is being that, it's just a dream to the background part, that was a nightmare such a nightmare and a dream come together. i think the dream has overtaken the night by the i mother insight and o ha. he had told stories on out 0, american activist has been killed off to being self in the head. fight is riley soldiers in the occupied westbank. 26 year old i should, nor, as gave was taken talents in a protest against the expands. and if a legal is really supplements near the town of beta south of numbers as rules, all ne says is looking into the incident robust tablet as the british human rights activists working in the occupied westbank, he witnessed the killing. i should newer as the service present when i

actually already knew was most by the is ready to minister. i want to stop by immediately refusing the is riley on the statement that they were firing towards somebody who was presenting home to them. they sided a crowd, 200 maces away from them down the road. they slide for the vantage point. a sniper size from a building. thanks 5, a one or 2 shots and i know targets and markets. uh sure noise. um. as a human rights volunteers working with the international solidarity movement in the west bank. uh myself, i should note and uh, and other international volunteers join the peaceful price session at bates or near the city of annapolis at the behest of local palestinians. as this is a regular price session and its routinely attacks times repressed by the is right. another sorry, indeed, the 2nd tune, palestinians up in march. it's uh,

based on uh, in the last 2 years. as good as death came on the days, riley forces withdrew from jeanine off the 10 day ministry operation. thousands took part in funeral possessions on friday for 21 palestinians killed by. is there any soldiers in the city that he 9 were killed across the entire occupied westbank during the offensive march of jeanine's infrastructure? it was significantly damaged in garza israel has targeted refugee camps and homes across the strip. these 8 people have been killed. 15 wounded in an attack on a school housing displaced people in jamalia, just north of gauze, the city. and now the strike west of gauze and said he killed several palestinians, including children. 5 people died when a home was hit in the own deserts, refugee camp in central gulf, or at least 70 school children remain on accounted for in kenya. off the dormitory

5, it killed at least 18 students. it happened in the erie county. news of the capitol nairobi people investigate police are investigating what caused the fire government has declared 3 days of morning. donald trump sentencing and his house money trial has been placed by an until often november's presidential election. he was convicted in may on 34 accounts of falsifying business records from pond coming up . payments to an adult film style stormy daniels sentencing. how to originally been shuttled for september. the 18th manhattan d. a which went against the me has been postponed because everyone realizes that there was no case because i did nothing wrong or to which i did say, and attacked by my political opponents in washington, dc, and comrade, kamala harris and radical left opponents for purposes of

election it appears as though that was in the case that you would have never been brought to sleep until i fear. and yankee has made land full in china is hang on provence. the winds reach speeds of up to 230 full columbus has an alas. as a full 100000 people have been forced to evacuate the whole homes due to the sol. boeing's trouble stalling on a spacecraft is on its way back to us often leaving the international space station without its crew the style line a cap. so we'll conclude it's highly publicized nearly 3 months. stay in space in just a few hours because of technical issues with the croft it's test pilots. let's wait another 5 or 6 months to make their own way. again, it is your headlines. you're up to date. the the,

[000:00:00;00] the really, the new world with the industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put

the products on the market. we need a regulation, so we don't do crazy things because maybe sometimes we do credit things. i don't know. but, except that we have regulation, we once we good ation as industry and if we don't behave then yes, penalty, that's fine. the always case of the industry makes money. of course it does. if the industry does not make money, how many people will be on work, the worst sort of the last concern, the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedence. corporate interest, corporate profits had been getting priority with the regulator, so that needs to change. and one of the big ways to do that is just to require transparency we, we locked transparency. we would like to publish everything we use it's just not

allowed. and we use this, i cannot say we don't care, there's intellect, property rights, but we, if so we publish everything. it would just be breaking the law, the a, prefer intellectual property to the house of children. the if you make money out of selling pesticides, how much incentive does these companies do? these companies have to get us off pesticides, who they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or who they make sure that we use always more pesticides. the today industry pieces to spend millions of euro's not being to do this. it reduces the state of researching

substitutes and how to make these things different. the, it's in the industries an interest to bring food, to the tables that it's safe, that it's high quality that is reasonably priced so that you and i, and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good, nutritious food every day. as a reasonable price, the progress and goals risk you are referring to, to accidents, you just really into that. and so i see that. and so people who are injured or who people die every time just happens for industry in general defeats however, those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to progress. and there is no progress without an

analysis of risk versus benefits. the where these progress is progress, moving forwards, whatever, and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful that it's good for, for the people we receive, put some intelligence on what technology and what progresses. i don't think that progress is viewed in the future. generations house by using tons of chemicals that, that, that can create disease and he's cancer to, to someone who's 20 years old. that's not the, the,

the, if we went today was a progression, your principal problem. you will not have openings, and these will not exist because everything, sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 5060000 people die with the accidents. so progression, reprints the point i think is a disaster. and it just seems, once we all know one more advocating and you applies these 200 culture.

we are farming in europe with less substances than most americans. most americans use this tools, you know, seats, because we don't use g m o, 's. we don't use technology. i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not the and in europe, we have this romantic idea or formulas business people. they would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need fittest business people and we shouldn't that them to the business the

and we can't expect them to us in any other way except as business the only way that would change is if there is a, a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat like a global commodity, we have a very big problem. the and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder. and the highest bid or may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bid, or maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food,

the will be some disease all about making money. making profit. and some of the big corporations it's about any form of the big uniform lens with one called maximum. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also economically, it's about international markets import export. it's all about companies controlling in far away places, lands. great sport, commodities. there's another box for production is not about feeding people. the industrial agriculture is

a form of mining and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses at the most of the use go into animal food and text us 5, a fuel, whatever. you have the, the rest of it can be sold more expensive to some other use will go into process in food processing the so it's foot a necessity. always food, a business transaction. food as both. yeah. so we all need to eat. that's for sure . but in europe, we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in uniform, severe, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one to

a month to another month. so we have 10 to you. doesn't really matter to us if we have a tmo tomorrow. and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food, no a days. this is the big confusion between which is a genuine interest in the interest of industry. because the priorities drops and growth and it states growth at jobs are more important than people's nights. the, the, if the food industry is successful, will create more jobs, will create more value added, it will create more for so i don't see why we shouldn't also fight for the interest of the industry, but this should be a communal fights. a

modern hybrid culture relies on satellites relies on precision farming, which is the connection between centralized digital machinery and then all of the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as pre production in agriculture because of an overly conservative restrictive regulation. and these tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what under the i think your opposite is the best potential to be the leading agricultural region in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs,

and the most invested in seeds in uh, hybridization, genetically expressed besides, gave me calls machinery. we shouldn't be, because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to which much what we want to see is something very different as a model built on diversity. on biological diversity, that is, you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations, do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfiguration together? how we operate on this planet? well, we will make also subsidies the that's defined and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they

have to be then assistant to our goals. well, many people, if i say that would say yes, yes, of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through a technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment are now foot system that operates was in the planetary boundaries. as scientists, i've been to find you where i respect the rules of the planet and not vice versa, that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms what progress do we want?

are we willing to trade off some of the benefits for some of the risk because we're facing a world which is more and more globalized? so we are up against the other parts of the world, which do not always play with the same rules. the, there are geo political issues in the past of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the was either to 8 or to producing it themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land. because we found use more land. ecology is more resources

the c one cities or the moment. you simply that come in, they sort of must have a lovely yes accumulate going on. we come into it seem to be side. me list the toner last. the plug issue, this guy. know collateral game for the one of them be in dollars. you may be the, do you imagine the number of, from the diseases that are in every family today is not due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all breast cancer. once that's not

true. so it is due to an environment and to probably poisons that top numbers. what all the chronic bodies is designed to be toxic initially and spread all over the place 1st to start the yes it did to share that because as my my the i'm credit does he think that you're trying you'll continue enough to bundle mama can you can see, have you anything else for me? the cool, no flip side of my t o. s will credit it, take you to the sign you up to. we didn't go to the momma you from. i told you me to stop equal, you know, mean i'm a total of my vehicle so they take it easy enough to understand either the volume,

this is the best to go see on. so it looks it goes so totally okay. maybe i'm good, the boot, the boot, the, they don't know, go make demos in there. are they usually i like this to be a part of my say with the game this the guess over the less governor of the less than that i'm is we're getting right now. we'll see why. usually 50 located again out of the nato. the to the i don't do because of it. click on this, which does just skip with any of this is joe bitten menu. us the locate called layer of a speed, a baby. don't this yet waste a total of interest to control moines. focus that stuff. yes. by sense control list, decision, toxic us, but a lot of approval pre owned by the system, all of them. oh no,

no gun city finish the 2nd non piece of suspect. just use the separately within by subject on us from the know the se in north canada she didn't know to put on your leave. we did must be motor. she'll she'll to you if you have, we'll give you a minute or 2. how stupid under the last few months to kinda loop in a brute to see if he's wanting you to might be think i'll shoot it to inform you until you meet. we'll tell you if you don't see a scene football soon cuz he cannot still continue. but i won't because he will see to it, but on a few that getting into month to get on the team, go get for a while. i mean, come for them to come in. well, come morning and must meet with the inside of us, giving it to mother to we sent over to you and my new product,

and we still have them later learn some of us with the document tomorrow. no, it's on the in coca most cafe, but don't seem to be on board kaloni plus 40. i gave it to us. as in the me to double. she's in give me a buzz back and forth. don't seem to be the wallet. you'd have to think. okay, and do you know if there's a noise like to the media? no. forget about the to the uh for the title and sort of see the of my daughter. she's a thin plastic girl, my normal c though the law and what i see only in the south end, they've conflict. a lot of those go not law say that the for the real model. see of, you know, the ma'am indeed many,

it was the openings to modern agriculture have understood that it's and it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to and to use fear as a strong, an emotional driver for it, and changing policy and for influencing policy. sometimes it's in the interest of the industry groups to do the ass, of course, because it keeps them at work brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes have visits from them. recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and threw me in your and threatening classroom stuff. hospice but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fights, he gets when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that and we have bows and arrows and they have different bonds. as soon as there's an end,

your group of people who are again something maybe, maybe the advantage, maybe they stop using it, maybe they sell them 14. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has the truth. we know what's in our products, for example like that. if i, if i make a product mean you can go home. this evening and make it by a, in your kitchen. you know what's in there and you write it down. that is the truth . sorry, but to know we are an industry, we know what we pushing our products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we push them in our products. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about and i'm not talking about philosophically the truth. i'm talking about what we do,

we know what we do. and we can talk about that the on the to know there's a cover, you don't, the domains do the video. assume that they face or less something, the 50 seed, these are jam, they put it on and then i have read the book to please understand. then they push what i'm into, see it back to normal acre. uh, and these are house for the if you demo the, these are the guys show me and these are the citizens to, you know, for example, the schedule, see for $0.50 a month from now school. they don't on a glass when that was what was on the violence and that was putting on, doing visual, still under the see most i thought you should have this you may or was it shows you plenty or the coffee you don't see it? no, no. our quotes re coffee down here, it does it for several or something. coffee,

they'll send for me with his shots. if he pull over the 3rd party consumer, apple to solve for cook and it could pass on, i live saw where they have the hour for zones on those probably done. these are some east coast precision orders, i think for me. so i did have a probably most onto the hodge. i mean to be it's around that no scope piece. i think that the new thing you have on his government with these says 5 digit, you say getting russell, a thought provoking. odd since the e you made weapons being used in gaza? no doubt. it should be used in an offensive way. that's how i could use the spacing

realities you're running. mean, what does he bring to the table? hard from being presidential? could we go to some we cannot take the effective use of the present as not any important effective. he had the story on talk to how does era. ready too often of kind of style and it's put tray through the prism of war. but there were many of the kind of stuff thanks to the braves, individuals who risk their lives to protect it from destruction. an extraordinary film archives funding for decades reviews the forgotten food of the country's mode in history. the forbidden real part 3, the rise of the missionary dean on us just either of

the i money side in the top stories own out is there. an american activist has been killed off to being shots and the head binds ready soldiers. and the okey pod, westbank 26 year old i should, nor as gate was taking positive protest against the expansion of illegal. is there any supplements near the time of beta sounds of numbers as well as all me says it's looking into the incident. us like jim's day asked me blank and says he's been

briefed and wants to find out more information as to how it unfolded. we deplore this tragic loss. now the most important thing to do is to gather the facts and that's exactly what we're in the process of doing. and we are intentionally focused on getting those backs and any actions that we take or driven by the fact. so 1st things 1st, let's find out exactly what happened in gaza. israel has targeted refugee camps and homes across the strip. at least 8 people have been killed. 15 wounded in an attack on the school housing displaced people in devonte, a just north of gauze, assess e or another, strike west of goals and says he killed several palestinians, including children. and 5 people died when a home was hit in the out. and is there it's refuge account and central garza

the 70 school children remain on the accounts and for in kenya, off to a dormitory fire that killed at least 18 students and happened in gary county, north of the capitol, nairobi, police are investigating what caused the fine government has declared 3 days of morning donald trump sentencing in his hush money trial has been postponed until often november's presidential election. he was convicted inmate on especially for accounts of falsifying business records. trump have covered the payments to an adult film status. stormy daniels, the judge said the decision was to avoid any appearance that could affect the election. sentencing had originally been shuttled for september, the 18th. okay, those are headlines. these continues here now to sierra officer, the price of progress. stay with us.

the that is that companies have to submit studies to european commission. they do the studies themselves. uh they have to submit it to the european commission and to esa, so they are paying from safety authority and they have a panel of experts that looks at the studies and then they say, okay, safe or not. uh so what do we have found is that within the expert panel, she has a lot of people with dice with the food industry. so that means the conflict of interest,

the so if someone wants to also replace the products in your let's say a plan for protection product. this person, the because this person or this company, the applicant, has to provide data that allows us, as the risk, assesses to judge whether this product is safe or not. and this information comes from the applicant and the studies that are commissioned by the applicant to allow us to assess the safety piece by the applicant, obviously. so it's the intellectual property of the applicants. and we can property each box of these studies in the car, in the legal framework. but we also have to respect the pieces confidentiality claims of the applicants. so there is a balance to be found between transparency as much as possible, but also to protect the,

the investment of companies in 2 of the product innovations. exactly like in the middle ages, you were asking for the priest, what is the truth in? no, you ask to these scientists and regulatory agencies, what is the truth and they act in the same manner as magician? you know, because they work on secrets can phones, we see chris effects. they say that you cannot to blush that however they say they have the truth. the if you spend i sewage amount of money doing study a study on something where there's a lot of confidential information that you don't want. another company to copy paste. of course not. i mean, you might have spent years a lot of resources. so people time

a lot of time and money on doing this research at what exit does is it on our lives as long as i should publish the results. so it will publish and it will come out with the statement at the end and, and it will publish the results, but it will publish all the details of what a lot of people want to see. because there are people for the, for the relative size of because so it's actually a lot of people, but some people and i want to see everything. that's fine. i think now it's actually a little bit published, but you're talking about several thousands of pages. i didn't know who in his white mind would sit down and read through all of those pages. i think some parts can be blacked up, but i would insist that that's to do with privacy. so the relationship between all companies and research institutes and universities is quite strong. and as i mentioned before, and many parts of the world, it tends to be the public sector developing the products. thanks to relationship with the company. maybe the company donated the technology. the problem in europe,

for example, is that an s, so that you mentioned before, they have scientists assessing the products. and the scientists have a obligation to have no conflict of interest. that means they have to have, have no relationship whatsoever with industry ever. so if you're a scientist and you're having a, any kind of dealing with a company close as a number of avenues of work later. so again, we are really champions and creating difficulties for ourselves in europe, but the rest of the world is doing fine. the running around or jo hollingsworth for monsanto. and with me is my partner, eric lasker, and to on his right is john caleb. and next to john is maybe line right in

the thank you very much know your colleagues to the 2nd final which will look at the transparency and use of scientific studies and the assessment of life for state in the united states. and the hopefully will provide insight into the so called most of the papers. thank you very much for inviting me to be here today as a journalist for some 30 years now. i'm someone who has spent most of my life focusing on facts pursuing the truth. i've spent roughly 20 of those 30 years delving into the dealings of monsanto. and i can confidently tell you that the

story of the company's top sewing chemical glasses say is not one of truth, but one of defeat. it's sort of a treasure trove and look inside a very big and powerful company that has been very secretive, you know, for decades. and a lot of the information is quite alarming. when it comes to public health and safety associated with the use of their popular product life and state and around it. another way in which montana has manipulated regulators and the public is by establishing networks of scientists around the world to support its agenda. and it's message about the safety of this chemical, monsanto, and, or the monsanto back let's, as a task force, pays them the lobby regulators. they author papers, essentially, to push this message that the chemical is safe. there are many individuals and there are many types of different relationships that we've seen in these documents . you can see here that professor david kirkwood is one such paid, expert montana, was relied on

the 2012 months and was very worried about gino toxicity questions arising from 5 to 6 research. when it engaged person, monsanto needed someone to help counter these concerns that were for assisting what bill hayden's wrote in the email, i think i was just not eve. and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision. we all have decades of experience in the industry, and therefore we have reputations to maintain. and that means that there is no point in those being all responding to the influence of, of one stakeholder over another. because those reputations wouldn't be destroyed. i

can say absolutely an attempt to go like categorically this paper was not ghost written. we all inputs our own sections to the paper. there was no input involvement or influence of the review by monsanto. i think you, well, it seems a pair of them on central actually fears. real independent, authentic science. monsanto said itself, it feared the arc review when it found in in 2014. this is for eric, sat down before the classification. monsanto says it fears this. it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability and epidemiology toxicology geno talks. most center officials even predicted the glass, the state would warrant a possible or probable rating. with respect to f, as in echo you know, f as a process is defined as a peer review, and i understand that and that's, i don't have a problem with that peer review problem in this case is that's not, was,

was done. nobody went back and verified the findings on the original studies. and by failing to verify those findings, it cascaded through the entire review process, such that you don't have the answer which is based on the best science hudson's of the say important to me some that we have doing the proper independent assessment. and that the according we the results of the be happy nessa, according to the regulations that focus on the use of the active assessments. and based on that we generate the risk assessments regarding the independence from industry is clearing the legislation. i would say the 6 is the basic principle, the company that the once the market, something the you must pay for the assessment. so this studies happened that the buttons to the result of the current process is scientifically floyd. it is time to have an independent panel of scientist evaluate the way in which the science is reviewed. there's a need for the regulatory agencies to re analyze the data, and there's

a need to publicly publicly release all of the analyses and data to improve the transparency of this process. these are not the actions of a company that has nothing to hide. this is not how you promote a product. this is that's actually proven safe. this is how you whitewash unfortunate and unprofitable facts. this is not by accident, but by design, and it serves monsanto very well, but it does not seem that it serves the public interest. thank you. the monsanto prepared certain documents for the registration and the actual report, if you look at it, has taken directly certain language from the monsanto documents and just placed it in the us a report. so there's a lot of concern about whether f so really did an independent analysis or whether they just took the position to be against i or at monsanto's request. so that is not an independent assessment. how can we verify or expect that on the basis of

such robust scions and i'm quoting industry, we can make a decision. politicians in the end, you can make a decision to protect the people that if somebody you know has said hello to the industry at some stage in his life, that should not mean that that particular scientist should be banned from a panel or research has been funded somewhere by someone, many of the scientists that have longer than half now left the organization and their science panels because they have been accused of having worked with the industry. but since when does that make a science has dishonest? the why? so having worked with the industry some years ago on the small projects, at some stage i did, i'm a scientist by training. and when i was in university, of course i was looking for a grant to do my research. because some research can cost

a lot of money. i was helped by industry. i haven't spoken to that particular industry now for for many, many years. it's been a long time since i was in college. but that doesn't mean i'm dishonest. as a scientist. the know you're extends to be in the region where influence is very high and other regions will get to europe for it for regulation. and that's why it's so important that you're at the keeps regulation which is scientific, which is database. and which as much as possible,

decides results being influenced by, by i would say by noise or by just the emotions and fear the with science meets values. and it's becoming complicated as we come with the science with evidence we do and as a scientific process of risk assessment. but then this evidence is given on another stage on the policy levels. they are believes emotions, values come in. and what we see is a 40 additions don't like the outcome of risk assessment. they don't question therapy, leave the question, the validity of the process. so basically if it's a comes with an opinion,

let's say you may only continuing its in 60 sites. the politicians, the love i've so they want the food have so you are protecting the bees, you're doing the right thing. really good to act on that. so we all applaud to you and it's the same process with the same people. what is the same scrutiny? comes with the conclusion, let's say i'm glad for say, people say, i'm sorry, i don't like these off come. so she would not say the tie for say this relative pretty safe. so if so must be corrupt. i find this very bizarre, you know, regulations is independent of corporate influence and, and it's everything is tested actually tested and with a lot of money and, and, and, and our authorities are looking at it independently. i don't know where these

people have been living even in some of the mainstream, john is you don't find reports that clearly explained that this is not happening. we are seeing corporate capture not only in the sciences it sciences is one of the fields we see corporate capturing in every walk of life. the . i'd like to say it seems to be very highly charged. not because of the safety of dr. per se, but because of g and because of one song though, because of international trade, maybe even because of inequality, with global traits. few facades, assessments itemized. i guess it's the mazda for positive 50 feet, then you facade, supposed to, out, and put in at opa. then yeah,

and medium box models wednesday for those to detect direct and solution to that in people. soft support. business districts really awesome thought fill out the of course, if the science is works for the company, that's a different story. but i think we need to be a little bit more realistic about what it is we want. do we want the best scientists to assess the products to get to make sure they're safe? or do we want to make sure there's no conflict of interest? what does the objective is of the safety of the product? because of the conflict of interest of the, of the scientist. i think we need to be a bit more honest and trustworthy without forwarding into the mistake so. so that's not something that we have a few for that. um the, the,

the experts we use are as independent as possible. but i think also here, it's not black or white. it's not c or, or one that's not the digital binary approach. we have to find the right balance between the best expertise between people that have done research, the people that are with both the feet in, in the scientific endeavor. and on the other hand, to make sure that there is no conflict of interest. and if i may say or something, i think europe needs to make a decision whether we know i think i stop here. yes. that's what leads to far too much, but they don't subscribe to the impulse. she'll get the seat of it. then in this, on this kind of a 100 going to us already. so i see on this to the new business,

the left america soonest attempt to take a set that all the 100 of funding for we and last or kind of stuff. you know, once he left that i live in atlanta, so need to look into this one. that's good. that'll help us improve a little say less, but i it's really a local machine out of band and put them in total bill. yeah. the contracts, all that i can see that that's one that's good for the son and he had enough is that that list, but if we is kind of thing that the company that the so yes, precautionary principle is and di, scientific entities. i think it's a big issue for you, okay. and economy in general because it reduces the income is the willingness of some investment the there is

a risk in registering a new purchase. so this is a risk. this is a benefits. i'm a waiting to take this risk. yes or no. and the regulation today gives us an answer . if you look at the car of today, it is much safer than the car yesterday. you know, the 1st car that i drove in when i was a boy and my father was driving, had no safety built in the house. no, i had no airbag and underway be yes and uh, and its z accommodates. it was not a murder. it is a car was like this and it was a very safe car for the time. and i'm not saying that the best he says of 1950. uh you know where? fantastic. but by then they were very with bessy side. and then we'll just go over the house on the side effects and then the regulation. evils and regression becomes more demanding and especially sides of bond or are withdrawn from the company. and that's no more that's normal. it will ition of any industry,

the power of innovation doesn't come from the big companies. the big companies are too big to be innovative anymore. they just want to preserve that present that just, but they're not innovating anymore. all right, look at, look at the the, the d m and the pesticides were dealing with gm plants that were develop 30 years ago. nothing has changed, its be notified resistance since the beginning it's old chemicals or so. the integration in the innovation is that we now have in addition to round the ready and roundup resist implants, we have become a resistant plans m to, for the resistant place. so we're getting an even more cock to talk to the cocktail, even though that's innovation. it has to get out. it just has to get benefits versus risk, right? what is a risk you're willing to accept on the environment?

even if it's very small, in order to have a safe and affordable to supply the, to me, the defining factor in the future will also be around all acro fruit system. if we manage to get our, in my view, this functional aguilar foot system on the sound, environmental economics, social and economic basis, then we solve everything else. we come from, even climate change and these things health issues and our mental issues, social issues are collateral. they're all part of the, of this whole thing that is connected and the connect, the connecting, sent a piece is food. and how you produce the

because we see the world as it sees we are in fact, at the border age of the revolution. because human kind of is able to do that, how much time that will take, how much i mean misery is that will create i don't know, but that's i'm for me. you know, very, it's a french writer co pay a hobby. he said, this is a collie bri, i fair. so i'm just a little bird into the system. doing my job as much as i news in europe. we're not going to give off went off and there are lots of other

technologies. it's not just about gym, or there are lots of other technologies coming off and the companies are committed to invest in europe as well. despite that, being so uncomfortable is a euphemism to work here. the, the latest news as it breaks, since the 1979 is evolution. c. one has been unable to buy a new west and they have craft because of international sections with detailed coverage more than 50000 homes. and several villages have either been damaged or destroyed since june, when the rains began from around the world. it's a mazda of how close the space, especially the traditional reform, is with as much as i think most thing died for the president's delivering. who stays the nice and address the dentist on the bodies of those on the fringes of

society, increasingly belonging to margaret's watch, the shores forensic anthropologist takes a campaign for the dignity of the deceased for the right to closure for the living to the european parliament. every friend particular to the thousands of migrant bodies, buried with 7 name in european cemeteries, fuel or unknown. witness documentary on the jersey. hello, we do still have plenty of fee to the full cost across north america. i've got plenty of showers to into the big south just around the gulf coast is not the area of low pressure may well develop into a tropical system. so that's one to keep an eye on it. so you have a shells, the west to where the cloud just stretches its way across the south. east bit of a marietta front since the central air is but not too much on them. i would towards the west. that's where looking at some exceptional weather here. life 38 degrees celsius,

a good time degree is also about the average 27 in seattle and warm enough to in calgary at around 31 degrees. still a few showers there across the south and pots that just pushing out of louisiana into mississippi and a few showers just clinging onto the mid atlantic states of these disabled. and so waste and parts of canada, but continues to drift a little further east, which as we go through west sunday, kind of that does stay a little unsettled into the waste in areas southeast in palm. so the us to pretty unsettled my life. anything i've taught was still by this stage. so i'm trying to show i was me mot across the car being as per usual, i think the weather's weather will be in to central america. quite a nasty lot of storms, just ganging up. i'll see you east coast of mexico and that could cause some blow twice starting this week. the of inequality corruption, refreshment,

and rain in it just decided to cost the piece of cake. i'm sure it's a documentary explores the desperate states of democracy and 11 through the eyes of those who are losing hope. every day our dreams are becoming blue with democracy. maybe democracy for sale on al jazeera, the, for showcase of the best document free films from across the network. on al jazeera,

[000:00:00;00] the safe them even come in as an international inside corruption excellence award. nominator here on now. the is there any forces kill a us active as during a protest against the legal settlements in the occupied west by the my money in sight? this is all and is there a life the also coming up? total trump won't be sentence until off to the us presidential election is off to