sits again, denise persistent, soc is low equity, sorry, we can cut it small the on the 16th. if i'm from using social media around the strict new legislation in australia. but government says it's to protect children, but big tech companies on some human rights groups. say one word, one of the arguments of use, well, walk base is inside still the

hello and welcome to the program. i'm book and it's me a new lauren, australia binding social media useful and a 16 is one of the toughest dimensions of its kind. any what? it will holes company such as x, facebook take talk snapshot. i know those to stop teenagers signing up to the apps . most australians that support below, according to polling, but some social media experts say the o and as it should be on big tech. we should be more accountable for the content, but yeah, to rely on algorithms to hook uses by identifying that likes and dislikes, some studies, so young brains, more easily molded by what they see online. so one of the dangers and do children need protecting is up on like this, the way to do it. we'll explore these issues without guests in a moment. but 1st this report by kathy i lopez,

claudia. and it's being described as the toughest small. yes. to be in post on big tech, with australia passing the world's 1st age base, social media ban. the government says it's designed to safeguard childrens physical and mental health. we don't argue that it's implementation will be perfect, just like the alcohol band. full underwriting doesn't mean that someone underwriting, if it has excess, but we know that it's the right thing to do. the ban, which applies to all children under the age of 16, is fueling and international debate. since i struggle with mental health issues like anxiety, depression, i think it would make those a lot less than they already all and could really affects you know, my life. would you take it upon ourselves to regulate or personal social media usage rather than being forced off of it? restrictions on social media aren't new in france. miners under 15 require parental

consent to create accounts. germany, italy in belgium, have similar regulations and across the borders. debate about china owned take talk, have raised concerns for years. and certainly this law is also about tick tock and is can needed to be also seen. and these do political context in the us, some states are exploring limiting kids, social media exposure with some accusing big tech companies of using algorithms to deliberately target miners and increase their revenue. would you like now to apologize to the victims who have been harm, but you're not showing the pictures which at a congressional hearing about how social media companies haven't done enough to protect minors? metal c o, mark sucker berg apologize to parents earlier this year. questions about how to regulate social media joins have long congo over the industry. and they're getting louder. has the share of users who've never known life without it. gross. a lot of

the study and i like a, i wouldn't like it by my that in spain. i think that should have organized the demonstration because that's crazy. i. c, as in my life that your assumptive giants are pushing back against las really as new law, raising questions about freedom of speech and limiting access to information. but australia is a test case and other governments are likely to watch carefully to gauge its impact and how successfully it can be enforced. patsy a little bit, so the un, which is 0 for insights story. the lawyers meant to protect minus. so before we hear from a panel, we'll speak with a teenage john list leo. police see about how the move is being received by his peers. here is on the generally founded 6 news, australia. as you will know, i'm a bit younger than your average reporter, and as such, i'm still in high school shall go. i know,

along with about half of that team and lot with old school use. we have a school camp which goes for 4 days, 3 nights these choose. now, the only reason i bring this up is because on the count we cannot have any electronics to the intellect on that basically many, but i won't be available to report on user rights and look at your messages from tuesday to friday, not at all. i may have joined just now from melvin leo. you spoke to the joins select committee on social media and australian society about old base. would you be where you are today? if that was this social media bon in place a few years ago. thanks for having me. i know i wouldn't be where i am today with that. with that social media fan implies 16 use wouldn't existed if that social media batteries implies the realities we've been able to grow was a national streaming news general. why? having 3rd time, full time, 15 year old c, i would be passionate in general, is my media and join up. and i think you know, that would be

a real shame to lose if i, if i have to say so myself, we've been able to grow. so for my 6 years now, you know that could be as well sort of fee as old as you, as might know that some certainly wouldn't have been hands on. i think this been generally stifles creativity. if it was in place, how would your peers react to it? would they just get around it? would they find somewhere else? what would they, what would they do? well, i think young people are absolutely going to get around it. look, i've got a younger brother who's, who's 14 years old, and i'm, i'm sure he'll be spending the next 12 months cuz the implementation is not for another year. he'll spend the next 12 months figuring out how to get around to look . i think, you know, initially when this was proposed the, you know, some views all, maybe this will be a good idea. but when you look at the past few months, and the effect has been really rushed and gets back and forth on what platforms are going to be included, i guess there's a lot of, i guess, almost as laughing at just how rushed, explain by people who maybe don't understand social media, so definitely young people, again, a bypass this legislation for you all. and your last point that this is your,

well this is the well, you grew up in particular generations that do people twice your age and older. know what that talking about. you think in relation to this, i think something might be done, and i think that's a real problem. we have to have a lot of consultation with young people about a little that directly affects them. as you mentioned, i was lucky enough to speak to a joint select committee about this, but i think we need a lot more consultation yards. public submissions were on the open for 24 hours inquiry on the run for about 40 hours. this is really significant, legislation is different saying what the world is watching. that's absolutely true . so you have to get this right. you have to take it really slowly and you have to make sure it's done right. again, it's not even coming in for another 12 months, so i'm not particularly sure what the roches other than the fact that an early federal election next year or later populations. thanks very much for your time. last spring in august in melbourne, we have mach, andrea, which is a professor at manas university school of media film, and journalism. he's also

a specialist in implications of data mining, an online monitoring in new delhi. we have narrow box. yeah. cyber psychologist on the found of cyber b. a. p, an auntie cyber bullying campaign. in dublin, we have no in black, white like human rights lawyer. i mean, online safety coordinator for the children's rights. so alliance. welcome to you will. busy mock i'll, i'll stop with you. we just heard from leo, there in a pa, for making me feel very old. he doesn't think the people sort of my age. all right . you really know what we're talking about here. well, he may have a point to some extent, at least in terms of our experience with his platforms. i. the one thing that i think is really important is tied to some of the points that he made, which are also important. and the way in which this legislation was rushed in. and some of the concerns that have been raised about the implementation, i would add that it's important to think about the larger context of the platforms

that are being targeted. these are commercial platforms whose primary goal is not to encourage the creativity of young people or to provide them with safe spaces. it's part of their priority is to make money off of collecting as much detail information as they can about the users. and then using that to market and advertise to them. we know, for example, that there's been a history of companies facebook was found to have been doing research that indicated that it knew when young people were feeling inadequate or insecure. and they were actually sharing this information in with advertisers as something that they claimed that they were able to do. we know advertisers are interested in that information because that's what they trade on, in terms of trying to sell products. um, so i once upon a time we weren't quite concerned about exposing young people to funds of barrages of advertising. these platforms do this with the extra added charge of all of the

information they're able to collect. so i think it's important to think about that context when we imagine what type of spaces we want available for young people. i think it's really important spaces for communication and for tray trinity, but does it have to be this hyper commercialized spaces there? perhaps other alternatives, this type of legislation might make us think about the possibility of alternatives . know, lean astray is communication administer? michelle roland, she says, is about protecting young people, not punishing or isolating them not. seems like a fairly sensible approach to take, doesn't it? and i think that's a is a good one, and it's really important to remember the task boss. it cost is best legislation actually going to do. and i think mind you, if that's actually what you are doing is recognizing that social media companies as

a commercial organizations of selling product. do you have a duty and obligation to ensure that their project thursday, including say for children. but the way you make those products say, is owned by excluding children from their rice to be part of the origin, which we live there, rise to communicate the right to engage their right to cash information. you don't punish them by excluding them and you don't punish them and their parents by pushing the juicy on them. it seems to me that we would probably be talking about the same thing. how do you ensure that products that are being around for about 2030 years now? clearly they have been totally on regulation and they've allowed the, we've allowed those projects to become pipe a commercial to use at my, at terminology, which is really good. now we have to recognize for possibly doing we're regulation

for children. we're banning the children and young people. i'm not even all the children were standing children under 16. we are not giving them the opportunity to be part of the digital age of which we live. so b, bishop is right, and the ministers don't permission to keep children say, is a good one and a necessary one for government. but the method of binding children from the data from the words i would take, you should know it does actually it's actually even practically effective. marilyn in india with social media is, is as wildly popular is, is elsewhere. is it the, is this the wrong target as no lead might suggest too many times? no, i mean suggested the dentist spend that stick. 7 white books, maybe i'm a fellow opinion, but we haven't reached a point when we're looking at. so when a stringent measures like a back, we, what we need is a collective move my way of collecting people, deciding that this is not with for children and your children up that age group. if

they don't have access, then they don't seem that the missing out or big not being that oh, you know, i don't know about this is something like that. so if i look in the back of the collector moment, that it is the right time because young children do not really have the cognitive majority to understand what's in their best interest. and of course, we had only bad news social media app so that even our bands access to internet. so they're going to be most people out that options, appropriate good information can be shared by educators and by bed. and so it's not me that one of the laptops off that entire uh, this is the thing i really need, especially as a country like mine when the connection is becoming a big challenge. and the usage is very popular. we have a young nation where made up young population and a lot of detrimental effect is what we are seeing on the young population as to who those in spot number changes measure. i agree that i don't remember a 40 portals,

you know, better to do it, but i guess we can begin with that. so now we have the social media companies responsible to, you know, put in the measures. and can i also ask you narrow because to take talk, which might be one of the target apps has been bonded in the us since 2020, mainly because of the arrival between india and china. but how's that been any notable effect in the 4 years and stop bomb has been in place? so the, if you asked me if people are still using all the numbers that drastically new yes, that would be a very my 100 percent visual would be i don't know why or figure out the way around it. however, the intent is not just the, you know, issue with the china, but also the content. you know, the d as in the exposure to age in the appropriate context was also an issue. no, unfortunately, the bad austic dog was actually, you know, sort of dias by mid the instagram has speaking over. so i would say the long term

impact is last. but however, the band did see that the usage is very many months. and that's, that's why i believe in these kind of strangers measure when the time is right. and then the condition is becoming very difficult to, you know, actually demand or not can you help us understand what apps they are all straight and legislatures are an ops things are and i'm thinking of. and then what happens when all of the rocks inevitably a pay a years down the road? well it's, it's not clear. yeah, exactly which apps are going to fall within the band and which will be excluded? there's been a lot of reporting that suggests major commercial social media platforms like tick tock, ex medals facebook will fall within the band. there's been some discussion about youtube might be excluded from the band. in part because youtube is so heavily used in the educational sector, which is an interesting question itself,

i would suggest that the focus should be on those platforms that are the most aggressively commercialized and that are structured in ways that are designed precisely in order to get you know, get people to spend as much time as possible and manipulate them in ways that get them hooked on these platforms in order to serve ads to them. and in order to collect information to more effectively manipulate them. i think i think it's probably the commercial character that we should focus on more than the social character, although that that is not how the lock has been framed. but um, but when it comes to interpreting it, it's going to be interesting to see which of those platforms that are considered to be the ones that the parents and kids are most concerned about in their lives. so really interesting to see how the picture. all right, knowing these apps all that to make money at the end of the day issue, should we not somehow be putting the social media companies on notice that things

are going to change? yes, i'm, i'm fast really is prayer. it seems to me we can make our best effort is clear. we recognize that these are commercial companies that like to take another example from a different area. banks taking our money and they are regulation and required to keep its face. it's not perfect, but they're strong regulation happening in the area. we are at the very early stages of regulation, protect companies. they are not used to us, like near release as it is difficult, but shortly. but we should be to a is regulation and requiring them to produce face products like we do of other people who have commercial products that they sell, these should be safe, they should be safe for our children. and that is player. but it's hard to,

i mean basically it's just easier to explain. we're just finding this is not good for children necessarily. it's not recognizing that right. but usually it's easier regulation. it's hard to tell us main taking on the tech companies, but that's really going to be the ultimate solution. taking them on an ensuring gosh, if they make profit, they make profits on safe space. are nearly when they bonds tick tock in india, people went to to instagram, they went to snapshots of the apps, you comp put the genie back in the buffalo can you it's going to be very difficult . but the with the children, the advantage instead, because we are doing this collectively, they don't feel that they want to miss out when the doctor went out and it was for everybody like it was not for one particular community. and for a very long time before and you know youtube shots and instagram view scheman, which i like to call people who are living with it without doing so, i'm not to complain. so even with this bad,

i feel that it should not be that you know, now the advantage. so 10 popular big companies on these black falls. no good one should start streaming up, then you lose the purpose. so the idea is that yes, going back, maybe this is difficult, but we are not going back completely. we are only, i'm only focusing on the apps which are designed to be a victim in nature, which are, you know, of what a forward for us to build the profits. and then the when fans, well young people and that children. so only those are the ones which we at. i then define the internet to be on the safe, big, nice, pretty down treatments are better, so. yeah, that's right. that's all the age appropriate content can be reached out to them. mock, they are threatening. government said it when for this legislation, so on, but and the parents from the policing role, but shouldn't be prepared for the monitoring. what's going on, parents making the final decision. i think it probably should be

a collective effort to figure out how as a society we want to manage some of the concerns that we have um putting is i, i mean putting the illness on parents in terms of enforcement would obviously be i think the owners much $200.00 us with what we have now currently, of course is defacto parental regulation. uh, but uh, as has been suggested. there are network effects to these platforms. so if all, if a particular peer group are on and then you know, one child is told by their parents by the not we'd rather that you weren't on. if there's, if there's a fair amount of social pressure and some actually, you know, good reasons that kids can have to make the case. i, you know, i think part of the reasons for freedom legislation, the way it was is to address some of those network effects. um, so okay,

i think is, uh, you know, the point about regulation i think is a really important one. and one of the things that this legislation does is it kind of sends a signal to these platforms. you know, you can't just keep receiving the way you are. and i think there's, you know, the speed with which it was put into place reflects some political imperatives. but i also think it reflects the kind of collective frustration. but as a society has towards the power that these platforms have in the way, they seem to be acting in ways that although they serve a social function is not necessarily socially responsible. all right. okay, and they're all the, one of the capitalists with this legislation in australia was because he that because of a developmental stage, the teenagers are out particularly that, that brains help us understand why. what is different about a teenage is brain to walnut somebody a bit older and that'd be twenty's an older to seek children of and even teenagers

they are in the full matrix yours. their brain is not really deadlock to have that cognitive maturity responsibility box, right? none of that, and it is very, very important that at this point, we make sure that, you know, we take the right decisions, but they're also, it's actually french, it's the theater influence it, this better addictive behavior, which they are at the higher risk off. and these, back on them actually explain to this kind of, you know, but literally these integrated children. and that's where we need to take the stand . it's not that i'm sure like every other country because this is a global phenomenon. every country has reached out to the platforms off for regulations, but it's becoming challenging because of lack of response and the intent from that . and so some of them may need to begin with these kind of instances because like i said, the children are at the stage, the best to judge mental what's good for them. and hey, we as a does need to instill what's a very, very strong a and

a collective effort. so no lead generation is that was sort of talking about bullying from 1996 to to, to, to 2010 by of the 1st to grow up with asking to like asking to reach sweet taking cell phase, looking for validation from friends. it, there's clearly a lot of as evidenced. it seems that base is not a particularly healthy way to begin growing up, but should be some sort of way of managing that shall not. yeah. indeed are short. and i do hope if australia is going to go down this line, that's at the same time as we'll do a lot of work in helping parents and children to understand what the digital environment is like. how to readers, how to understand is how to managers in some ways. so bold as we recognize now, we don't have the situation we had at the turn of the century. we are 25 years on

so much is done online in our i that we have to have a generation. we don't totally know how to use social media. but who know how to stop using them, where there are boundaries where it's appropriate. we have done this with other aspects of life through all the generations. educators, caregivers, parents where it's appropriate and cool at sports clubs have worked with children to establish a reasonable boundaries between various things they should do. so 13 years ago at children where sneaking comics and books into school and they were being told they couldn't use them, is reasonable to say that you cannot use your social media when you're supposed to be doing your job or you're not. so these are things that you, we haven't done well either as a society. we haven't understood boundaries, we haven't understood how to be, bobby, about the digital world we live in. and that's going to be

a huge part of the answer as well. mock, if the young people are watching this program and scrolling and watching singleton easily, we pop these model products before have them we people said television would run the brain. we've old managed to survive them way. yeah, there is a long history as you suggest about regarding moral panics around new media when they're introduced. the question of whether this is a moral panic. it's an interesting one. certainly those people who are critical of the band are suggesting that it is when it comes to thinking about the forms of literacy that both parents and children need. i think it's obviously very important, but it's also important to have safety by design built into these systems. so, you know, you wouldn't tell somebody entering a house that they should have, you know, basic structural literacy in order to know if it's safe. we do expect

a certain spaces to be constructed safely, especially spaces that we and trust our children to. uh and uh, you know, regulation. one of the things that would be really important for it to do is to push these companies in the direction of building safety by design into the, into the platforms. right now. it's just not how it works. and, and again, i think, you know, this response reflects frustration over that fact. and they, raleigh, on to all brains. younger brains, perhaps more resilient to change than we might think too. yes they are, they have absolutely those again, it's the for to see that for younger mines, it's every single the fees they don't get to talk to that particular piece. so it, it was initially yes, because we are one of the draw something that they already have extra access to. that is going to be a little bit of assistance because collecting it will work very beautifully because no, not my feel like. ringback so i don't feel much. all right,

i love it. lastly with, you know, lane governments often want to be seen to be doing something. is this a government just wants to be seen to be doing something? oh, really? how long to evaluate? yeah, so, so there is undoubtedly that there is best sense of which this looks like a set of for bullets and every government, every politician is looking for the same for a bonus that for it they can say best way to keep our children say this. we keep your children's face. this is not the 5th. we happened to even start to talking about the practical way. you would implement something like this, but this is a way in which again, the focus is taken off. but the companies is taken off. the people who should be producing say, products, who should be designing, say, products, and who should be respecting children in those designs. it could even make it worse because now they've seen, they don't have to bother with say, projects for children in australia. all right,

thank you very much. that's the practical implications will have to be for another program. unfortunately, we're out of time. but thank you to all i guess to mock andrea of which to me raleigh box, you know, lean blackwell and also leo publicity. we spoke to us earlier and thank you too for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website alger 0 adult calm, the further discussion, go to our facebook page. that's facebook dot com, forward slash a inside story. you can also join the conversation on x, we all at a inside store for me, and it smith and the whole team here. by the asking questions. what does it need? so does good to you and solve the glasses. understanding the reality a pick on marginalized communities, how you blame that reporting from the action to may of i'm to them has always sat

that demonstrate to isn't very basic, right? and now you see many have to be tied up and arrested within latest global news. an insightful documentary, i'll just say it was teens across the world. when you closer to the concert, the story, not in america is a region of wonder. i'm joy, tragedy and yes of violet. but it doesn't matter where you are. you'll have to be able to relate to the human condition the i've been covering all of latin america for most of my career, but no country is a like. and it's my job defense life on how and why the

limits to have a dream contained to study in your own adventure now counter and waives the . and i'm sammy's a down and down. when i look at the headlines here now just there are now well positioned fighters in syria say they've advanced into the southern province of comma and government troops of withdrawn from the positions. the government though rejects those claims. president bush auto asset is vowing to defeat those he calls terrorist and i suppose is defensive marks the most significant development and serious civil war in recent years. so no cost, all know has been following the license developments from the border between took a and syria.