and is pouring down from spain into morocco and l. jerry, our usual storms through west africa and also pulses of rain for gap on equitorial guinea. as we looked toward the central african republic and its capital bunkie on sunday. meantime, i think one more calm day for the western cape province before this next weather maker moves in. so for now, cape town, 14 degrees on sunday, that's slightly below where you should be for this time of the year. the, when the news breaks, devices like these, as you can imagine being used. what the way across the front slide when people need to be heard. and the story needs to be told. seed was always very hard for me to find a job because i come from a very poor neighborhood with exclusive interviews and we're back from the heart. and this is our found era has teams on the ground next to bring you more award

winning document trees and life news. the migration to britain is that right could levels this 5 conservative party tonight just to cut a neighbor has criticized the government for failing to do so. so what's behind these immigration policies and what's their impact on people speaking to say in the u. k, this is inside story, the hello and welcome to the program i'm fully by people. immigration is a central theme and british politics with the current conservative government taking a hard line against people seeking to come and stay in the country. one minister has described the u. k as facing an invasion comments widely criticized by rights organizations. government policies include proposals to process, assign them,

seek is applications in wanda, the opposition labor party says it to wants to reduce the number of arrivals, but with different plans. yet, despite the negative political climate numbers release this week, show integration is at record levels. with a net influx of more than 600000 people will be discussing this with, i guess in just a few minutes. but 1st, this report from alexi o'brien on why there's such a political opposition to immigration in britain. the u. k has had a long line of governments which promised to bring down mid migration of this country needs a majority. conservative government, which really aims to get that migration into the 10s of thousands. and that should remain, our impression is really that we want to bring that migration to sustainable levels . what we want to do is bad down on a migration, particularly a skilled workers now and now the government, which pledge to reduce numbers is facing a different reality. last year, so a re,

quote hi, nick, migration of $606000.00, facing a backlash from his own conservative and pays. prime minister richie sooner consisted those numbers will come down. numbers a 200. it's as simple as that, and i want to bring them down. study related fees is accounted for $306000.00 arrivals. the largest source of migration work related fees is sold, the most dramatic increase mostly attributes to feeling shortages in the health care sector. the war and ukraine and badges crack down in hong kong also prompted an optic and humanitarian phase as being issued. but they are the make up one 5th of the total number. experts say several unprecedented world events happening at once having an impact. despite these numbers, burson is facing labor shortages and several crucial effect is partially driven by an exodus. if you nationals of the brakes it the government sets of choices here.

being based on this, on the market, they added stations exit and other parts of the day for me to bring people into what this idea is, we should also at the same time, reduce the overall level of that migration. so fits into this kind of bar. as johnson i, nearby printers here says i need to get or but the u. k. government insists it will cops, nit migration to leave precious on housing and public services. this week it announced new rules bothering most overseas students from bringing the dependence with them. but summer questioning this policy, given the government's desire to economic growth, the way in which the economy is kind of shaping given the recession, we just naturally avoid this. given the highlights, replace them with a given that was losing a lot of the migration following breakfast. i really don't see how the government could really bring down those numbers and keep the economy at a stable level where it's aiming for. but despite sticking to the idea of reducing migration, reminisced as soon as it has for now shied away from commissioning to any specific

numbers, alexia brian, for inside story. while in britain, there's much media and political focus on people arriving on small boats and by irregular roads and figures. release this week, the office for national statistics estimates that's 76000 asylum seekers. arrived in the u. k. last year. but they make up just 12.5 percent of those seeking to stay long term. the as well as spring in august. now all of them are in the united kingdom in london. is krista rotten china, the u. k. chief of mission for the international organization for migration, enroll kingsbury sees a career sheet, the ceo of migrants rights network, a charity that supports migrants in the fight for justice. and also in london, peter gig and editor in chief of up and democracy and independent use website and

best selling author of democracy for sale. and welcome to all of you. thank you for joining us on inside story. chris. uh, let me start with you for 13 years, a tories of promise to cut integration numbers, but you have 600000 more people arriving in the u. k. last year. help us understand these numbers 1st and what are the driving factors behind this increase? yes, it's really important to look at the numbers carefully because a big number can easily be misunderstood. and what we actually see is that most of the increase last year has been caused by a very specific one off events altogether. so it's the one ukraine where people are flight and arrived in the u. k. unrest and hong kong has met meant that some british nationals have come, it was, we've seen a lot of foreign students return off to the pen demik. but equivalent to of the, the, the numbers of, of the 600 over 600 thousands, all actually people who are coming to feel very important skills gaps,

mostly in the health care sector. so what we see from these speakers is that it's most the regular and we'll do the migration which can also be forgotten in the headlines. right? so where does the 600000 figure come from? what can you split it into e u and non e u migration? a lot of it is, is known as you. and what we see is that the assignment, another thing i think that that's quite important to note is that in the last 6 months, the numbers have been actually increased. but the increase that we seeing between the last, really these 6 months ago in this one is that asylum seekers are not also included . and there are actually very small talked about $70000.00 only. so about a quarter of the figure of the 600000 lives is people who are joining through a scale of labor roots move the old on a you internationals. because since breakfast is what we've seen, that it's in the roots, the premium skills labor from across the globe. right. and i do want to come back

to rex it chris and ask you about the changes we've seen since breaks it. but let me come to you face and ask your thoughts about these net migration figures and why there's such political hostility in the u. k towards immigration. um, i kinda wish i could onto that question in terms of why the hosted etc. but i, i would suggest it is probably because it always needs to be a skate going around on the policy side of things. and the k destruction from what is happening at the moment, which is a kind of under resource public services. because the cost of living crisis, we call a $70.00, which is impacting people. i mean, we would say that that migration bigger than the alarming. it's not a concern. we're, we, we should be really please that the you, k is a destination for people who wanted to make it at home once to help it prospect build, you know, build a less skills or, or should i skills with us and just,

but it seems to be a very unhealthy obsession with numbers and it started, as you mentioned, breaks it 8, then moved on to small boat crossings. it's now focusing on international students . and it's just, it's an opportunity fake of everyone. the government tends to focus on on, and it ends up dehumanizing it on the valuing the people. and it talks about people as disposable numbers and commodities rather than individuals who will bring, you know, ben, selves and, and, and all they offer to the case. peter, let me ask you why the government is focusing on this. why make integration such a key issue? when the 2022 figures were in negatively going to be high because of, as a krista mentioned because of reset them and schemes for ukraine and hong kong, for example in somebody's there's a curious thing because you have a government that had previously to the conservative governments just to remind you of you has been in power now and you guys are taking over 13 years at 500 years and

started from kotis. and the last day of the minnesota party, over 10 years ago in the den, british prime minister david cameron said he was going to bring the migration down twice that have tons of times a per year. every successive concert of liter has been quite a number of them since that i'm prime minister has, has kind of research interest safety issues. so knock isn't talking about a talk at he's and talking about a specific number. how do you explain that within someone's what you are talking with internal parts of politics as well? what you have is a home secretary, as one of rockman who's why the scene is very much on the rights to conserve the party as why the scene is one thing which is the next job when for leadership last summer has been very, very strong and very vocal and said things around issues, immigration to frankie, previous home, secretaries of not said she compared uh people coming on, i'm flexible as on site sites, east coast as of and i refugees to an invasion which is the kind of line which we haven't heard in versus politics from a front line politician for a very, very long time. the last time really we've heard language like that was 50 years

ago. you know, pilots and in that instance, you know, power was with sacks from the cabinet. so not a problem is that impulse and quite a lot of this is actually, frankly, to do some of that at least by law, the language around this is to do with internal, internal parts of politics. because all have internal critics of wishing. so you're not going to toys who want them to be tougher on lots of things, including migration and he ends up in his position as you say, well, he's actually trying to move away from numbers because i think he probably realizes the, the numbers game is not a really, it's not a very useful way to consider the issue of migration, but it's not something that's in the gifted of the conservative party at all to bring the figures in the way he's talking down to tens of thousands of people. and he talked about david cameron wanting that migration default to tens of thousands boys, johnson as well. so he about getting the numbers to less than a quarter 1000000. why do you think the success of conservative governments has failed to, to reach that target? the better questions, probably why you did decide to substitute, or if you target from the 1st place, you know, the reason they've know they've not reached is because it's not really possible.

brittany is quite a large country, it's $60000000.00 plus it's an aging population. it requires a lot of skills and requires a lot of skills and migration. it requires also does migration due to types of work that there isn't the labor force. and that hasn't been the kind of policy puts in place that would cut creation and labor force any not taking them to do. so what you have is success and politicians saying they want to do something about a problem. what i think anything about the downstream issues that, that kind of lead to large that binds migration, you know, the wires to shortages all laborers and the same piece of maintenance. but because of a series of, you know, this is a series of good reasons on policy decisions that were never taken. and instead of actually thinking about as of what the cars are part of how students turn it into a political football. okay, interesting, chris, let me come back to you and ask you more about these recent arrivals and where. busy are they fit the critics of the government have long argued that britain needs a steady influx of migrants in order to boost its workforce and support ailing

public services. we. we know, of course, that key sectors like health care, i have chronic shortages, staffing shortages, have the recent arrivals tackled this issue of scale shortages, especially in health care and social care. but let me see really in, in many high income countries is that there is an aging population. so we do need migrant labor to, to fill in some of the skills gaps, but also to make sure that people have to, to work longer. so this is not a huge unique phenomena in the u. k. um, but in the, okay, the like in many other countries all skills gaps i think also looking forward. so we be, we talked about the car in shortages, but many countries looking at the green economy and trying to heat met 0. they will need new skills that they currently don't have. so of course, the countries not doing their best to increase the skills locally in their own population, but there was actually going to be a competition for people who could install heat problem. so console. so in

a solar panels. so i think it's very important. the migration is talks about as in as an essential and very positive thing, and really focusing on the contributions that people make. but i think we also need to recognize some real found. it appears that sometimes is people don't understand the large numbers and the see concerns around services and long waiting times, for example, in, in the health service. so we do need to really talk and explain what's behind the numbers. we need to talk about the contributions that get made, but we need to be able to look at community level. how can we engage with communities to make sure that my friends can integrate better? uh, let me uh, bring bring face and ask you about this figure. is that because you work directly with the, you know, people in the refugee community for example, how is this negative discourse around immigration impacting them and you know, how, how is it? is it more difficult today for them to, to settle it?

and it's incredibly difficult for them to see, and the tires are very welcoming country. and you know, when we talk about who is welcome in this country we've seen obviously and brilliant and right. and they say for it's created for ukraine and to create to said for it's for hong kong to but we haven't created to say fruits for any other nationality being even i scanned, you know, in terms of the rest resettlement stevens have been really pulling used in excessive overall a many of them. so really we need to on pick who is welcome to the okay. and it does look like you know that people from the georgia country don't welcome people from black and brown backgrounds on welcome. and so they feel incredibly isolated to the even incredibly dehumanized, that conversations are happening about them with out of the and austin and why they flipped, they know of getting them, you know, what would,

why did you have to take this journey of, of a, you know, put your life at risk, it a small part would have been back to um, options for you. um, what they usually intend to say to us is we would have loved us getting like the ukrainians games where we would give them an option. the ability to comes to the okay, so there's an element of crazy. so in this you would say the absolutely absolutely respectful gauge pressure ga system. if we think about saddam right now where there was a civil hole happening again, we have not created those safe ways for sydney. so i for usually what i'm doing is behind this visit. let me ask you about who is behind this dehumanization that you've talked about? is it the politicians? is it the media? what's behind it? what's viewing this? i think it's a combination of, i mean, you know, we've already a lead you to language that that are covered in the home secretary his use. but also prior to about, we've had all the homes, equities, preaching stuff, also use the human, i think language as well. and we've had a success as number of,

i'm secretaries that i've always made integration like so the full point of that issue. so too is it may create some cost on environment policies of focusing on documenting migrant. and then you have a successive home sex choice. you just ramp up the, the rector, it, and we have, we do, we have a medium as well who, who, whose hand is and, and support. and we've got, you know, media influences who been able to kind of, you know, jump hooks up arkansas, which it stopped me. lead to is things like the far right, you know, protesting outside hotels and intimidating refugees. so it's a combination of things that i think they help each other, you know, they the range here in terms of how it speaks about my foot to the way to politicians. so it's a, it's, it's a positive relationship for them. and their way, one thing i did want to add in terms of why the, the, there's like when she say that might not be looking at figures, wallace, obviously it's achievable. but also the issue here is about big business needing

labor. so they talking about labor shortages, and you do have the business that says no b a and in college and the government to make migration, it's much more accessible to the set to. so you have this competing of the competition between the different sectors. we want it to more and so i think that's also a part of the whole, this kind of landscape is that you've got big business so, so it go to best interest. so it's a game of the government, the government talking tough on integration, but also taking advantage of the benefits, right? you get from the significant numbers of peter. let me come to you and ask you about, you know, a fish. i mentioned the far right and of course we all know about the find, right. and nigel, for raj and, and you know, we talked about the conservatives. it's, but it's not just the tories now. is it even labor is not necessarily progressive when it comes to immigration? what, why do they feel? why does maybe feel that they need to be on the same ground as a conservative?

i think it's, you know, what you're looking at. labor is constantly in somebody's fights and the last 4 and the labor party is very aware of that in 2019, at the lowest lot of seats and traditional areas. what became known as the right will, which is a kind of lease term for a lot of more associated probably from a working class eats a traditional post industrial states which a bit like in america, parts of the midwest of america would have long voltage democrats in the u. k. along both of labor. a number of them isn't of the same way that in america have turned republican, had turned concert and started voting for conservative party. so neighbors, very aware of those seats is of the view which is not always backed up by pointing to be honest. the people in the states are more concerned during the migration. they are aware that a lot of people hold for breakfast and immigration was a big issue into breakfast debate. and what's interesting, what do you take is immigration was such a big pop point, the hot button topic, 200 bucks the referendum in the year. subsequently, afterwards, it actually became less savings and the political discourse in some respects and britain. but now it's really massively reappeared on the labor parties. very

worried about being outlined to minutes use have been solved immigration. and it's kind of been somebody that a piece of where the labor party is at the moment that there's not a lot of business. and despite the fact that they're bringing far ahead in the polls, that doesn't seem to get out of policy confidence in the labor party about articulation . what might be seen as progressive values. so there is somebody said the price of no, there's no pay apply. and then from library that no labors position problem is that they would keep with the same system that the current example would quote, unquote do them better. and so they will give us about how the home office runs, the various, rightly so a lot of the situations in microns we put in and method usually takes 100 k, r a politics label to purchase all these those heavily. when it comes with they actually change the substance of those policies. no. okay, uh, kristen, let me ask you prime minister. so like i said, he's considering a range of options to help tackle of numbers of legal. busy migration and bring those numbers down, he said, and the u. k said it's going to be restricting student v several. we've talked

about this a bit before in 2024. let me take the ability of international students to sponsor family members. do think such measures? will actually help bring the numbers down or is just just rhetoric. what i would say is the, um, an international organization that advises member states in how to make migration policy that benefits everyone. so the member states, the migraines, and also the sending countries all of my clients. we would say that the overall, it's really good to take a very broad view of policies to make sure that they're all aligned with each other . and that they, they make sense. and the reinforce each other. so for us, we would say that it's very important to look at the contributions that people make . students make very good contributions and be we know that the country bits over 40000000000 to the u. k. economy. and more broadly, we know that uh, working age migrants, they bring a lot to the economy so they normally contribute 3 times more than what the

government spends on them. but i think these old is sometimes can be quite difficult policy choices to make when there is a political landscape. so i think what we would advise as the un migration agency is to look really at all new policies and it right evidence based way. so that the best way for what can be decided that really meets the u. k. 's needs, but also protects my brands and supports countries also origin. all right. phase this obviously, as we said, a very politically and racially charged discussion around migration in a country which for a long time it has to be said was seen as progressive in terms of race relations, right? for the public today in the u. k. illegal and legal migration it seems, is viewed, you know, as together and they want to see the numbers come down. so how then, you know, for someone like you works in this field, how do you change this mindset?

it's not easy, especially when you have politicians and a government that's very set on talking about people in terms of need galaxy. and we don't use the language of any goals that could states creates, need the labels that kind of states us as we speak, talk about people, we talk about people who have operations and aspirations and you know what they, what they want to achieve when they get here, but the fact that they want safety is about telling that human story. i think what we don't want to do, what we don't do it was mike was right. it's not what is talk about people in terms of contribution because we don't want that acceptance to be based on what they can bring to the u. k. in terms of economic value or skills. we know that people, especially if they've been on the, if they've been prosecuted in the blood and you know, face to murder on that. johnny, we should not be expect to meditate immediately, be kind of a, what cost and therefore be their doctors. and by the way,

you have this conversation today, how do you have a genuinely informed conversation in the u. k. and debate about integration? i think you are the, you have to bring the michael, it's themselves and the refugees themselves and austin to share their stories about what they, why they came to the. okay. well, i had a smoke that i'm patients where it, as i said, and i think through those stories, they will come next to people and say, well those but say about aspirations and impressions i have for myself. and for my general, if you in a future generations. so it's about humanizing, it is taking away from numbers and telling the, you know, the backgrounds of, um, people, i think it so sorry about as educating people about colonialism as you know, imperialism those centuries and legacies. that have created uh, you know, um you know, migration rates. um why the u. k. is this the point for a lot of people to come through?

okay. peter, let me come to you. uh, the conservatives, as we said, continue to beat this drum even when the record on migration is not really great. how do you see this playing out in the next election? is this going to be a big issue? it's, it's very likely it will be from a couple of angles. as you mentioned, the labor party has decided to stay kind of similar grounds to the concern of the party. so this doesn't happen, which i wouldn't be surprised. the labor party were to choose to conserve is up being being we called migration and labor parts of utah far. so that's the kind of politic to the last to the conservative party to the rice, the conservative party. there are frames kind of popular as parties that are very, very on to migration that made on to immigration. it's kind of a big trying to their policies as the parties like the reform party, which is kind of like the new version of the brackets of parts without knowing jeffreies today exist, they will make noise as well. and so when a problem understood impulse, she is still the home secretary, if she's in post the next election or even if she isn't, she would renew. she would love to be the next leader concerned. the park is gonna be a little dikes about that. she gave

a speech of this national concert or conference in london earlier this week in which she, in many ways criticized heavily her own government from the right. so with her impulse, the likelihood of the issue of immigration and particularly this issue of small boats, which takes up a lot of media oxygen for such a small number of people that it features very heavily in the right wing price in britain and the media debates around immigration, britain does every time, so that will continue. unfortunately, especially as we see more new, we've got new television stations in the you k which are rice of politics as well. so it looks as if the kind of the, the ecosystem for this is very much alive and would probably continue. all right, chris, i'll come to you for the final word. how does britain solve it? integrate should dilemma, and should they even try to solve this? well, i think migration is a, is a fact of life. so it has always been, it is absolutely critical. but the countries shouldn't manage it in a way that everyone can benefit of the migrants are at the center of the right. so

respected that the receiving government benefits and also the country for regions so that the resources don't get drained. but i would say what we really need is an evidence based debate. one, where we really look beyond the emotions. we look beyond the numbers, we recognize people's fears, but we can see that the british public actually news this isn't understands they sent a lot of the. the recent polling shows that people feel quite positive. you mean about immigration and do so every hmo and it's very much a trend. we seen other european countries that people feel positive, they understand the positive contributions. so we really need to make sure that we keep that in mind and have a very positive outlook around migration, managing it. well we've, we've really home is the benefits and that we reduce me to get a to some of the challenges. thank you. thanks all 3 of you for a great discussion, chris, step, vault 10, china physical ratio and be the gig. and thank you very much for joining us on

inside story and thank you to for watching. you can always watches program again, any time by visiting our website that ologist the or dot com for further discussion . go to our facebook page at facebook dot com, forward slash a inside story. and of course you can join the conversation on twitter. i handle these as a j inside story for me, for the back to going whole team here in doha, thanks for watching. the the voters interfere turned out in large numbers for a presidential election to produce no clear winners. as presidents are drawn and

challenger coasted on the go, have to have in over on, on may 28th will succeed in a final post for the prices of the stories as agreed on. i'll just say a man who domain a to the reality politics throw the 30 year colleges 0 will tells the extraordinary story of nobody else who suffice exile of the death of 2 king a day. while the king was reading through the 1st to a switch where it was tonight, who was prime minister 14 times until he's lucky eventually run out. the rocky power broke on how to 0 to approve or reject the most progressive constitution ever proposed for any nation. and there's 3, yes or no. voted no. the big picture us was a question that goes into the very foundation of judy until the cause of its

relationship with indigenous people. the muscle and the midst of 2 parts, one on the jersey is the conflict into time continued some correspondence or on the ground to record every angle. if the story has been ongoing between the hours and the switch. these are me like pages to say that a 100 i'm soothing is refugees. why you have to be registered under what kind of access this this food does not get to where it is needed, so it may not get there. and all the challenge ahead is your stay without just the rest of the business development. what's most important to me is talking to people, understanding what they're going through here. it just here to we believe everyone has a story. we're hearing the

.