leaving him in a critical condition. we believe it is a hate crime. prior to the attack taking place, the young person was asked where they were from. when they said that they were an asylum seeker, that is when that frenzied attack took place. research says that nearly half the people who used the government help—to—buy scheme to purchase a house did not need it. hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are anne ashworth, who's the associate editor at the times, and bonnie greer, playwright and writer for the new european. very glad you have hung around for the next review. i would be no good on my own. tomorrow's front pages.

the mail on sunday continues its campaign against videos on google and youtube which show violent or terror related content. tomorrow's story highlights a video showing how to penetrate a stab vest. britain's airports and nuclear power stations need to tighten their defences against terrorist attacks, according to a story on the sunday telegraph's front page. british passports could soon be returning to theirformer dark blue livery following brexit, according to the sunday express. the sunday times headlines the news that some peers are claiming thousands of pounds worth of expenses for attending the house of lords, despite making little contribution to debates or committees. and the observer highlights pressures being put on the government by some cross—party mps who want to guarantee that eu nationals would still be able to work in the nhs after brexit. several brexit — related stories on the front pages. we will begin with the front pages. we will begin with the observer, nhs recruits given

special status after brexit. this is a cross—party group. special status after brexit. this is a cross-party group. it is very logical. i don't know why the government doesn't model the society, why it doesn't make a model of the nhs without eu national is not without immigrants. let the people see it. then we can understand the challenge, as opposed to making stories about the problems. it is a simple thing to do. let's see it, let's see how long it will take you have national strength up to staff the nhs that we need, and let's see the gap in between. that is the reality. these stories are important but they don't move a long, they don't get us anywhere. there is an urgency about this. it seems as if eu nationals in the nhs are going home more than in the nhs are going home more than in the past. they are giving up.

thinking they won't have a future in the nhs. it is interesting. all of the nhs. it is interesting. all of the debate about eu migrants has focused on hospitality. their biggest contribution is to the nhs. exactly. it makes you wonder why this simple modelling isn't done. why are people debating something thatis why are people debating something that is easy to do? we can find out the gap. we can make a policy about the gap. we can make a policy about the gap. we can make a policy about the gap. it could be part of the negotiations. everyone throwing up their hands saying it will be horrible. it is easy to know. is it necessary to have negotiations? car not the government say, we need them. —— cannot the government say. it is about people being told about immigration, if you do something logical, we need these people, it affects the political question. the government is balancing both of these things at the same time. then

you have stories like this. we have a numberof you have stories like this. we have a number of issues jostling you have stories like this. we have a number of issuesjostling for prominence in the brexit negotiation. remember, an awful lot of people voted to come out of europe because they thought that there would be an immediate cash injection into the nhs. now, imagine the dismay if the nhs is dismantled when these — if these people are forced to go home. i think it is a simple thing. if they want to do it, thatis simple thing. if they want to do it, that is the issue which perplexes me. show people what it looks like. it is not difficult. we have the tools to do that. there is another nhs story not to do with brexit on the sunday times. nhs threatens gps with closure, this is incorrect, with closure, this is incorrect, with the cost of renting property to runa with the cost of renting property to run a surgery from with the cost of renting property to run a surgery from the nhs. with the cost of renting property to run a surgery from the nhsw with the cost of renting property to run a surgery from the nhs. it seems as if the nhs is a landlord to some nhs surgeries. so you have your gp surgery nhs surgeries. so you have your gp surgery and your landlord is the

nhs. there has been more money put into a transformation in technology and it is putting up the cost of the service charges and there is going to bea service charges and there is going to be a rebellion over this.|j service charges and there is going to be a rebellion over this. i would imagine that there is a generation of doctors and medical people, nurses within the nhs, who think this is absurd. that is basically it. you mean, we will get kicked out because we are not paying your rent? when this surgery is what it is about, not the building. you should be helping us to stay here as opposed to giving us a bill for rent. it doesn't make sense. this is not the point and it might be simplistic, can't you move somewhere cheaper and have a different landlord, or by the building themselves? the technology required as part of the gp role. it is movable, isn't it? you have people who have a client base, maybe they can't move. maybe they can't find

premises. i am a london. can't move. maybe they can't find premises. iam a london. it can't move. maybe they can't find premises. i am a london. it is not easy to find a place. people cannot just move because they cannot pay the rent. i think people probably wouldn't know that they were paying rent to the nhs. it was news to me. it has been a story that has been bubbling under the medical press and is beginning to get national prominence. exactly. and it is also theissue prominence. exactly. and it is also the issue with the nhs. a lot of us don't know how much it has become privatised. and how much it is being privatised. and how much it is being privatised. that is not to do with privatisation, if the nhs owns the building. it is a landlord- tenant tussle. the internal market. it is privatisation by other means. other people might argue that is not the case. well, it is. let's not get bogged down. ok. the times, £20 toxic tax for diesel drivers. not

long ago we were advised that diesel was a clean option. and now we worry about what to do with the diesel cars. it will be too expensive for people to drive. we were trying to do the sums outside, with the congestion charge and other penalties to drive certain cars before 2006, plus the £20 toxin attacks in london and other cities, it might be as much as £40 a day to drive a car in london and some other cities. it would get you onto the train, wouldn't it, or public transport. heaven help us. i live a couple of streets from here and it is bad at ten o'clock. there are areas in london that have already hit their yearly pollution level. they hit it into ready for hours. this is extremely serious. i think siddique khan is trying to do something about it in london because it cannot go on like this ——. something about it in london because

it cannot go on like this --. this is andrea leadsom's mission? yes. he is andrea leadsom's mission? yes. he is one of the drivers. let's have a look at the mail on sunday, a campaign on what gets shown on the websites platforms like google and youtube. google blood money, cashing in on five video showing how to pierce a stab vest, like one worn by the police officer who was murdered in the westminster terror attack. without going into too much detail... it is highly unpleasant, shot by some weapons enthusiast, a german guy, about how to penetrate a sta b german guy, about how to penetrate a stab vest. let's hope it is not still on youtube after it has been on the front of the mail on sunday. he is making money from exhibiting that video. it isjust he is making money from exhibiting that video. it is just yet another — feeding into all of this. we have allowed google to rule over us in

allowed google to rule over us in all of its manifestations without check. google rules over us. they agree with you again. you're absolutely right. problem is that google is born in the first amendment culture. that is their culture as a company. the issue becomes how to regulate — how can you regulate this behemoth and their ideas about expression, how can you do that in a culture like the uk which regulates what people say, which regulates what people say, which regulates what goes on air? that is the issue. the pressure is mounting on this country. it is —— company. it is a publisher. it doesn't even pay the tax it was supposed to pay. google, google - it is not illegal but let's not get into the tax story. this article makes the point that you said it had permanently removed these videos. ——

youtube said. it did not reveal how much money was made from them. a spokeswoman said we have cleared policies against inciting violence and harmful or dangerous activities and harmful or dangerous activities and remove content that breaks guidelines when we are made aware of it. -- guidelines when we are made aware of it. —— clear. that is the same as google. they will take down material. who is meant to police it? well, again, this culture is a first amendment culture. how can google adapt itself to this territory? how can this territory adapt itself to google? that is the issue. and that is the wall that we are coming up against. we go next to the sunday telegraph, airports and nuclear power stations on terror alert. and we knew that not long ago restrictions were in place for taking types of devices on board planes from certain places. and even

then some holes were found in that security system. this is a wider issue to do with notjust airports, as the headlines has, but nuclear power stations. it will come to the point where isis, i call it daesh, it will get to the point where they can understand and get these entities, these machines, themselves in their possession and build systems that would counter them. that is something that was always going to happen. so, the issue now is how to get up to speed to be faster than they are. that is what they are doing. their onlyjob is to win this. so they can take a machine, take it back to isis hiding hole, wherever they are, and build something that counters it. this one i think they are putting in the battery of the computer it self the bomb. getting them on board the plane. yes. and in watches. this

huge technical know— how. plane. yes. and in watches. this huge technical know—how. and their strongholds are under threat. they have to look too different ways to keep and maintain the terror attacks. well, they are the electronic caliphate now, they don't have any territory. this was always going to be a battle of hearts and minds at the end of the day. the technology — it is a race. minds at the end of the day. the technology - it is a race. let's stay with the sunday telegraph. how the cabinet plotted to exploit eu defence fears. we soon found out about it, didn't we? it was on the headlines around the world. the idea that because of the importance of britain sharing intelligence and the security of the eu, that it would be a powerful piece of leverage in the talks. it isjust extraordinary, isn't it, just all of the different issues jostling isn't it, just all of the different issuesjostling for isn't it, just all of the different issues jostling for what is going to be the most important thing. is it

people, is it defence? you know, we have a good name in defence in the eu, you know, this is where we have our strength, and it probably is legitimate to use as a bargaining tool. but donald tusk stood up and said he didn't even believe theresa may actually used security as a bargaining tool. he said he can't believe she did it and he totally dismissed the fact that she might have done. this story says this was discussed. she was a former home secretary. exactly. she made the point in the run—up to the referendum that security was an important part of the two operation with the eu. would she sacrifice that? i suppose it was - will you put that on the table? you are going to share intelligence if we don't do what you say? that is how it is. we are still in nato. not only that, a lot of other things, and we are a

leader in defence, a round—the—world and in the eu, and it is quite frightening, actually —— around the world. and what is also surprising is people didn't think that there would be pushed back about it. because headlines around the world we re because headlines around the world were basically, what the heck, that the uk would put it on the table. more brexit stories on the express, wi—fi on the trip to the dentist, and things we have to pay for in this £50 billion except bill, including polish roads, rail routes and dentists in bulgaria. all of the stuff we have to pick up the tab for after we leave including projects that have not even begun. but we did agree to help fund them because they we re agree to help fund them because they were still in. it is a contract. it is so cut and dry. they are able to deduct... is it cut and dry? yes. i think everything is up for argument. let me put it this way, the way they

came up with a £60 billion, 60 billion euros thing or whatever, they deducted certain things that they deducted certain things that the uk promised to do and it came out to 60 billion euros. now, whether that is going to be paid is another thing. it is not hard to find out what it is. it is a list. it is there. it does exist. it is all a lot of creative accounting going on. there are numbers all across these stories and you think, really, is it the full truth of what we have to pay? and whether we will have to pay for some of the other projects that it has already committed to pay for. if anyone thinks it will be clean, done and dusted... and that it will last two years. someone says, signed the cheque and then we will talk. finally, the fun of the sunday express, true blue passport reborn. a p pa re ntly express, true blue passport reborn. apparently the iconic dark blue