yeah, in these little shelters of stick on store their property, they'll find me land as well as their homes house or being something most local authorities believe between 5 and 6000 people have been affected. i they are afraid this michael, would you be the beginning? the i'm real about this and then don't have the top stories and i'll just do them. at least to 31. palestinians have been killed within 24 hours after israel's military . it's densely populated refugee camps in residential areas in garza and apartments and operations. refugee camp has been head killing a mother and her son. warplanes of also attacked a school where families were sheltering and is your body. a refugee camp in northern garza, at least 8 palestinians have been killed there. sort of thing. yeah. not ish, the tumor cells talking to the tents. not even a concrete building or

a tunnel. we came down really good. and we saw among the people killed a woman who was preparing note for her child. the siege hung up and destruction. we've experienced enough thought a couple of them has more from general bala and central gaza. the, the is really military is a still run the garbage smell, its right, a tax the for out the fight to get found out to lower your grounds. and the noise of the strip by attacking the activation senses and residential phones. now these areas are no longer can seem to be size to kind of as many as, especially in light of the growing destruction on the trucks that had been carried out in the past 24 hours on the aforementioned areas. 18 in the sense what areas of gauze are families have pretty targeted specially and then there's a rush refugee camps more children have been killed to recently received at the specs nationwide the united nation. it's 2 parts and those on the ground level be is ready to ration is all still ongoing skin roof off. basically,

we have 3 types of things that they use by all means are still empowering. the military precedence in missouri, corey adults, philadelphia, one egyptian buddhist levy is buddy all me toe now is because of how you doing this humanitarian conditions. all palestinians who are right now struggling to afford the bags a committee code. ask you a minute, terry. and this is, it is a light of this ongoing cottage that had surpassed more than 11 months or deadly consultations at the time that we come off and it's not on the grounds. tarika residence will just be right there is that i had a strong around $750.00 size and people have taken to the streets in israel. the biggest demonstrations in its history, the calling on prime minister benjamin netanyahu to do a deal to bring home captives held in garza, many people have been arrested and some are accusing the police of using excessive force that is really not position candidate. edmondo gonzalez is heading to spain

in the wake of a government crackdown because others had been seeking refuge at the spanish embassy and cut off. as off at a venezuelan court issued a warning for his arrest president because my daughter declared victory in the july election. the opposition insist gonzales won the majority of the vote. protesters in london never return to the straits on saturday to demand an end to the war and gossip they're calling on the british government to stop sending weapons to israel . they also say they want this really military to end its attacks and the occupied westbank in canada at 21 boys have not been confirmed date after a fire tore through a school elementary, the flames and golf to school on thursday as more than a 150 students slept a 139 children had been accounted for, but another 17 are still missing. it's not clear yet what caused the fire. and several students have been injured and central can. yep. and another 5,

this time at a girls school, it happened initially all the time. police say adama trains being damaged, emergency teams about the scene, and then investigations underway into the cause of the fire. in brazil, former far wide president shadow most and nato, has joined a protest against the shutdown of social media platform. x. as of people have rallied in sa, paulo calling for the impeachment of a supreme court judge who ordered a bond on the platform last week. thousands of people across the front and so being protesting against the nomination of michelle bung. the, as the new prime minister, left during parties came 1st and the general election 2 months ago, but presidents emanuel met my call or rejected their candidate for prime minister and appointed me. his critics say the election has been stolen. and those are the headlines. the news continues here on, i'll just go off to the price of progress the,

[000:00:00;00] the really, the new world, what industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put the products on

the market. we need a regulation so we don't do crazy things because maybe sometimes who would do credit things. i don't know, but i'd accept that we have regulation. we once we get asian as english and if we don't behave then yes, penalty. that's fine. the always case of the industry makes money, of course it does. if the industry did not make money, how many people will be out of work, the worst sort of the last concert and the public interest and the public safety is definitely not taking precedence. corporate interest, corporate profits have been getting priority with the regulator, so that needs to change. and one of the big ways to do that is just to require transparency, the we, we loved the transparency we have with likes to publish everything we use. it's

just not allowed and we use it. so i cannot say we don't care. there's intellect, property rights, but we, if so we publish every things. it would just be breaking the law the way they prefer you today to of properties to the house of children. the if you make money out of selling pesticides, how much incentive does these companies do? these companies have to get us off pesticides, who they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or who they make sure that we use always more pesticides. the today industry pieces to spend millions of euro's not being to day recreation is the state of researching, substitutes and how to make these things different.

the it's in the industries an interest to bring food to the tables that it's safe, that it's high quality. that is reasonably priced so that you and i and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat a good, nutritious food every day as a reasonable price. the progress involves risk, you are referring to an to accident. so you just really into that and so i see that and so people who are injured or people die every time just happens for industry in general defeats however, those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to programs. and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefits. the,

where these progress is probate moving forwards, whatever, and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful that it's good for, for the people we, we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progresses. i don't think that progress is viewed in the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that, that, that can create disease and he's cancer to, to someone who's going to use

the if we weren't today was a profession, your principal problem, you will not have openings and these will not exist because everything, sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 5060000 people die with the accidents. so percussion, reprints the point i think is a disaster. and yet, this is once we all know one more advocating and you applies to other culture.

we are farming in europe with less substances than most americans. most americans use this tools, you know, seats because we don't use g m o 's. we don't use technology. i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not the and in europe we have this romantic idea or formulas business. b, to say was never called debates. something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need fittest business people and we shouldn't that them to the business the

and we can't expect them to act in any other way. except the only way that would change is if there is a, a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business. and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world. because as long as we treat like a global commodity, we have a very big problem. the and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder and the highest bid or may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bid, or maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food,

the will be some disease, all about making money, the prophets, and some of the big corporations. it's about any form of the big uniform lens with one called maximum. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also, economically, it's about international markets import export. it's all about companies controlling in far away places lands to explore commodities. there's another box for production is not about feeding people. the industrial agriculture is

a form of mining and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses at the most of the use go into animal food and text us 5, a fuel, whatever. you have the, the rest of it can be sold more expensive to some other use will go into process in food processing the so it's foot a necessity. always food, a business transaction. food as both. yeah. so we all need to eat. that's for sure . but in europe, we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in uniform, severe, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one to

a month to another month. so we have tend to, doesn't really matter to us if we have a 2 more tomorrow. and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food, no a days. this is the big confusion between which is a genuine interest in the interest of industry. because the priorities drops and growth and it strikes, growth at jobs are more important than people's nights. the, the food industry is successful, will create more jobs, will create more value added, it will create more throat. so i don't see why we shouldn't also fight for the interest of the industry, but this should be a communal fights. modern

agriculture we dies on satellites relies on precision farming, which is the connection between satellites digital machinery and then all of the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as pre production in agriculture because of an overly conservative restrictive regulation. and these tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what under the i think your opposite is the best potential to be the leading agricultural region

in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs and the most invested in seeds in a hybridization genetic expressly sides gave me cause machinery. we shouldn't be because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to which much what we want to see is something very different as a model built on diversity. on biological diversity, that is, you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations, do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfigure rate together? how we operate on this planet? well, we will make also subsidies the that's defined and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they

have to be then assistant to our goals. well, many people, if i say that would say yes, yes, of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through a technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment are now foot system that operates was in the planetary boundaries. as scientists, i've been to find you where i respect the rules of the planet and not vice versa, that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms what progress do we want?

are we willing to trade off some of the benefits for some of the risk because we're facing a world which is more and more globalized? so we are up against the other parts of the world, which do not always play with the same rules. the, there are geo political issues in the past of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the was either to 8 or to producing it themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land. because we found use more land. ecologies more resources,

the c one cities or the moment you simply that come in, they sort of must have a lovely yes accumulate going on. we come into a scene to the side of the list that don't allow us. the plug is us. got uh no, i don't remember either one of them. i'd be in doubt. you may be called the do you imagine the number of, from the diseases that are in every family today is not due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all breast cancer?

once. that's not true. so it is due to an apartment and 2, probably poisons that's out in the environment. what all the chronic bodies is designed to be toxic initially and spreads all over the place. first, the yes it did to get across the booklet. all that i'm credit the sitting that you're trying, you'll continue enough to bundle mama can you can see have you anything else for me? the cool no flip side of my p o s will credit to take you to the sign you up to we didn't talk to the momma you from . i told you me to stop equal. you know, mean i'm a pull of my vehicle so they took it easy enough to understand either the

volume they said they basically got feeling. so it looks it goes so totally okay. maybe i'm getting the boot the boot the they don't know, go make demos in there. are they usually i like this to be a part of my say with the game this the guess over the less governor of the less than that to me as well. good night and then we'll see why. usually 50 located again out of the nato, the to the i don't think because of it, because this will start to skip within the year. this is joe bitten menu. us the locate called layer of a speed, a baby. don't this yet waste a total of interest to control moines. focus that stuff. yes. by sense control list, decision toxic us, but a lot of approval, pre owned by the system. all of them are non open city fitness. i stuck in one

piece of instruction page us used to separately will within by subject on us from the know the se in north canada she didn't know to put on your leave. we did must be motor. she'll she'll to you if you have, we'll give you a minute or 2 how stupid under the last few months to kinda loop in a brute to seem to be wanting you to might be think i'll shoot it to inform you until you meet with the media to see a scene football soon, so she cannot go get it, but i will because she will see to it. but i'm a few that getting into my to get on the team, go get for a while. i mean, come for them to come even will come morning and we will have you with the inside all of us giving it to mother to be sent over to you and my new product. and we

still have them later. lens, one of us will be document tomorrow. no, it's on the in the office, but i can't seem to be on board kaloni plus 40. i gave it to us as in the me to double. she's what indies both. but of course don't seem to be as well that you'd have to think what, okay, and do you know i'd like to the media? no. forget about the to the uh for the title and sort of see though my daughter, caesar thin plastic go my daughter. see the, the law and what i see only enough out in the complex of fraud avo coronado law say that the for the real model. see of, you know, the ma'am indeed many,

it was the openings to modern agriculture have understood that it's and it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to and to use fear as a strong the emotional driver for it and changing policy and for influencing policy. sometimes it's in the interest of the industry groups to do the ass, of course, because it keeps them at work brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes have visits from them. recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and threw me in your and threatening classroom stuff, those, but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fights, he gets when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that we have bows and arrows and they have different bones. as soon as there's an end,

your group of people who are again something maybe, maybe the advantage, maybe they stop using it, maybe they sell them 14. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a reach. and when i say industry has the truth, we know what's in our products, for example like that. if i, if i make a product mean you can go home this evening and make it buy a in your kitchen. and you know what's. ringback or, and you rise at times actually is the truth. sorry, but to know we are an industry, we know what we pushing of products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we push them across in our products. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about and i'm not talking about philosophically the truth, i'm talking about what we do,

we know what we do and we can talk about that the on the to know or does it cover you the domains do the video as soon as they face all or something. the 50 seed, these are jam, they put it on and then i have read the book to please understand and they push what i'm into, see it back to them on acre uh. and these are house for the if you demo the, these if you guys show me and these in the citizen just here, hold on, for example, the schedule. se for this to see do more on that house read on sunday glass when that was what was on a violence and i was planning on doing additional still under the same also i think you should have this. you may not cause it shows you party or the cause you don't see it. no, no, our quotes re coffee those here it is official. i something coffee das here in

front of me with this, you want to see pool of a local, another method for the call. so i'm at the apple to solve. so could, can it could pass on, i live saw where live the, our, for zones on those probably done. these are some east of precision on this, i think for me. so i did have a probably most on to pay the, the

deals, the french republic, his loan proclaimed the just moody's mode in front, in a full pock series. the big picture takes in, in depth ness, france insight, episode one on elegy sierra reporting in the field means i also get the witness, not just news as breaking, but also history. as it's unfolding from serbia. one day i might be covering politics. i might be covering protest, what's most important to me is understanding what they are going through so that i can convey the headlines in the most human way possible. just here to we believe everyone has a story worth hearing,

the the to madison and don't have the top stories analogy 0. at least $31.00 palestinians have been killed within 24 hours south to israel's ministry, had densely populated refugee camps and residential areas. in garza and apartment and elbow, a refugee complex being hit, killing a mother and her son. wal planes of also attacked her school for families for sheltering. and there's a body of refugee camp in northern garza, at least age palestinians have been killed there. sort of thing. yeah, not ish,

the tumor cells talking to the 10th, not even a concrete building or a tunnel. we came down really good. and we saw among the people killed the woman who was preparing note for her child. the siege hung up on destruction. we've experienced enough around 750000 people to take him to the streets in israel, the biggest demonstrations in its history. the calling on prime minister benjamin netanyahu to do a deal to bring home captives held in garza. many people have been arrested and some of the keys and the police of using excessive force around us for the position candidate of bundle. gonzales is heading to spain. in the wake of a government crackdown gonzales have been seeking refuge at the spanish embassy and cut us off from a venezuelan court issued a warrant for his arrest president nicholas monroe to declare victory in the july election. but the opposition insist gonzalez won the vote in can you had 21 boys have not been confirmed dad. officer, a fire at the school drama tree, finds engulfed to school on thursday as more than

a 150 students slept. a 139 children had been accounted for, but another 17 are still missing. it's not clear yet what caused the fire. an investigation is underway, essential can you after several students were injured in another 5 this time at a girls school. it happened an issue all the time and central can you? in brazil, farmer fluoride president jeff boston auto is joined to protest against the shutdown of social media platform x. thousands of people of riley's in south paulo calling for the impeachment of a supreme court judge ordered a band of a platform last week. the government says ex, didn't comply with the country's laws. thousands of people across funds have been protesting against the nomination of michelle finally, as the new prime minister laughed during parties came 1st and the general election 2 months ago, but presidency manual, michael rejected their candidates for prime minister. his critics say elections being stolen,

those are the headlines will be back in about half an hour. the that is that companies have to submit studies to european commission. they do the studies themselves. uh they have to submitted studio commission and to esa, so they are paying food safety authority and they have a panel of experts that looks at studies and then they say, okay, safe or not. uh so what do we have found is that within the expert panel, she has a lot of people with dice with the food industry. so that means the co 6 interest

the so if someone wants to also replace the product in your, let's say a plan protection product. this person because this person or this company, the applicant, has to provide data that allows us, as the risk, assesses to judge whether this product is safe or not. and this information comes from the applicants and the studies that are commissioned by the applicant to allow us to assess the safety piece by the applicant, obviously. so it's the intellectual property of the applicant. and we can property sparks of these studies in the car, in the legal framework. but we also have to respect the pieces confidentiality claims of the applicants. so there is a balance to be found between transparency as much as possible, but also to predict the,

the investment of companies in 2 the product innovations. exactly like in the middle ages you were asking to the priest, what is a truth in? no, you ask to these scientists and regulatory agencies, what is the truth and they act in the same manner as magician. you know, because they work on secret concerns. we see chris effects, they say that you cannot to blush that however they say they have the truth. the if you spend a huge amount of money doing, study a study on something. there's a lot of confidential information that you don't want. another company to copy paste, of course not. i mean, you might have spent years a lot of resources. so people time,

a lot of time and money on doing this research at what exit does is it on our lives as little as i should publish the results. so it will publish and it will come out with the statement at the end. and, and it will publish the results, but it will publish all the details of what a lot of people want to see because there are people for free, for our relative eyes. ok. because so it's actually a lot of people, but some people and i want to see everything. that's fine. i think now it's actually a little bit published, but you're talking about several thousands of pages. i didn't know who in his white mind would sit down and read through all of those pages. i think some parts can be blacked up, but i would insist that that's to do with privacy. so the relationship between all companies and research institutes and universities is quite strong. and as i mentioned before, and many parts of the world, it tends to be the public sector developing the products. thanks to relationship with the company. maybe the company donated the technology. the problem in europe

for example, is that an s, so that you mentioned before, they have scientists assessing the products and the sciences. have a obligation to have no conflict of interest. that means they have to have, have no relationship whatsoever with industry ever. so if you're a scientist and you're having a, any kind of dealing with a company close as a number of avenues of work later. so again, we are really champions in creating difficulties for ourselves in europe. but the rest of the world is doing fine. the running around or jo hollingsworth for monsanto. and with me is my partner, eric lasker, and to on his right is john caleb. and next to john is maybe line right in

the thank you very much know your colleagues to the 2nd final which will look at the transparency and use of scientific studies and the assessment of life proceed in the united states. and the hopefully will provide insight into the so called most of the papers. thank you very much for inviting me to be here today as a journalist for some 30 years now. i'm someone who has spent most of my life focusing on facts pursuing the truth. i've spent roughly 20 of those 30 years delving into the dealings of monsanto. and i can confidently tell you that the

story of the company's top sewing chemical glasses say is not one of truth, but one of defeat. it's sort of a treasure trove and look inside a very big and powerful company that has been very secretive, you know, for decades. and a lot of the information is quite alarming. when it comes to public health and safety associated with the use of their popular product life and state and round it . another way in which montana has manipulated regulators in the public is by establishing networks of scientists around the world to support its agenda and its message about the safety of this chemical, monsanto, and, or the monsanto back let's, as a task force, pays them the lobby regulators they author papers, essentially to push this message that the chemical is safe. there are many individuals and there are many types of different relationships that we've seen in these documents. you can see here that professor david kirkwood is one such paid, expert montana,

was relying on the 2012 months and it was very worried about gina toxicity questions arising from like to say, research when it engaged person. monsanto needed someone to help counter these concerns that were for assisting what bill hayden's wrote in the email. i think i was just not eve and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision. we all have decades of experience in the industry, and therefore we have reputations to maintain. and that means that there is no point in those being all responding to the influence of, of one stakeholder over another. because those reputations wouldn't be destroyed. i

can say absolutely an attempt to go like categorically this paper was not ghost written. we all inputs our own sections to the paper. there was no input involvement or influence of the review by monsanto. thank you. thank you. well, it seems a pair of the month, central actually fears, real independent authentic sites. monsanto said itself, it feared the arc review when it found in in 2014. this is for eric, sat down before the classification. monsanto says it fears this. it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability and epidemiology toxicology, geno talks, montana officials even predicted the glass, the state would warrant a possible or probable rating. with respect to f, as in echo you know, f as a process is defined as a peer review, and i understand that and that's, i don't have a problem with that peer review problem in this case is that's not, was,

was done. nobody went back and verified the findings on the original studies. and by failing to verify those findings, it cascaded through the entire review process, such that you don't have the answer which is based on the best science hudson's of the say important to me some that we have doing the proper independent assessment. and that the, according with the results of the be happy nessa, according to the regulations that focus on the use of the active assessments. and based on that we generate the risk assessments regarding the independence from industry is clearing the legislation. i would say the 6 is the basic principle, the company that the once the market something the you must pay for the assessment . so this studies have conducted by industry that is built up. the current process is scientifically floyd. it is time to have an independent panel assigned to evaluate the way in which the science is reviewed. there's a need for the regulatory agencies to re analyze the data, and there's

a need to publicly publicly release all of the analyses and data to improve the transparency of this process. these are not the actions of a company that has nothing to hide. this is not how you promote a product. this is that's actually proven safe. this is how you whitewash unfortunate and unprofitable facts. this is not by accident, but by design, and it serves monsanto very well, but it does not seem that it serves the public interest. thank you. of the monsanto prepared certain documents for the registration and the s a report if you look at it has taken directly certain language from the monsanto documents and just placed it in the after the report. so there's a lot of concern about whether f so really did an independent analysis or whether they just took the position to be against i or at monsanto's request. so that is not an independent assessment. how can we verify or expect that on the basis of

such robust scions and i'm quoting industry, we can make a decision. politicians in the end, you can make a decision to protect the people that if somebody you know has said hello to the industry at some stage in his life, that should not mean that that particular assign to should be banned from a panel or research has been funded somewhere by someone, many of the scientists that have a lot of and a half now left the organization and their science panels because they have been accused of having worked with the industry. but since when does that make a science as dishonest? the why? so having worked with the industry some years ago on the small projects, at some stage i did, i'm a scientist by training. and when i was in university, of course i was looking for a grant to do my research. because some research can cost a lot of money. i was helped by industry. i haven't spoken to that particular

industry now for for many, many years. it's been a long time since i was in college. but that doesn't mean i'm dishonest. as a scientist. the know you're estates to be in the region where influence is very high and other regions will get to europe for it for regulation. and that's why it's so important that you're at the keeps regulation which is scientific, which is database. and which as much as possible,

besides results being influenced by, by, i would say by noise or by, in just the emotions and fear the with science meets values. and it's becoming complicated as we come with the science with evidence we do and as a scientific process of risk assessment. but then this evidence is given on another stage on the policy level. they are believes emotions, values come in. and what we see is a 40 additions don't like the outcome of our risk assessment. they don't question therapy leave. they question the validity of the process. so basically if it's a comes with an opinion,

let's say you may only continue. it's in 6 decides additions allows i have so they won the food have so you are protecting the bees, you're doing the right thing really going to act on there. so we all applaud to you, and it's the same process with the same people. with the same scrutiny comes with the conclusion. let's say i'm glad for say, people say, i'm sorry, i don't like these off come. if so, she would not say the tie for say this relative pretty safe. so if so must be corrupt. i find this very bizarre the, you know, regulations is independent of corporate influence and, and it's everything is tested actually tested and with a lot of money and, and, and, and our authorities are looking at it independently. i don't know where these

people have been living even in some of the mainstream, john is you don't find reports that clearly explained that this is not happening. we are seeing corporate capture not only in the sciences it sciences is one of the fields we see corporate capturing in every walk of life. the . i'd like to say it seems to be very highly charged. not because of the safety of dr for say, but because of g and because of one song though, because of international trade, maybe even because of inequality, with global traits. few facades, assessments itemized. i guess it's the mazda for positive, 50 feet. then you facade, supposed to out and put in at all. then. yeah,

and medium box models. thank you for those to detect direction solution to that and people sites, the volt goodness district is really awesome story. the fill of the, of course, if the science is works for the company, that's a different story. but i think we need to be a little bit more realistic about what it is we want. do we want the best scientists to assess the products to get to make sure they're safe? or do we want to make sure there's no conflict of interest? what does the objective is of the safety of the product? because of the conflict of interest of the, of the scientist, i think we need to be a bit more honest and trustworthy without forwarding into the mistake. so. so that's not something that we have a few for that. um, the, the,

the experts we use are as independent as possible. but i think also here it's not black or white. it's not serial one that's not a digital binary approach. we have to find the right balance between the best expertise between people that have done research, the people that are with both the feet in, in the scientific endeavor. and on the other hand, to make sure that there is no conflict of interest. and if i may say or something, i think europe needs to make a decision whether we know i think i stop here. yes. that's what leads to far too much, but they don't ask of a medium. she'll get the seat of it then and push on us the height of going to that's already. so i see on this to the new business,

the left america unit attempt to take a set that all the 100 of funding for we and last or kind of stuff. you know, once he left that i live in atlanta. so need to look into this one that's good, that'll help us improve a little less. but i it's really a local machine out of band and but i'm in total bill. yeah, the contracts. all that i can see that that's one that's good for the last time it was on here. i don't know if that's alice, but if we can move it out and kind of think that the cutting that the so yes, precautionary principle is and di, scientific entities. i think it's a big issue for you. okay. and economy in general, because it reduces the income is a willingness of some investment the,

there is a risk in registering a new purchase. so this is a risk. this is a benefit. i'm a willing to take this risk. yes or no. and the regulation today gives us an answer if you look at the car of today, it is much safer than the car yesterday. you know, the 1st car that i drove in when i was a boy and my father was driving, had no safety built in the house. no, i had no airbag and underway be yes and uh, and its z acom acre was not a murder. is it is a car was like this and it was a very safe call for the time. and i'm just saying that the bessie says of 1950. uh you know where fantastic. but by, as in their way, very with bessie side. and then we'll just go over that the house on the side effects and then the regulation. evils and regression becomes more demanding and especially sides of bond or are withdrawn from the company. and that's no more that's normal. it will ition of any industry,

the power of innovation doesn't come from the big companies. the big companies are too big to be innovative anymore. they just want to preserve that present, that just but they're not innovating anymore. let me look at look at the the, the gm and the pesticides were dealing with gm plants that were develop 13 years ago. nothing has changed. its be notified resistance since the beginning it's old chemicals or so. the integration in the innovation is that we now have in addition to round the ready. busy and roundup resist implants, we have become a resistant plans m to, for the resistant place. so we're getting an even more cocked toxic cocktail. it does that innovation. it has to get out. it just has to get benefits versus risk, right? what use a risk you're willing to accept on the environment? even if it's very small, in order to have

a safe and affordable food supply. the, to me, the defining factor in the future will also be around, i'll acro fruit system. if we manage to get our, in my view, this functional aggregate foot system on the sound, environmental economics, social and economic basis, then we solve everything else. we come from, the eastern climate change and these things health issues and our mental issues, social issues are collateral. they're all part of the, of this whole thing that is connected. and the connect, the connecting, sent a piece is, is food. and how you produce the,

because we see the world as it t's. we are in fact, at the border age of the revolution. because human kind of is able to do that, how much time that will take, how much i mean misery is that will create i don't know, but that's i'm for me. you know, there is a french writer peer hobby. he said, this is a collie bri, i fair. so i'm just a little bird in the system doing my job as much on via the in europe. we're not going to give off. we're not gonna. there are lots of other

technologies. it's not just about g, m o, there are lots of other technologies coming up and the companies are committed to invest in yourself as well. despite that, being so uncomfortable is a euphemism to work. here the, the teachers protesting in front of ogden tina's congress are met with stronger assistance by the police. they come here to demand better wages and to protest against a new law if the government wants to pass. that will declare education and essential service, which would deny teachers the right to strike. the government of have you had any legs implementing a very harsh austerity plan to renew government spending on fight inflation. it has reduced the funding of public universities around the country by 30 percent. and that's one of the reasons why the university of one of site is,

has gone on strike. the only funding that's arrived is to pay for electricity, and most of the professors have received a minimal raise in spite of the inflation relays plan is a disaster for us. have you had any days convinced and will stay with the plan could and the high inflation rate. but universities in the public sector saying they need more resources now. and many are not convinced monet's radical, liquid nomic plan. we succeed. the hello normal service has been resumed across the middle east. this hopped and hazy sunshine for the most part was the one or 2 showers of possibility just around the southern end of the red sea, but nothing too much to speak of here. even though hot temperatures around 38 celsius over the next couple of days, i took the type of woman as we go through monday in a separate woman that for q weight. and also in the fact that they get plenty of sunshine around a fair. but a sunshine to around the eastern side of the mediterranean, stuckey, i will see a scattering

a shower as the heaviest of which will be across the northern parts of the country, up toward c, a g, quite a brisk wind blowing in across the chain. so what's the weather there for a time to just around the black sea, but they're really heavy. right. and you can see that's making his way towards the balkans to was grace as we go on into the pots of next week, fans. so not a web web web to whether that is coming else as a north west of africa. some heavy pulse is afraid into morocco, northern areas of algeria, into the west side of the med, it's right in and that will slide 5 east with central africa. i still same plans, your showers, wanna see showers to into southern africa and with the winds coming in from a southerly direction. it's looking pretty cold in cape town, 14 celsius on sunday. picking up and brightening up for monday. the

exploring diverse culture examining political discourse, exposing societies, doctor award winning in dense investigations. the good compelling insights into humanity holds and untold stories from asia or in the pacific one. 0 one east on. ouch is here. ready too often of kind of style and it's put tray through the prism of war. but there were many of the kind of stuff thanks to the braves, individuals who risk their lives to protect it from destruction. an extraordinary film archives funding for decades reviews the forgotten truth of the countries mold in history. the forbidden real part 3. the rise of the majority dean on us just either the,

the knowledge is with the, [000:00:00;00] the hello i'm 0 venue. it's good to have you with us. this is the news our life i'm doing. coming up in the program. this our major protests against is really prime minister benjamin netanyahu bring tel aviv to a standstill. demonstrators want the government to agree on a ceasefire deal to free. the remaining candidates in gaza. morris really air

strikes across the gaza strip. the deputy head of the civil defense agency in the north of the strip is killed along with his family venezuela's opposition