tv The Film Review BBC News January 20, 2018 11:45pm-12:00am GMT
11:45 pm
he goes in, rips up flexible time. he goes in, rips up government, tell citizen and clearly he has ruffled a few feathers. he has made great inroads in the environment department one year after everybody thought his political career was over but this really shows that the whitehall machine may not be the biggest fan of him and he is not the biggest fan of him and he is not the biggest fan of them either. i don't know if he ca res of them either. i don't know if he cares a lot about that. he lacks efficiency. he likes to see public serva nts efficiency. he likes to see public servants held to account. importantly, servants held to account. importa ntly, he servants held to account. importantly, he is highlighting the brexit glycol. all domestic policies have been pushed aside to focus on brexit were still need to look at like housing and nhs public servant are doing - benefits of the are doing that. benefits of the papers denied. don't forget you can see the front pages of the newspapers online on our website and it is all there for you. —— that if it is all there for you. —— that if
11:46 pm
it for the papers tonight. a warm welcome to the film review on bbc news. to take us through this week's cinema releases is mark kermode. what have you been watching this week? very exciting week. we have the post, starring tom hanks and meryl streep. coco, the new animation from pixar. and the commuter, the new liam neeson action vehicle. and the post, it's aboutjournalism. i can't wait, i'm excited. did you like it? i really did, it's a newsroom thriller about the revelations of the pentagon papers, a report which basically said that successive us administrations had misled the country about the vietnam
11:47 pm
war. the film is largely set in 1971. tom hanks is ben bradley, the editor of the washington post. he is eagerfor a scoop. meryl streep is catherine ‘kate' graham, the publisher and proprietor of the washington post. it's going to the stock exchange, so its finances are slightly precarious. when the white house gets an injunction on the new york times, after they publish some of the pentagon papers, ben bradley wants to publish. but meryl streep says, hang on, there are reasons why we can't do this, not least of all that it might actually endanger the paper. here is a clip. do you have the papers? not yet. oh gosh, oh gosh, because you know the position that would put me in. you know, we have language in the prospectus. yeah, i know, i know that the backers can
11:48 pm
change their mind. i know what's at stake. you know, the only couple i knew that both kennedy and lbj wanted to socialise with was you and your husband, and you own the damn paper. it's just the way things worked. politicians and the press, they trusted each other so they could go to the same dinner party, and drink cocktails and tell jokes, while there was a war raging in vietnam. i don't know what we're talking about. i'm not protecting lyndon. no, you've got the man who commissioned the study, he's one of about a dozen party guests out on your... and protecting the paper. the thing i like about this film is it has a number of intertwining stories. one is the story of kate graham finding her own voice. she's surrounded by men in boardrooms at the beginning. she doesn't really speak, she's slightly like a fish out of water. but during the course of this, she has to step up to the mark and decide what's the right thing to do. second thing is, it runs almost like a prequel to all the president's men.
11:49 pm
the end of this film runs right into the beginning of all the president's men, which is a film that i was really, really affected by in the 1970s when it came out. i was a kid when i saw it, and loved it. there's great period detail, sequences in the printing presses of the washington post. we're looking at the hot metal machinery, the old linotype machines. i love all that stuff. most importantly, it's a really contemporary story. that in 1971. yes, the period detail is great, the performances are great, meryl streep and tom hanks are fantastic, the whole ensemble cast is great. but this is a really contemporary story about, in this particular case, a corrupt president in the white house attempting to stop the press from expressing you know, the right of free speech. and you look at that, and you look at what's happening today, in which the press is under attack, all the stuff about fake news. recently we had the so—called fake news awards. it's a film almost like a call to arms for the press, the independent press. from a free press, to truth to power. and it's interesting that what spielberg has done is to take a period piece and tell
11:50 pm
the story straight, you know, it's not twisted in any way at all, and tell it in a way which makes it seem urgently contemporary, in terms of its gender politics, in terms of its newspaper politics, in terms of the way it talks about the necessity for a free speech and good reporting, good factual reporting, to keep check on authorities. i mean, i — i've seen the film twice now, and would happily go back and see it a third time. and you don't need to be interested injournalism, or in the issues you've just raised, to like it as a film? i think that helps, and i certainly know some people who aren't interested in those things, and aren't interested in that particular bit of history, who have said, why would you go and see it? you see it because it is a personal drama about those two characters, but also something that leads you very much by the hand. it does assume from the beginning you might not know this stuff, so it gives you a primer. it starts you in a battlefield, and it leads you and tells you all you need to know.
11:51 pm
i would encourage anyone to go and see it, because i think it's a film that is timely, although it is a period piece. and i think you don't have to be specifically interested in that war or the pentagon papers orjournalism to find it a gripping drama. and the performances are just great. 0k, fantastic. an animated film is your second choice. and a really good one, coco, the new film from pixar, set at the mexican day of the dead festivities. so12—year—old miguel longs to be a musician, but his family have banned music, because his great—grandfather years ago chose music over family. so therefore there was no more music in the family anymore. on the magical day of the dead, fate takes a hand in the land of the dead. i thought this was terrifically entertaining, and also very, very touching fare. on the one hand, it has lovely animation and slapstick sequences, and all the sort of stuff you would expect from a pixar vehicle. more importantly, it has great songs, great music. but it's dealing with some very difficult subjects — it's dealing with dementia, it's dealing with memory, it's dealing with death and life, it's dealing with loss. it's dealing with the way people live on, as long as they live on in our memory.
11:52 pm
and also the way songs and music will linger in our minds sometimes, you know, if anybody has had any experience of people with dementia, music somehow cuts through. cuts through, doesn't it? there are moments that will make you weep, moments that will make you laugh. in the end, it'll make you cheer. if you liked this film, you see it and you like it, and i really think you will do, there's another film from a few years ago, from 2014, called book of life, which got overlooked. it does have thematic depth. they make a nice companion. go and get book of life on dvd, because it's a different film, but there are great similarities and they are both terrific. ok, the commuter. the premise of the story is quite gripping. the commuter — does it deliver? liam neeson is a ex—cop working as an insurance salesman. the beginning of the film, he loses hisjob, he's doing his commute. he needs money because he has to pay for his kids' tuition. suddenly, vera farmiga turns up
11:53 pm
and says, i want you to find someone for me. i can't tell you who they are, or what they look like, but if you do it there will be a reward. here's a clip. someone on this train does not belong. all you have to do is find them. that's it. this person is carrying a bag. you don't know what it looks like, but inside that bag is something they have stolen. this person goes by the name of prynne. it's not a real name. they will be on this train until coldspring. you find them, you find the bag, the $100,000 is yours. don't leave the train before finding the bag. don't tell anyone about this offer. waita minute, waita minute. simple. i thought this was hypothetical. it's just a little thing. shouldn't be too hard for an ex—cop. how did you know?
11:54 pm
oh, that's me. you're being serious, right? you have until next stop to decide. what kind of person are you? ok, so it's intriguing set—up. they're strangers on a train. she has this — find the person, can't tell you why, there will be reward. hitchcock thrillers — you set up those rules. the rules have to make sense, and you have to obey the rules. what happens, it has an interesting premise and set—up, and 20 minutes in it goes, none of this makes sense, and actually, we don't care. it throws the rules out the window. why would he do it? that is thrown out. and itjust gets back into liam neeson walking around the train punching people. and the most frustrating thing is that when you see that clip, you think it's intriguing. what's going on? it's literally 20 minutes in, the film goes, i don't care. i don't think these rules add up to anything. the whole scenario doesn't make a... shall wejust have him punching somebody? and you get the first punching sequence, and then you go, ok, fine, it is taken on a train. it's that film you've seen all those times before, except on a train.
11:55 pm
it reminds you, what happened to that really interesting idea you threw out the window? ok, fine, moving swiftly on. not a patch on the film of the week, three billboards, which i have not... i thought about it every single day since i saw it, which is interesting in itself. brilliant performance by frances mcdormand, who has a strong chance of winning the best actress oscar. martin mcdonagh, who wrote and directed, has done a really terrificjob. made a tragicomedy that is comic and genuinely tragic. i know it is divisive. some take against it, and don't get on at all. but i laughed in the bits that are funny, but i also cried, because i think it really deals with tragedy, it really deals with loss. it's really well filmed. there are moments in it that are almost transcendent. they are about, like with
11:56 pm
coco, life and death. the chaucerian ear for obscenity that martin mcdonagh has rings true. did you love it? with hindsight, i loved it. i wasn't sure as i was watching, but i think the script is terrific, and it's really stayed with me in a positive way. don't take somebody who doesn't like swearing. that goes without saying. that's the only caveat, isn't it, it's a very striking film. for dvd? so i am not a witch. it turned out in the outstanding debut category at the baftas. a satirical, surreal tale of a young girl who is given the chance to accept life as a witch, or turn into a goat. the director has done a brilliantjob. i thought it was a really remarkable feature, something which, yes, it's funny, yes, it's satirical, but it's also about misogyny and magic. one of those films, again, sometimes you're watching it and don't know whether to laugh or cry, and end up doing both. it's really well worth checking out.
11:57 pm
thank you, mark. a really, really intriguing week. and many more like that to come, because we're building up to awards season. plenty to come. a reminder, before we go, you will find all of the film news and reviews from across the bbc on the website. and you can find all our previous programmes on the iplayer as well. it's a cracking week. enjoy your cinema going. thanks for being with us. bye— bye. good evening, temperatures have already dropped well below —10 celsius across parts of scotland. very cold air in place and then into the equation we are going to add some wet weather. pushing in from the west of the rest of the night. this rain is likely to turn to snow across parts of northern ireland, wales through the early hours,
11:58 pm
likely to bring some significant issues with ice. look at the overnight lows, —13 over the snowfields of scotland quite easily, sunspots could get lower than that. there are in mind with the wet weather sliding into the cold weather sliding into the cold weather risks are some snow and ice which could cause trouble disruptions during tomorrow. this is hardly day panned out, the cold start in the wet weather sliding its way in from the midlands northwards, a spell of snow, especially over high ground although much of it will turn back to reign as the day goes on because the mild air will be working in, quite a windy day as well, real contrast in the temperatures in newcastle, 12 in plymouth, for the week ahead it looks much more mild, wind and rain to come at times. that is all from me for now. good night. this is bbc world news. i'm chris rogers. our top stories: afghan special forces respond after gunmen attack kabul‘s intercontinental hotel. a workerfrom
11:59 pm
a worker from the hotel approached and said a suicide attacker entered the hotel. turkey launches an air and ground assault against what it says are terrorist groups in northern syria. the blame game begins in washington, as republicans and democrats accuse each other of causing the us government shutdown. and farewell to the man they called the pope of gastronomy — tributes are paid to the celebrated french chef paul bocuse.
73 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
BBC News Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on