to ease its public service role under plans drawn up by the new regulator ofcom. the daily express reveals that britain has paid £374 billion into the eu's coffers over the past 43 years. the times claims theresa may has asked president trump to intervene ina asked president trump to intervene in a trade dispute which threatens thousands of jobs in in a trade dispute which threatens thousands ofjobs in belfast amid pressure from the dup. the daily mail leads on reports from its investigations unit on the activities of labours shadow chancellor. let's look at some of the stories behind the headlines, the stories behind the headlines, the titans, trump mane jobs, the stories behind the headlines, the titans, trump manejobs, ulster unionists are diplomas to protect the belfast economy. the us -based international trade commission is meant to be making a decision on the complaint which was brought by the american company boeing, aircraft building company against their rival

canadian company called bombardier and the issue is that the american company is claiming that the canadian company has an unfair advantage on them because of a state, because of state hand—outs they are getting from the canadian government. included in all of that isa government. included in all of that is a contract that they have of creating, of creating these engines in belfast saw a lot of irish jobs are actually attached in that deal. so the story here is that because of the power arlene foster now wields on our the power arlene foster now wields on oui’ government because the power arlene foster now wields on our government because of the coalition that theresa may has had to enter into to keep government going arlene foster has asked theresa may to plead with donald trump to ascaris trade body not to intervene so that the jobs are protected in belfast. northern irish jobs. so henry, is this arlene

foster, she has some clout now, quite a bit of client with theresa may, is this the kind of thing that if theresa may does not act could put the deal in jeopardy? i'm if theresa may does not act could put the deal injeopardy? i'm not sure, it's an interesting subtext but you expect the british prime minister to stand but you expect the british prime ministerto stand up but you expect the british prime minister to stand up for british manufacturing jobs especially in a reason like northern ireland where employment is a problem. we have been hearing a lot about the potential for a us uk trade deal, doesn't donald trump on a great deal with the uk and this just shows the ha rd with the uk and this just shows the hard issues which are going to come today. donald trump is being lobbied by boeing on the american side and we want to stand up for ourjobs on the site. so these trade deals are not win, win, you have to fight over things. downing street is pleading behind the scenes but it may well be there is a ruling which renders this

northern irish operation effectively not profitable and meansjobs go. then this great love in between theresa may and donald trump does not yield economic results. he is still supposed to be coming on a state visit isn't he at some point? it keeps getting kicked into the long grass doesn't it? the suspicion is donald trump is quite apprehensive of protesters and there isa apprehensive of protesters and there is a worry, he worries he might not get a very warm welcome from some quarters and that's why it keeps getting pushed back. if he does not sort this out he's not going to northern ireland if he does come. similar story on the front page of the sun, do a deal on eu jobs prime minister theresa may should consider giving eu citizens who want to work here preferential treatment. this is harderformer here preferential treatment. this is harder former chief here preferential treatment. this is harderformer chief aide here preferential treatment. this is harder former chief aide claiming this. nick timothy who resigned

after the disastrous election result. it's interesting because during the election campaign we had people arguing on the brexit side saying we want to treat migrants fairly so if someone comes from paul and they should not have an easier route into the uk than someone from pakistan and you had people who own curry houses saying the same thing, we still need to get chefs but other businesses can bring in builders from romania. what nick timothy is saying that preferential treatment, the advantage the eu workers should continue at the brexit and there are reasons for it, we need things from the eu so showing good well and that we still see a distinctive partnership with them but it will be controversial. yes, you only brexit editorfor controversial. yes, you only brexit editor for your controversial. yes, you only brexit editorfor your paper. controversial. yes, you only brexit editor for your paper. rbc now the debate which perhaps should have happened during the referendum and

the run up to that, the ins and outs of how difficult this whole thing is, how easy it is perhaps in the eyes of some. now it all seems to be happening about after—the—fact. eyes of some. now it all seems to be happening about after-the-fact. the problem with referendums is you have to have, because it was a yes or no vote you have two fight it on the very big picture. that's what it was fought on. if you wanted to get into the details of it it would be quite, it would take hours of explaining and discussion. which is why we don't have a referendum very often. it also highlights the importance of a figurehead in a referendum. because that just a figurehead in a referendum. because thatjust means that people your side trust, you like to think

they have looked into the details and are putting forward a position and are putting forward a position and you're being asked to vote yes oi’ and you're being asked to vote yes or no but you're right, these are important details now needing to be discussed. which is why both sides wa nted discussed. which is why both sides wanted someone like borisjohnson on their side presumably. the front page of the daily express, 374 billion, what the eu has cost you. coming out of the single market, the influence of britain's jobs, none of that but that is the headline and they say these are official figures. i would like to see how they make these figures, net, growth, adjusted for inflation? we have paid so much over the years, 43 years, we should not pay any more as an exit that is the point you're making. the mps

debating the repeal bill which sets the legal framework for brexit, someone the legal framework for brexit, someone got up and said i am a brexiteers and i want to leave but we should have magnanimity in victory and the eu has been budgeting for spending a certain month, we are leaving and taking money out the pot, we have to be appreciative of that. we have to help our partners and should not just slam the door closed and walk out. for me it was an interesting example of someone on one side of the fence reaching over to others and singi the fence reaching over to others and sing i see your argument. this headline from the express is people of one side of the fence staying on that side of the fence and saying no compromise. interesting to see some voices in parliament taking us off the line. the debate is going on, expecting the vote after midnight. looks as if tory mps are going to fall in line and as a result it will pass. it will be very close i think. we will have to wait until midnight

to see how it's all going. the report i hear, most brexiters actually understand we will be paying eu and amount but i think what most people want to see is how that amount is being calculated and a lot of people think it's on the eu to tell us how they have come to an amount. this is indeed quite a hardline view here. it is the daily express. 0k hardline view here. it is the daily express. ok the daily telegraph, bbc winning the battle to ease public service role, this is because ofcom is now the regulator and a bit of lobbying from the bbc has meant now there are certain things we don't necessarily, i say we, the bbc does not necessarily have to do perhaps. to an extent it makes sense because for a long time the bbc has been told you need to step with the times

and is... you've got to be competitive. so the bbc is now seeing if you want us to compete with commercial services you have to give us independence when it comes to deciding how we do our programming. this is the sort of proposal being put forward. fewer regulations on them and fewer requirements to produce a certain type of programme is what we are seeing. potentially not as much religion or science, all that stuff that perhaps you're not necessarily going to see on i don't know some commercial rivals. what they are worried about is that viewers are not going to commercial radio but they are going to digital music services. they are not tuning in which means you don't get any news, it's an interesting attempt by the bbc to get young viewers. the bbc saying we don't have as much money as we used to to make things like

comedy and drama which require more funding. young listeners to radio, i am not sure what the rules would be her tv actually, interesting to find out. the financial times, talking about the media, this is a story concerning news—gathering and different social media platforms. henry, twitter facebook and snapchat, the people who use them regularly tend to get their news from these sources more than they would from any other media company. it's a huge leap. when facebook started out it was a replacement for a harvard university service which got you to know other freshers in your university year. now it's a new service more than two thirds of facebook users or social media users use facebook for news. that means these big american companies cannot so easily dodge the editorial responsibility. we saw in the american election questions about

who was using it, fake accounts, strange advertisers on the service. this kind of data puts that front and centre. the problem is if you are on twitter you have a certain, certain people you follow and that is the news which comes your way, the same with facebook and snapchat. snapchat disappears after ten secondsisit? snapchat disappears after ten seconds is it? what kind of news, i am sure people would love this bulletin to disappear after ten seconds... 20 seconds i am being told. i think it raises an interesting challenge for people like us who are news providers. here is an audience which expects to get its news in 20 seconds and it's up to us ina its news in 20 seconds and it's up to us in a way to make sure we provide the high quality news we like to pride ourselves on being able to provide within that time. 0ur newspaper takes this very seriously at the telegraph, we have a dedicated snapchat who prepare

snaps i think they are called which present a news story so it's all very interesting, the world is changing. changing way too quickly for me but we have snappy people out there. they are doing the same thing. good to see you both, thank you. we might have you back a little bit later. 11:20pm apparently. yes, you will be back. cannot get away. that's it for the papers, stay with us, more coming up, let's get a look at the weather. monday was yet again another day of sunny spells and showers i'm quite blustery wind all thanks to that area of low pressure. you get the sense as you move out of monday into tuesday things are beginning to change, little ridge of high pressure killing off some of the

showers but they will still be there across western parts. bit more sunshine and less breeze until later in the day, filling in the cloud, overnight this area of low pressure will throw that cloud and rain further north and east some of that will be quite heavy but we have real concerns about the strength of the wind, a lot of isobars, disruption possible overnight and indeed into the first part of wednesday. anywhere from the south of scotland, gusts around 55 mph, could be a core of winds particularly over high ground of some 25 mph. 0nce of winds particularly over high ground of some 25 mph. once that system is the winds will begin to ease and it would be a day of sunny and showers. this is bbc news. i'm clive myrie. the headlines at 11:00: hurricane irma hammers florida's west coast, causing flooding and leaving millions without electricity. share devastation everywhere you look. the parking lot of flooded,

ca rs. look. the parking lot of flooded, cars. “— look. the parking lot of flooded, cars. —— the parking lots of flooded. ahead of tonight's key parliamentary vote on brexit, the government has urged mps to back what it describes as an ‘orderly departure' from the eu. the un says the 300,000 rohingya muslims who've now fled myanmar, are victims of ethnic cleansing. we have a special report. and we'll take another look at tomorrow morning's front pages shortly. the telegraph reports on bbc radio being given more freedom, in order to compete with commercial rivals.