and hungary, for the experiences of those who live in every day, there is a patch shut on us, but we have to be very careful, of course, and we have to be big enough to support how democracy dies. democracy may be on al jazeera, the clock into how the top stories here on out 0, and then the tackle into you and run school, housing displaced, palestinians, and central jobs that has killed at least 18 people. 6 interest off members are among the dead at the, on this refugee camp. fee agency says it is the highest death toll for it stuff in a single incident in the 11 months for target versus who was at the scene. a short time of to see a tech. and i'm now in a job when it's cool in almost a rocks, roughly as you come on, this is the impact solely or destroyed. now we can clearly see the grade level of

destruction being inflected to that you on run show to about is housing. thousands of palestinians, some of these we can see huge holes in blue. we can see people are looking for anything in order to fuse off to the destruction of this you on run, show ta, this kind of destruction is unprecedented. and i can see you on smells the smell of lunch because of the strike now files of ruffles and even. 1 does have been absolutely unfolding this entire area that top has been carried out by in years, very flight to just and we can see here, let me show you that has been used to attack the this, the recreation center eye. witnesses have confirmed that this evacuation center has been hits in that time, what people were waiting for food. well, and we've been in a lot of a sudden it was a huge explosion. distinction of the school is dedicated only to women. women and

children were blowing to pieces. we rushed to see our children, but found them 20 paces. this is the 1st time the 1st time the school building has been pounded by is ready, war planes. it is supposed to be a safe sheltering area of my children, and 6 of them were killed. these children, terrorists make god punished them these release, destroyed all high killed and stuffed people. women, a widow and children, often 6 children, including a baby twin. what crime, what rome did these innocent children do? this valley generally only has been seen about creation centers in the past couple of months in a very intensive read them where at least more than 15, about 3, for instance, has been called. it said, this story has been carried out in an area that police must be protected from the principles of international law. what people have been speaking safety in this place funding is, but um, it has checked to that safety that can no longer be easily restored to erica by

zoom out just the euro. on the so ross, palestine, or when the occupied westbank is ready strike talking of a can, it's killed 3 people because bust into flames and to cut them lights on wednesday night. the nearby house also called them 5 for his, for the president of better for him or he is died at the age of 86 more. he was pub in december of the spending years in jail for human rights violations are being bought in protest from the origin tied capital up on his errors. this, as congress voted to uphold president harvey and malays voter features of a bill to increase pension of the president says the bill will put the countries time for a fiscal balance at risk. but protest is to say the high rate of inflation that's followed malaise currency devaluation made the increase, necessary parties being recovered in northeast nigeria of the flooding caused by the collapse of a dime. so the people that confirmed that rescue is for the thousands of people

still try to call for to have my degree underwater. pals being taught to move into a 200000 times and businesses in the us state of louisiana ought to be last by a tropical storm. the distance making line fully installed was flooded roads and torn down trees and power lines initially a hurricane this week. and this is moved across the state the right to succeed for me because she does depends prime minister has begun with the record name kind of, it's in the frame. the voted to become the new leader of the liberal democratic party takes place. the 2 weeks consecutive l d. p has governed almost uninterrupted for decades and holds the majority in part of that would state with headlines, more news coming up here on out to 0 right off to the price of progress the the

. ready the really, the new world with the industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put the products on the market. we need a regulation,

so we don't do crazy things because maybe sometimes we do credit things. i don't know. but at acceptance we have regulation. we once we get asian as english, and if we don't behave then yes, penalty, that's fine. the always who's in the industry makes money. of course it does. if the industry does not make money, how many people will be out of work? or sort of the last concern, the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedence. corporate interest, corporate profits have been getting priority with the regulator. so that needs to change. and one of the big ways to do that is just to require transparency. if we, if we locked transparency, we would like to publish everything we use. it's just not allowed and reassessed. i cannot say, we don't care. there's intellect, property rights, but we,

if so we publish every things. it will just be breaking the law the they prefer intellectual property to the house of children. the if you make money out of selling pesticides, how much incentive does these companies do? these companies have to get us off pesticides, who they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or who they make sure that we use always more pesticides. the today industry pieces to spend millions of euro's not being to do this, it reduces the state of the searching substitutes and how to make these things differently. the,

it's in the industries an interest to bring food to the tables that is safe. that is high quality that is reasonably priced so that you and i, and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good, nutritious food every day at a reasonable price, the progress and goals risk. you are referring to, to accidents. you just really into that and so i see that. and so people who are injured or who people die every time just happens for industry in general defeats however, those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to progress. and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefits. the where these progress

is progress and moving forwards, whatever. and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful that it's good for the people . we say put some intelligence on what technology and what progresses. i don't think that progress is viewed in the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that, that can, that can create disease and he's can so to, to someone who's trying to use a textbook the, the, the

. ready the if we went today was a progression, your principal problem. you will not have airplanes, and these will not exist because everything, sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 5060000 people die with the accidents. so percussion, reprints the point i think is a disaster. and yet, this is what we are now more and more advocating. and you applies these 200 culture . we are farming in europe. we've list substances as and most americans,

most americans use this tools, you know, seats because we don't use g m o 's. we don't use technology. i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not the and in europe. we have this romantic isaiah or fondles business people. they would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need fittest business people and we sent them to the business the and we can't expect them to us in any other way, except as the only

way that would change is if there is a, a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business, and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat like a global commodity, we have a very big problem. the and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder. and the highest bidder may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bid, or maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food. the

reason disease of making money isn't products. it's about the big corporations it's about the form of the big uniform lens with one cross action and it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also economically, it's about international markets import export. it's all about companies controlling in far away places, lands which board commodities. there's another box for production is not about feeding people. the industrial agriculture is a form of mining and it produces raw

materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses at the most of the use go into animal food and text outs, 5 of fuel, whatever you have the rest of it to can be sold more expensive to some other use will go into process in food processing the so it's foot a necessity, always showed a, a business transaction food as both. yeah. so we all need to eat. that's for sure. but in europe, we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in uniform, severe, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one to a month to a no to month. and we have 10 to you. doesn't really matter to us if we have

a gym or tomorrow and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food, no a days. this is the big confusion between which is a genuine interest in the interest of industry. because the priorities drops and growth and it states growth at drugs of more important people's lives. the if the food industry is successful, it will create more jobs will create more value added, it will create more growth. so i don't see why we shouldn't also fight for the interest of the industry, but this should be a communal fights. the modern agriculture relies on satellites relies on precision farming,

which is the connection between satellites digital machinery and then all of the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as pre production in agriculture because of an overly conservative restrictive regulation. and these tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what under the i think your opposite is the best potential to be the leading agricultural region in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs, and the most invested in seats in the hybridization genetically expressed. besides,

gave me calls machinery. we shouldn't be because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to which much in what we want to see is something very different as a model built on diversity. on biological diversity, that is, you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations, do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfigure rate together? how we operate on this planet? all we will make also subsidies the that's defining, moving, and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they have to be then assistant to our goals. well, as many people, if i say that would say yes,

yes, of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through a technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment are now foot system that operates was in the planetary boundaries. as scientists, i've been to find you where i respect the rules of the planet and not vice versa, that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms what progress do we want? are we willing to trade off some of the benefits for some of the risk because we're

facing a world which is more, more globalized? so we are up against the other parts of the world, which do not always play with the same rules. the . there are 2 political issues and parts of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the was either $28.00 or 2 producing it themselves, and to produce more food on the same amount of land because we found use more land . ecologies more resources the,

let's see that not one cities of the moment. just simply the command, they sort of must have a lovely yes accumulate going on. we come into it seem to be south milledge that don't allow us the legacy that's got on your plan, okay? and remember, we will be in dallas, you may be called the do you imagine the number of friendly diseases that are in every family today is not due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all press concepts once that's not true. so it is due to an environment and to probably

poisons that's out in the environment. what all the chronic bodies is designed to be top 6 initially and spreads all over the place. best design the yes it did to share that because as i'm either book natal i'm credit does she think that you're trying you're continuing with the mama. can you cause it? have you anything else for me? the cool, no flip side of model t o s will credit it, take you to this tanya of 2. we didn't talk to the momma if someone to, to me to you know, meet almost all of my vehicle so they take it easy enough to understand either the high index if, if they've been feeling sort of toxic goes so totally okay. maybe i'm getting the

boot the boot the they don't know, go make demos in there. are they usually i like this to be a part of my say with the game this the gets over, the less governor of the less than that i'm is we're getting right now. we'll see you. i used to live 50 located again out of the nato. the to the i don't do because of it because this will stuff. just keep with any of this is joe bitten menu. us the locate gomez, speed a baby the ship waste, a total of interest to go to multiple cars that are still stuff. yes. by sense not going through our list. this isn't toxic us, but a lot of it broke the own by the system i would or more non open city finish. i stuck a non piece of stuff. bit just use the center they will within by subject comes

from the know the st. you know, it cannot be put on your leave. we do must be motor. she'll she'll to you if you have we'll get a few minutes. we also put on the the last few months to open up route to seem to be the only became demonte thing. i see that the financial gimme was so do you see the scene for washington? cuz he cannot go get it, but i will cuz he will see to the bottom of see if that getting in the month the case on the team go get complement cutting will come one x 10 must meet with the and so all of us giving it to me updated to be sent over to you and my new product, and we still have them later learn some of us with the document tomorrow. no.

the in coastal stuffy but don't seem to be on what it was 40. i gave it to us. it's in the me to the, she's an individual, but a complex don't seem to be the wallet. you'd have to speak with. okay. and do you know how to talk to the media? no. forget about the to the uh for the title and sort of see the of my daughter, caesar thin plastic cool. my daughter sees or the law and what i see only in the south in they've conflict, but a fraud. avo. coronado said that the for the real model, see of, you know, the ma'am indeed many, it was your phones to modern agricultural have understood that it's and it's easy

to, to scare people. it's easy to and to use fear as a strong emotional driver for a change in policy and for influencing policy. sometimes it's in the interest of the, the empty industry groups to do that, as of course, because it keeps them at work brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes have visits from them. recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and threw me in your and tightening classroom stuff. hospice but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fight against, when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that we have bows and arrows and they have different bonds. as soon as there's an end, your group of people who are again something maybe, maybe the advantage,

maybe they stop using and maintenance of importing. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a reason when i say industry has the truth. we know what's in our products, for example like that. if i, if i make a product mean you can go home. this evening and make it buy a in your kitchen. you know, what's. ringback there and you write it down, that is the truth. sorry, but to know we are an industry, we know what we pushing our products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we put in a quote in our products. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about and i'm not talking about philosophically the truth, i'm talking about what we do, we know what we do. and we can talk about that the

on the to know though there's a cover, you don't the domain, the video as soon as a face or less on face the 50 seed. these are jam, the $40.00 in the hot. this is easy to both, to please understand the need to is what i'm going to see it back to normal. acre. uh, and these are house for the if you demo the, these, if you guys show me and these in the should is i'm just here hold on, for example, the schedule. see for $0.50 a month from now school. they don't on a glass. when that was what we don't need science and i was planning on doing the jump still under the boat. see most i thought you should have this. you may not cause it shows you party or the cause you don't see it. no, no, our quotes re coffee, those here it is a fish i something coffee das here in for me with this you see pool local now the

muff, 3rd party call. so i'm at the apple to solve for cook and it could be a son. i live saw where life the hour for zones on those probably done this. i shall east of decision on this. i think for me. so i did have a probably most onto the the lens seeds us. i bet your nominate decisions made from the white house. the sick millions around the world stay without your 0 for life, coverage of every twist and the special programming and correspondence across the country. both parties are looking for any small group they can get to put them over

the top. god bless the united states of america are great. the us elections on, oh, god promised abraham. this is the land that is going to want to you and to your children forever. more right here in my back yard sales, and they sense here. there is some realtors, you have to make sure you know where you're at. central michigan. we have people here from united states, from russia, from india, from germany to june. your findings for the idea of israel's foreign army on it. just yeah, that's all i could say on look exclusive offers. we'd be up to 25 percent of our free being folks get ready to watch the champions of a thrilling season between the year be leaks, asian and european 2026. well qualifies. the best of the tennis

will be the one to subscribe. now the to come out in the clock in the hall, the dumpster was here and out 0. and for us, an attack on a you and run school housing displays, palestinians in central garza has killed at least 18 people. 6 interest off members are among the dead, the district refugee camp. the agency says it's the highest death toll for it stuff and a single incident and a lot not pull target boomers at the see the short time after the attack. this valley generally army has been sitting about duration centers in the past couple of months and a very intensive read them where at least move in 16 about 2 weeks have since has

been call get to this slide has been carried out in an area that's at least must be protect to some of the principles of international law. what people have been speaking safety and displace funding is by the army has checked to that safety that can no longer be easily restored, directed by zoom out just the euro. and mr. ross, thomas, going through his former president's up at the for humanity is died at the age of 86 for he more he was credited with staring the country into economic growth in the 19 ninety's. but he liked to spend years in jail for human rights abuses, for he. maury was pausing december. there being violent protests in the origin time . confident one is there is this, is congress related to uphold president harvey and malays v to over bill to increase pension of the president says the bill will put the countries planned for a fiscal balance at risk, but protests to say the high rate of inflation that follows malays currency. the evaluation may be increased,

necessary bodies are being recovered in northeast and nigeria and dr. flooding caused by the collapse of the 30 people to confirm that rescue is fear. thousands of people are still track how is being taught to move into 100000 homes and businesses in the state of louisiana ought to be lashed by tropical storm. the distance making them full, the storms flooded roads and torn down trees and power lines. initially the heart couldn't, it's, we can, this is moved across the state. it is being severe flooding in northern thailand. those type you yankee sweeps through se asia stranded residence and sharing, right. had to be rescued by boat, just running flood waters engulfed the city center. at least 9 people have died. right, right. stating that lines one who is coming up here and on the 0 right off to the price of progress. so using the

that is that companies have to submit studies to european commission. they do the studies themselves. uh, they have to submitted studio commission and to extra so they are being some safety authority. and they as a panel of experts that looks at studies and then they say, okay, safe or not. uh, so what do we have found is that within these expert panels, we have lots of people with dice with the food industry. so that means the conflicts interest the so if someone wants to also replace the product in your let's say

a plan protection product. this person because this person or this company, the applicant, has to provide data that allows us, as the risk, assesses to judge whether this product is safe or not. and this information comes from the applicants and the studies that are commissioned by the applicant to allow us to assess the safety piece by the applicant, obviously. so it's the intellectual property of the applicant. and we can property each box of these studies in the car, in the legal framework. but we also have to respect the pieces confidentiality claims of the applicants. so there is a balance to be found between transparency as much as possible, but also to predict the, the investment of companies in to they are products. innovations

exactly like in the middle ages, you were asking to the priest, what is a truth in? no, you ask to these scientists and regulatory agencies, what is the truth and they act in the same manner as magician? you know, because they work on secrets can phones, we see chrysler effects. they say that you cannot blush that however, if i say they have the truth, the, if you spend a huge amount of money doing, study a study on something. there's a lot of confidential information that you don't want to. another company to copy paste. of course not. i mean, you might have spent years a lot of resources. so people time a lot of time and money. i'm doing this research at what asked it does it?

i'm or lives as long as i should publish it, the results. so it will publish and it will come out with the statement at the end and, and it will publish the results, but it will publish all the details and what a lot of people want to see because there are people for our relative eyes. ok. because so it's actually a lot of people, but some people and i want to see everything. that's fine. i think now it's actually open published what you're talking about, several thousands of pages. i don't know who in his white mind would sit down and read through all of those pages. i think some parts can be blacked up, but i would insist that that's to do with privacy. so the relationship between all companies and research institutes and universities is quite strong. and as i mentioned before, in many parts of the world, it tends to be the public sector developing the products, thanks to relationship with the company. maybe the company donated the technology. the problem in europe, for example, is that an s, so that you mentioned before, they have scientists assessing the products. and the scientists have

a obligation to have no conflict of interest. that means they have to have had no relationship whatsoever with industry ever. so if you're a scientist and you're having a, any kind of dealing with a company close as a number of avenues of work later. so again, we are ready champions and creating difficulties for ourselves in europe, but the rest of the world is doing fine. the running around or jo hollingsworth for monsanto. and with me is my partner, eric lasker, and to on his right is john caleb. and next to john is maybe line write them the

thank you very much. no, we move to the 2nd final which will look at the transparency and use of scientific studies and the assessment of life proceed in the united states. and the hopefully will provide insight into the so called most of the papers. thank you very much for inviting me to be here today as a journalist for some 30 years now. i'm someone who has spent most of my life focusing on facts pursuing the truth. i've spent roughly 20 of those 30 years delving into the dealings of monsanto. and i can confidently tell you that the story of the company's top sewing chemical glasses. 8 is not one of truth,

but one of the seats. it's sort of a treasure trove and look inside a very big and powerful company that has been very secretive, you know, for decades. and a lot of the information is quite alarming. when it comes to public health and safety associated with the use of their popular product life and state and around it. another way in which montana has manipulated regulators and the public is by establishing networks of scientists around the world to support its agenda. and it's message about the safety of this chemical, monsanto, and, or the monsanto back let's, as a task force, pays them the lobby regulators. they author papers, essentially, to push this message that the chemical is safe. there are many individuals and there are many types of different relationships that we've seen in these documents . you can see here that professor data kirkwood is one such paid, expert montana, was relying on the

2012 months and it was very worried about gino toxicity questions arising from like to say, research when it engaged. kirkland, monsanto needed someone to help counter these concerns that were for assisting what bill hayden's wrote in the email, i think i was just naive and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision. we all have decades of experience in the industry, and therefore we have reputations to maintain. and that means that there is no point in those being all responding to the influence of, of one stakeholder over another. because those reputations wouldn't be destroyed. i can say absolutely an attempt to go like categorically this paper was not ghost

written. we all inputs our own sections to the paper. there was no input involvement or influence of the review by monsanto. thank you. thank you. well, it seems a pair of the month santo, actually fears. real independent, authentic science months center said itself, it feared the i arc review when it found done in 2014. this is for eric sat down before the classification. monsanto says it fears this. it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability and epidemiology toxicology geno talks. most center officials even predicted the glass, the state would warrant a possible or probable rating. with respect to f, as in echo, no. f, as a process is defined as a peer review, and i understand that and that's, i don't have a problem with that peer review problem in this case is that's not, was, was done. nobody went back and verified the findings on the original studies. and

by failing to verify those findings, it cascaded through the entire review process, such that you don't have the answer which is based on the best science. how soon does he say important to me some that we have doing the proper independent assessment and that the according to the results of the be happy nessa, according to the regulations that focus on the use of the active assessments. and based on that, we generate the assessments regarding the independence from industry is clearing the legislation. i would say the 6 is the basic principle, the company that the ones to market something the you must pay for the assessment. so this by this happened that the by industry, there is no doubt the current process is scientifically floyd. it is time to have an independent panel assigned to evaluate the way in which the science is reviewed . there's a need for the regulatory agencies to re analyze the data, and there's a need to publicly publicly release all of the analyses and data to improve the

transparency of this process. these are not the actions of a company that has nothing to hide. this is not how you promote a product. this is that's actually proven safe. this is how you whitewash unfortunate and unprofitable facts. this is not by accident, but by design, and it serves monsanto very well, but it does not seem that it serves the public interest. thank you. the monsanto prepared certain documents for the registration and the s a report if you look at it has taken directly certain language from the monsanto documents and just placed it in the apps a report. so there's a lot of concern about whether f so really did an independent analysis or whether they just took the position to be against i or at monsanto's request. so that is not an independent assessment. how can we verify or expect that on the basis of such robust scions and i'm quoting industry, we can make

a decision. politicians in the end, you can make a decision to protect that people that if somebody you know has said hello to the industry at some stage in his life, that should not mean that that particular scientist should be banned from a panel. or, you know, research has been funded somewhere by someone, many of the scientists that have a lot of and a half now left the organization and their science panels because they have been accused of having worked with the industry. but since when does that make a scientist dishonest of the why? so having worked with the industry some years ago on the small projects, at some stage i did, i'm a scientist by training. and when i was in university, of course, i was looking for a grant to do my research, because some research can cost a lot of money. i was helped by industry. i haven't spoken to that particular industry now for for many, many years. it's been

a long time since i was in college. um, but that doesn't mean i'm dishonest as a scientist. the know you are students to be in the region where influence is very high and also regions look at your for it for regulation. and that's why it's so important that you are a piece regulation which is scientific, which is database in which as much as possible decides results being influenced by by i would say by noise or by

and just the emotions and fear the when science meets values and it's becoming complicated as we come with science, with evidence we do as a scientific process of risk assessment. but then this evidence is given on another stage on the policy levels. they are believes emotions, values come in. and what we see is a 40 additions don't like the outcome of our risk assessment. they don't question they, i believe they question the validity of the process. so basically if it's a comes with an opinion, let's say on the, on the continuing its in 60 sites,

what additional the lovely, if so they want the full as so you are protecting the bees, you're doing the right thing really going to act on that. so we all upload it to you, and it's the same process with the same people. use the same scrutiny. comes with the conclusion. let's say i'm glad for say, people say, i'm sorry, i don't like these outcome. so she would not say the type of say this, right? that'd be pretty safe. so if so must be corrupt. i find this very bizarre. the, you know, regulations is independent of corporate influence and, and it's everything is tested, actually tested. and with a lot of money and, and, and, and our authorities are looking at it independently. i don't know where these people have been living even in some of the mainstream, john, is you don't find reports that clearly explained that this is not happening. we are

seeing corporate culture not only in the sciences it sciences is one of the fields we see corporate capturing in every walk of life. the . i'd like to say it seems to be very highly charged. not because of the safety of dr for say, but because of g and because of monsanto because of international trade, maybe even because of inequality with global traits. supercharger assessments itemized. i guess it's been mostly for positive, 50 feet, then to facade, supposed to out and put in that opa done. yeah. and medium box models and see if it was to take your next directions,

at least event in people. soft support. this is rick is really awesome. thought, fill out the of course, if the science is works for the company, that's a different story. but i think we need to be a little bit more realistic about what it is we want. do we want the best scientists to assess the products to get to make sure they're safe? or do we want to make sure there's no conflict of interest? what does the objective is of the safety of the product? because of the conflict of interest of the, of the scientist, i think we need to be a bit more honest and trustworthy without falling into the mistake. so. so that's not something that we're looking for. i mean, the, the, the experts we use are as independent as possible, but i think also here it's not black or white. it's not serial or one that's not

the digital binary approach. we have to find the right balance between the best expertise. which means people that have done research, the people that are with both the feet in, in the scientific endeavor. and on the other hand, to make sure that there is no conflict of interest. and if i may say, or somebody i think europe needs to make a decision whether we know i think i stop here. yes. that's what leads to far too much, but they don't show us cafe. when people shook up, i'll see of it. then in this one, this problem i'm going to somebody talk to you on is a total of the villas, the left americans unit attempt to take a set that all the hung up on him for we and last you know,

once he left the finish on the best like and see this one. i see that on simply a little bit less but i, we have a local machine or banners, but i'm in total bill control. i can see that this one. let's get that off on it. let's go here. i don't know if that dollars, but if we is is the kind of thing that the company, that's the so yes, precautionary principle is and i scientific and it is. i think it's a big issue for europe and you called, i mean in general because it reduces the income, the willingness of sudden investment the there is a risk in registering and you participate. this is a risk. this is

a benefits. i'm a waiting to take this risk. yes or no, and the regulation today gives us an answer. if you look at the car of today, it is much safer then to call yesterday. you know, the 1st car that i drove in when i was a boy and my father was driving, had no safety built in the house. no, i had no airbag and now no abs and uh, and its z acom acre was not a murder. it is a car was like this and it was a very safe car for the time. and i'm not saying that the busy, so as of 1950. uh you know where fantastic. but by then there were very with bessie side. and then we just go over the house on the side effects and then the regulation. evils and regulation becomes more demanding and especially sides of bond or are withdrawn from the company. and that's no more that's normal. it will ition of any industry, the power of innovation doesn't come from the big companies. the big companies are

too big to be innovative anymore. they just want to preserve that present, that just but they're not innovating anymore. let me look at, look at the, the, the d i'm in the past. the sites were dealing with jim plant said we're develop 13 years ago. nothing has changed. it's b, t and other side resistance since the beginning it's old chemicals are so the innovation innovation is that we now have in addition to round the ready. busy and round it resist, implants, we have become a resistant trans am to for the resistant place. so we're getting an even more cocked toxic cocktail. it does. that's innovation. it has to get out. it just has to get benefits versus risk, right? what use a risk you're willing to accept on the varmint? even if it's very small, in order to have a safe and affordable to supply the,

to me, the defining factor in the future will also be around all acro fruit system. if we manage to get our, in my view, this functional aggregate foot system on a sound, environmental, economic, social, and economic basis. then we solved everything else will come from even climate change and these things health issues and our mental issues, social issues are collateral. they're all part of the, of this whole thing that is connected and the connect, the connecting, sent a piece is, is food. and how you produce the, because we see the world as it t's.

we are in fact, at the border age of the revolution. because human kind is able to do that, how much time that will take of how much the misery is that will create. i don't know, but that's i'm for me. you know, the reason the french writer co pay a hobby, he said this is a collie bri, i fair. so i'm just a little bird in the system doing my job as much like the in europe. we're not going to give off. we're not gonna. there are lots of other technologies, it's not just about gym or there are lots of other technologies coming off and the

companies are committed to invest in yourself as well. despite that, being so uncomfortable is a euphemism to work. in the challenges with the surprisingly maggie was still sitting 16 parts of the rock and we're still seeing day these on the storms in west, inside the beach to produce brief flash flooding. now the terms are coming down a little bit in the rock. the breeze is picking out which tends to make it

a bit of a difference. and it's getting fairly strongly down through society, picking up the dust and the sign to some degree. so all are still catching the edge of the bombs. so it is still green here in kuda. it's getting hot though to halt reduce the time they are in some places around the gulf. defies a place to protect. in fact, the next 3 days attempt, she does dropping down. but we start home at 4445, and 45 is reco. good. doesn't change very much this time of year in this part of the world. so it's awfully old. seabreeze will eventually see to that through jump class good. they've readings off by the coming side. there's not much to them at the moment. there's still something in the ground in nigeria, in chatter coast and south sea done. but to top the top not like many shows. they tend to say that we're trying to get to there and go to touched on sides of this because it's a generally dry picture. a few showers on the eastern side about the gasket, stormy weather, just off the eastern cape, internally, hot sunshine for most of the time,

particularly in box one to many degrees above normal, to the 16 years south of the 2008 global financial crisis. you've taken home more than $480000000.00. your companies now bankrupt. our economy is in the state of crisis. i have a very basic question for you. is this fair chunk plus people lost their homes in the us alone, but who was held responsible and caused the 1000000 to lose that job? the man who sold the world since its inception in 1961, the great fund has been supporting people's livelihoods, and over 100 countries, by funding projects in an array of sectors ranging from infrastructure to health and education. these initiatives ultimately help to

eradicate poverty and promote sustainable development the, [000:00:00;00] the hello, i'm maria. minimize the welcome to the news out life from dell coming up in the next 60 minutes, the deadliest day and a year for stuff at the u. n. agency for palestinian refugees 6 account and in his riley as strike on his school in central garza at least 30 people are confirmed dead in ne lights area following a damn collapse which has displaced more than

a 1000000 us bottles multiple natural disasters while flies rage in california while the hurricane in louisiana leaves the 10s of thousands without