tv The Papers BBC News August 19, 2017 11:30pm-11:46pm BST
11:30 pm
drizzle. lzzfl— w; "t ‘ur cloud. drizzle. turning heavier towards the evening. patches of cloud ahead of that. for east wales, the midlands, northern england, dry with spells of sunshine. clouding overin with spells of sunshine. clouding over in northern ireland. scotland, far fewer showers than we have seen today. more sunny spells. sunday night. the rain will get heavier in wales. southern england, the midlands, late in the night, heavy rain. with all of this wet weather, low cloud. mist out hill fog forming as well. that is tied to the weather front allowing warm air into the south of the uk. monday, a cloudy note in england and wales. low cloud and mistand note in england and wales. low cloud and mist and fog and damp drizzly conditions. northern ireland, southern and western scotland, a weather front bringing southern and western scotland, a weatherfront bringing rain. the finals of scotland staying dry. brighter in the south. —— far north.
11:31 pm
despite that, quite humid with temperatures into the low 20s. tuesday, a cloudy note. better prospect of seeing sunshine in the south. bear in mind, that is where the warm air is. temperatures could get to 29 even in the best of the sunshine. it depends on how much sunshine. it depends on how much sunshine with the. nevertheless, that would be the hottest weather we have seen so far this relatively poor august. and that is your weather. hello, this is bbc news with chris rogers. we'll be taking a look at tomorrow mornings papers in a moment, first the headlines at 11:30: the spanish government says the terror cell responsible for two van attacks has been dismantled, as the hunt continues for the suspect who may have driven the van. professor stephen hawking has clashed with health secretary jeremy hunt over the state of the nhs. the cambridge professor criticised the impact of government policies, and of the health secretary himself the prime minister of finland says
11:32 pm
the country has experienced it's first ever terror attack. a british paramedic was hurt in the incident, as he tried to protect two women from a man wielding a knife. tens of thousands of anti—racism demonstrators have gathered in boston to oppose a rally featuring far—right speakers. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are anne ashworth, who's associate editor at the times, and bonnie greer, the playwright and columnist at the new european. tomorrow's front pages, starting with the sunday times leads with its story that the queen won't stand down for prince charles. the front page is dominated by an image of her majesty in pink. the daily mail says hope is fading
11:33 pm
for the seven year old boy missing following the attack in barcelona. the daily express has the same story, it says the boy's injured british mother is desperately searching for her son. the telegraph also covers the barcelona attack, but focuses on plans to crack down on car and van rentals in its aftermath. and the observer says theresa may's claim that the uk can break free of eu laws while still reaping its economic benefits is "rubbish" — according to a top legal official. that got you both giggling. that got you both gigglingi that got you both giggling. i think what the newspapers do not do enough and what my newspaper does is talk about what brexit is. it is a legal action in relation to the eu. the eu
11:34 pm
is saying, and it is very simple, that the uk is asking it to create a new tier of law in relation to it. keeping a single market creates new law, keeping citizens here under british jurisdiction law, keeping citizens here under britishjurisdiction is law, keeping citizens here under british jurisdiction is a law, keeping citizens here under britishjurisdiction is a new law, keeping citizens here under british jurisdiction is a new type of eu citizen and it is very simple but yet the government wants us to believe that there is a void. but we're talking about the law and this story is not as gathered as it should be but the gist of it is right. this is about the law and the law is not given enough attention in this brexit story. it is coming back to something about red lines which mrs may set out in a conference speech last year. one of them was that we would have nothing more to do with the european court of
11:35 pm
justice... do with the european court of justice... a lot of people felt very strongly about it. but that is the many brexiteers an absolute plank... it is everything for them and we have somebody who used to be a legal adviser to the government saying that cannot happen if we wish to have a close relationship with the customs union. it is very simple. it isa customs union. it is very simple. it is a legal relationship. what we are asking the eu to do, which it cannot do, is create a new tier of lawjust for the uk. they are saying what are we getting out of this? what are we getting in return? nothing that is going to benefit the eu. the interpretation was quite simple that the power of law and lawmaking was
11:36 pm
handed back to the british court. absolutely beautiful. the problem is, you either get out or you are in. you cannot create a new kind of eu citizen who lives in the uk, under two differentjurisdictions at the same time... why not? america is to justice systems? note, the same time... why not? america is tojustice systems? note, if he the same time... why not? america is to justice systems? note, if he go to justice systems? note, if he go to the us, you are not subject to british law in the united states of america. you are a british citizen but in the united states we are subject to the american law not subject to the american law not subject to the british law. what they are asking is this citizens can stay but they cannot be outside the law. theresa may says fine but we are not going to accept your court
11:37 pm
and the eu is saying, that is not possible. what it is is a new bunch of laws. really, really interesting, you should write a piece about a... i have. you have! laughter let's move on to the sunday times. a wonderful picture of the queen. she does not smile often. it is a proper front—page picture. does not smile often. it is a proper front-page picture. she knows this. a picture to delight you. the sunday times readers get the queen. this is an interesting story and a key story that the queen despite all the i’uitioui's are that the queen despite all the i’uitioui’s are running that the queen despite all the rumours are running around, is not going to stand down and turn prince charles into the regent. there will be more sharing of the responsibilities but she is going to stay true to the promises she made when she took the crown, when she was made queen, that she would serve
11:38 pm
her nation and i think it is something that when people read it tomorrow morning, they would feel very reassured by that. do you think she will continue to wind down? which is good. it is rather a proper management structure. this is the royal firm and you would allow the executives of the future to take on some responsibilities. sorry i keep interrupting, the problem with prince charles is that the more prince charles is that the more prince william does, the more people wa nt prince william does, the more people want him, to skip one... this is like a reality to be so. it is but it is not. if that queen and hopefully this will not happen very soon, if she needs to step aside because the council is getting older, then the line of secession continues. this was the same issue
11:39 pm
with a bit tory. edward vii came in as an old guy. —— with victoria. a lot of people maybe even envy this country because there is a head of state, back off of these, and all the things churning and going on, she is there. do you feel sorry for prince charles? he has been waiting for this is a lie. since three years old. i have never thought of that. have you watched their crowd? you quys have you watched their crowd? you guys have talked about this.|j have you watched their crowd? you guys have talked about this. i am going to phone you and make sure you watch it. -- the crown. it becomes an ever more harrowing read. this is
11:40 pm
an ever more harrowing read. this is a very difficult story to read. the family of this poor little boy, julian cadman, his father has flown romp australia to wind up as happened to his son. it is a truly, truly hard raking. i am sure happened to his son. it is a truly, truly hard raking. lam sure he happened to his son. it is a truly, truly hard raking. i am sure he will be going to the hospitals and maybe even to the morgue to find out what has happened. it is these stories, stories like this that bring home the enormity of terror, ofjust the loss of somebody having a gorgeous night out in las ramblas...|j loss of somebody having a gorgeous night out in las ramblas... i agree with that. aside from the tragedy, this story is keeping us connected ona human this story is keeping us connected on a human level to something that is going to be part of our life expert said the next two decades. it is important to keep humanising this
11:41 pm
as much as we can because it is going to be more and more the story... this is a generational story... this is a generational story. this little boy, and his family, is helping us to stay human about this. does it strike you just how many children are growing up with this form of terrorism and emotionally what that might do? one wonders how one talks to children. this is their reality. as there are more bollards put into street...” have always been very outspoken. you tell children but you tell them in a way that they understand. you do not hide it. with so much access to misinformation, it is more important to go to programmes like newsround and their website and other children's organisations that do explain what is going on and put it
11:42 pm
into context. i grew up under the bomb. my childhood was about nuclear destruction. we were told this at school. there were movies. i think, as you say, you tell children the truth and children are very resilient, they can understand the truth if it is presented to them in a way... truth if it is presented to them in away...i truth if it is presented to them in a way... i was presented in nuclear devastation. you also tell them there is more chances of them getting run over not looking both ways... exactly. the mail on sunday has made quite clearjust exactly how much worse this attack could have been. it went wrong for them. it could have been much worse for us but it is a reminder that we need to get it right all the time. it is a human story. as the sunday telegraph
11:43 pm
points out, talk about how we can try to stop this new style of attack, using vans and cars. some commentators have already said, we need something bigger to crack down on terrorism. i really do think we can have all these electric about we will not be defeated but we have to do as many practical things as we possibly can and a number of practical things can make it much harder. any that complains they are taking too many cheques are will ta ke taking too many cheques are will take no sympathy. this has to happen but i think what our government leaders should tell people, i do not know how you do it, that this is a generational struggle and that they can do every cheque they want but
11:44 pm
people move up and mutate and, as i say, they just need people move up and mutate and, as i say, theyjust need to get lucky ones so we need to teach our population to be vigilant. i leave off oxford circuit and i look around and people are not paying attention and people are not paying attention and it is something that should really be grounded home to people. look around you, look for your excerpts, no where you go. this is very important and we need to understand very simple things about public space right now because all of these crimes are low—tech and they will be lower and lower tech is time goes on. a couple more stories i need to point out. the sunday times, the queen gracing ourfront pages. rees mogg, also on the front
11:45 pm
page. he is making nice money from a financial firm which is set up in 2007. he gets about £1 million a year.. 2007. he gets about £1 million a year. . . why 2007. he gets about £1 million a year. .. why is that a story? exactly. six months ago may not have been interesting. the big personality, the breakthrough guy, who could lead to their party, all these ridiculous words and people... what people are attracted to about rees mogg is that he owns being a toff. he is unashamedly posh... don't hold back. this is all theatre and it is also silly season theatre. iam and it is also silly season theatre. i am saying that momentum is theatre and you can read tory mps saying
34 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
BBC News Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on