tv The Papers BBC News January 17, 2020 11:30pm-12:00am GMT
11:30 pm
hello. this is bbc news. in a moment a its issues. we will have a night—time frost. a cold start to saturday morning with a few icy we are going to be taking a look at patches. it will still be a few tomorrow morning's papers with my hours before those showers finally guests but first, a quick reminder start to fizzle across the north and of the headlines. psychiatrist call west of scotland. they will continue through the night and into saturday for social media companies to hand morning. saturday evening, they will over their data so they can research still be across the northern isles. what the online world is doing to so it is cold here, especially with children's mental health. two of the the brisk wind, but for many, candidates for the labour party despite some cloud in the south and west, sunny, dry, feeling chilly, leadership, rebecca long—bailey and temperature is about average for emily form bree launch their this time of year. they will drop campaigns today. iran supreme leader again very rapidly on saturday night and it will be an even harsher frost. by that i mean temperatures has appealed for unity following will be lower again. out in the anti—government protests last week over the accidental shooting down of countryside, minus four degrees or a passenger plane. glasgow reaffirms minus five celsius. a little bit of ice, possibly a few pockets of fog. localised, but they take time to its pledge to become a carbon clear, of course. a bit more cloud neutral city by 2030 amid fresh because we have a south—westerly warnings over global warming. and in breeze across northern and western parts of scotland on sunday. again, temperature is very much where they should be at this time of year. now, sport, saracens further deduction for breaking salary rules and will sunday night into monday morning doesn't look as cold, purely because now be relegated at the end of the we've got more cloud. frosty on the season now be relegated at the end of the season meaning they will also be
11:31 pm
south and because we have more cloud ineligible to play in next season's champions cup. we are introducing more moisture, the south—westerly, the likelihood is that we could see some hoar frost and more fog for the rush hour on monday morning. again, just a bit more cloud creeps underneath that area of high pressure, perhaps not quite as much sunshine on monday or hello there and welcome to our indeed tuesday, by which stage that lookahead to what the papers will be week when the front has sunk south. bringing us tomorrow. with me i have it might bring bits of drizzly rain across scotland and northern ireland david bond, the brexit editorfor and it certainly introduces again more moisture at lower levels, so the financial times and nicola the potential for some fog. more moisture at lower levels, so the potentialfor some fog. it brightens up towards the north bartlett the political correspondent again, and as it produces more cloud for the daily mirror. at first, means it will not be quite as cold let's have a look at the front pages. we will start of with the at night. therefore not quite as chilly by day. by and large, until we get towards next weekend, barely telegraph. their leaders a scheme a raindrop on the chart for the that offers criminals rehabilitation rather jail time, that offers criminals rehabilitation ratherjailtime, reporting forecast from tuesday to saturday, that offers criminals rehabilitation ratherjail time, reporting that almost one order of police forces and that is because, as i say, that use it and that it could go high pressure is intense. it is ruling the roost and keeping those nationwide. the independent leads weather fronts at bay. even when they creep in, monday— tuesday, they are very weak affairs. still holds with the government considering scrapping part of the h is to on, but gradually with time it
11:32 pm
sta rts project. the times reports that a on, but gradually with time it starts to sink further south, because the jet stream, the intense senior police officer ignored jet stream that has been maintaining pakistani grooming gangs for 30 the low pressure further north, yea rs pakistani grooming gangs for 30 sta rts the low pressure further north, starts to sink further south, so years because they did not want to increase racial tension. and onto that high pressure starts to decline harry and meghan. the sun splashes and that means it relinquishes its influence across the uk, and we on the story that sussex merchandise start to see low pressure arriving. is being put on sale in shops after soa start to see low pressure arriving. so a change, we think towards the end of next week and into next the couple's shock announcement that they would no longer be senior weekend, we will see the return of royals stop and the royal's decision more wind and rain. uncertainties over timings and exact locations of to step down also caused a row in yesterday's question time with the those pressures, so for most of us, 00:02:30,407 --> 4294966103:13:29,430 a prolonged dry spell awaits. daily mail leading on their front page with that particular story. the guardian splashes on news that increasing numbers of schools that make schools are using isolation booths to punish disruptive pupils. they warn that it could be damaging for children's mental health. the daily mirror ‘s front pages an exclusive interview with the footballing hero who says that he has turned his life around thanks to anti— booze pellets. and will dig
11:33 pm
(gunshot) on brexit day? the daily express reports that tory mps are demanding a commons vote to decide whether it chimes onjanuary 30 one. —— january whether it chimes onjanuary 30 one. ——january 31. whether it chimes onjanuary 30 one. —— january 31. let's start with a message from the chancellor. my own paper tomorrow he has done a strongly worded and frank interview with us on what business should expect from the upcoming trade negotiations after brexit. that is afterjanuary 3i negotiations after brexit. that is afterjanuary 31 when we get into the difficult conversation that we need to have with brussels over what our relationship and trading partnership will be. he has been clear and he said there will not be alignment and we will not take rules from brussels, we will not be in the single market and we will not be in the customs union and we will do this by the end of the year.
11:34 pm
crucially he is urging businesses, telling business that they will have to adjust and this will be very difficult for business to take. i was with someone from a big script today who are saying that they are watching and waiting for signals from the government. they don't quite know yet because he has a big majority and they know they are happy verity corbyn is not prime minister but they do not quite know yet what a future trade deal will look like. but certainly when they read the paper tomorrow they will know exactly what sajid javid says. he is clear that when he says that some businesses will struggle, that is the price they will have to pay. but this uncertainty was the problem before. doesn't that raise the flag ain? before. doesn't that raise the flag again? it is interesting in the way that make but says the company needs to adjust. they still don't know what they are meant to adjust for. he says we have known since 2016 the
11:35 pm
we will leave the eu but there has been no clear outline and you can totally understand their frustration. it is interesting that he chose to come out with this tone in the financial times, the business paper. and his kind of taking a much. there has been uncertainty about what kind of prime minister borisjohnson will be, about what kind of prime minister boris johnson will be, especially with the huge majority. he can afford to be more of a one nation tory, and some mps who reluctantly supported him suggests he might be. if this suggests that they are going to go into these negotiations with this strong approach i don't think we will see much of that and i don't really think the eu will respond that well to it. the point is the business do not have to stay in the uk. you might tell them that this is how it is but they may up and go.
11:36 pm
any details as to how the uk will support business to get them through this? one of the great ironies of this? one of the great ironies of this is that borisjohnson has been talking about wanting to relax some of the rules around state a free sample. so things like what had with flybe this week. so struggling communities, they will be prepared to put more investment. sajid javid said he wants to increase investment. he now has more freedom to increase capital investment. he has changed for school rules so he can do that. but it seems slightly illogical that you then go for an away goal, particularly in the north—east when you think about the car industry there. manufacturing is going to be hit hard by the idea of friction at the borders after we get
11:37 pm
to the end of the year if we do not have a proper trade deal with the eu. turning now to the daily telegraph. were not waiting on a royal baby this time, we are waiting ona royal baby this time, we are waiting on a royal deal. a very uncomfortable position for the royal family. they are not used to being on the back foot in this way, especially the queen. she is having to deal with the situation that harry and meghan have put her in, which is sort of seems it was not quite told to her in advance. a lead oi'i quite told to her in advance. a lead on this. they had been planning it for quite some time but the palace did not seem to be prepared. meghan has already gone to canada to begin the process and there are so many questions about the status, about the security and the cost is a real concern for the public. and none of
11:38 pm
that seems to have been sorted out in the timeframe that the queen would have hoped for. a bit of wishful thinking there, five days. it is only five days and so much has happened in this story in such as short space of time. it has only been five days that personal statement from the queen since that statement. there is a lot to sort out and people say you need to think about security and who pays for that, thinking about their titles and what happens around the future role that they may continue to play evenif role that they may continue to play even if they do go and live in canada. there is much to be resolved and don't forget that actually harry and don't forget that actually harry and meghan seem to have been planning this for a long time. they probably know where they would like to get to it is just whether the rest of the royal family can get there quick enough. and minor future roles, sorry the future roles of minor royals, rather. and there has
11:39 pm
been a healthy discussion for the country to be having because it can bea country to be having because it can be a polarising thing between we wa nt to be a polarising thing between we want to abolish the monarchy and those were strongly royalist. most people are probably somewhere in the middle. this throws up questions about that full if you look at some of the european countries that still have monarchies, unless you are the actual queen or king in the direct airyou actual queen or king in the direct air you lead actual queen or king in the direct airyou lead a actual queen or king in the direct air you lead a fairly normal life. and i think if the royal family wants to protect itself and future proof itself as it were, the queen may be mindful of that element. that may be mindful of that element. that may secure it, rather than doubling down and facing more public clash. turning now to the daily mail. still about the sussex is a race row that is centred on question time last night did it you watch the programme, you caught up? yes. i used the iplayer catch up. very
11:40 pm
useful. it was an extraordinary... basically a conversation between lawrence fox, who i only knew was an actor, i did not know where he stood oi'i actor, i did not know where he stood on these issues before. and someone i believe is an academic, electra, rachel boyle who was in the audience and she ended it referring to him as and she ended it referring to him as a white privileged mail and he called her racist for saying that because she was pointing out what i would say isjust because she was pointing out what i would say is just stating what is true. i think this whole debate has been interesting over the treatment of meghan. to my mind there has been a lot of language, especially in the media, which borders on euphemistically racist, if that makes sense. referring to her vibrance, life and all these words that i think are pointing to her race, essentially. and actually he
11:41 pm
got quite defensive about this but i think we do have to have these discussions about how we have referred to her and why it has been a difficult relationship. in this discussion goes beyond meghan and the royals because how this has developed now is the inability of some people to accept what racism is or how it has affected the person on the other end. this is what this discussion has now developed into. and if there is one good thing that comes out of this i think it will be a greater awareness of how people should treat each other and particularly there has been a lot of focus on the way that the press have treated meghan and harry and that certainly has been part of the mix in their decision, i am sure. if you look at how they have tried to take back control of their own media channels, if you think about the way
11:42 pm
they use social media and try to push the tabloids away, of course you need to think about the history of the family and princess diana and you just realise how much does go to the way that the press feel depressed betrays you. the final front the finalfront page the final front page on the subject of the duke and duchess of sussex. let's turn back quickly to the front page of the telegraph. we are going to talk about a violent offenders, avoiding prosecution. does that mean an admission of guilt has been left out of this? that is what is not quite clear from this piece. out of this? that is what is not quite clearfrom this piece. it transpires this has been used by quite a number of forces. it talks about almost a quarter of the total in england and wales. they are deferring prosecution, allowing for
11:43 pm
rehabilitation in four months, and if the person who has been charged, or is about to be charged, if they com plete or is about to be charged, if they complete that successfully, those charges can be dropped. the difficulty is where it leaves the victim, it seems to be. clearly the telegraph do not like this. one of the interesting questions for me as if you think again about boris johnson's election agenda, it was all about being tough on crime, more police officers and so on, just quite how this fits into that, how it will play out with the public and the idea somebody commits an offence and is then able to sort of negotiate a way of getting out of it, it could play badly with some conservative supporters who would not expect that of a conservative government. 0n the other hand, here isa government. 0n the other hand, here is a way of reducing costs, reducing prosecutions and of course reducing the numbers in our overcrowded prisons. there will be a lot of people, probably if they are charged for the first time, he would get suspended sentences for some of
11:44 pm
these offences. and actually, if you are having a deferred prosecution which involves some kind of rehabilitation, to my mind that seems more logical, but you are actually doing something to prevent them reoffending, and of course reoffending is the big issue. many of the people who end up in prison have committed multiple offences. the idea is that it could be rolled out to other police forces, it is already being used in the west midlands and durham. let's turn to the guardian. an education story. concern over isolation boots. this isa concern over isolation boots. this is a really, really shocking story which the guardian is reporting, but schools are converting toilet blocks and classrooms to build isolation booths to accommodate disruptive pupils. 0ne booths to accommodate disruptive pupils. one of the schools, it is reported that a sort of mobile or portable birth made out of cardboard was used to place over a child in the classroom. —— booth. pupils told
11:45 pm
of being put in isolation over minor uniform breaches or the wrong hairstyle. we have seen some similar reports of this over the past few months, i think. reports of this over the past few months, ithink. the bbc has reports of this over the past few months, i think. the bbc has done its own investigative work on this. and as a parent, this is really, really shocking stuff. and as a parent, this is really, really shocking stufflj and as a parent, this is really, really shocking stuff. i was going to say, the other side of this is that you start to question what is happening within classrooms, under that disruptive behaviour. —— under that disruptive behaviour. —— under that term, disruptive behaviour. that is the real difficulty. there will always be pupils that are disruptive for whatever reason. sometimes that is because of obligations at home, difficulties they are going through, they might be struggling with their mental health. the whole number of reasons. quite a stark way of dealing with it. teachers are under pressure. and to have the training, and how to deal with this? sometimes when these processes start being used they become the norm within a school or
11:46 pm
32 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
BBC NewsUploaded by TV Archive on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ec37/4ec3793397114230fd6d430d38d5901e3dd060e8" alt=""