he too occurs replacement, lingard. he too occurs chance to prove he can still pause a threat. this is the fourth time that yeovil town have been knocked out of the fa cup by manchester united but being on television has been lucrative, for magister united it is not about finances, but prizes, and they are another step closer to winning another step closer to winning another trophy. no goals for alexis sanchez tonight. let's hear whatjose no goals for alexis sanchez tonight. let's hear what jose mourinho thought about his performance. alexis is a fantastic player for us. the question is always, which one is going to be out? where is he going to play? it is not about that for us. to play? it is not about that for us. for us, it is about the fact that we have a fantastic group of attacking players. and he is another one with oedipal bit more maturity, with a little bit more experience. he will bring us also this extra

maturity and class. i am pleased with him and he was keen to play. i knew that was going to be difficult. i knew that was going to be not an was \ place there e and it after australian opener travis head.

a few quick wickets did at least make this feel like a contest, including that of head, four short of his century. that was the only australian disappointment, victory was comfortable. adam wild, bbc news. play has been called off late on day three of the test match between south africa and india in johannesburg. chasing 241 to win the match in the final innings, south african batsman dean elgar was hit on the grille of his helmet by a short ball from india's jasprit bumrah. discussions took place between umpires aleem dar and ian gould, before match referee andy pycroft joined them

on the field and play was halted. the fourth round of the fa cup gets underway tonight with manchester even in a tournament full of upsets, few would forecast a downturn in fortunes from roger federer. with the roof closed in melbourne, the atmosphere and provide for his semifinal, but few things could distract the greatest. the swiss won the toss, electing to receive and showed his intent, breaking the unseeded outside at the first attempt. and early on, the south korean got in inkling luck wasn't going to be on his side. at 36, there are cracks appearing in federer‘s game. but at 21, chung lacked the experience to exploit them, resisting the inevitable was made harder by chung with his mobility hampered. federer was blistering, too, but with brilliance. it all proved too much, and trailing 5—2 in the second set, the pain was such that chung couldn't continue. it was a bittersweet victory for federer, i have blisters the

and past a lot and it hurts a lot. sometimes - can't take it? more past a lot and it hurts a lot. son you 1es - can't take it? more past a lot and it hurts a lot. son you realise can't take it? more past a lot and it hurts a lot. son you realise there take it? more past a lot and it hurts a lot. son you realise there is (e it fi more past a lot and it hurts a lot. son you realise there is no t fi more and you realise there is no way you can come back and you make things really works. it is better to stop, that's why this one feels bittersweet. i am incredibly happy to be finals, but not like this. he has played such a wonderful tournament, so credit for him. despite the pain of his defeat, chung can leave australia with his head held like am optimistic that his future is bright. for federer, a tougher challenge lies in wait with marin cilic standing between him and a 20th grand slam title. meanwhile the british pair of gordon reid and alfie hewett were left ruing a number of unforced errors as they lost the wheelchair doubles final to the french pair stephane houdet and nicolas peifer. the reigning us open and wimbledon champions were beaten 6—4 6—2 at melbourne park. simona halep and caroline wozniacki

try to win their first grand slam title. wozniacki will go above halep if she wins. sue barker spoke to us earlier and says the match has the potential to be a classic. to see these two that have fought for so long and come so close, both of them in two grand slam titles, one of them, finally, it will be third time lucky. towards the middle to end of their career as well, it is so exciting, and the number one ranking, there is so much at stake in the final tomorrow. we are in for a classic, two that scamper around the baseline, get everything back, counterpunch, we will see the longest, testing rallies, fantastic tennis to watch. do you think, bearing in mind how much a grand slam title will have weighed on their minds, that it may upset either one of them a bit more than the other? it is going to get very tight towards the end of the match. caroline wozniak you, even in the semifinal, she got types trying to

close out her match. she suffers with nerves possibly more than simona halep. it isjust a huge opportunity, you cannot not be affected. finally, your prediction? iam going affected. finally, your prediction? i am going with halep, but i think it will be long and tough, but somehow, ifeel it will be long and tough, but somehow, i feel that after the french open when she lost ostapenko, and it hurt her so much, i think somehow she will dig deeper and find the answers. but both have had match points against them coming through. they are such great fighters, but for me, halep isjust the they are such great fighters, but for me, halep is just the favourite. we will find out in tomorrow's final. sue barker in the studio early today. sophie hahn denies she is cheating the classification system and says it was heartbreaking to have her impairment question. the five—time world champion has cerebral palsy, but at a parliamentary hearing into classifications invigorate, the father of a team—mate said she benefited from competing in the wrong category. in herfirst

interview since then, she gave her reaction to the claims. i was very angry and upset. i never imagined seeing my face all over the internet, the newspaper and on the tv. for me, ijust worked unbelievably hard. i put in hours of training on the track. it's just very heartbreaking for me, and doesn't do the sport any good. we want to inspire people, we want people with disability to come and try it out. that's all from me and the rest of the sportsday team. from all of us, good night. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

bringing us tomorrow. with me are helen brand, chief executive of the association of chartered certified accountants and jason beattie, head of politics at the daily mirror. many of tomorrow's front pages are already in. the times reports that every rape case in england and wales could be reviewed by the crown prosecution service after the collapse of several trials over the failure to disclose evidence. the telegraph says the uk is in negotiations with the eu to extend the brexit transition period to nearly three years. the government, though has strongly denied the story. now you've got to be in agony to have a hip op is the headline in the daily mail which claims nhs trusts are turning down patients for routine hip replacements. the express leads with the rise in gdp. the uk economy rose by 0.5% in the last three months of the year, defying economists predictions.

a poll in the guardian shows support has grown for a second eu referendum. the icm survey says 47% of people want a second vote after the terms of the uk's withdrawal from the eu was clear. the ft reports on an apparent diplomatic rift between the uk and china that could threaten trade talks due to take place during the prime minister's visit to the country next week. the sun says that a darts governing body has banned women appearing on stage in a move the paper labels as political correctness going too far. and the mirror has the death of the wife of singer paul young. stacey young died today from brain cancer earlier today at the age of 52. and so a variety of stories vying for top billing across a range of tomorrow's papers. we are going to begin with the times, every rape case to be reviewed, trials faced delays as disclosure scandal mounts. this is because something like four rape

trials recently have collapsed, helen. yes, and it is having very serious consequences. first and foremost, obviously, miscarriages of justice need to be prevented. the nondisclosure, we have discussed it, surrounding incompetency is, and lack of resources, but it is serious that so many cases are falling by the wayside. following on from that, we know rape cases are underreported, under prosecuted and there aren't enough convictions that come through from rape cases. the effect it has on the women whose cases are already in process, all women who are thinking about coming forward , women who are thinking about coming forward, this throws all of that into doubt now and it is very concerning. whatever they do, it seems there isn't the trust in the justice system that the judiciary would want. helen is right. will

this deter women coming forward? they already have a lack of face that claims will be taken seriously. we should be quite careful. this is current rape cases, not historic ones. it's one is going through the courts at the moment. and it is off the back, as you said, of 2—3 cases where there has been miscarriages of justice. one particular one was liam alan, where his defence team asked for evidence and the police failed to hand it over and said it didn't exist. it was only when it got to court and a barrister said we need to see the evidence, and it turns out that the woman in question had been sending lots of texts of a flirtatious nature. therefore, the case collapsed and why didn't the police disclose that information?

this is the problem, are the police under resourced? that is one complaint. are they incompetent? or is there a greater conspiracy going on that they are trying to push through convictions to meet some sort of target? alison saunders was talking about that, she said that is absolutely not the case and rejected that entirely. let's move on, it wouldn't be a paper review without brexit, would it? we like brexit. i am excited by it. are you? yeah. 0k. ido am excited by it. are you? yeah. 0k. i do politics for a living. let's start with the daily telegraph, it is on three front pages. uk in talks over longer transition for brexit. .. the transition... david davis has been setting out what he thinks

transition should look like from a uk point of view. this is what happens, we actually leave officially the european union on 29th march next year, and then we go into a transition period where we don't leave at all. we then have two years, we we re don't leave at all. we then have two years, we were told, or around two years, we were told, or around two years, to actually prepare for leaving. even during transition, we have ad hoc membership of the eu, accepting the rules, freedom of movement, members of the single market, members of the customs union, under the jurisdiction of the european court of justice, union, under the jurisdiction of the european court ofjustice, all the things brexiteers hate. now we are told, strongly denied by downing street, the transition period could go on for three years. that is a possibility. i have spoken to very senior eu officials that say they don't want to go on beyond two years. but if we get to the stage that we haven't got our border systems in place, and we haven't got

the cheques ready, and we haven't sorted out regulatory alignment, and worked out membership of various agencies that matter, planes can't ta ke agencies that matter, planes can't take off because they can't get permission, because they are not regulated, we need to do that. that is why you can see the timescale slipping, and you can see the anger of brexiteers that want to leave now because our glorious future ahead of us because our glorious future ahead of us is not. that is why it's so matters. the government is angry or a categorical lie already. they have. shall we deal with the statement from downing street? this isa statement from downing street? this is a categorical lie, the time—limited period should be determined by the length of time it ta kes to determined by the length of time it takes to put in place new arrangements, and we believe it should be around two years. the telegraph is ranked a front—page article suggesting british officials are in discussions with brussels. they are in. business wouldn't like it to go on any longer, would they?

certainty is what is being looked for, currency is what is being looked for. we can only see an extended transition period injecting more uncertainty into the process. i think they're probably have been some discussions along these lines, whether it's as formal as is said here, because of the practical issues, it is a very practical process that needs to be gone through. shouldn't there be contingency plans and pays? nothing has worked out how anybody