Skip to main content

tv   HAR Dtalk  BBC News  July 24, 2017 4:30am-5:01am BST

4:30 am
whose vehicle was found in a walmart car park with eight people dead in the back of it. a ninth person later died in hospital. around 30 others had been locked in the truck in sweltering heat without water or air conditioning. there's been a shooting incident close to the israeli embassy in thejordanian capital, amman. local police said twojordanian men were killed and two others injured, one of them an israeli. the shooting took place at a residence in the embassy compound. a major clean—up effort is underway in new zealand's south island, where a months worth of rain has fallen in two days. it's one of the region's worst floods on record, with swollen rivers causing widespread damage and mass evacuations. now on bbc news, it's hardtalk. hello and welcome to hardtalk, i'm shaun ley. a quarter of lebanon's
4:31 am
population is syrian, refugees of war. now the party of my guest, deputy prime minister ghassan hasbani, says enough is enough. it wants to send them home but says it rules out talking to president assad — how can it be sure they'd be safe. the government say it's a burden the undermines the country's future is this the biggest threat or is it a political system that is entrenched sectarianism, legitimized bigotry and encouraged corruption so bad, it can't even leave the lights on? corruption so bad, it can't even keep the lights on? hardtalk theme music. ghassan hasbani, welcome to hardtalk, thank you for being with us.
4:32 am
up to 1.5 million syrians have sought refuge in your country in the course of the war. about a quarter of your population now. how big a threat does that represent to lebanon? initially it is a huge economic and social burden on the country, no doubt. lebanon welcomed all these syrians at the beginning, given the need, the humanitarian situation they were in. after a while — and this is several years on — this has...the numbers have increased significantly and they have placed a huge burden on the infrastructure, on the health—care system, on electricity, on everything. the united nations and dona countries have been able to support them on a humanitarian basis... cause you do not allow them to work and they can't, in a sense, put down roots in your country. well, it's quite, you know, almost impossible to actually integrate them with the scale. imagine like 20 million people in the uk landing within less than four years, in the country.
4:33 am
it is virtually impossible to actually integrate them at any level. so the international community has been quite helpful in that. but the humanitarian level and the crisis is actually now turning into a more permanent situation with is causing host community fatigue, donor community fatigue, while the situation is gradually improving in syria. it's time now to start thinking about how they can safely return back home without causing any potential tensions or further tensions by being in lebanon with such a big scale. yes, i mean, your party leader, samir geagea, has said just a few days ago, after several years of residency, some refugees have started to act as if they own the place. i mean, patience is running out by the sound of it. well, it is quite natural that, when you have such a great number of people — some towns in lebanon, in the north, in the beqaa, the ratio has actually reversed, a quarter of the town is lebanese and three quarters are refugees or syrian displaced people.
4:34 am
so you can imagine the social tensions that that could cause. 50% of them are unemployed youth, 50% of the youth are totally unemployed, and this number is increasing so that is causing significant tensions. part of it, you could argue, is because you won't let them work, and you won't let them do anything productive to contribute to the community. i mean, if you have lots of people hanging around ‘cause they're not allowed to work, that creates social problems in itself. let's put it this way, the youth unemployment among the lebanese is at 30% already. right. so it is not about not letting anyone work, it's about the lack of of availability of work opportunities for everyone. lebanon was already under economic stress. are they taking some of the work away? i noticed your colleague, george adwan, saying recently — a fellow lebanese forces mp, your party — saying that "unfortu nately our syrian brothers are taking more job opportunities away from the lebanese." i mean, i wonder how that's how that's happening? well, indeed, illegally, basically the black market ofjobs and there are some mundane jobs that they're doing...
4:35 am
some lebanese are exploiting them... in general, the syrians had always worked in lebanon, in specificjobs that the law allowed them for, but now we see them in morejob like more specialised jobs, in the healthcare sector, for example where it becomes a bit dangerous, also to work uncontrolled. trouble is, though, isn't it, that part of the problem in the sense that kind of adds to these difficulties is policy decisions government takes. the unhcr says policy restrictions on residency renewal effect the basic rights and freedoms of refugees, of all nationalities, but obviously mostly that's lebanese, some palestinians as well. livelihoods remain one of the big challenges faced and, in a sense, that policy heightens the risk of exploitation, as the human rights watch — the non—government organization — has pointed out, in its report this year, heightens the risk of expectation and abuse. of exploitation and abuse.
4:36 am
so you create a situation where people are there and they're there and you can't do much about it at the moment, but it kind of institutionalises the sense, for them, a kind of uselessness, and for your own people resentment. here they are, they are not doing anything, how are they living? who is paying for them? maybe i'm paying for them... the situation is much worse than that. it is not about the lebanese resenting, it's actually the syrian refugees receiving financial aid perfamily, per child, benefit, hospitalisation, medical support, receiving food rations and food support as well as using lebanese electricity and infrastructure, so it is not aboutjob creation, it is more about a lebanese wanting to go to hospital and finding that this hospital is more than 50% used by syrian refugees, paid for by someone who pays quickly, while his services are kind of less provided than the refugees. we have not reached a point where this resentment is actually causing tensions at the extreme level, however this could lead
4:37 am
to a situation where both sides, both the refugees as well as the lebanese, start getting the fatigue element. i mean, you say you haven't reached that stage yet but you would seem the reports that were on social media a little bit before we recorded this interview about a group of men physically and verbally assaulting a syrian refugee. the group, i understand, have been arrested by your security forces now. the video which kind of spread like wildfire on social media, showed a man called uklah, from eastern province in syria, being kicked on the ground, as he begs this group of men to stop. they shout and swear at him, they demand he praises of the lebanese army and curses the group that calls itself islamic state, and the syrian people. there was voice note, also, going around urging lebanese to beat syrians. it is already there. the opposite was there actually. we have a lot of syrians actually
4:38 am
cursing at the lebanese army, attacking the lebanese army verbally, et cetera. so tensions are rising on both sides. right, so we accept that — your solution, your suggested solution — at least the one your party leader has put forward, mr geagea, is that they should go home. and you are going to put proposals to the cabinet of ways that you think that can be achieved. what sort of thing are you suggesting? what sort of things are you looking at? let's start first, the safer areas in syria exceed in scale and size and surface area, the surface area of lebanon by about 60 times so there are several safe areas now in syria — they call them safe zones or areas or regions — and let's also be careful about these people come from different parts of syria so the areas where they could go back to home, they can. some have actually been going back home and coming back to lebanon because the border controls have not been 100% airtight. so it is about having the right structures for them to go back
4:39 am
safely — and we want them to go back safely, this is a very important point — it is not about forcing them to out of lebanon, it's about making the right steps, the right policy steps to safely have them return, with the international community support. you do not have that, at the moment. do you? because sigrid kaag, she's the un special co—ordinator for lebanon, said that, in the beginning ofjuly, "whether or not will be possible to have in syria, in the nearfuture, areas where refugees will be willing to go back, we seem to be very far from having it because the situation remains very fragile and the conflict continues in a very dramatic way." i mean, you'd accept that, wouldn't you ? she is the expert. it is something to be discussed. i guess, you know, it depends, because the group of refugees, they are not all from one colour or one side. what is safe four someone may not safe for another. they can decide where to go back to but if the economic situation... this is very interesting, you say they can decide.
4:40 am
let me point out an example, that the human right watch pointed to in its country report of lebanon this year, and in a sense, forgive me, but it's slightly undermines the people's confidence in whether that you are really that the people's confidence in whether you are really that bothered if it's safe for them to go back. it says, "injanuary, 2016, lebanese authorities, in violation of their international obligations, sent hundreds of syrians, travelling through beirut airport, back to syria, without first assessing their risk of harm upon return." ok, let's backtrack a little bit. you're not disputing that happened? people passed through the lebanese airport because not many syrians can actually fly directly to syria, so they pass through beirut airport and thy drive through to syria, back and forth. millions of syrians do that, they are not refugees, they live in syria safely. they drive through, they fly out of beirut airport because many airlines do not fly directly to syria. so technically and physically and practically, there are safe areas in syria for many people to go back and forth through the borders. clearly, if that was the case for this group, then they would have been going back and forth on their own.
4:41 am
they have been. well, the human rights watch says in this case, they were kind of effectively forced back without any consideration. nobody forced anybody. you see, the other point is you are not signatories to the refugee convention, from 1951 anyway, as a county, so you have not sort of formally committed to the international standards and another reason why people are a bit sceptical about whether they can take your word on this. let's put it this way, imagine, as i said, more than 100 million people coming from syria or from anywhere in the world — imagine the scale — to europe. this is the kind of scale of population we're talking about. largest refugees per population situation in the world, so norms, as the world applies, cannot be applied there. this is an international problem, it's not a lebanese problem only... so the world is not doing enough to support you in this? the world has to work first on making sure that there are secure areas in syria for them to go back.
4:42 am
it is not a pure lebanese problem, it is also a european problem, and an international problem. presumably then you are not wildly happy that donald trump has decided that syrians are a nationality he does not want coming into the united states, cause again that adds to the burden back home. well, the burden is being added anyway. what we're saying here... so it's alright what the americans do? what we're saying here is it is important for the international community to take this step and make sure, one, that there are really safe areas in syria, because we have seen evidence of people going back to syria safely, without any problem, and any refugee convention will tell you that an individual who can go safely back home is not considered as a refugee any more in the country where they applied refugee status. will you work with president assad's government to ensure that they can return safely? let's also talk about that, there is no guarantee that these groups of people who are in lebanon, feel safe in the assad regime areas. their safe areas might be outside of the assad regime... this is still the government
4:43 am
of the country. if you go ahead and do it without the involvement of the government and, let's face it, as your own party leader has acknowledged, you have relations with the syrian government for security reasons. your security services co—operate, mr geagea has said that himself recently. allowing for that, why notjust say, 0k, we will deal with that, we may not like him but if we want to reduce this burden on our own population, then sometimes you have to deal with people you wouldn't choose to otherwise. just to show you how serious we are about the safety of these people and the safe return of refugees — that's one major element. the safe return requires people to return to areas where they feel safe to return to. and if they were part of the opposition — and let's face it, the opposition has started a long time ago, way before any terrorist groups moved in syria, and have started acting in syria, this is a legitimate opposition — so if those people do not feel safe going back to the regime areas, how can we actually talk to the regime about sending them back to them? they might be persecuted. they might be put in danger. and the international
4:44 am
community is not even ready to share their name with the syrian regime. will the unhcr share their name with the syrian regime? if the unhcr cannot do that, why should we be doing that? we're saying, we are being very logical and very practical, about this. there are safe areas, they can choose to go back to them... they can choose, no one will be forced out of lebanon? lebanon has actually... that is a yes or no question. lebanon has agreed to the non—refoulement principle so people will not be forced out but we have to be also logical... there is always a but... let me explain the difference. if you are actually incentivising them, giving them a big cash and financial... are you going to bribe them to go home? no, no, you're giving them an incentive to stay in lebanon, the international community is putting a major incentive for them to stay in lebanon. they are getting all these unemployment benefits effectively, family benefits... better to kind of give them nothing so they get so desperate they go home. no, no, and that could also pu them in danger. what we need to do, again,
4:45 am
being very illogical about it, starting to build the infrastructure for them where they can actually go back in safe areas and gradually give them this opportunity to start feeling... and it is a humanitarian thing to be back home.. so the honest message you are sending to people in lebanon — it might not be individuals, it mightjust be the volume they are finding too difficult to deal with, because sometimes syrians are welcome, sometimes not, we won't talk about the military, is that you will send them home, but it is going to take time. it is not going to happen over the next month, the next year. and plainly, put together, it's not something that happens overnight. but we need to start working on it from now, because we have like 32,000 new births in lebanon. —— because we have like 42,000 new births in lebanon. a lot of them are not registered, so basically, how are they going to be recognised as syrian citizens later on? i understand. we are dealing with that situation right now, to make sure they get recognised. your party leader, michel aoun, says it is ridiculous to ask you to work with president assad,
4:46 am
yet at the same time in government with hezbollah, who are fighting with president assad's side. this must be straining relations, not least when your political system is so finely balanced. look, we have formed a coalition government that includes all constituents of the lebanese society. and we have made sure that the government manifesto and the plan, which we call the return to confidence, and we have made sure that any points we do not believe in are actually either opposed to, or not included in that programme, including the situation that hezbollah has actually put the country. we do not agree. although we are in government, it is a coalition government, but we reserve the right not to agree for anyone to carry arms in lebanon except the police, army, and no—one to defend lebanese borders except police and army. and i suppose some of these compromises risk undermining the state itself. this is what david schenker
4:47 am
at the washington institute wrote earlier this year. aoun continues to defend hezbollah's possession of weapons outside state control, and its resistance agenda against israel. again, all these outside influences compromise what you can do as an independent sovereign country. our main objective is to keep the country sovereign, independent and safe. that is the problem, with all of these people outside pulling the strings. there has been a lot of influence in the past. but we managed to agree on an election rule, we managed to agree on a budget, we managed to actually pass a lot of things through the system without external influence, in the last six months, at least. six months — well, it's a start, isn't it? i was going to ask you about the election, because it has taken years. we have had the situation where there should have been a general election back in 2014, and there is now going to be one in 2018. there will be two ballots,
4:48 am
one of a party candidate and one of an individual candidate, but they can still only vote for an individualfrom that same party list. so, in a sense, haven't you missed an opportunity to slowly weaken sectarianism? if they could have used that individual vote for any candidate in any list, they might have said, i'm a supporter of the lebanese front, i'm a christian, but actually i quite like that guy over there. he is a socialist, he is from a different list, he might even be a muslim, but i think as an individual he is good for government and parliament in lebanon. but you don't have that opportunity. well, you have the opportunity within the list. the lists are sectarian. no, lists can be indefinite. you can have as many lists, as long as they pass a certain hurdle. this law has actually created a better representation, because in lebanon it is a matrix. so, without getting involved in too many details, it is allowing actually, now, people who have minorities, but who have a presence and are quite popular in their regional area,
4:49 am
to be selected from the list with a preferential vote, or allowing people to form independent lists, and actually get through the system if they have — if they can pass the hurdle. so your hope is that the independent lists will actually broaden that kind of — will actually slowly create — break some of that sectarianism up. exactly, and it will create opportunities for new faces in parliament, as well as it will supplement also the party politics that we aim to get to outside the sectarian structure. i mean, lebanon's political system kind of, in a sense, seems frozen in time. it is based on a sectarian division dating from 1943, which used population figures from the census conducted in 1932, so that is getting on for 90 years ago. i guess some of the population figures might have changed a bit in that time. i wonder if you think that that sectarianism embedded into the political structure is why, internationally, lebanon is viewed
4:50 am
as so corrupt? it is not about sectarianism. so sectarianism is part of the structure, because it has been defined this way, and it continues to be defined this way, because it represents the various cultural structures of lebanon, which is a good mosaic. and this is a positivity about lebanon, not a negativity. sectarian unfortunately was used in the civil war to divide people up, but today it is quite different. it's actually creating more value in creating multiple cultures, multiple different religious background and religious groups, who live together, co—habit in this country, and work together. and then it protects minorities, and divides them 50—50. so it creates this partnership between muslims and christians, and this is a unique experience in the middle east. you say it is not dividing up, but the lebanon transparency association says corruption in lebanon exists in its forms, including bribery, nepotism, patronage, embezzlement, kickbacks, and vote—buying. the causes include the postwar structure, which has led
4:51 am
to a power—sharing formula among political and confessional groups. that means they are competing for resources. that was a situation created by the civil war, unfortunately, which we have been working towards getting rid of as much as possible. it is already 27 years ago. indeed, and our party is in government to actually curb that and fight it, and all the things we are doing are focused, with a single—minded approach to curb corruption. i guess... i am sure that is your intention, but you will be aware that transparency international, for instance, demoted lebanon another 13 places on its list of corrupt countries. it is now 136 out of 176 countries. that was done... the research was done last year. i think they should keep it updated with time. we look forward to seeing what dramatic change there has been. it takes time to actually reverse that trend. see, the classic example of this, and we will deal with this relatively briefly, but it is important,
4:52 am
is the inability to provide a reliable electricity supply, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. and one of the consequences of that is that the state electricity utility can't supply the electricity, so people have set up their own generators, and some of that has inevitably committed to the corruption. the leader of the progressive socialist party, walid jumblat, tweeted earlier this year, stop dividing electricity spoils. save lebanon's electricity centre from shabbiness, corruption, and those avaricious for money and politics. what is happening is a crime. would you agree to "crime"? exactly, and my cry in the government is to actually demand that we cut down any wastage, that we still keep paying for electricity through our budget, which has put a huge burden on the government budget. $2 billion a year. about $1.5 billion a year — dollars, yes, dollars. and this is, cumulative, more than $20 billion over several yea rs. now is the time to go back and solve that problem, and i have been making this
4:53 am
as my key agenda item in this government. we have succeeded in pushing this agenda forward. there is now a plan that is being implemented by the energy minister. and we are making sure that we are observing this plan very closely, so it could be implemented quickly, at the lowest possible cost, to get back electricity. because we are the last country in the world in terms of quality of electricity supply, and we need to reverse that situation very, very quickly. in five years, it should be done. i hope so. you have got a 50—year plan, i think. at the moment, the electricity company apparently can't get the sign on at night outside its headquarters, according to the reuters news agency. it doesn't sound great. let me put to you what husam beides, a world bank official based in beirut, told reuters. he was talking in 2015. he said, in about five years? time, come 2020, instead of having an average supply of 16 to 18 hours a day, it probably will have gone down to 12 hours. the technical solutions are all proven and tested, you can build the plant
4:54 am
with the money, but he says what is needed is political will to make a decision. and that is what we are doing in this government. you know, the electricity file pops up on the government agenda every couple of weeks. so it is that frequent. we meet every week, and we are pushing this agenda very, very quickly. so when will the lights stay on, any time of day or night? well, today it is 20 hours. we are actually pushing for this to happen. there are definitely solutions which will bring electricity quickly. but we need to make sure that these temporary solutions are not past a corrupt system, they are past through the official systems, with transparency, and all contracts are signed properly. and this is what we are pushing for, as well as making sure that the longer—term solutions are unlocked very quickly, without any further delays. and we just had recently, a few days ago, a big discussion about the time lapse required to actually get these off the ground very quickly. so we are trying to do this within months, not years. ghassan hasbani, a promise of power to the people.
4:55 am
thank you very much for being with us on hardtalk. hello. that was an up—and—down weekend. many of us saw rain at some stage of the weekend. for some of us, it came from big clouds, threatening skies, and some intense downpours, but i think most of us saw some sunshine at some stage of the weekend, as well. in the sunshine, it wasn't too bad. but it is still up and down as we go through this week. that means a week of changeable weather on the way. but going to try to turn things drier and warmer in the next couple of days.
4:56 am
not going to last, mind you. unsettled from wednesday. we'll all see some rain on wednesday, and the wind will be picking up, as well, during the second half of the week. now, the area of low pressure that produced the downpours over the weekend still close by for monday, affecting parts of central and eastern england. then we've got a bit of a gap, and we're looking to developments in the atlantic to bring more of that unsettled weather from midweek. but from monday, cloudy, with outbreaks of rain affecting some central and eastern parts of the uk as we go through the day, from that area of low pressure, and a cool breeze, as well. whereas the western side of the uk — going to be a lovely day across south—west england, wales, some long, sunny spells to be found here. but, through much of the midlands, south—east england, east anglia, up through yorkshire into north—east england, plenty of cloud around. the further east you are, into east anglia and the far south—east, a few sunny spells among the clouds. parts of yorkshire, to begin the day some outbreaks of rain. north—east england, though, bearing up quite well. northern ireland, a few fog patches around to begin the day. plenty of sunshine in western scotland. rather cloudy, and low cloud at that, into the far north—east
4:57 am
of scotland, northern isles, hanging around during the day. and it is an east—west split for monday's weather. if you're underneath this cloud, it will feel quite cool, though it may brighten up and see the odd sharp shower in parts of east anglia and the far south—east of england. but for wales, for western england, for northern ireland, and for northern scotland, where in in some sunshine it will be very pleasant. 25 celsius in glasgow, though a late—day shower somewhere in western scotland can't be ruled out. as we go through monday evening, still some of those outbreaks of rain in the east of england, gradually beginning to pull away as we say goodbye to that area of low pressure. still some cloud around, though, from it, as we begin the day on tuesday. should start to break up, then we'll see some warm, sunny spells coming through again, and a gap between weather systems on tuesday. so take advantage of that, and enjoy the warmth in that sunshine, though it is still on the cool side for some along north sea coasts, with an onshore breeze. but here is that wetter and windier weather system coming in for wednesday. well, it is the summer holidays. doesn't look like that, though, on the chart here,
4:58 am
and there will be rain spreading right across the uk, strengthening wind to near—gale in the north—west. and then for thursday and friday, we're into some cool and fresh air, with sunny spells and showers. this is bbc news. i'm tim willcox. our top stories: president trump's son—in—law, jared kushner, prepares to face questions from senators investigating alleged russian meddling in last year's election. at least nine people have died after being trapped in the back of a truck in texas — police say they were victims of people trafficking. and the people of mosul begin the process of rebuilding their lives in a city destroyed by war. doctor fox goes to washington... the uk's international trade secretary meets his us counterpart to talk trade. but he's not allowed to strike a deal, before brexit. the international monetary fund keeps its forecast for world economic growth. but it cuts prospects for the uk and the us, while china and the
4:59 am
eurozone gets a boost.
5:00 am

54 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on