us secretary of state john us secretary of statejohn kerry has secretary of statejohn kerry has vented his frustration with israel. ina vented his frustration with israel. in a speech he said the decision by the un to condemn illegaljewish settle m e nts the un to condemn illegaljewish settlements on occupied land was in line with american values. he said it was about preserving the possibility of a two—state solution. the israeli prime minister said john kerry was biased against israel. he said he dealt with the issue of settle m e nts said he dealt with the issue of settlements and barely touched on palestinian opposition to a jewish state. german prosecutors have detained a ao—year—old tunisian man in relation to a truck attack which killed 12 and injured 50 at a christmas market in berlin. they say his number was found on the phone of anis amri, the man who drove the truck. it is reported from la that debbie reynolds, the mother of carrie fisher, has been taken to hospital. now on bbc is, it is time for hardtalk. welcome to hardtalk,

i am stephen sackur. imagine you are a patient about to undergo brain surgery. if it goes well it could save your life, if it goes wrong you could end up paralysed or dead. of course you want to believe your surgeon is infallible, a superhero, but he is not, he is all too human, just like you. and that simple truth emerges from the extraordinary honest writing of my guest today, one of britain's leading brain surgeons, henry marsh. he has given us rare insight into the mind of the doctor. is that reassuring or troubling? henry marsh, welcome to hardtalk.

thank you. the veryjob description, brain surgeon, for most people it prompts a sense of awe and maybe fear as well. and certainly mystery. but you have decided to lift the veil on what it is really like and i wonder why. i have been subject to that myth of brain surgery myself. i decided to become a neurosurgeon many years ago. i am the youngest of four and i have been drawing attention to myself from an early age. i wanted to convey that medicine is a very uncertain, imprecise business. when i became a doctor 35 years ago, doctors buried their mistakes. there was deference and trust.

doctors were not really held to account for what they did. that has changed profoundly, at least in this country. you cannot open the newspapers without seeing the latest medical scandal. it is the tabloid headlines that drive the politicians to believe mistakenly that they can change things in what is a very excellent health service. patients are not consumers, it's not like a shop. doctors are doing something in many ways much more difficult than what people realise. people think brain surgery is difficult technically. well, it is not actually. the really difficult thing is the decision—making and dealing with the patients and all the human problems that arise. i wanted to convey that. by conveying that and focusing on the difficulty and sometimes the fallibility of yourself and colleagues, isn't the danger that you plant a new and horrible seed of doubt in the patient? i do not think so.

if you had to go and see a doctor and you could only choose one quality, either steady hands, famous reputation, nice website, nice smile, we would all go with honesty. if you do dangerous surgery, which neurosurgery certainly is, the mistakes all arise in the decision—making. it is not about dropping something, it is not like that. occasionally purely manual errors occur, but it is very unusual. in my career, looking at my colleagues, it is in the decision—making where things go wrong. that is all about thinking and psychology. when you decided to go into brain surgery, you knew you were going to a field of medicine that came with enormous pressure. there aren't many branches

of medicine where anything you could do could lead to the most catastrophic... you become a surgeon because surgery is a blood sport in a way. that's what i say in my book. that is not inconsistent with caring for your patience. what is making it exciting is being worried your patient should do well. that's fine, but focussing on you. is it fair to say you have to have supreme confidence, maybe bordering on arrogance to become a brain surgeon? it is all about balance. absolute power corrupts absolutely. we have an enormous amount of power and it is easy to become arrogant. you need to be insensitive to some extent. this is a challenge of all medicine. it is visible and acute in something like brain surgery. finding the balance between compassion and detachment. the only ethic in medicine, some say, is we should only treat patients as we wish ourselves

or our family to be treated. but it is almost impossible. finding that balance between compassion and detachment is difficult. that's one element of it, but also self belief and self—doubt. it seems to me reading your book and other writings about the work you have done, as you have gained an experience and reputation, you have become more self doubtful. very much so. because i came to realise that once you master the technical skills of operating, where mistakes arise is in the decision—making. i believe now that other people are better at seeing my mistakes than i am. that is a divine truth that applies to all of us, we are very bad at seeing our own mistakes. you need the arrogance and self belief to do the operating, but it is critical you have a good

working relationship with your colleagues as well so they can criticise you and you can criticise them. that is difficult to get doctors to do. let's get specific and talk about a case that you have been very honest about. it's a troubling case. earlier in your career, there was a man in his late 50s who came to you with a huge brain tumour and you were appalled by it. appalled and excited. you said you'd never seen anything like it. he was sent off to see another consultant even more senior than you. he pushed it back to you and said, henry, you do it. it is a young man's operation. exactly. and you were quite excited. it was a dozen hours or more. it was longer than that and it went badly. you said to yourself, i could stop now, but i will get every single trace of this tumour

out and before you finished, you had accidentally severed a branch of an artery and the man never recovered. the mistake was not severing the artery, it was deciding to remove that last bit of tumour. how do you live with that? the answer is all neurosurgeons have terrible disasters and periods of despair. when i first became a consultant, my first few bad results i felt quite sick and miserable for weeks on end. you have to go on working. in a sense you accept it. has it changed the way you work? we have talked about confidence and self—doubt. you develop blinkers. you need to deceive yourself to some extent. one of the ironies of medicine is a lot of medicine is an act. very early on as a young doctor you learn the patient does not want the doctor to say,

i do not know what to do. we want our doctors to be experienced and confident. in my case, that is easy, because i am. but younger doctors are not. if you do not take on the difficult cases, how will you get better? you face an ethical problem from the moment you become a doctor, you have to start lying to patients. you have to pretend you are confident. you must deceive other people in order to deceive yourself. it is a necessary self—deception to help one cope. it is not a bad thing. as you get older, you can try to dispense with some of it and treat patients more as equals. i wondered with that incident and others like it, you are very honest, you went to a hospital that specialised in long—term care. i saw that patient years later. you operated on people

who were in essence brain damaged. i wonder what threshold of risk you are prepared to take changed over time? it goes up and down, is the answer. after the case you mentioned, i became over conservative. but it again reflected the working environment i was in 25 years ago. over the years, i discovered the way to do really difficult cases, they are very rare, so you only see a handful. when i was working in nepal recently we had a couple of cases like that. my colleague was on his own, he runs his own hospital. my colleague said, how wonderful of you to share an operation. a more collaborative way of working is very important in modern surgery. a thought, i wonder if it is more

difficult to take on the risk of a very difficult operation which you know has a serious risk of sometimes catastrophic consequences, but whether it is more difficult to tell a patient who is desperate for you, even though you have explained all of the risks, that it is not the right decision and it is right for nature to take its course, and you feel there is nothing more you can do for them. which is harder? it depends on the nature of the problem. i think it is harder to do nothing. do you? it is harder to say, go away and die. that is very difficult. sometimes you say it is the better outcome. yes, you learn with experience. i see my younger colleagues operating on cases which i did at that stage of my career which now i wouldn't. i no longer do emergency work, but when i was i was often called about emergencies.

emergency neurosurgery is actually very simple. it's not the lazy consultant refusing to get out of bed. the actual operating is very easy. it is based on moving blood clots. but the decision on whether it is worth operating is very difficult. you have strokes where if you do not operate they will die. if you do operate, they may survive, but they might be left disabled. it's like the roman games, if i say, thumbs up, operate, i get back to sleep. if i say thumbs down, i do not. there's a symmetry. is it important for you to get to know your patients before operating? i used to think it was. my son had a brain tumour when he was very young. he was a few months old.

i was doing general surgery. that is not why i became a brain surgeon myself. it gave me a certain understanding and sympathy of what my patients were going through. they say an essential part of the operating was to be quite close to the patients and their families. that is partly selfish. if you are close to them and things go wrong, they are less likely to lose trust in you. it is selfish and not selfish because you are more invested in the case emotionally. therefore it is more hurtful and damaging. in nepal my colleague and his team were doing all the talking because of the language barrier.

i was operating on patients i hadn't seen before and would scarcely see after. in the past it would have been complete anathema. it did not make a difference. i was just as focused and tense about the operating. that was a surprise to me. i was better than i expected. let me switch focus and talk to you about this most amazing organ of ours, the brain itself. it is so complex, it is so mysterious in many ways. and yet you approach it with sometimes drills, saws, knives and suckers and there is something quite bizarre about that. it is utterly bizarre. it is something, in a sense, when i was younger, i rather took for granted but, for various reasons, as i get older, i am more and more amazed by this fundamental mystery. everything you and i are thinking and feeling at the moment is electricochemistry.

it doesn't feel like electricochemistry. it feels free and insubstantial but we are the product of the electrical chemical activity of nerve cells. and although i'm a complete believr in science with a capital ","5 what is fascinating is that modern science... we cannot even begin to explain how thoughts and feelings, our consciousness arises we just do not know... your career has spanned 35 years or so, in brains — are you saying to me that in those 35 years you have learnt very little more about how the electrochemistry works? yes. how thought, consciousness... we now how a brick is made but it is not tell us anything about the house made by the bricks. so although there's a huge amount of neuroscience going on, what really interests us as human beings is ourselves, our feelings and consciousness. you can't experiment on it, you see, either. you write lyrically about this.

at one point you write about being struck, during an operation, that your sucker, as you call it, your kind of hoover thing that you suckjelly out of... you say, "my sucker is moving through thought itself, through emotion and that reason, memories and dreams should consist of this jelly is simply too strange to understand." it is the last great...the great mystery. my question is, how dare, how, literally, dare you suck out all of this jelly when you might be sucking out people's imaginations or thoughts or dreams! well, the answer to that is the illness you're trying to treat is even worse than the operation, so to speak. i mean, coming back to the question, how do surgeons cope with their bad results and complication? well, you think of the good results and you know that most of the time things go well. for all the poor patients who have not done well in my hands, there are, hopefully, made hundreds or even thousands who have. i think we know that's true.

that is what ultimately the balance is about. sure. but it is terribly important...maybe it's partly my personality.. but, you know, success is corrupting. success makes us complacent and spoils us. the worse surgical crime, for me, is complacency. i'm not saying...you mustn't dwell constantly on your complications — you must never forget them. you tend to forget them but it is terribly important to remain as humble and modest as you can even though you must present a more confident and assured outside to the patient. before we get back to practical matters of health care, one more question on the more philosophical side of what you do. you just said to me, "i'm a scientist. i believe in science with a capital s." but you know, for centuries, philosophers and scientific thinkers have posited the notion that, it the end, our mind, oursoul, maybe, is separate from the physical reality of this thing between our ears. are you telling me you absolutely are convinced there is no possibility of that being true? i think it is highly unlikely.

(laugh). one way to put it. deeply improbable. the brain is everything. we do not understand how it works and maybe we never will. i find that infinite mystery actually reassuring. we all know the macrocosm of the big bang — all this stuff recently about the anniversary of einstein's general relativity. each of us, with our own head, our own consciousness, is sitting on a mystery as great as the big bang. so...i‘m sure you have read the science papers that address near—death experiences and the notion that people credibly and under scientific conditions can recollect experiences they've had when normally the machinery has told us that they are brain dead. but you think it is a mirage? it is a complicated area. brain—dead is rather different. near—death experiences are a well recognised phenomenon ...pfft. .. but they come out of... back to healthcare. we have talked about

you as an individual doctor, surgeon and how you have approached a career dealing with the most terrible challenges in the brain. that's one part of what you do. another part of what you've done for years is exist within a vast health—care system, beeing one small cog component in a huge machine. it seems to me you have become disillusioned with that machine? yes and no. you have to look at the nhs internationally, firstly and if you look... there is a lot of criticism in england about the nhs. you can't read the newspapers without them saying, you know some mistake in a hospital. and the headlines say, "shame the nhs." that it's the responsibility of the nhs. the national health service provides, by international standards, very good healthcare in terms of overall outcomes in life expectancy... the americans would call it socialist healthcare...

passionate! passionate in socialized healthcare. i have worked and visited so many countries where medicine is commercial and it is terrible... it is not if you can pay for it. it comes back to the fact that medicine is not like going into a shop and buying something. the patients, a, are not in a good position tojudge what's good for them. b, a lot of the decision—making is very unclear and very grey. if you look at countries like america — sure, at its best it is fantastic — but it is incredibly extravagant. in all countries, healthcare costs are rocketing above the rate of inflation. i'm afraid if doctors have a financial interest in what they are doing, they tend to do more and a lot of it is unnecessary. taking british case of a socialised system which is free at the point of delivery, politicians have to be more honest that at a time of rising healthcare costs and an ageing population, politicians need to say to people, you can have this system... ..but you need to pay more.

pay more tax or accept greater rationing. exactly. it is basic economics. if you have a good which is free at the point od delivery but is in scarce supply, you end up with queues. having all these targets, introduced by the previous government, can becounterproductive. you think queues are ok? no, i don't think they're ok. but you have to prioritise and deal with the emergencies first. if you give equal priority on urgent cases, the emergency work suffers. a lot of people have made points about the organisation, and you call it the chaos, in the system. but it seems to me there's another interesting point about you and it comes back to the word i used earlier, arrogance. yes. you do not like being told what to do by managers. exactly. you do not like being told to can't wear a tie or a wristwatch, you get angry that your car park has been taken... i do not drive a car i ride a bicycle everywhere so i don't have that particular problem.

you are right. some of the reviewers of my book comment on my arrogance but, again, that criticism is probably fair to some extent but there is this fundamental tension in medicine what patients want... they want individual care from a doctor. they want a sense of personal responsibility from an individual. as a doctor, most of us have this overwhelming sense of personal responsibility for our patients and for their lives and their death. if you are treated as just another minor cog in the machine, it produces a lot of tension. psychologists will say many times one of the most stressful situations — lab rats or human beings — to have a position of responsibility with no power. and that's very stressful. you have escaped the confines of nhs. a lot of your work is done abroad abroad — ukraine, nepal. i want to end by asking you this, having worked for so long with sick people, with terrible health challenges of the brain, are you now frightened of your brain and deterioration? oh, yes, i am.

most of us have had one or two demented parents to care for. dementia is an increasing problem in wealthy countries and it bothers me greatly. i much more worried about dementia than dying. the evidence is fairly clear that keeping busy, physical exercise, are very important to keep it bay but we cannot keep old age at bay, ultimately. you are committed to keeping on doctoring. you said an ageing doctor is a better doctor because if the wheels start to fall off you have more empathy. you are more sympathetic, yes. having said that, you need to know when to stop. everything in life has a life itself. best to leave too early rather than too late. we began by talking about... i'm not ready to stop yet.. we began by talking about whether you wanted an honest doctor or a doctor with a steady hand. i mean, i don't wish to be sort of rude but,

as you age, as i age, your hand gets a bit unsteady, your eyesite isn't quite so good. do you think about these things? i have been thinking about it quite a lot when i was operating in nepal — i was mainly there to teach but i ended up doing a lot of major operating, more than i would do in this country, in fact — and i felt two things. one, i was pretty sure that purely manually i was as good as i was. my operating is done with a microscope so eyesite isn't an issue. but i felt increasingly ashamed and embarrassed at how crude the operating i was doing was compared to what i increasingly understand about the brain. it's from neuroscience books not from neurosurgical medicine. that struck me. i need to gradually withdraw from operating, clearly but not yet. not yet, please. i hope you keep going for quite sometime.

i still totally in love with it. dr henry marsh, it has been a pleasure. thank you. thank you very much indeed. we've got a lot of fog out there, thick fog. it's quite patchy, which makes it dangerous as well. and on top of that, we've got sub—zero temperatures. so that combination means freezing fog in some areas, and that, in turn, means that the roads could be some quite slippery. so really quite dangerous on some of those roads, if you are travelling in the early hours, and really throughout much of the morning, into the afternoon, because that fog will be

stubborn to clear. this time of year, when there is no wind, the sun is low on the horizon, just can't work on that fog, it cannot melt it, as we say, away. this is what it looks like at 8:00am in the morning. you can see fog extensive across england, also the near continent there. temperatures down to —3 in some areas. now, the further north you go, we've got a bit more of a breeze coming off the atlantic here. so that means that that fog can't form, and there are also bits and pieces of light rain. fog doesn't like the rain, too. so for the western isles in the highlands, i think fog—free, fog—free for northern ireland. but here across the bulk of england, at the very least it will be sort of cloudy, misty, a bit of brightness, and in one or two areas that fog is going to persist. now, in terms of the temperatures, for most of us, actually quite a chilly day. three orfour degrees. warm spot there, tropical in stornoway, ii celsius. we've got the wind in the rain, so it's not ideal. let's focus on that fog, because i have said that it may

stick around into the afternoon. these sorts of areas here, where it does stick around, the temperatures of course struggle. we haven't got the sunshine coming in. warming up the ground, so it is zero degrees celsius. so thursday night, so this is the following night now, a bit more of a breeze across the uk. these isobars here, the pressure lines, mean there is more of wind. so that means that the fog isn't going to be quite so widespread into friday morning and friday afternoon, maybe, across the south—east. i think for many of us it is sort of a cloudy—ish sort of day, with some sunshine. notice that there is some rain getting into the far north of the uk. this is new year's eve, weather front moving into northern ireland, scotland, the far north of england too. to the south of that, probably staying dry. temperatures just about into double figures the south—west, and south—westerlies across europe. actually, the bulk of the continent probably hovering close to freezing during the course of new year's eve. but look at that, london is actually going to be warmer than madrid

on new year's eve. now, something does happen as we go into 2017. the thinking is that a cold front, a pretty good cold front, will sweep across the uk, and introduce these northerly winds. so i think i january 2017 is going to feel pretty nippy across the uk. welcome to bbc news. my name's mike embley. our top stories: the united nations underfire. when you see the un solving problems, they don't. if it lives up to the potential it's a great thing and if it doesn't it's a waste of time. us secretary of statejohn kerry says israeli settlement building in the west bank threatens hopes for peace in the middle east. israel's accused him of bias. police in germany detain a tunisian man, in connection with last week's berlin truck attack. and out with the old: new yorkers say good riddance to the worst of 2016.