always talk to people that have different opinions that we do. everyone has a voice message. it appears that society doesn't do enough to recognize and celebrate women. it was it was fun to have an american occupation for meetings and countries. the street on algae 0, the madison in doha detailed stories and all just 0 rushes as troops of care to more than 70 fighters stage and attack in the belgrade region which borders and ukraine. john hall reports across the board of raid apparently carried out by ethnic russians on russian territory. there is much about these images that doesn't seem to fit yet. the men from 2 groups called the russia volunteer corps, and the liberty of russia legion claimed to have captured several towns close to the ukrainian border. forward units they reported on twitter, had entered the town of grave or on home to

a russian ministry base where they used drones to attack the local headquarters with russia security service the f s. b. these pictures cannot be independently verified video and social media posts to show 2 men making their escape in a captured homage vehicle the font is described themselves as russian citizens opposed to the kremlin. that could be seen here wearing ukrainian insignia in a video statement posted on social media when we think, here's what i see on the statement rails against big, tight to ship and the official corruption in russia, as in what some of the c as a possible friendly to ukraine's long anticipated counter offensive. think this 3 ames of, of an action like we've seen in belgrade at 1st me, it's to tide and fix as many russian forces in the area as possible. so that they can't find areas where you provide may actually attack a 2nd in the it's to show to russians across their media. that the actually,

the war has come to russia and on their territory in a small way. and finally, to a virus bit in the attacks spock, the evacuation of russian citizens from the area as the authority said, account to terrorism, opperation was underway. these images relate to release by the defense ministry rushes retaliation. it said, claiming to have killed dozens of fighters residents later said they've never seen anything like it that of the gums, then motors, machine guns, said this man. it was full on fighting home the blood stains with testament to gradual teeth. well, the specifics are unclear. speaking to reporters by phone, the kremlin spokesman said the attack as well. ukrainian assist you to the greatest gabriel look, the ukrainian militants from ukraine. there are many ethnic russians living in ukraine, but they all ukrainian minutes. and anyway, in response,

ukraine said it had, quote, nothing to do with it. joe know how l g 0 and investigations whitening into hundreds of depths linked to a cold in kenya, a pasta was accused of ordering his followers to starve themselves to death. please say they've searched the church of a 2nd static study, or maybe up by the usa. they're verifying reports of violations of a cease fire. and so done, they broke the 7 day choose between citizens wanting factions, came into force on monday and to allow in for monitoring and assistance. in occupations it says 25000000 people instead of in need of a lot of the governor wrong dissenters is expected to officially launch his bid for the 2024 presidential election on wednesday. is expected to be the leading challenger to the main republic and contend it. former presidents, donald trump, a police and guy on a say a fire and a school dormitory that led to the desk. so at least 19 pupils was started by one of the students. they say she was upon feet angry officer,

her mobile phone was confiscated as, as a protest, as of march to israel's parliament. the connected head of the approval of a new budget demonstrate his accuse of moving coordination of looting states. money by minister benjamin netanyahu is already under pressure over the plan to change the legal system. wildfires of buttons threw over a 1000000 hectares and the canadian province of alberta. nearly 3 files and firefighters are responding and torrential downpours along spring south east coast, a force the close of schools and the roads. despite the heavy rain, this spring is expected to be spans of dry us, since records begun. those are the headlines we're going to be back in about 25 minutes. so you then the,

[000:00:00;00] the really the new world, what industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put the products on the market. we need

a regulation so we don't do crazy things because maybe sometimes who we do credit things i don't know, but except that we have regulation. we once we get ation as english and if we don't behave then yes, penalty. that's fine. the always case of the industry makes money, of course it does. if the industry did not make money, how many people will be on work or sort of the last concern, the public interest and the public safety is definitely not taking precedence. corporate interest, corporate profits had been getting priority with the regulator, so that needs to change. and one of the big ways to do that is just to require transparency we've, since we last transparency we have with likes to publish everything we use. it's just not a lot and we use x. i cannot say we don't care. there's intellect, property rights, but we,

if so we publish everything. it would just be breaking the law, the a, prefer intellectual property to the house of children. the if you make money out of selling pesticides, how much incentive does these companies do? these companies have to get us off pesticides, who they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or who they make sure that we use always more pesticides. the today industry pieces to spend millions of euro's not being to day radiation is the state of researching, substitutes and how to make these things different.

the, it's in the industries an interest to bring food to the tables that is safe. that is high quality. that is reasonably priced so that you and i and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good, nutritious food every day as a reasonable price. the progressing goals risk. you are referring to, to accidents. you just real easy to and so i see that and so people who are injured or who, who people die every time just happens for industry in general, defeats the however, those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and 2 programs. and the reason progress without analysis of risk versus benefits, the, where the progress is probate moving forwards, whatever,

and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful that it's good for, for the people we, we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progresses. i don't think that progress is routing the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that 15 that can create disease and he's cancer to, to someone who's 20 years old. that's not

the if we went today was a profession, your principal problem, even we don't have openings and these would not exist because everything, sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 5060000 people die with the accidents. so percussion, reprints the point i think is a disaster. and yet, this is what we are now. one more advocating. and you applies these 200 culture. we are farming in europe with less substances than most americans. most americans use this tools, you know,

seats because we don't use gym was we don't use technology. i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not the and in europe, we have this romantic idea or formulas business people. they would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need fittest business people and we shouldn't that them to that business the and we can't expect them to act in any other way except as

the only way that would change is if there is a, a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat like a global commodity, we have a very big problem. the and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder and the highest bid or may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bid, or maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food, the, the,

the aggregation disease, all about making money, the profit in some of the big corporations. it's about any form of the big uniform lens with one called maximum. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also, economically, it's about international markets import export. it's all about companies controlling in far away places, lands bricks, board, commodities. there's another box for production is not about feeding people. the industrial agriculture is

a form of mining and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses at the most of the use go into animal food and text outs, 5 of fuel, whatever you have the, the rest of it can be sold more expensive to some other use will go into process in food processing. the so is fluid and necessity. always food, a business transaction, food as both. yeah. so we all need to eat. that's for sure. but in europe we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in, in your hands to yourself. we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one to a month to another month. so we have 10 to you. doesn't really matter to us if we have

a gym or tomorrow and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food, no a days. this is the big confusion between which is a genuine interest in the interest of industry. because the priorities drops and growth and it states bruce at jobs are more important to people's nights. the, if the food industry is successful, will create more jobs, will create more value added, it will create more for so i don't see why. we shouldn't also fight for the interest of the industry, but this should be a community of fights to modern agriculture relies on satellites relies on precision farming,

which is the connection between satellites digital machinery and then all the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as pre production in agriculture because of an overly conservative risk. ricky's regulation and these tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what under the i think your opposite is the best potential to be the leading agricultural region in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs ends in most invested in seats, in

a hybridization genetic expressly sites gave me calls machinery. we shouldn't be because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to it's much what we want to see is something very different as the model built on diversity on biological diversity. that is, you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations, the do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfiguration together. how we operate on this planet. all we will make also subsidies the that's defined. and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they have to be then assistant to our goals. well, many people, if i say that would say yes, yes,

of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through a technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment are now foot system that operates was in the planetary boundaries. as scientists, i've been to find you where i respect the rules of the planet and not vice versa, that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms what progress do we want? are we willing to trade off some of the benefits for some of the risk because we're

facing a world which is more and more globalized? so we are up against the other parts of the world, which do not always play with the same rules. the, there are geo political issues in the past of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the was either to 8 or to producing it themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land because we found use more land. ecologies more resources

the, let's see, one cities are they momentum. just simply that command, they sort of must have a lovely yes accumulate going on. we come into the scene to the side of the list that don't allow us the plug issue, this guy, no collateral game for the moment. either one of them be invalid. you may be called the do you imagine the number of from the diseases and that's are in every family today is not due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all breast cancer funds. that's not true. so it is due to an environment and to probably poisons

that. the numbers, what all the pri make, poisons designed to be toxic, initially and spread all over the place for us to start the yes it did to should it didn't cause i'm, i'm either book need all that i'm credit this you think that you're trying you continue and when i put the mama can, you can see have you anything else for me, the cool, no flip side of my the p o s will credit to take you to this time you got to the momma you from i told you my desktop equal you know, mean i'm a pull of my vehicle so they take to the end of the sun, either the volume, this is the best to go see on. so it looks, it goes to look pulling a maybe

a bit of the, they don't know, go make demos and there are they usually i like this to be a photo must say what the game this the guess over the less cover the what the noise levels to i usually 50 located and again out of the nato. the issue of the i don't do because of it because this will start to skip with any of this is joe bitten menu. us the locate golden layer of a speed, a baby, the ship waste, a total of interest to more people cost that stuff. yes. by sent on throw less this . you soon talk. see gus, but a lot of it broke the own, but i'll just use the modem on, on oak, on city finish. i stuck in on piece of stuff. they just use the set of the within by subject on us from the know the say no,

i cannot. the she doesn't know to put on your leave. we do must you model she'll, she'll to you. if you have we will get a few minutes. we also bundle the last few months to open up route to see these wanting you to might be think i'll shoot it to me from you until you meet with the media to see a scene football field because he cannot go get it. but i won't because he will see to it, but we'll see if the getting into month to get on the team. go get, put a lot of them in the top corner mechanical components and we will, we will put a line. so all of us giving it to monthly 2 weeks, an audio and most new product, and we've tended them later and some of us will be document tomorrow. no patient

the in the most guffy, but they'll seem to be on board kaloni cut a plus 40. i gave it to us as in the me to go, she's in give me a buzz back and forth. don't seem to be the wallet. you'd have to think what. okay . and do i didn't know i had to talk to them. yeah, no, forget about to do the for the title and sort of see though, my daughter caesar thin plastic go my daughter, see the the law and what i see only in the south end, they've conflict. but a lot of those go not law say that the funny little model see of, you know, the ma'am indeed many, it was the open and to modern agriculture have understood that it's un,

it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to and to use fear as a strong emotional driver for a change in policy and for influencing policy. sometimes it's in the interest of the industry groups to do the ass, of course, because it keeps them at work, brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides . we sometimes have visits from them. recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and threw me in your and threatening classroom stuff hospice but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not, we, you know, when we fight against, when we fights, he gets when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that and we have bows and arrows and they have iron bones. as soon as there's an end, your group of people who are again something maybe, maybe the advantage, maybe they stop using it,

maybe they sell them 14. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has a truth. we know what's in our products, for example like that. if i, if i make a product mean you can go home. this evening and make it by a, in your kitchen and you know, what's. ringback there and you write it down, that is the truth. sorry, but to know we are an industry, we know what we pushing our products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we push them across in our products. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about and i'm not talking about philosophically the truth, i'm talking about what we do, we know what we do and we can talk about that the,

let them know hey, cover you the domain, the video, assume that they face or less something, the 50 seed, these are jam, they put it on and then i have read the book to please understand and they push what i'm into, see it back to them on acre. uh, and these are house for the if you demo the, the very last you, me and these, the citizen just to, you know, find someplace god, you see for $0.50 a month from now school, they don't on a glass when that was where we don't need science and that was putting on doing visual, still under the see most of those you may or was it shows you for the or the coffee. don't see it. no, no, our quotes re coffee, those here it does it for several or something. coffee,

they'll send for me with his shots if he pulls the 3rd party consumer apple to solve for cook. and it could pass on. i live side where they have the hour for zones on those car leave. i've done this, i shall east of precision roller. so i think for me, so i did have a probably most onto the man who dominated the reality politics throw the 30 i'll just 0 will tells the extraordinary story of nobody else who's to buy to exile of the depth of to came a day while the king was reading through the 1st to a switch where it was tonight,

who was prime minister 14 times until he's lucky eventually run out. the rocky power broke out just 0. the to the journey of almost 10 years in which the shakonda award for translation and international understanding has become the most important translation award from to the arabic language in the world. the award announces that the nomination periods, the 2023 starts from the 1st of march to the 31st of july. applications are

accepted through the awards official website at w w, w dot h t, a dot q a the, i'm about as an adult at the top stories on ology 0. russia says, troops have killed more than 70 fighters who staged and attack, and the bell had all the region bordering ukraine. 2 groups, claiming to be fighting for the liberation of russia, say they will behind the attack. moscow based journalist. so you'll need a shuffle of all the while it has the latest and what the kremlin is saying about the attack. or while the ministry of defense blamed key is filled, that's hogs in the legs and statements. they send us a key of suffered defeats being a tool moves that the russian name of the flute

a several days ago. they've switch through carrying out terrorist attacks against the civilian population of russia is beginning on monday and also heavier showing a unit of ukrainian nationalists invaded russian territory. that's according to the russian defense ministry. and as when to stand as a result of this trying to russian soldiers were killed a full interest in investigations whitening into hundreds of debts, linked to accounts in kenya, and the pasta was accused of ordering his followers to starve themselves to death. please say the search, the church of a 2nd clinic, saudi arabia and the united states to say they're verifying reports of violations of a c spot. and so done, they broke or the 7th day choose between sedans warning factions. it came into force on monday to allow in humanitarian assistance. lot of the governor of on desantis is expected to officially launch has been for the 2024 presidential election on wednesday. is expected to be the leading challenges of the main

republic and contender, former president donald trump policing guy on a say a fire and a school geometry that led to the deaths of at least 19 pupils was started by one of the students. they say she was upon the angry officer, her mobile phone was confiscated sizes of protests, of mars to israel's parliament, taken access to the head of the approval of a new budget demonstrates is accused of running coalition of looting, state money. farmers have benjamin nothing. yeah. who's all wrong that we're ready under pressure over the plan to change the legal system, even though it's been delayed. the funds has bind domestic short whole slides. whatever that same journey can be made by a train in under 2 and a half hours. the changes are part of funds is 2021 climate fall, which means to cut compound emissions. bye for now. of

the that is that companies have to submit studies to european commission. they do the studies themselves after submitted studio commission and to esa, so they are paying food safety authority. and they have a panel of experts that looks at studies and then they say, okay, safe or not. uh so what do we have found is that within these expert panels, we have a lot of people with dice with the food industry. so that means the co 6 interest the so if someone wants to also replace the product in your, let's say

a plan projection product. this person because this person or this company, the applicant, has to provide data that allows us, as the risk assessors to judge whether this product is safe or not. and this information comes from the applicants and the studies that are commissioned by the applicant to allow us to assess the safety piece by the applicant, obviously. so each the intellectual property of the applicants and we can property each box of these studies in the car in the legal framework. but we also have to respect the pieces confidentiality claims of the applicants. so there is a balance to be found between transparency as much as possible, but also to protect the investment of companies in to they are products. innovations exactly like in the middle ages,

you were asking to the priest, what is a truth in? no, you ask to these scientists and regulatory agencies, what is the truth and they act in the same manner as magician? you know, because they work on secret can phones, we see chris effects. they say that you cannot police that however they say they have the truth. the if you spend i sewage amount of money doing study a study on something. there's a lot of confidential information that you don't want. another company to copy paste. of course not. i mean, you might have spent years a lot of resources, so people time a lot of time and money on doing this research at what x that does is it i'm or

lies as long as i can publish it, the results. so it will publish and it will come out with the statement at the end and, and it will publish the results, but it will publish all the details of what a lot of people want to see because there are people for the, for the relative eyes. ok, because so it's actually a lot of people, but some people and i want to see everything. that's fine. i think now it's actually a little bit published, but you're talking about several thousands of pages. i didn't know who in his white mind would sit down and read through all of those pages. i think some parts can be blacked up, but i would insist that that's to do with privacy. so the relationship between all companies and research institutes and universities is quite strong. and as i mentioned before, and many parts of the world, it tends to be the public sector developing the products. thanks to relationship with a company, maybe the company donate to the technology. the problem in europe, for example, is that an s, so that you mentioned before, they have scientists assessing the products. and the scientists have

a obligation to have no conflict of interest. that means they have to have, have no relationship whatsoever with industry ever. so if you're a scientist and you're having a, any kind of dealing with a company close as a number of avenues of work later. so again, we are really champions and creating difficulties for ourselves in europe, but the rest of the world is doing fine. the running around or jo hollingsworth for monsanto. and with me is my partner, eric lasker, and to on his right is john caleb. and next to john is maybe line right in

the thank you very much know your colleagues to the 2nd final which will look at the transparency and use of scientific studies and the assessment of life proceed in the united states. and the hopefully will provide insight into the so called most of the papers. thank you very much for inviting me to be here today as a journalist for some 30 years now. i'm someone who has spent most of my life focusing on facts pursuing the truth. i've spent roughly 20 of those 30 years delving into the dealings of monsanto. and i can confidently tell you that the story of the company's top sewing chemical glasses say is not one of truth,

but one of defeat. it's sort of a treasure trove and look inside a very big and powerful company that has been very secretive, you know, for decades. and a lot of the information is quite alarming. when it comes to public health and safety associated with the use of their popular product life and state and around it. another way in which monsanto has manipulated regulators and the public is by establishing networks of scientists around the world to support its agenda. and it's message about the safety of this chemical, monsanto, and, or the monsanto back let's, as a task force, pays them the lobby regulators. they author papers, essentially, to push this message that the chemical is safe. there are many individuals and there are many types of different relationships that we've seen in these documents . you can see here that professor david kirkwood is one such paid, expert, montana, was relying on

the 2012 months and it was very worried about, you know, talk specific questions arising from like to say, research when it engaged person. monsanto needed someone to help counter these concerns that were for assisting what bill hayden's wrote in the email. i think i was just naive and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision. we all have decades of experience in the industry, and therefore we have reputations to maintain. and that means that there is no point in those being all responding to the influence of, of one stakeholder over another. because those reputations wouldn't be destroyed. i can say absolutely an attempt to go like categorically this paper was not ghost

written. we all inputs our own sections to the paper. there was no input involvement or influence of the review by monsanto. thank you. thank you. well, it seems a pair of them on central actually fears. real independent, authentic science. monsanto said itself, it feared the arc review when it found in in 2014. this is for eric, sat down before the classification. monsanto says it fears this. it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability and epidemiology toxicology, geno talks, montana officials even predicted the glass, the state would warrant a possible or probable rating. us with respect to epsilon, echo um, you know, s as a process is defined as a peer review and i understand that and that's, i don't have a problem with that peer review problem in this case is that's not, was, was done. nobody went back and verified the findings on the original studies. and

by failing to verify those findings, it cascaded through the entire review process, such that you don't have the answer, which is based on the best science hudson's of the say, important information that we have doing the proper independent assessment at that the, according with the results of the be happy nesa according to the regulations that focus on the use of the active assessments. and based on that we generate the risk assessments regarding the independence from industry is clearing the legislation. i would say the 6 is the basic principle, the company that the once the market, something the you must pay for the assessment. so the studies have conducted by industry that is built up. the current process is scientifically floyd. it is time to have an independent panel assigned to evaluate the way in which the science is reviewed. there's a need for the regulatory agencies to re analyze the data, and there's a need to publicly publicly release all of the analyses and data to improve the

transparency of this process. these are not the actions of a company that has nothing to hide. this is not how you promote a product. this is that's actually proven safe. this is how you whitewash unfortunate and unprofitable facts. this is not by accident, but by design, and it serves monsanto very well, but it does not seem that it serves the public interest. thank you. the monsanto prepared certain documents for the registration and the as a report, if you look at it, has taken directly certain language from the monsanto documents and just placed it in the report. so there's a lot of concern about whether f so really did an independent analysis or whether they just took the position to be against i or at monsanto's request. so that is not an independent assessment. how can we verify or expect that on the basis of such robust scions? and i'm quoting industry, we can make

a decision. politicians in the and you can make a decision to protect the people that if somebody you know, has said hello to the industry at some stage in his life, that should not mean that that particular scientist should be banned from a panel. or, you know, research has been funded somewhere by someone. many of the scientists that have longer than half now left the organization and their science panels because they have been accused of having worked with the industry. but since when does that make a scientist dishonest? the why. so having worked with the industry some years ago on the small projects, at some stage i did, i'm a scientist by training. and when i was in university, of course i was looking for a grant to do my research. because some research can cost a lot of money. i was helped by industry. i haven't spoken to that particular industry now for for many, many years. it's been

a long time since i was in college. but that doesn't mean i'm dishonest. as a scientist. the know you're extends to be in the region where influence is very high and other regions look at your for it for regulation. and that's why it's so important that you're at the keeps regulation which is scientific, which is database. and which as much as possible, decides results being influenced by,

by i would say by noise or by just the emotions and fear the with science meets values. and it's becoming complicated. or we come with the science with evidence we do. and as a scientific process of risk assessment, but then this evidence is given on another stage on the policy levels. they are believes emotions, values come in. and what we see is a 40 additions don't like the outcome of our risk assessment. they don't question the i believe they question the validity of the process. so basically if it's a comes with an opinion, let's say on the, on the continuing its in 60 sites, what additions allows,

i have so they wonderful as so you are protecting the bees. you're doing the right thing, really going to act on there. so we all applaud to you, and it's the same process with the same people. use the same scrutiny. comes with the conclusion. let's say i'm glad for say, people say, i'm sorry, i don't like these off come. if so should not say the die for say this relative pretty safe. so if so must be corrupt. i find this very bizarre. the, you know, regulations is independent of corporate influence and, and it's everything is tested, actually tested and with a lot of money and, and, and, and our authorities are looking at it independently. i don't know where these people have been living even in some of the mainstream. john,

as you don't find reports that clearly explained that this is not happening. we are seeing corporate capture not only in the sciences it sciences is one of the fields we see corporate capturing in every walk of life. the . i'd like to say it seems to be very highly charged. not because of the safety of dr for say, but because of g and because of one song though, because of international trade, maybe even because of inequality with global traits. supercharger says smith writes on my screen, i guess it's too much for positive 50 feet. then you facade supposed to been put in at all, then. yeah, and medium box models. if it was to detect the direction solution to

that in piece of socks, the volt business district is really awesome. thought, fill out the of course, if the science is works for the company, that's a different story. but i think we need to be a little bit more realistic about what it is we want. do we want the best scientists to assess the products, the guess to make sure they're safe? or do we want to make sure there's no conflict of interest? what does the objective is of the safety of the product? because of the conflict of interest of the, of the scientist, i think we need to be a bit more honest and trustworthy without falling into the mistake sense. so that's not something that we are looking for. i mean, the, the, the experts we use are as independent as possible, but i think also here it's not black or white. it's not 0 or one that's not the

digital binary approach. we have to find the right balance between the best expertise between people that have done research, the people that are with both the feet in, in the scientific endeavor. and on the other end to make sure that there is no conflict of interest. and if i may say, or somebody, i think europe needs to make a decision whether we know, i think i stop here. yes. that's what leads to far the change, but they don't subscribe to the impulse. she'll get off of it then and push on us of a 100 going to allow us already. so i see on is a total of in the village, the left americans unit attempt to take a set that all the 100 of funding for we in last or 22nd. and once he left that i

live in atlanta. so need to look into this one. i see that on simply a little say less, but i really like to meet you in the band and, but i'm in total bill, you have the control that i can see that that's one that's good for the son. and he had enough, is that that list, but if we is kind of think that the cutting that the so yes, precautionary principle is and di, scientific entities. i think it's a big issue for europe and economy in general because it reduces the income, the willingness of some investment the there is a risk in registering a new purchase. so this is a risk. this is a benefit. i'm

a willing to take this risk. yes or no, and the regulation today gives us an answer. if you look at the car of today, it is much safer than under called yesterday. you know, the 1st car that i drove in when i was a boy and my father was driving, had no safety built in house. no, i had no airbag and now no abs and uh, and its z acom acre was not a murder. is it is a car was like this and it was a very safe car for the time. and i'm not saying that the best, the size of 1950. uh you know where fantastic. but by then, there were very with bessy side, and then we just go over the house on the side effects and then the regulation. evils and regression becomes more demanding and especially sides of bond or withdrawn from the company. and that's no more that's normal. it will ition of any industry. the power of innovation doesn't come from the big companies. the big

companies are too big to be innovative anymore. i just want to preserve that privilege is, but they're not innovating anymore. let me look at, look at the, the, the, the in the past, the sides. we're dealing with gm plants that were develop 30 years ago. nothing has changed. it's b, t and the other side resistance since the beginning it's old color. so the integration innovation is that we now have in addition to round the ready. busy and round it resist implants, we have become a resistant plans and to for the resistance players. so we're getting an even more cocked, toxic cocktail adults. that's innovation. it has to get out. it just has to get benefits versus risk, right? what use a risk you're willing to accept on the environment? even if it's very small, in order to have a safe and affordable suits of like,

the, to me, the defining factor in the future will also be around all acro fruit system. if we manage to get our, in my view, this functional aggregate foot system on a sound, environmental, economics, social and economic basis, then we solved everything else will come from even climate change and these things health issues and our mental issues, social issues, there are collateral, they're all part of the, of this whole thing that is connected and the connect, the connecting, sent a piece is food. and how you produce the because we see the world as it sees.

we are in fact, at the border age of the revolution. because human kind of is able to do it, but how much time that will take? how much? uh, i mean, misery is that will create, i don't know, but that's, i'm for me, you know, very, it's a french writer called pier hobby. he said, this is a collie bri, i fare. so i'm just a little bird in the system doing my job as much like the in europe. we're not going to give off went off and there are lots of other technologies. it's not just about jim or there are lots of other technologies

coming up and the companies are committed to invest in europe as well, despite that, being so uncomfortable as a euphemism to work here. the to hello. we've got some welcome cloud and rain pushing into western parts of canada at the moment. some slick of cloud, just coming through here that should help in tubs, off the wall, 5 and the in terms of the smoke. so we will see some on said weather coming in

across canada over the next style. so rather uncertain whether to enter the big south of the us, texas oklahoma, saying some very heavy storms live, the storms rolling through, soaking wet weather to into the southeast. as we go on uh through the next couple of days, uh, weather will grassy make its way further east was that shade on the west? the weather, the just running right in across the place where the rock is easing. further east was bright, is up nice to close at east the side of the us 19 celsius in new york. we have got some showers that some west to weather said. i would say it was the rockies. i would say it was the west coast, not too bad ally at around 20 degrees celsius with plenty of sunshine, sunshine into the car period as well. but i'm excited for the east and all that at the moment. some showers in place here. they will grasp the we can move out. so the way some waste of weather coming in across that southeast, in front of us down across the bahamas, cuba saying some really heavy showers as we go on 3 1st day. that wasn't making its

way further east. the leading our neighbors most even people far away are so helping with the environment . problems in amazon because their consumers i teach kids about us at our oceans are facing today. i've been working and are just trying to find ways to get this language helped kids. what do we do as and what are you going to do and keep i always just click the link which that keeps the red blood women very, but they have one, several back over there, 5 point one. if you've got them arrogant. the thing say that texting women remains a challenge and the regions will not stop being pro like i want to sleep. we don't have to wait a minute. it's done the things about 2 weeks. now suffice johnny to show something, right?

someone does choice our country and someone's needs to rebuild the russia. so it's kind of helped us in our tele reach of buffalo fighters in belgrade . so states the most serious across the border website, since the ukraine war began the alarm about this in a, this is all 0 life. and also coming up disturbing details emerge of starvation and