, you can't do that. let's, let's switch saying, hey, this goes against our guidelines, please on. wow, what a corporation heard was that? corporations, there was a this is too far for us. right. that's what i, that's what i get really nervous. research suggest that players of violent videogames view, their opponents, ah, as less human. this is concerning to me because we consider that military video game plots are often constructed in ways that mirror real life conflicts around the

globe. a 2016 study looking at a 1st person shooter video game found that some of the most common enemies a multiple games. in fact, they study that some of the most common enemies were russian ultra nationalists. then latin american and middle eastern terrorists. when the military's invested in these types of games doesn't run the risk of making potential soldiers ah view other people the other. as less human, i notice you will have caliber eyes are also seen when he said, nodding tubes. i gotta ask you it. what would you say? yes, and i, i really want to encourage people to critically examine the role of the american psychological association and all of this, particularly the division of military psychology. because when we go back to the beginning of military recruitment, even during the draft during world war 2, and after the draft, when we moved into the poverty draft, when they had to get creative on how to build their force and create

a more lethal force. when they couldn't legally mandate you to be in there force, it goes all the way back to there and going through military training. the objective is for you to dehumanize the manufactured enemy on command. it's to, to, to build your own capacity to the humanize another, a person where, regardless of whether or not you know that because of a story that's told to you. so that's exactly what hollywood does. that's exactly what video games do. especially with the move toward an cyber warfare tron, we're sharing all of these, you know, as, as the military technology advances. so too much the training technology and how convenient for the military for the us government use that the military to have that training already integrated into its recruitment propaganda. wow. which video games are perfect for that? they're absolutely perfect for that. richard, according to the recently launched veterans justice commission,

many veterans struggle with mental health challenges, substance abuse, homelessness criminality. all these things, after leaving the military, roughly one 3rd of veterans report having been arrested or booked into jail after leaving the military, at least once in their lives. we often hear about the highly complex process veterans are forced to navigate in order to access adequate care for injuries for illnesses and especially for post traumatic stress disorder, or p t s. d a. how much does knowing what we know now about p t s d and other emotional, emotional, psychological issues suffer by veterans and the struggle to access adequate care for them. how much does that play in that people not wanting to unless like are people like you know what this is going to in for me badly? yeah. let, i guess let me pay a human story with this. so i'm glad you brought up p t s d. so we are blackburn's project partner with the a law school to do

a study of the last 20 years of disability compensation by by v a. and we're able to show statistically significant disparities. i'm specifically around ptc, a 29 percent disparity and an hour rates that black that's face writes, when you think about that, the disparities when it comes to poverty, that black, that's on a face are twice as likely they represent a full 3rd of the homeless veteran population in the country and in the list can go on and on. but conley monk essentially is taking that data. he is a filed a suit, is a vietnam that who found a suit, brielle ha, in federal court, and i am in, i know this past november and so calmly story i think it is, is emblematic because he joined up as a volunteer in the late the late sixty's i went to vietnam, did 2 tours as, as a marine, their god got into an altercation when someone called him a racial epithet. and next thing, you know, he was on the other side of a dishonorable discharge. it took him 40 years of fighting to get access to the

health care disability compensation to get he wasn't able to use his g i bill to buy home for, for, for, for decades. he wasn't able to gain access education benefits and he is sewing up for back pay for what the b a should have been giving him the whole time. but he's also suing on behalf of his deceased father, who was a world war to veteran and return. it didn't get access to the g. i bill. and i think a carly story, this is one. this is common. this is common in an intergenerational goes back to the composition about intergenerational. ah, the intergenerational impact on families, collies, both of cali sons did not join the military. right. they, they became law enforcement officers. right. but they were, they, they didn't join up there on my age. so i, they, in and i, and i highly doubt that, that, that, that generations that proceed them. well, we'll probably have a very, a very direct conversation about the real consequences of joining. but also the struggles of the families had intergenerational lee of going off serving in america's wars, having to face all untold levels of,

of discrimination and then to come back and not even have equitable access to the benefits that the government has promised. i recently joined in 1st place, right and for the black community, you're talking about compounded in these statistics, tens of billions of dollars siphoned out of the black community because the government had made good on its promise to black veterans who serv absolutely. lanesha caitlin? ah, richard, thank you so much for joining me on up front. everyone that is our show up front. we'll be back next week with ah, a usa was of

interest to people around the world. people pay attention to work with on here, and i'll just, he was very good at bringing the news to the world from here for a meeting of mine. when i was studying the cannon and the curriculum that we were taught was handed down from out where it was an inherited curriculum. that is the image of architecture in the west. architects of mayor valley and alexandra ravenna, thought one there was, you mean, or something that social housing can not provide, which is personal expression. fright studio b unscripted on al jazeera assassination is dissidence, destabilizing, the democratic process. you will, you will lose it. it will be a loss for holding a documentary explorer. how autocratic leaders undermined democracy to consolidate their power through the eyes of those who dare to stand and defy it. our country

deserves so much better than being ruled by a cleft aquatic dictatorship, opposing autocracy. democracy may be on al jazeera, the latest news, as it breaks the fight. thanks. i think just been confined to the capital. both sides claim control of major facilities. but so far it's been hard to confirm who has the upper hand with detailed coverage. people have come here to demonstrate against the rowing police violence in the demonstration from around the world. and even when doctors here are able to make an early diagnosis can guarantee the transportation of the sick. they still faith another challenge. ah ah, doesn't fire should ons, capital cartoon, despite a cease fire being extended by.