he called her a terrible choice nonetheless, she went through largely with the support of republicans who wanted to make sure that donald trump got his nominees in however controversial. they are another controversial now many who advanced on a procedure boat was robert f. kennedy junior, who advanced as health secretary domini, there will be a final vote scheduled for him as well. john henry and l u 0. washington indian employment is done there and promote he has arrived in washington dc, added his meeting with us president donald trump. mode is the latest and a series of farm leaders set to meet with trump happen to negotiate better trade deals. deli has slash duties on high and motorcycles and to lead up to the visit. it's a boost, a harley davidson. the american manufacturer who struggles in india with points of republican hope raged on the campaign trail. canadian in 5 minutes of just intruder says he's country will have an extremely strong response to us tyrants. a 25 percent tax on the old steel and medium influence into the us is coming into effect

in march. canada is the biggest supply of both these products to those says the duties will cause job loss of the cost america and stifled its economic growth. donald trump is also threatened to separate 25 percent tariff and full canadian impulse. canada will respond as appropriate in a calibrated but extremely strong way, regardless of what the us moves forward with this be very clear the conversations around a 50 for the state or a non starter. it's never going to happen us, but we have to take seriously what the president is saying and full that into our thinking as we continue to stand up for canada. one of us trying to as launch as mining hubs is apparent for us severe tropical cycling set to make land full on friday are just as soccer and celia is likely to spring into category 5 wins as high as 290 kilometers on our port headland, it has been forced to close the head of

a storms arrival. it's one of the world's largest ports with transporting iron sounds. of people in taiwan and china had been celebrating the lantern festival. this traditionally held on the 16th day of the new new. yeah. $10000.00 loved times . i've been live in beijing to pray for good luck. going to happen. us in the new yeah. the festival box of a ton of spring. that's it for me down jordan. so now you kind of course find much more information on websites. i'll just say with the com that is on your screen. and you just continue is here and i'll just say are often all held up comments state you sound so much bye for now. the i've always known that my mother was mr. panama. that, you know, she's fabulous. now that i'm older, i realize that this isn't just a story about my mom. this is a story about my country. why in a country,

very 60 percent black country that was built by black people. why would anyone doubt that a black woman could represent the country? why is it panama? that is marketed to the world, the panama, that is reflected back to the panamanians. why is it so light skin? why is it so rich? and most importantly, how did we get here right now, a quarter of the world's population, 2000000000 people living in countries. in fact, according to the united nations 2023. so the highest number of active violet conflicts since world war 2. and according to those tracking, nutri emissions is on these across the globe, or a country. it'd be the full largest the me to call them on the impact of will however, is so much more than just emissions from the tanks ships. and it has

a devastating effect on people and a planet. so what is the scale of destruction will find military and in an age with nations justify war on the basis of suppose a security benefits is a honda model. so a huge threat to recollect the security, the or. busy whichever reports that comes out on the state of the climate, this little of the mission stuff, industry spewing more countries committing to a minute, less understanding emissions can help us work out what needs to change. but this would be coal in the information we have military emissions. these are often poorly tracked and even more poorly reported. and what's worse is the roof in

a countries most significant images. there's one military in particular, the biggest in fact with an $816000000000.00 budget in 2023 at leads the pact with emissions, the us armed forces, the government money or the seeing the operations is the us department of defense. the department of defense has annual emissions use as large as the emissions of many countries. so it says largest portugal or sweden in 2023. i spoke with net a crawford co director of brown universities costs of will project in 2019. her team uncovered a startling fact. the us department of defense has a large annual carbon footprint. in most countries on us to say the u. s. military emissions are $52000000.00 metric tons annually is to say the united states is the

single largest energy user, and the us military is therefore the single largest carbon emitter, looking at it as an institution. 30 percent of those emissions are from races across the world. and 70 percent or from operations, if you calculate us miniature emissions, it's more than many, many other countries. so it's really if the elephant in the room that has been ignored so far, that's nic buxton author and research of the interested in bass transnational institute. that was just a report showing that the ministry spending globally has reached $2.00 trillion now a and a warranty claim. and now and gaza has kind of given that next trip. and every time ministry spending increases, military emissions increases. getting clarity on emissions is a challenge. there are very few industries. let's see any upside in tracking, the carbon that they're putting out into the atmosphere. that reluctance seems multiplied many times over when it comes to military's getting accurate emissions.

he gets from them as prison, largely for utah in 2022, a good cold. the scientist for global responsibility estimated that altogether, miller trees and the supporting industries account for up to 6 percent of global issues. that's mold in civil aviation and shipping combined. why do you think this massive sol, so the emissions is so often ignored? is this deliberate or some kind of oversight? i think the reason why ministry missions it's really ignored on the plates was a fairly deliverance when the care to approach code was signed and agreed in the mid ninety's at the military comp time exemptions that they wouldn't be included. that was that something pushed through by the pension and us didn't sign the agreement to me and, but it remained on the books, the military and 1997 was very clear that they didn't want to have their operations curtailed and therefore didn't want military emissions, including the 2nd reason is there's vast amounts of military emissions or more

related emissions that we can't really at this point. count the cost of work calculations do not include the emissions from blowing things up from burning. that's kind of out of sight out of mind. at the core of the costs of war projects, calculations is few. the us armed forces requires a lot of it. we're talking more than 85000000 barrels for operations alone in 2017 keeping track of how many vehicles have gone to and fro. how long, how many times they've had to refill? that's the will not simple so that all terry's needs a way to get around. they require fuel and great power, like united states, which sees itself as pre eminent and wanting to prevail in every conflict desires, access to fuel everywhere all the time. so the united states has bases in about $38.00 countries and fuel is supply from those places or is taken to those places

and protected. so the united states can operate. i think i calculated once that one jackson and now uses for some average cost driver would use in 7 years intensive gas. so these jet thomas, the tank several very high fuel use vehicles. and then you've got a very large miniature footprint us as around $800.00 military bases around the world featured. those have to be supplied the results, and it supports the whole global machine which has a very high and common impact. but of course, the military's impact on the environment doesn't start with emissions, military forces and was, have listed largely devastating environmental legacy around the world. illegal login, which often flourishes as part of the war economy, remains one of the biggest contributors to deforestation and species around one 3rd of f kinda stands trees will last between 199-2005 explosives. damage critical infrastructure and can release particles, debris,

and talk systems that pollute the air, water, and swell and lead to sanitation crises. and example of the full out can be seen in 2017, in yemen, where a collapse of infrastructure led to around 2000 cases of color are being reported each day. part of war is involved in destroying the environmental capacities of nations. we saw that in a rock radio, the few fires that's happens. we're seeing it right now. and ukraine. one of the key targets is often fuel depot, so we had some changes around nuclear waste. it was a stock sheet that was talked, it is released, ammonia into the so odd of military impacts is that they leave a legacy of destruction. most famously we saw that in vietnam with age are in still affecting bus at dfcs, a decades later. we see it really stop to the right now in terms of, gosh, i say, you know, tennessee whole neighborhoods being raised to the ground. you're also seeing the use of toxic weapons such as white foss,

1st bands through the skin and leaves the toxic after effects was seen to shut down a fold sanitation facilities by through being palmed and also through the shuttle for black tricity. and of course, that's a release of toxic chemicals. so when you see belt buildings of bombs and that sometimes releases things like a specialist. and that's not occasionally emissions of course that coming from the use of weapons and ms. ailes. it's a combination of fast floors, past nuclear testing and fast operations, but also the current clean negligence in cleaning up following these operations. dr . my, what a u. d is a professor of political science and middle east politics at georgetown university in washington, dc. nuclear weapons that have taken place in the past, in the martian islands in the forties and the 50s, as well as in indian reservations, creating a lot of health. in fact, the 2nd thing is, there's also to be in fact the open air fits in countries such as iraq, afghanistan, syria, are practiced on

a storage. i mention is the water content solution because of their sales to in ground water. so using drinking and water for agriculture purposes, the situation is clearly unsustainable. in november 2022, the united nations formerly adopted principles to protect the environment a mixed on conflicts. and if you look at notice data, the us military submissions, whatever bits of it can be measured, have been on an overall decline since 1975. this is mostly due to a reduction in the number of bases and to move away from coal power to renewables. and you clear all of this? it started to happen even before february 2022. when the us army announced its 1st climate strategy amongst its priorities, installing independent power goods on the basis to improve self sufficiency and to use more renewable energy sources. also applying to have a fleet of electric known combat vehicles by 2035. there is, of course,

this new push for reducing fuel consumption and emissions as well as to transition to more efficient vehicles. this will make a difference. i think it's important, but even if they excel or it is a transition to renewables, the real savings is an operation. so then you have to ask, is united states operating in places where it needs to be operating? does it have basis where it needs to have bases or these a legacy of either the cold war or the post 911 wars? so these are questions that the united states military has not for the most part, evaluated. however, the military and government officials a quick to promote their environmental credentials. the same for her say 2021 is restore our. you'll hear about green was green miller trees and yes, even green munition. the best way to define it is it personally, is, is

a environmentally benign and munitions. the, the lead slog in the, in the tip of the bullet has been removed and replaced with a much more environmentally friendly material. you have to look on to meet the announcements to what's going on. and what you see is that not the, it's a concern, not about climate change, but about the funder ability that these groups have too few. or they find out during the rock for that one of the biggest funder abilities to us post is had that was the fact that only from a huge trend across depend on a massive amounts of fuel and deeds such. and it's in the rock near the if the touch oil tank is they could undermine the us or after that. so this being a real drive amongst us miniature reduced it's funny ability. it's always good to drink transition. just mean energy. if you can. the problem is we're talking about deep rooted, deep seated historical pollution, which continues to this day. so there's a need for deep structural change. over the past 2 decades,

west and governments from washington to camera have to use the lens of national security to view and framed the climate crisis. climate change is a national security issue. climate change at the center of our domestic national security. the impact of climate change on global security is not of absolute deep power months. the assumption underlying this framing seems simple and obvious. climate change will lead to increased instability, conflict, and migration that requires the tree readiness. this idea of the environment become a part of national security came after the end of the cold war, when suddenly there was the need to justify the budget. the, you know, viewed intelligence services within those large world procedures which suddenly were not faced with the threats of bipolar worlds. the biggest thing was the need to re define what security meant. and so they brought in the agenda to see was the environment is also part of security that led to the assumption from the

perspective of america, the west global north, that climate change in the rest of the world will in fact resources creating scarcity. and as a source of conflict and on rest for the western countries, another narrative just to say, this would create migration. and migration is potentially a source of on rest and conflict. and it's step energy for the past 1st nations. and that's the real problem with the national security threats. framing is that really it's time in those who are the victims of climate change. there's most impact to taking the course countries into now the new threats to the richest country, you never see it. how do we guarantee the security of people forced to beat the homes because of floods or increase temperatures? it's how can we secure ourselves again steve microns. and that to me is a toss of why i think we need to really challenge this idea of time and security and always ask the question. who security are we talking about? the other side of the debate? so i'm gonna say climate change has nothing taken seriously enough. so we need to

secure a sizes to bring awareness, to get the military on board to get the policy makers on board. and then we're able to have urgent action. that might sound like a smart strategy officer rule is the world and the respondents to threats and fear mongering and the see approach. people who take to raise a when the problem with this approach is that it means challenges a magnified when people are made into threats. and the rhetoric just rent something . climate change is a threat multiplier threat multiplier threat multipliers. threat to multiplies has famed much, much just one of the key terms. and this is the idea that climate change will exacerbate existing tensions and conflicts and make them worse. and i must admit, when i 1st looked at it, i thought the same, there was this idea that if you're in extreme circumstances, your goodness to like fight for survival, it's at the cost of every to step in science fiction. maybe we have watched the

part for the product. it's on site, but actually when you look at the evidence, it doesn't pain that picture. there's no reason to, in places of scarcity, that you might not actually find a thread to drive to actually cooperates in some parts of africa. for example, where there's been an increase impacts on pastoral communities. climate change to punch the line, to billions, to the brink of starvation that they've actually done had to collaborate and cooperate because they realize that that is the best chance of survival. but nevertheless, united states has looked to certain regions of places where those underlying weakness, darn middle capacity and preexisting stressors. like that's a conflict or a lack of democratic governance. and they say, these are the places were instability in migration will come. one example that

keeps coming up in this context is syria. in recent years, it's become common place to describe what's been happening for the past decade or so in the country as a crime. it's seen as a pre casa of the climate, conflicts to come. however, quite a total of just send researches not quite so assertive when talking about syria, because the syria there was a drought and they did have severe impacts and it caused people to migrate and that dropped was undoubtedly it was and by climate change. but they could find no evidence that those farm is what disproportion names involved in the civil war against the side. in fact, they found that the bigger impact was the removal of agricultural subsidies, which was a measure required by the mass. and but you went to a minute to general explaining the i mass for the war and serial. there was a shift to new liberal reforms under the encouragement of international financial institutions such as the world bank and the i met all of that combined, created

a situation of human and security for the communities and they ended up migrating to other parts. the other aspect is these migrants were not the one sticking the streets for the protest. and on the country they were parked in slums. did you neglect to buy local authority? and then were there any surviving? so the narrative is small, the different levels. and so that has to raise the question, if the time changes is a fact of a cleaning, it's not a climate change, more than why it should be news. i think it's because if we can turn every conflict that has the global impacts, such as the syrian more inter type of change, then we will need more resources for the ministry. and the often serves the interests of local dates as well because it will push more development funding and more 8 funding. so there's a whole bunch of cell 7 interest. it's a really driving this idea to kind of change core courses conflict more than actually the evidence. even the inch governmental panel on climate change. the i p . c. c in the united nations has been with we kind of jumped to climate conclusions

when analyzing conflicts. a report in 2022 states, violent conflict and separately migration patterns in the mid term will be driven by socio economic conditions and governance moved in by climate change. in other words, injustice and dictate has a most significant contributed to conflict and displacement. there is a valuable discussion investment about how to create an environment for peace, which is a field that doesn't get in any way at the same level of resources. resources that gotten into a minute tries response to the process. the one key areas investment against what i've seen is climate driven strips. a militarized board is in 2019 astrology. as defense falls announced that military patrols around australia is waters could be stepped up to intercept climate refugees. a report commissioned by the us pen to go on in 2003 on the security implications of climate

change. had this quite boldest will be strengthened around the country to hold back . unwanted stopping immigrants from the caribbean islands, mexico and south america. and in europe, politicians like jordan padilla, president of france, is far right, resumed a more national party. have said, boys will be the environment's greatest ally, it is true, then we will save the planet over the last 50 years. 63 rules have been built along borders or occupied territory across the world. in fact, 6 out of 10 people in the world live in a nation with one of these board awards. a lot of the migration is internal displacements. there's no migrant winning once duties. so there's also the assumption that they're dying to come to america or dine to come to the european union, know their floors for economic reasons for political reasons and, and sometimes environmental than the environmental, sort of, intertwined with the solution into political. and i think

a lot of these narratives are reading badges and they're kind of colonial and often racist attitudes. it's, that's the thoughts of savages are out there. and if there's any, suggest it to your impacts, then they will suffice. and they will effect are dramatic new video shows a struggle between border patrol and migrants and el paso. then you're starting to push away from looking at close is injustice to we need to find a way to deal with the consequences of it. and that for you turn to the ministry as the one who can deal with consequences, the actual match migration going from countries in the global south to the global north. this is a very small and it's so there's a big difference between the hyper on climate and migration and the reality. it's hard to escape the web security and discussions about the climate crisis. it's not just for the security, this food security, border security, energy security. ready ready no one can really argue with what, after all,

who doesn't want to be secure, and what a security isn't as benign or simple as it's often presented. often one course of people are made secure at the cost of another group security that could change the security we used in the context, not just of folders or resources, but if you i personally support the reference to human security and i would refer to it as climate human security uh to move away from the national security team, militarized, problematic framework. so there are different conceptions, security. the trouble is that the ones that would dominates are the ones i'm as result. and at the moment, what we've seen is a massive increase in ministry spending, the national security spending everywhere. so what happens then is that the national security idea dominate. it takes away the issues around distribution and justice and focuses them instead on increasing and defending an attraction occurring system. the power of the military security framing is so great

that those who question it can find themselves targeted with state and power level 3 bottles. for instance, in 2016 us law enforcement agents used to gas and water cannons. despite the low freezing temperatures, on, on, on demonstrate, is protesting the construction of the keystone oil pipeline, or native american land standing bulk in north dakota, governments around the world. i've also been proposing and even passing was that enables them to crack down active this branded as eco terrorists. poland days before hosting called 24 in december 2018 or thirties issued a terrorism over and denied entry to at least 13 for in climate activists. rich to, to attend cooling the security threats in the philippines, a new 2020 anti terrorism, who greatly expands the definition of terrorism to include those who intend to

damage public property, or interfere with critical infrastructure coming tactic of environmental groups. it also allow suspects to be arrested without warrant and detained that charges for up to $24.00 days and in australia, a stumped in early 2023, in which climate activist episodes from a traffic breach, sol, legislation ran through local parliament days later. that would increase funds for public obstruction from $750.00 to $50000.00 or 3 months in jail. when active this camp out in blockade roads for you know, struct, the construction of fossil fuel infrastructure. for the most part, they're not harming individuals directly. and on the other end, the government's responding pretty harshly. we can't in the name of protecting infrastructure that is actually harming us. the rest people are for town, their right to protest. that seems to be in instead of going to the values for

trying to, to promote and pretence. when we talk about the climate crisis, it's important that we separate rhetoric from reality. the corporate military industrial complex. as of then we're on it's messaging. throwing around was like front multiplies the national security imperative. there should be taken seriously, but not without a good dose of skepticism. they're a vested interest in the mix, and there's a lot of confiscation about the climate damage inflicted by military security system. so also we need to remember that the security framework is as much about attracting attention and money towards middle try solutions as it is about diverting focus from the time of you know, that kind of crisis copy results like guns. there's no way we can resolve the time of crisis through building pickles. therefore, we need approaches which are based on international collaboration. we need to look

at what is the root cause is of in security for people. and we need to find just ways to help them adapt to climate change. so it's a long whole. but to me that from past experiences, that's situations of crises can be dealt with quite different. and sometimes a crisis can bring out the best of people, rather than the west. the a full hails a planet, interrogates, well, i always think about climate change, the way to do this, the global issue, it's abstract. so whatever i do, it doesn't seem to make a dent. alley re reveals how with being and it created into distancing also from the climate crisis and delaying meaningful action. as faculty reactions have been both intentionally and unintentionally, quite a few ideas to create confusions. if we're confused with the power of psychology in blocking climate action on l g 0,

there is no channel that covers world news like we do as a rolling correspondence. i am constantly on the goals covering topics from politics, to environmental issues. like nothing, ever seen access to health care. what we want to know is how do these things affect people? we revisit places day, even when they're no international headlines. houses are really invested in that, and that's a privilege, as a journalist at the new democratic nations justified this kind of behaviors. collateral, the average has collateral damage. that's what we all team is leading to. what we're seeing that will allow me to push back for a moment is the newer system. corporate is real effective. it's global, standing from the impact to the us selections, the escalating conflict in the middle east. and the urgency of climate action upfront sets the stage for serious debate on out jersey or the

and i think they have to make peace that people have been killed and i think they have to make peace. yes, president donald trump says i see saw in ukraine could happen, but key will have to make concessions. the hello, i'm done. jordan, this is out as a licensed health insurance company. all right, so again, it's time to say because as the spot media just meet in colorado color sims, live in, see a video collapsing tucker's president worship typo on horizon packet stuff.