and we haven't had any for days. we must have a bible to fill it with. literally we haven't had a single drop of water for days and we are very grateful. because today we had something privately. i think most of the big organizations i've dealt with at least are taking a much more pragmatic and cautious approach. so money or putting energy into, to develop a kind of an, a i ethics statement and a set of guidelines for staff to try and make sure that they work within the parameters are established as acceptable. and so it's an interesting kind of juxtaposition. and it's also fair to say that as soon as you publish your a i ethic statements, there's a really good chance that you're gonna have to revisit that within just a couple of months. because the, i have a lease and, and respect sort of goes down. and so if you're going to pull back that curtain, let's do it in all areas where as many areas as possible, i don't think we want to get into a situation where half of the page on the article is just as, as a breakdown of all the different filters the different presets in light room, the different prompts that you use to format the text, or which which images and so forth and so forth. i think it's very good to have an

ethics and disclosure policy, but i think you have to go further than that and not just check the box, but actually go into and engage with your community and your audience and say, look, this is how these tools are use they are just tools, but at the end of the day as a journalist, the whole point is that what you put out into the public, you have to be able to stand by and defend. and what do you get that information from a freelance or a staff writer, a producer, or one of these tools? i think it's important to be very interesting example where you, you asked a question about a very contentious issue about gaza to a model. and you asked it in arabic and english and you had very different answers . can you share that story? that example with us? yeah, absolutely. so i mean, this is a classic case study, again of the nature of the data inputs that are going in and whether language alone can actually have a kind of an impact, but bias on his. so there was a question asking about a statement in relation to kaiser and the english language response came back with

a very pro western plastic american and positioning on us. and you have the arabic . and so it came back to, it was very, very profile us at the time when i should be invested in i to try and reach out to do so. so. so that was obviously around the episode where they cloned the mayor's. i don't even know if that is a term, but let's from for the purposes of this conversation, they, they, they put out the statements that sounded a lot like the mayor, but it wasn't the mayor. and i was to be honest, i was expecting a lot on that kind of situation, similar situations to come out of the us selections. and at least from here we can see that much. uh, why would you say the facts were not that popular? i would say in this particular race of the lighthouse as well,

i'd say in one part because it's just not necessary to mislead people. and in most cases, the technology is, as the documentary from the tail pointed out, much easier to access a used to. i mean, these things are not new, they're not novel issues that we're dealing with. photo and video manipulation, audio fakes and clones. yes, that is the right word, right parlance for these days. but in the past, you know, it took years or months, at least, of training and practice and education on how to use the various tools that allow you to manipulate these, these pieces of media. now it takes a couple of dollars of phone and some, some spare time and a maybe like, ultimately the future of any technology, especially, you know, in the current climate is tied to the future of capitalism and the way that these markets operate. i think there wouldn't be nearly as many complaints about copyright and stuff of content if these tools were created with public value and public benefit in mind, but they're not there created to a mass and extract the surplus value for

a small group of capitalists. and i think with regard to any kind of regulations, i completely agree we need them. i think there should be consumer and creative protections. i don't think that it should be a a labyrinth in mays to go turn off the a i training and scraping for every social media platform retroactively. and i think that the regulatory challenge, of course, especially at a global scale is going to be, i mean we've had mass consensus, the palestinian statehood should be a thing. but there are a few detractors that prevented from going forward. so global or mass appeal does not necessarily result in global or mass enforcement. so we need consumer protections. we need creative protections. we need to rest back control of the value of these and to localize the extra nowadays, and the impacts of them to the people who are creating them. and we need to reorient the way that we develop technology to benefit public, the members of the public, and the people who create the value. and not just allow it to be hoarded and the

plantation se gauntlet of the 6 workers and looking for a deacon to the ground, sifting through a soil and stones and was finally coffee. eggs make hurry to extract the precious metal. and this is the reward for hours of labor 2, maybe 2 and a half craps. coffee says finding gold has changed to slight inductive minneapolis . the sectors affords 4500000 gardeners because the sun.