[000:00:00;00] the russell did in southern england with 2 farmers trans safari park. pioneers fits the attractive nature in the driving seat. i was just absolutely astonishing. the license pulled back even not sorry, plus somebody. and i'm again sophie, i sent you over to me when, when are you nearing companies revolutionizing? this was the same using funds in our 50 settings image. and here inside you have science. you have technology, fast fries, phone out, your 0, the boat and i'm told stories from age and the pacific on out,

which is 0. the hello, i'm down jordan, joe hall with the quicker mind of the top stories here on i'll just say are the 2nd day of talks for the g. 7 summit has just got underway in the japanese city of hiroshima, as ukrainian president loving me as the landscape will arrive in the country soon to address the leaders of the tools. on friday, leaders of the g. 7 nations have announced new sanctions on russia. are also reports that us is agreed to back international efforts to try and ukrainian pilots on american f. 16 find digits are different. i think it is a james base has more from hiroshima. the effort i think is to get to get the f sixteens. the us made f sixteens to you, craig, the problem for ukraine is that it was always outnumbered in the by russia, but it's lost. a lot of it's fight to get some estimates. say they've lost about 40 and only have about 80 left, so there's a danger that they might lose the skies and that would be

a disaster. so that's why they're pushing so hard for these fight to jets where they're going to get them from. well, that's on clear the moment, but not from the us. it appears to us has dropped to subjection to them having f sixteens, but they don't actually give us apartments themselves. so they'll come from other countries that the sold them to on fridays and ends get dressed. but our bleak summit and jed, it's his 1st official visit to the middle east since rushes invasion began. a cold for support to help protect the ukrainian people, especially it's listed in community i'm sure that we can all be united in saving people from the cages. overall some prisons, unfortunately, and there are some in the world and here and i you who torn a blind eye to those cages and illegal unexcused has and i'm here so that everyone can take an honest look no matter how hard they are. i've since tried to

emphasize as they are, must still be independence. and i want to think so the idea. i want to thank the majority of you for supporting for international positions and the un charter, serbian president bush la side has also attended our big summit. tough to move in a decade of isolation, syria was suspended from the region of block back in 2011 of assets. brutal cracked out on the opposition for testers. so that is, capital has come on the renewed air attacks and fighting between the army and part of the 2 rapids support forces. it comes as the head of the r a safe was removed from the countries routing southern council for the army chief the you and refugee agency says more than a 1000000 people have been displaced in just a month of fighting. and so that at least 250000 among them had been forced to free the country. the united states as a for the 843000. i've been internally displaced. french news agency fees

as gunman have killed at least $40.00 people in a series of attacks in the tank of province in northern looking at fast. so much of the country has been under a state of emergency since much as a government tries to combat groups. the miniature wing of the palestinian islamic john group has paid tribute to come on those killed by his rarely ass price on guns at last week. 6 outputs brigade leaders were killed during 5 days of his ready bombardment. estrada killed at least $33.00 palestinians, including women and children, agreed to cease fire on saturday. thousands of people have been demonstrating in a city and capital build right. following to my shootings that killed 18 people this month, protest as gavin in front of parliament and cold for the resignation of 12 officials. russia's foreign minister. so getting that problem says, uh, media and as a by john not close to reaching a deal to come tensions. and the dispute in touch with nicole know kind of back yard if i'm accused, is back to a blocking the only road link. now, i mean it with the region, which has, i mean the ethnic,

a medium population as i'm blue origin, the space company owned by us building at jeff bay's office has won a contract to build a spacecraft, vanessa. it'll send us a note to the moon. somebody to prove that they is also as has lost balance and previous page to other companies, including fellow bidding that you know must in 2021 that's the awarded must space x . a $3000000000.00 contracts. a lot of estimates of the moon, the 1st time since we have full emission in 1972. those are the headlines and as continues here now just the are off to the price of progress statement. that's what you bye for now. the,

[000:00:00;00] the really the new world, what the industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put the products on the market. we need to regulation, so we don't do crazy things because maybe sometimes we do credit things. i don't know, but except that we have regulation, we once we get asian as english, and if we don't behave then yes, penalty. that's fine. the always case of

the industry makes money. of course it does. if the industry did not make money, how many people will be out of work, the worst sort of the last concern, the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedence. corporate interest, corporate profits have been getting priority with the regulator. so that needs to change, and one of the big ways to do that is just to require transparency. if we, if we lost the transparency, we would like to publish everything we use. it's just not allowed. and we use this . i cannot say we don't care. there's intellect, property rights, but we, if so we publish every things, it will just be breaking the law, the a, prefer intellectual property to the house of children, the,

if you make money out of selling pesticides, how much incentive does these companies do? these companies have to get us off pesticides, who they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or will they make sure that we use always more pesticides? the today industry pieces to spend millions of euro's not being to do this. it reduces the state of researching substitutes and how to make these things differently. the, it's in the industries an interest to bring food to the tables that is safe. that is high quality that is reasonably priced so that you and i, and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good,

nutritious food every day at a reasonable price, the progress and goals risk. you are referring to, to accidents. you just really incidental, i see that. and so people who are injured or who people die every time just happens for industry in general defeats however, those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to progress. and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefits. the, where these progress is progress of moving forwards, whatever, and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful that it's good for the people. we say put some intelligence on what technology and what progresses. i don't think that progress is

routing the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that, that, that can create disease and he's cancer to, to someone who's 20 years old. that's not the, the, the,

if we went today was a progression or principal problem. you will not have openings, and these will not exist because everything, sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 5060000 people die with the accidents. so progression, reprints the point i think is a disaster. and yet, this is what we are now more and more advocating. and you applies these 200 culture . we are farming in europe. we've list substances and most americans, most americans use this tools, you know, seats, because we don't use g m o, 's. we don't use technology. i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not

the and in europe. we have this romantic isaiah or fondles business people. they would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need fittest business people and we shouldn't that them to the business the and we satisfaction to us in any other way, except as the only way that would change is if there is a, a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat food like a global commodity, we have

a very big problem. the and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder and the highest bid or may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bid, or maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food, the reason disease, or what making money profit. it's about the big corporations. it's

about any form of the big uniform lens with one called maximum. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also, economically, it's about international markets import export. it's all about companies controlling in far away places, lands to export commodities. this is another box for production is not about feeding people the news. industrial agriculture is a form of mining and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses at the most of the use go into animal food and text us 5, a fuel, whatever. you have the, the rest of it can be sold more expensive to some other use will go into process

in food processing the so it's foods and necessity. always showed a, a business transaction food as both. yeah. so we all need to eat. that's for sure. but in europe, we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a famine in you of hundreds of years, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one to a month to another month. and we have 10 to you doesn't really matter to us if we have a gym or tomorrow. and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food, no a days. this is the big confusion between which is a genuine interest in the interest of industry. because the priorities drops and

growth and it states, growth and drugs are more important than people's nights. the food industry is successful. if we create more jobs will create more value added, it will create more for so i don't see why. we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry, but this should be a communal fights. of the modern agriculture relies on satellites relies on precision farming, which is the connection between such a license, digital machinery and then all the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as for production, agriculture because of an overly conservative risk rickies

regulation. and these tradeoff between progress and the risk you know, to get under the, i think you're opposite is the best potential to be the leading agricultural region in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs ends in most invested in seats, in a hybridization genetically expressed besides, gave me calls machinery. we shouldn't be because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to it's much in what we want to see is something very different. is the model built on diversity on

biological diversity that is you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations, do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfiguration together? how we operate on this planet? and we will make also subsidies the that's defining, moving, and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they have to be then assistant to our goals. well, as many people, if i say that would say yes, yes, of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through a technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have

a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment are now foot system that operates was in the planetary boundaries. as scientists, i've been to find you with respect the rules of the planet and not vice versa that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms. what progress do we want? are we willing to trade off some of the benefits for some of the risk because we're facing a world which is more, more globalized? so we are up against the other parts of the world, which do not always play with the same rules. the,

there are geo political issues in the past of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the was either $28.00 or 2 producing it themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land. because we found use more land. ecologies more resources the c one cities or the moment just simply the command, they sort of must have a lovely yes accumulate going on. we come into it seem to be side me list the toner last, the plug issue that's got on your plan. okay?

and remember, we want to be in dallas, you may be called the do you imagine the number of friendly diseases that are in every family today is not due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all price concepts? once that's not true. so it is due to an environment and to probably poisons that's out in the environment. what all the chronic bodies is designed to be top 6 initially and spreads all over the place versus the yes it did to share that because as my my daughter book natal,

i'm credit they sit into your to on your continue and put the mama. can you can see have you anything else for me? the cool? no. for the set of model pos. credit to take you to the sign you up to. we didn't talk to the momma. if someone to, to me to you know, meet almost all of my vehicle so they take it easy enough to understand either the high index if, if they've been feeling sort of toxic goes so totally okay. maybe i'm getting the boot the boot the they don't know, go make demos in there. are they usually i like this to be a part of my say with the game this the gets over, the less governor of the less than that i'm is we're getting right now. we'll see

you. i used to live 50 located again out of the nato. the issue i don't do because of it because this will stuff. just keep with any of this is joe bitten menu. us the locate gomez, speed a baby the ship waste, a total of interest to control multiple costs and stuff. yes. by sense not going through our list, decision, toxic us, but a lot of little pre owned by the system. oh no, no. can city finish. i stuck in one piece of extra spit, just use the center they will within by sub dick on us from the know the scene in north canada. she doesn't know she'll put on your leave. we do must be motor.

she'll she'll to you. if you have, we'll get a few minutes. we also put on the the last few months keys take a little bit of root to see if he's wanting you to model you think i'll shoot that to inform you until you meet with. so the seat is seeing football soon cuz he cannot go get it, but i will cuz he will see to it. but i will see that getting in the month to get on the team, go get complement cunning will come. one x 10 must meet with the and so all of us giving it to me updated to be sent over to you and my new product, and we still have them later learn. some of us will be document tomorrow. no, it's on the in coastal stuffy. but don't seem to be on what it was already. i gave it to us as in the me to the receipts in gaithersburg,

but of course don't seem to be the wallet. you'd have to see the little key indeed . why do you happen to send the truck to the media? no. forget about the, the, for the title, and sort of see the of my daughter, caesar thin plastic. go my daughter. see the the law and what i see only in the south end, they've conflict. but a fraud avo, coronado said that the for the real model see of, you know, the ma'am indeed many, it was the openings to modern agriculture have understood that it's and it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to and to use fear as a strong emotional driver for a change in policy and for influencing policy. sometimes it's in the interest of the and see industry groups to do that, as of course,

because it keeps them at work brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes have visits from them. recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and threw me in your and threatening classroom and stuff those but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fight against, when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that we have bows and arrows and they have different bonds. as soon as there's an end, your group of people who are against something, maybe, maybe the advantage, maybe they stop using an increase of importance. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a reason. when i say industry has a truth, we know what's in our products, for example like that. if i, if i make a product mean you can go home this evening. i make a buy a in your kitchen and you know what's. ringback there and you write it down,

that is the truth. sorry, but to know we are an industry, we know what we pushing our products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we put in a quote in our products. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about and i'm not talking about philosophically the truth, i'm talking about what we do, we know what we do and we can talk about it the let to know. though there's a cover, you don't the domain do the video as soon as a face or less on face the 50 seed. these are jam. they put the dollars in the hot . this is easy to both. to please understand the need to is what i'm going to see

it back to normal. acre. uh, and these are house for the if you demo the, these are the guys show me and these in the shit is i'm just calling to find someplace advocacy for $0.50 a month from now. school. they don't on a glass when that was what was on the violence and that was waiting on an additional still under the same most i thought you should or this you may not cause it shows you plenty of because you don't see it. now i'm cold, re coffee, those here it is, it for charlotte, something coffee. the sand for me with the shelter. if he pull look another method for the call. so i'm at the apple to solve cooking to, to pass on i live saw where life the wife is on those car leave. i've done these additional east of precision roller. so i think for me, so i did have

a probably most onto the, a thousands of h u awesome trucks to be lucid from asian country, ending up in western and private collection in a true pot, special with one on one east fuller's request to return asian stolen us effects

the to the general most 10 years in which to shake, hama de, ward for translation and international understanding has become the most important translation award from to the arabic language in the world. the award announces that the nomination periods, the 2023 starts from the 1st of march to the 31st of july. applications are accepted through the awards official website at w w. w dot h t a dot q a is a wave of sentiments around the world. we would actually want accountability from the people who are running their countries. and i think often people's voices, adulthood, because it's not part of the mainstream news market. obviously we cover the big stories and we report from the big events is going on, but we'll say, tell the stories of people generally does have a voice. i mean one of the charm. well, that's the never be afraid to put your hand up and ask a question. and i think that's what obviously everybody does. the all the questions for people who should be accountable. and also if we get people to give that view

of what's going on with the us. hello, i am dire in jordan doe have with a quick reminder of the top stories here on out to 0, the 2nd they have to accept the g. 7 summit has got underway in the japanese city of hiroshima. ukrainian president of them is the landscape will arrive in the country shortly and will address lead as on sunday. on friday, g 70 does announce new sanctions on russia. there are also reports that us has agreed to back international efforts to train ukrainian pilots on american f. 165 digits of different market. it's a james bank has moved from hiroshima. the effort i think is to get to get the f sixteens. the us made f sixteens to you, craig, the problem for ukraine is that it was always outnumbered in the by russia, but it's lost a little bit slight to jet. some estimates say that they've lost about 40 and only have about 18 left, so there's a danger that they might lose the skies and that would be

a disaster. so that's why they're pushing so hard for these fight to jets where they're going to get them from. well, that's on clear the moment, but not from the us. it appears to us has dropped to subjection to them having f sixteens, but they don't actually give us apartments themselves. so they'll come from other countries that the sold them to on fridays and ends the address, the arab league summit and jetta. it's his 1st visit to the middle east since rushes invasion began. he called for support to help protect your training and people, especially it's muslim community. sorry, and president bush, all a side has also attended the arab league summit topped up more than a decade of isolation. syria was suspended from the regional block back in 2011 of assets. brutal cracked on opposition protest. so that is, capital has come on to renew their tax and fighting between the army and rapid support forces. now and its 5th week comes as the head of our staff was removed from the countries routing southern council by the army to the you and reference.

the agency says more than a 1000000 people have been displaced in just a month to fight against them. at least 250000 among them have been forced to free the country for you. and hcr says if the 843000 people have been internally displaced on france, news agency, a piece of government have killed at least 40 people in a series of attacks. and you have 10 prominence involving booking of facet. much of the country has been under a state of emergency since much as a government tries to come back to groups. because the headlines and is continue is here and i'll just say are off to the price of progress station in pennsylvania.

bye for now. of the, [000:00:00;00] the that is that companies have to submit studies to european commission. they do the studies themselves. uh, they have to submitted studio commission and to esa, so they are paying for the safety authority. and they have a panel of experts that looks at the studies and then they say, okay, safe or not. uh so what do we have found is that within the expert panel, she has

a lot of people with dice with the food industry. so that means the conflicts interest the so if someone wants to also replace the product in europe, let's say a plan protection product. this person because this person or this company, the applicant, has to provide data that allows us, as the risk assessors to judge whether this product is safe or not. and this information comes from the applicants and the studies that are commissioned by the applicant to allow us to as that's the safety page by the applicant, obviously. so it's the intellectual property of the applicant. and we can property each box of these studies in the car, in the legal framework. but we also have to respect the pieces confidentiality

claims of the applicants. so there is a balance to be found between transparency as much as possible, but also to protect the, the investment of companies inc to they are products, innovations exactly like in the middle ages, you were asking to the priest, what is a truth in? no, you ask to these scientists and regulatory agencies, what is the truth and they act in the same manner as magician. you know, because they work on secrets, can phones with secrets effects. they say that you cannot police that. however, if i say they have the truth, the,

if you spend a huge amount of money doing, study a study on something. there's a lot of confidential information that you don't want to. another company to copy paste, of course not. i mean, you might have spent years a lot of resources. so people time, a lot of time and money. i'm doing this research at what x that does is it our lives as long as i should publish it, the results. so it will publish and it will come out with the statement at the end and, and it will publish the results, but it will publish all the details and what a lot of people want to see because there are people for our relative eyes or because so it's actually a lot of people, but some people and i want to see everything. that's fine. i think now it's actually a little bit published, but you're talking about several thousands of pages. i don't know who in his white mind would sit down and read through all of those pages. i think some parts can be blacked up, but i would insist that that's to do with privacy. so the relationship between all companies and research institutes and universities is quite strong. and as i

mentioned before, and many parts of the world, it tends to be the public sector developing the products. thanks to relationship with the company. maybe the company donated the technology. the problem in europe, for example, is that an s, so that you mentioned before, they have scientists assessing the products. and the scientists have a obligation to have no conflict of interest. that means they have to have, have no relationship whatsoever with industry ever. so if you're a scientist and you're having a, any kind of dealing with a company close as a number of avenues of work later. so again, we are ready champions and creating difficulties for ourselves in europe, but the rest of the world is doing fine. the

running around or jo hollingsworth for monsanto. and with me is my partner, eric lasker, and to on his right is john kayla. and next to john is mimi line right now. the thank you very much. know we moved here college to the 2nd final, which will look at the transparency and use of scientific studies and the assessment the life of state in the united states. and the hopefully will provide insight into the so called most of the papers. thank you very much. for inviting me

to be here today as a journalist for some 30 years now, i'm someone who has spent most of my life focusing on facts pursuing the truth. i've spent roughly 20 of those 30 years delving into the dealings of monsanto. and i can confidently tell you that the story of the company's top sewing chemical glasses. 8 is not one of truth, but one of the seats. it's sort of a treasure trove and look inside a very big and powerful company that has been very secretive, you know, for decades. and a lot of the information is quite alarming. when it comes to public health and safety associated with the use of their popular product life. and satan round up. another way in which montana has manipulated regulators and the public is by establishing networks of scientists around the world to support its agenda. and it's message about the safety of this chemical, monsanto, and, or the monsanto back let's, as a task force, pays them the lobby regulators. they author papers, essentially, to push this message that the chemical is safe. there are many individuals and there are many types of different relationships that we've seen in these documents

. you can see here that professor david kirkwood is one such paid, expert montana, was relying on the 2012 months. and it was very worried about gino toxicity questions arising from 5 to say, research, whether it in gauge kirkland, monsanto needed someone to help counter these concerns that were for assisting what bill hayden's wrote in the email, i think i was just naive. and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision. we all have decades of experience in the industry,

and therefore we have reputations to maintain. and that means that there is no point in those being all responding to the influence of, of one stakeholder over another. because those reputations wouldn't be destroyed. i can say absolutely an attempt to go like categorically this paper was not ghost written. we all inputs our own sections to the paper. there was no input involvement or influence of the review by monsanto. thank you. thank you. well, it seems a pair of the month santo, actually fears, real independent, authentic science months center set itself. it feared the i arc review when it found done in 2014. this is for eric sat down before the classification. monsanto says that fears this, it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability and epidemiology toxicology geno talks. most center officials even predicted the glass, the state would warrant a possible or probable rating with respect to f,

as in echo no. f, as a process is defined as a peer review, and i understand that and that's, i don't have a problem with that peer review problem in this case is that's not, was, was done. nobody went back and verified the findings on the original studies. and by failing to verify those findings, it cascaded through the entire review process, such that you don't have the answer which is based on the best science. how soon does he say important to me some that we have doing the proper independent assessment and that the according to the results of the be happy nessa, according to the regulations that focus on the use of the active assessments. and based on that, we generate the risk assessments regarding the independence from industry is clearing the legislation. i would say the 6 is the basic principle, the company that the ones to market something the you must pay for the assessment. so this studies have conducted by industry. the result of the current process is

scientifically floyd. it is time to have an independent panel assigned to evaluate the way in which the science is reviewed. there's a need for the regulatory agencies to re analyze the data, and there's a need to publicly publicly release all of the analyses and data to improve the transparency of this process. these are not the actions of a company that has nothing to hide. this is not how you promote a product. this is that's actually proven safe. this is how you whitewash unfortunate and unprofitable facts. this is not by accident, but by design, and it serves monsanto very well, but it does not seem that it serves the public interest. thank you. of the monsanto prepared certain documents for the registration and the s a report if you look at it has taken directly certain language from the monsanto documents and just placed it in

the us a report. so there's a lot of concern about whether, as i really did an independent analysis or whether they just took the position to be against i or at monsanto's request. so that is not an independent assessment. how can we verify or expect that on the basis of such robust scions and i'm quoting industry, we can make a decision. politicians in the end, you can make a decision to protect that people that if somebody you know has said hello to the industry at some stage in his life, that should not mean that that particular scientist should be banned from a panel. or, you know, research has been funded somewhere by someone. many of the scientists that have longer than half now left the organization and their science panels because they have been accused of having worked with the industry. but since when does that make a science has dishonest of the why? so having worked with the industry some years ago on the small projects, at some stage i did, i'm assigned just by training. and when i was in university,

of course, i was looking for a grant to do my research, because some research can cost a lot of money. i was helped by industry. i haven't spoken to that particular industry now for for many, many years. it's been a long time since i was in college. um, but that doesn't mean i'm dishonest as a scientist. the know you are students to be in the region where influence is very high and also regions look at your for, for regulation. and

that's why it's so important that you're at the keeps regulation which is scientific, which is database in which as much as possible decides results being influenced by by i would say by noise or by and just the emotions and fear the with science meets values. and it's becoming complicated as we come with science with evidence we do as a scientific process of risk assessment. but then this evidence is given on another stage on the policy level, there believes emotions,

values come in. and what we see is a 40 additions don't like the outcome of our risk assessment. they don't question the, i believe they question the validity of the process. so basically if it's a comes with an opinion, let's say on the, on the continuing its in 60 sites, what additional the love i've so they want the full as so you are protecting the bees. you're doing the right thing really going to act on there. so we all upload it to you, and it's the same process with the same people. use the same scrutiny. comes with the conclusion. let's say i'm glad for say, people say, i'm sorry, i don't like these off come. if so, she would not say you the type of say this, right? that'd be pretty safe. so if so must be corrupt. i find this very bizarre. the, you know, regulations is independent of corporate influence and, and it's everything is tested,

actually tested. and with a lot of money and, and, and, and our authorities are looking at it independently. i don't know where these people have been living even in some of the mainstream, john, is you doing fine reports that clearly explained that this is not happening. we are seeing corporate culture not only in the sciences it sciences is one of the fields we see corporate capturing in every walk of life. the . i'd like to say it seems to be very highly charged. nope, because of the safety of dr for say. but because of g and because of months on though, because of international trade, maybe even because of new quality,

with global traits. supercharger assessments itemized. i guess it's in motion for positive, 50 feet, then to facade, supposed to out and put in that over. done. yeah. and many other marks from positive models and see if it was to take your next directions, the list of atom, people, sites, the votes. goodness districts really awesome thought fill out the of course, if the science is works for the company, that's a different story. but i think we need to be a little bit more realistic about what it is we want. do we want the best scientists to assess the products to get to make sure they're safe? or do we want to make sure there's no conflict of interest? what does the objective is of the safety of the product? because of the conflict of interest of the, of the scientist. i think we need to be

a bit more honest and trustworthy without forwarding into the mistake so. so that's not something that we are looking for. i mean, the, the, the experts we use are as independent as possible. but i think also here it's not black or white. it's not c or, or one that's not the digital binary approach. we have to find the right balance between the best expertise between people that have done research, the people that are with both feet in, in the scientific endeavor. and on the other end to make sure that there is no conflict of interest. and if i may say, or somebody i think europe needs to make a decision whether we know i think i stop here. yes. that's what leads to far

too much, but they don't show us cafe. when people shook up, i'll see of it then. and best phone us, 500 going to somebody's house here. and there's a total of new villas. the left americas, eunice put a sample of a 100 on funding for we in last or, you know, once he left that i live in atlanta. so he doesn't like and see that this one that's good at all. humble, simply a little bit less, but i, we have a local machine or banners, but i'm in total bill control. i can see that this one. let's get that off on. let's go here. i don't know if that's alice, but if we is kind of think that the cutting, that's the so yes, precautionary principle is and di, scientific entities. i think it's

a big issue for your opinion in general because it reduces the income is the willingness of sudden investment the there is a risk in registering and you participate. this is a risk. this is a benefits. i'm a willing to take this risk. yes or no, and the regulation today gives us an answer. if you look at the car of today, it is much safer than the called yesterday. you know, the 1st car that i drove in when i was a boy and my father was driving, had no safety built in house. no, i had no airbag and now no abs and. and yet the comic or was not a murder. it is a car was like this and it was a very safe car for the time. and i'm not saying that the bessie says of 1950. uh you know where? fantastic. but by then there were very with bessy side,

and then we just go over the house on the side effects and then the regulation. evils and regression becomes more demanding and especially sides of bond or are withdrawn from the company. and that's no more that's normal. it will ition of any industry, the power of innovation doesn't come from the big companies. the big companies are too big to be innovative anymore. i just want to preserve that privilege as but they're not innovating anymore. let me look at, look at the, the, the, the, in the past, the sites were dealing with gm plants that were develop 30 years ago. nothing has changed. its be notified resistance since the beginning it's old kind of color. so the innovation innovation is that we now have in addition to round the ready. busy and roundup resist implants, we have become a resistant plans and to for the resistance players. so we're getting an even more cocked toxic cocktail, even though it's,

that's innovation. it has to get out. it just has to get out the benefits versus risk, right? what is a risk you are willing to accept on the environment? even if it's very small, in order to have a safe and affordable suits of like, the, to me, the defining factor in the future will also be around all acro fruit system. if we manage to get our, in my view, this functional aggregate foot system on a sound, environmental, economic, social, and economic basis. then we solved everything else will come from even climate change and these things health issues and our mental issues, social issues are collateral. they're all part of the,

of this whole thing that is connected. and the connect, the connecting, sent a piece is, is food. and how you produce the, because we see the world as these we are in fact, at the border age of the revolution. because human kind of is able to do it, but or how much time that will take, how much i mean misery of that will create. i don't know, but that's i'm for me, you know, very, it's

a french writer co pay a hobby. he said, this is a collie bri, i fare. so i'm just a little bird in the system doing my job as much like the in europe. we're not going to give off went off and there are lots of other technologies. it's not just about jim or there are lots of other technologies coming up and the companies are committed to invest in europe as well. despite that, being so uncomfortable is a euphemism to work of

the smoke from the size of the building, your western kansas spread right across the northern plain states of the us to was eastern calendar, the east coast of the us. now, the files will keep burning for another day or 2, but there is rain coming, current, right? and on the eastern side, significant might even produce a few from the stones in the southern states of the us to the not particularly big . there is some rain forecasts be around the desert southwest, not a lot for literally maybe to see significant rain that brought time to get to sunday. the 1st hint of a change taking place in western counters. good, stop, spring time stanley will be persistent, right? it will help was fighting the fight as is dried up in the east. and the shouts here at west texas, oklahoma. i'm not particularly big. they might be big in florida. they might be big in the bahamas and down through hispanic mueller. maybe eastern cube or in jamaica savings through mexico goods. but it shows that nothing unusual for this time. the,

as is the case in south america, the likely heaviest and this normal belt of re using western columbia may be and i could go on the line. it shows my joy, i down to was the river plate where it was so boom, recently you knowledge and teen. and sheila attempted to come down to normal or bit below i of the approved or reject the most progressive constitution ever proposed for any nation in history. yes, for chile folks, even though the big picture, aust, why a question. the builds into the very foundation of julie into the dog called if it's relationship with indigenous people. them a boucher and the missiles, the big picture coming through on that,

which is a unique bowman processed by a palestinian nowadays using a symbol of national identity to create postage and passport stamps. but i was from december nice clear to bill that comes flying anyway, sending a message of resistance about the arab israeli conflict. kind of sort of where you come to by this time. palestine sundance, the stamp of defiance on out is even a report is retreat in a brutal civil war. if it comes to hadn't been, that they use writing vision with not being so well for the coming door. had become gentleness like center. you could be in the safe and safe, and then you went out into civil war. i started of leaving this one of the grand

suite, have to come to a hotel. the next room i was in was underground,