tv The Papers BBC News March 1, 2019 10:45pm-11:01pm GMT
10:45 pm
this is bbc news. have you picked up the latest the headlines at 11:00pm: comment michelle bandy a? we have the government agrees to pay £33 million to eurotunnel to settle a lawsuit over extra ferry services been busy working. saw earlier this evening he says i don't think there in the event of a no—deal brexit. will be a fundamental objection to labour says the transport secretary, extending brexit dates, but there chris grayling, has made too many must be a clear purpose for mistakes in government extension. earlier on you said there had not been any change whatsoever, so he does say thanks, doesn't it? i and needs to go. suppose he has got people to play too. there are some very clear reasons for an extension, i wrote he stumbles from catastrophe this month ago, and at that time... to disaster, and it's just gross you will have to have an extension incompetence on a industrial scale. to brexit whether you are going to enough is enough, and he must be out doa to brexit whether you are going to do a deal, or have theresa may's of his post by monday. deal, because the amount of red it an indian fighter pilot shot down legislation we have to get through, by pakistan over disputed kashmir is handed back to delhi, reducing tensions between there is about 13 different bits of the nuclear—armed states. a man who filmed his girlfriend legislation we have on the past as she was dying after giving her five. so that's common sense, you drugs is given 8.5 years injail. and what exactly is under have to have an extension for the surface of mars? theresa may's deal to get through. we have about 600 pieces of secondary legislation, we have only past about 200 of those. they have to go through parliament too. if you
10:46 pm
are going to have no deal, if you are going to have no deal, if you are going to go to a different terms you have to have a trade deal, services bill, you have to have those 600 bits of extra paperwork, the statutory, that each average 29 pages each, they have to be scrutinised by parliament. for the minor regulations we need to change outs of about 12,000 odd to eu rules we are otherwise of adopting straight into our legislation anyway, and you can't go to no deal in any kind of order and a semblance of you know roughly being the same as it was before unless you pass that legislation. no matter what you do you have to extend past march 29. we do not have time. we haven't had time since christmas or even before then to get that worked on. parliament has spent two and half years dealing with the hardliners arguing about all of that stuff, when they should've had a plan to start with. they need to sort all of that out. we will discuss that in the next addition of the papers, 0k,
10:47 pm
we will discuss that in the next addition of the papers, ok, let's turn to the financial times, you got really excited about this.|j turn to the financial times, you got really excited about this. i am very excited about this. we have got good news about dirty money. if you remember in 2015 the panama papers scandal embarrassed david camera, remember him? the guy who has a shepherd's heart now, it turns out his father had done some investment in panama which he benefited from. asa in panama which he benefited from. as a result of that he announced that the british government was going to make sure that all our offshore tax haven at principalities and co—dependencies, whatever you wa nt and co—dependencies, whatever you want to call them, would have public registers of their shareholders. we we re registers of their shareholders. we were going to clean up, and be better than this. and then parliament legislated took years to do it, and parliament said rights, we wanted this put in place by 2020, and thena we wanted this put in place by 2020, and then a few weeks ago the government reinterpreted it, and when i say reinterprets, i mean they changed it. theresa may's government which is so busy with brexit has no bandwidth for other stuff, said what
10:48 pm
we want to do is have a plan in place by 2020, and we will do it sometime in the future, because places like jersey and our foreign territories said if you do this, it will be constitutional problems, we will be constitutional problems, we will lose business, and you have enough problems with brexit, and we are all going to pile and if you do this to us, we will lose money. so what has happened here, the story is, andrew mitchell tory mp, everyone remembers him, labour, and got together and had a cross party move, they have got 20 tories behind their move, which is enough to swing theresa may vote. to say no, parliament said he would do this by 2020, we were promised it in 2015, you will do it by 2020. this is a side effect of brexit, this is a side effect of brexit, this is a side effect of theresa may having a wafer thin majority, and it's a side effect of people having to co—operate and work across the chamber now, as we have seen with the independent group, and we have
10:49 pm
seen with other groups. i think they ca re seen with other groups. i think they care about corruption. we cared at the time, because it was one of those stories that built and built. too this is something that most people are going to go whatever. the point as it is a good story. not only is the thing that we we re story. not only is the thing that we were promised is finally going to happen, we have assigned your cross party at cooperation, which is a wonderful thing to hear about after the last three or four years we have had. parliament, which is sovereign, forcing the executive to do what it doesn't want to do. the best thing about the story though is the fact that it's about dirty money, and just above it you have how to buy an island, a beginners guide. iwant just above it you have how to buy an island, a beginners guide. i want to read that now. as you say michael, a lot of the public will be looking at that and going yeah sure, let's see if they really do it. it's one of those stories where we were excited at the time, journalists got excited at the time, journalists got excited at the time, i did open the real world people care. i think the
10:50 pm
general public were discussing it, but then moved on. it's good that they got their act back together and mps are doing something. they are roasting the governments heels on over the fire over something that isn't brexit. there are things that are going on out there that need fixing. jersey is upset though they said it will trigger a constitutional crisis. they are self—governing, apart from that... about fixing things... it looks like bennett could face... his favourite shop we were told. a lot of wedges. i used to see wedges, i walked past it every day on the way to work i think of the duchess of cambridge, that's how i think about it. unfortunately, they have had a bit of a problem, they currently lie 6 million in the year sincejuly, restructuring costs, they are not blaming brexit in any way. how can you blame expensive
10:51 pm
wedges on brexit? you can't, can you? this is of the latest chapter in the death of the high street, which is linked to the internet and oui’ which is linked to the internet and our society and how we do our shopping. it is also a sign of high street really being stuck in its ways, you have got to shop here, rememberthere ways, you have got to shop here, remember there will be thousands of people who may lose theirjobs over this, so it's more thanjust a store. they probably are. i don't know, i don't shop in the north. no? no i don't shop there. when you say expensive, it is isn't it? i have seen a lot of critics say, i think it is, but it's one of those ones where it's not the top level, but they are charging top level. so the people who have been attracted to it in the past have suddenly seen the price go up a little bit, and the price go up a little bit, and the back of publicity from the likes of the duchess of cambridge, so maybe they just got a of the duchess of cambridge, so maybe theyjust got a little bit biggerfor
10:52 pm
maybe theyjust got a little bit bigger for their maybe theyjust got a little bit biggerfor their boots. maybe theyjust got a little bit bigger for their boots. that's what i've been reading today. or big for their wedges. noah monster play in oui’ their wedges. noah monster play in our current climate 200 quid for a dress or shoes. or you can say, you can get something better, so if all you can say about your brand is that kate middleton, who is relatively bland and boring, sorry duchess of cambridge, and theresa may are some of your more famous people who are wearing your stuff is very middle range. it won't excite anybody if megan margolis there doing their shopping, they would sell out. but meg margo wouldn't be seen dead in that. not everyone can be at the top of game all the time. this is a sign of a healthy high street is that you are flexible and you change and you bring a new start and you try to diversify and you keep your core customers happy and find other ones. every season, wedges again. you only know about one kind of shoe. i thought about high heels, that's not right. our final paper is the
10:53 pm
daily mail. what is this about carry—on criminals? it's not funny unfortunately. does make things that they love, criminals, and aren't they awful? a thing we can be agreeing with that to be fair. it's also a changing to the bail rules because of unfair prosecutions, which they also love campaigning about, in particular they did a story about... journalists on bail. held on bail for long periods, a year or so, big restrictions on what they do, this was unfair, and just as delayed because it'sjustice was unfair, and just as delayed because it's justice denied. was unfair, and just as delayed because it'sjustice denied. has a result of this the government change the rule on bail, and you can now bail someone under restrictions for a year or two years while you investigate them, so instead the government of course investigate them, so instead the government of course you investigate them, so instead the government of course you have an opportunity to improve the situation but managed to make it slightly worse, shall i say to be polite and they brought in something called released under investigation, so there is no restrictions on the suspect, but they are still being
10:54 pm
investigated, now the end was that when the police arrest somebody, they are supposed to decide within 28 days whether they should charge them or not, but the police didn't get any extra resources to make that decision into their investigations. so rather than meet that to 28 day deadline on bail, they go we are not under bail, we will under investigate you but go about your business. why can't they use common sense, because i think the people like those journalists didn't pose a threat to anyone, whereas these guys that they are talking about, there is one guy here a thief accused of going out 107 offences within three months of his arrest. burglary are not the top of the priorities been. it you know that guy is going to go out and do it again. going back to someone like paul, someone going back to someone like paul, someone like these journalists, they we re someone like these journalists, they were accused of fairly crimes that you didn't expect... you wouldn't expect them to, it was the use of bailing the sense, it wasn't being used in a common—sense matter, now
10:55 pm
they have gone the other way and not using a common—sense mentorfor these people who are clearly are career criminals, and that's what people are not understanding. why don't use bail on them then? the thing is if police are arresting someone thing is if police are arresting someone for a crime, and one in every seven is rearrested for committing another offence at a later date, but this shows that police are arresting the right people, because it turns out they are the criminals. because they commit again. why don't we address your questions at the end of the next half—hour, because we are out of time. too ok. yell maggie out. come back at 1130, that is it for the papers for this hour. thank you to michael and susie, i am back at the top of the hour in less than five minutes with the headlines. see you then. hello there, there is a storm on the way this weekend on sunday which
10:56 pm
could cause some disruption and some minor damage, more on that and just a moment. in the meantime we've got, whether in... spitting across the country there tonight bringing out bricks of rain, some heavy across western h ills bricks of rain, some heavy across western hills it will tend to peek out as it arrives across more eastern parts of scotland. so by the end of the night will dry up a little bit across some western areas, a clear spell. some areas staying murky and cloudy, tempter is not falling much below 5—7dc. so for that we very unsettled, extremely u nsettled that we very unsettled, extremely unsettled compared to how this week started with all the warmth and the sunshine, we will have our first area of low pressure arrived on saturday, this is going to bring a speu saturday, this is going to bring a spell of rain and scales initially to western areas, but actually for saturday morning we are starting off on quite a fine note once we lose the cloud from the eastern areas, lots of sunshine, old west end will be windier, cloudier, wetter, with outbreaks of rain becoming more persistent and heavier with gales, 50-60 persistent and heavier with gales, 50—60 mph gusts. a nice day across
10:57 pm
the eastern side of england with some sunshine, temperatures run 14-15d. this some sunshine, temperatures run iii—15d. this is a storm freya now, it has been named, it is going to impact good portions of england and wales as we head through the course of sunday. so we start sunday off on a dry bright note across many central areas, windy with a lot of showers across scotland, winter on the hills, across the south, * freya will arrive through the afternoon bringing spells a very heavy rain, which will move northwards and strong winds as well. temperature wise just about double figures, but it will be a bit cooler than that further north. now storm freya is likely to affect portions of england and wales, but it's the western side of this area which we are most concerned about, very strong winds. gusts of 60—70 mph near the coast. inland, as the storm moves, we could see 50—60 mph, but there could be a few spots of exposure along the coast of northwest england, which could see 80 mph. this is
10:58 pm
52 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
BBC News Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on