iran's admission that it accidentally shot down a ukrainian airliner killing all on board, has prompted angry protests on the streets of the capital, tehran. some demonstrators are calling for the country's supreme leader to step down. president trump has expressed his support for the protestors. after weeks of criticism over the handling of australia's bushfire emergency, the country's prime minister has admitted he could have done things differently. scott morrison says he'll propose a powerful inquiry, a royal comission. he also announced a fund of $76 million australian to help those affected. a man has died from a new pneumonia virus in the central chinese city of wuhan. 41 other people have also been diagnosed with the virus that investigators say resembles sars, another respiratory virus. the authorities in singapore, south korea and hong kong are monitoring travellers from wuhan.

now it's time for a look back at the week in parliament. hello, and welcome to the week in parliament. was this the moment mps started to get brexit done? the ayes to the right, 330. the noes to the left, 231. the iran missile crisis. the prime minister lists the charge sheet against its military chief. and, of course, supplying explosive devices to terrorists who i'm afraid killed and maimed british troops. that man had the blood of british troops on his hands. the end of the peers show — but what should a second chamber do? unless we start by saying what do we think the house of lords is for,

and once we have agreed on that, i think the options on how you compose that body will almost naturally flow from itself. and, how should the uk mark its departure from the eu? will he make representations to the house of commons commission whose decision this is that big ben should bong for brexit? but first, a big moment for brexit. we are now a step nearer leaving the eu at the end of this month. the bill to put borisjohnson's brexit deal into law cleared the house of commons on thursday evening. the ayes to the right, 330. the noes to the left, 231. so, the ayes have it, the ayes have it. a government majority of 99 — that's what you might call a meaningful vote after all the failed attempts to get the brexit deal through the commons. the withdrawal agreement bill covers divorce payments to the eu, citizens‘ rights, customs arrangements for northern ireland

and the planned ii—month transition period. mps had spent three days debating the details. but with a majority of 80, no opposition attempts to change it stood a chance of success. that didn't stop them trying. labour will continue to fight to protect the most vulnerable. we may not win many votes in parliamentjust now but we can win the moral argument. labour will continue to fight to protect the most vulnerable. we may not win many votes in parliamentjust now but we can win the moral argument. and of course sir keir starmer hopes to do that as labour leader. thursday also saw what's likely to be the last brexit questions in the commons — the department for exiting the eu is due to be wound up at the end of the month — the brexit secretary's job will disappear with it. there was a valedictory air to question time.

during the three years the department has been in place, it has had three secretaries of state and three permanent secretaries but since the first departmental question, just one shadow brexit secretary. without in any way wishing tojinx his next steps, may i... ..place on record his contribution to the scrutiny of the government, which i am sure will continue in whatever role he plays in the house moving forward. so no more knife—edge votes at westminster, but the uk government has failed to win the backing of the scottish parliament. msps voted by 92 votes to 29 against giving formal consent to the withdrawal agreement bill. the scottish government's brexit secretary said scottish voters had shown repeatedly that they don't want to leave the eu. that message has been related time and time again. that message to the prime minister is as clear today as it was yesterday and will be tomorrow. let me put it this way — prime minister, we said no

to brexit and we mean it. but presiding officer, the prime minister is not listening to the scottish people, just as his party in scotland, as we hear, is not listening. because, in three weeks‘ time, it is virtually certain that scotland will be taken out of the european union against our will. and we will, each of us, be forcibly stripped of our european citizenship against our specific wishes. that is an intolerable situation, and this parliament, as the voice of scotland, must say so. and wales‘s first minister mark drakeford says assembly members should vote down the bill when it comes before the senedd. the fact of brexit is undoubtedly now there. nobody should believe that that means somehow that is a blank cheque for a uk government to do things in a way that would cause enormous damage to the welsh economy and to welsh interests. and we will continue to argue, wherever we can, to make sure that those interests are properly defended.

mark dra keford, with a hint of trouble ahead. so, let's take stock of where we are with a real—life expert, professor anand menon of the uk in a changing europe thinktank at king's college, london. the bill sailed through the commons — what did we learn along the way? well, i think that older people like me have remembered and younger people will have heard what it was to have a majority government. will have because all of a sudden, this government is going to win all the votes. and you see opposition parties wondering about amendments but knowing that ultimately, unless they get the support of the government, they are not going to go through. and we have just learnt what power borisjohnson has at his disposal, at the moment at least. so, it's going his way so far. the bill will now go to the house of lords. could anything go wrong there? the house of lords will grumble and quibble, i'm sure about that. but, remember, all the key elements

of what is in this bill were part of the conservative manifesto so i find it very hard to believe that the lords are going to kick up too much of a fuss, and even if they do, going back to that majority again, they can be overruled by the house. and what are the sort of thing is that they would grumble about? well, several things. for instance, this version of the withdrawal agreement bill has removed parliamentary scrutiny over certain things, and i think that has caused some concern in parliament, but again, well, on the one hand, you can wonder why a government with a majority of 80 would bother doing that, on the other, there is not much that opponents can do. there is some slight concern, interestingly, in brussels, about some phraseology in the bill that says the institution being created to monitor eu citizens‘ rights could be replaced by another one. and you‘ve heard some rhetoric from the other side of the channel that actually they are a bit concerned about this. i wouldn‘t be at all surprised if you don‘t hear that being debated in the house of lords as well.

and closer to home, the signs are that the scots and the welsh will withhold their consent from this bill. is that a practical problem or a political one? it is more of a political one. i don‘t think we‘ve had a piece of legislation go through without the consent of both the scottish and the welsh before. and the main political issue here is the scots because the snp are obviously pushing this line that we have a mandate for another referendum because of the outcome of the general election, and they will use brexit to try and strengthen that cause. and if we think as far back as last month, there was a queen‘s speech, and there were other bills in that queen‘s speech that focused on life after brexit. the government will presumably need to get these past this year. the government will need to get them past this year but until we reach the end of the year, we are essentially in the single market, in the customs union, we still have freedom of movement, all those things about trade bills and all those things to do with our new immigration policy will need to be in place for after that. so, we are talking about things like immigration, environment... agriculture. fisheries. yes, agriculture, fisheries. there are many areas of public policy where essentially the eu has

substituted for westminster, fisheries, agriculture, immigration when it comes to europeans, we will need to devise policies of our own in those areas, we might need to devise new policies and new spending commitments for things like research for things like regional spending. all the things where the eu used to play a large role. and, of course, not being in the eu any more, depending on the deal we negotiate, they might not play that role in the future. and a lot of those things will need to be done by december the 31st. yes, absolutely. because there is still a very real prospect we will end up leaving the european union with no trade deal in place. if they can‘t reach agreement or if the agreement can‘t be ratified, then ultimately we are trading with the european union on wto terms, and there are no special arrangements for anything. professor menon, thank you very much. it was a week dominated by international tensions — by what‘s been called the iran missile crisis, prompted by the killing of the iranian army chief qasem soleimani. on tuesday night, ballistic missiles were fired at two air bases in iraq where us and uk forces are stationed. iran‘s revolutionary guard said the strikes were in retaliation for the assassination of general soleimani on the orders of donald trump.

the crisis and how to respond to it dominated the first prime minister‘s questions since the general election. mr speaker, i should begin by saying that we of course condemn the attack on iraqi military bases hosting coalition forces. iran should not repeat these reckless and dangerous attacks but must instead pursue urgent de—escalation. the labour leader wanted the prime minister to confirm his opposition to any retaliation or further escalation of the crisis. following the government's support for the united states over the assassination of general soleimani, is the prime minister confident that united kingdom troops and civilians are not at further risk in the region and beyond? mr speaker, i can of course confirm, and that is an important question, that as far as we can tell, there were no casualties last night sustained by the us, and no british personnel were injured in the attacks. the government has said

that it is sympathetic to the assassination of general soleimani. what evidence has the prime minister got to suggest that this attack on him and his death was not an illegal act by the united states? well, mr speaker, clearly, the strict issue of legality is not for the uk to determine since it was not our operation. but i think that most reasonable people would accept that the united states has a right to protect its bases and its personnel. and i would remind the house that the individual concerned, qasem soleimani, was not only responsible for many years, amongst other things, arming the houthis with missiles with which they attacked innocent civilians, arming hezbollah with missiles, which again they used to attack innocent civilians, sustaining the assad regime in syria, one of the most brutal and barbaric regimes in the world, and of course supplying improvised explosive devices to terrorists

whom i‘m afraid killed and maimed british troops. that man had the blood of british troops on his hands. mr speaker, if we stand by international law, as i'm sure the government does and would want to, then surely killing somebody in a foreign territory is an illegal act and should be condemned as such? this government's response is not putting the interests of this country first but instead seems more interested in prioritising the prime minister's relationship with president trump over the security of the region and of this country. isn't the truth, mr speaker, that this prime minister is unable to stand up to president trump because he has hitched his wagon to a trade deal with the united states and that prioritises everything else

that he ought to be considering? well, mr speaker, i was waiting for the little green men thing to come out at the end of that, about the trade deal. this is absolute fiction. but what i will say is that the uk will continue to work for de—escalation in the region. i think we are having a great deal of success in bringing together a european response and in bridging that, the european response with that of our american friends, and working both with the iranians and with the iraqis to dial this thing down. later, in a phone call, the prime minister told the iranian president hassan rouhani there should be an end to hostilities. that was before evidence emerged that suggested an iranian surface—to—air missile brought down a ukrainian passenger plane that crashed near tehran. four britons were among the 176 people who died in the crash shortly after take—off. borisjohnson said information suggests the plane was shot down, but "this may well have been unintentional". let‘s have a look at some westminster news in brief now.

and where better to start than with some election news? three new deputy speakers have been elected by mps — nigel evans, dame rosie winterton, and dame eleanor laing. dame eleanor is the most senior of the three, and will chair budget debates. the first one to be elected is dame eleanor laing... cheering. ..was elected the first ever woman to be — first woman to be elected chair of westminster. cheering. you‘re clapping whatever we do! "no clapping," said the speaker, but he did call it a historic occasion. you intend to do a lot to bring this

place into the 21st century, and to restore faith in our democracy. and i look forward to doing all i can to helping you. thank you very much. cheering. dominic cummings, the prime minister‘s controversial adviser, prompted a stir with a government recruitment drive launched on his personal blog. the debate spilled over into treasury questions. the prime minister‘s special adviser now wants a civil service packed in the cabinet comprised of weirdos and misfits with odd skills. so... laughter. ..so as a member of that cabinet, what weird explanation does the chancellor have as to why, according to the office of national statistics, productivity is falling at its fastest annual pace for five years? mr speaker, we've just had an unprecedented decade of growth. it's the first decade of uninterrupted growth —

only the third time since 1700 that we've had an uninterrupted decade of growth, thanks to the work of this government! and when it comes to weirdos and misfits, i know there are many on that side of the house, but they need not apply. and an mp accused a member of the house of lords of abusing security staff at westminster. the snp‘s hannah bardell raised the alleged behaviour of lord maginnis — a former ulster unionist mp — with the commons speaker. yesterday on reentering the building for the first time after christmas, i witnessed one of the worst cases of abuse of security staff i have seen in my time here.

one of the members of the other place, who i will name so as to not incriminate anybody else, lord ken maginnis, had forgotten his pass — something we've all been guilty of. however, instead of taking the advice of the security staff who, as we all know, are here for our security and our safety, he proceeded to verbally abuse and shout at both members of staff, calling them crooked, saying, did they not know who he was, he had been here for 46 years — and refusing to take the advice and assistance of both myself, the security staff, and the police that then attended. lord maginnis later told a newspaper the row was "much ado about nothing" and he had nothing to apologise for. hannah ba rdell has reported him to the police. now david cameron used to say that it was a third—term issue — low priority — but could house of lords reform be back on the political agenda? the conservative manifesto promised to set up a constitution, democracy, and rights commission — and the future of the lords may well be part of it.

ministers are said to be looking at plans from a cross—party group that could see the lords either abolished, or become an elected senate of the nations and regions. campaigners say change can‘t come quickly enough, but they‘re not holding their breath. we‘ve heard talk of lords reform in terms of better regional representation being on the desk of people at number ten. but we‘ve been here before, there‘s lots of talk about lords reform — in fact, in the last 20 years, there‘s been nine attempts at lords reform of some sort, if we look at draft bills and committees and white papers, but what we really need to see is some action. this is an issue which has high public support, and we really can‘t go on much longer with an unelected upper chamber. it‘s just simply doesn‘t fit in our modern democracy. the idea of lords reform features in an act of union bill put forward by the constitution reform group. the former labour mp and ex—chair of the vote leave campaign, gisela stuart, sits on the group‘s steering committee.

gisela stuart, what is the problem that your act of union bill is trying to fix? it started about five years ago when i asked the then—prime minister, david cameron — and this was before he called the referendum on our membership of the european union — whether he would meet us, because it was our argument that devolution was in very much unfinished business in the united kingdom. we had devolved power in a very asymmetric way to northern ireland, scotland, wales, and london. we kind of finished and overlooked the rest of england. we started doing coalition years that the function of the house of lords is being a revising chamber when no party had the majority was no longer working very effectively. and i remember literally saying to david cameron, "irrespective of the outcome of the eu referendum,

you are the prime minister of a deeply fractured nation". and that‘s what we are trying to address, a new look of how the four nations work together and hold together. and what is your solution for the house of lords? we offer one option, which goes for — you have complete abolition. and you really look very much like the german second chamber, where you have representatives of the regions who speak collectively. or you have a house of lords which has an element of being elected. we ended up with a figure of 292 to be elected for 15—year terms, and 100 appointed. the one thing we definitely decided was that the house of lords should not be for life. right, right. and haven‘t we been here before? you were an mp back in 2003. you will remember mps spent a whole day discussing voting on seven different options for the future of the house of lords, and they rejected them all. the problem is that people may agree there needs to be change, but they can‘t agree on the type of change that there should be. oh, i remember it well. and there‘s nothing worse

in the house of commons than when mps are not whipped on how to vote, and you have a whole string of votes and... make up their own mind! ..and you go, "what are we voting on? is it 18, is it 100?" but you identified the problem in your question. there were so many options on the table, and i think that unless we start by saying, "what do we think the house of lords is for"? and once we‘ve agreed on that, i think the options on how you compose that body will almost naturally flow from itself. gisela stuart, thank you very much, indeed. pleasure. the newly—strengthened snp force at westminster has wasted little time in making its presence felt. with 48 of the 59 seats in scotland, the snp dominated scottish questions — its mps making the same

demand for scotland to have the power to hold another independence referendum. the party‘s westminster leader drove home the message during prime minister‘s questions. mr speaker, today the scottish parliament will decline legislative consent to the withdrawal vote we are deliberating later today. why is this conservative government dismissing the will of the people of scotland, ignoring their voicing, and disregarding our parliament? mr speaker, i think the real question is, why does the snp keep going on about breaking up the most successful union in history? to distract from their abundant failures in government! cheering. in spite of getting an extra £9 billion a year from the uk exchequer — which of course they would lose if

they were to foolishly break away — they are mismanaging their health care, and you'll see, i'm afraid — it is not the fault of scottish pupils, but you're seeing scottish schools falling behind in the educational sense. concentrate on what you're doing, and stop going on about breaking up the union! now what‘s been happening in the wider world of politics this week? with our countdown, here‘s najiba feroze. at five — pronouncing place names that are not spelled phonetically can be tricky sometimes. here is how the leader of the house of commons, jacob rees—mogg, dealt with it. for starters, it‘s rhondda. not rhon—da, rhon—the. the honourable gentlemen, the memberfor... ..very generously, when i was newly—elected, took me to the smoking room and gave me a couple glasses of scotch from his finest produce to help me learn how to pronounce his constituency. at four — the scottish brexit secretary, michael russell, and conservative msp murdo fraser... you used to be opposed to brexit, so at least i am consistent. well, i am a democrat. we had a referendum, and i believe we should honour

the outcome of the referendum. but let's not get into this, because it's a matter of debate. well, i know it‘s embarrassing for you... oh, i'm not the one embarrassed, cabinet secretary commissioner. at three — oh, what kind of tea should you drink in scotland? have a listen to what lord duncan of springbank says. on a bizarre point, i was criticised over the christmas period for not drinking scottish tea, but yorkshire tea. even on these issues in scotland, grievances can be found. laughter. at two — was this a freudian slip from the treasury minister, rishi sunak? we‘ve committed to finding 20,000 new police officers by the end of 2023 to help keep our seats — streets safe... laughter. and at one — away from the commons, laura smith, a former mp who lost her seat in the general election has been photographed at the localjobcentre. she tweeted her response. najiba feroz reporting. now, the brexit arguments may be on hold in the commons — at least for now —

but there‘s plenty of unfinished business there. mps are still divided over how — if at all — to mark the uk‘s departure from the eu at the end of the month. a party, or a wake? a celebratory drink, or a dram to drown your sorrows? or should a famous bell — currently silent — be centre stage? as we leave at a precise, specified time, those who wish to celebrate will need to look to a clock to mark the moment. laughter. it seems inconceivable to me and many colleagues that that clock should not be the most iconic timepiece in the world — big ben.

will he make representations to the house of commons commission, whose decision this is, that big ben should bong for brexit? can the government confirm whether or not it will request for the chiming of big ben to mark 11pm on 31 january? because this is not going to be a moment of celebration for many people across the uk, but a moment of considerable concern, not least my constituents who are citizens — nationals of the european union. and perhaps they should be asking on that side of the house, if they do want to hear the bells chime, is for whom the bell will toll? ministers are sympathetic to the idea, but it‘ll be up to the commons authorities to decide. that‘s it for the week in parliament. i hope you canjoin mandy baker on bbc parliament at 11pm on monday night for the latest from the commons and the lords. thank you for watching. from me, david cornock, bye for now.

hello. saturday was another mild and a wet and windy day — rather like january has been thus far. and the reason for it — the jet stream has looked like this. and you‘ll notice as i take you through the next few days, it will continue in similar vein — pretty strong, firing in from the west and south—west, and in each kink, we will see a succession of low pressure systems delivering yet more wet and windy and mild weather towards the british isles. and that‘s rather how we start the day across a good part of england and wales, although i suspect that once the cloud and rain has quit the scene, by around about lunchtime on the east coast, it will be a glorious afternoon. plenty of sunshine around. dry for the most part too, save for a peppering of showers across the north and west of scotland, urged along in this neck of the woods by a noticeable south—westerly wind. but nowhere near as windy

for many of us as was the case on saturday, and those temperatures still hanging onto double figures down across the southern half of britain. and then, as the sun sets, the temperatures will tumble away underneath relatively clear skies. yes, one or two showers still coming through on the breeze, but things will cloud up in the west to finish off the night. but further east, it could be a chilly start to monday. a dry one for many of us, too. that, however, will not last very long. notice the number of isobars here, squeezing up all the while as a very vigorous area of low pressure throws this active weather front in towards the western side of the british isles not very far into monday, so don‘t be fooled by the dry start because it will turn increasingly very wet indeed from the west to many parts of northern ireland, certainly scotland, the west of england, then into wales. and the gusts of wind willjust keep on building, such that at some point, we could well see gusts of wind to around 60, 70, if not 80 mph in extremis across the north—west of scotland. not a cold day by any means at all, but one to watch out for, particularly if you‘re on the move. and then as that area of low pressure quits the scene, itjust makes room for another spell

of wet and windy weather to pile in on tuesday from this south—western quarter. so again, many of you start the day dry and chilly and bright. but it doesn‘t stay that way, and as this mild air rushes up towards the scottish borders, there‘ll be a conversion, we suspect, of rain to snow across the southern uplands, then north of the central belt across the higher ground. very mild indeed in the south. so disruptively windy, really quite wet at times in the first half of the week. mild, perhaps a tad drier, later in the week.