it is what about full autos? -- for. it is about economics, and to have a great military you need a great balance sheet. as you were heading into the talks there was a sense that your closest allies were angry with you and you were angry with them. and you were going for more friendly talks with kim jong—un in singapore? do you view this the same way? who are row with? cnn. i figured, fa ke who are row with? cnn. i figured, fake news cnn. i had no idea after the question i was curious as to who you were with, i would say that the level of relationship is a ten. we have a great relationship. angela merkel and emmanuel and justin, i would say the relationship is a ten. i don't blame then, i blame our past

leaders for allowing this to happen. there was no reason i should happen. there was no reason i should happen. there is no reason we should have big trade deficits with every country in the world, i am going beyond the g7. it is the fault of the people that preceded me. and i am notjust the people that preceded me. and i am not just saying the people that preceded me. and i am notjust saying president obama, iam going am notjust saying president obama, i am going back a long way, you can go back 50 years frankly, it got worse and worse and worse, you know, we used to be a nation that was unbelievably cash flow oriented. had no debt of any consequence and they build a high way system, we built the interstate system out of virtually out of cash flow, and it was, it was a lot different. we have a very good relationship and i don't blame these people but i will blame them if they don't act smart and do what they have doers because they have to choice, i will be honest, they have no choice, they are going to make the trades fair because our farmers have been hurt. you look at

our farmers, farmers have been hurt. you look at ourfarmers, for 15 years, the graph is going just like this, down. our farmers have been hurt, our workers have been hurt, our companies have moved to mexico and other countries including canada. now we are going to fix that situation. and if it is is not fixed we are not going to deal with these country, but the relationship that i have had is great, you can tell that to your fa ke great, you can tell that to your fake friends at cnn. the relationship i have had with the people, the leaders of these countries has been, i would really rate it on a scale of 0—06789 i would rate it at 10. they doesn't meani would rate it at 10. they doesn't mean i agree with what they are doing and they know very well i don't, so we are negotiating very hard, tariffs, and barrier, as an example, the european union is brutal to the united states. they don't, and they understand that, they know it, i when i am telling them they are smiling at me, it is

like the gig is up. it is like the gig is up. they are not trying, there is nothing they can say. they can't believe they got away with it. canada can't believe they got away with it. mexico, we have a $100 billion trade deficit with mexico and that doesn't include the drugs that are pouring in. we started building the wall. $1.6 billion and which will keep that going. but, a lot of these countries smile at me when i am talking, and the smile is, we couldn't believe we got away with it. that's the smile. so it is going to change, it will change. they have no choice, if it doesn't we won't trade with them. how about a couple more. go ahead in this back. thanks mr president. going into these talks with kim jong un, mr president. going into these talks with kimjong un, do mr president. going into these talks with kim jong un, do you have a clear objective of what you want to get out of them? i have a clear objective, but i have to say that it

is going to be something that almost a lwa ys is going to be something that almost always be spur—of—the—moment. you don't know, this has not been done before, at this level. this is a leader who really is an unknown personality, people don't know much about him. i think that he is going to surprise on the up side, very much on the up side. we will see, but never been done, never been tested. many people, i am talking about world leaders who have been right next to him, have never met him. so we are going in, with a very positive spirit, i think very well prepared, i think and by the way, we have worked very well with their people. they have many people in shanghai, our people have been singapore, our people have been working very very well with the representatives of north korea. so we are going in with a positive altitude and i think we are going to come out fine, attitude. who knows, who know, may not, may not work out.

it isa who know, may not, may not work out. it is a good chance it won't work out. there is probably a better chance that it will take a period of time, it will be a process. reporter: is there any outcome you would look for from this reporter: is there any outcome you would look forfrom this initial talk tojudge whether you would look forfrom this initial talk to judge whether you think think things are going well? the minimum would be relationship. you would start a dialogue. as a deal person i have done very well with deal, what you want to do is start that. i would like to accomplish more than that, but at a minimum i believe at least we will have meet each other, we will have seen each other, hopefully we will have liked each other and we will start that process , each other and we will start that process, i would they will be the minimaland the process, i would they will be the minimal and the maximum i think you know the answer to that, but i think that will take a bit of time. ok. yes. reporter: how long do you think it will take you to figure out whether he is serious about... good question. i think within the first minute, i will know. how? question. i think within the first minute, iwill know. how? my touch, my feel, that is what i do. how long

will it take to figure out whether or not they are serious? i said maybe in the first minute, you know, the way they say that you know if you are going to like somebody in the first five seconds, you ever hear that one? i think that very quickly whether or not something goodis quickly whether or not something good is going to happen, i also think i will know whether or not it will happen fast. may not, but i think i will know quickly whether or not in my opinion something positive will happen. if i think i won't happen i am not going to waist my time. yes ma'am. reporter: are you concerned by giving kim the meeting he is getting a win? no, no, no. that is only the, only the fake news says that. look, we just only the fake news says that. look, wejust got only the fake news says that. look, we just got three hostaged back, only the fake news says that. look, wejust got three hostaged back, we paid nothing, they came back, they are happily enconed in their homes with theirfamily,

are happily enconed in their homes with their family, they are the happiest people in the world right now. we, we have gotten, you know, we haven't done anything, everyone said the hayter, they say oh, you are giving him a meeting, you reasons give me a break, ok. there is nothing, i think if i didn't do this, it would be and it has never been done before, and obviously, what has been done before hasn't worked. and this is something, i can't stress this strong enough, i talked about tariffs, that previous people and i am not looking to criticise people that were preceding me, but on tariffs, it should have never happened. the same thing on north korea. we shouldn't be in this position. we shouldn't be in this position. we shouldn't be in this position on tariffs where hundreds of billion billions of dollar down to other countries that we have never negotiated with, i asked a top person in china, how did it get so bad? person in china, how did it get so had? he looked happened. the same

thing on north korea. we shouldn't be in this position. we shouldn't be in this position on tariffs where hundreds of billion billions of dollar down to other countries that we have never negotiated with, i asked a top person in china, how did it get so bad? asked a top person in china, how did it get so had? he looked at me and said "nobody talked to us." they we re said "nobody talked to us." they were missing in action, our leaders. well, a very similar thing if you think about it, took place with north korea. this should not be done now, this should have been done five yea rs now, this should have been done five years ago, ten years ago, a 25 years ago. it shouldn't be done now? i can't comment on that. one more question. will you raise the issue of the gull lags. we are going to raise every issue. every issue is going to be raised. in canada you have attacked the us press back home but you have done it on foreign soil, i guess i would like to ask you why you do that? because the us press is dishonest, much of it. not all of it. i have some folks in your profession that are with the us, reporter, these are some of the most

outstanding people i know, but, there are many people in the press that are unbelievable dishonest. they don't cover stories the way they are meant to be, they don't even report them if they are positive. this tremendous, this, you know, i came up with the term, fake new, it is a lot of fake new, at the same timei new, it is a lot of fake new, at the same time i have great respect for many of the people in the press, thank you all very much. i appreciate it. thank you. that is the press conference there held by donald trump. he is leading the g7 summit —— leaving early to head to his next meeting inning singapore with kim jong un, head to his next meeting inning singapore with kimjong un, holding a summit there. in this coming week. key things really, saying that he wa nts key things really, saying that he wants no tariff, no subsidy, no barriers and as far as he is aware his relationship where the countries affected is a ten out of ten. he

doesn't blame then, he congratulates them for making the most of the trade relationships, getting away with it, the people he does blame are the former us leaders for letting that happen. spoke also about the summit, i have just mentioned it is unknown territory he said. he won't have this opportunity again, referring to kimjong un, it is isa again, referring to kimjong un, it is is a one time shot for him, and he says he will know within a minute whether there are good things to come, and final point quickly to make, is he was questioned also, commented also on russia, and his comments on allowing russia back in to the group of seven, would be the group of eight leaders meeting, russia of course was ousted back in 20001314 i russia of course was ousted back in 20001311; i believe it was, and he says it would be better, the g8 would be a better thing than the g7 as it is now, of course angela merkel saying there are many within

the g7 saying they would not want that to happen. we will get the latest from our correspondents gary donoghue later in the programme, who is following events at this summit in quebec. in the meantime you are watching bbc news. the housing charity, shelter, says more than a million people are stuck on waiting lists for social housing — often for years on end. figures from the charity show a national shortfall of 800,000 houses. the charity says the gap is caused by a lack of new—build social homes and has called on the government to build more. our correspondentjon donnison joins me now to tell us more. take us through how bad the figures are. one of the aroom alarming things from the figures is the fact that people are waiting for a long time, soa that people are waiting for a long time, so a million house holds are waiting for social housing, 65% of those households have been waiting for more than a year, 25% of them

have been waiting for more than five yea rs, have been waiting for more than five years, and in some cases, much longer than that. now the worst affected area, many of them were in london, and the south—east of england, no surprise there really because that is the most expensive area of the country, if you look at newham in london, then you have 26,000 households in newham alone waiting for social house, that is 1111 households for each unit of social housing available. thank you very much. with me now in the studio is freddy emmanuel. freddy has been on a west london waiting list for the past 18 years — and currently rents nearby. what is the reality for you? the reality is that they are forgetting about the actual people that need somewhere to stay, a lot of them actually are ending up on the

streets, and you have to consider young kids can see this happening and it could happen to them as well. 18 year, that is a long time, so what is your housing experience like? it has been a torment. i have thank my friends and my family for actually helping me through all this, because it is the fact that i have had a roof over my head always... have you ever slept rough at all. ? always? i have spent about two months ago —— actually living in the park. a park? yes. through the winter. what was that like? terrible. where are they going wrong in your opinion? you have been in the system, although not enough, what is it going wrong? it is going wrong where they do consider, well they don't consider the fact you are on the list. they forget about you? they do. you have to report to them

practically every week to let them know you are still alive. what does that mean for day—to—day life? day—to—day life meaning it is, it means you miss out on work, and then you have to find a means of getting food and also, a way of survival. have you got a family nfrnts yes i have. tell us what impact that has had, immediate family? immediate family, my kids, they don't get a ca ns family, my kids, they don't get a cans chance to come and visit, which means i haven't got accommodation for them to come and see me, then there is food, storing food, you have nowhere to store it you have to buy it op a daily basis, to actually feed yourself, otherwise that is it. what has this done do your mental wellbeing? mental wellbeing, what has this done do your mental wellbeing? mentalwellbeing, it what has this done do your mental wellbeing? mental wellbeing, it is kind of like you feel insecure,

u nsafe, kind of like you feel insecure, unsafe, and you always feel like you have to watch your back all the time. what would you like to say to the people that are in charge of those lists, say you had them face to face with you right now, what would you say? . i would say they need to get out of their office and look and see the people who are actually struggling, struggling. they will see what is going on, there is a lot of people out there, that are actually missing out, or being mistreated. ok, very quickly what do they say to you when you keep reporting, week after week? they will say, well, there is nothing yet. and when i actually asked to see someone, and find out why, they are actually not giving me accommodation, they basically blank me. ok,ed frommy, good luck with your —— freddie, good luck with your own ward search for a safe roof over your

a spokesman said everyone deserved a decent place to live and highlighted properties have been delivered since 2010. he said we are determined to do more and are investing £9 billion in affordable homes including 2 billion to help councilings and housing association build properties for social rent. goes on to say that we have also committed to giving councils the power to borrow one billion to build new properties in the areas, where they are, the greatest affordability pressures. the new adidas telstar 18. i wanted to find out what goes into the design behind this, so i've come to loughborough university to find out. this year's design is a model re—version of the iconic adidas ball from the 1970 world

cup, the telstar. but if you thought this was a case of aesthetics, think again. loughborough university have been researching for adidas for almost 20 years, and their rigorous testing facilities offer findings on how the ball moves and reacts in different situations. hi, andy. hi, kat. first up, the team use roboleg to recreate the kicks players make over and over again at different speeds and powers. we have a compromise here between the fluidity and flexibility of a human player but the repeatability of a machine. it needs to be a robot because even the best player in the world cannot kick a ball the same twice. yeah. so if we want to know how a ball‘s going to respond to a particular kick, we need the robot. let's see it in action then. i'm intrigued already that the foot appears to be in front of the ball. three, two, one... woah! ok, so it's fast. so, from our point of view, it would be understanding how long the boot is in contact with the ball, how the ball deforms, how it stores the energy, how it recovers that energy, and then that results in this sort of forward velocity and the spin that's imparted onto the ball into its flight. but what we've just seen in the roboleg really has to make sense in terms of the players.

and so capturing what a player does when they kick a ball in a lot of detail to give us the inputs that we need to control the kicking leg is absolutely vital. so down here, we have a motion capture space where we can actually capture a player kicking a ball in all the detail that we need. as well as robotic legs and motion capture technology, the team here work on computer simulations of footballs to try and figure out how they will respond before they're physically made. we are simulating certain aspects of the ball. in this particular case, it's the mechanical properties of the ball, it's the way that it deforms under different kicks or collisions against different surfaces. perhaps modelling the flight might be possible at some point in the future, but, for now, the way we do that is to look in the wind tunnel and actually do

experimental aerodynamic studies on real prototype balls. if i first show you something of the scale of what's involved in a tunnel like this. so, if we come outside, and you get a sense of the scale. so this is the air inlet, and then expelled out through this vent here to pass the air over at the sorts of speeds that the player will kick at. wow, i was not expecting this. two goalkeepers who have played friendlies with the new telstar 18 have already complained about the design. spain's david de gea said it was "strange," and his teammate, pepe reina, called for it to be changed. whether the world cup is the right time to focus on technological changes has been suggested, when players just want to perform at the top of their game. whether fans have anything to say about it will be seen when games start on the 14th. that was kat.

ok, ball done! but it's not just about what we kick. like many sports these days, data and technology are seeping into every element of the game. now, fifa has been notoriously slow at allowing technology into football, but this will be the first world cup where teams are given tablets to access data and analytics in—game. does that mean the data analysts will become the new star players? well, we sent paul carter to fifa to find out. at this year's world cup finals in russia, data is set to play a bigger role than ever before. like it or not, data is already an integral part of modern football. you can't watch a televised game without being bombarded by all kinds of statistics. for the first time, fifa are providing an all—in—one technical package allowing coaching staff and analysts to communicate throughout matches in real—time. the snappily titled electronic tracking and performance system —

or etps — will provide data on player metrics, such as distances run, speed and positional information. crucially, each of the 32 countries competing in the tournament will be provided with two tablets. one for a data analyst in the stands, who'll be able to communicate with the second device user on the bench, possibly a coach or assistant manager. we're using an optical tracking system. so we have optical tracking cameras in all of the stadiums. we know where the players and the ball are at any time of the match. we have different metrics available to the analysts, and it's up to them to decide how they want to use it. with resources available for technology differing between countries, fifa hopes this technology will bridge the data divide. a lot of the teams already use data. we're expecting a lot of the teams coming to russia to bring their own setup. but we want to at least offer the same to all of the teams. in fifa's system, the teams' data analysts will have access

to a tactical app, enabling them to add drawings over a live video feed. stills can then be sent to the dugout. with goalline technology, video assistant referees, and now etps, this year's world cup looks set to be the most technologically advanced ever. but with the technology, how big is the risk that we lose the real spirit of the game? the role of the data analyst is simply just to again support those coaching decisions. i think there are some key insights they can be found in the data. but football will always be those 22 players on the pitch, and the coach is always going to be the person making the decisions. at the end, what technology really is for is only to support. but at the end, you're a big football fan, i'm a big football fan, at the end, the 22 players plus the referee,

they are the main actors. 90 minutes, maybe penalty shootout, germany— england maybe! so that's the excitement. i think technology can only add additional help, optimise processes, optimise or providing additional information, that's what technology is about. well, i'm certainly nowhere near ready to head to a football pitch, i need some sort of training first. but luckily we've come across this robotic leg which aims to help. but i can see what the first problem is. this ur3 robot, originally built forfactory work, has already got its footy boot on. the idea is it can repeat a human's movement so they can be watched back and learned from, or it could be copying and teaching the kick of a star player from anywhere in the world. so here we have the setup. a kinect which will track the human's movements,

and the robot should be able to replicate them, and, of course, we've a goal, and we couldn't do it without one of these. that's the theory anyway, but it didn't gauge the angle of my foot very well, and even i know you're not meant to kick the ball with your toes. but i did still need a little help from a human expert to understand what else it was suggesting i did wrong. if we look closer to the robotic legs, we can... the leg, we can see that ankle here is very flexible. so it's actually copying every movement you were doing. so the first problem you've got is, when you're kicking a football, you have to open your arch. i followed the advice, it went to the right point of the net, i'm almost a professional! i've made it to an actual football pitch, albeit a five—a—side one, and i'm joined by the click team. what you think of our kits?

good, aren't they? so i need to do a bit more practice. they're kicking the ball around the old —fashioned way, but i've a smart football here, and i've got an app with some augmented reality built in. i've never done this before in my entire life. how am i meant to to speed it up? ok, toe—taps. dribbleup runs you through drills and training suitable for your ability. after placing the football in position, the app will scan it then track and assess your every move. it's all gone red, i think i'm doing it wrong. i'm not sure this isn't playing footbal! i've never seen anyone train for football like this before! strangely, it didn't seem to think i'd done too badly. i'm assuming these grades arejust for trying hard, because clearly i was absolutely ridiculous. it was quite fun, but i'm not sure that i actually really exercised any proper sort of skill. the app worked beautifully, it was lovely to look at, great instructions, but i don't think i was born to play football.

now i've got the moves, or not, it's time to learn some tactics. i need to actually be able to play the game. so some mixed reality is here to help. this is soccer training on the microsoft hololens, teaching the rules through a mixed reality game, a lot of words, and questions to check you've been paying attention. there's some text but i can't actually read the text properly. it's not in quite the right position. there we go, there's the goalkeeper, and it explains the offside position. the premise is good, i like the virtual players running about, but it does feel slightly hard work to watch, because naturally you want to watch the people, but you actually need to be reading the words. so i tried to kick a ball around, thinking about everything a robotic leg, a smart football and microsoft hololens experience had taught me. but through no fault of the tech, i'm still monumentally useless. stephen, look over there! oh! i had to find some way! that's it for the shortcut

of our world cup show. the full—length version is up on iplayer right now. next week, we're going to be in the united states for the e3 video game show in los angeles, and elsewhere in the country too. in fact, by the time you see this, we'll already be there tweeting @bbcclick, sojoin us there and see what we're up to. thanks for watching, see you in the states. good afternoon. it's a weekend of mixed fortunes. for many of us there's decent spells of sunshine, but if you have caught a shower you'll know about it — some of them are quite heavy and thundery.

the remainder of the weekend continues with a similar headline, really. most of the showers over the next few hours confining themselves across the highlands, into the north—west of england and maybe northern ireland, and one or two perhapsjust down to the south. but pleasant enough this evening for a barbecue. if you are spending some time outside, i don't think you will be too disappointed, and the showers will start to fade away overnight tonight, and we will see those lows perhaps dipping down to around nine to 1a degrees. so we start off tomorrow morning with a little bit of early morning mist and fog, a lot of low, grey cloud, but the sunshine will quickly burn that away, just like today, and the emphasis is with a dry settled story for most of us. if you catch a shower, and these may welljust be that little bit further east in scotland and northern england and one or two into wales and the south—west. highest values again of 23 degrees. enjoy. this is bbc news. i'm lukwesa burak.

the headlines at four. donald trump leaves the g7 summit, saying he has had ‘extremely constructive' talks on trade, and the us wants fair market access and an end to unfair trading practices. it's going to change 100%. and ta riffs it's going to change 100%. and tariffs are going to come way down because people cannot continue to do that. we're like the piggy bank that everybody is robbing, and that ends. the queen's birthday honours are announced — and there's anger as the chief executive of network rail, mark carne — is made a cbe, despite the recent chaos on the railways. amongst other names on this year's list are former liverpool manager kenny dalglish — who's knighted — and actress emma thompson — who's made a dame. more than 65 people die after taliban fighters launch