tuesday. much of the week. this is tuesday. the south—westerlies, the humid, the warm air, it is in place in england and wales. to the north, cool conditions. 1a in the lowlands. ran in northern ireland and conditions. 14 in the lowlands. ran in northern ireland and also western pa rt in northern ireland and also western part of scotland later on in the day. —— rain. a weatherfront. this is the cool front. drawing a line from the middle of the north sea to the midlands down to the south—west. this is the boundary zone separating the warm air. look at that. squeezing to the south—east. temperatures, 26, 27, by the time you get to manchester, 20. newcastle, 16. sunshine here. thursday, high pressure building in the uk. the wind is blowing around like so in a clockwise fashion. that means cooler red will be streaming in from the north. —— air. cooling

off in the south of the country. good night. hello. this is bbc news. we'll be taking a look at tomorrow mornings papers in a moment — first the headlines. the prime minister announces an extra £20 billion a year in real terms for the nhs. labour says it's not enough. that will be through the brexit dead—end, the fact that we are no longer sending vast amounts of money every year to the eu once we leave the eu and we as a country will be contributing a bit more. look, if this was me, they will be saying it is a magic money tree. this is a mining, it magic money forest, there is no certainty whatsoever. —— forest, there is no certainty whatsoever. — — this forest, there is no certainty whatsoever. —— this is a magic money forest. the hundreds of migrants rescued off the libyan coast have now arrived in spain. their plight had sparked a row between european union member states over who should've accepted them.

there are fears that the glasgow school of art, which was ravaged by a fire on friday night, may have to be knocked down. a team of women plan to steal a necklace. find out what mark thought about that and the week ‘s top cinema releases in the film review. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are rob merrick, deputy political editor at the independent and ruth lea, economic adviser at the arbuthnot banking group. many of tomorrow's front pages are already in. the guardian reports that theresa may's £20 billion cash boost for the nhs has been overshadowed by scepticism from experts and tory backbenchers. the financial times also says mps

from her own party questioned the idea of a so—called brexit dividend to support the health service. the times claims ministers were unable to agree on where all the money would come from, before the prime minister made the announcement. the metro also questions where the cash will come from to fund what's been described as a ‘70th birthday present‘ for the nhs. the i leads with the same story and raises the issue of how it'll fix the problem of social care. meanwhile, the daily telegraph says hidden taxes will help pay for the increase in nhs spending. the front page of the daily express claims people should eat their way back to health rather than take prescription drugs to beat heart disease, that's according to experts. and the sun is looking forward to england's first game in the world cup against tunisia tomorrow. many of the papers leading on the

nhs story and theresa may's announcement. we will start off with the financial times. robert, you will kick us off years. —— here. facing tory backlash over funding of £20 billion nhs boost is the headline. yes, everybody spent the day poring over the details of the ins and outs, which came on this morning ‘s paper is. deciding that it raises more questions than it a nswe i’s. it raises more questions than it answers. there is simply no detail as to how the £20 billion for the nhs will be funded and the pm has made his contribution claim that there is a brexit dividend, which has been aggressively dismissed by independent experts. the ft‘s take here, as we saw, the labour shadow chancellor to attack the doubts

about its funding, there has been a backlash from tory mps, in particular sarah wollaston on the head of the commons health committee, very respected and knows her health stuff. she described the claim that it will come from a brexit dividend as nonsense and treating the public as fool ‘s. brexit dividend as nonsense and treating the public as fool 's. she would say that, wouldn't she? treating the public as fool 's. she would say that, wouldn't sham treating the public as fool 's. she would say that, wouldn't she? it is a tough task to win over even some of mps, claiming on funding. i am also struck ivy i met at times picking up on the pm saying that the nhs is the number one priority, which is close to her saying it is her mission. i have been watching the pm when it comes to missions, she said that housing is a mission, mental health is a mission. she has taught —— had more missions than captain cook. route, you are the money person. take us through those figures are. the first thing to say that i do think there is a brexit

dividend and i will explain in a minute. i know you and i don't agree but i am the economist and you are not. the second thing is, i do think the dividend will not be to actually provide. we are talking that taxes andi provide. we are talking that taxes and i suspect they will not be that stealth either. there was no pledges, i remember in the manifesto la st pledges, i remember in the manifesto last year, for the conservative party saying that they would not put up party saying that they would not put up contributions are. when it comes to the brexit dividend, i have heard co nfe re nce to the brexit dividend, i have heard conference of rubbishing about it but people like the institute of fiscal studies. you mean the facts. hear me out, young man. laughter. the truth is, what they do, i started my career in the treasury, i do know something about this. they did some forecast and did some forecasting for the financial receipts, now they are forecasting

lower growth and lower financial receipts and they are treating this to brexit. he could be that the forecasting was rubbish in the first place which is a good probability. the truth is that they really do not know the effects of brexit, you can'tjust say know the effects of brexit, you can't just say there is a brexit dividend, but having said that, it is not enough. let's turn to the mail, going on the nhs story. however, the paper saying, let's go to waron nhs however, the paper saying, let's go to war on nhs waste. theresa may has said that she doesn't want this money to go on administration and aspects like that, she wants it to go into real usage for the nhs. the paper is saying, let's sort out waste and bureaucracy. i think even roof and i disagree, we will probably agree that this is the most... i loved it. will probably agree that this is the most dishonest take of all. the idea that tackling waste could find £20

billion for the birds. the nhs has had eight years of austerity, whatever fat there was as big cut out already. i see the trail of her speech and this is the main thrust of it, that she has declared war, as she says, on the waste. the last desperate refuge of the politician. she is clearly tried to find a new way of avoiding entering the questions of weeks —— which tax rises there will be. is addressing the mail is going with this, they are standing by her, a little bit critical recently and brexit, but are prepared to stand by her and agree on a war of waste. a very different approach to mail ta kes to a very different approach to mail takes to the pm. when she talks about bureaucracy, what will they have? another reorganisation please

do like? it gets rear organised every five years. the problem is is that it every five years. the problem is is thatitis every five years. the problem is is that it is almost a bottomless pit of funding that they quote need over the next 20, 30, 40 years because we have an ageing population and increasingly expensive treatment. you have to go back to square one and say how are you going to find that service in this country? yes, you still have a lot of taxpayer funding but is it time to start thinking about co— funding and actually making people contribute more to their own healthcare? i know that you are pulling a face because you are rightfully independent. but the truth is, i think they have actually got to get on top of getting more money into the health service and you have to consider some private funding. after all, other companies do it, why not ours? a number of bodies, think tanks in response to this have said i think we actually need to see what the nhs can and cannot do any more. they

have to decide what they call services are and what can be funded by taxpayer funding. let's scoot on to the daily telegraph. is angela merkel being thrown a lifeline. life is almost as tough for her as it is for theresa may, problems in her coalition because of her previous opened or policy to migration. has been a backlash in germany against the number of migrants that she is prepared to let in when times were particulate of a couple of years ago. what this story says in her coalition partners are prepared to give her a little bit longer to find an eu agreement across the continent to share the burden, if you like, of finding homes for the number of refugees who are arriving. it does seem as refugees who are arriving. it does seem as if it will only be a brief lifeline because at the eu summit in a couple of weight she will have two try and persuade countries to find a fair way of taking in migrants and

so fair way of taking in migrants and so far that has proved impossible. is hard to see why there will be a success in two weeks time in their hasn't so far. kind of reunifying europe again. it is, she is very vulnerable, the home results in the election were poor. she not only had to go into coalition with the csu, threatening her position because the head of the csu is the interior ministerand he head of the csu is the interior minister and he was talking about unilateral action against migrants coming into germany. now that is dangerous. that is a real dangerous approach to angela merkel. she is vulnerable, but he seems to have backed off. the times, going back to health. insecure millennials. already insecure millennials are set foran already insecure millennials are set for an unhealthy middle—aged. already insecure millennials are set for an unhealthy middle-aged. poor old millennials, they probably thought that they had got the bad news already. baby boomers have

taken all the decent pensions and the free education and the rising house prices and millennials are faced with the prospect of almost certainly never owning a property and a life in the big economy and insecure employment. is about to get worse. according to the health foundation, it is that very lifestyle that means that millennials are set for an unhealthy middle—aged. apparently that security in employment leads to such psychological stress, they are on social media, living in poor rented it accommodation, high pollution, crime rates and the rest of it. enough to drive into drink and drugs, except for the fact that they are giving those things up and take waste. -- take less. any solutions? i thought it was the baby boomers who have been driven to drink. i think half of their problem, they look at the healthy to me, but they

are only in their 20s and 30s. i think this business about social media, we have the story about this gaming and session. people don't get out enough, they don't have enough social interaction and i think that is actually quite damaging. people don't know how, they don't understand social cues and how to interact. let's move on really quickly. back to the telegraph. david dimbleby, at the end of the year will be stepping down from question time to do something that he loves it. reporting. he has been in russia, terrific. good theme. will you miss him? i think it is time for a change? we have come up with a list, actually. there are are very able presenters. jane garvey, ki rsty very able presenters. jane garvey, kirsty wall holst. emma barnett, who i know who has been a big hit when she stood in the. time for a change. let's end on the world cup. let's

turn to the sun. roos didn't want to talk about this. icac is not interested. i made a point of trying to get my cats into it. my cats are saying they are not interested. 0k. all rights. apparently england was that success or failure comes down to whether we all kiss harry kane's boot. if we all kiss the boot which is pictured on the front of the sun then he is more likely to score a hat—trick in night against tunisia. a p pa re ntly hat—trick in night against tunisia. apparently he promised to do, which seems a bit unlikely and unwise. we tried everything else, kissing harry's boot is probablyjust as good a chance. i hope they go far through the tournament. even if not, to the finals of. a great young team and we are behind england, aren't we? come on. definitely. hurray!

thank you so much. that is it for the papers.