day on wednesday, further wintry showers dotted around and called again to start the day on thursday. this is bbc news with martine croxall. we'll be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers in a moment. first the headlines. the plight of the civilians of western mosul in iraq — survivors of islamic state now in desperate need of aid. a man has been arrested in east london on suspicion of murdering a one—year—old boy and attempting to murder his twin sister. north korea's leader is celebrating a successful rocket test, but the launch has stoked tensions across the region. george osborne's latest job as the editor of the london evening standard has led to calls for a rethink of parliamentary rules. it means the former chancellor now has five roles as well as his job as an mp. # deep down only zero down in new orleans... tubs; has filed at. tfieagéfiffii:

father of rock and roll. remembered as a founding at you couldn't see it, but chuck berry caused a little shimmy on one side of the table at! lucy fisher, correspondent for the times, and star of the latest papers trail, and eve pollard,. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. tomorrow's front pages. the ft leads with a report on a uk—germany defence cooperation deal. "the prime minister is seeking to emphasise britain's contribution to european security in a bid to bolster post—brexit solidarity, " the paper says. of famine in parts of africa. the paper has launched an appeal to help thousands of victims. the daily express has

a report on the treasury sgnsiésfins a graffiti; set. " "' " " " " "' the paper says the "tax raid" is to raise funds after the chancellor's u—turn on national insurance increases. the mét’ra’is leading’wdii "a repu'r on the death of a toddler in london. and the remote—controlled ‘flying squad' makes the daily mail's front page — the paper reports that the first 24—hour police drone unit is to be launched this summer to to chase criminals. and the guardian talks about trump and the wiretapping claims. so, let's begin. a remote—controlled flying squad to chase criminals and hunt for missing people,

21st—ce ntu ry hunt for missing people, 21st—century sweeney todd. hunt for missing people, 21st-century sweeney todd. boys on their toys, what can we say? devon and dorset, that part of the world, and dorset that part of the world ! they and dorset that part of the world e they are thinking of are saying they are thinking of getting drones because that can help them look for people who are lost, in trouble, and i can understand that. how you can utilise a drone in the middle of a burglary, i'm not entirely sure, but the dangerous thing is they are saying you can't get all these trends, and they are not a get all these trends, and they are nota bargain, get all these trends, and they are not a bargain, by the way, but it is the sort of money that chaps like to spend, and cut down on the police force, cut down on bobbies on the beat and all the rest of it. i'm sure that § be the argument. i'm sure that will be the argument. i'm sure that will be the argument. i'm sure drones can do useful things, sure drones can do useful things.,. ., e, for people on beachy head looking for people on beachy head all that sort of thing. the idea that drones can guard people, and a p pa re ntly that drones can guard people, and apparently they guarded the duchess of cambridge recently. wales. apparently they guarded the duchess

of cambridge recently l wales. they of cambridge recently in wales. they must have a recording facilities so that they concede if a crime is in that they cencede if a crimeieie middle of commission of a crime, the middle of commission of a crime, but there are privacy concerns for some people. and you'd have to be very lucky to have a drone up in the right at the very lucky to have a drone up in the right- at the right time. very lucky to have a drone up in the right - at the right timeli there are big privacy issues think there are big privacy issues with this, particularly when it is allied with new technologies. the russian state is pioneering technology that can recognise every single face. if you link to that this, then anyone walking down a street, you could in point their location, and that is quite concerning. they say they will use it for marches and all the rest of it, which on the one hand makes you feel scared for your privacy, but on the other hand - might save time the other hand you might save time if trouble makers were known. a close eye must be kept on the cost, as the public sector has a poor record of getting value for money. you can imagine the latest drones.

they can move at 40 miles an hour at 100 feet, they cost £1000. how'd you get it back? remote-control. they are very skilled, people who use them. there does seem to l are very skilled, people who use them. there does seem to be a human element that may be missing. that might be part of the issue, if they are having to reduce police numbers. the financial times, ‘ii after the the financial times, life after the european of the financial times, life after the european - of justice, the financial times, life after the european - ofjustice, which is european court ofjustice, which is currently the place at which cases

end up because we are inside the european union, that will change, the supreme court here will be the first place that cases are referred to. i find it extraordinary that liz truss has said tojudges, come out and explain to the public what you do after she was attacked for failing to stand up for the when the daily mail enemies daily mail enemies ofaily mail enemies of the mail enemies of the people over branded enemies of the people over the article 50 challenge which they presided over purely on a legal basis whether parliament needed, the basis whether parliament neededethe of parliament needed to be approval of parliament needed to be sought to trigger to call 50, sol think it is a little bit, there will be judges choking on their cornfla kes be judges choking on their cornflakes tomorrow morning when they see the justice secretary that. i think it is quite a saying that. i think it is quite a superficial, cheap thing to say. there is nothing more complex than law, and it is for the education sector to explain the rule of law

is, separation of powers. the other issue as well is that as lord chancellor, she has a legal obligation, she has sworn an oath to defend the independence of the judiciary. she was criticised for being very slow to come out and say not very much after those attacks in the press. and judges i not very much after those attacks in the press. andjudges i know, they would run a mile, ithink the press. andjudges i know, they would run a mile, i think from sitting down and doing an interview with a journalist. all their training has been be above it, don't get down and dirty, just get on with your as get down and dirty, just get on with your. as per the law says. and i yourjob as per the law says. and i think the politicisation of the judiciary as you have in the us is highly undesirable. it would be a bad thing for british society to see that come here. it would. and there should be more femalejudges, i would like to say that. wouldn't it be helpful if in some we, the

general public, who never come into contact with the courts as to, understood how it fitted altogether, the role that the supreme court will the role that’hteismegfilfilcfiflftififiu: have on the fact that it is supposed to be above politics. it is, and what was so curious about the whole situation was that nobody had ever said to david cameron, i presume, you do understand that this will have to go through parliament as well? a lot of mps didn't seem to that! in the old days, understand that! in the old days, you did civic studies at school, but that has been dropped from the curriculum, and i think a lot of people don't understand. if you 7.7 people don't understand. if you fjf come into 7, people don't understand. if you g come into contact people don't understand. if you 7§772 come into contact with people don't understand. if you 2; come into contact with the don't come into contact with the law, which is the best way to be, those of us who recognise notepaper from lawyers upside down when they get to their desks as an editor

does, it is good to be educated about who comes from where and how about who comes from—where rand—how! works, but i'm not sure that it works, but i'm not sure that judges should be the ones to do that. i agree with you. and liz truss has said, you are going to come in for more attacks, so you will have to defend yourselves. so manyjudges go will have to defend yourselves. so many judges go into will have to defend yourselves. so manyjudges go into it because they have earned a lot of money being barristers and lawyers, they go and do it for less money and they are now going to be attacked, that makes it seem